summary. x-ray diagnostics of astrophysical plasmas a (highly) biased summary xdap/ cambridge, ma,...

14
SUMMARY

Upload: kayden-hickling

Post on 14-Jan-2016

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

SUMMARY

Page 2: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas

A (highly) biased summary

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

Page 3: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

Rather than a summary, identify trends and directions:

Rapid progress in 5 years since launch of Chandraand XMM-Newton

Progress now ‘problem-driven’, with priorities suggestedby specific astrophysical problems

High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy now applied to widevariety of sources and problems (‘up the ladder’)

Next up: the Fe K shell!

Page 4: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

1. Rapid Progress

Capella Chandra HETGS/ Canizares et al. 2000

• character of the field changed dramatically 1999/2000• much ‘handwringing’ unjustified in retrospect• early benchmarks in stellar astrophysics invaluable• some of the most spectacular recent Chandra/XMM results are spectroscopic-fact deserves far wider audience

Starts to look liketerrestrial lab data!

Page 5: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

2. Progress now ‘problem-driven’, with priorities suggested by specific astrophysical problems

• helps simplify the choices one faces in modeling (John R., Francis R.): volume or quality?• should start suggesting specific features to observe in specific sources, for specific effects!• examples: Time-dependent ionization balance in SNR; connection with physics of explosion and NS birth event (Martin L., Cas A) Fe XVII 15.01/15.26 A ratio; radiative transfer? O innershell absorption spectrum: AGN warm absorbers; ISM/IGM?

Page 6: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

Page 7: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

3. High-resolution X-ray spectroscopy now applied to wide variety of sources and problems (‘up the ladder’)

• discrete emission from GRB afterglows

GRB 011211Reeves et al., 2002

Swift goes today!(but careful with CCD spectroscopy! Only unblended unique signatureof CX-XPN is S XVI RRC!! Cf. Liedahl 1993)

Page 8: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

• X-ray absorption signature of astrophysical dust/ X-ray spectroscopy of neutrals, molecules

Cf. Julia L’s presentation on XAFS spectroscopy;

Jon Woo et al., 1998

Page 9: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

• Also, physics of electron impact X-ray fluorescencesources used for calibration…the Chemical Shift, etc….

Mg K with LETGS(m=5), HETGS/MEG(m=3),HETGS/HEG(m=2) (cf. Dan Dewey’s HETGS page at MIT)

Page 10: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

• Absorption line spectroscopy: ISM, IGM

Cf. Yangsen Y’s, Daniel W.’s poster and talk: Absorption by highly ionized species in the Galaxyand its halo (?). Prospects for detection of emission?

McCammon et al. 2002

Page 11: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

• Absorption line spectroscopy: ISM, IGM

Radiative transfer effects!

Scattering of the unresolved XRB off He-like O resonance may contribute major fraction to IGM emission!

(Also (different context): Duane L’s talk on efficiencyof Resonant Auger Destruction- touches on several aspects of the meeting topic)

Page 12: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

Amazingly, this subject now has connections with Heliospheric physics!! CE emission from highly ionized Oin comets, geocorona: very local diffuse foreground!Cf. Talk by Dennis B., paper by Brad W. et al. 2004

It pays to read each other’s papers!

The innovative aspect of our work deserves FAR widerfamiliarity among astronomers; strategically importantto spread these stories (Constellation X, XEUS, …) (*)

(*) also: Lab Astrophysics

Page 13: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

4. Next Up: Fe K Band!!

• Seven talks on this topic alone at the meeting; • Representative/suggestive spectra already taken

at Astro-E2 XRS resolution (EBIT/LLNL):• Next year at this time we will be looking at similar

spectra from cosmic sources!

If the spectroscopy with the diffraction grating Spectrometers on Chandra and XMM-Newton is any guide: we will probably figure out ‘how to diagonalize the (spectroscopic) matrix’ (ClaudeCanizares, summarizing the first ASCA conference inTokyo), making X-ray spectroscopy of cosmic sourceseven more indispensable to astrophysics

Page 14: SUMMARY. X-ray Diagnostics of Astrophysical Plasmas A (highly) biased summary XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

XDAP/ Cambridge, MA, November 2004

Excellent meeting- apologies to everyone whosework I did not mention;

many thanks to the organizers the sponsors, and Randall in particular!