superfundsite field investigation report
TRANSCRIPT
GZAGeoEnviionmental, Inc.
Engineers1 andScientists •>
MII I ^
"
3Z\g^8&'«-':•;•• '<tvv I..-v'«'.- - . ' . •
ROSE HILL LANDFILLSUPERFUNDSITEFIELD INVESTIGATION REPORTSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
GZ\
ROSE HILL LANDFILLSUPERFUNDSITEFIELD INVESTIGATION REPORTSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
PREPARED FOR:Town of South KingstownSouth Kingstown, Rhode Island
PREPARED BY:GZA GeoEnvironmental.Inc.Providence, Rhode Island
February 1999File No. 32090
Copyright© 1999 GZA GeoEnvironmentalJnc.
GZAGeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Engineers andScientists
Februarys, 1999File No. 32090
oz\140 BroadwayProvidenceRhode Island 02903401-421-4140FAX 401-751-8613http^/www. gza.net
A Subsidiary of GZAGeoEnvironmentalTechnologies, Inc.
Mr. Jon SchockTown of South KingstownP.O. Box 331South Kingstown, Rhode Island 02880-0031
Mr. JeffCeasrineTown of Narragansett25 Fifth StreetNarragansett, Rhode Island 02882
Re: Rose Hill Landfill Superfund SiteField Investigation ReportSouth Kingstown, Rhode Island
Dear Gentlemen:
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) is pleased to provide this Field Investigation Report, which documents theprocedures employed and findings of our recent studies at the Rose Hill Landfill Superfund Site in SouthKingstown, Rhode Island. The work was completed in accordance with terms and conditions of our May 14,1998 contract and is subject to the limitations contained in Appendix A of the report. Section 5.00 of the report,our Conclusions, is considered an Executive Summary, and should be reviewed in conjunction with the entirereport
We hope this report satisfies your present needs. If you have any comments or need any additional information,please call Ed Summerly at (401) 421 -4140 (Ext. 3133) or via e-mail at [email protected].
Very truly yours,
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL,INC.
J0&flriT.Unsworth,P.E.Assistant Project Manager
Edward A.Senior Project ager
Michael Power^P.E.Semor Principal
JTU/JPH:lag
cc: Cynthia Gianfrancesco.RIDEMDavid Newton, USEPA
O:\JOBS\ENV\32090.EAS\COV-LET.DOC
An Fxjual Opportunity t-mpliivcr M/W/II
GZV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.00 INTRODUCTION 1
1.10 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 11.20 SCOPE OF WORK 1
2.00 BULKY WASTE AREA TEST PITS 2
2.10 TEST PIT EXPLORATIONS 22.20 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 32.30 AIR MONITORING RESULTS 3
3.00 BULKY WASTE AREA IRON CONTRIBUTION 4
3.10 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION 43.20 WELLHEAD SURVEY AND PIEZOMETRIC LEVELS 43.30 GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE SAMPLING 53.40 ANALYTICAL TESTING 6
3.41 Groundwater Screening Results 63.42 Groundwater and Leachate Analytical Results 6
4.00 SOLID WASTE AREA LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING 7
4.10 SOIL GAS PROBE INSTALLATION 74.20 FIELD TESTING 74.30 ANALYTICAL TESTING 74.40 RESULTS OF FIELD TESTING 84.50 RESULTS OF VOC ANALYSIS 8
5.00 CONCLUSIONS 9
6.00 LIMITATIONS 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GZ\
TABLES
TABLE 1TABLE 2TABLESTABLE 4
GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE FIELD SCREENING RESULTSGROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE ANALYTICAL RESULTSLANDFILL GAS FIELD TESTING RESULTSLANDFILL GAS ANALYTICAL RESULTS
FIGURES
FIGURE 1 LOCUS PLANFIGURE 2 EXPLORATION LOCATION PLAN
APPENDICES
APPENDIX AAPPENDIX BAPPENDIX CAPPENDDC DAPPENDDC E
APPENDDC F
LIMITATIONSTEST PIT LOGSSITE PHOTOGRAPHSBORING LOGSLABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS -GROUNDWATER AND LEACHATELABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS - SOIL GAS
GZ\
1.00 INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of Field Investigations conducted by GZAGeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) for the Towns of South Kingstown and Narragansett at theformer Rose Hill Landfill in South Kingstown, Rhode Island. The investigation wasconducted in general accordance with a Work Plan approved by the Rhode IslandDepartment of Environmental Management (RIDEM) dated September 18, 1998 and issubject to the Limitations presented in Section 6 and Appendix A.
1.10 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The principle objective of the Field Investigation program was to supplement datagenerated as part of the investigations conducted for the Site and documented in the reporttitled "Remedial Investigation Final Report, Rose Hill Superfand Site, South Kingstown,Rhode Island" produced by Metcalf & Eddy (M&E) for the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency (USEPA) in May 1994.
Specific objectives of the investigation where to:
• evaluate the nature of materials disposed in the Bulky Waste Area,
• evaluate the contribution of the Bulky Waste Area to elevated iron levels previouslyobserved hi leachate seeps,
• evaluate current methane, carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S),and volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations in the Solid Waste Area landfillgas, and
• prepare this Field Investigation Report.
1.20 SCOPE OF WORK
Based on the previous environmental data, our general understandings of site conditions,and conversations with RIDEM, GZA completed the following Scope of Work.
Task 1 - Bulky Waste Area Test Pits - GZA conducted test pit exploration in theBulky Waste landfill to evaluate the nature of the material disposed in that area.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 1
oz\
Task 2 - Bulky Waste Area Iron Contribution - GZA conducted a soil boring, wellinstallation and leachate sampling program to assess the contribution of the BulkyWaste Area to high levels of iron previously detected in leachate seeps downgradient ofthe area. This task consisted of the installation of monitoring wells, groundwatersampling, sampling leachate seeps, laboratory analysis of the aqueous samples, andconducting a groundwater elevation survey of the new and select existing monitoringwells.
Task 3 - Solid Waste Area Landfill Gas Sampling - To evaluate any trends inlandfill gas emissions from the Solid Waste Area that may impact the feasibility ofUSEPA's proposed remedial alternatives. As part of this program, landfill gas sampleswere obtained and field and/or laboratory tested.
2.00 BULKY WASTE AREA TEST PITS
The purpose of the test pit program in the Bulky Waste area was to evaluate thecomposition of the buried material. This information will be used to further assess thefeasibility of mining the Bulky Waste Area which was identified as a potential remedialalternative in the RI. The selection of landfill mining as a potential remedial alternativeassumed that the buried material contained significant amounts of "bulky materials" (i.e.,white goods, metal objects, etc.). The RI contained no exploration data concerning thenature of the materials buried in the Bulky Waste Area.
The field program involved the excavation of test pits in the Bulky Waste Area. Logs of thesubsurface explorations are attached in Appendix B, and approximate test pit locations areindicated on Figure 2, Exploration Location Plan.
2.10 TEST PIT EXPLORATIONS
Test pit locations were selected to provide areal coverage of the Bulky Waste Area. Theprogram involved the completion often test pits (identified as TP-1 through TP-10). CynEnvironmental of Stoughton, Massachusetts completed all of the test pits, and a GZA fieldtechnician was present during the field program to prepare test pit logs describingsubsurface conditions and monitor the excavation and surrounding area for methane as apercentage of the Lower Explosive Limit (%LEL), carbon monoxide (CO), and VOCs.The test pits were excavated utilizing a Hyundai 320LC-3 excavator. The test pits wereadvanced to depths of ranging from 13 to 25 feet below grade.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 2
oz\
2.20 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
The following description of subsurface conditions is based on the explorations completed atthe Site by GZA. The descriptions are somewhat generalized; for more detailed informationrefer to the test pit logs in Appendix B. Photographs of representative the test pits areincluded in Appendix C.
In general, subsurface explorations encountered 3 inches to 1 foot of topsoil underlain by 1.5to 4.5 feet of fine to coarse silty sand. Beneath the sand was apparent municipal solid wasteapproximately 5 to more than 23 feet in thickness. Based on an average waste thickness of15.6 feet and a reported area of 7.4 acres, GZA estimates the waste volume to beapproximately 190,000 cubic yards, versus the 114,000 cubic yards estimated by M&E(M&E 1998). We also estimate the cover soil volume to be on the order of 37,000 cubicyards based on an average observed thickness of 3.1 feet. The municipal waste observedconsisted primarily of plastic, paper, glass, wood, cloth, metal, tires, etc.
No evidence of significant disposal of "white goods" or "bulky waste" was observed in theeight test pits which penetrated the wastes and we observed no evidence of the disposal ofindustrial waste (i.e., drums or sludges). At locations where the excavator was able to digbelow the waste, the waste was underlain by gray to black silty sands. The color of the sandsbelow the waste is assumed to be the result of the anaerobic conditions expected belowburied waste. Groundwater was encountered in four of the test pits at depths ranging from11 to 25 feet below ground surface. In test pit TP-8, the waste extended approximately onefoot below the water table. In TP-1 water was encountered at a depth of 11 feet, 9 feet abovethe base of the waste. Based on our observations, we believe the TP-1 observationsrepresents a perched water table condition which is common in landfills. Buried waste in theother test pits in which groundwater was encountered was not present below the water table.Our findings do not support the assumption that this area was filled with "bulky waste".
2.30 AIR MONITORING RESULTS
During the excavation of the test pits, ambient air in the vicinity of the excavations wasmonitored for health and safety reasons. A Thermal Environmental Instruments Model 5 SOBphotoionization detector was used to monitor for VOCs and a Gastech GT 300 LandSurveyor was used to monitor %LEL, O2, and H2S. No VOCs were detected abovebackground concentrations. No measurable levels of H2S were detected. The LEL levelsdetected were zero except for brief (< 10 seconds) periods during which LEL levels rose to ahigh of 1 %. Oxygen levels ranged from 20.8% to 20.9%.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 3
oz\
3.00 BULKY WASTE AREA IRON CONTRIBUTION
The purpose of this program was to determine the contribution of the Bulky Waste Area tohigh levels of iron reportedly detected in leachate seeps downgradient of the area. Thefield program involved the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells upgradient ofthe Bulky Waste Area, a groundwater elevation survey, sampling the new monitoring wellsand previously sampled leachate seeps, and analytical testing of the samples. Boring logs ofthe groundwater monitoring wells are attached in Appendix D, and the approximatelocations of the wells and leachate seeps are indicated on Figure 2, Exploration LocationPlan.
An initial attempt was made to install the monitoring wells with a Geo-Probe rig. However,the Geo-Probe was unable to penetrate the subsurface due to cobbles and boulders. Astandard drill rig using hollow stem augers was then used to install the three monitoringwells.
3.10 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION
Groundwater monitoring locations were selected to evaluate groundwater conditionsupgradient of the Bulky Waste Area. The program involved the installation of threegroundwater monitoring wells (identified as monitoring wells GZ-2 through GZ-4). Aboring, designated GZ-1 in the Work Plan, was to be performed near the eastern end of theSite owner's driveway. However, due to the difficult drilling conditions, this location waseliminated. Guild Drilling Co. of East Providence, Rhode Island, completed all of theexplorations, and a GZA field technician was present during the field program to direct andobserve activities and prepare boring logs describing subsurface conditions. The boringswhere advanced to depths of ranging from 22 to 27 feet below grade.
A 2-inch ID PVC groundwater monitoring well with a 10-foot well screen (0.01-inch slotsize) set to span the observed water table was installed in each of the three borings. PVCconnections were threaded and no solvents or cements were used to secure the pipe fittings.Wellheads were completed with an approximately five-foot long stand pipe set 2 feet belowgrade and cemented in place. The wells are secured with a vented, lockable cap.
3.20 WELLHEAD SURVEY AND PIEZOMETRIC LEVELS
GZA conducted a wellhead elevation survey on October 28, 1998. An existing monitoringwell (MW-V) of known elevation was used as a benchmark. A Solinist water level meterwith an accuracy of + 0.01 feet was used to determine the depths to groundwater.Groundwater was typically encountered at depths of approximately 18 to 29 feet belowgrade in the newly installed upgradient wells and MW-V, and 2 to 3 feet below grade inexisting downgradient wells designated MW03-2 and MW12-1. The following tablecontains the survey and groundwater measurement results. This data was used to generatethe groundwater contours shown on Figure 2.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 4
ozvGZ-2GZ-3GZ-4MW-VMW03-2MW12-1
head'Elevation
62.3763.9768.9467.2439.3641.82
18.5820.7525.2029.002.342.70
43.7943.2243,7443.8437.0239.12
3.30 GROUND WATER AND LEACHATE SAMPLING
On October 28, 1998, GZA personnel collected groundwater samples from the three newmonitoring wells. The sampling was performed in accordance with the US EPA's July 30,1996 Low Stress (low flow) Purging and Sampling Procedure. As part of that samplingmethodology, well stabilization was evaluated through the measurement of specific waterquality parameters recorded during the purging process. The final stabilized water qualityparameter measurements are provided in Table 1.
During groundwater sampling, a variable speed peristaltic pump was utilized to control therate of purging and limit the drawdown caused by this operation. Dedicated 3/8-inch O.D.polyethylene tubing installed in each of the existing wells was utilized as the intake anddischarge tubing for the pumps. Pharmaceutical grade tubing was utilized as the pumphead tubing and connected to the intake and discharge tubing by clamps sufficient toprevent the introduction of air into the sample. Iron samples were collected directly fromthe discharge tubing. The VOC samples were collected by means of the VOC receptacle(described below) which has been approved by the RIDEM and USEPA for use at othergroundwater monitoring sites.
The VOC receptacle consists of a 1-inch OD by 3-foot long stainless steel tube with aTeflon ball-check valve installed at the bottom. The top of the tube is fitted with astainless steel and Teflon compression fitting which allows for direct attachment to thededicated tubing. During low flow purging and sampling, the receptacle acts as anextension to the tubing. For VOC sample collection, the VOC receptacle is retrieved fromthe well, and the VOC sample is obtained directly from the receptacle using a Teflonbottom discharge valve (similar to a disposable bailer). This method allows much morecost effective low flow sampling for VOC and other pressure sensitive parameters, limitsthe potential for cross contamination (compared with non-dedicated submersible pumpssuch as the Redi Flo-2) and maintains the integrity of the sample.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 5
GZV
Following purging, groundwater samples were collected from each well and placed inpreserved bottles provided by the project analytical laboratory. Leachate seep samples werealso collected from three locations. An orange material was observed on the surface of theseeps. The samples were collected directly from the seeps into preserved bottles provided bythe project analytical laboratory. All samples were placed in chilled coolers and transportedunder chain of custody to the laboratory.
3.40 ANALYTICAL TESTING
Laboratory testing services were provided by Mitkem Corporation which is a RIDOHlicensed testing facility. Laboratory Certificates of Analysis are presented in Appendix E,and results are summarized in Table 2. Testing results are discussed below.
3.41 Groundwater Screening Results
To evaluate the efficacy of the low flow purging and sampling program, GZArecorded levels of temperature, pH, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen (DO) andturbidity of the groundwater from the three monitoring wells sampled. Final stabilizedreadings are reported on Table 1. Temperature reading ranged from 12.6°C to 12.7°C.Levels of pH ranged from 4.8 standard units (SU) to 5.7 SU. These pH values are consideredtypical to somewhat low for groundwater in the New England area. Specific conductancevalues ranged from a low of 72 jiS/cm2 at GZ-3 to 570 nS/cm2 at GZ-4 and are typical tosomewhat high for unimpacted groundwater hi this area. Dissolved oxygen levels rangedfrom 0.04 mg/1 (GZ-3) to 0.42 mg/1 (GZ-4) and are low for groundwater in the area. Aturbidity level of 10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) was measured at all three wells.Turbidity is a quick estimator of suspended solid content and is typically below 100 NTUwhen low flow methods are employed.
3.42 Groundwater and Leachate Analytical Results
GZA collected and analyzed groundwater and leachate samples from the three groundwater monitoring wells installed at the Site and three leachate seeps downgradient of the area.The groundwater and leachate seep samples were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260and total iron by EPA Method 6010. The leachate seep samples were also analyzed for ironbacteria by Standard Method SM9240B.
One individual VOC, MTBE which is constituent of unleaded gasoline, was detected inthe sample from GZ-2 at a concentration of 34 ug/1. No VOCs were detected in the tripblank. Iron was reported in the monitoring wells at concentrations ranging from non-detectable (ND) (<0.3 mg/1) to 0.9 mg/1. Iron was detected in the leachate seeps atconcentrations ranging from 33 to 250 mg/1. No iron bacteria was detected in any of theleachate seeps.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 6
ozv
Based on the results of the analysis, the Bulky Waste Area appears to be contributingto the elevated levels of iron in the leachate seeps. The average concentration in thegroundwater from the three monitoring wells, assuming one half the detection limit for thenon-detected result, was 0.58 mg/1. The average iron concentration in the leachate seeps was124 mg/1,200 times the groundwater concentration. Additionally, since no iron bacteria wasdetected, the orange material observed on the leachate seeps is most likely iron from theseeps precipitating out of solution due to the change from an oxygen deficient to oxygen richatmosphere.
4.00 SOLID WASTE AREA LANDFILL GAS SAMPLING
The landfill gas data in the RI is at least six years old; thus, GZA's goal was to evaluate ifthis old information is characteristic of current landfill gas constituents. This field programinvolved the installation of six temporary soil gas probes and field and laboratory testing ofsoil gas samples. The locations of the soil gas probes are indicated on Figure 2.
4.10 SOIL GAS PROBE INSTALLATION
Three soil gas probes were installed at the approximate locations where Summa canistersamples were obtained by M&E during the RI. The other three probes were installed atlocations west of these points to evaluate the extent of the landfill gas plume migrating offsite towards residents located west of the Site along Rose Hill Road. The five-foot longstainless-steel probes were manually driven with a slide hammer. The probes were extractedapproximately one foot prior to purging and sampling. Where water was encountered, theprobes were extracted at six inch intervals until water was not drawn into the probe.
4.20 FIELD TESTING
Following their installation, the probes were purged at a rate approximately 2 liters/minutewith portable air pumps for approximately 15-30 minutes. After purging, the soil gas wasfield tested for VOCs, H2S, CO2, O2, and methane. A Thermal Environmental InstrumentsModel 580B photoionization detector utilizing a 10.6 eV lamp was used to measureconcentrations of VOCs, a GasTech Model GT 300 Land Surveyor was used to measureH2S, and a Landtec Model GA-90 was employed to measure methane, O2, and CO2.
4.30 ANALYTICAL TESTING
At three locations, a sample of the landfill gas was obtained for laboratory VOC analysis.The samples were collected from the approximate locations of the three landfill gassamples collected for laboratory analysis by M&E during the RI. As during the RI,SUMMA canisters were used to collect the samples for laboratory analysis. The sampleswere submitted to Air Toxics Ltd. of Folsom, California and analyzed for sixty VOCs byEPA Method TO-14.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 7
oz\
4.40 RESULTS OF FIELD TESTING
Table 3 summarizes the results of the field screening program. As indicated on the table,methane levels ranged from 0 % at location GZSG-3 to 68.7% at location GZSG(11+500).VOCs and H2S were detected only at location GZSG(11+500) at concentrations of 260and 16 ppm, respectively. CO2 concentrations ranged from 0.7% at location GZSG-3 to38.3% at location GZSG(11+500). O2 was not detected at locations GZSG(13+300C) andGZSG-1. The highest O2 concentration measured was 19.8% at location GZSG-3.
The field testing indicates that methane generation rates vary significantly across the SolidWaste Area. As shown on Table 3, the methane levels detected generally appear consistentwith those measured by M&E during the RI. The only significant difference in the fieldscreening data was at the sampling point GZSG-3. Methane and CO2 concentrations werehigher during the RI as compared to levels detected during GZA's field investigation.Correspondingly, O2 concentrations were lower in the RI than in this investigation. Basedon the observed decrease in methane and CO2 concentrations and the increase in O2, webelieve that landfill gas generation in this area has decreased since the RI data wasgenerated.
4.50 RESULTS OF VOC ANALYSIS
The results of the landfill gas VOC analysis are summarized in Table 4. LaboratoryCertificates of Analysis are contained hi Appendix F. Several VOCs were detected in allthe samples obtained. Sample GZSG(3+300) contained the largest number of VOCs (22compounds) and sample GZSG(11+500) contained the fewest number of VOCs (6compounds). However, sample GZSG(11+500) contained the highest concentrations ofVOCs (2,526 parts per million by volume-ppmv). Table 4 also includes the results of thelandfill gas laboratory analysis of Summa canister samples obtained during the RI byM&E.
The suite of VOCs and concentrations detected by GZA hi the landfill gas are generallyconsistent with the data generated during the RI. Differences at locationsGZSG(13+300C) and SW(13+300) are likely due to the fact that GZSG(13+300C) wasmoved approximately 100 feet west of the location of SW(13+300) due to shallow perchedwater at the original location. A localized hot spot of VOCs appears to be present in thenorthern portion of the Solid Waste Area.
Based on the data from the RI and data generated during this field investigation, it appearsthat VOCs emissions from the Solid Waste Area have not changed significantly since theRI. Similar sampling and testing programs were employed during this investigation andthe RI. Therefore, it is appropriate to compare the data from the studies. The methanetesting results indicate that methane generation rates are decreasing in the south. Thistrend is consistent with historical information which indicates the landfill was filled fromsouth to north.
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 8
oz\
5.00 CONCLUSIONS
A Field Investigation has been conducted at the Rose Hill Landfill in South Kingstown,Rhode Island. The investigation included a subsurface exploration of the Bulky WasteArea, sampling and analysis of groundwater and leachate seeps in the vicinity of the BulkyWaste Area, and landfill gas sampling and testing in the Solid Waste Area. Based on ourevaluation of the project data, GZA has developed the following key conclusions.
• Materials buried in the Bulky Waste Area consist primarily of municipal solid wasteand are deeper and more voluminous than estimated in the M&E's FS report.
• The Bulky Waste Area is contributing to elevated levels of iron in downgradientleachate seeps and may continue to do so after capping due to the presence ofsubmerged waste.
• Landfill gas characteristics from the Solid Waste Area have not changed significantlysince the completion of the RI. A localized hot spot of VOC vapors appears to bepresent in the northern portion of the landfill area. Methane generation rates havedecreased in the southern portion of the area most likely due to the age of the waste.
6.00 LIMITATIONS
GZA's field investigation was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices ofother consultants undertaking similar studies at the same time and in the same geographicalarea, and GZA observed the degree of care and skill generally exercised by other consultantsunder similar circumstances and conditions. GZA's findings and conclusions must beconsidered not as scientific certainties, but rather as our professional opinion concerning thesignificance of the limited data gathered during the course of the filed investigation. No otherwarranty, express or implied, is made.
G:UOBS\ENV\32090.EAS\REPORT.DOC
February 8, 1999 - File No. 32090 - Page 9
oz\
TABLES
GOH
00
O
ao00
Q•JW
»-wJ
3IX,
12SO<w
ngs
Sout
h
1
00
OO ON
ON 3;<=?o
« §*— • O
= 25
S g2 S?**• f* »—» o
t tyur
b
I*llO M
cx oC M
H 5
<£
£ «I s?
aoo\oC4
1
JDO
o\0\ON
KO
1
I
1
oo
T 00
1— 1
00
3|
•»st/i> 15
00
0 |
oof> ^
°s
..ol
v/.>3=
no
1 3J QO 4>Q. fi.
E E
Q
Q
Q
DZ
Q
ro
1
•Sc0
U«
C 3« CO
&t4t i
' Jl
> s
00OO
a
IO
o
p
o
I
0u,
g
QZ
Qz
Qz
z
HZ
«
n•:^jOS
CQc£
o
g
£aMlEg1Cl
&I
HIV O Oo. Z Z
-)H° -— -« ^^Z <-c c« n
2
o<N
.0o
OsONOs
(3+3
C
»o 5S<C + 5^S a "*
*glO
o o
SW(1
1+5
G
f-l**'g SiO 095 P42 —"5. "5E ECO 01
CO <fi
<=>S t~t tt
o H• -jr
*~
<N
°. <=> oo
o o ac
GZ
SG-3
12/1
4/98
en
•> *? siM
Sam
'ple
Loc
ale
Dat
e
t-~ 0 00 2 0 0
o „
- o o
-{ O O O* o o o
o ^ ,<_> O ffi >
Vs
V)
"x
JJ€_0oo«
•o -a•S fiS o- aV Va a
I 1ON•*Os
00 S
1 ?
| I
6s IEsf^ w *$ CD •$
!§i^ w -^
I
•5 Sg
3°O «•
u
o
'a
g g g g g g g g g g i g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g
i g g g g g g g g g g i g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g
o o o ,-, o P o P p
o o o c* o *"1 oo o o r o o
^ o ***- **: o °. p o o o o p o , p .00 , o p o p o p p p5 2 o £ o £ o o o o o o o ' o 'do ' d d d c? d d d d
igg|g|gllillgigggggggggggggggggggg
o o o p
3 o o£ 0 0
. . o o o oo' odd
. , idddddo'o'ddg *o" § d 'do"
o o °. o o o o
g
•f•g•g
lls S E E S -So e g - 2 ^ - S i ^ S f g
fi5llIIiiil!iiSii!iIle - s s - -i £ i £ i £ > 0 — • — " 6 A — ' — — — • < Q < N a i S u 4 i 3 E — ' m 4
II
m
FIGURES
§
i
FROM USGS NARRAGANSETT PIER, Rl QUADRANGLE MAP(DIGITAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS PROVIDED BV EARTHVBIONS INC)
APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET
0' 1200' 2400' 4800
GZV ROSE HILL LANDFILL
SOUTH KINGSTOWN RHODE ISLAND
LOCUS PLAN
JANUARY 1999 FIGURE NO 1
NVId NOIJ.V001NOIiVa01dX3,009 .OOC
6661 "83J :31Vd,009=Ml =
MV9 :
SV3 :X8 Q3AGIA38-XQ Q3>103HO
SV3 -y3KN TOdd QNVISI 3QOHy 'NOiSONI* HinOS133d Nl 31VOS OIHdVdO
NOIidiyQS3Q
1o
CV
APPENDIX A
LIMITATIONS
LIMITATIONS
1. The observations described in this report were made under the conditions stated therein.The conclusions presented in the report were based solely upon the services describedtherein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of described services orthe time and budgetary constraints imposed by Client.
2. In preparing this report, GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. (GZA) has relied on certaininformation provided by state and local officials and other parties referenced therein.Although there may have been some degree of overlap in the information provided by thesevarious sources, GZA did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completenessof all information reviewed or received during the course of this field investigation.
3. In the event that Client obtains information on environmental or hazardous waste issues atthe site not contained in this report, such information shall be brought to GZA's attentionforthwith. GZA will evaluate such information and, on the basis of this evaluation, maymodify the conclusions stated in this report.
4. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part upon thedata obtained from a limited number of soil and/or groundwater samples obtained fromwidely spaced subsurface explorations. The nature and extent of variations between theseexplorations may not become evident until further exploration. If variations or other latentconditions then appear evident, it will be necessary to reevaluate the conclusions andrecommendations of this report.
5. Water level readings have been made in the test pits, borings, and/or observation wells atthe times and under the conditions stated on the test pit or boring logs. However, it must benoted that fluctuations in the level of groundwater may occur due to variations in rainfalland other factors different from those prevailing at the time measurements were made.
6. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based in part uponvarious types of chemical data and are contingent upon their validity. These data have beenreviewed and interpretations made in the report. It should be noted that variations in thetypes and concentrations of contaminants and variations in their flow paths may occur dueto seasonal water table fluctuations, past disposal practices, the passage of time, and otherfactors. Should additional chemical data become available in the future, these data shouldbe reviewed by GZA and the conclusions and recommendations presented herein modifiedaccordingly.
LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 1
7. Chemical analyses have been performed for specific parameters during the course of thissite assessment, as described in the text. However, it should be noted that additionalchemical constituents not searched for during the current study may be present in soil gasand/or groundwater and leachate at the site.
LIMITENV.SA (1/1/91) PAGE 2
oz\ Cd
APPENDIX B
TEST PIT LOGS
1L»ZAereOENVlRONMENTAL,INC,;MOBROAOWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
fECHNICAL/GEOHYDHCXOGICALOOStSULTANTS
GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR:OPERATOR:
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE:CAPACITY:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
T~~ *
-e-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
TEST PIT FIELD LOGPROJECT
DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
ItSIWINO.: TP-1
RLE NO.: 32090.5
DATE: tO/8/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 09-301.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
SOIL DESCRIPTION
5" BrownTopsoil
Cover Sal
light brown, fine to coarse SAND, little Silt
gray, line to coarse SAND, some + Silt Cover Soil
Municipal Waste
PLASTIC and PAPER products, some -Glass, some -Metal,
trace -fine to coarse Sand
2 tires
5L
1 mattress
REMARKS:
W
10
ST PIT PLAN20
*-NORTH
'.UME- 1*4cu. yd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6M8-
18--36"se- OR LARGER
COUNI
isrre.fiDESIGNATION
A8C
(cans and pipes) little Wood.
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
1A
2A
1C
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACE (TR) 0-10%LITTLE (LI) 10-20%SOME (SO) 20-36%AND 35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
v-1 — OBSERVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGIZA QtOcNVIHONMENTAL, INC.** BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
fECHNICAUGEOHYDnOLOGICALCONSULTANTS
PROJECT
DESCHIPTKDN: ROSE HILt tANOFILL
LOCATION: 8OUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NOJ
RLE NO.:
DATS;
TP-1
32090.5
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd.
MODEL;REACH:
320 lc-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
9:1511:00
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
CITY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-22-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
20' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, some - Silt
24.5' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
REMARKS:
TEST PIT PLAN20
10
NORTHUME- 144cu. yd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6M-18-
COUNT
DESIGNATION
AB
as* OR LARGER
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACE (TR)LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)AND
0-10%10-20%
2036%35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
£ EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
- OBSERVED GflOUNDWATER LEVEL
S TEST PIT FIELD LOGlicQENVIRONMENTAL* INC, PROJECTWOADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
v., CCHNICAL/QEOHYDnOLOGICALQONSUtfANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NO,: TP-2
FILE NO- 32000.6
OAT€: 10ffl9B
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTQZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR. CYN
A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 13:30
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
•— -8-
-e-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6' Brown Topsoil
Cover Soil
1.5' brown, fine to coarse SAND, line 1o coarse Gravel, tttte Silt
Cover Soil
2.5' gray, <me SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt
Municipal Waste
PAPER PRODUCTS, some Wood (2 box springs, laths), little Ash, little Glass
little Cloth, little Metals (i.e. wire, rods, pipe)
2 tires
fine to coarse SAND, ditto* brush
Municipal Waste
Cover Soil
PAPER PRODUCTS, some Wood (laths), little Ash, little Glass, little Metal
(i.e. pipe, rods, wire)
REMARKS
T£
10
ST PIT PLAN
20
-»NORTH
UME« 1400U. vd.
LEGEND:
BOULDER COUNT
SIZE RANGE " t£TTER
CLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION
6M8' A
le'-se* B36* OR LARGER C
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
2A
IB
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACE CTfi) 0-10%LITTLE (U) 1O2OT4SOME (SO) 2<K35%
AND 3540%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM yOOERATt
D DIFFICULT
VOBSERVED OROUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGV GtOENVlHONMtNTAL, INC.
I* '^ROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
f£CHNICAUQ6OHYOnOtOOICALCONSULTANTS
DESCHIPINON:
LOCATION: ,
ROSE HILL LANDFILL
SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND
cST PIT NO-
FILE NO-'
DATE:
TP-2
32090.5
10/7/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR- A FLORI
WEATHER: SUNNY 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd.
MODEL:REACH:
320 lc-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
10.55
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-2S-
18' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little Sill
22' BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
REMARKS.
1 No water was encountered during excavation.
TEST PIT PLAN20
to
NOHTH
'.UME- 140cu. yd.
LEGEND:
BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6--18-18-.36"
36" OR LARGER
<#owr
tETTEflDESIGNATION
AB
PROPORTIONSUSH)
LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)
AND
0-10%
10-20%20-35%
35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
OBSERVED OROUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOG
«0 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
,reCHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCONSULTANTS
GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR:A. FLORI OPERATOR:
WEATHER SUNNY 60° MAKE:CAPACITY:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
LOCATION; SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND
TCSTPitNO^ TP3 •
FILE NO.; 32090*
DATE: 10/7/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED: 2:501.5 cu. yd. REACH. 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED.
SOIL DESCRIPTION
3"
1 .5' brown, fine to coarse SAND,
3' gray, fine SAND, line Gravel,
Topsoil
Cover Soil
line to coarse Gravel, Mtle Silt
Cover Soil
some Silt
Municipal Waste
CLOTH, little Plastic, little Cans, little Bottles, little Metal (i.e
2 Tires, little Wood
REMARKS
TE
10
ST PIT PLAN
20
-»
NORTH"tUME- 170cu.yd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6--18-18--36-
86' OR LARGER
COUNT
LETTERDESIGNATION
Ae0
bars, pipes),
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
3A
1B
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACE (TR) 0-10%
LITTLE (U) ItWOW
SOME (SO) 2045%AND 35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
vOBSERVED GfiOUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZAGEOENVIRONMENTAL. INC. PROJECTl«0 BftOAOWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
DESCRIPTtON: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
JTECHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCCWSOLTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NO4 TP-3
FILE NO.: 32090.5
DATE: . I0ff«o
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN
A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 60° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 2:50
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
DEPTH
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
Y -22-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
1 8' gray, black, fine to coarse SAND, line to coarse Gravel, little Silt
22' gray, black, line - SAND, and Silt
25' BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
1A
REMARK
NO.
1
REMARKS:
1 . No water was encountered during excavation.
T£
10
ST PIT PLAN
20
NORTH
*XJJME» 170 cu. Vd.
LEGEND:BOULDER COUNT PROPORTIONS
USED
SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION TRACE (TR) 0-10%
6M6' A LITTLE flj) 10-20%18--36" B SOME (SO) 2O-3S%
36" OR LARGER C AND 95-60%
EM
D
V::;,:. O
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
EASY
MODERATEDIFFICULT
BSERVED GROUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZAGEOENVIRONMENTALt INC. •-" PROJECT' "> BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, W
DESCRIPTION: HOSE HILL LANDFILL
CONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
T£ST PIT NO.; TP-4
FILE NO.: «8»O.S
DATE: 1WM98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN
A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 50° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 10:55
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
-8-
-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6" Brown Topsoil
Cover Soil
light brown, line to coarse SAND, little line to coarse Gravel, trace Silt
Cover Soil
3.4' light gray, fine to coarse SAND, some Sill
Municipal Waste
PAPER PRODUCTS, little Glass, little Cloth, little Metal (cans), trace Wood
trace Brush J
1 tire
2 tires
REMARKS:
TE
10
ST PIT PLAN
SO
NORTH
LEGEND:
BOULDER COUNT
SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION
6M8' *18'-36- 8
36' OR LARGER C >,
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
1B
5A
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONSUSED
THACEfm) 0-10%
LITTLE (LI) \Q3Q%SOME (SO) 20-35%
AND 35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASY
M MODERATED OIPFICOLT
V"=T OBSERVED eflOUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGVIHONMtNTAL, (NC,
.ECHNICAL/GEOHYDROLOGICALODXSUtTANTS
PROJECT
DESCRIPfK*!: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
LOCATION: SOUTH KINSSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NO.:
FILE NO.!
DATE:
TP-4
32090.5
fO/7/W
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/
A. FLORIWEATHER: SUNNY 60"
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5
MODEL: 320 lc-3cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
10:55
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
— -22-
-23-
-2*-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
1 lire
2V gray, black fine to coarse SAND, little Silt
BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
REMARKS:
TESTPrfPLAN20
NORTHUME» 170cu. vd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6M8-
DESIGNATIONA
36" OR LARGER
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACEfm>LITTLE (LI)SOME (SO)AND
0-10%10-20%20-36%
35-60%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
OBSERVED GHOUNDWATEH LEVH
TEST PIT FIELD LOGkjZAGEOGNVIRONMENTAL, INC. - ' ' PROJECT'• "»eBOAOwAY. PROVIDENCE RI
DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILt LANDFILL
. TECHNICAUGEOHYDROLOGICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST P4T NOJ TP-4
FILE NO.: S2090S
DATE; JOff/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR D. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN
A FLOP 1 OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: SUNNY 45° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED: 8:15
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED: 8:50
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
- -8-
-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6' Topsoil
Cover Soil
1 .5' brown, fine to coarse SAND, fine to coarse Gravel, MUe Silt
Cover Soil
3' gray, fine SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt
Municipal Waste
PAPER, litle Plastic, Wile Can, little Bottles, little Wood, Mile Metal (i.e. bars, wires,
cable, bumper), 2 Tires
6' black, gray, fine to coarse SAND, little, fine to coarse Gravel, tittle Silt, little Roots
1 3' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
3A
1B
1C
REMARK
NO.
REMARKS
T£
40
ST PIT PLAN20
-+NORTH
XUME~ 96cu. yd.
LEGEND:BOULOEB eouwr PROPORTIONS
USED
SIZE RANGE LETTERCLASSIFICATION Ceefcr STK*! THACetrfi) 0-10*
6M8- A LJTTLEIU) 10-20%
1S-.36" 6 SOME (SO) 20-36%36' OR LARGER C , AND 3S-60%
EMD
V: O
EXCAVATION
CFFOHTEASY
MODERATEDIFFICULT
3SEHVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL
U TEST PIT FIELD LOGQEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT
BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE. RlDESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDFILL
j JIECHNICAUGeOHYDnOtOOICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND;: ! :
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR. 0. CAPACCHIONE/ CONTRACTOR: CYN
A. FLORI OPERATOR: TY GINGRICHWEATHER: SUNNY 50° MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT.
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
r -e-
-8-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
1' brown Topsoil
Cover Soil
gray, tine SAND, fine Gravel, some Silt
2.5'
Municipal waste
PAPER, little Plastic, little Cans, little Bottles, little Wood, little Cloths, 8 Tires
little Metal (i e. bars, fence),
little Brush
(1) white goods (dryer)
V
T6ST PIT NO^ TP-6
FILENO4 S2000.S
DATE; 10/WW
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED: 9:20TIME COMPLETED: 10:15
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
€
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
4A
3A
REMARK
NO.
1
REMARKS-
1 . Water infiltrating small area in NW & NE corners at 11.5'.
fe
10
ST PIT PLAN20
-4
NORTH•OLUME- IBOcu.vd.
LEGEND:BOULDER COUNT PROPORTIONS
USED
SIZE RANGE terreRCLASSIFICATION DESIGNATION TRACE (TH) 0-10%
6M8' A LITTLE (LI) 10-80%IS'-aC" 6 SOME (SO) 20*95%
36' OR LARGER C AND 35-50%
£M
D
V',: Ol
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
EASYMODERATED»FFlCUCr
3SERVED GR0UNDWATEH LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGaZAQEOENVlBONMENTAL, INC.'"> «tOM)WAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
fECHNICAUQEOHYOnOLOQICALCONSULTANTS
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION; ROSE HILL LANDFILL
LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT
FILENOi
DATE:
82090S
1CW/B6
GZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE/A. FLORI
WEATHER: SUNNY 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT
MODEL:cu. yd. REACH:
320 lc-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
9:2010:15
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-22-
-23-
-2*-
-25-
-26-
-26-
25' BOTTOM OF EXCAVATION
REMARKS:
TEST PIT PLAN
20
NORTH
UME- 180 cu. yd.
LEGEND: -BOULDER
StZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6M6-
36' OR LARGER
COUNT
LETTERDESIGNATION
A8C
PROPORTJONS
USED
TflACEfTR)
LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)
AND
0-10%10-20%
20-35%
35-60%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
£ EASY
M MODERATEO DIFFICULT
OBSERVED 6ROUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZA GEOENVIHONMENTAL, (NC.1 ' -» BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE ftl
CONSULTANTS
PHGUECT
DESCRIPTION; ROSE HILL LANDFILL
LOCATION: SCWW KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT M0.1
FILE NO.:
DATfi;
320904
1OB/W
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTG2A INSPECTOR. D. CAPACCHIONE
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5
MODEL:cu. yd. REACH:
320IC-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
11:00
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-1-
-2-
-5-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
BrownTopscMl
gray, line to coarse SAND, some Silt, some -Munictpte Waste, Plastic and Paper products
Municipal Waste
PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some -Metal (cans), some Asphalt shingles, and
Wood (demo debris)
Brush
Municipal Waste
PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some Metal (cans), little Cloth
1 tire
2A
2A, 1B
2A
REMARKS-
TEST PTTPLAN20
10
NORTHXUME. 145cu.Vd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
6M8'
COUNT
tETTER
DgSWNATION
A
36* OR LARGER
PROPORTIONSUSED
TRACE (TR)
LITTLE (U)SOME (so)AND
0-10%
10-20%20-35%as-60%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
OBSERVED OnOUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZA GEOENVIHONMENTAL, INC.«"»8ROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, fll
fEeHNICAUGEOHYDROLOQICALLOCATION;
PMQJECT
ROSE HILI LANDFILL
SOUTH KINGSTOWN. RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NO.:
FH.fi NO!
DATE:
TP-7
32090.5
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd.
MODEL:REACH:
320 lc-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED: 12:15
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
— -22-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
16.5' bfown fine to coarse SAND, some-Silt
2V BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION - POSSIBLE BOLDER
REMARKS:
1. No water was encountered during excavation.
TEST PIT PLAN20
10
NORTH
'JUME» 145 cu. yd.
LEGEND:BOULDER
SIZE RANGE
CLASSIFICATIONC--18'
18"-36"SB' OR LARGER
terreaDESIGNATION
'. ,-k'^,-*'
or.'..:...
PROPORTIONS
USED
TRACE (TR)
LITTLE (LI)
SOME (SO)AND
0-10%
10-20%
20-35%
EXCAVATION
CFFORT£ EASYM l/KDOEHATE
0 OtFFICSAT
r OBSERVED eROUNDWATER LEVEL
QZA OEOENVIRONMeNTAL, INC.IPADWAY, PROVIDENCE, fll
GcOteCHNICAL/QEOHYDRCXOQICAL^MTWTS
GZA WSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR:OPERATOR:
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE:CAPACITY:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
-8-
-0-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
TEST PIT FIELD LOG,; . r-r , PROJECT
DEscniPwafc' f > nose HJU. LANDFILL
LOCATION; > i , , S6UTH KINGSTOWN, ftHOOE ISLAND11 * , -.i* f * •'
IfcSIPITNO.: .- tP-6
FILENOJ teaoos
DAT& , *[ lOrWW
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTCYNTY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 Ic -3 TIME STARTED: 07:001.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6- BrownTopsoK
Cover Soil
ligh) brown, fine to coarse SAND, some-Silt, fettle fine to coarse Gravel
Municipal Waste
PLASTIC and PAPER products, some Glass, some Metal, (bottles and cans) Mtle+
Cloth, little + Wood
Municipal Waste
PLASTIC and PAPER Products, some Glass, some Wood, some Sand
Municipal Waste
WOOD, some Paper, little Gates. Mile Cloth
Municipal Waste
BRUSH, some Cloth and Packaging Material, some Wood
REMARKS
>- - TEST P(T PLAN
1' 20
, t f -,
."'•' t' ";,* WORTH
UME- 170cu.yd.
tEGEND:BOULDER
size RANGECLASSIFICATION
SVIS'ir-w
36- OR LARGER
joo|t j r" ;; ':
' P?; -A-/-V- % i,8,-,,
• 'c ''•"-'-•• ' ',
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
1A
2A
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONS ,
USED
TfiAcecrn) o-iofcuraepj) i<wp% :
SOME (SO) 3&&V.
AND 35-60%
EXCAVATION '
• 'CFFORT " , .£ , * .: EASy
M MODERATED DIFFICULT i
V~±T OBSERVED GflOUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGZA GEOENvlfiONMENTAL, INC.- 1HOAOWAY, PROV1D6NCE, R1
. fEGHNICAUGEOHYDROLOQKJALCONSULTANTS
OESCfllPtlCfcl: ROSE HILL LANDFILL.
LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NQ.1
FILE NO.I
DATE:
TP-8
saaaos
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE
WEATHER. OVERCAST 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR: TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd.
MODEL:REACH:
320 te-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
07:00
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-16-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-22-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
20' Wood, (Stumps, logs), some fine to coarse Sand and Silt
23' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
REMARKS:
TEST PIT PLAN20
to
tNORTH
UME. 170cu. yd.
LtGEND:
BOULDER
SIZE RANGE
CLASSIFICATION
6M6'
COUNT
36- OR LARGER
DESIGNATION
A8•C ......
PROPORTIONS
USED
TRACE 0"n)LITTLE (U)
SOME (SO)AND
0-10%10-20%
20-35%
35-60%
EXCAVATION
EFFORTE EASYM MODERATE0 DIFFICULT
- OBSERVED GBOUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGIQZAGEOENVIRONMENTAL, INC. PROJECT'• "veBOADWAY.PROVlDENCe B!
DESCRIPTION: * ROSE HILL LANDFILL
_. .JTECHNICAUOEOHYDROLOQICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PiT NOJ TP-»
FILENO.I aaoaoi
DATE: 1(VB«8
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR- D CAPACCHKDNE CONTRACTOR: CYN
OPERATOR: TV GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 te-3 TIME STARTED:
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu.yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED.
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
r *-9-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6' BrownTopsoU
hghl brown, orange, line to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel
gray, fine to coarse SAND and line to coarse Gravel, Wtte Boulders, little silt
gray, fin« to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, little Boulders, mtersperced with orange
rotten rock
gray, fine to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, some Silt
REMARKS
TE
10
ST PIT PLAN20
TNORTH
LUME. 17Sou. yd.
LEGEND:
BOULDER COUNT
SIZE RANGE LETTER
CLASSIFICATION DESiaNATKW
6M8' A18" 6- B
36' O« LARGER C
EXCAV.
EFFORT
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
3A
4A/1B/2C
10A
6A
5A
7A/1B
4A
10A
8A
14A
11A.3B
10A
9A
REMARK
NO.
PROPORTIONS
USED
TfiACE (TR) 0-10%LITTLE (U) 1O2OT4
SOME (SO) 2045%AND 3S-SO%
EXCAVATION
EFFORTE EASY
M MODERATE0 DIFFICULT
v— — OBSERVED GROUNOWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGUZA QEOEN VIHONMENTAL, INC, ; r , •*'* BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE Rl
DESCRIPTION;
CONSULTANTS LOCATION;
PROJECT
ROSE HILL LANDFILL
SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NQJ TP-8
FILE NO.: 32090.5
DATS: 10/9/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR: CYN
OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED:
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED: 14:15
DEPTH
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-22-
•23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
gray, fine to coarse SAND and fine to coarse Gravel, some Silt
gray, fine to coarse SAND, some + Silt
25' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
REMARKS:
— , -
to
;ST PIT PLAN
20
NORTH
'IME- 175cu, yd.
LEGEND:BOULDER COUtf
SIZE RANGE UETTgCLASSIFICATION DEStGNAl
CMS- A
ir-36' B
36* OR LARGER C
EXCAV.
EFFORT
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
6A
7A
5A
3A
4A
10A
REMARK
NO.
r PROPORTIONS
USED
R
DON TRACE (TR) 0-10%
LITTLE (U) 10-20%
SOME (SO) 20-35%
AND 35-60%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASY
M MODERATED DIFFICULT
v— !— OBSERVED GROUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGQZA GEQENVIRONMENTAL, INC.I' "» BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, Rl
DeSCHIPTtON:
r . rECHNICAUGEOHYOHOLOGICALCONSULTANTS LOCATION:
PflOJECT
ROSE HILL LANDFILL
SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
TEST PIT NO.: TP-10
RLE NO- 3200045
DATE:
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTGZA INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE CONTRACTOR: CYN
OPERATOR: TY GINGRICH GROUND ELEV.:WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's MAKE: HYUNDAI MODEL: 320 lc-3 TIME STARTED:
CAPACITY: 1.5 cu. yd. REACH: 25 FT. TIME COMPLETED:
DEPTH
-1-
-2-
-3-
-4-
-5-
-6-
-7-
r~ *-8-
-10-
-11-
-12-
-13-
-14-
SOIL DESCRIPTION
6" BrownTopsoil
light brown, orange, line to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt
gray, fine to coarse SAND, little Silt, some line to coarse Gravel
REMARKS
n
7
ST prr PLAN20
-+NORTH
UIMEx 110cu. yd.
LEGEND;BOULDER COW
SIZE RANGE LETTSCLASSIFICATION DESIGNA!
6--18- A1B"-36" B
36* OR LARGER C
EXCAV.
EFFORT
E
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
2A.3B
38,1 A
4B.6A
2B.3A
1A.2B
4A.1B
3A
2B.4A
3A
4A
REMARK
NO.
r PROPORTIONS
USED
R
(ION TRACE (TR) 0-10%
LITTLEM 10-20%
SOME (SO) 20-35%AND 35-60%
£
M
D
V(J
EXCAVATION6FFORT
EASYMODERATE
DIFflCULT
3SERV6D GHOUNDWATER LEVEL
TEST PIT FIELD LOGwNMcNl AL, WIG,
*»BC*DWAy, PROVIDENCE, Rl
<SK . eOHNICALASEOHYDROLOOICALCONSULTANTS
DESCRIPTION: ROSE HILL LANDF1LL
LOCATION: SOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
! rit
FILE NO;:
DATE;
TP-10
32090 J5
JO/9/98
EXCAVATION EQUIPMENTG2A INSPECTOR: D. CAPACCHIONE
WEATHER: OVERCAST 60's
CONTRACTOR: CYNOPERATOR. TY GINGRICH
MAKE: HYUNDAICAPACITY: 1.5
MODEL:cu. yd. REACH.
320 lc-325 FT.
GROUND ELEV.:TIME STARTED:TIME COMPLETED:
DEPTH SOIL DESCRIPTION EXCAV.
EFFORT
BOULDER
COUNT
QTY. CLASS
REMARK
NO.
-15-
-16-
-17-
-18-
-19-
-20-
-21-
-22-
-23-
-24-
-25-
-26-
-27-
-28-
gray, fine to coarse SAND, some - fine to coarse Gravel, little Silt
light brown, fine to coarse SAND, some fine to coarse Gravel, little
23' BOTTOM OF EXPLORATION
REMARKS:
TEST PIT PLAN
£0
10
NORTHME* 110cu. vd.
LEGEND:
BOULDER
SIZE RANGECLASSIFICATION
SMS"
36* On LARGER
COUNT
tETTER
DESIGNATIONABC
PROPORTIONSUSED
THACE (TR)
LITTLE (U)SOME (SO)AMD
0-10%10-20%20-36%35-50%
EXCAVATIONEFFORT
E EASYM MODERATED DIFFICULT
OBSERVED 6ROUNDWATER LEVEL
>z\1D
n
APPENDIX C
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
ROSEHILL LANDFILLSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
Photograph 1 - Test Pit 1
Photograph 2 - Test Pit 2
ROSEHILL LANDFILLSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
Photograph 3 - Test Pit 3
Photograph 4 - Test Pit 4
ROSEHILL LANDFILLSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
Photograph 5 - Test Pit 5
Photograph 6 - Test Pit 6
ROSEHILL LANDFILLSOUTH KINGSTOWN, RHODE ISLAND
. • v, V -• •
Photograph 7 - Test Pit 8
GZ\
ZoH^
XD
APPENDIX D
BORING LOGS
GZA GEOENV1RONMENTAL INC.
140 BROADWAY. PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NO.
Rose HM Larxtfia
South Kingstown. Rl
GEOTECH/GEOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
NK3CO
-MAN
GZA ENGINEER
Guild Drifting Co
Thomas Paquette
AlFkxi
SAMPLER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF
A 2- SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 1 40 *> HAMMER FALLING 30 IN
CASING. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING
A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN
SHEET
FILE NO.
GZ-2
loM
32090.4
CHKDBY JTU
BORING LOCATION
GROUND SURFACE ELEV
DATE START 10-23-98
DATUM
DATE END 10-23-98
GROUNDWATER READINGS
DATE
10-23-98
10-23-88
CASING SIZE: 5" OTHER 5* ODEX pneumatic hammer
DPTH
(FT)
5
10
r-is
20
25
30
35
CASING
(ft/mm)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
SAMPLE
NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/B"
TIME
1618
16-32
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
BURMISTER CLASSIFICATION
Gray, fine to coane SAND, some fine to
coarse Gravel. Wile' Cobbles
Orange, fine to coarse SAND, som
coarse Gravel
» fine to
22 BOTTOM OF BORING
WATER CASING
17.0 22
163 22
STRATUM
DESCRIPTION
GRAVELLY
SANDS
STABILIZATION TIME
0
15MIN
EQUIPMENT
INSTALLED
Z
5
T
Iff of
2-
PVC
slotted
wen
screen
Grout
2" PVC
aoM
riser
Bent
Seal
F
L
T
E
R
S
A
N
D
FIELD
TESTING
R
K
4ARKS
1. Stratum descriptions are based on observations of drill cuttings
NOTES: 1 ) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES. TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.2) WATER LEVEL READINGS HAVE BEEN MADE AT TIMES AND UNDER CONDITIONS STATED. FLUCTUATIONS OF GROUNDWATER TABLEMAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE
GZA BORING NO GZ-2
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL INC.
140 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE. RHODE ISLAND
GEOTECHK3EOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
3 CO
GZA ENGINEER
GuM Drilling Co.
Thomas Paquette
AlFlorl
PROJECT
Rose HU Landfill
South Nngstown. Rl
BORING LOCATION
GROUND SURFACE ELEV.
DATE START
SAMPLER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF
A 2" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 140 to. HAMMER FALLING 30 IN
CASING: UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING
A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN.
CASING SIZE: 5" OTHER 5" ODEX pneumatic hammer
DPTH
(FT)
5
10
IS
20
25
30
35
CASING
(D/rnn)
2
1
1
1
5
5
3
5
5
1
2
3
2
2
3
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
1
SAMPLE
NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/6-
10-23-98
REPORT OF BORING NO.
SHEET
RLE NO
CHKDBY
GZ-3
1of1
32090.4
JTU
DATUM
DATE END 10-23-98
GROUNDWATER READINGS
DATE
10-23-88
10-2348
10-23-98
TIME
1130
11:45
12.20
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
BURMISTER CLASSIFICATION
Gray, line to coourse SANO. some fine to
coarse Gravel. Mde* Cobbles
Orange, tine to coarse SAND, some ine to
coarse Gravel
23 BOTTOM OF BORING
WATER
19.7
18.2
18.1
CASING
22
22
22
STRATUM
DESCRIPTION
GRAVELLY SANDS
STABILIZATION TIME
0
15MIN
35MIN
EQUIPMENT
INSTALLED
2"
r
9-
Iff Of
2"
pvc
slotled
well
screen
Grout
2" PVC
sotd
riser
Bent
Seal
F
L
T
E
R
S
A
N
D
FIELD
TESTING
R
K
\RKS:
1. Stratum descriptions are based on observations of drill cuttings.
NOTES: 1) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES: TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
MAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE
GZA | BORING NO GZ-3
GZA GEOENVIRONMENTAL INC.
140 BROADWAY, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND
PROJECT REPORT OF BORING NO.
Rose Hill Landfill SHEET
South Kingstown. Rl
GEOTECH/GEOHYDROLOGICAL CONSULTANTS
•ING CO
.sftEMAN
GZA ENGINEER
Guild Drilling Co
Thomas Paquetle
Dave Capacchnne
SAMPLER. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SAMPLER CONSISTS OF
A 2" SPLIT SPOON DRIVEN USING A 140 Ib HAMMER FALLING 30 IN
CASING- UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. CASING DRIVEN USING
A 300 LB HAMMER FALLING 24 IN
FILE NO.
CHKDBY
GZ-4
1of1
32090.4
JTU
BORING LOCATION
GROUND SURFACE ELEV
DATE START 10-22-88
(
DAT
JATUM
EEND 10-23-98
GROUNDWATER READINGS
DATE
10-22-98
10-22-98
CASING SIZE 5' OTHER 5" ODEX pneumatic hammer
OPTH
(FT)
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
CASING
mnffl
1
1
1
1
2
5
4
4
3
3
2
1
2
2
1
3
4
2
3
4
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
SAMPLE
NO PEN/REC DEPTH (FT) BLOWS/6"
TIME
1330
1345
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
BURMISTER CLASSIFICATION
Gray, fine to coarse SAND, some line to
coarse Gravel, little' Cobbles
Orange line to coarse SAND, some One to
coarse Gravel
271 BOTTOM OF BORING
WATER CASING
25 25
22 25
STRATUM
DESCRIPTION
GRAVELLY SANDS
STABILIZATION TIME
0
15MIN
EQUIPMENT
INSTALLED
Z
121
15-
Iff of
2"PVC
slotted
wen
screen
Grout
2-PVC
SoM
riser
Bent
Seal
F
L
T
E
R
S
A
N
D
FIELD
TESTING
R
K
•MARKS
1. Stratum descriptor!* are based on observations of or* cuttings.
NOTES 1 ) STRATIFICATION LINES REPRESENT APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY BETWEEN SOIL TYPES: TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.2) WATER LEVEL READINGS HAVE BEEN MADE AT TIMES AND UNDER CONDITIONS STATED. FLUCTUATIONS OF GROUNDWATER TABLEMAY OCCUR DUE TO OTHER FACTORS THAN THOSE PRESENT AT THE TIME MEASUREMENTS WERE MADE
GZA BORING NO GZ-4
>z\
mZDXin
APPENDIX E
LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSISGROUNDWATER AND LEACHATE
M I T K E MCourouAi ION
GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.140 BroadwayProvidence, RI 02903Attn: Mr. Ed Summerly
iNOV 16 1998uavr7Lnu u
November 13, 1998
RE: Client Project #: 32090.4, Rosehill LandfillLab Project #: El788
Dear Mr. Summerly:
Enclosed please find the data report of the required analyses for the samples associatedwith the above referenced project. If you have any questions regarding this report, pleasecall me.
We appreciate your business.
Sine
Edward A. LawlerLaboratory Operations Manager
175 Metro Center Boulevard • Warwick, Rhode Island 02886-1755 • (401) 732-3400 • Fax (401) 732-3499email: [email protected]
M I T K E MC O K I ' O K M I O N
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Client Project: 32090.4, Rosehill Landfill
Lab Project: E1788
Date samples received: 10/28/98
Project Narrative
This data report includes the analysis results for seven (7) aqueous sample that was receivedfrom GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc. on October 28, 1998. Analyses were performed perspecification in the Chain of Custody form. For reference, a copy of the Mitkem Sample Log-In form is included for cross-referencing the client sample ID and laboratory sample ID.
All of the analyses were performed according to method specifications. No unusualoccurrences were noted during sample analysis.
This data report has been reviewed and is authorized for release as evidenced by the signaturebelow.
Edward A. LawlerLaboratory Operations Manager
001
INI I T K F M
COKI'OKATION
Analysis Report: Total Iron
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Matrix: Aqueous
Analysis Method: 6010
Concentration in: mg/L
Analysis Date: 10/30/98
LabjQ Client ID Result
E1788-01
E1788-02
E1788-03
E1788-04
E1788-05
E1788-06
GZ-2
GZ-3
GZ-4
LS-2
LS-3
LS-4
0.7
ND
0.9
250
33
88
Reporting Limit 0.3
QA/QC.
Method Blank
1029PBW2 ND
Lab Control Sample (% Recovery)
1029LCSW2 108
ND = Not Detected
Page 1 of 1 E1788-Tiron
M I T K E MC'ORI'ORAIION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: GZ-2Lab ID: E1788-01Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene N DBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-01
003
Client ID: GZ-2
M 1 TK E MC O U I ' O R A I I O N
Lab ID: E1788-01
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND34ND
97%95%95%
Page 2 of 2
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
E1788-01
004
M IT K E MCORPORATION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: GZ-3Lab ID: E1788-02Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1 -Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-02
005
Client ID: GZ-3
M I T K E MCOIU'OU \TION
Lab ID: E1788-02
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
96%96%93%
Page 2 of 2 E1788-02
006
INI I T K E MCOKI'OU \TION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: GZ-4Lab ID: E1788-03Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte BesullS
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-03
007
Client ID: GZ-4
M I T K E MCOKI'ORAIION
Lab ID: E1788-03
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrach loroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformI sopropy IbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ReportingLimils
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
95%97%94%
Page 2 of 2 E1788-03
008
M I T K E MCOIU'OK \TION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-2Lab ID: E1788-04Analysis. Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-04
009
Client ID: LS-2
M I T K E MCOKI'OKATION
Lab ID: E1788-04
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
95%96%93%
Page 2 of 2 E1788-04
0 1 0
\I I T K E !\|CORPORATION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-3Lab ID: E1788-05Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1 -Dich loroethene N DCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dich loroethene N DMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1.1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1.1-Dich loropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-05
Oil
Client ID: LS-3
M I T K E . MCORPORATION
Lab ID: E1788-05
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-I sopropy Itoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
99%97%93%
Page 2 of 2
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
E1788-05
Oli:
\I I T K E MCOWOK.VMON
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: LS-4Lab ID: E1788-06Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dich loropropene N D4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-06
013
Client ID: LS-4
iVI 1 T K £ MCOKI'OKVIION
Lab ID: E1788-06
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
99%96%92%
Page 2 of 2
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
E1788-06
014
M I T K E M
CORPORATION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID: TBGW102898Lab ID: E1788-07Analysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NOChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1-Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-07
Client ID: TBGW102898
M I TK F. MCOKI'OK \TION
Lab ID: E1788-07
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
94%95%93%
Page 2 of 2 E1788-07
M 1 T K E i\l
COKI'OKATION
Analysis Report: Volatile Organic Compounds
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.Client ID:Lab ID: Method Blank, V5B1102AAnalysis: Method 8260
Analyte Results
Dichlorodifluoromethane NDChloromethane NDVinyl chloride NDBromomethane NDChloroethane NDTrichlorofluoromethane ND1,1-Dichloroethene NDCarbon disulfide NDlodomethane NDAcetone NDMethylene chloride NDtrans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND1,1-Dichloroethane NDVinyl acetate ND2,2-Dichloropropane NDcis-1,2-Dichloroethene NDMethyl ethyl ketone NDBromochloromethane NDChloroform ND1,1,1-Trichloroethane NDCarbon tetrachloride ND1,1 -Dichloropropene NDBenzene ND1,2-Dichloroethane NDTrichloroethene ND1,2-Dichloropropane NDDibromomethane NDBromodichloromethane ND2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether NDcis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND4-Methyl-2-pentanone NDToluene ND
Analysis Date: 11/2/98Matrix: AqueousConcentration in: ug/LDilution: 1
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555
Page 1 of 2 E1788-MB
n t rt.. 1 /
Client ID:
M 1 T K E MCoimw.vriON
Lab ID: Method Blank, V5B1102A
Analyte
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene1,1,2-TrichloroethaneTetrachloroethene1,3-Dichloropropane2-HexanoneDibromochloromethane1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)Chlorobenzene1,1,1,2-TetrachloroethaneEthylbenzeneXylenes, totalStyreneBromoformIsopropylbenzeneBromobenzene1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1,2,3-Trichloropropanen-Propylbenzene2-Chlorotoluene4-Chlorotoluene1,3,5-Trimethylbenzenetert-Butylbenzene1,2,4-Trimethylbenzenesec-Butylbenzene1,3-Dichlorobenzene4-lsopropyltoluene1,4-Dichlorobenzene1,2-Dichlorobenzenen-Butylbenzene1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane1,2,4-TrichlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadiene1,2,3-TrichlorobenzeneMTBENaphthalene
Results
NDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDND
ReportingLimits
55555555555555555555555555555555555
QC Batch: V5B1102A
Surrogate Recovery:1,2-Dichloroethane-d4Toluene-d8Bromofluorobenzene
ND = Not Detected
99%96%93%
Page 2 of 2 E1788-MB
018
M I I K E M
CORI'OK VI ION
Analysis Report: Iron Bacteria
Client: GZA GeoEnvironmental, Inc.
Matrix: Aqueous
Analysis Method: SM9240B
Analysis Date: 10/29/98
LabJD
E1788-04
E1788-05
E1788-06
Client ID
LS-2
LS-3
Result
Absent
Absent
Absent
O i f l
Page 1 of 1 E1788-Bacteria
Subcontracted
00£1-HVJ
-ttS
"2o•ao
OQ of
5 1«. ?;
<u9O
<
1.0
V)
sfc
o
<22T3V
UOCO.0
O
2o
T3
§
C!o
ooCio
OO
CJo
oo
ooCJo
000
OO
CJo
•o•oM
o
•8•o•oOJQ.e6.
i§
•21
ou
o
oo
§
o
o
oo
00§OOg\ooC}o
V~l
•*{
oo
oo§
O
OOOX
00
o
oo<N
OO
oo
o
4>•§
U
Ae
.H+•»08
•IUH BLl
o o <s\o so oo
•Itu GL,
O O
%£E ,s«> Ib Ou
Uo>
^^^ ^^^
o U 2 uJ2 u, o< 22
o o oO O <NVO vo 00
O O O— _ VOO O «NVO vo OO
o o o
— — VOO O <NVO VO OO
o o oO O (SVO >O 00
oVO(Noo
No
No
oooooo
No
oooooor-
(N00
oooo00
oooooo
c/o
VOooooooI—
oofNo
£O
r-oooooor-
020
0000
V)
2o
I.£>
(N
<N
oo
O
COWOOuUoz
uC
su
uB
o —•2 .•'too.b -j i-] i <
co Hvo
T°?
e«
Iu
C
OvOm<N •* •-'°. S
<° ° r^ <o
erly
Geo
Envi
Bro
adw
ayid
ence
,40
1-4
401-
r-~«
G Br vid
<^<L'sS2<g^u:021
dO
q
CDo
(0
a
a.
82
iO
U.
CLOo
gUI
101
6
8UJ
i
-^
1
CH
AIN
-OF-
CU
STO
DY
R
EC
OR
D
CO0 *
1-5 §K * O
^'T^cl ^n^S
.-ynci-^dr m
|piMiini«if /•) 6uu«i|ij
Q
r 8 d101
§ A^OHd
UJGC 10016 P0«l OS Hdlrn11
< SZ9
N8 r v r Hvd r tuza
i»d r sod r MM r
.*»
SIM
KM r oa»r
«n.»r
«< )»e,r
rzosr, r»zsr
"^^
n«H
puoon H^r
i .iiiii
Dat
e/Ti
me
(Ver
y Im
porta
nt)
fo
eci
>
^c
vS
c<en
1-o
OS1
^
Qc,
*
TV'
1I
\
^
3
c<
X
^
o
-^
T
3
*
X
X
V
5V/l
2 "
\
3
^
X.
K
>
3
m^~ —
1
0
^
X
X
X
V
•y
-V
J
-
X
V
a
io
0^£
\- | PR
ES
ER
VA
TIV
E
(Cl
• H
CI,
N -
HN
O,,
S •
H,S
O,,
Na
- N
aOH
, O
- O
ther
)'
| CO
NTA
INE
R T
YP
E
(P-P
last
lc,
G-Q
lass
, V
-Via
l, T-
Teflo
n, 0
-Oth
er)
'
ng li
mits
, kn
own
cont
amin
atio
n, e
tc3
have
bee
n pr
eser
ved
w/
1 1
HC
L )
. ->
- A
V
-»
-
ves,
spec
ial r
epor
tlo
ted,
all
VO
A v
ial
i ,
r\
MO
TES
Pre
serv
atU
nles
s ot
herw
ise
RE
LIN
QU
ISH
ED
BY
(A
ffilia
tion)
DA
TE
/TIM
E
RE
PB
IVE
D B
XH
Affi
hatio
n)
00U
* «&
.%,-
"*"te/^
O
L/J
L-^
F
2^^i0
^
?I/S
tf
** £*>
t.R
ELI
NQ
UIS
HE
D B
Y
(Affi
liatio
n)
DA
TE/T
IME
R
EC
EIV
dC"B
Y
(Affi
liatio
n)^
§'S
<r
RE
LIN
QU
ISH
ED
BY
(A
ffilia
tion)
DA
TE
/TIM
E
RE
CE
IVE
D B
Y (
•*»
V
SUs
TUR
NA
RO
UN
D T
IME
n S
tand
ard
n R
ush
Day
s, A
ppro
ved
hy
Oz
OO-
0(TO
UJ
^
cs
'dr
-J
.Jr0
i-
o_
M^^s
V]
V
of
-^
LOC
ATI
ON
$L
u.0
IsUJ
» -4-
£
1
o
1 P
RO
JEC
T M
AN
AG
ER
"-O
C
su
.n\m
ff \ y
tX
I
O to ro
GZ
A G
EOEN
VIRO
NMEN
TAL,
INC.
EN
GIN
EE
RS
AN
D S
CIE
NTIS
TS
140
Bro
adw
ayP
RO
VID
EN
CE
, R
l 029
03(4
01)4
21-4
140
FAX
(40
1) 7
51 -8
61 3
Last Page of Data Report
023
GZ\
"OtnZDX
APPENDIX F
LABORATORY CERTIFICATES OF ANALYSIS - SOIL GAS
@AIR TOXICS LTD.AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL LABORATORY
CLIENT:
PHONE:FAX:DATE RECEIVED:DATE COMPLETED:
WORK ORDER #: 9812162Work Order Summary
Mr. David CapacchioneGZA GeoEnvironmental140 BroadwayProvidence, RI 02903
401-421-4140401-751-861312/10/9812/23/98
BILL TO: Same
P.O. # NRPROJECT # 32090 Rosehill landfill
FRACTION #01A02A03A04A05A05B
NAMEG2SG (13-300C)G2SG (3-300)G2SG( 11+600)G2SG (11+500)Lab BlankLab Blank
TESTTO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14TO-14
RECEIPTVAC7PRES.
1.0 "Hg0.4 psi0.4 psi5.0 "Hg
NANA
LAB NARRATIVE:Compounds detected between the detection limit and the low point on the curve are "J" flagged.
CERTIFIED BY: DATE:Laboratory Director
Certification numbers: CA ELAP - 1149, NY ELAP - 11291, UT ELAP - E-217
180 BLUE RAVINE ROAD, SUITE B FOLSOM, CA 95630(916) 985-1000 • (800) 985-5955 . FAX (916) 985-1020
Page 1
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(13-300C)
ID#: 9812162-01A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound
Freon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 ,1 -DichloroetheneFreon 1 1 3Methylene Chloride1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Det. Limit (ppbv)
8.78.78.78.78.78.78.78.78.78787878.78.78.78.787878.7878.78.78.78.78.78.78787878.78.78787878787878.78.7353535353535
Amount (ppbv)
17J28 J
Not Detected450
Not Detected180
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
48Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
130Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
1200Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
9502600390
Not DetectedNot Detected
130180
Not Detected16J
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
50 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Page 2
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(13-300C)
ID#: 9812162-01AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC7MS Full Scan
Compound Pet. Umlt (ppbv)
J = Estimated value.Q = Exceeds Quality Control limits of 70% to 130%, due to matrix effects.Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister
Amount (ppbv)
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
353535353535353535353535353535
Not DetectedNot Detected
2400Not Detected
720Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
260Not DetectedNot Detected
670
SurrogatesOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
% Recovery8199
157 Q
Method Limits70-13070-13070-130
Page 3
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(3-300)
ID#: 9812162-02A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
CompoundFreon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Det. Limit (ppbv)878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787878787353535353535
Amount (ppbv)13048
Not Detected74
Not Detected150
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
10J270
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
250Not Detected
28 JNot DetectedNot Detected
200Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
290038001100
Not Detected27 J110280
Not Detected22J
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
9646 J
Not DetectedNot Detected
Page 4
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(3-300)
ID#: 9812162-02A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv)
J = Estimated value.Q = Exceeds Quality Control limits of 70% to 130%, due to matrix effects.Container Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister
Amount (ppbv)
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
353535353535353535353535353535
Not DetectedNot Detected
890Not Detected
470Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
250Not DetectedNot Detected
1200
Surrogates % Recovery Method LimitsOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
7998
150 Q
70-13070-13070-130
Page 5
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : G2SG(11+600)
H)#: 9812162-03AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv) Amount (ppbv)Freon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 , 1 -DichloroetheneFreon 1 1 3Methylene Chloride1 ,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500650065006500260002600026000260002600026000
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
860000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
7900 JNot Detected
11000JNot Detected
1400000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
13000JNot DetectedNot Detected
22000 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
8100JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
71000Not Detected
Page 6
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME: G2SG(11+600)
ID#: 9812162-03A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
Det. Limit (ppbv)
260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000260002600026000
Amount (ppbv)
Not DelectedNot DetectedNot Detected
28000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
55000 JNot DetectedNot Detected
J = Estimated valueContainer Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister
SurrogatesOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
% Recovery9010184
Method Limits70-13070-13070-130
Page 7
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : G2SG(11+500)
ID#: 9812162-04AEPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
CompoundFreon 12Freon 1 1 4ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1 , 1 -Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1,2-DichloroethaneTrichloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Det. Limit (ppbv)540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400540054005400210002100021000210002100021000
Amount (ppbv)Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
800000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
9400 JNot Detected
13000JNot Detected
1700000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
15000JNot DetectedNot Detected
26000Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
9800 JNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Page 8
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : G2SG(11+500)
ID#: 9812162-04A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
Det. Limit (ppbv)
210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000210002100021000
Amount (ppbv)
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
J = Estimated valueContainer Type: 6 Liter Summa Canister
SurrogatesOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
% Recovery8910085
Method Limits70-13070-13070-130
Page 9
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : Lab Blank
ID#: 9812162-05A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
CompoundFreon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11 ,1 -DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,1 ,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem,p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
Det. Limit (ppbv)0.500.500.500500.500.500.500.500500.500500500500500500500500.500.500.500.500.500500.500500.500500500500.500500500500.500.500500.500.500502.0202020202.0
Amount (ppbv)Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Page 10
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : Lab Blank
ID#: 9812162-05A
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
Del. Limit (ppbv)
202.02.02.02.02.02.02.0202.02.02.02.0202.0
Amount (ppbv)
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Container Type: NA
SurrogatesOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
% Recovery779495
Method Limits70-13070-13070-130
Page 11
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : Lab Blank
ID#: 9812162-05B
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Compound Pet. Limit (ppbv) Amount (ppbv)Freon 12Freon 114ChloromethaneVinyl ChlorideBromomethaneChloroethaneFreon 1 11,1-DichloroetheneFreon 113Methylene Chlonde1,1-Dichloroethanecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1,1,1 -TnchloroethaneCarbon TetrachlondeBenzene1 ,2-DichloroethaneTnchloroethene1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneToluenetrans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene1 ,1 ,2-TnchloroethaneTetrachloroetheneEthylene DibromideChlorobenzeneEthyl Benzenem.p-Xyleneo-XyleneStyrene1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 ,3,5-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,2,4-Tnmethylbenzene1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene1 ,4-DichlorobenzeneChlorotoluene1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene1 ,2,4-TnchlorobenzeneHexachlorobutadienePropylene1 ,3-ButadieneAcetoneCarbon Disulfide2-Propanoltrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
0500500500.500.500.500.500.500500500.500500500500500500500.500.500.500.500.500.500.500500.50050050050050050050050050050050050050050202020202020
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Page 12
AIR TOXICS LTD.SAMPLE NAME : Lab Blank
ID#: 9812162-05B
EPA METHOD TO-14 GC/MS Full Scan
Illllillll ^Compound
Vinyl Acetate2-Butanone (Methyl Ethyl Ketone)HexaneTetrahydrofuranCyclohexane1 ,4-DioxaneBromodichloromethane4-Methyl-2-pentanone2-HexanoneDibromochloromethaneBromoform4-EthyltolueneEthanolMethyl tert-Butyl EtherHeptane
Det. Limit (ppbv)
2.02.02.02.02.02.0202.02.02.02.02.02.02.02.0
Amount (ppbv)
Not DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot DetectedNot Detected
Container Type: NA
Surrogates % Recovery Method LimitsOctafluorotolueneToluene-d84-Bromofluorobenzene
9510391
70-13070-13070-130
Page 13
oto gUJ Vt £=? oo~ o
Q
H
C/5U
OH
HCDD)COo.
•DC
1<C
D
"*
U:
CD
CO
o q "g" 'oa. CL CL CL
v)S-
co
g.Kl <*\
^2
CO
40
1
By:
Sig
CDCL >
O S SCO f^ QJ
c E -D o =O O T3 ^ OO O < O. O
lecte
d
1
'c «
<5i
T3
CO
crCD
CCcooCO
16
CDEi-08OJCOQ
.CDQ.ECO
CO5CD
¥
O
acv\
o
o
o
Uvi
Saro
l^t7
V)
Vv
!CM
0)O
X,
cv
CN
S0^£ NJ&
V