survey results - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · survey results. the survey had a...

15
PRESIDENTIAL SEARCH Special Committee on the Nomination of a President May 19, 2017 SURVEY RESULTS

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

PRESIDENTIAL SEARCH

Special Committee on the Nomination of a PresidentMay 19, 2017

SURVEY RESULTS

Page 2: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents

2

242

246

378

521

544

665

1988

GRADUATE STUDENT

FACULTY

STAFF

ALL OTHERS

PARENT

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT

ALUMNUS/A

AFFILIATION

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017

Page 3: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

“Academic Excellence” and “Tradition and History” rise to the top

in expressing the University’s identity

3

3%

4%

5%

15%

16%

18%

19%

21%

28%

30%

55%

75%

OTHER

R ELAT ION SH IP T O C OMMON WEALT H

H EALT H SY ST EM

ST UDEN T SELF - G OV ER N AN CE

R ESEAR C H AN D DISC OV ER Y

ALUMN I PR IDE/LOY ALT Y

PR OFESSION AL/G R ADUATE SC H OOLS

UN DER G R ADUATE L IB ER AL AR T S EDUC AT ION

UV A C OMMUN IT Y

H ON OR SY ST EM

T R ADIT ION AN D H IST OR Y

AC ADEMIC EX C ELLEN C E

WHEN YOU THINK OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, WHICH THEMES MOST POWERFULLY EXPRESS OUR IDENTITY? (SELECT UP TO THREE)

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 4: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Most powerful themes by respondent affiliation category:

“Academic Excellence” number one across all groups

4

FACULTY STAFF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTGRADUATE STUDENT

PARENT ALUMNUS/A FULL SETALL OTHERS

1) Academic excellence: 72%2) Commitment to

undergraduate education in the liberal arts: 46%

3) Research and discovery of new ideas: 33%

1) Academic excellence: 63%2) Tradition and history: 51%3) UVA Community: 35%

1) Academic excellence: 62%2) Tradition and history: 49%3) Strong professional and

graduate schools: 39%

1) Academic excellence: 73%2) Tradition and history: 52%3) UVA Community: 40%

1) Academic excellence: 83%2) Tradition and history: 61%3) The Honor System: 37%

1) Academic excellence: 79%2) Tradition and history: 59%3) The Honor System: 35%

1) Academic excellence: 75%2) Tradition and history: 55%3) The Honor System: 30%

1) Academic excellence: 64%2) Tradition and history: 47%3) UVA Community: 27%

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 5: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

5

Most powerful themes by affiliation category

6%

3%

6%

7%

33%

9%

31%

46%

33%

10%

30%

72%

O THERR ELA TI O NSHIP TO C O MMO N WEALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F ESS ION AL/ GR AD UATE S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

FACULTY

5%

4%

17%

15%

29%

12%

13%

19%

35%

21%

51%

63%

O THERR E LA T I O NSHIP T O C O MMO N WEALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F ESS ION AL/ GR AD UATE S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

STAFF

3%

4%

3%

9%

10%

19%

19%

19%

23%

37%

61%

83%

O THERR ELA T I O NSHIP T O C O MMO N WE ALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F E SS ION AL/ GR AD UAT E S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

PARENT

3%

5%

5%

11%

24%

14%

39%

17%

26%

27%

49%

62%

O THERR ELA TI O NSHIP TO C O MMO N WEALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F ESS ION AL/ GR AD UATE S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

GRADUATE STUDENT

3%

5%

5%

28%

18%

14%

10%

17%

40%

25%

52%

73%

O THERR ELA T I O NSHIP T O C O MMO N WE ALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F E SS ION AL/ GR AD UAT E S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT

3%

3%

2%

14%

11%

22%

18%

21%

23%

35%

59%

79%

O THERR ELA TI O NSHIP TO C O MMO N WEALTH

HEA LTH S YS TEMS TUD EN T S ELF - GO VER NANC E

R ES EA R CH A N D D I S C OVERYA LUMN I P R I D E/LOYALTY

P R O F ESS ION AL/ GR AD UATE S C HO OLSUN D ER GR A DUATE L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

UV A C O MMUN I TYHO N O R S YS TEM

TR A D I T IO N A N D HI S TO RYA C A D EMIC EX C ELLENC E

ALUMNUS/A

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 6: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

“Remaining a Leader in National Higher Education” and

“Recruiting/Retaining High-Quality Faculty” identified as top priorities

5%

6%

9%

11%

11%

11%

12%

12%

12%

13%

20%

21%

27%

29%

30%

33%

36%

45%

54%

59%

N E W F A C I L I T I E S

O T H E R

L O C A L C O M M U N I T Y R E L A T I O N S H I P S

E N V I R O N M E N T A L S U S T A I N A B I L I T Y

U V A H E A L T H S Y S T E M

N E W A P P R O A C H E S F O R T E A C H I N G / L E A R N I N G

A T H L E T I C E X C E L L E N C E

U N D E R G R A D U A T E R E S I D E N T I A L E X P E R I E N C E

G L O B A L P R E S E N C E

G R A D U A T E A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L S T U D E N T S

S C I E N C E S A N D T E C H N O L O G Y

A D V I S I N G

P R E S E R V I N G H I S T O R I C B U I L D I N G S / G R O U N D S

B R O A D - B A S E D L I B E R A L A R T S E D U C A T I O N

S E C U R I N G R E S O U R C E S / F U N D R A I S I N G

D I V E R S I T Y , I N C L U S I O N , A N D E Q U I T Y

R E S E A R C H A N D S C H O L A R S H I P

A C C E S S A N D A F F O R D A B I L I T Y

R E C R U I T I N G / R E T A I N I N G H I G H - Q U A L I T Y F A C U L T Y

R E M A I N I N G A L E A D E R I N N A T I O N A L H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N

WHICH OF THESE ISSUES SHOULD BECOME THE MOST IMPORTANT PRIORITIES FOR A NEW PRESIDENT AT UVA? (SELECT UP TO FIVE)

6 Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 7: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

7

1) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 61%

2) Improving depth, breadth of research, scholarship: 52%

3) Commitment to a broad-based liberal arts education: 49%

1) Access and affordability: 52%

2) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 49%

3) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 46%

FACULTY STAFF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTGRADUATE STUDENT

PARENT ALUMNUS/A FULL SETALL OTHERS

1) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 55%

2) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 46%

3) Access and affordability: 43%

1) Access and affordability: 55%

2) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 51%

3) Enhancing diversity, inclusion, and equity: 50%

1) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 50%

2) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 41%

3) Access and affordability: 41%

1) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 65%

2) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 62%

3) Securing resources to sustain excellence, including fundraising: 40%

1) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 66%

2) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 57%

3) Access and affordability: 45%

1) Remaining a leader in national higher education: 59%

2) Recruiting and retaining high-quality faculty: 54%

3) Access and affordability: 45%

Top priorities by respondent affiliation category

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 8: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

8

Top priorities by affiliation category

7%

5%

10%

14%

8%

8%

3%

16%

12%

28%

20%

6%

11%

49%

30%

42%

52%

38%

61%

43%

N E W F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA LTH S YS TEM

EN V I R ONMENTAL S US TAINAB IL ITY

N EW A P P R O ACHES F O R TEA C HING/LEAR NING

A THLETI C EX C ELLENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GLO B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R ES ER VING HI S TO RI C B UI LD INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASED L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

S EC UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V ER S ITY, I N CLUSI ON, A N D EQ UI TY

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

FACULTY

10%

7%

17%

25%

17%

12%

5%

11%

11%

10%

20%

16%

23%

25%

27%

44%

34%

52%

46%

49%

N EW F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA LTH S YS TEM

EN V I R ONMENTAL S US TAINAB IL ITY

N EW A P P R O ACHES F O R TEA C HING/LEAR NING

A T HL ET I C EX C ELL ENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GL O B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R ES ER VING HI S TO RI C B UI LD INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASED L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

S E C UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V ER S ITY, I N CLUSI ON, A N D EQ UI TY

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

STAFF

3%

8%

2%

10%

4%

11%

14%

20%

10%

8%

23%

28%

34%

35%

40%

15%

36%

34%

62%

65%

N EW F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA LTH S YS TEM

EN V I R ONMENTAL S US TAINAB IL ITY

N EW A P P R O ACHES F O R TEA C HING/LEAR NING

A T HL ET I C EX C ELL ENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GL O B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R ES ER VING HI S TO RI C B UI LD INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASED L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

S EC UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V ER S ITY, I N CLUSI ON, A N D EQ UI TY

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

PARENT

5%

6%

11%

11%

13%

13%

6%

7%

15%

42%

17%

19%

21%

23%

20%

42%

36%

43%

46%

55%

N EW F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA LTH S YS TEM

EN V I R ONMENTAL S US TAINAB IL ITY

N EW A P P R O ACHE S F O R T E A C HING/L EAR NING

A THLET I C EX C ELLENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GLO B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R ES ER VING HI S TO RI C B UI LD INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASED L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

S EC UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V E R S IT Y, I N CL USI ON, A N D EQ UI T Y

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

GRADUATE STUDENT

9%

5%

18%

8%

25%

12%

12%

8%

15%

4%

22%

32%

18%

16%

18%

50%

31%

55%

49%

51%

N EW F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA L T H S Y S T EM

EN V I R ONMENTAL S US TAINAB IL ITY

N EW A P P R O ACHES F O R TEA C HING/LEAR NING

A THLET I C EX C ELLENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GLO B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R ES ER VING HI S TO RI C B UI LD INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASED L I B ER AL A R TS ED UC A TION

S EC UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V ER S ITY, I N CLUSI ON, A N D EQ UI TY

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT

3%

6%

6%

9%

8%

11%

14%

12%

12%

13%

18%

18%

31%

32%

32%

29%

36%

45%

57%

66%

N EW F A C I L I TI ES

O THER

LO C A L C O MMUN I TY R ELA TIO NSHIPS

UV A HEA LTH S YS TEM

E N V I R ONMENT AL S US T AINAB IL IT Y

N EW A P P R O ACHES F O R TEA C HING/LEAR NING

A THLET I C EX C ELLENCE

UN D ER GR A DUATE R ES I DENTIAL EX P ERI EN CE

GLO B A L P R ES ENCE

GR A D UA TE A N D P R O F ESSIO NAL S TUD ENTS

S C I EN CES A N D TEC HN OLOGY

A D V I SI NG

P R E S ER VING HI S T O RI C B UI L D INGS /GRO UNDS

B R O A D -B ASE D L I B ER AL A R T S ED UC A T ION

S EC UR I NG R ES O UR CES/ FUND RAI SING

D I V ER S ITY, I N CLUSI ON, A N D EQ UI TY

R ES EA R CH A N D S C HO LA RSHIP

A C C ES S A N D A F F OR DAB IL ITY

R EC R UI T I NG/RETAINI NG HI GH -Q UALITY F A C ULTY

R EMA I N ING A LEA D ER I N N A TI ONAL HI GHER ED UC A TION

ALUMNUS/A

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 9: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

“Good Judgment and Decision-making Skills” and “Effective Spokesperson, Able to

Articulate a Compelling Vision” identified as most important personal characteristics

9

8%

13%

15%

20%

29%

34%

41%

43%

47%

49%

49%

52%

55%

OT H ER

G LOB AL OUT LOOK

APPR EC IAT ION FOR SH AR ED G OV ER N AN CE

PR IOR C ON N EC T ION T O UV A

COMMITMENT TO UNDER G R ADUATES

AMB IT ION T O ADV AN C E T H E UN IV ER SIT Y

AB IL IT Y T O ASSEMB LE/LEAD A ST R ON G T EAM

LEADER SH IP SK ILLS

PEOPLE SK ILLS

C OMMIT MEN T T O AC ADEMIC MISS ION

FOR WAR D T H IN K IN G , C R EAT IV E , IN N OV AT IV E

EFFEC T IV E SPOK ESPER SON

G OOD JUDG MEN T AN D DEC IS ION - MAK IN G SK ILLS

WHAT ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR THE NEX T PRESIDENT TO HAVE IN ORDER TO BE SUCCESSFUL? (SELECT UP TO FIVE )

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 10: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Most important personal characteristics by respondent affiliation

category

10

FACULTY STAFF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTGRADUATE STUDENT

PARENT ALUMNUS/A FULL SETALL OTHERS

1) Academic outlook/ commitment to academic mission: 67%

2) Effective/compelling spokesperson: 57%

3) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 52%

1) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 60%

2) People skills; ability to connect with people of different backgrounds: 60%

3) Forward thinking, creative, innovative: 56%

1) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 50%

2) Forward thinking, creative, innovative: 49%

3) People skills; ability to connect with people of different backgrounds: 48%

1) People skills; ability to connect with people of different backgrounds: 58%

2) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 54%

3) Forward thinking, creative, innovative: 54%

1) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 55%

2) Effective/compelling spokesperson: 54%

3) Academic outlook/ commitment to academic mission: 50%

1) Effective/compelling spokesperson: 59%

2) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 55%

3) Academic outlook/ commitment to academic mission: 50%

1) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 53%

2) Ability to assemble/lead a strong team: 49%

3) Academic outlook/ commitment to academic mission: 46%

1) Good judgment/decision-making skills: 55%

2) Effective/compelling spokesperson: 52%

3) Forward thinking, creative, innovative: 49% / Academic outlook/ commitment to academic mission: 49%

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 11: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Most important personal characteristics by affiliation category

11

9%

13%

35%

9%

22%

25%

32%

35%

46%

67%

44%

57%

52%

O THER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC T ION T O UV A

C O MMI TMEN T TO UN D ER GR AD UATES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I TY TO A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S TR O N G TEA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION -MA KING S K I LLS

FACULTY

11%

16%

13%

12%

20%

28%

49%

41%

60%

44%

56%

54%

60%

O THER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC TION TO UV A

C O MMI TMEN T TO UN D ER GR AD UATES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I TY TO A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S TR O N G TEA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION -MA KING S K I LLS

STAFF

7%

10%

6%

25%

38%

29%

50%

49%

37%

50%

43%

59%

55%

O THER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC TION TO UV A

C O MMI TMEN T TO UN D ER GR AD UATES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I T Y T O A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S T R O N G T EA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION-MA KING S K I LLS

PARENT

12%

17%

21%

15%

19%

42%

36%

40%

48%

46%

49%

44%

50%

O THER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC TION TO UV A

C O MMI TMEN T TO UN D ER GR AD UATES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I TY TO A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S TR O N G TEA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION-MA KING S K I LLS

GRADUATE STUDENT

7%

18%

15%

18%

39%

45%

30%

37%

58%

42%

54%

42%

54%

O T HER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC TION TO UV A

C O MMI T MEN T T O UN D ER GR AD UAT ES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I TY TO A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S TR O N G TEA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION-MA KING S K I LLS

UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT

8%

12%

15%

24%

26%

33%

43%

45%

44%

50%

49%

54%

55%

O THER

GLO B A L O UTLO O K

A P P R ECIA TI ON F O R S HA R ED GO V ERN ANCE

P R I O R C O N NEC TION TO UV A

C O MMI TMEN T TO UN D ER GR AD UATES

A MB I T I ON TO A D V ANC E THE UN I V ER SI TY

A B I L I TY TO A S S EMB LE/LEAD A S TR O N G TEA M

LEA D ER S HIP S K I LLS

P EO P LE S K I LLS

C O MMI TMEN T TO A C A D EMIC MI S S I ON

F O R WA R D THI N KING, C R EATIVE , I N N OVATIVE

EF F EC TI VE S P O KESP ER SO N

GO O D J UD GMEN T A N D D EC I S ION-MA KING S K I LLS

ALUMNUS/A

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 12: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

“Leadership of Complex Organizations” and “Background in

Academia” identified as top priorities

12

7%

8%

11%

27%

27%

34%

34%

53%

76%

OTHER

KNOWLEDGE OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS

KNOWLEDGE OF ACADEMIC HEALTH SYSTEMS

EXPERIENCE OUTSIDE OF ACADEME

PUBLIC SERVICE EXPERIENCE

FUNDRAIS ING EXPERIENCE

UNDERSTANDING ACADEMIC RESEARCH

BACKGROUND IN ACADEM IA

LEADERSHIP OF COM PLEX ORGANIZATIONS

WHAT ARE THE AREAS OF EXPERIENCE YOU WOULD MOST LIKE TO SEE IN THE NEXT PRESIDENT? (SELECT UP TO THREE)

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 13: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Most important areas of experience by respondent affiliation

category

13

FACULTY STAFF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTGRADUATE STUDENT

PARENT ALUMNUS/A FULL SETALL OTHERS

1) Background in academia: 76%

2) Understanding of academic research: 64%

3) Leadership of complex organizations: 55%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 72%

2) Background in academia: 58%

3) Understanding of academic research: 40%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 66%

2) Background in academia: 49%

3) Understanding of academic research: 43%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 71%

2) Background in academia: 59%

3) Public service experience: 47%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 83%

2) Background in academia: 52%

3) Fundraising experience: 38%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 80%

2) Background in academia: 48%

3) Fundraising experience: 41%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 70%

2) Fundraising experience: 48%

3) Background in academia: 42%

1) Leadership of complex organizations: 76%

2) Background in academia: 53%

3) Understanding academic research: 34% / Fundraising Experience: 34%

Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 14: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Word cloud: additional thoughts on the presidential search

14 Source: University of Virginia Presidential Search Survey; Spring 2017Note: Percentages represent percent of survey respondents who selected a given answer choice

Page 15: SURVEY RESULTS - presidentialsearch.virginia.edu · 5/18/2017  · SURVEY RESULTS. The survey had a total of 4,584 respondents 2 242 246 378 521 544 665 1988 GRADUATE STUDENT FACULTY

Presidential Search Survey Results: May 2017