supply_chain_or_ms[1].pdf
TRANSCRIPT
1
Supply Chain Management
M. Eric Johnson
David F. Pyke
The Tuck School of BusinessDartmouth College
Hanover, NH 03755603 (646) 2136
July 27, 1999
2
Introduction
Supply chain management (SCM) is the term used to describe the management of the flow of
materials, information, and funds across the entire supply chain, from suppliers to component producers
to final assemblers to distribution (warehouses and retailers), and ultimately to the consumer.1 In fact, it
often includes after-sales service and returns or recycling. Figure 1 is a schematic of a supply chain. In
contrast to multiechelon inventory management, which coordinates inventories at multiple locations,
SCM typically involves coordination of information and materials among multiple firms.
Supply chain management has generated much interest in recent years for a number of reasons.
Many managers now realize that actions taken by one member of the chain can influence the
profitability of all others in the chain.2 Firms are increasingly thinking in terms of competing as part of
a supply chain against other supply chains, rather than as a single firm against other individual firms.
Also, as firms successfully streamline their own operations, the next opportunity for improvement is
through better coordination with their suppliers and customers. The costs of poor coordination can be
extremely high. In the Italian pasta industry, consumer demand is quite steady throughout the year.
However, because of trade promotions, volume discounts, long lead times, full-truckload discounts, and
end-of-quarter sales incentives the orders seen at the manufacturers are highly variable (Hammond
(1994)). In fact, the variability increases in moving up the supply chain from consumer to grocery store
to distribution center to central warehouse to factory, a phenomenon that is often called the bullwhip
effect (see Figure 2 as an example). The bullwhip effect has been experienced by many students playing
the “Beer Distribution Game.” (Sterman (1989); Sterman (1992); Chen & Samroengraja (2000); Jacobs
(2000)) The costs of this variability are high -- inefficient use of production and warehouse resources,
1 Much of the material in this article is based on Chapter 12 of Silver, Pyke, & Peterson (1998) and Johnson & Pyke(2000a).
3
high transportation costs, and high inventory costs, to name a few. Acer America, Inc. sacrificed $20
million in profits by paying $10 million for air freight to keep up with surging demand, and then paying
$10 million more later when that inventory became obsolete.3
It seems that integration, long the dream of management gurus, has finally been sinking
into the minds of western managers. Some would argue that managers have long been interested
in integration, but the lack of information technology made it impossible to implement a more
“systems-oriented” approach. Clearly industrial dynamics researchers dating back to the 1950’s
(Forrester (1958); Forrester (1961)) have maintained that supply chains should be viewed as an
integrated system. With the recent explosion of inexpensive information technology, it seems
only natural that business would become more supply chain focused. However, while
technology is clearly an enabler of integration, it alone can not explain the radical organizational
changes in both individual firms and whole industries. Changes in both technology and
management theory set the stage for integrated supply chain management. One reason for the
change in management theory is the power shift from manufacturers to retailers. Wal-Mart, for
instance, has forced many manufacturers to improve their management of inventories, and even
to manage inventories of their products at Wal-Mart.
While integration, information technology and retail power may be key catalysts in the
surge of interest surrounding supply chains, eBusiness is fueling even stronger excitement.
eBusiness facilitates the virtual supply chain, and as companies manage these virtual networks,
the importance of integration is magnified. Firms like Amazon.com are superb at managing the
2 Certain industries use other terms in place of SCM. For example, many grocery industry executives are pursuingefficient consumer response (ECR), the equivalent of just-in-time distribution or “continuous replenishment.” Weconsider initiatives such as ECR to be aspects of supply chain management.3 See Business Week (September 30, 1996), pg. 72. See also Towill & DelVecchio (1994); Berry, Naim, & Towill(1995); and Buzzell & Ortmeyer (1995).
4
flow of information and funds, via the Internet and electronic funds transfer. Now, the challenge
is to efficiently manage the flow of products.
Some would argue that the language and metaphors are wrong. “Chains” evoke images of linear,
unchanging, and powerless. “Supply” feels pushy and reeks of mass production rather than mass
customization. Better names, like “demand networks” or “customer driven webs” have been proposed
by many a potential book author hoping to invent a new trend. Yet, for now, the name “supply chain”
seems to have stuck. And under any name, the future of supply chain management appears bright.
Component Producer (s)
Warehouse Warehouse
Retailoutlets
Customers
Outside supplier (s)
Landfill
Final Assembly
Figure 1: A Schematic of a Supply Chain
5
Figure 2: An Illustration of the Bullwhip Effect
Grocery Store Order Size Units
200
400
600
800
1 3 5 7 9 11
Month
Un
its
Distribution Center Order Size Units
200
400
600
800
1 3 5 7 9 11
Month
Un
its
Central Warehouse Order Size Units
200300400500600700
1 3 5 7 9 11
Month
Un
its
6
Key Components of Supply Chain Management
Supply chain management is an enormous topic covering multiple disciplines and
employing many quantitative and qualitative tools. Within the last few years, several textbooks
on supply chain have arrived on the market providing both managerial overviews and detailed
technical treatments. For examples of managerial introductions to supply chain see Copacino
(1997), Fine (1998) and Handfield & Nichols (1998), and for logistics texts see Lambert, Stock,
Ellram, & Stockdale (1997) and Ballou (1998). For more technical, model-based treatments see
Silver et al. (1998) and Simchi-Levi, Kaminsky, & Simchi-Levi (1998). Tayur, Magazine, &
Ganeshan (1999) is an extensive collection of research papers while Johnson & Pyke (2000b) is
a collection papers on teaching supply chain management. Also, there are several casebooks that
give emphasis to global management issues including Taylor (1997), Flaherty (1996), and
Dornier, Ernst, Fender, & Kouvelis (1998). Introductory articles include Cooper, Lambert, &
Pagh (1997b), Davis (1993), Johnson (1998a), and Lee & Billington (1992).
To help order our discussion, we have divided supply chain management into twelve
areas.4 We identified these twelve areas from our own experience teaching and researching
supply chain management, from analysis of syllabi and research papers on supply chain, and
from our discussions with managers. Each area represents a supply chain issue facing the firm.
For any particular problem or issue, managers may apply analysis or decision support tools. For
each of the twelve areas, we provide a brief description of the basic content and refer the reader
to a few research papers that apply. We also mention likely Operations Research based tools that
may aid analysis and decision support. We do not provide an exhaustive review of the research
literature, but rather provide a few references to help the reader get started in an area. For a more
4 See Johnson & Pyke (2000a) for a list of teaching cases and popular press articles that fit within each area.
7
detailed review of recent research and teaching in supply chain management see Ganeshan, Jack,
& Magazine (1999) and Johnson & Pyke (2000a) respectively.
The twelve categories we define are
• location
• transportation and logistics
• inventory and forecasting
• marketing and channel restructuring
• sourcing and supplier management
• information and electronic mediated environments
• product design and new product introduction
• service and after sales support
• reverse logistics and green issues
• outsourcing and strategic alliances
• metrics and incentives
• global issues.
Location pertains to both qualitative and quantitative aspects of facility location
decisions. This includes models of facility location, geographic information systems (GIS),
country differences, taxes and duties, transportation costs associated with certain locations, and
government incentives (Hammond & Kelly (1990)). Exchange rate issues fall in this category,
as do economies and diseconomies of scale and scope. Decisions at this level set the physical
structure of the supply chain and therefore establish constraints for more tactical decisions.
8
Binary integer programming models play a role here, as do simple spreadsheet models and
qualitative analyses. There are many advanced texts specially dedicated to the modeling aspects
of location (Drezner (1996)) and most books on logistics also cover the subject. Simchi-Levi et
al. (1998) present a substantial treatment of GIS while Dornier et al. (1998) dedicate a chapter to
issues of taxes, duties, exchange rates, and other global location issues (Brush, Maritan, &
Karnani (1999)). Ballou & Masters (1999) examine several software products that provide
optimization tools for solving industrial location problems.
The transportation and logistics category encompasses all issues related to the flow of
goods through the supply chain, including transportation, warehousing, and material handling.
This category includes many of the current trends in transportation management including
vehicle routing (Bodin (1990), Gendreau, Laport, & Seguin (1996), and Anily & Bramel (1999)),
dynamic fleet management with global positioning systems, and merge-in-transit. Also included
are topics in warehousing and distribution such as cross docking (Kopczak, Lee, & Whang
(1995)) and materials handling technologies for sorting, storing, and retrieving products
(Johnson & Brandeau (1999) and Johnson (1998b)).
Because of globalization and the spread of outsourced logistics, this category has
received much attention in recent years. However, we will define a separate category to examine
issues specifically related to outsourcing and logistics alliances. Both deterministic (such as
linear programming and the traveling salesman problem) and stochastic optimization models
(stochastic routing and transportation models with queueing) often are used here, as are
spreadsheet models and qualitative analysis. Recent management literature has examined the
changes within the logistics functions of many firms as the result of functional integration (Greis
9
& Kasarda (1997)) and the role of logistics in gaining competitive advantage (Fuller, O'Conor, &
Rawlinson (1993)).
Inventory and forecasting includes traditional inventory and forecasting models.
Inventory costs are some of the easiest to identify and reduce when attacking supply chain
problems. Simple stochastic inventory models can identify the potential cost savings from, for
example, sharing information with supply chain partners (Lee & Nahmias (1993)), but more
complex models are required to coordinate multiple locations. A few years ago, multiechelon
inventory theory captured most of the research in this area that would apply to supply chains.
However, in nearly every case, multiechelon inventory models assume a single decision-maker.
Supply chains, unfortunately, confront the problem of multiple firms, each with its own decision-
maker and objectives. Of course there are many full texts on the subject such as Silver et al.
(1998) and Graves, Rinnooy Kan, & Zipkin (1993)). Useful managerial articles focusing on
inventory and forecasting include Davis (1993) and Fisher, Hammond, Obermeyer, & Raman
(1994).
Clark & Scarf (1960) perform one of the earliest studies in serial systems with
probabilistic demand. They introduce the concept of an imputed penalty cost, wherein a shortage
at a higher echelon generates an additional cost. This cost enables us to decompose the
multiechelon system into a series of stages so that, assuming centralized control and the
availability of global information, the ordering policies can be optimized. Lee & Whang (1999a)
and Chen (1996) both propose performance measurement schemes for individual managers that
allow for decentralized control (so that each manager makes decisions independently), and in
certain instances, local information only. The result is a solution that achieves the same optimal
solution as if we assumed centralized control and global information.
10
Marketing and channel restructuring includes fundamental thinking on supply chain
structure (Fisher (1997)) and covers the interface with marketing that emerges from having to
deal with downstream customers (Narus & Anderson (1996)). While the inventory category
addresses the quantitative side of these relationships, this category covers relationship
management, negotiations, and even the legal dimension. Most importantly, it examines the role
of channel management (Anderson, Day, & Rangan (1997)) and supply chain structure in light of
the well-studied phenomena of the bullwhip effect that was noted in the introduction.
The bullwhip effect has received enormous attention in the research literature. Many authors
have noted that central warehouses are designed to buffer the factory from variability in retail orders.
The inventory held in these warehouses should allow factories to smooth production while meeting
variable customer demand. However, empirical data suggests that exactly the opposite happens. (See
for example Blinder (1981), and Baganha & Cohen (1998).) Orders seen at the higher levels of the
supply chain exhibit more variability than those at levels closer to the customer. In other words, the
bullwhip effect is real. Typically causes include those noted in the introduction, as well as the fact that
retailers and distributors often over-react to shortages by ordering more than they need. Lee,
Padmanabhan, & Whang (1997) show how four rational factors help to create the bullwhip effect:
demand signal processing (if demand increases, firms order more in anticipation of further increases,
thereby communicating an artificially high level of demand); the rationing game (there is, or might be, a
shortage so a firm orders more than the actual forecast in the hope of receiving a larger share of the
items in short supply); order batching (fixed costs at one location lead to batching of orders); and
manufacturer price variations (which encourage bulk orders). The latter two factors generate large
orders that are followed by small orders, which implies increased variability at upstream locations.
11
Some recent innovations, such as increased communication about consumer demand, via
electronic data interchange (EDI) and the Internet, and everyday low pricing5 (EDLP) (to
eliminate forward buying of bulk orders), can mitigate the bullwhip effect.6 In fact, the number
of firms ordering, and receiving orders, via EDI and the Internet is exploding. The information
available to supply chain partners, and the speed with which it is available, has the potential to
radically reduce inventories and increase customer service.7 Other initiatives can also mitigate
the bullwhip effect. For example, changes in pricing and trade promotions (Buzzell, Quelch, &
Salmon (1990)) and channel initiatives, such as vendor managed inventory (VMI), coordinated
forecasting and replenishment (CFAR), and continuous replenishment (Fites (1996), Verity
(1996), Waller, Johnson, & Davis (1999)), can significantly reduce demand variance. Vendor
Managed Inventory is one of the most widely discussed partnering initiatives for improving
multi-firm supply chain efficiency. Popularized in the late 1980s by Wal-Mart and Procter &
Gamble, VMI became one of the key programs in the grocery industry’s pursuit of “efficient
consumer response” and the garment industry’s “quick response.” Successful VMI initiatives
have been trumpeted by other companies in the United States, including Campbell Soup and
Johnson & Johnson, and by European firms like Barilla (the pasta manufacturer).
In a VMI partnership, the supplier—usually the manufacturer but sometimes a reseller or
distributor—makes the main inventory replenishment decisions for the consuming organization.
This means the supplier monitors the buyer’s inventory levels (physically or via electronic
5 See Bell, Ho, & Tang (1998a; Bell, Ho, & Tang (1998b) for a discussion of EDLP versus High-Low pricing. Theyshow with a simple model that High-Low pricers can charge a higher average price without risking the loss ofrational customers.6 In addition, Baganha & Cohen (1998) note that, if locations that are designed to buffer the factory from variabilityin retail orders follow the optimal policy, the variance can in fact be reduced. In particular, these locations shouldaccount for autocorrelation in the demand process; that is, if a retailer orders today, it is unlikely that she will orderin the next few days. See Bourland, Powell, & Pyke (1996); Srinivasan, Kekre, & Mukhopadhyay (1994), and Lee,So, & Tang (1999).
12
messaging) and makes periodic resupply decisions regarding order quantities, shipping, and
timing. Transactions customarily initiated by the buyer (like purchase orders) are initiated by the
supplier instead. Indeed, the purchase order acknowledgment from the supplier may be the first
indication that a transaction is taking place; an advance shipping notice informs the buyer of
materials in transit. Thus the manufacturer is responsible for both its own inventory and the
inventory stored at is customers’ distribution centers (Figure 3).
Mfg-DC
Manufacturer
VMI-DC
VMI-DC
VMI-DC
VMI-DC
Retail
Retail
Retail
Retail
Retail
3rd-DC
Retail
Retail
Retail
Figure 3: Typical VMI implementation (adapted from Waller et al. (1999)).
Because many of these initiatives involve channel partnerships and distribution agreements, this
category also contains important information on pricing, along with anti-trust and other legal issues
7 See for example Moinzadeh & Aggarwal (1997) and Lee & Whang (1999b). Milgrom & Roberts (1988) note thatinventory and information are substitutes.
13
(Train (1998)). These innovations require interfirm, and often intrafirm, cooperation and coordination
that can be difficult to achieve.
While marketing focuses downstream in the supply chain, sourcing and supplier
management looks upstream to suppliers. Make/buy decisions (Venkatesan (1992), Carroll
(1993), Christensen (1994), Quinn & Hilmer (1994), Kelley (1995), and Robertson & Langlois
(1995)) fall into this category, as does global sourcing (Little (1995) and Pyke (1994)). The
location category addresses the location of a firm’s own facilities, while this category pertains to
the location of the firm’s suppliers. Supplier relationship management falls into this category as
well (McMillan (1990) and Womack, Jones, & Roos (1991)). Some firms are putting part
specifications on the web so that dozens of suppliers can bid on jobs. GE, for instance, has
developed a trading process network that allows many more suppliers to bid than was possible
before. The automotive assemblers have developed a similar capability; and independent
Internet firms, such as Digital Market, are providing services focused on certain product
categories. Other firms are moving in the opposite direction by reducing the number of
suppliers, in some cases to a sole source (Helper & Sako (1995) and Cusumano & Takeishi
(1991)). Determining the number of suppliers and the best way to structure supplier
relationships is becoming an important topic in supply chains (Cohen & Agrawal (1996), Dyer
(1996), Magretta (1998), and Pyke (1998)).
Much of the research in this area makes use of game theory to understand supplier
relationships, contracts, and performance metrics. See, for instance, Cachon & Lariviere (1996);
Cachon (1997); and Tsay, Hahmias, & Agrawal (1999).
The information and electronic mediated environments category addresses long-standing
applications of information technology to reduce inventory (Woolley (1997)) and the rapidly
14
expanding area of electronic commerce (Benjamin & Wigand (1997) and Schonfeld (1998)).
Often this subject may take a more systems orientation, examining the role of systems science
and information within a supply chain (Senge (1990)). Such a discussion naturally focuses
attention on integrative ERP software such as SAP (Whang, Gilland, & Lee (1995)), Baan and
Oracle, as well as supply chain offerings such as i2’s Rhythm and Peoplesoft’s Red Pepper. The
many supply chain changes wrought by electronic commerce are particularly interesting to
examine, including both the highly publicized retail channel changes (like Amazon.com) and the
more substantial business to business innovations (like the GE trading process network). It is
here that we interface most directly with colleagues in information technology and strategy,
which again creates opportunities for cross-functional integration (Lee & Whang (1999b)).
Product design and new product introduction deals with design issues for mass
customization, delayed differentiation, modularity and other issues for new product introduction.
With the increasing supply chain demands of product variety (Gilmore & Pine (1997)) and
customization (McCutcheon, Raturi, & Meredith (1994)), there is an increasing body of research
available. One of the most exciting applications of "supply chain thinking" is the increased use
of postponed product differentiation (Feitzinger & Lee (1997)). Traditionally, products destined
for world markets would be customized at the factory to suit local market tastes. While a
customized product is desirable, managing worldwide inventory is often a nightmare. Using
postponement the product is redesigned so that it can be customized for local tastes in the
distribution channel. The same generic product is produced at the factory and held throughout
the world (Figure 4). Thus if the French version selling well, but the German version is not,
German product can be quickly shipped to France and customized for the French market.
15
Figure 4: Using postponement a product destined for both US and Europe markets isredesigned so that local content can be added to a common platform within distribution
(adapted from Johnson & Anderson (1999)).
Manufacturer4
3
21
US Distribution
Europe Distribution
43
21
43
21
Product Platform
Multiple SKUs -
Customers
Customers
at DC
Manufacturer
US Distribution
Europe Distribution
43
21
43
21
Customers
Customers43
21
43
21
16
For these problems, we find an interface with engineering and development, with clear
implications for product cost and inventory savings. Stochastic inventory models are often used
to identify some of the benefits of these initiatives (Lee, Billington, & Carter (1993)). Also
important are issues related to product design (Ulrich & Ellison (1999) and Robertson & Ulrich
(1998)), managing product variety (Fisher, Ramdas, & Ulrich (1999)) and managing new
product introduction and product rollover (Billington, Lee, & Tang (1998)).
The service and after sales support category addresses the critical, but often overlooked,
problem of providing service and service parts (Cohen & Lee (1990)). Some leading firms, such
as Saturn and Caterpillar, build their reputations on their ability in this area, and this capability
generates significant sales (Cohen, Zheng, & Agrawal (1997)). Stochastic inventory models for
slow-moving items fall into this category, and there are many papers on this topic related to
inventory management (Williams (1984); Cohen, Kleindorfer, & Lee (1986)) and forecasting
(Johnston & Boylan (1996)). While industry practice still shows much room for improvement
(Cohen et al. (1997)), several well-known firms have shown how spare parts can be managed
more effectively (Cohen, Kamesam, Kleindorfer, Lee, & Tekerian (1990); Cohen, Kleindorfer,
& Lee (1992); and Cohen, Zheng, & Wang (1999)).
Reverse logistics and green issues are emerging dimensions of supply chain management
(Marien (1998)). This area examines both environmental issues (Herzlinger (1994) and the
reverse logistics issues of product returns (Padmanabhan & Png (1995), Clendenin (1997), and
Rudi & Pyke (1998)). Because of legislation and consumer pressure, the growing importance of
these issues is evident to most managers. Managers are being compelled to consider the most
efficient and environmentally friendly way to deal with product recovery, and researchers have
begun significant effort in modeling these systems.
17
The term “product recovery” encompasses the handling of all used and discarded products,
components and materials. Thierry, Salomon, Van Nunen, & Van Wassenhove (1995) note that product
recovery management attempts to recover as much economic value as possible, while reducing the total
amount of waste. They also provide a framework and a set of definitions that can help managers think
about the issues in an organized way (see Figure 5). These authors examine the differences among
various product recovery options including repair, refurbishing, remanufacturing, cannibalization, and
recycling. The whole process of manufacturing begins, of course, with product design. Today, firms
are beginning to consider design for the environment (DFE) and design for disassembly (DFD) in their
product development processes. Unfortunately, AT&T discovered that designing products for reuse can
result in more materials and complexity, thereby violating other environmental goals. (See Frankel
(1996), who also reports on product takeback and recycling initiatives in numerous countries.)
RawMaterials
PartsFabrication
Modules Subassembly
Product Assembly
Distribution Users
Recycle Cannibalize Remanufacture Refurbish Repair Reuse
Landfill
Figure 5: Product Recovery Options (adapted from Thierry et al. (1995)).
The analysis of the recovery situation is considerably more complicated than that of
consumables. Normally, in a recovery situation some items cannot be recovered, so the number of units
demanded is not balanced completely by the return of reusable units. Thus, in addition to recovered
units, a firm must also purchase some new units from time to time. Consequently, even at a single
location, there are five decision variables: (1) how often to review the stock status, (2) when to recover
18
returned units, (3) how many to recover at a time, (4) when to order new units, and (5) how many to
order. When there are multiple locations, the firm must decide how many good units to deploy to a
central warehouse, and how many to deploy to each retailer or field stocking location.
With consumable items the lead time to the retailers is a transportation time from the warehouse
plus a random component, depending on whether the warehouse has stock. With recoverable items, the
lead time is the transportation time plus the time to recovery, if the warehouse does not have stock. So
in some cases the two systems can be treated in almost the same way. However, if the recovery facility
has limited capacity, or if the number of items in the system is small, the systems will differ
significantly. For example, if many items have failed and are now in recovery, they cannot be in the
field generating failures. Therefore, the demand rate at the warehouse will decline. In a consumable
system, it is usually assumed that the demand rate does not depend on how many items have been
consumed.
Most of the research in this area relevant to this article concerns products and packaging after
manufacturing has been completed. For example, a large U. S. chemical company gained significant
market share in water treatment chemicals by delivering its products in reusable containers. The
customers (hospitals and other large institutions, for example) need never touch the chemicals or deal
with the disposal of used containers. This problem has been addressed by Goh & Varaprasad (1986);
Kelle & Silver (1989); and Castillo & Cochran (1996), among others.
Some products that are not reused as is can be disassembled so that some of the parts can be used
in remanufactured products. Muckstadt & Isaac (1981) report on a model developed in connection with
a manufacturer of reprographic equipment. There is a single location with two types of inventory:
serviceable and repairable. Demands for serviceable units and returns of repairable units occur
probabilistically, specifically, according to independent Poisson processes with rates D and fD,
respectively (where f is a fraction). In addition, repairs are done on a continuous, first come-first served
basis (for example, at a local machine shop). Any demands for serviceable units, when none is
available, are backordered at a cost per unit short per unit time. Purchases of new stock from outside
19
involve a known lead time. With respect to purchase decisions, a continuous review (s,Q) system is
used; specifically, when the inventory position drops to s or lower, a quantity Q is purchased.
Inderfurth (1997) extends the Muckstadt & Isaac model to a remanufacturing problem in which
there are two decisions each period: how many returned products to remanufacture (the remainder will
be disposed of), and how many new parts to procure. In this system, returned products arrive
probabilistically and are either remanufactured or thrown away. (In other words, there is no stock of
returned products.) Newly procured products are stored with remanufactured products in a finished
goods inventory that serves demand that arrives probabilistically. There are per-unit costs to procure,
remanufacture, and dispose, and holding costs are charged against ending inventory each period. For the
case of equal lead times to remanufacture and to procure, Inderfurth shows that the structure of the
optimal policy is based on two parameters, Lt and Ut, in each period t. To describe the policy, we need
some notation:
dt = the number of units to be disposed of in period t
pt = the number of units to procure in period t
IPt = the inventory position at the beginning of period t = stock on hand (which includes
products returned this period and finished goods inventory) + procurement orders outstanding +
remanufacturing orders outstanding – backordered demand
The optimal policy is then:
pt = Lt – IPt and dt = 0 for IPt < Lt;
pt = 0 and dt = 0 for Lt >= IPt <= Ut;
pt = 0 and dt = IPt – Ut for IPt > Ut
In words, if the inventory position is lower than the lower limit, Lt, order-up-to Lt and do not
dispose of any units. If the inventory position is higher than the upper limit, Ut, dispose “down to” Ut
and do not procure any units. Otherwise, do not buy or dispose. (Again, all returned units, not disposed
20
of, are remanufactured.) Inderfurth points out that when one permits a stock of returned units waiting
for disposal or remanufacturing, or when the lead times to procure and remanufacture are different, the
policy is similar but more complex.
van der Laan, Dekker, Salomon, & Ridder (1996) propose a policy for a continuous review
version of this problem. Thierry et al. (1995) looks at the strategic issues related to product recovery.
See also Heyman (1977); Penev & de Ron (1996) who study the disassembly process, and van der Laan
et al. (1996), van der Laan, Salomon, & Dekker (1997); van der Laan, Salomon, & Dekker (1999);
Ferrer (1995); Richter (1996); Guide & Spencer (1997); and Taleb, Gupta, & Brennan (1997) who study
other aspects of the remanufacturing process. Other reverse logistics issues are also examined by Carter
& Ellram (1998). Fleischmann et al. (1997) provide a review of quantitative models for reverse
logistics.
Outsourcing and strategic alliances examines the supply chain impact of outsourcing
logistics services . With the rapid growth in third party logistics providers, there is a large and
expanding group of technologies and services to be examined. These include fascinating
initiatives such as supplier hubs managed by third parties. The rush to create strategic
relationships with logistics providers and the many well-published failures have raised questions
about the future of such relationships. (See Bowersox (1990), (1998).) In any case, outsourcing
continues to raise many interesting issues (Cooper, Ellram, Gardner, & Hanks (1997a)).
Metrics and incentives examines measurement and other organizational and economic
issues. This category includes both measurement within the supply chain (Meyer (1997)) and
industry benchmarking ((1994), (1997)). Because metrics are fundamental to business
management, there are many reading materials outside of the supply chain literature, including
accounting texts for instance. Several recent articles concentrate on the link between
21
performance measurement and supply chain improvement (O'Laughlin (1997), Johnson & Davis
(1998)).
Finally, global issues examines how all of the above categories are affected when
companies operate in multiple countries. This category goes beyond country specific issues, to
encompass issues related to crossboarder distribution and sourcing (Kouvelis (1999)). For
example, currency exchange rates, duties & taxes, freight forwarding, customs issues,
government regulation, and country comparisons are all included. Note that the location
category, when applied in a global context, also addresses some of these issues. (Cohen &
Huchzermeier (1999)and Huchzermeier & Cohen (1996); Arntzen, Brown, Harrison, & Trafton
(1995).) As we mentioned earlier, there are several texts devoted to global management. Many
recent articles also examine challenges in specific regions of the world (for example, Asia -- Lee
& Kopczak (1997) or Europe -- Sharman (1997)).
Conclusion
Supply chain management is an exploding field, both in research and in practice. Major
international consulting firms have developed large practices in the supply chain field, and the
number of research papers in the field is growing rapidly. Our treatment covered twelve areas
often seen in supply chain research and practice. These areas appear to be somewhat disparate,
but they are all linked by the integrated nature of the problems at hand. Firms operate in global
environments, deal with multiple suppliers and customers, are required to manage inventories in
new and innovative ways, and are faced with possible channel restructuring. The field promises
to continue growing as the research advances and as firms continue to apply new knowledge in
their global networks. Finally, as the Internet changes fundamental assumptions about business,
22
firms operating in supply chains will be required to understand this new phenomenon and
respond accordingly.
References
(1994). Integrated-supply-chain performance measurement. Council of Logistics Management Consortium, October.
(1997). The keys to unlocking your supply chain's competitive advantage. Pittiglio Rabin Todd & McGrath.
(1998). What is the future of third-party logistics. Supply Chain Management Review.
Anderson, E., Day, G. S., & Rangan, V. K. (1997). Strategic Channel Design. Sloan Management Review(Summer),
59-69.
Anily, S., & Bramel, J. (1999). Vehicle routing and the supply chain. In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, & R. Ganeshan
(Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (pp. 147-196). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Arntzen, B. C., Brown, G. G., Harrison, T. P., & Trafton, L. L. (1995). Global Supply Chain Management at Digital
Equipment Corporation. Interfaces, 25(1), 69-93.
Baganha, M. P., & Cohen, M. A. (1998). The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains. Operations
Research, 46(3 supp), S72-S83.
Ballou, R. H. (1998). Business Logistics Management: Planning, Organizing, and Controlling the Supply Chain.
(4th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
Ballou, R. H., & Masters, J. M. (1999). Facility Location Commercial Software Survey. Journal of Business
Logistics, 20(1), 215-232.
Bell, D. R., Ho, T., & Tang, C. (1998a). Determining Where to Shop: Fixed and Variable Costs of Shopping.
Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 352-369.
Bell, D. R., Ho, T., & Tang, C. (1998b). Rational Shopping Behavior and the Option Value of Variable Pricing.
Management Science, 44(12), S145-S160.
Benjamin, R., & Wigand, R. (1997). Electronic markets and virtual value chain on the info super highway. Sloan
Management Review, Winter, 62-72.
23
Berry, D., Naim, M., & Towill, D. (1995). Business Process Re-Engineering an Electronic Products Supply Chain.
Paper presented at the Manufacturing Engineering.
Billington, C., Lee, H. L., & Tang, C. S. (1998). Successful strategies for product rollovers. Sloan Management
Review, Spering, 23-30.
Blinder, A. S. (1981). Retail Inventory Investment and Business Fluctuations. Brookings Papers on Economic
Activity, 2, 443-505.
Bodin, L. D. (1990). Twenty Years of Routing and Scheduling. Operations Research, 39(4), 571-579.
Bourland, K., Powell, S., & Pyke, D. (1996). Exploiting Timely Demand Information to Reduce Inventories.
European Journal of Operational Research, 92(2), 239-253.
Bowersox, D. J. (1990). The strategic benefits of logistics alliances. Harvard Business Review, July/Aug, 36-45.
Brush, T. H., Maritan, C. A., & Karnani, A. (1999). The Plant Location Decision in Multinational Manufacturing
Firms: An Empirical Analysis of International Business and Manufacturing Strategy Perspectives.
Production and Operations Management, 8(2), 109-132.
Buzzell, R., & Ortmeyer, G. (1995). Channel Partnerships Streamline Distribution. Sloan Management Review,
Spring.
Buzzell, R., Quelch, J. A., & Salmon, W. J. (1990). The Costly Bargain of Trade Promotion. Harvard Business
Review, 68(2), 141-149.
Cachon, G. P. (1997). Stock wars: Inventory competition in a two echelon supply chain with multiple retailers.
Unpublished Working Paper, Duke University, Durham.
Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (1996). Capacity Choice and Allocation: Strategic Behavior and Supply Chain
Performance. Management Science, forthcoming.
Carroll, P. (1993). Big Blues. New York: Crown Publishers.
Carter, C. R., & Ellram, L. M. (1998). Reverse Logistics: A Review of the Literature and Framework for Future
Investigation. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(1), 85-102.
Castillo, E. D., & Cochran, J. K. (1996). Optimal Short Horizon Distribution Operations in Reusable Container
Systems. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, 48-60.
Chen, F. (1996). The Stationary Beer Game. Unpublished Working Paper, Columbia University, New York.
24
Chen, F., & Samroengraja, R. (2000). Information and Incentives in Supply Chain Management: The Stationary
Beer Games. POMS, forthcoming.
Christensen, C. M. (1994). The Drivers of Vertical Disintegration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Clark, A. J., & Scarf, H. (1960). Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem. Management Science,
6(4), 475-490.
Clendenin, J. A. (1997). Closing the supply chain loop: Reengineering the returns channel process. Internationl
Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 75-85.
Cohen, M., Kamesam, P. V., Kleindorfer, P., Lee, H., & Tekerian, A. (1990). Optimizer: IBM's Multi-Echelon
Inventory System for Managing Service Logistics. Interfaces, 20(1), 65-82.
Cohen, M., Kleindorfer, P., & Lee, H. (1986). Optimal Stocking Policies for Low Usage Items in Multi-Echelon
Inventory Systems. Naval Research Logistics, 33, 17-38.
Cohen, M. A., & Agrawal, N. (1996). An Empirical Investigation of Supplier Management Practices. In T. W. S.
Operations and Information Management Department, University of Pennsylvania (Ed.) .
Cohen, M. A., & Huchzermeier, A. (1999). Global Supply Chain Management: A Survey of Research and
Applications. In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, & R. Ganeshan (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain
Management (pp. 669-702). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Cohen, M. A., Kleindorfer, P., & Lee, H. L. (1992). Multi-item Service Constrained (s,S) Policies for Spare Parts
Logistics Systems. Naval Research Logistics, 39(4), 561-578.
Cohen, M. A., & Lee, H. L. (1990). Out of Touch With Customer Needs? Spare Parts and After Sales Service.
Sloan Management Review, 55-66.
Cohen, M. A., Zheng, Y.-S., & Agrawal, V. (1997). Service Parts Logistics: A Benchmark Analysis. IIE
Transactions, 29, 627-639.
Cohen, M. A., Zheng, Y.-S., & Wang, Y. (1999). Identifying Opportunities for Improving Teradyne's Service-Parts
Logistics System. Interfaces, forthcoming.
Cooper, M. C., Ellram, L. M., Gardner, J. T., & Hanks, A. M. (1997a). Meshing multiple alliances. Journal of
Business of Logistics, 18(1), 67-89.
Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997b). Supply chain management: More than a new name for
logistics. International Journal of Logistics Management, 8(1), 1-14.
25
Copacino, W. C. (1997). Supply chain management: The basics and beyond. Falls Creek, VA: St. Lucie Press.
Cusumano, M. A., & Takeishi, A. (1991). Supplier Relations and Management: A Survey of Japanese, Japanese-
Transplants, and U.S. Auto Plants. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Nov-Dec).
Davis, T. (1993). Effective Supply Chain Management. Sloan Management Review(Summer), 35-46.
Dornier, P., Ernst, R., Fender, M., & Kouvelis, P. (1998). Global operations and logistics: Text and cases. New
York, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Drezner, Z. (1996). Facility location: A survey of applications and methods. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
Dyer, J. H. (1996). How Chrysler Created an American Keiretsu. Harvard Business Review(July-August), 42-56.
Feitzinger, E., & Lee, H. L. (1997). Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: The power of postponement. Havard
Business Review, Jan-Feb, 116-121.
Ferrer, G. (1995). Parts Recovery Problem: The Value of Information in Remanufacturing . INSEAD, Technology
Management Area.
Fine, C. H. (1998). Clock Speed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Reading,
Massachusetts: Perseus Books.
Fisher, M., Ramdas, K., & Ulrich, K. (1999). Component sharing in the management of product variety: A study of
automotive braking systems. Management Science, 45(3), 297-315.
Fisher, M. L. (1997). What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? Harvard Business Review(Mar/Apr), 105-.
Fisher, M. L., Hammond, J. H., Obermeyer, W. R., & Raman, A. (1994). Making Supply Meet Demand in an
Uncertain World. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 83-93.
Fites, D. V. (1996). Make Your Dealers Your Partners. Harvard Business Review(March-April), 84-95.
Flaherty, M. T. (1996). Global Operations Management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fleischmann, M., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., Dekker, R., van der Laan, E., van Nunen, J. A. E. E., & Van
Wassenhove, L. N. (1997). Quantitative Models for Reverse Logistics: A Review. European Journal of
Operational Research, 103(1), 1-17.
Forrester, J. W. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review,
July/August, 37-66.
26
Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
Frankel, C. (1996). The Environment. IEEE Sprectrum, January, 76-81.
Fuller, J. B., O'Conor, J., & Rawlinson, R. (1993). Tailored logistics: The next advantage. Harvard Business
Review, May/June, 87-93.
Ganeshan, R., Jack, E., Magazine, M. & Stephens, P. (1999). A Taxonomic Review of Supply Chain Management
Research. In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, & R. Ganeshan (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain
Management (pp. 839-879). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gendreau, M., Laport, G., & Seguin, R. (1996). Stochastic Vehicle Routing. European Journal of Operational
Research, 88, 3-12.
Gilmore, J. H., & Pine, B. J. (1997). The four faces of mass customization. Harvard Business Reveiw, Jan-Feb, 91-
101.
Goh, T. N., & Varaprasad, N. (1986). A Statistical Methodology for the Analysis of the Life-Cycle of Reusable
Containers. IIE Transactions, 18(1), 42-47.
Graves, S., Rinnooy Kan, A., & Zipkin, P. (Eds.). (1993). Logistics of Production and Inventory. (Vol. 4).
Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-Holland).
Greis, N. P., & Kasarda, J. D. (1997). Enterprise logistics in the information era. California Management Review,
39(3), 55-78.
Guide, V. D. R., & Spencer, M. S. (1997). Rough-cut Capacity Planning for Remanufacturing Firms. Production
Planning & Control, 8(3), 237-244.
Hammond, J. H. (1994). Barilla SpA (A) . Harvard Business School: Case Number 9-694-046.
Hammond, J. H., & Kelly, M. (1990). Note on facility location. Unpublished Note, Harvard University, Cambridge,
MA.
Handfield, R. B., & Nichols, E. Z. (1998). Introduction to supply chain management. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
Helper, S., & Sako, M. (1995). Supplier Relations in Japan and the United States: Are They Converging? Sloan
Management Review, Spring, 77-84.
Herzlinger, R. (1994). The Challenges of Going Green. Harvard Business Review, July-August, 37-50.
27
Heyman, D. P. (1977). Optimal Disposal Policies for a Single-item Inventory System with Returns. Naval Research
Logistics, 24(3), 385-405.
Huchzermeier, A., & Cohen, M. A. (1996). Valuing Operational Flexibility Under Exchange Rate Risk. Operations
Research, 44(1), 100-113.
Inderfurth, K. (1997). Simple Optimal Replenishment and Disposal Policies for a Product Recovery System with
Leadtimes. OR Spektrum, 19(2), 111-122.
Jacobs, R. (2000). Playing the Beer Distribution Game Over the Internet. POMS, forthcoming.
Johnson, M. E. (1998a). Give them what they want. Management Review, November, 62-67.
Johnson, M. E. (1998b). The Impact of Sorting Strategies on Automated Sortation System Performance. IIE
Transactions, 30(1), 67-77.
Johnson, M. E., & Anderson, E. (1999). The Value of Postponement in Channel Management. Unpublished Working
Paper, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Johnson, M. E., & Brandeau, M. L. (1999). Design of an Automated Shop Floor Material Handling System.
Operations Research, 47(1), 65-80.
Johnson, M. E., & Davis, T. (1998). Improving supply chain performance using order fulfillment metrics. National
Productivity Review, Summer, 3-16.
Johnson, M. E., & Pyke, D. F. (2000a). A Framework for Teaching Supply Chain Management.
POMS(forthcoming).
Johnson, M. E., & Pyke, D. F. (Eds.). (2000b). Teaching Supply Chain Management: Production and Operations
Management Society.
Johnston, F. R., & Boylan, J. E. (1996). Forecasting for Items with Intermittent Demand. Journal of the Operational
Research Society, 47, 113-121.
Kelle, P., & Silver, E. A. (1989). Purchasing Policy of New Containers Considering the Random Returns of
Previously Issued Containers. IIE Transactions, 21, 349-354.
Kelley, B. (1995). Outsourcing marches on. Journal of Business Strategy, July-Aug, 39-42.
Kopczak, L., Lee, H., & Whang, S. (1995). Note on logistics. Unpublished Note, Stanford University, Stanford, C A.
28
Kouvelis, P. (1999). Global Sourcing Strategies under Exchange Rate Uncertainty. In S. Tayur, M. Magazine, & R.
Ganeshan (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (pp. 625-668). Boston, MA: Kluwer
Academic Publishers.
Lambert, D. M., Stock, J. R., Ellram, L. M., & Stockdale, J. (1997). Fundamentals of logistics management. New
York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Lee, H., & Billington, C. (1992). Managing supply chain inventories: Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management
Review, 65-73.
Lee, H., Billington, C., & Carter, B. (1993). Hewlett-Packard Gains Control of Inventory and Service Through
Design for Localization. Interfaces, 23(4), 1-11.
Lee, H., & Kopczak, L. (1997). Responding to the Asia-Pacific challenge. Supply Chain Management Review,
Spring, 8-9.
Lee, H., Padmanabhan, P., & Whang, S. (1997). The Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains. Sloan Management Review,
38(3), 93-102.
Lee, H., & Whang, S. (1999a). Decentralized Multi-echelon Supply Chains: Incentives and Information.
Management Science, 45(5), 633-640.
Lee, H. L., & Nahmias, S. (1993). Single-Product, Single-Location Models. In S. Graves, A. Rinnooy Kan, & P.
Zipkin (Eds.), Logistics of Production and Inventory (Vol. 4, pp. Chapter 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier (North-
Holland).
Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (1999). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain.
Management Science, forthcoming.
Lee, H. L., & Whang, S. (1999b). Information Sharing in a Supply Chain. International Journal of Technology
Management, forthcoming.
Little, A. D. (1995). An exchange of knowledge among leading practitioners in supply chain management.
Unpublished Note, A.D. Little and Associates, Boston, MA.
Magretta, J. (1998). The power of virtual integration: An interview with Dell Computer's Michael Dell. Havard
Business Review, March-April.
Marien, E. J. (1998). Reverse logistics as competitive strategy. Supply Chain Management Review, Spring, 43-52.
29
McCutcheon, D. M., Raturi, A. S., & Meredith, J. R. (1994). The customization-responsiveness squeeze. Sloan
Management Review, Winter, 89-99.
McMillan, J. (1990). Managing Suppliers: Incentive Systems in Japanese and U.S. Industry. California
Management Review(Summer), 38-55.
Meyer, M. (1997). The performance imperative. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1988). Communication and Inventory as Substitutes in Organizing Production.
Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 90, 275-289.
Moinzadeh, K., & Aggarwal, P. K. (1997). An Information Based Multi-Echelon Inventory System with Emergency
Orders. Operations Research, 45(5), 694-701.
Muckstadt, J. A., & Isaac, M. H. (1981). An Analysis of Single Item Inventory Systems with Returns. Naval
Research Logistics, 28(2), 237-254.
Narus, J. A., & Anderson, J. C. (1996). Rethinking Distribution. Harvard Business Review(July-August), 112-120.
O'Laughlin, K. A. (1997). Five steps to improved performance measurement. Supply Chain Management Review,
Fall, 52-58.
Padmanabhan, V., & Png, I. P. L. (1995). Return policies: Make money by making good. Sloan Management
Review, Fall, 65-72.
Penev, K. D., & de Ron, A. J. (1996). Determination of a Disassembly Strategy. International Journal of Production
Research, 34(2), 495-506.
Pyke, D. F. (1994). Global Sourcing at a Second Glance. Global Competitor, 1(3), 70-74.
Pyke, D. F. (1998, February 20). Strategies for Global Sourcing. Financial Times, pp. 2-4.
Quinn, J. B., & Hilmer, F. (1994). Strategic Outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 43-55.
Richter, K. (1996). The EOQ Repair and Waste Disposal Model with Variable Setup Numbers. European Journal of
Operational Research, 95(2), 313-324.
Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. (1998). Planning for Product Platforms. Sloan Management Review(Summer), 19-31.
Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration. Research Policy, 24,
543-562.
30
Rudi, N., & Pyke, D. F. (1998). Product Recovery at the Norwegian Health Insurance Administration. Interfaces,
forthcoming.
Schonfeld, E. (1998). The customized, digitized, have-it-your-way economy. Fortune, September, 115-124.
Senge, P. (1990). The fifth disciline. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Sharman, G. J. (1997). Supply chain lessons from Europe. Supply Chain Management Review, Fall, 11-13.
Silver, E. A., Pyke, D. F., & Peterson, R. (1998). Inventory Management and Production Planning and Scheduling.
(3 ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., & Simchi-Levi, E. (1998). Designing and managing the supply chain. New York,
NY: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Srinivasan, K., Kekre, S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1994). Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT
Shipments. Management Science, 40(10), 1291-1304.
Sterman, J. D. (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making
experiment. Management Science, 35(3), 321-339.
Sterman, J. D. (1992). Teaching takes off: Flight simulators for management education. OR/MS Today, October,
40-43.
Taleb, K. N., Gupta, S. M., & Brennan, L. (1997). Disassembly of Complex Product Structures with Parts and
Materials Commonality. Production Planning & Control, 8(3), 255-269.
Taylor, D. (1997). Global cases in logistics and supply chain management. New York, NY: International Thomson
Business Press.
Tayur, S., Magazine, M., & Ganeshan, R. (Eds.). (1999). Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management.
Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Thierry, M., Salomon, M., Van Nunen, J., & Van Wassenhove, L. V. (1995). Strategic Issues in Product Recovery
Management. California Management Review, 37(2), 114-135.
Towill, D., & DelVecchio. (1994). The application of filter theory to the study of supply chain dynamics.
Production Planning & Control, 5(1), 82-96.
Train, J. (1998). Legal issues affecting distribution and supply. Unpublished Working Paper, Duke University,
Durham, NC.
31
Tsay, A. A., Hahmias, S., & Agrawal, N. (1999). Modeling Supply Chain Contracts: A Review. In S. Tayur, M.
Magazine, & R. Ganeshan (Eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (pp. 299-336).
Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ulrich, K., & Ellison, D. (1999). Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Management
Science, 45(5), 641-655.
van der Laan, E., Dekker, R., Salomon, M., & Ridder, A. (1996). An (s,Q) Inventory Model with Remanufacturing
and Disposal. International Journal of Production Economics, 46-47, 339-350.
van der Laan, E., Salomon, M., & Dekker, R. (1997). Production Planning and Inventory Control for
Remanufacturable Durable Products. European Journal of Operational Research, 102(2), 264-278.
van der Laan, E., Salomon, M., & Dekker, R. (1999). An investigation of lead-time effects in
manufacturing/remanufacturing systems under simple PUSH and PULL control strategies. European
Journal of Operational Research, 115(1), 195-214.
Venkatesan, R. (1992). Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Business Review, Nov-Dec, 98-107.
Verity, J. W. (1996). Clearing the Cobwebs from the Stockroom. Business Week, October 21, 140.
Waller, M., Johnson, M. E., & Davis, T. (1999). Vendor-Managed Inventory in the Retail Supply Chain. Journal of
Business Logistics, 20(1), 183-203.
Whang, S., Gilland, W., & Lee, H. (1995). Information Flows in Manufacturing under SAP R/3. Unpublished
Working Paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Williams, T. M. (1984). Stock Control With Sporadic and Slow-Moving Demand. Journal of the Operational
Research Society, 35(10), 939-948.
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1991). The Machine that Changed the World: The Story of Lean
Production. New York: Harper Perennial.
Woolley, S. (1997). Replacing inventory with information. Forbes, March 24, 54-48.