survival after single versus bilateral lung transplantation for copd and pulmonary fibrosis
DESCRIPTION
Survival after single versus bilateral lung transplantation for COPD and pulmonary fibrosis. A. Demir, D. Van Raemdonck, G. Verleden, L. Dupont, W. Coosemans, H. Decaluwé, P. De Leyn, P. Nafteux, T. Lerut. University Hospital Gasthuisberg Leuven Belgium. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Survival after single versus bilateral lung Survival after single versus bilateral lung transplantation for COPD and pulmonary transplantation for COPD and pulmonary
fibrosisfibrosis
University Hospital GasthuisbergLeuvenBelgium
A. Demir, D. Van Raemdonck, G. Verleden, L. A. Demir, D. Van Raemdonck, G. Verleden, L. Dupont, W. Coosemans, H. Decaluwé, P. De Leyn, Dupont, W. Coosemans, H. Decaluwé, P. De Leyn,
P. Nafteux, T. LerutP. Nafteux, T. Lerut
NUMBER OF LUNG TRANSPLANTS REPORTED NUMBER OF LUNG TRANSPLANTS REPORTED BY YEAR AND PROCEDURE TYPEBY YEAR AND PROCEDURE TYPE
5 7 36 78190
419
704
922
10871223
13581338145014601491
16281690
187919302071
23862448
2708
0
250
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2000
2250
2500
2750
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Nu
mb
er
of
Tra
ns
pla
nts
Bilateral/Double LungSingle Lung
ISHLTNOTE: This figure includes only the lung transplants that are reported to the ISHLT Transplant Registry. As such, this should not be construed as representing changes in the number of lung transplants performed worldwide.
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: IndicationsADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Indications (1/1995-6/2008)(1/1995-6/2008)
DIAGNOSISDIAGNOSIS SLT (N = SLT (N = 10,19010,190)) BLT (N = BLT (N = 13,33813,338)) TOTAL (N = TOTAL (N = 23,52823,528))
COPD/EmphysemaCOPD/Emphysema 4,994 ( 49.0% )4,994 ( 49.0% ) 3,423 ( 25.7% )3,423 ( 25.7% ) 8,417 ( 35.8% )8,417 ( 35.8% )
Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisIdiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis 2,967 ( 29.1% )2,967 ( 29.1% ) 1,930 ( 14.5% )1,930 ( 14.5% ) 4,897 ( 20.8% )4,897 ( 20.8% )
Cystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis 191 ( 1.9% )191 ( 1.9% ) 3,552 ( 26.6% )3,552 ( 26.6% ) 3,743 ( 15.9% )3,743 ( 15.9% )
Alpha-1Alpha-1 662 ( 6.5% )662 ( 6.5% ) 1,017 ( 7.6% )1,017 ( 7.6% ) 1,679 ( 7.1% )1,679 ( 7.1% )
Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial HypertensionIdiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension 74 ( 0.7% )74 ( 0.7% ) 714 ( 5.4% )714 ( 5.4% ) 788 ( 3.3% )788 ( 3.3% )
SarcoidosisSarcoidosis 212 ( 2.1% )212 ( 2.1% ) 391 ( 2.9% )391 ( 2.9% ) 603 ( 2.6% )603 ( 2.6% )
BronchiectasisBronchiectasis 40 ( 0.4% )40 ( 0.4% ) 596 ( 4.5% )596 ( 4.5% ) 636 ( 2.7% )636 ( 2.7% )
LAMLAM 80 ( 0.8% )80 ( 0.8% ) 157 ( 1.2% )157 ( 1.2% ) 237 ( 1.0% )237 ( 1.0% )
Congenital Heart DiseaseCongenital Heart Disease 19 ( 0.2% )19 ( 0.2% ) 144 ( 1.1% )144 ( 1.1% ) 163 ( 0.7% )163 ( 0.7% )
Re-Transplant: Obliterative BronchiolitisRe-Transplant: Obliterative Bronchiolitis 160 ( 1.6% )160 ( 1.6% ) 134 ( 1.0% )134 ( 1.0% ) 294 ( 1.2% )294 ( 1.2% )
Obliterative Bronchiolitis Obliterative Bronchiolitis
(Not Re-Transplant)(Not Re-Transplant)
53 ( 0.5% )53 ( 0.5% ) 150 ( 1.1% )150 ( 1.1% ) 203 ( 0.9% )203 ( 0.9% )
Re-Transplant: Not Obliterative BronchiolitisRe-Transplant: Not Obliterative Bronchiolitis 105 ( 1.0% )105 ( 1.0% ) 97 ( 0.7% )97 ( 0.7% ) 202 ( 0.9% )202 ( 0.9% )
Connective Tissue DiseaseConnective Tissue Disease 68 ( 0.7% )68 ( 0.7% ) 113 ( 0.8% )113 ( 0.8% ) 181 ( 0.8% )181 ( 0.8% )
Interstitial PneumonitisInterstitial Pneumonitis 32 ( 0.3% )32 ( 0.3% ) 29 ( 0.2% )29 ( 0.2% ) 61 ( 0.3% )61 ( 0.3% )
CancerCancer 6 ( 0.1% )6 ( 0.1% ) 17 ( 0.1% )17 ( 0.1% ) 23 ( 0.1% )23 ( 0.1% )
OtherOther 527 ( 5.2% )527 ( 5.2% ) 874 ( 6.6% )874 ( 6.6% ) 1,401 ( 6.0% )1,401 ( 6.0% )
ISHLT
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Distribution of Procedure Type for Major IndicationsDistribution of Procedure Type for Major Indications (1992-2007)(1992-2007)
ISHLT
Year of Year of TXTX
Alpha-1Alpha-1 COPDCOPD Cystic FibrosisCystic Fibrosis IPFIPF IPAHIPAH
DoubleDouble SingleSingle DoubleDouble SingleSingle DoubleDouble SingleSingle DoubleDouble SingleSingle DoubleDouble SingleSingle
19921992 28.128.1 71.971.9 16.416.4 83.683.6 97.097.0 3.03.0 10.210.2 89.889.8 26.626.6 73.473.4
19931993 38.738.7 61.361.3 16.016.0 84.084.0 94.994.9 5.15.1 16.516.5 83.583.5 53.853.8 46.246.2
19941994 43.043.0 57.057.0 18.918.9 81.181.1 86.186.1 13.913.9 13.913.9 86.186.1 64.364.3 35.735.7
19951995 46.246.2 53.853.8 21.421.4 78.678.6 89.789.7 10.310.3 27.927.9 72.172.1 89.389.3 10.710.7
19961996 47.347.3 52.752.7 26.826.8 73.273.2 87.087.0 13.013.0 27.327.3 72.772.7 82.082.0 18.018.0
19971997 46.446.4 53.653.6 26.326.3 73.773.7 92.992.9 7.17.1 22.222.2 77.877.8 90.090.0 10.010.0
19981998 48.548.5 51.551.5 28.828.8 71.271.2 92.692.6 7.47.4 20.120.1 79.979.9 86.886.8 13.213.2
19991999 47.047.0 53.053.0 28.128.1 71.971.9 90.890.8 9.29.2 23.023.0 77.077.0 86.086.0 14.014.0
20002000 58.158.1 41.941.9 29.029.0 71.071.0 94.794.7 5.35.3 31.831.8 68.268.2 92.692.6 7.47.4
20012001 59.959.9 40.140.1 28.628.6 71.471.4 94.094.0 6.06.0 30.030.0 69.769.7 89.889.8 10.210.2
20022002 56.656.6 43.443.4 38.538.5 61.561.5 96.296.2 3.83.8 35.135.1 64.964.9 89.989.9 10.110.1
20032003 65.465.4 34.634.6 42.242.2 57.857.8 95.195.1 4.94.9 41.841.8 58.258.2 95.495.4 4.64.6
20042004 73.973.9 26.126.1 45.345.3 54.754.7 96.296.2 3.83.8 44.044.0 56.056.0 94.494.4 5.65.6
20052005 77.877.8 22.222.2 49.749.7 50.350.3 97.797.7 2.32.3 46.246.2 53.853.8 90.590.5 9.59.5
20062006 76.376.3 23.723.7 58.558.5 41.541.5 99.299.2 0.80.8 49.349.3 50.750.7 100.0100.0 0.00.0
20072007 86.986.9 13.113.1 64.564.5 35.535.5 97.197.1 2.92.9 48.848.8 51.251.2 94.194.1 5.95.9
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONProcedure Type within Indication, by YearProcedure Type within Indication, by Year
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
% o
f tr
ansp
lan
ts
Bilateral/Double Lung Transplant Single Lung Transplant
AT Def COPD IPF IPAH
ISHLT 2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Indications for Single Lung Transplants ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Indications for Single Lung Transplants (Transplants: (Transplants: January 1995 - June 2008)January 1995 - June 2008)
ISHLT
*Other includes:
Sarcoidosis: 2.1%
Bronchiectasis: 0.4%
Congenital Heart Disease: 0.2%
LAM: 0.8%
OB (non-ReTx): 0.5%
Miscellaneous: 6.3%
49%
29%
3%1%
2%
6%
10%
Alpha-1 COPD CF IPF IPAH Re-Tx Other*
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Indications for Bilateral/Double Lung Transplants ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATION: Indications for Bilateral/Double Lung Transplants (Transplants: January 1995 - June 2008)(Transplants: January 1995 - June 2008)
26%
14%2%5%
26%
8%
19%
Alpha-1 COPD CF IPF IPAH Re-Tx Other*
ISHLT
*Other includes:
Sarcoidosis: 2.9%
Bronchiectasis: 4.5%
Congenital Heart Disease: 1.1%
LAM: 1.2%
OB (non-ReTx): 1.1%
Miscellaneous: 7.7%
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONKaplan-Meier Survival Kaplan-Meier Survival (Transplants: January 1994 - June 2007)(Transplants: January 1994 - June 2007)
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years
Su
rviv
al (
%)
.
Bilateral/Double Lung (N=12,246)
Single Lung (N=10,081)
All Lungs (N=22,328)
Double lung: 1/2-life = 6.6 Years; Conditional 1/2-life = 9.0 YearsSingle lung: 1/2-life = 4.6 Years; Conditional 1/2-life = 6.4 YearsAll lungs: 1/2-life = 5.4 Years; Conditional 1/2-life = 7.4 Years
P < 0.0001
ISHLT
2009
AimAim
Whether single lung transplantation (SLTx) or Whether single lung transplantation (SLTx) or bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) should be bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) should be preferred for patients with end-stage pulmonary preferred for patients with end-stage pulmonary fibrosis and COPD remains unknown. fibrosis and COPD remains unknown.
The objective of this retrospective study was to The objective of this retrospective study was to analyze factors recorded in a prospective analyze factors recorded in a prospective database that are predictive fordatabase that are predictive for long-term long-term survival in our lung transplant cohorsurvival in our lung transplant cohort t
Patients and MethodsPatients and Methods
Between July 1991 and December 2009Between July 1991 and December 2009
329 LTx with COPD and Fibrotic patients, 329 LTx with COPD and Fibrotic patients,
193 M and 136 F, Mean age:54.5 years [23-69] 193 M and 136 F, Mean age:54.5 years [23-69]
COPD patients (n=226)COPD patients (n=226)– BLTx (65%)BLTx (65%)– SLTx (35%) SLTx (35%)
FFibrotic patients (n=103)ibrotic patients (n=103)– SLTx (56%) SLTx (56%) – BLTx (44%) BLTx (44%)
The overall 5 and 10-year survival rate was 65% and 51% for The overall 5 and 10-year survival rate was 65% and 51% for recipients with COPD and 57% and 41% recipients with recipients with COPD and 57% and 41% recipients with pulmonary fibrosis (p=0.09)pulmonary fibrosis (p=0.09)..
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONKaplan-Meier Survival By DiagnosisKaplan-Meier Survival By Diagnosis (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)(Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)
YearYear ALPHA-1 ALPHA-1 (N=2,085)(N=2,085)
CF CF (N=3,746)(N=3,746)
COPD COPD (N=8,812)(N=8,812)
IPF IPF (N=4,695)(N=4,695)
IPAH IPAH (N=1,065)(N=1,065)
SARCOIDOSIS SARCOIDOSIS (N=597)(N=597)
11 78.778.7 82.682.6 82.482.4 74.174.1 71.171.1 72.272.2
33 64.864.8 67.567.5 65.365.3 58.558.5 60.360.3 57.857.8
55 55.755.7 57.457.4 50.850.8 45.945.9 51.751.7 51.951.9
77 45.945.9 5050 38.538.5 35.435.4 44.544.5 43.543.5
1010 32.632.6 39.639.6 22.922.9 22.322.3 32.432.4 31.931.9
Survival comparisonsAlpha-1 vs. CF: p < 0.0001 Alpha-1 vs. COPD: p < 0.0001 Alpha-1 vs. IPF: p < 0.0001 Alpha-1 vs. Sarcoidosis: p = 0.0380CF vs. COPD: p < 0.0001 CF vs. IPF: p < 0.0001CF vs. IPAH: p < 0.0001 CF vs. Sarcoidosis: p < 0.0001IPAH vs. IPF: p = 0.0046 COPD vs. IPF: p < 0.0001
Note: Other comparisons are not statistically different.
ISHLT
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONKaplan-Meier Survival By DiagnosisKaplan-Meier Survival By Diagnosis (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)(Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)
0
25
50
75
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Years
Su
rviv
al (
%)
Alpha-1 (N=2,085) CF (N=3,746) COPD (N=8,812)
IPF (N=4,695) IPAH (N=1,065) Sarcoidosis (N=597)
HALF-LIFE Alpha-1: 6.1 Years; CF: 7.0 Years; COPD: 5.1 Years; IPF: 4.3 Years; IPAH: 5.6 Years; Sarcoidosis: 5.3 Years
ISHLT
Survival comparisonsAlpha-1 vs. CF: p < 0.0001Alpha-1 vs. COPD: p < 0.0001 Alpha-1 vs. IPF: p < 0.0001Alpha-1 vs. Sarcoidosis: p = 0.0380CF vs. COPD: p < 0.0001CF vs. IPF: p < 0.0001CF vs. IPAH: p < 0.0001CF vs. Sarcoidosis: p < 0.0001IPAH vs. IPF: p = 0.0046COPD vs. IPF: p < 0.0001
2009
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type Kaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007) (Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)
Diagnosis: Emphysema/COPDDiagnosis: Emphysema/COPD
0
25
50
75
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Years
Su
rviv
al (
%)
COPD/Single lung (N=5,683)
COPD/Double lung (N=3,129) N=138
N=60
P < 0.0001
N at risk at 5 years = 744
N at risk at 5 years = 1,786
ISHLT
2009
Overall 5-year survival rate was higher after BLTX compared to Overall 5-year survival rate was higher after BLTX compared to SLTx in recipients with COPD (77% vs. 49%;SLTx in recipients with COPD (77% vs. 49%; p p < 0.001) < 0.001)
ADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONADULT LUNG TRANSPLANTATIONKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure TypeKaplan-Meier Survival by Procedure Type
(Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)(Transplants: January 1990 – June 2007)
Diagnosis: Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisDiagnosis: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
0
25
50
75
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Years
Su
rviv
al (
%)
IPF/Single lung (N=3,054)
IPF/Double lung (N=1,640) N=66
N=27
p = 0.0004
N at risk at 5 years = 241
N at risk at 5 years = 659
ISHLT
2009
Overall 5-year survival rate wasOverall 5-year survival rate wasn’t n’t after BLTX compared to after BLTX compared to SLTxSLTx in recipients with in recipients with fibrosis (55% versus 56%; p=0.35) fibrosis (55% versus 56%; p=0.35)
Bilateral versus single lung transplantation Bilateral versus single lung transplantation was not a predictor of early (30 day) and was not a predictor of early (30 day) and late (60 day) mortality after LTx in late (60 day) mortality after LTx in recipients with COPD and pulmonary recipients with COPD and pulmonary fibrosis (fibrosis (pp>0.05). >0.05).
The length of the ICU stay in the bilateral The length of the ICU stay in the bilateral group was significantly longer after LTx in group was significantly longer after LTx in recipients with COPD (recipients with COPD (pp=0.03). =0.03).
ConclusionConclusion
Mortality, morbidity and long-term sMortality, morbidity and long-term survival urvival did not differ between BLTx vs SLTx in did not differ between BLTx vs SLTx in patients with pulmonary fibrosis.. patients with pulmonary fibrosis.. However, BLTx leads to better long-term However, BLTx leads to better long-term survival in recipients with COPD. SLTx survival in recipients with COPD. SLTx may result in fatal complications in the may result in fatal complications in the remaining native emphysematous lungremaining native emphysematous lung. .
Potential advantages for SSLTxPotential advantages for SSLTx
No more native lung presentNo more native lung present– Specific native lung problems may be avoidedSpecific native lung problems may be avoided
Acute Acute hhyperinflationyperinflation Chronic hyperinflation Chronic hyperinflation Infectıon Infectıon Effect of Effect of aaspergillus pneumonia native lung spergillus pneumonia native lung TTumour of the natıve lungumour of the natıve lung
Survival benefit (?)Survival benefit (?)– Early postoperativeEarly postoperative– Late: BOS developmentLate: BOS development– Better QOL and performance? Better QOL and performance?
Potential disadvantages Potential disadvantages
Increasing waiting listsIncreasing waiting lists– Why using two lungs if one may be sufficient?Why using two lungs if one may be sufficient?– Increasing waiting list mortalityIncreasing waiting list mortality