Summing upWhat now?

What is science?

• Explanations of the material world• Based on observation and testing of theories

against nature (facts, hypotheses, laws, theories)

• Importance historically• Importance in a modern society

Why Science?w

ater

climate

food

energy

health

Why does science matter?

• Science for all– Scientific literacy important in a democracy

• Science for future scientists– Important for EU – economic growth,

competition, prosperity

What is the Nature of Science?NOS

Nature of Science (NOS) refers to the epistemology of science, science as a way of knowing, or the values and beliefs inherent to the development of scientific knowledge (Lederman, 1992).

The nature of scientific knowledge is a more suitable way to discuss this topic

General assumption that understanding NOS is important in science teaching and learning

NOS • Scientific knowledge is simultaneously reliable and

tentative. Having confidence in scientific knowledge is reasonable while realizing that such knowledge may be abandoned or modified in light of new evidence or re-conceptualization of prior evidence and knowledge.

• Although no single universal step-by-step scientific method captures the complexity of doing science, a number of shared values and perspectives characterize a scientific approach to understanding nature. Among these are a demand for naturalistic explanations supported by empirical evidence that are, at least in principle, testable against the natural world. Other shared elements include observations, rational argument, inference, skepticism, peer review and replicability of work.

NOS

• Creativity is a vital, yet personal, ingredient in the production of scientific knowledge.

• Science, by definition, is limited to naturalistic methods and explanations and, as such, is precluded from using supernatural elements in the production of scientific knowledge.

• A primary goal of science is the formation of theories and laws, which are terms with very specific meanings.

NOS• Contributions to science can be made and have

been made by people the world over.• The scientific questions asked, the observations

made, and the conclusions in science are to some extent influenced by the existing state of scientific knowledge, the social and cultural context of the researcher and the observer's experiences and expectations.

• The history of science reveals both evolutionary and revolutionary changes. With new evidence and interpretation, old ideas are replaced or supplemented by newer ones.

How does the nature of science (NOS) relate to scientific inquiry?

• Inquiry is what drives the scientific endeavor and is a process of discovery. It begins with the formation of questions that are testable, scientific investigations allow scientists to collect evidence, explanations are made based on the evidence and finally results are communicated to peers.

How is scientific inquiry related to teaching science in schools?

• Inquiry based science teaching (IBST) has it roots in curriculum development projects characteristic of the post sputnik era. The central idea is of course to use elements of inquiry in science teaching that are also present in scientific inquiry.

Science as Inquiry

• Bybee describes science as inquiry as comprising three main elements:1. Skills of scientific inquiry (what students should

be able to do)2. Knowledge about scientific inquiry (what students

should understand about the nature of scientific inquiry

3. A pedagogical approach for teaching science content

Inquiry Based Science

• Inquiry is the intentional process of diagnosing problems, critiquing experiments, and distinguishing alternatives, planning investigations, researching conjectures, searching for information, constructing models, debatng with peers and forming coherent arguments.

Linn, Davis and Bell, 2004

Inquiry Based Science is characterized by:

• Authentic and problem based learning activities where there may not be a correct answer

• A certain amount of experimental procedures, “hands-on” activities

• Self regulated learning sequences where student autonomy is emphasized

• Discursive argumentation and communication with peers (talking science)

Describing Scientific Literacy• Scientific processes, Scientific method,

Experimental approach, Problem solving, Conceiving problems, Formulating hypotheses, Designing experiments, Gathering and analyzing data, Drawing conclusions, Deriving conceptual understandings, Examining the limitations of scientific explanations, Methodological strategies, Knowledge as “temporary truths”, Practical work, Finding and exploring questions, Independent thinking, Creative inventing abilities, Hands-on activities

• From and emphasis on individual science lessons that demonstrate concepts to science lesson sequences that promote reasoning with and about concepts

• From the study of science topics that examine current scientific thinking without regard for social context to the study of science topics in social contexts

• From a view of science that emphasizes observation and experimentation to a view that stresses theory and model building and revision

Duschl

Teacher Professional Development• Cognitive dissonance is created, which disturbs the existing

equilibrium between the practices and beliefs of teachers and their experiences with the subject matter, learning and teaching.

• Discussion, reading, writing and revised thinking can lead to resolution of such dissonance when teachers are given the appropriate context, time and support

• The professional development experiences are connected to the teachers’ particular context and their own students

• A means is provided for the teachers to develop new classroom practices that are consistent with the new understandings they are developing

• As new issues and problems arise, teachers are given the support needed to understand them and put these new understandings into classroom practice

Thompson & Zeuli, 1999

The Inquiry Continuum

• Confirmation Inquiry– The question and procedure are provided, results

are known in advance.

• Structured Inquiry– The question and procedure are provided,

students generate an explanation supported by the evidence they collect

The Inquiry Continuum 2

• Guided Inquiry– The teacher provides the research question,

students design the procedure

• Open Inquiry– Students ask questions, design procedures, carry

out investigations and communicate results

5E model

• Engaging• Exploring• Explaining• Elaborating• Evaluating

Engaging (Teacher)

• Creates interest• Generates curiosity• Raises questions• Elicits responses

uncovering what students are thinking

• Explains concepts• Provides definitions and

answers• States conclusions• Provides closure• lectures

Engaging (Student)

• Asks questions such as, Why did this happen? What can I find out about this? What do I already know about this?

• Asks for the correct answer

• Seeks one solution

Explore (teacher)

• Students working together without direct instruction

• Observes and listens to student interaction

• Asks probing questions to help students

• Allows students time to think through problems

• Acts as a consultant

• Provides answers• Tells or explains how to

work on problems• Provides closure• Tells students they are

wrong• Provides facts to solve

problems• Leads step by step to

solutions

Explore (student)

• Thinks freely but within limits of the activity

• Forms new predictions and hypotheses

• Tries alternatives and discusses them with others

• Records observations and ideas

• Lets others do the thinking (passive)

• Works quietly with no involvement

• Plays around with no goal in mind

Explain (teacher)

• Encourages students to explain in own words

• Asks for justification (evidence) and clarification

• Uses students’ previous experiences as basis for explaining concepts

• Accepts explanations that have no justification

• Neglects to solicit students’ explanations

Explain (student)

• Explains possible solutions or answers to others

• Listens critically to other explanations

• Refers to previous activities

• Uses recorded observations in explanations

• Proposes explanations from thin air with no relationship to previous experiences

• Beings up irrelevant experiences and examples

• Accepts explanations without justification