sunray independent school district
DESCRIPTION
Sunray Independent School District. 2008 AEIS Performance Report. District and Campus Ratings. District Recognized High SchoolAcceptable Middle SchoolRecognized ElementaryAcceptable. 2007/2008 Comparison of TAKS Results Subgroups. 2007/2008 Comparison TAKS Results Subgroups. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Sunray Independent School Sunray Independent School DistrictDistrict
20082008
AEISAEIS
Performance Performance Report Report
District and Campus Ratings
District Recognized
High School Acceptable
Middle School Recognized
Elementary Acceptable
2007/2008 Comparison of TAKS Results Subgroups
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
07LA/Read 07Math 07 Sci
DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk
2007/2008 Comparison TAKS Results Subgroups
0
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
07 Writing 08 Writing 07 SS 08 SS
DistrictHispanicWhiteEco.DisSp. EdLEPAt-Risk
2008 TAKS Results Compared to State & Region Results
010
2030
4050
6070
80
90100
LA/Read Math Writing Science SS
StateRegion 16District
3rd Grade
0
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
Reading Math Writing
3rd-033rd-043rd-053rd-063rd-073rd-08
4th Grade Longitudinal
0
1020
3040
5060
7080
90100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-074th-08
5th Grade Longitudinal
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-064th-075th-08
6th Grade Longitudinal
0
1020
3040
5060
708090
100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-054th-065th-076th-08
7th Grade Longitudinal
0
10
2030
4050
6070
8090
100
Reading Math Writing Science
3rd-044th-055th-066th-077th-08
8th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Science SS
3rd-034th-045th-056th-067th-078th-08
9th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Science SS
4th -035th -046th-057th-068th-079th-08
10th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Science Writing SS
5th-036th-047th-058th-069th-0710th-08
11th Grade Longitudinal
50
60
70
80
90
100
Reading Math Writing Soc Stud Science
6th-037th-048th-059th-0610th-0711th-08
2008 State Testing Participation
0102030405060708090
100
Total TAKS T-Acc T-M T-Alt Combo
StateRegionDistrict
Criteria for meeting AYP:
1. AYP performance requirements are met if the percent Met Standard for all students and each student group summed across grades 3-8 and 10 in reading/language arts and mathematics meets or exceeds AYP standard.
• The AYP standards for 2007-2008 are 60% for reading/ELA and 50% for Math
• The AYP standards gradually increase.
• By 2013-2014, the standards are 100 percent for both reading/language arts and mathematics.
2. AYP participation requires 95 percent of all students and each student group to be tested to meet participation requirements, calculated separately for reading & math.
3. Other AYP requirements must be met for all students: 70% graduation rates for high schools and 90% attendance rates for middle and elementary schools.
District & Campus AYP
• Meets AYP and Participation
TELPAS – At Least One Proficiency Level Increase in
English Reading
• 3rd -5th */22 %
• 6th-8th */12 %
• 9-11th */14 %
* Unable to compute due to new test.
TELPAS - % LEP with Advanced /Advanced High Rating in English
Reading
• 3rd-5th 27%• 6th-8th 33%• 9-12th 14%Advanced –High
• 3rd-5th 32%• 6th-8th 50%• 9-12th 79%
Advanced
ESL Students Exited from Program
Grades 3 - 5 5 students
Grades 6 - 8 3 students
Grades 9 -11 7 students
Attendance Rates
90
95
100
State
Region16Sunray
01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07• State 95.6 95.6 95.7 95.7 95.5 95.5• Region 16 95.5 95.6 95.8 95.7 95.6 95.7• Sunray 96.7 96.8 97.3 96.7 96.9 96.3
7th and 8th Drop-out Rate
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
'05-06 '06-07
State Region16 Sunray
'05-06 '06-07State 0.4 0.2Region16 0.2 0.2Sunray 0 0
HS Drop-out Rate
0
1
2
3
4
5
'05-06 '06-07
State Region16 Sunray
'05-06 '06-07State 3.7 3.9Region16 2.9 2.5Sunray .6 2.2
Completion Rate
05
101520253035404550556065707580859095
100
State Region District
Grad. 05Grad. 06Grad. 07GED 05GED 06GED 07HS 05HS 06HS 07DO-4yr. 05DO -4yr. 06DO-4yr. 07
% in Advanced Courses• 2004 2005 2006 2007• State 19.9 20.5 21.0 22.1• Region16 18.2 17.7 17.7 18.3• Sunray 21.1 23.2 24.1 14.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
2004 2005 2006 2007
State Region16 Sunray
RHSP/DAP Graduates
• 2006– State 75.7– ESC 16 71.8– Sunray 94.3
• 2007– State 77.9– ESC 16 74.7– Sunray 87.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
2006 2007
State
ESC 16
Sunray
TSI – Higher Education Readiness Component
2008• English
– State 57– ESC 16 56– Sunray 50
• Math– State 56– ESC 16 54– Sunray 58
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
English Math
State
ESC 16
Sunray
SAT/ACT TEST DATA
2007 2006
STATE REGION16 SUNRAY
SAT Mean Score
992 991
1043 1038
* *
ACT Mean
Score 20.2 20.1
20.3 20.2
20.1 20.2
Violence and Criminal Incident Report
• Sunray ISD did not have any activity or actions that would be deemed violent or criminal in nature .
2007 Graduates Attending Higher Education in Fall 2007
• Total Graduates 30
• Amarillo College 7
• West Texas A&M 5
• Other 4 year Inst. 3
• Not trackable 3
• Not found 10
• Total Known Attending 15
Sunray Elementary
AEIS
2008
Subject
Year
State SES Hisp White Sp Ed
Eco D LEP
Reading
2008
89% 86% 73% 99% * 71% 56%
Reading 2007
89% 91% 84% 99% * 89% 57%
Reading
2006
90% 92% 92% 91% * * *
Math
2008
85% 67% 36% 90% * 38% 25%
Math 2007
82% 70% 63% 79% * 61% 29%
Math
2006
83% 81% 86% 75% * 67% *
SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 3
Comments for Previous Slide
• Reading had a slight drop overall and a significant drop in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and Economic Disadvantage.
• Math had a slight drop overall and a substantial drop in the following sub-categories: Hispanic and the Economic Disadvantage. However the White sub-category had a significant increase.
Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Read 08 85% 85% 82% 88% * 78% 67%
Read 07 84% 87% 88% 86% * 85% *
Read 06 83% 79% 69% 87% * 62% *
Math 08 87% 91% 94% 89% * 84% 83%
Math 07 86% 87% 94% 79% * 92% *
Math 06 84% 68% 57% 76% * 38% *
SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 4
Grade 4 Summary: Slight drop at the Campus Level and in the sub-categories of Hispanic and Economically Disadvantage for Reading. Math had an increase at the Campus Level and in the sub-category of White. Slight drop in the sub-category of Economically Disadvantaged.
Subject. State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Writ 08 93% 94% 99% 88% * 94% 99%
Writ 07 91% 80% 75% 86% * 77% *
Writ 06 92% 73% 62% 82% * 53% *
SES TAKS Data from AEISGrade 4
Grade 4 Summary: The campus level had a significant improvement in Writing and also in the sub-groups that included Hispanic, economically disadvantaged, and the LEP. Had a small gain in the white sub category.
SES Attendance Data from AEIS
Attendance State SES Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
06-07 95.5% 96.3% 96.3% 96.1% 97.0% 95.9% 95.9%
05-06 95.5% 96.9% 97.0% 96.7% 96.9% 97.4% 97.2%
Decrease
Increase0.0% -0.6% -0.7% -0.6% +0.1% -1.5% -1.3%
Summary: Attendance decreased overall for the campus and also decreased in all sub-groups except for Sp Ed.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program
• CAT Monitoring
• Parent Notification
• Saturday School and Summer School
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• Use of Released Tests • Practice testing on computerized assessment
to diagnosis during the school year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• Reading Specialist and Intensive Instruction• Accelerated Reading Instruction (before &
after school)• Accelerated Math Instruction (before & after
school)
Continuation from Previous Page
• Study Island
• My Reading Coach
• I-Station
• Symphony Math
• CraftPlus Writing Program
• Region 4 Materials Reading and Math
SUNRAY MIDDLE SCHOOL
2007-2008
AEIS information
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading 2006 81% 82% 71% 99% NA 64% NA
Reading 07 83% 87% 71% 99% NA 75% NA
Reading 08 85% 96% 93% 99% NA 99% NA
Math 2006 82% 86% 78% 99% NA 73% NA
Math 07 86% 71% 57% 82% NA 53% NA
Math 08 86% 90% 80% 99% NA 91% NA
Science 2006 76% 81% 75% 91% NA 70% NA
Science 07 74% 82% 73% 89% NA 78% NA
Science 08 82% 94% 87% 99% NA 92% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 5
Grade 5 Summary: Reading scores continue to rise in all groups. Math and Science went up and down in those years. We will continue to work on all areas. We will be working with all groups to keep those scores going up.
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading 06 92% 93% 94% 92% NA 95% NA
Reading 07 92% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA
Reading 08 94% 94% 93% 94% NA 94% NA
Math 2006 81% 91% 94% 88% NA 89% NA
Math 07 80% 79% 67% 99% NA 67% NA
Math 08 83% 91% 87% 94% NA 81% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 6
Grade 6 Summary: Reading scores went up from 06 to 07 and then they dropped back down a little. We were still at the state average for Reading. Math increased across the board from recent years.
Subject
Year
State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading 06 80% 87% 88% 86% NA 82% NA
Reading 07 85% 89% 84% 93% NA 82% NA
Reading 08 88% 97% 94% 99% NA 93% NA
Math 06 71% 82% 88% 77% NA 76% NA
Math 07 77% 91% 95% 89% NA 91% NA
Math 08 80% 79% 71% 92% NA 69% NA
Writing 06 89% 87% 84% 89% NA 86% NA
Writing 07 93% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA
Writing 08 93% 99% 99% 99% NA 99% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 7
Grade 7 Summary: The biggest area that we need work in is Math. We must continue to build the Math skills needed.
Subject Year State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Reading 06 84% 77% 59% 91% NA 46% NA
Reading 07 89% 88% 91% 85% NA 82% NA
Reading 08 95% 98% 99% 96% NA 99% NA
Math 06 68% 79% 59% 95% NA 62% NA
Math 07 73% 81% 86% 75% NA 73% NA
Math 08 79% 85% 82% 86% NA 82% NA
S. St. 06 84% 82% 65% 95% NA 62% NA
S. St. 07 84% 86% 78% 95% NA 78% 20%
S. St. 08 91% 91% 94% 90% NA 99% NA
Science 07 67% 86% 83% 90% NA 78% 20%
Science 08 69% 87% 82% 90% NA 89% NA
SMS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 8
Grade 8 Summary: Our subgroups were up in Reading and Math. We also jumped a little in Social Studies and we are above state average on Science. We need to continue working on improving the skills that students need for these subjects.
SMS Attendance Data from AEIS
Attendance State SMS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
05-06 95.5% 96.6% 97.3% 96.5% 95.3% 96.8% 96.9%
06-07 95.5% 96.9% 96.7% 96.5% 95.9% 96.1% 96.9%
Decrease
IncreaseEven Even -.6% Even +.6% -.7% Even
We would like for these to increase each year. These are a little higher from previous years. Received Gold Performance for Attendance.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program with recognition every six weeks for perfect attendance.
• CAT team Monitoring• Parents called when students do not show
up for more than one day of school.• Parent Notification for students that miss
extreme numbers of days.• Saturday School
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• Use of Released Tests• Use of TAG on COMPASS program to make
tests for benchmarking.• Use of TAKS Practice Materials including
Measuring Up for Math, Science and some Reading.
• New PAseries will be used for our reading practice. This is an online testing format.
• Use of Bobcat Breakout for those students struggling and falling behind in classroom assignments.
Sunray Middle School
Gold Performance Acknowledgements:Attendance 2006-2007Reading/ELAWritingScience Social Studies Comparable Improvement: Reading/ELA
Sunray High School
Subject
Year
State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed
Eco D LEP
Reading
2007
87% 85% 71% 99% NA 65% 20%
Reading Reading 20082008
87%87% 95%95% 90%90% 99%99% NANA 89%89% NANA
Math
2007
61% 80% 65% 95% NA 65% 33%
Math 2008
64% 78% 75% 81% NA 79% NA
2008 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS
Grade 9 Summary: Overall reading scores are up 10% and above state scores. All reading subgroups are up with very positive gains for Hispanic and Econ. Disad. groups. Math scores were down 2% overall with the White subgroups significantly down by 14%. Math scores are still not at the 80 & 90 percentage levels yet in all subgroups and overall, which is the aim for each testing period.
Grade 9
Subject. State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
ELA 07 85% 93% 90% 96% NA 92% NA
ELA 08 89% 98% 94% 99% NA 92% 99%
Math 07 65% 68% 57% 78% NA 63% NA
Math 08 66% 72% 53% 89% NA 67% 20%
Sci 07 57% 56% 42% 71% 60% 56% NA
Sci 08 65% 66% 41% 86% NA 54% 20%
SS 07 85% 75% 67% 83% 99% 70% NA
SS 08 89% 87% 71% 99% NA 77% 40%
2008 SHS TAKS Data from AEISGrade 10
Grade 10 Summary: ELA and Soc. St. continue to be a strength. All groups were up or the same in both of these core areas. Science and Math core areas both had drops in the Hispanic group and Science also had a drop in the Econ. Disadv. subgroup. These were small drops in these two subgroups, but they were still drops and not gains. All of the scores at the 10th grade need to be raised to the 80 and 90 percentage levels, but the overall scores in the four core areas had increases from 2007 to 2008.
2008 SHS TAKS Data from AEIS
Subject
State SHS Hisp. White Sp Ed Eco Dis
LEP
ELA 07 89% 91% 83% 99% NA 81% NA
ELA 08 91% 90% 83% 95% NA 90% NA
Math 07 79% 89% 89% 88% NA 88% NA
Math 08 80% 89% 82% 95% NA 80% NA
Sci 07 76% 74% 61% 88% NA 63% NA
Sci 08 81% 83% 74% 91% NA 64% NA
SS 07 93% 89% 78% 99% NA 88% NA
SS 08 95% 95% 89% 99% NA 82% NA
Grade 11
Grade 11 Summary: ELA was down overall, but all subgroups saw increases or stayed the same. Social Studies saw gains overall and in all subgroups. Both of these core areas have all groups in the 80 and 90 percentage levels. The Science area was up overall, and Math remained the same overall. Math had drops in the Hispanic and Econ. Disadv. groups, but the math scores were all at the 80% or above level. Our Hispanic and Econ. Disadv. groups continue to be lower than the other subgroups. Science scores, which have been a concern continue to have gains each year at the exit level.
2008 SHS Attendance Data from AEIS
NOTE: This is not current-year data. AEIS reports attendance behind other AEIS data.
Attendance State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
05-06 95.5% 97.1% 96.4% 97. 6% 95.4% 96.2% 96.9%
06-07 95.5% 96.4% 96.1% 96.8% 95.8% 96.0% 96.0%
Decrease
Increase0.0% -0.7% -0.3% -0.8% +0.4% -0.2% -0.9%
Summary: We want these percentages to increase each year. There were slight decreases overall both last year and this year except the LEP subgroup that had a .7% gain last year and the Special Ed group that had a.4% gain this year. Need to get the decreases to be increases. We want to stay above the 95% level and we are only 1.4% above in the overall attendance rate for SHS.
SHS Completion Rate Data from 2008 AEISNote: This is not current-year data. It is reported behind other AEIS data.
Completion
Rate 2007State SHS Hisp White Sp Ed Eco D LEP
Grad. 78% 91.2% 85% 100% NA 88.9% 40.0%
GED 2.0% 0% 0% 0% NA O% 0%
Cont. HS 8.7% 2.9% 5.0% 0% NA 5.6% 20.0%
DO (4-yr) 11.4% 5.9% 10.0% 0% NA 5.6% 40.0%
Completion Rate 2006
Grad 80.4% 97.1% 100.0% 95.7% NA 100% NA
GED 2.3% 2.9% 0% 4.3% NA 0% NA
Cont. HS 8.6% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
DO (4-yr) 8.8% 0% 0% 0% NA 0% NA
Summary: Our completion rate is down from 2006. We are well above the state percentage. Our Hispanic and Econ. Disadv. subgroups are the groups of concern in the completion rate for the 2007 AEIS data.
Strategies for Attendance Improvement
• Attendance Incentive Program• Exemption Policy• Bobcat Scholarship• SCAT Monitoring• Parent Notification for Absences• Saturday School and Summer School• STAR Program• Learning Lab for Makeup Work & Extra Support• Morning Tutorials for Failures, Makeup Work and Extra
Support for Coursework
Strategies for Completion Rate Dropout Improvement
• Timely Identification of At Risk• TAKS Remediation & Intensive Instruction• Saturday School for Attendance Problems• Credit Recovery and Credit Accrual in Summer
School and Saturday School• SCAT Monitoring & Intervention Plans• CHAMPS Academy• Dropout Recovery with GED and CHAMPS• WBL Program To Support Students Who Need To
Work• Personal Graduation Plans for At Risk• Priority of Services for Migrant Students
Strategies for TAKS Improvement• Use of Nova Net, Study Island, & Other Computer-
Assisted Programs• Analysis/Use of Released State Tests• Use of TEA TAKS Study Guides• Practice /Benchmark Testing Days for Diagnosis of
Strong and Weak Areas at Mid-Year• Use of TAKS Practice Materials• 1-on-1 Intensive Instruction for TAKS ELL Failures• TAKS Class for Senior Retakers & for Juniors Who
Failed 10th Grade TAKS• TAKS Intervention Period for 9th and 10th TAKS
Failures • Summer TAKS Class Before July Testing
Strategies for TAKS Improvement
• TAKS Conferences with Students on Objectives Failed• Individual Conferences with Parents of Students Who
Failed TAKS for Input on Personal Graduation Plan• Personal Graduation Plans for TAKS Failures• Daily and/or Weekly TAKS Drills in Core Subject Classes• Individual Educational Plans for Students Who Are ELL • Placement in Core Area Class for Senior Retakers and
All Juniors Who Failed TAKS• Saturday School for ELL Students for Lang. Dev. Skills
Needed for TAKS Testing & for Coursework Assistance
Accomplishments at SHSFocus on Student Service Projects
• Student Council Dinner for Senior Citizens• FCCLA Reading with Elementary, Ronald McDonald
House Supply Drive, Eveline Rivers Coat Drive• NHS Meals on Wheels & Hurricane Relief Effort for
School-Age Children• SHS Jr./Sr. Mentoring Program at Elementary and
Middle Schools• 9th Grade Success Class for Effective Transition to
High School Campus• Cheerleaders Service Projects Through Relay for
Life, Summer Reading Program at Elementary, & Operation Christmas Child
Sunray High School Gold Performance Acknowledgements
2007-2008
Attendance (2006-2007)Recommended High School Program
(Class of 2007)Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
MathematicsComparable Improvement: Reading/ELA
Student Demographics• Ethnicity 2008 2007
African American .4 .2Hispanic 50.0 52.9White 49.1 46.5Native American .2 0Asian/Pacific Islander .4 .4
• Economically Disadvantaged 44.9 53.5
• Limited English Proficient15.5 16.0
• At-Risk 31.8 34.7
Staff Data
Sunray State
• Years Exper. 13.4 11.3– In District 7.1 7.4
• Turnover Rate 14.0 15.2
• # Teachers 51.5 321,729.5
Enrollment Projections
• 1998-99 622• 1999-00 587• 2000-01 544• 2001-02 528• 2002-03 498• 2003-04 493• 2004-05 525• 2005-06 537• 2006-07 543• 2007-08 542• 2008-09 536475
525
575
62598-9999-0000-01'01-02'02-03'03-04'04-05'05-06'06-07'07-08'08-09
Budget HistoryYear Revenue Expenditure99/00 3,669,932 3,732,304 00/01 3,488,232 3,551,87301/02 4,869,628 4,290,25302/03 4,202,696 4,405,52603/04 3,912,864 3,735,21704/05 5,034,355 4,365,89905/06 5,173,849 4,700,58306/07 6,927,724 5,932,08007/08 5,761,499 5,597,03108/09 5,658,923* 5,597,031*Estimated *
Year Tax Rate Value Budget Results
98/99 1.53 172,813,464 - 96,306
99/00 1.53 155,368,954 - 62,372
00/01 1.536 162,618,685 - 63,641
01/02 1.571 210,135,837 579,375**
02/03 1.572 206,049,618 202,830 **
2003/04 1.6404 201,962,265 177,647
2004/05 1.6158 244,818,720 668,456 **
2005/06 1.5885 294,557,066 669,240**
2006/2007 1.4449 338,947,816 995,644
2007/2008 1.1483 322,679,875 119,468
2008/2009 1.13 397,653,507 7,591 Estimated
Fund Balance - Prior Audits98/99 880,899 - 96,30699/00 808,899 - 80,00000/01 801,633 - 7,26601/02 1,297,865 496,23202/03 1,095,037 -202,828*03/04 1,272,684 177,64704/05 1,941,140 668,45605/06 2,414,407 473,266 06/07 3,370,051 995,64407/08 3,489,519 119,468*Maintenance Tax Note ExpendituresOptimum Fund Balance – 4,632,747
% of Budget per Category
60%7%
13%
9%11%
InstructionSch LeaderPupil ServGen AdminMaint/Other
% of Budget per Category
52%
9%
1%
3%
6%
11%7%11%
InstructionGen AdminTransportationFood ServiceExtra CurriculMaint/DataSch LeadershipPupil Serv
Funding Sources
• Local Sources: Taxes 75.38%
• State & Fed Sources 24.62%
• Grants
• Gifts
Funding Sources
% of Tax Value by Category
53.5
18
8.5
12.5
7 0.5
Oil/GasLandResidentialBus/CommUtilitiesOther