surface acoustic waves and saw materials

Upload: vivix-hg

Post on 01-Jun-2018

226 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Surface Acoustic Waves and SAW Materials

    1/15

  • 8/9/2019 Surface Acoustic Waves and SAW Materials

    2/15

    5 8 2

    PROCEEDINGS

    OF THE IEEE, MAY 1976

    1

    auk

    lineartrain-mechanical dis-

    ski =-

    -x, :

    placement elations (2 1

    aD,

    axi

    _ -

    -0

    derived from Maxwell 's equations

    acp underheuasi-staticssumption3)

    E,. =--

    ax i

    q = p '

    s

    - '

    vkllniiEn

    lineariezoelectricon- (4 )

    D~ = e;kl skl+ ,$ En

    stitutive elations

    where

    T

    is the stress,

    p

    the mass densi ty, u he m echanical dis-

    placement,

    S

    thestrain,

    D

    the electricdisplacement, E the

    electric field, and cp the electric potentia l. The primed quanti-

    t ies, tha t

    is

    the elastic constants

    (c j jk l ) ,

    the piezoelectric con-

    stants

    (e ;k ) ,

    and the dielectric constants

    ( ~ k ) ,

    efer to a ro-

    ta ted oordinate ystemhroughheEulerransformation

    mat r ix [6 ] inwhich wave propa gation will alwaysbealong

    the 1 di rec t ion . No te tha t the summ at ion convent ion (over

    1,

    2, 3) for repeated indices is employed.

    By subst i tut ion, (1) through (4) can be reduced o

    Ckkll(k,li

    +

    e i i iP ,k i

    =

    pu i ,

    j

    =

    1, , 3

    ( 5 )

    e:kluk,li- Ei'kV,ki = 0.

    (6 )

    Thedotnotation refers to differentia t ionwi th espect to

    t ime, while an ndexprecededbyacommadenotesdiffer-

    entia t ion with respect to a space coordinate .

    Equa t ions (1) through (6) a re , of course, valid only within

    the crystalline substrate, i .e., fo r x3 > 0 as defined in Fig. 3.

    This figure also defines the geometry under considerat ion and

    illustrates the meaning of

    o = 0,

    and

    wh =

    corresponding

    to a horted urface nd ree urface, respectively. Fo r

    - h Q x3

    4

    3

    -

    o L i N b O ,

    I

    B i , , G c 0 2 0

    :

    :

    500

    lo00 1500 2000

    3

    u)

    F R E Q U E N C Y ( M H + )

    Fig. 11. SAW attenuation due t o air loading as a function of frequency

    results

    for LiNbO, and Bi,, GeO,, .

    or materials listed in Fig. 10. It is interesting to note nearly identical

    so-called air loading can be eliminated by vacuum encapsula-

    tion or minimized by the use of a light

    gas.

    Propagation ossescanbedeterminedbydirectlyprobing

    the acoust icenergywitha aser

    [

    261.In hismethod, he

    surface wave deflectsasmall raction of the ncident ight,

    which is detected with a photomult iplier ube and measured

    with a lock-in amplifier. The deflected light is directly propor-

    t iona l to the acoustic power of th e surface wave.

    Air

    loadingcanbe determinedbyplacingdelay lines ina

    vacuum system and reducing th e pressure below 1 torr while

    mon itoring the change n nsert ion loss. Vacuu m attenuation

    is, of course,. the difference between th e total propa gation loss

    in

    air and the air loading component .

    Frequency dependence of vacuum attenu ation and air load-

    ing for three of the m ost popular SAW substrates [261, [291,

    [

    301 are illustrated in Figs. 10 and

    11 .

    Note the approximate

    f 2 dependence of the former and the linear dependence of the

    latter.This allows n mpirical xpression forpropagation

    loss to be derived from the data .

    Propagation

    Loss

    (dB//&) = (VAC) F 2 (AIR )

    F

    (26 )

    where F is in GHz. The coefficients VAC and AIR are tabu-

    lated orpopularsubstratesat heend of thispaper.Equa-

    t ion

    ( 2 6 )

    would be used , for example, when designing filters

    having particular bandpass characteristics.

    DIFFRACTION ND

    BEAM

    STEERING

    Parabolic Diffraction Theory

    Diffract ion of surface waves is aphysicalconsequence of

    their propagation and can vary considerably depending upon

    the anisotropy of the substrate chosen. In fact , i t is the slope

    of the power flow angle which determin es the extent of bo t h

    diffract ion nd beam teering [3 1] . There is annherent

    tradeoff between these two impo rtant sources f loss.

    A useful heory for calculating diffraction fields when the

    velocity anisotropy near pure-mode axes can be approxim ated

    by a parabola has been developed by Cohen [3 2 ]. By using a

    small angle appro ximatio n, he show ed hat for certain cases,

    the higher orders of t he expressio n for the velocity could be

    neglected past the second order . That is,

    where y = &$/a6 and

    Bo

    is the angular orientat ion of the pure-

    mode axis. By comparing hesespproximations to an exact

    solut ion orelectromagneticdiffract ion nuniaxially aniso-

    tropicmedia,Cohenshowed that he diffraction ntegral re-

    duces to Fresnel's integral with the follow ing change

    z^ =z^ll

    + y l .

    28)

    Szabo and Slobodnik

    [

    3 1 ] in t roduced the absolute magni tude

    signs to account for hose materia ls having

    y