summary of projects in the financially constrained element...appendix b: summary of projects in the...
TRANSCRIPT
APPENDIX B Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element
October 2018
Visualize 2045 is developed by the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB), the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for metropolitan Washington. It is responsible for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in the metropolitan area. Members of the TPB include representatives of the transportation agencies of the states of Maryland and Virginia and the District of Columbia, 24 local governments, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Maryland and Virginia General Assemblies, and nonvoting members from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and federal agencies. The TPB is staffed by the Department of Transportation Planning at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG).
CREDITS Editor: Andrew Austin, Department of Transportation Planning (DTP) Contributing Editors: John Swanson, DTP Abigail Zenner, DTP
ACCOMMODATIONS POLICY Alternative formats of this document are available upon request. Visit www.mwcog.org/accommodations or call (202) 962-3300 or (202) 962-3213 (TDD).
TITLE VI NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination in all programs and activities. For more information, to file a Title VI related complaint, or to obtain information in another language, visit www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination or call (202) 962-3300.
El Consejo de Gobiernos del Área Metropolitana de Washington (COG) cumple con el Título VI de la Ley sobre los Derechos Civiles de 1964 y otras leyes y reglamentos en todos sus programas y actividades. Para obtener más información, someter un pleito relacionado al Título VI, u obtener información en otro idioma, visite www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination o llame al (202) 962-3300.
Copyright © 2018 by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS IN THE FINANCIALLY- CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF THE VISUALIZE 2045 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION October 17, 2018
ABOUT VISUALIZE 2045 & THE TPB Visualize 2045 is the federally required long-range transportation plan for the National Capital Region. It identifies and analyzes all regionally significant transportation investments planned through 2045 to help decision makers and the public “visualize” the region’s future.
TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1
PROJECT PROFILES 2
PROJECT SUBMISSIONS, THE RTPP, AND FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS 33
PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORMS 37
ALL PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF VISUALIZE 2045 106
TECHNICAL INPUTS SOLICITATION SUBMISSION GUIDE 172
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 1
INTRODUCTION
The financially constrained element of Visualize 2045 contains more than 600 projects. These projects cover all modes, ranging from multi-billion-dollar highway and transit projects to local bridge replacements to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Of these projects, the 123 listed and mapped in Chapter 5 of the plan are significant enough in scope or cost to be considered a “major” project on the regional scale.
At the outset of the development of Visualize 2045, the region’s transportation agencies submitted 60 new projects and made updates to more than 300 projects already included in the long-range plan – either changing completion dates, scopes, or the costs of projects. Fifteen of those new or updated projects are included in the lists and maps of major projects and have been highlighted in the Project Profiles on pages 3–32 of this document and Tables 1 and 2 (pages 35 and 36) that were prepared for public comment at the beginning of the development of Visualize 2045.
The information in this document is presented as released for public comment in December 2017 and updated for the final public comment period from September 7 – October 7, 2018. There are four sections in this appendix: Project Profiles; Table 1 - and Table 2; detailed Project Submission Forms; and a complete listing of projects included in the financially constrained element of Visualize 2045.
The Project Profiles provide easy-to-read project descriptions and maps with a focus on how each project supports the goals outlined in the TPB’s Regional Transportation Priorities Plan (RTPP) and the federal planning factors set forth in the FAST Act. Tables 1 and 2 provide visual comparisons of how the implementing agencies believe that these 15 new and updated projects support the RTPP and the federal planning factors. The Project Submission Forms provide greater detail about these projects, as provided by the implementing agencies. The complete listing of projects in the constrained element of Visualize 2045 is divided up by the submitting agencies and then by project or facility type. Each of those groups are also sorted as to whether the project expands the capacity of our region’s transportation system, provides maintenance and a state of good repair, or is an ongoing operational program. The constrained element ID (CEID) for each project listed provides a link to the full project description.
PROJECT PROFILES
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 2
DC BICYCLE LANES Various Locations Districtwide
Visualize2045.org
MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………6 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2018, 2023
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$28 million
Submitting Agency………………………………District DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….multiple
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description DDOT is proposing adding six new segments to its existing bicycle path network. The following projects will remove one or more traffic lanes to allow for separated bicycle lanes.
• Pennsylvania Ave. SE from 2nd St./Independence Ave.to Barney Circle (1.3 miles)
• 17th St. NW from New Hampshire Ave. to K St. (<1 mile)• K St. from 7th St. NW to 1st St. NE (<1 mile)• K St. from 1st St. NE to Florida Ave. NE (<1 mile)• Irving St. from Warder St. NW to Michigan Ave. NE (1 mile)• New York Ave. NE from Florida Ave. to Bladensburg Rd.
(2.3 miles)
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Move DC
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Forms for more information about these projects.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 3
DC BIKE LANES
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
Making bicycling safer and easier represents an expansion of transportation options (Goal 1). This will be advanced by implementing six bike-lane projects in the District. These projects are particularly supportive of the Priorities Plan’s call for improved non-motorized circulation within Activity Centers (Goal 2) to make bicycle travel more efficient and safer (Goals 3 and 4). The project further supports emissions reductions (Goal 5).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel & Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☐ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☐ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.tion.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 12, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 4
I-270 MANAGED LANESFrom I-495, Capital Beltway to I-70/US 40
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………34 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2020-2025*
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….1186
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description The I-270 component of MDOT’s “Traffic Relief Plan” project will add two new managed lanes in each direction along I-270 between the Capital Beltway (I-495) and I-70/US 40.
*Actual completion year will depend on awarded contract.For air quality conformity modeling purposes, the completiondate is presumed to be 2025.
Existing Support for this Project This project has undergone review at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter
☒ MDOT/SHA Traffic Relief Plan
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 5
I-270 MANAGED LANES
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan called upon the region to use tolling and pricing mechanisms to manage road congestion and raise revenue. This project adds a key corridor to the region’s express lane network and will expand transportation choices (Goal 1) by adding lanes that will be dynamically managed to ensure free-flowing travel for drivers and express bus services. The 34-mile project connects numerous Activity Centers, which are the region’s primary engines for economic growth and opportunity (Goal 2).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel & Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☒Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☒ Traffic operational improvements☒ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☒ Other congestion management strategies☐ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis
September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 6
I-495 MANAGED LANESFrom the American Legion Bridge to the Woodrow Wilson Bridge
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………22 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2020-2025*
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4.3 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….1182, 3281
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description The I-495 component of MDOT’s “Traffic Relief Plan” project will add two new managed lanes in each direction along the Capital Beltway between the Virginia end of the American Legion Bridge to the Maryland end of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge.
*Actual completion year will depend on awarded contract. Forair quality conformity modeling purposes, the completion dateis presumed to be 2025.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter
☒ 2009 Prince George’s County Master Plan ofTransportation (MPO
☒ 1990 Heights Sector Plan
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 7
I-495 MANAGED LANES
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
New managed lanes on the entire 42-mile length of Maryland’s Capital Beltway will dramatically expand transportation choices (Goal 1) in the region by adding dynamically managed lanes to ensure free-flowing travel for drivers and for express bus services. Along with the I-270 Managed Lanes, this project significantly expands the region’s network of recent and forthcoming priced-lane projects. The project will connect numerous Activity Centers (Goal 2), the region’s focal points for economic growth.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☒Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☒ Traffic operational improvements☒ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☒ Other congestion management strategies☐ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis
September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 8
US 301 WIDENING From the Governor Harry Nice Bridge to US 50/I-595
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………48 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2045
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$4.6 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CE ID…………………………………………….1004
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description Widen Crain Highway, US 301 from 4 to 6 lanes between the Governor Harry Nice Bridge at the Potomac River to the John Hanson Highway, US 50/I-595.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Pending
See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 9
US 301 WIDENING
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
This 48-mile road widening project will expand transportation options for drivers, carpoolers and transit riders (Goal 1). The project will connect three Activity Centers (Bowie, Waldorf, and La Plata) (Goal 2) and will enhance freight movement (Goal 6).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☐ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 5, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 10
MD 201 WIDENING From I-495, Capital Beltway to US 1 North of Muirkirk Road
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………4.5 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2045
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$1 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☐ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID………………………………………….…….1204
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will widen MD 201 to four lanes between north of I-495, Capital Beltway to Ammendale Way. It will also extend theMaryland Route 201 designation from its current end-point atPowder Mill Road to continue along Edmonston Road and OldBaltimore Pike. Additionally, it will construct a four-laneextension from Muirkirk Road to US 1. Bicycle and pedestrianaccess will be considered as part of this project.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ 2017 Prince George’s County Priority Letter
☒ 2009 Prince George’s County Master Plan ofTransportation
☒ 1993 Subregion I Sector Plan
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 11
MD 201 WIDENING
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
This four-mile road widening of Edmonston Road/Old Baltimore Pike will expand travel options (Goal 1) by enhancing the facility for drivers and buses, while expanding options for walking and biking. It will connect the Greenbelt Activity Center to the Konterra Activity Center (Goal 2) and will promote local freight movement (Goal 6).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 14, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 12
MD 97 RECONSTRUCTION From 16th Street to Forest Glen Road
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………<1 Mile
Anticipated Completion………………………...2025
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$52 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Maryland DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☐ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CLRP ID…………………………………………….2618
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will reconstruct and widen MD 97, Georgia Avenue from six or seven lanes to seven or eight lanes on either side of I-495, Capital Beltway between 16th Street and Forest Glen Road.Sidewalks and accommodations for bicycles will be included whereappropriate.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Montgomery County 2017 Transportation Priority Letter
See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 13
MD 97 WIDENING
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
Motivated by safety considerations (Goal 3), this project will widen approximately one mile of this heavily trafficked portion of Georgia Avenue crossing under the Beltway. It will provide pedestrian accommodations where feasible to promote access for all transportation modes (Goal 1), promote better circulation in the Silver Spring Activity Center (Goal 2), and facilitate local goods movement (Goal 6).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 14
RANDOLPH ROAD BRT From US 29 to MD 355
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………10 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2040
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$102 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….3662
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on Randolph Road between the White Flint Metro Station to US 29, Columbia Pike. The buses will run in mixed-traffic.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 15
Randolph Road BRT
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 16
NORTH BETHESDA BRT Montgomery Mall Transit Center to White Flint Metrorail Station
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………3.5 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2035
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$115 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….3663
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on Rock Spring Drive and Old Georgetown Road connecting the White Flint Metro Station with the Montgomery Mall Transit Center and the Rock Spring office park area. The buses will run on a dedicated transitway.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 17
North Bethesda BRT
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).
. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 18
MD 355 BRT From Bethesda to Clarksburg
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………22 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2045
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$1.08 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID………………………………………………….3424
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on MD 355 between Bethesda and Clarksburg. The buses will run in a combination of dedicated transitway and mixed traffic.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ MD 355 BRT Corridor Planning Study
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 19
MD 355 BRT
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).
. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 20
MD 650 BRT From Colesville Park-and-Ride to Eastern Avenue
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………8.4 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2045
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$285 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID………………………………………………….3672
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) route on MD 650 between the Colesville Park-and-Ride lot and Eastern Avenue. The buses will run in a combination of dedicated transitway and mixed traffic.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ White Oak and Silver Spring Master Plans
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 21
MD 650 BRT
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).
. Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.☐ Not yet Available – Agencies have untilMarch 2, 2018 to complete the requiredCongestion Management Documentation.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on January 15, 2018..
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
December 14, 2017-January 13, 2018 Comment on the projects before they are included in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis
September 13-October 13, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B :Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 22
VEIRS MILL ROAD BRT From MD 355, Rockville Pike to MD 97, Georgia Avenue
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………6 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2030
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$80 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Montgomery County
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….3103
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on Veirs Mill Road between the Rockville and Wheaton Metrorail stations. The project includes constructing queue jumps and installing transit signal priority at key intersections. The project also adds new transit service using articulated BRT vehicles, BRT stations with level boarding and off-board fare collection, and pedestrian and bike improvements.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Corridor Study Report, October 2017
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 23
VEIRS MILL ROAD BRT
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan specifically called for cost-effective transit alternatives, like bus rapid transit (BRT), that approach the speed, frequency and reliability of heavy rail but at a fraction of the cost. This project is a component of a wider BRT network planned for Montgomery County that will expand travel options (Goal 1), connect Activity Centers (Goal 2), maximize the use of existing infrastructure without adding new capacity (Goal 4), and reduce emissions (Goal 5).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 24
I-495 HOT LANESFrom Old Dominion Drive to the American Legion Bridge
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGE VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………2 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2025
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$500 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID……………………………………………..….2069
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description The I-495 HOT Lanes project has been included in the long-range transportation plan since 2005, and improvements between Old Dominion Drive and the Springfield Interchange were completed in 2012. The existing project includes extension of two HOT lanes in each direction from Old Dominion Drive to George Washington Parkway by 2025, and extension of one HOT Lane in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2030. This proposed change would extend two HOT lanes in each direction from the George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2025. As a result of the collaboration between VDOT and MDOT, Maryland’s toll lanes project, which includes improving the capacity of the American Legion Bridge, will connect to an equivalent managed lane system at the Virginia state line.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Pending
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 25
I-495 HOT LANES
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR CHANGE
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
This two-mile link connecting Virginia’s existing Capital Beltway HOT lanes and the forthcoming managed lanes on Maryland’s Capital Beltway will help to create a seamless regional network of express toll lanes, which was a key objective of the TPB’s Priorities Plan. The project will expand travel options in the region (Goal 1) for vehicles and for express bus services.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☒ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☒ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 26
I-95 SB AUXILIARY LANEFrom VA 123 to VA 294
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………1.5 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2028
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$27.5 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………….3664
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will add one auxiliary lane to southbound I-95 between the Route 123 on-ramp and the Route 294 exit ramp.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Pending
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 27
I-95 SB AUXILIARY LANE
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
Enhancing safety (Goal 3) is the primary motivation for the addition of a southbound auxiliary lane on I-95 in Prince William County. The project will expand travel options (Goal 1) for drivers and bus riders, support freight movement (Goal 6), and enhance a connection to Woodbridge, which is an Activity Center (Goal 2).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☐ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☐ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☐ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☒ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☐ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☐ Protect and Enhance the Environment☐ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☐ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☐ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☐ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 28
US 15 WIDENING From Battlefield Parkway to VA 661 Montresor Road
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………3.6 Miles
Anticipated Completion………………………...2025
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$33 million
Submitting Agency………………………………Virginia DOT
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
CEID…………………………………………..…….3608
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description This project will widen US Route 15, James Madison Highway from two to four lanes between the northern interchange with Battlefield Parkway and VA 661, Montresor Road.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Pending
See official CLRP Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 29
US 15 WIDENING
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The James Madison Highway widening north of Leesburg will accommodate a variety of users (Goal 1) including drivers, bus riders, and bicyclists. The project will enhance safety (Goal 3) and support freight movement (Goal 6).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☒ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☐ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☐ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☐ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☐ Connects two or more Activity Centers☐ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☐ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☐ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☒ Long-haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☐ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☒ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☐Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies
See the Congestion Management Documentation form for more information.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 13, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 30
METRORAIL CAPACITY 8-Car Trains and Core Station Improvements
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION VISUALIZE 2045
Basic Project Information
Project Length……………………………………Entire System
Anticipated Completion………………………...2045
Estimated Cost of Construction……………….$5.4 billion
Submitting Agency………………………………WMATA
Anticipated Funding Sources…………………………………….
☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
FINAL COMMENT PERIOD September 7 – October 7, 2018 See reverse for details, or visit www.mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Project Description
This project will implement all 8-car trains running on the system during peak periods. Capacity improvements will be made to stations in the core to accommodate the trains. Supporting power infrastructure will be added to support the expansion.
Existing Support for this Project This project has been reviewed at the local, state, and/or sub-regional levels and is included in the following approved plans:
☒ Momentum
See official Visualize 2045 Project Description Form for more information about this project.
See reverse side for more information about how this project advances regional goals and addresses certain federal planning requirements.
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
HIGHWAY TRANSIT BICYCLE OR PEDESTRIAN
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 31
METRORAIL CAPACITY
Visualize2045.org
PROPOSED MAJOR ADDITION
VISUALIZE 2045
How this project supports or advances goals in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan
The Priorities Plan urged the region to expand capacity on the existing transit system, and eight-car trains and core capacity improvements for Metrorail were among the few projects that the plan specifically identified. This project will help fulfill Metro’s pivotal role in providing transportation options in our region (Goal 1). It will help ensure Activity Centers are connected, the system is safe and maintained (Goal 3), existing infrastructure is effectively used (Goal 4), and our environment is protected (Goal 5).
Goal 1: Provide a Range of Transportation Options Provides, enhances, supports, or promotes the following travel mode options: ☐ Single Driver (SOV) ☐ Carpool/HOV ☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail☐ Streetcar/Light Rail ☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter Bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other☒ Improves accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes, and/or limited English proficiency)
Goal 2: Promote Dynamic Activity Centers ☒ Begins or ends in an Activity Center☒ Connects two or more Activity Centers☒ Promotes non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers
Goal 3: Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety ☒ Contributes to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety
Goal 4: Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety ☒ Reduces travel time on highways and/or transit without building new capacity(e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)☒ Enhances safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists
Goal 5: Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment Expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of: ☒ Criteria Pollutants (NOx, VOCs, PM2.5) ☒ Greenhouse Gases
Goal 6: Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce Enhances, supports, or promotes the following freight carrier modes: ☐ Long-haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirEnhances, supports, or promotes the following passenger carrier modes:☐ Air ☐ Amtrak Intercity Passenger Rail ☐ Intercity Bus
Addressing Federal Planning Factors This project addresses the following federal planning factors designed to guide development of Visualize 2045:
☒ Support Economic Vitality☒ Increase Safety for All Users☒ Support Homeland and Personal Security☒ Increase Accessibility and Mobility of Peopleand/or Freight☒ Protect and Enhance the Environment☒ Enhance Integration and Connectivity☒ Promote Efficient System Management andOperation☒ Emphasize System Preservation☐ Improve Resiliency or Mitigate Stormwater☒ Enhance Travel and Tourism
Consideration of Alternatives to Adding SOV Capacity The agency or agencies submitting this project considered the following congestion-mitigation measures before proposing to significantly increase capacity for single-occupant vehicles (SOVs):
☐Transportation demand managementmeasures (including growth management andcongestion pricing)☐ Traffic operational improvements☐ Public transportation improvements☒Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)technologies☐ Other congestion management strategies☒ Not applicable – This project does not increaseSOV capacity or is exempt from consideration ofalternatives.
Information about how projects advance regional goals and address federal planning requirements is self-reported by the agencies submitting projects for inclusion in Visualize 2045.
The information on this form was last updated on December 8, 2017.
Comment on this project or on Visualize 2045
September 7-October 7, 2018 Comment on projects and any other aspect of the draft Visualize 2045 plan before final TPB adoption.
Visualize2045.org | [email protected] | (202) 962-3262 777 North Capitol St. NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20002
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 32
PROJECT SUBMISSIONS, THE RTPP, AND FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 33
Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Promote a Strong Regional Economy, Including a Healthy Regional Core and Dynamic Activity Centers
Ensure Adequate System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety of the Transportation System
Enhance Environmental Quality, and Protect Natural and Cultural Resources
Support Inter-Regional and International Travel and Commerce
• Pleaseidentifyalltravelmodeoptionsthatthisprojectprovides,enhances,supports,orpromotes.• Doesthisprojectimproveaccessibilityforhistoricallytransportation-disadvantagedindividuals(i.e.,
personswithdisabilities,low-incomes,and/orlimitedEnglishproficiency?
TheCLRPProjectDescriptionformincludesasetofquestionsundertheRegionalPolicyFrameworksection.ThesequestionsareintendedtoexaminehowprojectssupportthegoalssetforthintheRegionalTransportationPrioritiesPlan(RTPP).ThesixRTPPgoalsaredescribedhereandarematchedupwiththecorrespondingquestionsfromtheCLRPProjectDescriptionform.TheresponsesprovidedbythesubmittingagenciesforallnewprojectsproposedforamendmenttotheCLRPthisyearhavebeensummarizedintheattachedtable,alongwiththeirresponsesastohowtheprojectssupportthefederalplanningfactorsprescribedunderMAP-21.
Goal 1
Goal 2
• DoesthisprojectbeginorendinanActivityCenter?• DoesthisprojectconnecttwoormoreActivityCenters?• Doesthisprojectpromotenon-autotravelwithinoneormoreActivityCenters?
• Doesthisprojectcontributetoenhancedsystemmaintenance,preservation,orsafety?
• Doesthisprojectreducetraveltimeonhighwaysand/ortransitwithoutbuildingnewcapacity(e.g.,ITS,busprioritytreatments,etc.)?
• Doesthisprojectenhancesafetyformotorists,transitusers,pedestrians,and/orbicyclists?
• Isthisprojectexpectedtocontributetoreductionsinemissionsofcriteriapollutants?• Isthisprojectexpectedtocontributetoreductionsinemissionsofgreenhousegases?
• Pleaseidentifyallfreightcarriermodesthatthisprojectenhances,supports,orpromotes.• Pleaseidentifyallpassengercarriermodesthatthisprojectenhances,supports,orpromotes.
Goal 3
Goal 4
Goal 5
Goal 6
Assessing CLRP Project Submissions against the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan and FAST Act
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
Question
22
23
24
25
26
27
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 34
SOVHOV
MetroRail
Commuter Rail
Streetcar/Lt. R
ail
BRTExp. B
us
Metrobus
Local Bus
OtherBicycling
WalkingDisa
dvantaged
GroupsBegin/End in AC
Connect ACs
Non-Auto w/in AC
Maintenance
Reduce Time
w/o Capacity
Enhance Safety
Criteria
Pollutants
Greenhouse Gases
Long Haul Truck
Local Delive
ry
Freight Rail
Freight Air
Air Passe
nger
AmtrakIntercity
Bus
MAJOR PROJECTS*
* Major projects are defined as changes to interstates, major arterials, and expressways or freeways with at-grade intersections, as well as dedicated transit facilities.
Estimated Cost
Projected Completion
TABLE 1VISUALIZE 2045 TECHNICAL INPUTS AND THE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES PLAN GOALS
This matrix provides a visual summary of the responses provided by the relevant implementing agencies as to how their proposed projects support the goals identified in the RTPP.
1. Dedicated Bike Lanes
2. I-270 Toll Lanes $350 million
2018, 2023
2030
5. MD 201
6.MD 97
7. Randolph Road BRT
8.North Bethesda BRT
$1 billion
$52 million
2045
2025
9. MD 355 BRT
10. Veirs Mill Road BRT
11. I-495 HOT Lanes (North)
12. I-95 Southbound
$1.08 billion
$80 million
$500 million
$33 million
2045
2030
2025
2025
$28 million
$102 million
$115 million
2040
2035
3. I-95/I-495 Toll Lanes
4. US 301
$4.3 billion
$4.6 billion
2025
2045
13. US 15 $33 million 2025
Goal 1
Goal 2Goal 3
Goal 4Goal 5
Goal 6
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 35
Economic Vitality
SafetyHomeland Security
Accessibilit
y/Mobility P
eople
Accessibilit
y/Mobility F
reight
Environment
Integration/Connectivi
ty
Management & Operatio
n
Preservatio
n
MAJOR PROJECTS*
* Major projects are defined as changes to interstates, major arterials, and expressways or freeways with at-grade intersections, as well as dedicated transit facilities.
Estimated Cost
Projected Completion
Federal Planning Factors
• Support the economic vitality of the metropolitanarea, especially by enabling global competitiveness,productivity,andefficienc .
• Increase the safety of the transportation systemfor all motorized and non-motorized users.
• Increase the ability of the transportation system tosupport homeland security and to safeguard the personalsecurity of all motorized and non-motorized users.
• Increase accessibility and mobility of people.• Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.• Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy
conservation, improve the quality of life, and promoteconsistency between transportation improvements andState and local planned growth and economicdevelopment patterns.
• Enhance the integration and connectivity of thetransportation system, across and between modes,for people and freight.
• Promoteefficien systemmanagement and operation.• Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
TABLE 2VISUALIZE 2045 PROJECT SUBMISSIONSAND THE FEDERAL PLANNING FACTORS
This matrix provides a visual summary of the responses provided by the relevant implementing agencies as to how their proposed projects support the planning factors set forth in the FAST Act
1. Dedicated Bike Lanes
2. I-270 Toll Lanes
5. MD 201
6. MD 97
7. Randolph Road BRT
8.North Bethesda BRT
9. MD 355 BRT
10. Veirs Mill Road BRT
11. I-495 HOT Lanes (North)
12. I-95
3. I-495 Toll Lanes
4. US 301
13. US 15
$3.4 billion
2018, 2023
2030
$1 billion
$52 million
2045
2025
$1.08 billion
$500 million
$27.5 million
2045
2030
2025
2025
$28 million
$102 million
$115 million
2040
2035
$4.2 billion
$4.6 billion
2025
2045
$33 million 2025
$80 million
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 36
PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORMS
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 37
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36511. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: 17th Street NW Protected Bike LanePrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Install two-way protected bike lane on 17th Street NW. This would replace the existing southbound-only conventional bike lane currently in place between New Hampshire Avenue NW and Massachusetts Avenue NW, and continue south to K Street NW. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility on a busy corridor for bicycling, and to provide an alternative facility to the congested 15th Street NW protected bike lane.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2018
12. Project Manager: Darren Buck
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 0.84 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $150 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
17th St. NW New Hampshire Ave. NW K St. NW
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 38
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 39
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 40
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36531. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: Irving Street NE/NW Protected Bike LanePrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Install protected bike lanes on Irving Street NE/NW. This bikeway would connect through McMillan-Old Soldier’s Home to Brookland. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility across a large crosstown area without any safe facilities for bicycling.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2018
12. Project Manager: Darren Buck
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 1 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $250 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
Irving St. NE/NW Warder St. NW Michigan Ave. NE
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 41
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 42
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 43
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36521. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: K Street NW BikewayPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Install bike lanes (protected in places) along K Street NW/NE. This bikeway would connect Downtown, NoMa, and the Mt Vernon Triangle. This project is intended to increase bicycle accessibility on a busy corridor for bicycling.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2018
12. Project Manager: Darren Buck
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: <1 mile
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $150 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
K St. NW 1st St. NE
7th St. NW
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 44
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 45
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 46
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36461. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: K Street NE Road Diet with Bike LanesPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Road diet to remove peak hour parking restrictions and provide full time parking along project limits. Peak hour restrictions are directional, 3 to 2 lane. Bicycle lanes will be provided between 1st St NE and 6th St NE. Reduction of one eastbound portal under rail (between 1st and 2nd Sts) to a provide two-way cycle track is currently under consideration with some opposition.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2018
12. Project Manager: Darren Buck
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: <1 mile
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $30 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
K St. NE 1st St. NE
Florida Ave. NE
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 47
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 48
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 49
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36551. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: New York Avenue Streetscape & Trail ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: The New York Avenue Streetscape and Trail Project is a 30% design plan to install streetscape improvements including lighting, new sidewalk connections, landscaping, traffic signals and signage and a raised cycletrack along New York Avenue NE from Florida Avenue NE to Bladensburg Road NE.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2023
12. Project Manager: Katherine Youngbluth
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL: www.newyorkavenuestudy.com
15. Total Miles: 2.3 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $27,200 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
New York Ave. NE Florida Ave. NE Bladensburg Ave. NE
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 50
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☐ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☒ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 51
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 52
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36551. Submitting Agency: DDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☒ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: Pennsylvania Avenue SEPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: This project will connect the Anacostia River Trail with bicycle lanes through Capitol Hill to the downtown core. In addition, it will provide cyclist access to bike lanes on Pennsylvania Ave west of the Capitol, and to the Metropolitan Branch Trail. It will reduce off-peak lane capacity from 6 to 4 lanes between 2nd and 14th Streets. During peak hours the existing 6 lanes will be utilized. Between 14th Street and Barney Circle, rush hour lane capacity will be reduced from 8 lanes to 6 lanes; the 6 lane off-peak capacity would be unchanged.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2018
12. Project Manager: Mike Goodno
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 1.3 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $250 cost estimate as of 11/9/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals
Pennsylvania Avenue SE 2nd Street, Independence Avenue Barney Circle
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 53
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☒ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 54
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☐ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Mark Rawlings
37. Created On: 11/17/2017
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 55
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information1. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: I-270 CorridorPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: I-270 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, between I-495and I-70/US 40. Does not include I-270 Innovative Congestion Management improvements (CLRP3564).
11. Projected Completion Year: 2020-2025
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/
15. Total Miles: 34 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $3,400,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
I 270 I 495 Capital Beltway I 70 /US 40
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 56
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 57
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 5/8/2006
38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker
39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 58
Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan
1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the
following in-place congestion management strategies:
a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed
ride home, employer programs)
b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity
c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts
d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes
e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems
f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location
g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location
h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center
i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols
j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)
k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)
2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full
or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the
project.
a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion
pricing
Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-
270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with
Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these
corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including
the Purple Line light rail construction.
b. Traffic operational improvements
MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address
localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting
and signing improvements.
c. Public transportation improvements
Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in
these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service
improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.
d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies
MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,
multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive
and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center
and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies
in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident
management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,
and emergency response.
e. Other congestion management strategies
MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 59
which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.
f. Combinations of the above strategies
3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed
increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.
I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that
the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and
periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to
support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional
roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,
will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in
the added lanes.
4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed
highway project.
MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the
P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular
trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.
Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at
this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.
5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management
strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness
of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.
MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3
procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are
anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery
approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of
P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety
and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor
compliance with these commitments.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 60
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 11821. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: I-95/I-495 Corridor (South and East)Prefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: I-95/I-495 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, betweenBaltimore Washington Parkway and Virginia State line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge).
11. Projected Completion Year: 2020-2025
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/
15. Total Miles: 22 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $2,200,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
I 495 Baltimore-Washington Parkway VA State Line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge)
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 61
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 62
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 5/8/2006
38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker
39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 63
Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan
1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the
following in-place congestion management strategies:
a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed
ride home, employer programs)
b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity
c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts
d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes
e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems
f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location
g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location
h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center
i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols
j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)
k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)
2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full
or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the
project.
a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion
pricing
Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-
270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with
Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these
corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including
the Purple Line light rail construction.
b. Traffic operational improvements
MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address
localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting
and signing improvements.
c. Public transportation improvements
Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in
these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service
improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.
d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies
MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,
multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive
and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center
and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies
in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident
management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,
and emergency response.
e. Other congestion management strategies
MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 64
which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.
f. Combinations of the above strategies
3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed
increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.
I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that
the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and
periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to
support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional
roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,
will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in
the added lanes.
4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed
highway project.
MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the
P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular
trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.
Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at
this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.
5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management
strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness
of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.
MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3
procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are
anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery
approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of
P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety
and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor
compliance with these commitments.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 65
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 32811. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: I-95/I-495 Corridor (North and West)Prefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: I-95/I-495 component of Traffic Relief Plan, to include two managed lanes in each direction, betweenthe Virginia State line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge) and Baltimore Washington Parkway.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2025
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL: http://www.mdtrafficreliefp3.com/
15. Total Miles: 20 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $2,092,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☐ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
I 495 VA State Line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge) Baltimore-Washington Parkway
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 66
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 67
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☒ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 5/8/2006
38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker
39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 68
Project: MDOT I-495 and I-270 Traffic Relief Plan
1. Indicate whether the proposed project's location is subject to or benefits significantly from any of the
following in-place congestion management strategies:
a) X Metropolitan Washington Commuter Connections program (ridesharing, telecommuting, guaranteed
ride home, employer programs)
b) X A Transportation Management Association is in the vicinity
c) X Channelized or grade-separated intersection(s) or roundabouts
d) X Reversible, turning, acceleration/deceleration, or bypass lanes
e) X High occupancy vehicle facilities or systems
f) X Transit stop (rail or bus) within a 1/2 mile radius of the project location
g) X Park-and-ride lot within a one-mile radius of the project location
h) X Real-time surveillance/traffic device controlled by a traffic operations center
i) X Motorist assistance/hazard clearance patrols
j) X Interconnected/coordinated traffic signal system (along intersecting arterials)
k) _ Other in-place congestion management strategy or strategies (briefly describe below:)
2. List and briefly describe how the following categories of (additional) strategies were considered as full
or partial alternatives to single-occupant vehicle capacity expansion in the study or proposal for the
project.
a. Transportation demand management measures, including growth management and congestion
pricing
Several transportation demand management measures are currently in place in the I-495 and I-
270 corridors. Each local jurisdiction maintains growth management strategies in accordance with
Maryland law. In addition to the congestion management strategies currently in place in these
corridors (see Question 1 above), public transportation improvements are also underway including
the Purple Line light rail construction.
b. Traffic operational improvements
MDOT SHA has evaluated numerous operational improvements in these corridors to address
localized traffic and safety issues. These include extension of merge areas, auxiliary lanes, lighting
and signing improvements.
c. Public transportation improvements
Several public transportation improvements have been implemented and are currently underway in
these corridors, including upgrades to MARC commuter rail service, local and commuter bus service
improvements, and the ongoing implementation of the Purple Line light rail.
d. Intelligent Transportation Systems technologies
MDOT SHA’s Coordinated Highways Action Response Team (CHART) is a multi-jurisdictional,
multidisciplinary ITS program that supports freeways throughout Maryland. The comprehensive
and advanced traffic management system includes a state of the art command and control center
and satellite operations centers that function 24 hours-a-day, seven days a week. ITS technologies
in place throughout these corridors include real-time traffic surveillance, traffic incident
management, work zone management, traveler information services, road weather information,
and emergency response.
e. Other congestion management strategies
MDOT continues to support a comprehensive range of transportation strategies in these corridorsAppendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 69
which have the highest levels of traffic demand in the State.
f. Combinations of the above strategies
3. Could congestion management alternatives fully eliminate or partially offset the need for the proposed
increase in single-occupant vehicle capacity? Explain why or why not.
I-495 and I-270 experience some of the worst congestion in the State. The demand is so great that
the facilities are congested not just during traditional rush hours, but for up to 10 hours daily and
periodically during weekends. Both state and local governments have developed and continue to
support a broad range of congestion management strategies in the project area; however, additional
roadway capacity is needed to provide congestion relief. Managed lanes, as proposed in this project,
will provide travelers with a reliable option for a faster trip, using pricing to manage the congestion in
the added lanes.
4. Describe all congestion management strategies that are going to be incorporated into the proposed
highway project.
MDOT expects to deliver these projects through public-private-partnerships (P3). Project goals of the
P3 agreements will be to provide solutions to reduce delay and improve predictability for vehicular
trips, provide improvements faster to the users, and encourage innovation to minimize impacts.
Specific elements of the project design, including congestion management strategies are not known at
this time; however, this document will be updates once the contracts are awarded.
5. Describe the proposed funding and implementation schedule for the congestion management
strategies to be incorporated into the proposed highway project. Also describe how the effectiveness
of strategies implemented will be monitored and assessed after implementation.
MDOT plans to initiate environmental review and seek Board of Public Works concurrence on the P3
procurement process in 2018. Selection of private partner(s) and environmental approvals are
anticipated in 2020, with construction beginning soon thereafter. MDOT expects that P3 delivery
approach will allow the projects to be implemented with no net State contribution over the totality of
P3 agreements. Once operational, the developer will be responsible for maintaining operations, safety
and maintenance conditions that will be established in the contract documents. MDOT will monitor
compliance with these commitments.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 70
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 10041. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency: MDOT/Maryland Transit Administration
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☒ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: US 301 South Corridor Transportation StudyPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Multi-modal corridor study to consider highway/transit improvements from the Potomac River to Mount Oak Road (US 50/US 301 interchange). Includes preparing appropriate environmental approvals for the recommended alternates. Project planning study and right-of-way preservation along US 301, from south of La Plata to Mount Oak Road.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2045
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 48 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $4.644,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
US 301 Virginia State line/Potomac River (Harry Nice Bridge)
I 595 /US 50
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 71
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☐ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 72
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 5/8/2006
38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker
39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 73
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 12041. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☒ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: MD 201 WideningPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: This project consists of the widening of MD 201 from north of I-95/I-495 at Cherrywood Lane to Ammendale Way from 2 or 3 lanes to 4 lanes. This project will also extend the designation of Maryland Route 201 from its current terminus at Powder Mill Road to continue along Edmonston Road and Old Baltimore Pike to US 1 north of Muirkirk Road, including the widening of Cedarhurst Drive from 2 to 4 lanes.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2045
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 4.5 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $1,034,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
MD 201 Edmonston Road, Old Baltimore Pike I 95 /I-495 US 1 North of Murkirk Road
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 74
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 75
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☒ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☒ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 5/8/2006
38. Last Updated by: Andrew Austin
39. Last Updated On: 11/30/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 76
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 26181. Submitting Agency: MDOT/State Highway Administration
2. Secondary Agency: Montgomery County
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☒ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: MD 97 CorridorPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: The MD 97 Montgomery Hills project will evaluate safety and accessibility issues on MD 97. Widen from 6/7 to 7/8 lanes. Sidewalks and wide curb lanes to accommodate bicycles will be included where appropriate.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2025
12. Project Manager:
13. Project Manager E-Mail:
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 1 mile
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $52,000 cost estimate as of 08/01/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☐ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
MD 97 Georgia Avenue MD 390 16th Street MD 192 Forest Glen Road
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 77
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 78
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☐ Yes; ☒ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 1/7/2008
38. Last Updated by: Matt Baker
39. Last Updated On: 11/21/2016
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 79
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM
Basic Project Information 1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ⛝ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ⛝ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: Randolph Road Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:Randolph Road
8. From (☐ at): US 29
9. To: MD 355
10. Description: This project provides for the detailed studies and construction related to a Bus RapidTransit (BRT) line on Randolph Road from the White Flint Metro Station on MD 355 to at Tech Road at US 29.Randolph Road is a commuter corridor with traffic and congestion in the westbound direction in the morningand the eastbound direction in the evening. Major activity centers include White Flint, Glenmont, and theemerging mixed-use center at White Oak. Randolph Road provides important linkages to other BRT corridorsand is important for the integrity of the BRT network. A mixed traffic transitway is recommended for thiscorridor. The County Council approved the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan, anamendment to the Master Plan of Highways and Transportation, on November 26, 2013. The amendmentauthorizes the Department of Transportation to study enhanced transit options and Bus Rapid Transit for 10transit corridors, including: Georgia Avenue North, Georgia Avenue South, MD 355 North, MD 355 South, NewHampshire Avenue, North Bethesda Transitway, Randolph Road, University Boulevard, US 29, Veirs Mill Roadand Corridor Cities Transitway.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2040
12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin 13. Project Manager E-Mail: Joana.Conklin@montgomerycountymd,gov
14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm
15. Total Miles: 10 miles16. Schematic (file upload):17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): 102,000 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017
20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ⛝ Federal ☐ State ⛝Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 80
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV⛝ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail⛝ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ⛝ Metrobus ⛝ Local Bus⛝ Bicycling ⛝ Walking ☐ Other
⛝ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e.,persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
⛝ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?⛝ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?⛝ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
⛝Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
⛝ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit without building newcapacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?
⛝ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirPlease identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework ResponsePlease provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.Advances goals of Master Plans in White Flint and White Oak.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a.⛝ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency.
b.⛝ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ⛝ No ii. If
yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 81
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d.⛝ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ⛝Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ⛝ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ⛝ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ⛝ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ⛝ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ⛝ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ⛝ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ⛝ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one, or
indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
⛝ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 82
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:37. Created On:38. Last Updated by:39. Last Updated On:40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 83
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM
Basic Project Information1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ⛝ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ⛝ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: North Bethesda Transitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:Rock Spring Drive / Old Georgetown Road
8. From (☐ at): Montgomery Mall Transit Center
9. To: White Flint Metrorail Station or Grosvenor Metrorail Station
10. Description: This project provides for detailed studies and construction related to the North BethesdaTransitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line. The North Bethesda Transitway connects the Rock Spring officepark area and the Montgomery Mall Transit Center to the Metrorail Red Line. Much of the right-of-way alongRock Spring Drive, Fernwood Road, and Tuckerman Lane is currently available through easements anddedications provided through the development review process. There are two alternative routes in theeasternmost portion of the corridor. One alternative is in dedicated lanes following Tuckerman Lane to theGrosvenor Metro Station. The other alternative would proceed north on Old Georgetown Road in a dedicatedlane to the western leg of Executive Boulevard, and then east on Old Georgetown Road in mixed traffic toRockville Pike and the White Flint Metro Station.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2035
12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin
13. Project Manager E-Mail: Joana.Conklin@montgomerycountymd,gov
14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm
15. Total Miles: 3.5 miles16. Schematic (file upload):17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): 115,150 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017
20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ⛝ Federal ☐ State ⛝Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 84
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation OptionsPlease identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV ⛝ Local Bus⛝ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail⛝ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ⛝ Metrobus⛝Bicycling ⛝ Walking ☐ Other
⛝ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e.,persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
⛝ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?⛝ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
⛝ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
⛝ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit without building newcapacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?
⛝ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?⛝ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ AirPlease identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.
☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework ResponsePlease provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Advances goals of Master Plans in White Flint and Rock Spring.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a.⛝ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b.⛝ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 85
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ⛝ No ii. If
yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d.⛝ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ⛝Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ⛝ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ⛝ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ⛝ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ⛝ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ⛝ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ⛝ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ⛝ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ⛝ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one, or
indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
⛝ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction ☐ Theconstruction costs for the project are less than $10 million.c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blank
Congestion Management Documentation Form.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 86
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:37. Created On:38. Last Updated by:39. Last Updated On:40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 87
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 34241. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: MD 355 Bus Rapid TransitPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: MD 355 includes numerous activity centers along the corridor planned for a high level of development that will support all-day travel throughout the corridor. It is also characterized by heavy congestion and high transit ridership potential. The corridor has several major existing and planned activity nodes, including Gaithersburg, Rockville, Twinbrook, White Flint, National Institutes of Health/Walter Reed National Medical Center, and the Bethesda CBD. This project will plan, design, and construct bus rapid transit service from Clarksburg to Bethesda. Project will be broken up into three phases with project completion in 2045: Phase 1 completion in 2025, Phase 2 in 2035 and Phase 3 in 2045.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2045
12. Project Manager: Corey Pitts
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/BRT/md355project.html
15. Total Miles: 22 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $1,080,000 cost estimate as of 10/31/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☒ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
MD 355
MD 410 East-West Highway
Clarksburg Road
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 88
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.This project supports the transportation element of various community master plans along the MD 355 corridor.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 89
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation
30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On:
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 90
Basic Project Information CEID 3672
1. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: New Hampshire Avenue Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Prefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: This project provides for the design and construction related to a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on New
Hampshire Avenue from the Colesville park-and-ride lot to Eastern Avenue. New Hampshire Avenue is
a commuter corridor, with most traffic flowing southbound in the morning and northbound in the
evening. Activity centers are located at Takoma/Langley Crossroads and the emerging mixed-use
center at White Oak. Corridor recommendations, from north to south, include a mixed traffic transitway
from Colesville park-and-ride to Lockwood Drive, and dedicated lane(s) from Lockwood Drive to the
District line. The County Council approved the Countywide Transit Corridors Functional Master Plan, an
amendment to the Master Plan of Highways and Transportation, on November 26, 2013.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2045
12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL: http://montgomeryplanning.org/transportation/highways/brt.shtm
15. Total Miles: 8.4 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $285,000 cost estimate as of 10/25/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue Colesville Park-and-Ride Lot Eastern Avenue
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 91
☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.Advances goals of Master Plans in White Oak and Silver Spring.
Federal Planning Factors
29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:a.☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and
efficiency.
b.☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c.☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d.☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e.☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f.☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g.☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h.☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i.☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j.☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 92
k.☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation
30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information
31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management
33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes
35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On:
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 93
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 34241. Submitting Agency: Montgomery County Department of Transportation
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID: CIP 501318
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☒ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: Veirs Mill Road (MD 586) Bus Rapid Transit ProjectPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: This project will implement a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line on Veirs Mill Road between Rockville and Wheaton Metrorail stations. The project consists of construction of queue jumps and installation of transit signal priority at key intersections, new transit service using articulated BRT vehicles, BRT stations with level boarding and off-board fare collection, and pedestrian/bike improvements.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2030
12. Project Manager: Joana Conklin
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL: https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/BRT
15. Total Miles: 6.1 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload): Corridor Study Report, October 2017 (selection of Recommended Alternative)
18. Jurisdictions: Montgomery County
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $80,000 cost estimate as of 10/31/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☐ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☒ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☒ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?
MD 586 Veirs Mill Road
MD 355 Rockville Pike
MD 97 Georgia Avenue
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 94
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☒ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☒ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☐ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.This project supports the transportation element of various community master plans along the MD 586 corridor.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☐ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation
30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ No
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 95
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☐ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☒ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On:
38. Last Updated by:
39. Last Updated On:
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 96
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 20691. Submitting Agency: VDOT
2. Secondary Agency:
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: I-495 HOT/HOV LanesPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: The northern extension of VDOT’s I-495 High Occupancy/Toll (HOT) lanes has been in the long range transportation plan since 2005, as part of the larger project that resulted in creation of HOT lanes from the Springfield Interchange to Old Dominion Drive near Tysons. The plan is being amended to better coordinate with the I-495 HOT lanes project in Maryland. VDOT will extend the I-495 HOT Lanes from Old Dominion Drive north to the American Legion Bridge. The project will include two HOT lanes in each direction. VDOT anticipates this will be funded primarily by toll revenues, possibly through a pubic private partnership.
The existing CLRP includes extension of two HOT lanes in each direction from Old Dominion Drive to George Washington Parkway by 2025, and extension of one HOT Lane in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2030. The plan is being amended to extend two HOT lanes in each direction from George Washington Parkway to the American Legion Bridge by 2025.
As a result of the collaboration between VDOT and MDOT, Maryland’s HOT lanes project, which includes improving the capacity of the American Legion Bridge, will connect to an equivalent managed lane system at the Virginia state line.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2025
12. Project Manager: Theresa DeFore
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 12 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $500,000 cost estimate as of 12/11/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☒ Private ☒ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
I 495 Capital Beltway I 95/ 395/495 – Springfield Interchange
American Legion Bridge
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 97
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☒ Carpool/HOV☒ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☒ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☒ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☐ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☐ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 98
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation
30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator:
37. Created On: 12/13/2006
38. Last Updated by: Norman Whitaker
39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017
40. Comments:
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 99
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36671. Submitting Agency: VDOT
2. Secondary Agency: Prince William County DPW
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☒ Interstate ☐ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: I-95 Auxiliary Lane, between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158Prefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: This project includes adding an auxiliary lane on southbound Interstate 95, from the Route 123 entrance ramp, which will merge into an existing lane before the Route 294 exit ramp. The length of the project is approximately 1.4 miles.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2028
12. Project Manager: Ricardo Canizales
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL:
15. Total Miles: 1.4 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions:
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $27,500 cost estimate as of 10/26/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☐ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☒ Express/Commuter bus ☒ Metrobus ☒ Local Bus☐ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☒ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?
I 95 VA 123 VA 294
Appendix B: Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 100
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☐ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☒ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☐ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☒ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.The construction of an auxiliary lane on Interstate 95 between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158 will improveoperations between two major interstate interchanges. This project will address congestion and improve access to boththe Route 123 and Route 294 exits. The project is in line with NVTA’s Regional TransAction Goal by investing intransportation improvements that reduces congestion and crowding experienced by travelers in the region.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
ii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem: Vehicles are forced tomerge in a short distance.
c. ☐ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☐ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☐ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☐ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☐ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☐ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 101
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
Environmental Mitigation
30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☐ Yes; ☒ Noa. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☐ Air Quality; ☐ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☐ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☐ Noise; ☐ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☐ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Elizabeth Scullin
37. Created On: 12/11/2017
38. Last Updated by: Cina Dabestani
39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017
40. Comments:
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 102
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM Basic Project Information CEID 36081. Submitting Agency: VDOT
2. Secondary Agency: Loudoun County
3. Agency Project ID:
4. Project Type: ☐ Interstate ☒ Primary ☐ Secondary ☐ Urban ☐ Bridge ☐ Bike/Ped ☐ Transit ☐ CMAQ
☐ ITS ☐ Enhancement ☐ Other ☐ Federal Lands Highways Program
☐ Human Service Transportation Coordination ☐ TERMs
5. Category: ☒ System Expansion ☐ System Maintenance ☐ Operational Program ☐ Study ☐ Other
6. Project Name: Route 15 WideningPrefix Route Name Modifier
7. Facility:
8. From (☐ at):
9. To:
10. Description: Reconstruction with added capacity. This two lane road will be widened to four lanes.
11. Projected Completion Year: 2025
12. Project Manager: James Zeller
13. Project Manager E-Mail: [email protected]
14. Project Information URL: www.loudoun.gov/Route15
15. Total Miles: 3.6 miles
16. Schematic (file upload):
17. State/Local Project Standing (file upload):
18. Jurisdictions: Loudoun County
19. 2018 Baseline Cost (in Thousands): $33 million cost estimate as of 10/17/2017 20. Amended Cost (in Thousands): cost estimate as of MM/DD/YYYY
21. Funding Sources: ☒ Federal ☒ State ☒ Local ☐ Private ☐ Bonds ☐ Other
Regional Policy Framework
Questions 22-27 address the goals identified in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan. Question 28 should be used to provide additional context of how this project supports these goals or other regional needs identified in the Call for Projects.
22. Provide a Comprehensive Range of Transportation Options
Please identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Single Driver ☐ Carpool/HOV☐ Metrorail ☐ Commuter Rail ☐ Streetcar/Light Rail☐ BRT ☐ Express/Commuter bus ☐ Metrobus ☐ Local Bus☒ Bicycling ☐ Walking ☐ Other
☐ Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals(i.e., persons with disabilities, low-incomes, and/or limited English proficiency?)
23. Promote Regional Activity Centers
☐ Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?☐ Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?
US 15 James Madison Highway Battlefield Parkway
VA 661 Montresor Road
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 103
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
☐ Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or more Activity Centers?
24. Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
☒ Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, or safety?
25. Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
☐ Project is primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transit withoutbuilding new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?☐ Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/or bicyclists?
26. Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteria pollutants?☒ Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases?
27. Support Interregional and International Travel and Commerce
Please identify all freight carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes.☒ Long-Haul Truck ☒ Local Delivery ☐ Rail ☐ Air
Please identify all passenger carrier modes that this project enhances, supports, or promotes. ☐ Air ☐ Amtrak intercity passenger rail ☐ Intercity bus
28. Additional Policy Framework Response
Please provide additional written information that describes how this project further supports or advances these and otherregional goals or needs.The project will improve regional north-south mobility between Virginia and Maryland.
Federal Planning Factors 29. Please identify any and all planning factors that are addressed by this project:
a. ☒ Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan area, especially by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, andefficiency.
b. ☒ Increase the safety of the transportation system for all motorized and non-motorized users.
i. Is this project being proposed specifically to address a safety issue? ☐ Yes; ☐ Noii. If yes, briefly describe (in quantifiable terms, where possible) the nature of the safety problem:
c. ☒ Increase the ability of the transportation system to support homeland security and to safeguard the personal security of allmotorized and non-motorized users.
d. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of people.
e. ☒ Increase accessibility and mobility of freight.
f. ☒ Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistencybetween transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns.
g. ☒ Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight.
h. ☒ Promote efficient system management and operation.
i. ☒ Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
j. ☒ Improve resiliency and reliability of the transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater impacts of surfacetransportation.
k. ☐ Enhance travel and tourism.
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 104
PROJECT SUBMISSION FORM (Continued)
Environmental Mitigation 30. Have any potential mitigation activities been identified for this project? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
a. If yes, what types of mitigation activities have been identified?
☒ Air Quality; ☒ Floodplains; ☐ Socioeconomics; ☒ Geology, Soils and Groundwater; ☐ Vibrations;
☐ Energy; ☒ Noise; ☒ Surface Water; ☐ Hazardous and Contaminated Materials; ☒ Wetlands
Congestion Management Information 31. Congested Conditions
a. Do traffic congestion conditions necessitate the proposed project or program? ☒ Yes; ☐ No
b. If so, is the congestion recurring or non-recurring? ☒ Recurring; ☐ Non-recurringc. If the congestion is on another facility, please identify it:
32. Capacity
a. Is this a capacity-increasing project on a limited access highway or other principal arterial? ☒ Yes; ☐ Nob. If the answer to Question 32.a was “yes”, are any of the following exemption criteria true about the project? (Choose one,
or indicate that none of the exemption criteria apply):
☒ None of the exemption criteria apply to this project – a Congestion Management Documentation Form is required
☐ The project will not use federal funds in any phase of development or construction (100% state, local, and/or private funding)
☐ The number of lane-miles added to the highway system by the project totals less than one lane-mile
☐ The project is an intersection reconstruction or other traffic engineering improvement, including replacement of an at-gradeintersection with an interchange
☐ The project, such as a transit, bicycle or pedestrian facility, will not allow private single-occupant motor vehicles
☐ The project consists of preliminary studies or engineering only, and is not funded for construction
☐ The construction costs for the project are less than $10 million.
c. If the project is not exempt and requires a Congestion Management Documentation Form, click here to open a blankCongestion Management Documentation Form.
Record Management 33. Completed Year:
34. Project is being withdrawn from the CLRP: ☐ Yes35. Withdrawn Date: MM/DD/YYYY36. Record Creator: Cina Dabestani
37. Created On: 10/30/2017
38. Last Updated by: Regina Moore
39. Last Updated On: 12/12/2017
40. Comments:
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 105
ALL PROJECTS IN THE CONSTRAINED ELEMENT OF VISUALIZE 2045
October 17, 2018 Appendix B – Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element I 106
All costs shown in $1,000s
District of ColumbiaDDOT
System MaintenanceInterstate Projects
Rehabilitation of I-395 HOV Bridge over Potomac River
Facility: I 395 HOV
From: East Potomac Bank
To: West Potomac Bank
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $39,250
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3305
Rehabilitation of I-66 Ramp to Whitehurst Freeway over Potomac Pkwy and Rock Creek (Bridge No.1303)
Facility: I-66 Ramp
From:
To: Whitehurst Freeway over Potomac Pkwy and Rock Creek Bridge
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $6,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3457
OtherInterstate Projects
Return to L’Enfant
Facility: I 395 Center Leg Freeway
From: Massachusetts Avenue, NW
To: E St., NW (Between 2nd & 3rd)
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $27,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2813
System ExpansionPrimary Projects
Anacostia Waterfront Initiative
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $65,100
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1589
South Capitol Street
Facility:
From: Independence Avenue
To: Martin Luther King Jr., Boulevard
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $822,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1570
St. Elizabeth Access
Facility: Several locations
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $200,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2860
StudyPrimary Projects
Bus Only Lane (Planning and Implementation)
Facility: H & I Street Bus only Lanes
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3196
Operational ProgramPrimary Projects
Audit and Compliance
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3195
OtherPrimary Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 107
All costs shown in $1,000s
Reconstruct New Jersey Avenue NW from H Street to N Street
Facility: New Jersey Avenue NW
From: H Street NW
To: N Street NW
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $15,500
Agency Proj. ID: SR055A
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3399
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
Southern Avenue
Facility: Southern Avenue
From: Branch Avenue
To: Naylor Road, S.E.
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $4,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2867
System MaintenanceSecondary Projects
Mid City East
Facility: Bates- Hanover, Bloomingdale, Eckington, Edgewood, LeDroit Park, Sursum Corda, and T
From: Bates- Hanover
To: Truxton Circle
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3297
Neighborhood Roadside Improvements
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $3,900
Agency Proj. ID: ED019A, SR
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3397
Reconstruction of 18th Street, NW from Virginia Ave to Connecticut Ave/M Street
Facility: 18th Street NW
From: Virginia Ave NW
To: Connecticut Ave NW / M Street NW
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $20,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3452
Reconstruction of Harvard Street NW from 16th Street NW to Georgia Ave NW
Facility: Harvard Street NW
From: 16th Street NW
To: Georgia Avenue NW
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3488
Reconstruction of Kenyon Street NW from Park Place to 13th Street
Facility: Kenyon Street NW
From: Park Place NW
To: 13th Street NW
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $6,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3455
Reconstruction of Ward II
Facility: Ward II- 4 Locations
From:
To: Ward II
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3454
Rehabilitation of Eastern Avenue NE from New Hamphire Ave, NE to Whitter Street NW
Facility: Eastern Avenue NE
From: New Hampshire Ave NE
To: Whitter Street NW
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $4,324
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3462
Safety Improvements of 22nd and I NW
Facility: Pennsylvania Ave. NW
From: 22nd Street NW
To: I Street
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3505
StudySecondary Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 108
All costs shown in $1,000s
C Street NE Implementation
Facility: C St NE/North Carolina Ave NE
From: Oklahoma Avenue
To: 14th Street NE
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $14,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3077
Florida Avenue Transportation Study
Facility: Florida Avenue, NE
From: 1St Street, NE
To: H Street, NE
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $12,000
Agency Proj. ID: ZU033A
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3382
Operational ProgramSecondary Projects
Livability Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2888
OtherSecondary Projects
Maryland Avenue Pedestrian Safety Project
Facility: Maryland Ave. NE
From: Constitution Avenue
To: 15th Street
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $18,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3075
Southeast Boulevard/Barney Circle Environmental Assessment
Facility: Southeast Boulevard
From: Barney Circle
To: 11th St SE
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3511
System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects
Lincoln Connector Trail
Facility: Bladensburg RD SE on west
From: Via Lincoln to New York Ave
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3510
Metropolitan Branch Trail
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $12,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1166
National Recreational Trails
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $180
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1170
Rock Creek Park Trail
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $10,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1168
System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 109
All costs shown in $1,000s
New York Avenue Streetscape & Trail Project
Facility: 50 New York Avenue NE
From: Florida Avenue NE
To: Bladensburg Avenue NE
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $27,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3655
Oxon Run Trail Restoration
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $14,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1465
Reconstruction/Rehabilitation of Superstructure and Substructure Arizona Ave NW
Facility: Pedestrian Bridge and Trail at Arizona Ave NW
From: Nebraska Ave NW
To: Galena Ave NW
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $5,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3539
Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects
District-wide Bicycle and Pedestrian Management Program
Facility:
From: Bicycle racks, lanes and bicycle signs
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1171
Safe Routes to School
Facility: Safe Routes to School
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $6,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1352
OtherBike/Ped Projects
17th Street NW Protected Bike Lane
Facility: 17th Street
From: New Hampshire Avenue
To: K Street
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3651
Irving Street NE/NW Protected Bike Lane
Facility: Irving Street
From: Warder Street
To: Michigan Avenue
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $250
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3653
K Street NW Bikeway
Facility: K Street
From: 7th Street
To: 1st Street
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3652
Klingle Trail
Facility: Klingle Road
From: Woodley Road
To: Porter Street
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $11,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1122
Pennsylvania Avenue SE
Facility: Pennsylvania Avenue SE
From: 2nd Street, Independence Avenue
To: Barney Circle
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $250
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3654
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 110
All costs shown in $1,000s
South Capitol Street Trail
Facility: South Capitol Street
From: Firth Sterling Avenue SE
To: Southern Avenue Maryland state line
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $10,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3241
System ExpansionBridge Projects
Anacostia Freeway Bridges over Nicholson Street SE
Facility: Anacostia Freeway Bridge at Nicholson Street SE
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $16,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3191
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Monroe Street, NE Bridge over CSX & WMATA
Facility: Monroe St.
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3294
Rehabilitation of 14th Street, SW Bridge over Streetcar Terminal
Facility: 14th Street SW Bridge
From:
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $6,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3489
Rehabilitation of 16th St Bridge over Piney Branch Rd, NW (Bridge No. 0022)
Facility: 16th St Bridge NW
From:
To: over Piney Branch Rd, NW.
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3459
Rehabilitation of K Street NW Bridge, over Whitehurst Freeway Ramp (Bridge No. 1304)
Facility:
From:
To: over Whitehurst Freeway Ramp
Complete In: 2026
Cost: $7,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3458
Roadway and Bridge Improvement on Southern Avenue and Winkle Doodle Branch Bridge
Facility: Southern Avenue
From: South Capitol Street
To: 23rd Street
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2943
Tunnel Asset Management
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2890
StudyBridge Projects
H Street Bridge over Amtrak
Facility:
From: 3rd Street NE
To: North Capitol NE
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $230,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2925
Long Bridge Study
Facility: Long Bridge
From: Virginia Interface
To: 12th Street, SW
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $4,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2807
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 111
All costs shown in $1,000s
Operational ProgramEnhancement Projects
Transportation Alternatives Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $11,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1144
System MaintenanceITS Projects
Traffic Signal LED Replacement
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3242
Operational ProgramITS Projects
Traffic Control Center
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2555
Traffic Operations Improvements Citywide
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $126,532
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1151
OtherITS Projects
Construction of DDOT 511 System
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3518
System ExpansionOther Projects
Arboretum Bridge and Trail
Facility: Anacostia River Walk Trail east side over river to west side of river ar the Arboretum
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3509
System MaintenanceOther Projects
Asset Condition Assessment
Facility:
From:
To: District Wide
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2549
Local Sidewalk and Street Improvements Citywide
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $60,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1158
Rehabilitation of Anacostia Freeway Bridges over South Capitol Street (Bridge No. 1016 & 1017)
Facility: Anacostia Freeway over South Capitol Street
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $18,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3211
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 112
All costs shown in $1,000s
Roadside Improvements Citywide
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $37,955
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1157
Roadway Reconstruction Citywide
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1150
Streetscape
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $12,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1519
Traffic Signal Maintenance
Facility:
From:
To: Citywide
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2553
StudyOther Projects
Cleveland Park Study
Facility: Connecticut Ave. NW
From: Porter Street NW
To: Macomb Street NW
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID: PM0D7A
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3380
Metro Station Walkshed Connections Study
Facility: Metro Stations Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3506
South Dakota Ave NE and New York Ave NE Interchange Improvement Study
Facility: South Dakota Ave.
From: New York Ave NE
To: 33rd PL NE
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3508
Walter Reed Campus
Facility: Main Drive NW
From: Georgia Avenue
To: 16th Street NW
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $6,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3078
Operational ProgramOther Projects
Performance-Based Parking Pricing
Facility:
From: Citywide
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1002
Planning and Management Systems
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $19,900
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1155
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 113
All costs shown in $1,000s
Safety Improvements
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $101,822
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1148
Traffic Congestion Mitigation
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1470
OtherOther Projects
Streetscape of Connecticut Ave. NW from Dupont Circle to California Street
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID: New
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3504
Urban Forestry Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $60,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2548
Operational ProgramTERMs Projects
Transportation Emissions Reduction Measures
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $2,328
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1153
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
Bloomingdale/LeDroit Park Medium Term Flood Mitigation Project
Facility: Bloomingdale/LeDroit Park
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $7,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3298
Bridge Replacement/Rehabilitation Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $633,739
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1143
Citywide Pump Stations Rehab
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3198
Construction of Fiber Communication Network on Freeways
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $3,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3517
Maintenance of Stormwater management / Best Management Ponds
Facility: New York Ave. at South Dakota Ave. & Anacostia Freeway near mile marker 1
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $750
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2905
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 114
All costs shown in $1,000s
Normanstone/Fulton Street Culvert & LID
Facility: Normanstone Drive
From: Fulton STreet
To: 34th Street
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $2,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3299
Reconstruction of Kennedy Street NW from 16th St NW to Georgia Ave NW
Facility: Kennedy St NW
From: 16th NW
To: Georgia Ave
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3513
Resurfacing Streets and Freeways Citywide
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $85,150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1149
Southwest Freeway Bridgeover South Capitol Street
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID: New
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3503
Streetlight Asset Mgmt & Streetlight Construction - Local
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $52,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2557
Streetlight Upgrade
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $5,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3464
Systems Maintenance
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3268
Upgrade and Replacement of Overhead Freeway Signs
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3519
OtherMaintenance Projects
Streetlight Asset Mgmt & Streetlight Construction - Federal
Facility:
From: Districtwide
To: Districtwide
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $60,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2589
System ExpansionTransit Projects
16th Street NW Transit Priority Implementation
Facility: 16th Street NW
From: H Street NW
To: Arkansas Avenue NW
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3522
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 115
All costs shown in $1,000s
5303/5304 FTA Program
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $2,870
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3230
DC Circulator New Buses for Replacement and Expansion
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3233
Farragut Station Pedestrian Tunnel
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1175
Union Station to Georgetown Streetcar Line
Facility:
From: H Street NE at 3rd St. NE
To: Wisconsin Avenue under Whitehurst Fwy
Complete In: 2026
Cost: $348,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3081
Operational ProgramTransit Projects
DC Circulator System Operations
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3234
School Transit Subsidy (District Wide)
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3236
Specialized Transportation Services for the Elderly & Persons with Disabilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,280
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1172
StudyFreight Projects
District Freight Plan
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3005
Virginia Avenue Tunnel Project
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3079
Operational ProgramFreight Projects
Diesel Idle Reduction Program
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3465
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 116
All costs shown in $1,000s
Off-Hours Freight Delivery Pilot Project
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3431
Planning and Systems Enhancement for Weight Stations
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3265
System MaintenanceSafety Projects
On-Call Subsurface Pavement Investigation,Engineering
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $425
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3514
Suburban MarylandCharles County
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Poplar Hill Road Bridge over Zekiah Swamp Run
Facility: Poplar Hill Road Bridge
From: Zekiah Swamp Run
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $742
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3555
Frederick County
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
Christopher's Crossing
Facility: Christopher's Crossing
From: Shookstown Road
To: Rocky Springs Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3593
Christopher's Crossing
Facility: Christopher's Crossing
From: Walter Martz Road
To: Thomas Johnson Drive
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $6,310
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3594
Monocacy Blvd & Gashouse Pike - City of Frederick
Facility: Monocacy Blvd
From: Schifferstadt
To: Gas House Pike
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1181
System MaintenanceSecondary Projects
Various Roads - County Capital Improvement Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $26,311
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2691
StudySecondary Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 117
All costs shown in $1,000s
Shockley Drive/Spectrum Drive Connector
Facility: Shockley Drive/Spectrum Drive Connector
From: MD 85 Buckeystown Pike
To: Existing Spectrum Drive
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3038
System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects
Bikeways & Trails Program - County Capital Improvement Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $2,512
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2692
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Various Bridges - County Capital Improvement Program
Facility: Blacks Mill; Lewistown; Ball; Pete Wiles; Hessong Bridge; Reels Mill; Dixon Roads & Gas
From:
To:
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $10,718
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1180
MDOT/Maryland Transit Administration
System ExpansionEnhancement Projects
Camden New Stations
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3582
Penn New Stations
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $626,706
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3576
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
Camden Stations and Parking
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $199,260
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3581
Camden Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $40,173
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3584
Penn Stations and Parking
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $930,417
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3575
Penn Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $453,157
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3578
System ExpansionTransit Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 118
All costs shown in $1,000s
Brunswick Line Extensions
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3592
Brunswick New Stations
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3588
Camden Line Extensions
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3586
Corridor Cities Transitway (CCT)
Facility:
From: Shady Grove
To: Metropolitan Grove
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $545,000
Agency Proj. ID: 1108
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1649
Penn Line Extensions
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $120,520
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3580
Purple Line
Facility: Purple Line
From: Bethesda
To: New Carrollton
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,410,000
Agency Proj. ID: 1042
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1133
Silver Spring Transit Center Phase II
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $122,211
Agency Proj. ID: 254
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1563
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Improvements Project
Facility: US 29 BRT
From: Burtonsville Park and Ride Lot
To: Silver Spring Transit Center
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $39,104
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3423
System MaintenanceTransit Projects
Brunswick Rail Infrastructure
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $228,185
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3589
Brunswick Rolling Stock
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3591
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 119
All costs shown in $1,000s
Brunswick Stations and Parking
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $348,706
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3587
Brunswick Train Storage and Maintenance Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $51,422
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3590
Camden Rail Infrastructure
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $297,284
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3583
Camden Rolling Stock
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3585
Large Urban Systems- Capital
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $98,195
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1267
MARC Locomotive Replacement
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $340,690
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3573
MARC Northeast Corridor Commission Contribution
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $172,204
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3570
MARC Railcar Fleet Replacement
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $469,904
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3574
MARC Rolling Stock Preservation
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $31,690
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3572
MARC System Preservation
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $172,123
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3571
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 120
All costs shown in $1,000s
Penn Rail Infrastructure
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $2,278,638
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3577
Penn Rolling Stock
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3579
Operational ProgramTransit Projects
Large Urban Operating
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $155,540
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3270
Ridesharing
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $24,500
Agency Proj. ID: 45
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1265
Rural Transit - Operating Assistance
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $38,472
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=867
Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
Facility:
From:
To: Various
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $22,310
Agency Proj. ID: 0210
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3493
Small Urban Systems - Operating Assistance
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $242,256
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1540
OtherTransit Projects
Small Urban Systems - Capital
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $128,517
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1264
MDOT/Maryland Transportation Authority
System ExpansionPrimary Projects
Governor Harry W. Nice Bridge Improvement Project
Facility: US 301 Bridge over the Potomac River
From: US 301 Charles County, MD
To: US King George County, VA
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $768,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2617
MDOT/State Highway Administration
System ExpansionInterstate Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 121
All costs shown in $1,000s
I-270 at Watkins Mill Road Interchange
Facility: I 270
From: Watkins Mill Road
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $120,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1188
I-270 Corridor
Facility: I 270
From: I 495
To: I 70 /US 40
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $3,428,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1186
I-270 Innovative Congestion Management
Facility: I 270 /I-270Y
From: I 70
To: I 495
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $113,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3564
I-70/US 40 at MD 144FA, Meadow Road, and Old National Pike Interchange
Facility: I 70 /US 40
From: MD 144FA /Meadow Road /Old National Pike
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $33,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2250
I-70/US 40 Corridor
Facility: I 70
From: Mount Phillip Road
To: East of MD 144FA
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $143,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1187
I-95/I-495 at Greenbelt Metro Station Interchange
Facility: I 95 /I 495
From: Greenbelt Metro Station
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $196,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1479
I-95/I-495 Corridor (North and West)
Facility: I 95 /I 495
From: Virginia State line/Potomac River (American Legion Bridge)
To: Baltimore Washington Parkway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,011,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3281
I-95/I-495 Corridor (South and East)
Facility: I 95 /I 495
From: Baltimore Washington Parkway
To: Virginia State line/Potomac River (Woodrow Wilson Bridge)
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,161,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1182
Operational ProgramInterstate Projects
Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Corridors
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $350,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3637
System ExpansionPrimary Projects
MD 2/MD 4 Corridor (Calvert County)
Facility: MD 2 /MD 4
From: North of Stoakley Road /Hospital Drive
To: South of MD 765A
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $228,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1200
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 122
All costs shown in $1,000s
MD 210 Corridor
Facility: MD 210
From: I 95 /I 495
To: MD 228
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $754,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1199
MD 3 Corridor
Facility: MD 3
From: I 595 /US 50 /US 301
To: I 97 /MD 32
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $1,797,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1195
MD 4 at Suitland Parkway Interchange
Facility: MD 4
From: Suitland Parkway
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $131,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3446
MD 4 Corridor (Calvert County/Saint Mary's County)
Facility: MD 4
From: MD 2
To: MD 235
Complete In: 2031
Cost: $861,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2246
MD 4 Corridor (Prince George's County)
Facility: MD 4
From: I 95 /I 495
To: MD 223
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $533,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1194
MD 5 Corridor
Facility: MD 5
From: I 95 /I 495
To: US 301 (North Junction)
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $790,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1196
US 15 at Monocacy Boulevard Interchange
Facility: US 15
From: Monocacy Boulevard
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $61,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=913
US 15 Corridor (North of Frederick City)
Facility: US 15
From: MD 26
To: North of Biggs Ford Road
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $213,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3567
US 15/US 40 Corridor (Frederick City)
Facility: US 15 /US 40
From: I 70
To: MD 26
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $207,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3566
US 29 Corridor
Facility: US 29
From: Sligo Creek Parkway
To: Howard County line/Patuxent River
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $646,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1197
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 123
All costs shown in $1,000s
US 301 Corridor (Bowie)
Facility: US 301
From: I 595 /US 50
To: North of Mount Oak Road
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $449,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1619
US 301 Corridor (Waldorf)
Facility: US 301
From: MD 5 (north junction)
To: Smallwood Road
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $199,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2239
US 301 South Corridor Transportation Study
Facility: US 301
From: Virginia State line/Potomac River (Harry Nice Bridge)
To: I 595 /US 50
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $4,644,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1004
US 50 Corridor
Facility: US 50
From: District of Columbia line
To: I 95 /I 495
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $29,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3425
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
MD 117 Corridor
Facility: MD 117
From: I 270
To: West of Game Preserve Road
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $69,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1203
MD 124 Corridor
Facility: MD 124
From: Midcounty Highway
To: Warfield Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $129,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1206
MD 180/Ballenger Creek Pike Corridor
Facility: MD 180 /Ballenger Creek Pike
From: Greenfield Drive
To: Corporate Drive
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $170,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2261
MD 197 Corridor
Facility: MD 197
From: Kenhill Drive
To: MD 450
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $94,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2253
MD 202 Corridor
Facility: MD 202
From: Brightseat Road
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $24,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1190
MD 223 Corridor
Facility: MD 223
From: MD 4
To: Steed Road
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $120,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2248
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 124
All costs shown in $1,000s
MD 28/MD 198 Corridor
Facility: MD 28 Norbeck Road /MD 198
From: MD 97
To: I 95
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $413,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1462
MD 450 Corridor
Facility: MD 450
From: Stonybrook Drive
To: MD 3
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $67,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1207
MD 85 Corridor
Facility: MD 85
From: English Muffin Way
To: North of Grove Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $220,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1210
MD 97 at Brookeville
Facility: MD 97
From: Gold Mine Road
To: North of Brookeville
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $52,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1213
MD 97 at MD 28 Interchange
Facility: MD 97
From: MD 28
To:
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $155,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1211
MD 97 at Randolph Road Interchange
Facility: MD 97
From: Randolph Road
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $76,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1212
MD 97 Corridor
Facility: MD 97
From: MD 390
To: MD 192
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $52,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2618
Naval Support Activity Bethesda BRAC Improvements
Facility: Intersections near Naval Support Activity Bethesda
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $77,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2620
US 1 Corridor
Facility: US 1
From: College Avenue
To: I 95 /I 495
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $116,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1202
US 1/MD 201 Corridor
Facility: US 1
From: I 95 /I 495
To: North of Muirkirk Road
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,034,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1204
Operational ProgramTERMs Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 125
All costs shown in $1,000s
Transportation Emissions Reduction Measures
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $108,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1221
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
System Preservation Projects
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $17,273,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1193
Montgomery County
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
Burtonsville Access Road
Facility: Burtonsville Access Road
From: MD 198
To: entrance to Burtonsville Shopping Center
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $6,900
Agency Proj. ID: 500500
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=995
Century Boulevard
Facility: Century Boulevard
From: Current terminus south of Oxbridge Tract
To: Intersection with future Dorsey Mill Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $15,837
Agency Proj. ID: 501115
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3045
Chapman Avenue Extended
Facility: Chapman Avenue Extended
From: Randolph Road
To: Old Georgetown Road
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $21,363
Agency Proj. ID: 500719
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=947
Clarksburg Transportation Connections
Facility: Clarksburg Transportation Connections
From: Snowden Farm Parkway / Little Seneca Parkway/ Brink Rd
To: Ridge Road/Frederick Road/MD 355
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID: 501315
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3130
Dorsey Mill Road Bridge over I-270
Facility: I 270
From: Century Boulevard
To: Milestone Center Drive
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $9,100
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1577
Middlebrook Road Extended Widening
Facility: Middlebrook Road Ext.
From: MD 355
To: M Midcounty Highway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $16,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1229
Montrose Parkway East
Facility: Montrose Parkway East
From: Easter limits of MD 355/ Montrose Interchange
To: MD Veirs Mill Road / Parklawn Drive
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $139,900
Agency Proj. ID: 500717
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1492
Platt Ridge Drive Extended
Facility: Platt Ridge Drive
From: terminus at Jones Bridge Road
To: Montrose Driveway
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,300
Agency Proj. ID: 501200
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2912
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 126
All costs shown in $1,000s
System MaintenanceSecondary Projects
MD 355 at Randolph Road/Montrose Parkway (Montrose Parkway East)
Facility: Montrose Parkway
From: MD 355
To: MD 586
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $140,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1217
StudySecondary Projects
Goshen Road South
Facility: Goshen Road South
From: South of Girard Street
To: North of Warfield Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $128,630
Agency Proj. ID: 501107
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1226
Operational ProgramSecondary Projects
MidCounty Highway: MD 27 to MIddlebrook Road
Facility: Midcounty Highway Extended
From: MD 27 Ridge Road
To: Middlebrook Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $202,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1245
Snouffer School Road North
Facility: Snouffer School Road
From: MD 124 Centerway Road
To: Alliston Hollow Way
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $12,099
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1236
Snouffer School Road: Sweet Autumn Dr. to Centerway Road
Facility: Snouffer School Road: Sweet Autumn Drive to Centerway Rd
From: Sweet Autumn Drive
To: Centerway Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $23,710
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3141
System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects
Bethesda CBD Streetscape
Facility: Bethesda CBD Streetscape
From:
To: Bethesda CBD
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $8,214
Agency Proj. ID: 500102
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3043
Capital Crescent Trail
Facility: Capital Crescent Trail
From: Elm Street Park in Bethesda
To: Silver Spring
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $81,200
Agency Proj. ID: 501316
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3122
Falls Road East Side Hiker/Biker Path
Facility: Falls Road Bikeway - East Side
From: River Road
To: Dunster Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $22,340
Agency Proj. ID: 500905
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1586
Frederick Road Bike Path: Stringtown to Milestone Manor
Facility: Frederick Road (MD 355)
From: Stringtown Road
To: Milestone Manor Lane
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $7,193
Agency Proj. ID: 501118
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3102
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 127
All costs shown in $1,000s
MacArthur Boulevard Bikeway Improvements
Facility: MacArthur Boulevard
From: Oberlin Avenue
To: DC Line
Complete In: 2027
Cost: $17,500
Agency Proj. ID: 500718
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2827
MD 355 Multimodal Crossing
Facility: MD 355 Medical Center Metrorail Station/NIH
From: MD 355 Medical Center Metrorail Station/NIH
To: Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC)
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $73,000
Agency Proj. ID: 501209
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2817
Metropolitan Branch Trail
Facility: Metropolitan Branch Trail
From: Existing trail end in Takoma Park
To: Silver Spring Transit Center
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $12,147
Agency Proj. ID: 501110
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3042
Needwood Road Bikepath
Facility: Needwood Road Bikepath
From: Deer Lake Road
To: MD Muncaster Mill Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,200
Agency Proj. ID: 501304
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3125
Seven Locks Bikeway & Safety Improvements
Facility: Seven Locks BIkeway & Safety Improvements
From: Montrose Road
To: Bradley Boulevard
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $27,000
Agency Proj. ID: 501303
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3126
System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects
Sidewalk & Infrastructure Revitalization
Facility:
From:
To: Countywide
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $53,400
Agency Proj. ID: 508182
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3100
Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects
Bikeway Program - Minor Projects
Facility: Bikeway Program - Minor Projects
From: countywide
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $5,100
Agency Proj. ID: 507596
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1239
Sidewalk Program - Minor Projects
Facility: Sidewalk Program - Minor Projects
From: countywide
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $17,775
Agency Proj. ID: 506747
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1240
Transportation Improvements for Schools
Facility: Various
From:
To: Various
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,775
Agency Proj. ID: P509036
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3407
OtherBike/Ped Projects
Bicycle Pedestrian Priority Area Improvements
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,375
Agency Proj. ID: P501532
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3408
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 128
All costs shown in $1,000s
Flower Avenue Sidewalk
Facility: Flower Avenue
From: Piney Branch Road
To: Carroll Avenue
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $200
Agency Proj. ID: 501206
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3047
MD 355 Sidewalk (Hyattstown)
Facility: MD 355
From: Hyattstown Mill Road
To: Montgomery County / Frederick County Line
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $2,180
Agency Proj. ID: 501104
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3041
Pedestrian Safety Program
Facility: Pedestrian Safety Program
From:
To: Countywide
Complete In:
Cost: $16,312
Agency Proj. ID: 500333
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1444
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Beach Drive Bridge M-PK-24001
Facility: Beach Drive Bridge
From: Over Silver Creek
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2994
Bridge Renovation
Facility: County-wide
From: County-wide
To: County-wide
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $19,000
Agency Proj. ID: 509753
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3097
Brink Road Bridge M-0064001
Facility: Brink Road Bridge
From: Over Great Seneca Creek
To: Over Great Seneca Creek
Complete In: 2014
Cost: $1,500
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2995
Dennis Avenue Bridge Replacement M-0194
Facility: Dennis Avenue Bridge
From: Tributary to Sligo Creek
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $5,610
Agency Proj. ID: 501701
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3569
Elmhirst Parkway Bridge M-PK-13001
Facility: Elmhirst Parkway Bridge
From:
To: Over tributary to Rock Creek
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $1,965
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2997
Garrett Park Road Bridge M-PK-04001
Facility: Garrett Park Road Bridge M-PK-04001
From:
To: Over Rock Creek
Complete In:
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2998
Gold Mine Road Bridge M-0096001
Facility: Gold Mine Road Bridge M-0096001
From:
To: Over Hawlings River
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,433
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2999
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 129
All costs shown in $1,000s
Lyttonsville Bridge
Facility: Bridge over Georgetown Branch / Interim Capital Crescent Trail
From:
To:
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $2,500
Agency Proj. ID: P501421
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3406
Park Valley Road Bridge M-PK-03001
Facility:
From:
To: Over Sligo Creek
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $3,950
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3000
Piney Meetinghouse Road Bridge M-0021001
Facility: Piney Meetinghouse Road Bridge M-0021001
From:
To: Over Watts Branch
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,025
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3001
Valley Road Bridge M-0111001
Facility: Valley Road Bridge M-0111001
From:
To: Over Booze Creek
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $3,375
Agency Proj. ID: 509132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3002
System ExpansionEnhancement Projects
Silver Spring Green Trail
Facility: Silver Spring Green Trail
From: Silver Spring Metro Station
To: Sligo Creek Hiker-Biker Trail
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID: 509975
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1242
System MaintenanceITS Projects
Traffic Signal System Modernization
Facility: Traffic Signal System Modernization
From:
To:
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $35,897
Agency Proj. ID: 500704
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1620
Operational ProgramITS Projects
Advanced Transportation Management System
Facility: Advanced Transportation Management System
From: Countywide
To: Countywide
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $60,700
Agency Proj. ID: 509399
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1237
System ExpansionOther Projects
East Gude Drive Roadway Improvements
Facility: East Gude Drive Roadway Improvements
From: Crabbs Branch Way
To: Southlawn Drive
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $6,027
Agency Proj. ID: 501309
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3128
White Flint District East - Transportation
Facility:
From:
To: White Flint East
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $29,400
Agency Proj. ID: 501204
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3049
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 130
All costs shown in $1,000s
White Flint District West: Transportation & Workaround
Facility:
From:
To: White Flint
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $71,100
Agency Proj. ID: 501116
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3050
StudyOther Projects
White Flint Traffic Analysis and Mitigation
Facility: White Flint Sector Plan Area & Surrounding Area
From:
To: White Flint Sector Plan Area & Surrounding Area
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $1,949
Agency Proj. ID: 501202
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3051
Operational ProgramOther Projects
Traffic Signals
Facility: Countywide
From:
To: Countywide
Complete In:
Cost: $35,106
Agency Proj. ID: 507154
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3143
OtherOther Projects
Colesville Depot
Facility:
From:
To: Cape May Road
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $10,414
Agency Proj. ID: 500709
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3098
Intersection & Spot Improvements
Facility: Intersection and Spot Improvements
From:
To: Countywide
Complete In:
Cost: $8,904
Agency Proj. ID: 507017
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3105
Neighborhood Traffic Calming
Facility: Residential neighborhoods County-wide
From:
To: Residential Neighborhoods County-wide
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $2,631
Agency Proj. ID: 509523
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3106
Seminary Road Intersection Improvement
Facility: Seminary Road Intersection Improvement
From: Brookeville Road/Seminary Place Intersection
To: LInden Lane/Second Avenue Intersection
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $7,300
Agency Proj. ID: 501307
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3129
Streetlight Enhancements - CBD /Town Center
Facility: Streetlight Enhancements - CBD / Town Center
From:
To: CBDs and Town Centers
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $4,400
Agency Proj. ID: 500512
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3107
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
Bridge Preservation Program
Facility: County-wide
From:
To: County-wide
Complete In:
Cost: $8,779
Agency Proj. ID: 500313
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3096
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 131
All costs shown in $1,000s
Resurfacing: Primary/Arterial
Facility: County-wide
From:
To: County-wide
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $50,800
Agency Proj. ID: 508527
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3099
Transit Park and Ride Lot Renovations
Facility:
From:
To: Transit Park and Ride Lot Renovations
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID: 500534
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3101
System ExpansionTransit Projects
MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue BRT
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $285,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3672
North Bethesda Transitway Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project
Facility: Rock Spring Drive/Old Georgetown Road
From: Montgomery Mall Transit Center
To: White Flint Metrorail Station or Grosvenor Metrorail Station
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $115,150
Agency Proj. ID: CIP 501318
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3663
Olney Transit Center
Facility:
From: MD 108 adjacent to or north of MD 108
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1249
Randolph Road Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project
Facility: Randolph Road BRT
From: US 29
To: MD 355
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $102,000
Agency Proj. ID: CIP 501318
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3662
Veirs Mill Bus Rapid Transit
Facility: Veirs Mill Road
From: Wheaton Metrorail Station
To: Rockville Metrorail Station
Complete In: 2017
Cost: $6,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3103
System MaintenanceTransit Projects
ADA Compliance Transportation Access
Facility: ADA Compliance Transportation Access
From: Countywide
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $9,150
Agency Proj. ID: 509325
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1252
Bus Stop Improvement Program
Facility: Bus Stop Improvement Program
From: countywide
To:
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $5,100
Agency Proj. ID: 507658
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1255
Low or No Emissions FTA Electric Bus grant
Facility: Silver Spring Depot Charging Stations
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $4,395
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3595
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 132
All costs shown in $1,000s
RideOn Bus Fleet
Facility:
From: Countywide
To: County-wide
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $149,500
Agency Proj. ID: 500821
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1257
StudyTransit Projects
Countywide BRT Study
Facility:
From:
To: Countywide
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3053
MD 355 Bus Rapid Transit Study
Facility: MD 355
From: MD 410
To: Redgrave Place
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $1,080,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3424
Operational ProgramTransit Projects
Bethesda Bikeway and Pedestrian Facilities
Facility: Bethesda Bikeway and Pedestrian Facilities
From: Bethesda CBD
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $5,200
Agency Proj. ID: 500119
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1553
Veirs Mill Road Bus Enhancement
Facility: Veirs Mill Road
From: Rockville
To: Wheaton
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1253
OtherTransit Projects
Bethesda Metro South Entrance
Facility: Bethesda Metro
From:
To: Bethesda Metro
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $110,200
Agency Proj. ID: 500929
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2726
Montgomery Mall Transit Center
Facility: Montgomery Mall Transit Center
From: Montgomery Mall
To:
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $1,342
Agency Proj. ID: 500714
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1529
Prince George's County
System ExpansionPrimary Projects
Contee Road Reconstruction
Facility: Contee Road
From: US 1
To: Old Gunpowder Road
Complete In:
Cost: $18,835
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2619
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
Addison Road
Facility: Addison Road
From: MD 214
To: Walker Mill Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $20,981
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1268
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 133
All costs shown in $1,000s
Brandywine Road
Facility: Brandywine Road
From: MD 223 Piscataway Road north of
To: Thrift Road
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $960
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1273
Brinkley Road
Facility: Brinkley Road
From: MD 414 St. Barnabas Road
To: MD Allentown Road
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $14,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1274
Brooks Drive
Facility: Brooks Drive Extended
From: Marlboro Pike
To: Rollins Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,140
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1275
Campus Way North
Facility: Campus Way North
From: Lake Arbor Way
To: Evarts Drive
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,780
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1277
Cherry Hill Road
Facility: Cherry Hill Road
From: Montgomery County line
To: US 1 Baltimore Avenue
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $13,322
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1278
Church Road
Facility: Church Road
From: Woodmore Road
To: MD 214 Central Avenue
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $9,448
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1279
Columbia Park Road
Facility: Columbia Park Road
From: US 50
To: Columbia Terrace
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,370
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1280
Columbia Park Road
Facility: US 50 Columbia Park Road Ramps
From: WB ramp to Columbia Park Rd
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $64,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1313
Contee Road
Facility: Contee Road
From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue
To: Old Gunpowder Road
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $24,512
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1281
Dangerfield Road
Facility: Dangerfield Road
From: Cheltenham Avenue
To: MD Woodyard Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1282
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 134
All costs shown in $1,000s
Dower House Road
Facility: Dower House Road
From: MD 223 Woodyard Road
To: MD Pennsylvania Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $40,900
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1283
Fisher road
Facility: Fisher road
From: Brinkley Road
To: Holton Lane
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1284
Forbes Boulevard
Facility: Forbes Boulevard Extended
From: south of Amtrak
To: MD Greenbelt Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,770
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1285
Forestville Road
Facility: Forestville Road
From: Rena Road
To: I Ramps @ Forestville Road
Complete In: 2014
Cost: $2,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1286
Fort Washington Road
Facility: Fort Washington Road
From: Riverview road
To: MD Indian Head Highway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $3,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1287
Good Luck Road
Facility: Good Luck Road
From: MD 201 Kenliworth Avenue east of
To: MD Greenbelt Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $9,760
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1288
Hill Road
Facility: Hill Road
From: MD 214 Central Avenue
To: Sheriff Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $7,134
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1290
Iverson St.
Facility: Iverson St. Extended
From: Wheeler Road
To: 19th Avenue
Complete In: 2018
Cost:
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1015
Livingston Road and Bridge
Facility: Livingston Road
From: MD 210 Indian Head Highway at Eastover
To: MD Indian Head Highway at Kerby Hill Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $3,350
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1291
Lottsford Vista Road
Facility: Lottsford Vista Road
From: MD 704 ML King Jr Highway
To: Lottsford Road
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $10,150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1292
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 135
All costs shown in $1,000s
Metzerott Road
Facility: Metzerott Road
From: MD 650 New Hampshire Avenue
To: MD University Boulevard
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $8,520
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1295
Murkirk Road
Facility: Muirkirk Road
From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue west of
To: Odell Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $6,440
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1296
Oak Grove and Leeland Roads
Facility: Oak Grove and Leeland Roads
From: MD 193 Watkins Park Road
To: US Robert Crain Highway
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $6,450
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1297
Old Alexandria Ferry Road
Facility: Old Alexandria Ferry Road
From: MD 223 Woodyard Road
To: MD Branch Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,080
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1298
Old Branch Avenue
Facility: Old Branch Avenue
From: MD 223 Piscataway Road north of
To: Allentown Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,240
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1299
Old Fort Road
Facility: Old Fort Road Extended
From: MD 223 Piscataway Road
To: Old Fort Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $6,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1533
Old Gunpowder Road
Facility: Old Gunpowder Road
From: Powder Mill Road
To: MD Sandy Springs Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $17,764
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1300
Presidential Parkway
Facility: Presidential Parkway
From: Suitland Parkway
To: Melwood Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $12,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1324
Ritchie Road/Forestville Road
Facility: Ritchie Road/Forestville Road
From: Ritchie Marlboro Rd
To: MD Pennsylvania Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $22,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1302
Ritchie-Marlboro Road
Facility: Ritchie Marlboro Road
From: White House Road
To: Old Marlboro Pike
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $28,974
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2623
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 136
All costs shown in $1,000s
Rollins Avenue
Facility: Rollins Avenue
From: MD 214 Central Avenue
To: Walker Mill Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $7,380
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1303
Rosaryville Road
Facility: Rosaryville Road
From: US 301 Robert Crain Highway
To: MD Woodyard Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,090
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1304
Spine Road
Facility: Spine Road
From: MD/US Branch Avenue
To: MD Brandywine Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $11,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1305
Springfield Road
Facility: Springfield Road
From: MD 546 Lanham-Severn Road
To: Good Luck Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,460
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1306
Suitland Parkway
Facility: Suitland Parkway
From: interchange at Rena/Forestville Roads
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,830
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1307
Suitland Road
Facility: Suitland Road
From: MD 337 Allentown Road
To: MD Silver Hill Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $13,587
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1308
Sunnyside Avenue
Facility: Sunnyside Avenue
From: US 1 Baltimore Avenue
To: MD Kenliworth Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1309
Surratts Road
Facility: Surratts Road
From: Beverly Avenue
To: Brandywine Road
Complete In: 2012
Cost: $15,470
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1310
Temple Hill Road
Facility: Temple Hill Road
From: MD 223 Piscataway Road
To: MD St. Barnabas Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $10,310
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1311
Van Dusen Road
Facility: Van Dusen Road
From: Contee Road
To: MD Sandy Springs Road
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $21,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1314
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 137
All costs shown in $1,000s
Walker Mill Road
Facility: Walker Mill Road Extended
From: Silver Hill Road Extended
To: I
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $20,100
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1316
Wheeler Road
Facility: Wheeler Road
From: MD 414 St. Barnabas Road
To: District of Columbia limits
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,460
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1317
White House Road
Facility: White House Road
From: Ritchie-Marlboro Road
To: MD Largo-Landover Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $14,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1318
Whitfield Chapel Road
Facility: Whitfield Chapel Road
From: MD 450 Annapolis Road
To: Ardwick-Ardmore Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,334
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1319
Widen Karen Boulevard from Walker Mill Road to Central Avenue (MD 214)
Facility: Karen Boulevard
From: Walker Mill Road
To: MD 214 Central Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3438
Widen Westphalia Road
Facility: Westphalia Road
From: MD 4 Pennsylvania Avenue
To: Ritchie Malboro Road
Complete In:
Cost: $16,607
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2624
Woodyard Road
Facility: MD 223 Woodyard Road
From: Rosaryville Road
To: Dower House Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1294
System MaintenanceSecondary Projects
Auth Road
Facility: Auth Road
From: Henderson Way
To: MD Allentown Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $16,950
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2736
Montgomery Road Improvments
Facility: Montgomery Road
From: Powder Mill Road
To: US 1
Complete In:
Cost:
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2734
Oxon Hill Road
Facility: Oxon Hill Road
From: National Harbor Ent.
To: MD At the Livingston Sq.Shopping Center
Complete In: 2014
Cost: $20,944
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2257
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 138
All costs shown in $1,000s
Rhode Island Avenue
Facility: Rhode Island Avenue
From: MD 193 University Boulevard
To: US 1 Baltimore Avenue
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $11,327
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1301
Traffic Congestion Improvemets
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In:
Cost: $19,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2745
Operational ProgramSecondary Projects
Allentown Road Relocated
Facility: Allentown Road Relocated
From: MD 210 Indian Head Highway
To: Brinkley Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $9,090
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1270
Ardwick-Ardmore Road
Facility: Ardwick-Ardmore Road
From: MD 704
To: St. Josephs Drive
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $10,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1320
Bowie Race Track Road
Facility: Bowie Race Track Road
From: MD 450 Annapolis Road
To: Old Chapel Road
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $5,670
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1272
System MaintenanceUrban Projects
NEw Carrollton Transit Oriented Development Infrastrucure
Facility: Various locations County-wide
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $36,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3415
System MaintenanceBike/Ped Projects
School access project
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In:
Cost: $6,184
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3058
Operational ProgramBike/Ped Projects
Pedestrian Safety Improvements
Facility: Various locations County-wide
From:
To: various locations
Complete In:
Cost: $43,609
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3410
System ExpansionBridge Projects
Governor Bridge Road
Facility: Governor Bridge Road
From: US 301
To: Anne Arundel County
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $5,890
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1425
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 139
All costs shown in $1,000s
Brandywine Road Bridge Replacement
Facility: Brandywine Road Bridge
From: North side of Piscataway Creek
To: South side of Piscataway Creek
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,907
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2605
Bridge Rehabilitation, Federal Aid
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $10,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2600
Bridge Replacement - Governor Bridge Road
Facility: Over Patuxant River
From: East bank of river
To: West bank of river
Complete In:
Cost: $5,890
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3638
Bridge Replacement - Oxon Hill Road
Facility:
From:
To: Over Henson Creek
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $5,524
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2866
Bridge Replacement - Temple Hill Road
Facility:
From:
To: Over Pea HIll Branch
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $6,280
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3116
Bridge Replacement -Cherry Hill Road
Facility: Over Paint Branch
From:
To: Over Paint Branch
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $9,550
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3639
Commo Road Bridge Replacement
Facility:
From:
To: Over Piscataway Creek
Complete In:
Cost: $2,693
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3056
Sunnyside Avenue Bridge Replacement
Facility: Sunnyside Avenue Bridge
From: west side of Indian Creek
To: east side of Indian Creek
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $12,382
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2608
System MaintenanceEnhancement Projects
County Revitalization & Restoration 2
Facility: Various locations County-wide
From:
To: various locations county-wide
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $9,470
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3133
Operational ProgramEnhancement Projects
Green Street Improvements
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In:
Cost: $11,810
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3057
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 140
All costs shown in $1,000s
Planning and site Acquisition 2
Facility: various locations
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3411
Transportation Enhancements 2
Facility: Various locations County-wide
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $13,176
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3414
StudyOther Projects
Standard Details/Drawings for Low-Cost Bridge/Culvert Structures
Facility:
From:
To: Prince George's County
Complete In:
Cost: $100
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3495
OtherOther Projects
Developer Contribution Projects
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $23,144
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2738
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
Curb and Road Rehabilitation I & II
Facility:
From:
To: varoius locations
Complete In:
Cost: $115,761
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2737
Operational ProgramMaintenance Projects
ADA Right of Way Modifications
Facility:
From:
To: various locations
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $5,325
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3115
Operational ProgramTransit Projects
Bus Mass Transit/Metro Access 2
Facility:
From:
To: County wide
Complete In:
Cost: $8,247
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2891
System MaintenanceSafety Projects
Street Lights and Traffic Signals 2
Facility: Various locations County-wide
From:
To: various locations
Complete In:
Cost: $29,295
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3413
Northern VirginiaVDOT
System ExpansionInterstate Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 141
All costs shown in $1,000s
395 Express Lanes Project in Northern Virginia
Facility: I 395 HOV Lanes
From: Turkeycock Run near Duke Street
To: vicinity of Eads Street, Arlington County
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $220,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3525
Boundary Chanel Drive Modifications
Facility: Boundary Channel Drive
From: I 395 Shirley Highway
To: Old Jefferson Davis Hwy & N. Jefferson Davis
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $8,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3093
DAAH/I-495 Interchange Flyover Ramp Relocation (Phase IV DAAH)
Facility: I 495
From: EB Dulles Airport Access Highway (DAAH) - Inner Lanes
To: I NB GP Lanes
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $28,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3186
Dulles Airport Access Road
Facility:
From: Dulles Airport
To: VA
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $40,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1965
Dulles Greenway EB Transition
Facility: 267 Dulles Toll Road
From: Dulles Greenway/Dulles Toll Road Merge
To: Centreville Road
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $25,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3671
Dulles Toll Road Ramp to Greensboro Drive Extension
Facility:
From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
To: Greensboro Drive to Tyco Road
Complete In: 2036
Cost: $28,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3153
EPG Access to I-95
Facility: I 95 I-95 Reversible Ramp
From: EPG Southern Loop Road
To: I HOV/BUS/HOT Lanes
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $57,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2668
I-395 Construct 4th Southbound Lane
Facility: I 395 Henry G. Shirley Memorial Highway
From: VA 236 North of Duke Street
To: South of Edsall Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $58,500
Agency Proj. ID: 103316
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3179
I-495 Capital Beltway Auxiliary Lanes
Facility: I 495 Capital Beltway NB and SB
From: Hemming Avenue Underpass
To: VA Georgetown Pike
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $3,235
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3272
I-495 HOT/HOV Lanes
Facility: I 495 Capital Beltway HOT Lanes
From: I 95/ 395/495 - Springfield Interchange
To: American Legion Bridge
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $500,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2069
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 142
All costs shown in $1,000s
I-495 Interchange Ramp Phase II, Ramp 3 DAAH
Facility: I 495
From: SB I-495
To: WB Dulles Airport Access Highway (DAAH)
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $42,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3208
I-66 @ Route 28 Interchange Improvements
Facility: I 66 I-66 @Rte 28
From: 1.0mi west of Rte 28
To: 1.0 mi east of Rte 28
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $50,000
Agency Proj. ID: 103317
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3264
I-66 Corridor Improvements Project
Facility: I 66 Outrside of the Beltway
From: I 495 Fairfax
To: US 15 PWC
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $4,400,000
Agency Proj. ID: 0066-96A-4
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3448
I-66 Spot Improvements Inside the Beltway
Facility: I 66
From: Fairfax Dr to Sycamore St; Washington Blvd to Dulles Airport Access Road; & Lee Hwy/S
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $59,000
Agency Proj. ID: 78826
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2096
I-95 Auxiliary Lane, between Route 123, Exit 160 and Route 294, Exit 158
Facility: I 95
From: Rt 123
To: Rt 294
Complete In: 2028
Cost: $27,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3667
I-95 Express Lane Extension to Fredericksburg
Facility: I 95
From: Russell Road (exit 148)
To: 0.25 miles south of Exit 148
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $16,500
Agency Proj. ID: 110527
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3556
I-95 NB DIRECTIONAL OFF RAMP TO NB FAIRFAX COUNTY PARKWAY
Facility: I 95
From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway Exit 166
To: 0.6 mi west of Exit 166
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID: 93033
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2854
I-95 Reconstruct Interchange
Facility: I 95 Capital Beltway Interchange
From: VA 613
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $40,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2147
SB I-95 Ramp
Facility: I 95 I-95 Ramp
From: I 95 SB I-95
To: NB Fairfax County Parkway/EPG Southern Loop Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,581
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2667
Transit Service Improvements
Facility: I 66
From: Fauquier County Line
To: Rosslyn
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $3,205
Agency Proj. ID: 81009
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1759
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 143
All costs shown in $1,000s
Widen Dulles Greenway - Eastbound Only
Facility: Dulles Greenway - eastbound only
From: Toll Plaza
To: Dulles Toll Road
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3680
System MaintenanceInterstate Projects
Construct noise barrier to fulfill environmental commitments from the I395 Auxiliary Lane project. N
Facility: I 395
From: 0.280 mi. north of Duke Street
To: 0.048 mi. south of Sanger Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $7,000
Agency Proj. ID: 110729
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3562
I-395 NORTHERN EXTENSION MULTI-MODAL ACCESS TO PENTAGON (2B)
Facility: I 395
From: Edsall Road
To: Washington D.C.
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $10,000
Agency Proj. ID: 110728
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3561
StudyInterstate Projects
I-66 Study / Access Improvements(Outside the Beltway)
Facility: I 66
From: US 15 @ Haymarket
To: I- Capital Beltway
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $73,823
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1853
Operational ProgramInterstate Projects
Congestion Management Plan - GEC Mega Proj. Admin.
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID: 86527
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2270
I-66 Multimodal Improvement Project, inside the Beltway
Facility: I 66 Inside the Beltway
From: I 495 Fairfax County
To: RT 29 Near Roslyn, Arlington County
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $375,000
Agency Proj. ID: 107371
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3484
Interstate 395 - Study for Safety & Traffic on NB Lanes - PE Only
Facility: I 395
From: Boundary Drive
To: Washington D.C. Line
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $19,173
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2291
OtherInterstate Projects
I-395 NORTHERN EXTENSION PROJECT OWNER COSTS (2A)
Facility: I 395
From: Edsall Road
To: Washington D.C. Line
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $34,000
Agency Proj. ID: 108361
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3560
System ExpansionPrimary Projects
Boundary Channel Drive Interchange
Facility: Boundary Channel Drive
From: I-395
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $19,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3658
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 144
All costs shown in $1,000s
Construct Interchange at Prince William Pkwy and Clover Hill Road
Facility: VA 234 Prince William Parkway
From: Clover Hill Road
To:
Complete In: 2026
Cost: $14,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3665
Construct Interchange at Rte. 7 and Rte 659 - Belmont Ridge Road
Facility: VA 7
From: 1.0 mi. west of Rte 659
To: 0.5 east of Rte 659
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $72,000
Agency Proj. ID: 99481
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3010
Construct VA 234 Bypass Interchange @ Balls Ford Road
Facility: VA 234 Bypass
From: Va Balls Ford Road Relocated
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $145,000
Agency Proj. ID: 105420 , T
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3177
Dulles Toll Road Eastbound Collector/Distributor/Additional Lane
Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
From: VA 684 Spring Hill Road
To: VA Wiehle Ave.
Complete In: 2036
Cost: $62,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3151
Dulles Toll Road Ramp to Boone Blvd Extension
Facility:
From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
To: Boone Boulevard @ Ashgrove Lane
Complete In: 2037
Cost: $79,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3152
Dulles Toll Road Westbound Collector/Distributor/Additional Lane
Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
From: VA 684 Spring Hill Road
To: VA Wiehle Ave.
Complete In: 2037
Cost: $124,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3154
I-495 Overpass at Tysons Corner Center
Facility: New Bridge/Road
From: Tysons Corner Center RIng Road
To: Old Meadow Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $18,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3157
Lee Highway Widening
Facility: US 29 Lee Highway
From: VA 659 Union Mill Road
To: Buckleys Gate Drive
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $32,700
Agency Proj. ID: 110329
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3474
Manassas National Battlefield Park Bypass
Facility: Manassas National Battlefield Park Bypass
From: US 29 Intersection with Rte. 705 (Pageland Lane) & Rt 29
To: US West of intersection of Bull Run Post Office Rd & Rt 29
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $28,509
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3061
Nokesville Road Widening
Facility: VA 28 Nokesville Road
From: VA 619 Linton Hall Road
To: City of Manassas SW Corporate limit
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $34,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3163
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 145
All costs shown in $1,000s
Prince William Parkway / University Boulevard Interchange
Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway
From: VA 840 University Boulevard
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $70,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3471
Route 1 Improvements
Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
From: Mary's Way
To: VA Featherstone Drive
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $107,000
Agency Proj. ID: 104303
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3173
Route 1 Widening
Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
From: Fuller Road
To: Stafford County Line
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $58,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3291
Route 123 (Chain Bridge Road) Widening (Old Courthouse Road to Rt 7)
Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road
From: VA 677 Old Courthouse Road
To: VA Leesburg Pike
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $8,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3159
Route 15 Widening
Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway
From: Battlefield Parkway
To: VA 661 Montresor Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $33,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3608
Route 7 (Leesburg Pike) Widening (I-495-I-66)
Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
From: I 495 Capital Beltway
To: US Curtis Memorial Parkway
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $71,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3161
Route 7 (Leesburg Pike) Widening (VA 267 to Reston Ave.)
Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
From: VA 267 Dulles TollRoad
To: VA Reston Avenue
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $300,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3160
Rt 1 Widen to 6 lanes (Phase I of Rt 1/123 Interchange (CN Only)
Facility:
From: .50 miles south of existing Rte 123
To: .40 miles North of existing Rte 123
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $35,015
Agency Proj. ID: 94102
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2959
Rte 123 Widen Roadway to 4 Lanes
Facility: VA 123 Ox Road
From: Southward from Burke Center Parkway
To: Prince William County Line
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $59,412
Agency Proj. ID: 16622
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1784
Rte. 28 Widening
Facility: VA 28
From: Godwin Drive
To: South CIty Limits
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $13,700
Agency Proj. ID: 96721
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2956
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 146
All costs shown in $1,000s
Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes
Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway
From: US 29 Lee Highway
To: Rolling Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $269,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3472
Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes
Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway
From: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
To: Rugby Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $126,800
Agency Proj. ID: #52 - #53
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3473
Sudley Manor Drive/Prince William Parkway Interchange
Facility: VA 234 Prince William Parkway
From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $80,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3467
Sudley Road Third Lane
Facility: VA 234 Suddley Road
From: Grant Avenue
To: Godwin Drive
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $7,400
Agency Proj. ID: 109293
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3641
US 1 Construct 6-Lane divided roadway
Facility: US 1
From: VA 638 Neabsco Mills Road
To: VA Featherstone Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $22,982
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2685
US 1 Construct 6-Lane Divided Roadway
Facility: US 1
From: VA 1109 Brady's Hill Road
To: VA Neabsco Mills
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $127,000
Agency Proj. ID: 90339
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2594
US 1, Widen, Reconstruct Interchange, Study
Facility: US 1
From: Stafford County Line
To: I Capital Beltway SCL Alexandria
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $37,481
Agency Proj. ID: 107187
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1942
US 1/ VA 123 Interchange, Widen
Facility: US 1 Interchange
From: VA 123
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $110,100
Agency Proj. ID: 100938, 14
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2161
US 15 South King Street Widening
Facility: US 15 South King Street
From: Evergreen Mill Road
To: SCL of Leesburg
Complete In: 2013
Cost: $9,365
Agency Proj. ID: 17687
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2102
US 15, Widen
Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway
From: US 29 Lee Highway
To: VA 55
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $54,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1803
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 147
All costs shown in $1,000s
US 29, Construct, Widen
Facility: US 29
From: ECL City of Fairfax (vic. Nutley St.)
To: I Capital Beltway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $130,453
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1933
US 50 Improvements, Fairfax
Facility: US 50
From: ECL City of Fairfax
To: Arlington County Line
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $249,287
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2182
US 50 Interchange at Loudoun County Parkway
Facility: US 50 Lee Jackson Memorial Highway
From: VA 606 Loudoun County Parkway
To:
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $60,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2875
US 50 Interchanges (3 locations)
Facility: US 50 US 50
From: West Spine (Gum Srprings Rd);South Riding Blvd.;Tall Cedars Pkwy
To:
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $150,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3354
VA 123 Widen
Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road
From: VA 639 Horner
To: Devil's Reach Road
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $2,950
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1723
VA 123, Widen
Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road
From: Burke Center Parkway
To: Braddock Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $10,962
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1856
VA 234 Bypass Interchange @ Dumfries Road/Brentsville
Facility: VA 234 Bypass
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $74,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3178
VA 234 Dumfries Road Widening
Facility: VA 234 Dumfries Road
From: South Corporate Limits
To: Hastings Drive
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $4,353
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2020
VA 234, Widen/Construct with Interchange at US 1
Facility: VA 234 Dumfries Road
From: US 1
To: VA Bypass at Limstrong, VA 649
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $96,380
Agency Proj. ID: 205
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2114
VA 236, Reconstruct, Widen
Facility: VA 236
From: Pickett Road
To: I
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $58,206
Agency Proj. ID: 108685
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1760
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 148
All costs shown in $1,000s
VA 27, Reconstruct Interchange at VA 244
Facility: VA 27
From: VA 244 Columbia Pike
To:
Complete In: 2013
Cost: $51,516
Agency Proj. ID: 13528
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2117
VA 28 PPTA, Upgrade, Construct
Facility: VA 28
From: I 66
To: Loudoun County Line
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $100,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1734
VA 28 widen
Facility: VA 28 Nokesville Road
From: Godwin Drive
To: Manassas City Limits - west
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $13,778
Agency Proj. ID: 96721
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3219
VA 28- widening project
Facility: VA 28
From: VA 652 (Fitzwater Dr)
To: S. Infantry Lane
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $25,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3217
VA 28, Widen
Facility: VA 28
From: Fauquier County Line
To: Pennsylvania Avenue
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $70,900
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2045
VA 7, Widen
Facility: VA 7 Bypass
From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike West
To: US 15 South King Street (South)
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $54,711
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1870
VA 7, Widen
Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
From: Seven Corners
To: Bailey's Crossroads
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $34,318
Agency Proj. ID: 3164
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2175
VA 7, Widen, Upgrade
Facility: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
From: VA 7 Leesburg Bypass /US 15 East
To: I 495 Capital Beltway
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $49,319
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2105
VA Route 7/VA Route 659 Interchange
Facility: VA 7 Interchange
From: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $65,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2664
Vint Hill Road widening to 4 lanes
Facility: VA 215 Vint Hill Road
From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive
To: Kettle Run
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $16,000
Agency Proj. ID: 104554
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3551
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 149
All costs shown in $1,000s
Widen Rte 1 from Telegraph Rd (Fairfax County) to Annapolis Way (Prince William Cnty)
Facility: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
From: Lorton Road (fairfax County)
To: Annapolis Way (Prince William Country)
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $125,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3180
Widen VA 123, Chain Bridge Road from VA 7 to I-495
Facility: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road
From: 7 Leesburg Pike
To: 495 Capital Beltway
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $22,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3376
Widening of Rte 15 (James Madison Highway)
Facility: US 15 James Madison Highway
From: Thoroughfare Road
To: 1200' South of RR Tracks
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $45,000
Agency Proj. ID: T17496
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3162
StudyPrimary Projects
US 50 (Seven Corners Interchange)
Facility: US 50 Arlington Boulevard
From: Patrick Henry Drive
To: South Street
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3477
VA 28 Centreville Road (widen from 4-6 lanes divided)
Facility: VA 28 Centreville Road
From: VA 898 Old Centreville Road
To: Prince William County Line
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $68,829
Agency Proj. ID: 108720
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3479
VA Route 28 Study
Facility: VA 28
From: VA 234 Sudley Road
To: I 66
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,501
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3383
Operational ProgramPrimary Projects
Centreville Road Imrovements
Facility: US 28 Centreville Road
From: Liberia Road
To: Phoenix Dr.
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3635
Roundabout Sudley/Centreville
Facility: VA 28 Centreville Street
From: VA 234 Sudley Road
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $7,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3629
Rt. 28 Manasssas Bypass
Facility: Manassas Bypass
From: VA 234 Sudley Road
To: VA 28 Centreville Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $228,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1865
OtherPrimary Projects
Intersection Improvements RTE 15/29/Arrow Leaf Turn Lee Hwy RSFY15
Facility: US 29 Lee Highway
From: 400' East of the intersection with Arrow Leaf Turn
To: 400' West of the intersection with Arrow Leaf Turn
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $1,189
Agency Proj. ID: 105807
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3491
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 150
All costs shown in $1,000s
System ExpansionSecondary Projects
Arcola Boulevard (Center Segment)
Facility: Arcola Boulevard
From: Dulles West Boulevard
To: Evergreen Mills Road
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $9,526
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3308
Arcola Boulevard (Northern Segment)
Facility: VA 606 Arcola Boulevard
From: Evergreen Mills Road
To: Loudoun County Parkway
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $3,546
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3307
Arcola Boulevard (Southern Segment)
Facility: VA 606 Arcola Boulevard
From: Dulles West Boulevard
To: U.S. 50
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $54,928
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3306
Balls Ford Road- Widening from 2 to 4 lanes
Facility: VA 621 Balls Ford Road
From: VA Sudley Road
To: VA 622 Groveton Drive
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $67,405
Agency Proj. ID: T20903
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3377
Boone Boulevard Extension (Rt 123 t Ashgrove)
Facility: Boone Boulevard
From: VA 123 Chain Bridge Road
To: Ashgrove Lane
Complete In: 2036
Cost: $126,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3150
Braddock Rd
Facility: VA 620 Braddock Rd
From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway
To: VA Ox Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $16,710
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2158
Braddock Road – Route 659 to Fairfax County Line
Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road
From: VA 659 Gum Spring Road
To: Fairfax County Line
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $154,760
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3604
Braddock Road – Route 659 to Royal Hunter Drive
Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road
From: VA 659 Gun Spring Road
To: Royal Hunter Drive
Complete In: 2027
Cost: $6,095
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3605
Braddock/ Summerall/ Supreme Intersection Improvements
Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road
From: Summerall Drive (VA 1257) / Supreme Road (VA 1258)
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $4,421
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3606
Catharpin Road, Widen
Facility: VA 676 Catharpin Road
From: VA 55 John Marshall Highway
To: Heathcote Boulevard
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $9,150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1754
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 151
All costs shown in $1,000s
Claiborne Parkway Extension
Facility: Claiborne Parkway
From: Croson Road
To: Ryan Road
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $7,000
Agency Proj. ID: 102858
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3067
Croson Lane – Claiborne Parkway to Old Ryan Road
Facility: VA 645 Croson Lane
From: VA 901 Claiborne Parkway
To: VA 772 Old Ryan Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $21,270
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3607
Crosstrail Boulevard
Facility: VA 653 Crosstrail Boulevard
From: Sycolin Road
To: eastern boundary of county-owned property
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $70,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3310
Dulles West Blvd. Phase I
Facility: Dulles West Blvd
From: Dulles Landing Drive
To: Hutchinson Farm Drive
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $14,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3313
Dulles West Blvd.Phase II
Facility: Dulles West Blvd.
From: Hutchinson Drive
To: Arcola Blvd.
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $43,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3314
Evergreen Mills Road (Western Segment)
Facility: Evergreen Mills Road
From: Arcola Boulevard
To: Shreveport Drive
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $10,355
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3312
Fairfax County Parkway Improvements
Facility: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway
From: VA 123 Ox Road
To: VA Dulles Toll Road)
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $295,888
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2106
Franconia-Springfield Parkway (and SOV)
Facility: VA 289 Franconia-Springfield Parkway
From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway
To: VA 2677 Frontier Drive
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $16,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1833
Gallows Road Widening (Rt 7 to Prosperity Avenue
Facility: VA 650 Gallows Road
From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
To: VA Prosperity Avenue
Complete In: 2038
Cost: $94,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3156
Greensboro Drive Extension (Spring Hill to Tyco)
Facility: VA Greensboro Drive
From: VA Spring Hill Road
To: VA Tyco Road
Complete In: 2034
Cost: $58,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3155
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 152
All costs shown in $1,000s
Gum Spring Rd.
Facility: VA 659 Gum Spring Rd.
From: Prince William County Line
To: US
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $17,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1818
Jones Branch Dr. Connector
Facility: VA 3102 Scotts Crossing Rd
From: 123 Dolley Madison Blvd
To: Jones Branch Dr
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $58,840
Agency Proj. ID: 103907
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3060
Joplin Rd/Fuller Rd Quantico base access improvements
Facility: VA 619 FUller Road/Joplin Road
From: I-95 Ramp
To: Fuller Heights Rd
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $8,043
Agency Proj. ID: 92999
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3187
Loudoun County Parkway Widening
Facility: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway
From: US 50
To: Route 606
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $10,828
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3315
Loudoun County Pkwy
Facility: VA 607 Loudoun County Pkwy
From: VA 620 Braddock Road @ VA 613
To: VA Harry Byrd Highway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $11,470
Agency Proj. ID: 107953
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1878
Magarity Road Widening from Rt 7 (Leesburg Pike) to Great Falls Street
Facility: Magarity Road
From: VA 7 Leesburg Pike
To: VA Great Falls Street
Complete In: 2037
Cost: $63,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3158
McGraws Corner Drive
Facility: McGraws Corner Drive Parallel
From: US 29 Lee Highway
To: US 15 James Madison Highway
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $208,800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1985
Moorefield Boulevard – Mooreview Parkway to Moorefield Station
Facility: Moorefield Boulevard
From: VA 2298 Mooreview Parkway
To: Moorefield Boulevard
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $4,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3602
Neabsco Mills Road widen to 4 lanes
Facility: VA 638 Neabsco Mills Road
From: 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
To: Smoke Court
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $35,000
Agency Proj. ID: 107947
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3374
New Braddock Rd.
Facility: VA 620 New Braddock Rd.
From: VA 28
To: US @VA 622 (Stone Rd.) @ VA 662 (Stone Rd.)
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2206
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 153
All costs shown in $1,000s
New Guinea Road, Construct
Facility: VA 651 New Guinea Road
From: VA 123 Ox Road
To: Roberts Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $20,677
Agency Proj. ID: 15132
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1748
NewTelegraph Rd/Summit School Road
Facility: VA 1781 NewTelegraph Rd/Summit School Road
From: VA 849 Caton Hill
To: VA Minnieville Rd.
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $35,962
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1921
Northstar Boulevard (Missing Link #79)
Facility: VA 659 Northstar Boulevard Relocated
From: Shreveport Drive
To: U.S. 50
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $12,000
Agency Proj. ID: 106994
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3318
Potomac Shores
Facility: VA 234 Potomac Shores Parkway
From: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
To: Potomac Shores Parkway
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $10,941
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3480
Prentice Drive (EasternSegment)
Facility: VA 1071 Prentice Drive
From: Lockridge
To: Loudoun County Parkway
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $26,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3321
Prentice Drive (Western Segment)
Facility: VA 1071 Prentice Drive
From: Loudoun County Parkway
To: Loudoun Station Drive
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $36,700
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3320
Reconstruct and widen Rte. 659 - Belmont Ridge Road
Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Rd.
From: 267 Croson Ln
To: Harry Byrd Highway
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $80,000
Agency Proj. ID: 76243, 762
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2938
Rippon Boulevard Extension
Facility: VA 1392 Rippon Boulevard Extension
From: US 1 Jefferson Davis Highway
To: Rippon VRE Station
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $28,600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2008
River Heritage Boulevard
Facility: VA 4700 River Heritage Boulevard
From: Dominica Drive
To: Potomac Shores Parkway
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $5,357
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3481
River Heritage Boulevard widening
Facility: VA 4700 River Heritage Boulevard
From: Potomac Shores Parkway
To: Dominica Drive
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,209
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3482
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 154
All costs shown in $1,000s
Riverside Parkway (VA Route 7 North Collector Road) Extension
Facility: VA 2401 Riverside Parkway
From: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway
To: VA 2020 Ashburn Village Boulevard Extension
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $15,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3501
Rolling Road Widening
Facility: Rolling Road
From: Rt 5297 DeLong Road
To: Rt 4502 .01mi. N. of Fullerton Rd.
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $25,500
Agency Proj. ID: 102905
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3301
Rollins Ford Road Extension
Facility: Rollins Ford Road
From: Linton Hall Road
To: Wellington Road
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $44,231
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3293
Route 7 George Washington Boulevard Overpass
Facility: VA 1050 George Washington Boulevard Overpass
From: George Washington Boulevard
To: Richfield Street
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $28,000
Agency Proj. ID: 105584
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3327
Route 772 Transit Station Connector Bridge
Facility: VA 772 Transit Station Bridge
From: Dulles Greenway
To: Route 772 Transit Station
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $16,900
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3323
Rte 638 - Widen to 4 Lanes
Facility: VA 638 Pohick Road
From: US 1
To: I
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $12,456
Agency Proj. ID: 16505
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2645
Rte 659 - Belmont Ridge Road Reconstruction to four lanes
Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road - Loudoun County
From: Hay Road
To: 0.23MI N. Gloucester Parkway
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $61,000
Agency Proj. ID: 76244
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3034
Russell Branch Parkway (Western Segment)
Facility: VA 1061 Russell Branch Parkway
From: Belmont Bridge Road
To: Tournament Drive
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $16,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3324
Shirley Gate Road Extension & Intyerchange with Fairfax County Parkway with NO connections withPopes
Facility: VA 655 Shirley Gate Road Extension (on new alignment)
From: VA 620 Braddock Road
To: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $129,650
Agency Proj. ID: #1 & #18
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3468
Shreveport Drive (Western Segment)
Facility: VA 621 Shreveport Drive
From: Evergreen Mills Road
To: Belmont Ridge Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $12,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3326
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 155
All costs shown in $1,000s
Soapstone Drive 4-Lane Overpass
Facility: VA 4720 Soapstone Drive
From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive
To: VA 675 Sunset Hills Drive
Complete In: 2027
Cost: $2,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3450
South 12th Street Extension
Facility: S 12th Street
From: S Glebe Road
To: S Monroe Street
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $1,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3657
Sterling Boulevard Extension
Facility: VA 846 Sterling Boulevard Extension
From: Pacific Boulevard
To: Moran Road
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $12,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3329
Stringfellow Rd.
Facility: VA 645 Stringfellow Rd.
From: VA 7100 Fairfax County Parkway
To: US 50
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $25,800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1859
Telegraph Road widen
Facility: VA 1781 Telegraph Road
From: VA 294 Prince William Parkway
To: VA Caton Hill Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $11,200
Agency Proj. ID: 104802
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1837
University Boulevard Extension
Facility: VA 840 University Boulevard
From: Sudley Manor Drive
To: Devlin
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $33,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3292
University Boulevard Extension 2
Facility: VA 840 University Blvd
From: Devlin Road
To: Progress Court
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $100,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3470
VA 2190 Summit School Road Extension
Facility: VA 2190 Summit School Road Extension
From: Telegraph Road
To: VA 2190 Summit School Road (south end of existing)
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $11,400
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3227
VA 294 Prince William Parkway Improvements
Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway
From: VA 642 Hoadly Road
To: Liberia Avenue
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $263,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2718
VA 602 Reston Parkway Improvements
Facility: VA 602 Reston Pkwy.
From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive
To: VA Baron Cameron Avenue
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $52,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1849
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 156
All costs shown in $1,000s
VA 608, Frying Pan Road Widening
Facility: va 608 Frying Pan Road
From: VA 28 Sully Road
To: VA 657 Centreville Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $54,350
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3475
VA 611 Telegraph Road Widening
Facility: VA 611 Telegraph Road
From: US 1
To: VA Franconia Road
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $24,868
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2186
VA 613 Van Dorn Interchange at VA 644 Franconia Road PE COMPLETE
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,196
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3275
VA 636 Hooes Road
Facility: VA 636 Hooes Road
From: VA 286 Fairfax County Parkway
To: VA 600 Silverbrook Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $20,550
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3478
VA 638 Rolling Road Widening
Facility: VA 638 Rolling Road
From: VA 6945 Hunter Village Drive
To: VA Old Keene Mill Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $31,139
Agency Proj. ID: 5559
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1936
VA 643 Sycolin Road Paving/Widening
Facility: VA 643 Sycolin Road
From: Leesburg Town Limits
To: VA Belmont Ridge Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $50,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2209
VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road, Reconstruct
Facility: VA 659 Belmont Ridge Road Relocated
From: Prince William County Line
To: VA
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $34,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1897
VA Route 606 Ramp
Facility: VA 606 Ramp
From: VA 606 Eastbound
To: Lockridge Road northbound
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $10,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3355
VA Route 643 Extended - Shellhorn Road
Facility: VA 643 Shellhorn Road Extension
From: VA 606 Loudoun County Parkway
To: VA 634 Moran Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $127,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3502
VA Route 645 Extended - Westwind Drive
Facility: VA 645 Westwind Drive Extended
From: VA 607 Loudoun County Parkway (opposite Moorefield Boulevard)
To: VA 606 Old Ox Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $44,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3499
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 157
All costs shown in $1,000s
VA Route 7 Interchange at VA Route 690
Facility: VA 7 Interchange
From: VA 690
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $35,700
Agency Proj. ID: 111666
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3331
Van Buren Road - construct a four lane facility
Facility: VA 627 Van Buren Road
From: 234 Dumfries Road
To: 610 Cardinal Drive
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $93,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3372
Washington Boulevard Widening
Facility: Washington Boulevard
From: Wilson
To: Kirkwood
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $3,800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2830
Waxpool Road/ Loudoun County Parkway Intersection Improvements
Facility: Waxpool Road
From: Loudoun County Parkway
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $5,147
Agency Proj. ID: 111674
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3333
Wellington Road
Facility: VA 674 Wellington Road
From: VA 619 Linton Hall Road Relocated
To: VA Rixlew Lane
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $20,556
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2145
Widen Balls Ford Rd
Facility: VA 621 Balls Ford Road
From: Devlin Road
To: 234 Sudley Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $53,564
Agency Proj. ID: 80347
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2357
Widen Farmwell Road between Smith Switch and Ashburn Road
Facility: Farmwell Road
From: Smith Switch
To: Ashburn Road
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $7,000
Agency Proj. ID: 106996
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3443
Williamson Boulevard
Facility: Williamson Boulevard
From: VA 1566 Sudley Manor Drive
To: VA Portsmouth Road)
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2176
System MaintenanceSecondary Projects
Evergreen Mills Road (Eastern Segment)
Facility: VA 621 Evergreen Mills Road
From: Loudoun County Parkway
To: Arcola Boulevard
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $19,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3311
Rogues Road Reconstruction
Facility:
From: Prince William County Line
To: RT 605
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $9,390
Agency Proj. ID: 104300
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3487
StudySecondary Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 158
All costs shown in $1,000s
Braddock Road
Facility: VA 620 Braddock Road
From: I 495 I-495
To: VA Burke Lake Road
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1857
Town Center Parkway Underpass Study
Facility: Town Center Parkway
From: Sunrise Valley Drive
To: Sunset Hills Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3476
Operational ProgramSecondary Projects
Route 287 / Route 9 Intersection Improvements
Facility: VA 9 Charles Town Parkway
From: VA 287 Berlin Turnpike
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $12,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3486
OtherSecondary Projects
Crystal City Streets Program
Facility: Multiple local streets
From: Crystal City
To:
Complete In: 2026
Cost: $87,601
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3656
EDSALL ROAD WALKWAY
Facility: VA 648 EDSALL ROAD
From: Cherokee Avenue
To: 200 feet N of Beryl Road (0.5000 MI)
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $4,000
Agency Proj. ID: 110740
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3563
Mooreview Parkway (Missing Link)
Facility: VA 2298 Mooreview Parkway
From: Amberleigh Farm Drive
To: Old Ryan Road
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $6,300
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3316
System ExpansionUrban Projects
Battlefield Parkway, Construct
Facility: Battlefield Parkway
From: US 15 South of Leesburg
To: US Bypass north
Complete In: 2016
Cost: $45,000
Agency Proj. ID: 18992
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2139
East Elden Street (widening)
Facility: East Elden Street
From: Monroe Street
To: Herndon Parkway onto Fairfax County Parkway
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $43,995
Agency Proj. ID: 50100
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3222
Edwards Ferry Road at Route 15 Bypass Interchange
Facility: US 15 Rt 15 Bypass
From:
To: VA Edwards Ferry Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $27,000
Agency Proj. ID: 89890
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2671
Eisenhower Valley Access and Circulation Improvements
Facility: Eisenhower Valley Access and Circulation Improvements
From: City of Alexandria
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $70,046
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1783
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 159
All costs shown in $1,000s
Evergreen Mill Road Widening
Facility: Evergreen Mill Road
From: Rt 15 S. King Street
To: South City Limits
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $11,300
Agency Proj. ID: 104830
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3300
Grant Avenue Road Diet
Facility: VA 234 Grant Avenue
From: Lee AVenue
To: Wellington Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $11,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3375
Herndon Parkway Intersection at Van Buren Street Improvements (to include ped/bike connectivity)
Facility: Herndon Parkway
From: Van Buren
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $3,000
Agency Proj. ID: 89889
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3469
King and Beauregard Intersection Improvements, Phases 1 and 2
Facility: VA 7 King/Bearegard Intersection Improvements
From: 0.05 mi N of Beauregard St
To: 0.19 mi S of Beauregard St.
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $17,900
Agency Proj. ID: 8645 107
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3174
Spring Street Widen 4 to 6 lanes, intersection & ramp impv., sidewalks
Facility: Spring Street
From: Herndon Parkway East
To: Fairfax County Parkway
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $10,500
Agency Proj. ID: 105521
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1952
Sycolin Road
Facility: Sycolin Road
From: VA/US 7/15 Leesburg Bypass
To: SCL of Leesburg
Complete In: 2015
Cost: $13,500
Agency Proj. ID: 78853
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2073
Widen Liberia Avenue
Facility: Liberia Avenue
From: VA 28
To: PW Parkway Rt 294
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $63,000
Agency Proj. ID: 102903
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2876
System MaintenanceUrban Projects
VA 17 Intersection Improvements in Warrenton
Facility: VA 17
From: Frost Avenue south of
To: Winchester Street south of
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $668
Agency Proj. ID: 76408
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3441
Operational ProgramUrban Projects
Seminary Road & Beauregard Street Ellipse
Facility: Seminary Road/ Beauregard St. Intersection
From:
To:
Complete In: 2028
Cost: $35,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3175
OtherUrban Projects
Convert 27th Street South to 2-way
Facility: 27th Street South
From: US 1
To: Crystal Drive
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $1
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3677
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 160
All costs shown in $1,000s
Farrington Aveneue
Facility: New road
From: Van Dorn Street at Eisenhower Avenue
To: Edsall Road
Complete In: 2035
Cost: $30,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3286
Remove South Clark Street
Facility: South Clark Street
From: 12th Street South
To: 18th Street South
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $1
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3678
Wellington Rd. Overpass Phase III
Facility: Wellington Road
From: Dean Drive
To: Dean Park Lane
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $60,000
Agency Proj. ID: 104374
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3402
System ExpansionBike/Ped Projects
Backlick Run Multi-use trail Phase 1
Facility: Backlick Run Multi-use trail
From: From Booth Park Base Ball field
To: Van Dorn St.
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $7,163
Agency Proj. ID: 111469
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3612
Capital Bikeshare
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $750
Agency Proj. ID: 106958
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3614
Four Mile Run Trail expansion
Facility:
From: Route 1
To: Mt Vernon Trail
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $750
Agency Proj. ID: 103595
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3616
Holmes Run Trail Connector
Facility: Holmes Run Trail
From: N. Ripley St.
To: S. Pickett St.
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $1,286
Agency Proj. ID: 111401
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3617
HOT Lanes Bicycle/Pedestrians Facilities Phase II
Facility: I 495
From: Springfield Interchange
To: Old Dominion Drive
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $1,775
Agency Proj. ID: 104005
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3259
Old Cameron Run Trail Construction
Facility: Old Cameron Run Trail
From: Mt. Vernon Trail
To: Eisenhower Ave Trail
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $54
Agency Proj. ID: 855755
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3618
Potomac Yard Trail Expansion
Facility: Potomac Yard Trail
From: E. Glebe Road
To: Four Mile Run
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $736
Agency Proj. ID: 80434
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3624
OtherBike/Ped Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 161
All costs shown in $1,000s
Mt. Vernon Trail at East Abingdon Dr.
Facility: Mt. Vernon Trail at East Abingdon Dr.
From: Between end of Mt. Vernon trail north of Slaters Ln.
To: Norfolk Southern Tracks south of Slaters Ln.
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $540
Agency Proj. ID: 105300
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3623
Project Grouping for Construction: Recreational Trails
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $6,712
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3498
System ExpansionBridge Projects
Frontier Drive Extension plus Braided Ramps
Facility: VA 2677 Frontier Drive
From: Franconia -Springfield Transportation Center
To: VA 789 Loisdale Road
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $84,500
Agency Proj. ID: 106742
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3460
Rock Hill Road Overpass
Facility:
From: 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive
To: 209 Innovation Avenue
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $82,696
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3609
South Lakes Drive 4-Lane Overpass
Facility: VA 5329 South Lakes Drive
From: VA 5320 Sunrise Valley Drive
To: VA 675 Sunset Hills Road
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3451
System MaintenanceBridge Projects
Project Grouping: Construction: Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement/Reconstruction
Facility: NoVA District Bridges
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $116,483
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2693
TIP Grouping for Preventive Maintenance for Bridges
Facility: Bridges
From: NoVA District
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $148,783
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2699
StudyBridge Projects
Rockhills 4-lane Overpass
Facility:
From: VA 605 Sunrise Valley Drive
To: VA 868 Davis Drive Extension
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3449
OtherBridge Projects
Multimodal Bridge to Van Dorn Metro Station
Facility:
From: Eisenhower Avenue
To: S. Pickett Street
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $40,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3284
System ExpansionEnhancement Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 162
All costs shown in $1,000s
VA 294 Prince William Pkwy Interchange at Smoketown Road
Facility: VA 294 Prince William Parkway
From:
To:
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $100,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3670
System MaintenanceEnhancement Projects
Colechester Road (paving dirt road)
Facility: VA 612 Colchester Road
From: VA 641 Chapel Road
To: VA 641 0.24 mile northwest of VA 641
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $445
Agency Proj. ID: 76256
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3385
OtherEnhancement Projects
TIP Grouping project for Construction: Transportation Enhancement Byway Non-Traditional
Facility: Enhancement projects
From: NoVA District
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $667,918
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2697
Operational ProgramITS Projects
ITS Integration Phase IV
Facility: City-wide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $1,918
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3610
TIP Grouping project for Maintenance: Traffic and Safety Operations
Facility: Traffic and Safety Operations
From: NoVA District
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $460,491
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2700
Traffic Adaptive Signal Control Fiber Optic
Facility: City-wide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $7,676
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3611
StudyOther Projects
Embark Richmond Highway (Study)
Facility: US 1 Richmond Highway
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $800
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3541
Evaluation of Significant Projects that can ease Congestion
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $600
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3148
Washington, D.C. to Richmond Southeast High Speed Rail (DC2RVA) Project
Facility: RF&P Subdivision, CSX Transportation System
From: CF 110 CSX Long Bridge, Arlington County
To: CF Junction of North End and Bellwood Subdivisions, CSX Transportation System (Centr
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $55,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3628
Operational ProgramOther Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 163
All costs shown in $1,000s
BRAC/Economic Development
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $3,316
Agency Proj. ID: 81738
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2431
Next Generation Fare Collection & Technology
Facility: City-wide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $1,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3622
TIP Grouping project for Construction: Safety/ITS/Operational Improvements
Facility: Safety/ITS/Operational Facilities
From: District-wide
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $2,478,654
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2695
OtherOther Projects
Virginia Statewide Vehicle Fuel Conversion Program
Facility: Statewide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $25,740
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3139
OtherCMAQ Projects
BUS REPLACEMENT (OMNIRIDE EXPRESS COMMUTER BUSES)
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $11,978
Agency Proj. ID: T21459
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3685
COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $34,533
Agency Proj. ID: T21240
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3682
FAIRFAX COUNTYWIDE TRANSIT STORES
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $3,760
Agency Proj. ID: T21448
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3683
PRTC COMMUTER ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $2,050
Agency Proj. ID: T21457
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3684
TRANSIT STORE FUNDING - Alexandria
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $1
Agency Proj. ID: T21453
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3681
WMATA REPLACEMENT BUSES
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $3,700
Agency Proj. ID: T21033
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3686
OtherFederal Lands Highway Pro
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 164
All costs shown in $1,000s
Project Grouping:Construction : Federal Lands Highway
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $250
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3494
System MaintenanceMaintenance Projects
TIP Grouping project for Preventive Maintenance and System Preservation
Facility: Preventive Maintenance and System Preservation Facilities
From: NoVA District
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,006,098
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2698
System ExpansionTransit Projects
Arkendale to Powell’s Creek Third Track Project and Potomac Shores Station
Facility: Third Track
From: CFP 72 Arkendale, Stafford County VA
To: CFP 83.4 Powell's Creek, Prince William VA
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $26,559
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2831
Ballston Multimodal Improvements
Facility: Ballston Metro Station
From: Fairfax Drive at Stuart Street
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $4,843
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3660
Ballston-MU Metro Station West Entrance
Facility: Ballston Metro station
From:
To: Fairfax Drive at N Vermont Street
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $104,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3633
Citywide Bus Shelters
Facility: Citywide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $2,200
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3613
Crystal City Potomac Yard BRT Expansion
Facility: Portion of Route 1, Evans Lane, and Potomac Avenue
From: E. Glebe Road
To: S. Glebe Road (Arlington)
Complete In: 2040
Cost: $1,205
Agency Proj. ID: T1117
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3615
Crystal City Potomac Yard Transitway Northern Extension
Facility: Crystal City Transitway
From: Crystal City Metro Station
To: Pentagon City Metro Station
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $24,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3521
DASH Facility & Fleet Expansion Project
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $11,134
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3620
Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project
Facility:
From: East Falls Church Metrorail Station
To: VA Loudoun County)
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $2,937,421
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1981
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 165
All costs shown in $1,000s
Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project Phase II
Facility: VA 267 Dulles Toll Road
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $20,160
Agency Proj. ID: 97226
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2982
Fairfax Connector Bus Service Expansion
Facility: Fairfax Connector Bus Service Expansion
From: Countywide
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2673
Herndon Metrorail Intermodal Access Improvements
Facility: VA Herndon Parkway
From: VA 666 Van Buren Street (East of)
To: VA Spring Street (West of )
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $1,600
Agency Proj. ID: 104328 or
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3166
Landmark Transit Center
Facility: Landmark Transit Center
From: Van Dorn St.
To: DUke Street
Complete In: 2032
Cost: $25,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3071
PRTC - Bus Acquisition / Replacement Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $126,583
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2172
TIP Grouping project for Construction: Rail
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $7,707
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2694
US 1 Bus Rapid Transit
Facility: US 1 Richmond Highway BRT
From: N. Kings Highway at Huntington Metro
To: Fort Belvoir
Complete In: 2030
Cost: $504,900
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3496
VRE - Rolling Stock Acquisition
Facility: VRE Systemwide
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $662,155
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2163
VRE Service Improvements (Reduce Headways)
Facility: Fredericksburg and Manassas lines
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $105,013
Agency Proj. ID: 113526
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2832
West End Transitway
Facility: Van Dorn Metrorail Station
From: Van Dorn Metrorail Station
To: Pentagon Metrorail Station
Complete In: 2024
Cost: $140,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2930
System MaintenanceTransit Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 166
All costs shown in $1,000s
Eisenhower Metrorail Station
Facility: Eisenhower Ave. and Swamp Fox Rd
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $8,500
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3134
PRTC - Captial Cost of Contracting
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $87,912
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2747
PRTC - Rehabilitate / Rebuild OmniRide Buses
Facility: OmniRide Buses
From: Prince William County
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $106,985
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2714
VRE - Stations and Facilities
Facility:
From: Systemwide
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $650,002
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2164
VRE - Tracks and Storage Yards
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,324,447
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1996
VRE Track Lease Improvements
Facility: VRE Tracks
From: Systemwide
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $685,430
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2684
StudyTransit Projects
Duke Street BRT Design & Construction
Facility: Duke Street BRT
From: King Street Metro Station
To: Landmark (Possibly CIty of Fairfax)
Complete In: 2027
Cost: $19,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2932
VRE Grant and Project Management
Facility:
From: Systemwide
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $17,550
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1908
Operational ProgramTransit Projects
CSX RF &P Rail Corridor Third Track
Facility:
From: CF 577 Hamilton Interlocking (HA), Spotsylvania
To: CF 1063 Slaters Lane Interlocking, Alexandria
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $104,160
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3016
DASH Real-Time Information Enhancement Project
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $610
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3619
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 167
All costs shown in $1,000s
Dulles Town Center Park and Ride Lot
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $5,250
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3361
Franconia-Springfield Parkway Park-and-Ride Lots
Facility:
From: Franconia-Springfield Pkwy, west of I-95
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $8,875
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1977
Loudoun County Park and Ride Lots, Construct
Facility: Lowes Island
From:
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $280
Agency Proj. ID: 79679
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1960
One Loudoun Park and Ride Lot
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $3,500
Agency Proj. ID: 111470
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3358
Park and Ride Lot at Arcola Center
Facility: Park and Ride Lot
From: Arcola Center
To:
Complete In: 2025
Cost: $5,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2874
Project Grouping :Transit: Ridesharing
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2944
PRTC Western Facility
Facility: Western PWC
From:
To:
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $47,667
Agency Proj. ID: T20924
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2320
Sterling Park and Ride Lot
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2014
Cost: $100
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3357
Transit Signal Priority on Route 7 and Route 236
Facility: Rt King Street/Duke Street
From: City Line
To: Quaker Ln/Diagonal Rd
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $1,505
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3621
Western Loudoun Park and Ride Lot
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $3,575
Agency Proj. ID: 111470
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3359
OtherTransit Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 168
All costs shown in $1,000s
Columbia Pike Transit Stations
Facility: Columbia Pike
From:
To:
Complete In: 2021
Cost: $13,323
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3659
East Falls Church Metro Station Bus Bay Expansion
Facility: East Falls Church Metro station
From:
To: North side bus bays
Complete In: 2018
Cost: $6,328
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3650
Mark Center
Facility: Mark Center
From: Mark Center Drive
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $4,000
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3625
PRTC Bus Shelter Programs
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2019
Cost: $54
Agency Proj. ID: PRTC0001
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=1932
PRTC Security Enhancements
Facility: PRTC Transit Center
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $623
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2805
Springfield Commuter Parking Garage
Facility:
From: Springfield CBD &
To: Engineering Proving Grounds (EPG)
Complete In: 2020
Cost: $63,800
Agency Proj. ID: 106274
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2188
TIP Grouping for Transit Vehicles
Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Vehicles
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $300,007
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2900
TIP Grouping project for Transit Access
Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Access
From: District-wide
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $308,438
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2711
TIP Grouping project for Transit Amenities
Facility: TIP Grouping project for Transit Amenities
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $20,593
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2712
System ExpansionSafety Projects
Army Navy Country Club Emergency Access Drive
Facility: new access drive
From: Memorial Drive at Army Navy Drive
To: South Queen Street
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $5,150
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3649
Operational ProgramSafety Projects
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 169
All costs shown in $1,000s
Elk Lick Road Intersection Improvements
Facility: VA 621 Elk Lick Drive
From: US 50 John Mosby Highway
To: VA 2200 Tall Cedars Parkway
Complete In: 2023
Cost: $1,654
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3600
Evergreen Mills Road Realignments - Reservoir Road & Watson Road
Facility: VA 621 Evergreen Mills Road
From: VA 860 Watson Road
To: VA 861 Reservoir Road
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $3,815
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3601
Route 50/ Everfield Drive Roundabout
Facility: US 50 John Mosby Highway
From: Everfield Drive
To:
Complete In: 2022
Cost: $7,975
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3603
Region-wideTPB
StudyBike/Ped Projects
Transportation, Community, and System Preservation (TCSP) Program
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost:
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3138
Operational ProgramHuman Service Transportat
Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $0
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=3409
JARC and New Freedom Programs
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost:
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2612
OtherTransit Projects
TIGER – Priority Bus Transit in the National Capital Region
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In:
Cost: $10,062
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2882
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
System MaintenanceTransit Projects
Maintenance Equipment
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $128,329
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2896
Maintenance Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $5,738,260
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2779
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 170
All costs shown in $1,000s
Other Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $1,401,401
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2781
Passenger Facilities
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $10,923,385
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2782
Project Management and Support
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $691,628
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=874
Rail System Infrastructure Rehabilitation
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $7,995,712
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2881
Systems and Technology
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $4,341,798
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2897
Track & Structures
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $8,788,070
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2787
Vehicles/ Vehicle Parts
Facility:
From:
To:
Complete In: 2045
Cost: $17,667,659
Agency Proj. ID:
CEID:http://www1.mwcog.org/clrp/projects/clrp-report.asp?PROJECT_ID=2894
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 171
Technical Inputs Solicitation
for the Constrained Element and Air Quality Conformity Analysis of the Visualize 2045 Long-Range Transportation Plan
for the National Capital Region
Submission Guidefor Implementing Agencies
Inputs are due November 15, 2017
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 172
VISUALIZE 2045 TECHNICAL INPUTS SOLICITATIONSubmission Guide for Implementing Agencies
Approved October 18, 2017
ABOUT THE TPBThe National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (TPB) is the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for metropolitan Washington. It is responsible for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in the metropolitan area. Members of the TPB include representatives of the transportation agencies of the states of Maryland and Virginia and the District of Columbia, 24 local governments, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the Maryland and Virginia General Assemblies, and nonvoting members from the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority and federal agencies. The TPB is staffed by the Department of Transportation Planning at the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG).
CREDITS Editor: Benjamin HamptonContributing Editors: Andrew Austin, Jane Posey, Lyn EricksonDesign: Remline Corp.
ACCOMMODATIONS POLICYAlternative formats of this document are available upon request. Visit www.mwcog.org/accommodations or call (202) 962-3300 or (202) 962-3213 (TDD).
TITLE VI NONDISCRIMINATION POLICYThe Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations prohibiting discrimination in all programs and activities. For more information, to file a Title VI related complaint, or to obtain information in another language, visit www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination or call (202) 962-3300.
El Consejo de Gobiernos del Área Metropolitana de Washington (COG) cumple con el Título VI de la Ley sobre los Derechos Civiles de 1964 y otras leyes y reglamentos en todos sus programas y actividades. Para obtener más información, someter un pleito relacionado al Título VI, u obtener información en otro idioma, visite www.mwcog.org/nondiscrimination o llame al (202) 962-3300.
Copyright © 2017 by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs SolicitationAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element |173 171
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction .........................................................................................1
Solicitation Schedule ..........................................................................2
Responsible Agencies ..........................................................................3
Project, Program, and Policy Inputs ...................................................4
Financial Inputs ....................................................................................4
Additional Inputs .................................................................................6
Regional Policy Considerations and Evaluation ...............................6
Federal Requirements and Policy Considerations ............................8
Review, Comment, and Approval Process .........................................9
Basic Submission Instructions for Conformity Inputs ................... 10
Resources and Maps ......................................................................... 10
Contact Information .......................................................................... 10
APPENDIX A: Detailed Submission Instructions and Sample
Description Form ...................................................................... A-1
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 174
Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation
7
267
28
85
15
26
194
27
12497
20028
355
295197
450
2024
5
223
210
5225
294
234
286
123
608
28
234
7
75
50
1
29
50
301
1
29
340
40
29
50
15
15
301
66395
495
295
95
95
270
70
495
9566
695
370
Dulles
DCADCA
BWI
Frederick County
Frederick County
Prince WilliamCounty
Prince WilliamCounty
Prince George’sCounty
Prince George’sCounty
CharlesCountyCharlesCounty
Loudoun County
Loudoun County
FairfaxCountyFairfaxCounty
Montgomery County
Montgomery County
ArlingtonCounty
Arlington County
FauquierCounty
Urbanized Area
FauquierCounty
Urbanized Area
ManassasManassas
ManassasPark
ManassasPark
AlexandriaAlexandria
BowieBowie
CollegePark
CollegePark
GreenbeltGreenbeltTakomaPark
TakomaPark
RockvilleRockville
GaithersburgGaithersburg
FrederickFrederick
Fairfax CityFairfax City
Falls Church
LaurelLaurel
ClarkCounty
JeffersonCounty
WashingtonCounty
King GeorgeCounty
St. Mary’s County
AnneArundelCounty
HowardCounty
CarollCounty
CulpeperCounty
SpotsylvaniaCounty
BaltimoreCounty
City of Baltimore
StaffordCountyStaffordCounty
CalvertCountyCalvertCounty
York County
Adams County
FranklinCounty
MARYLAND
VIRGINIA
DC
WESTVIRGINIA
PENNSYLVANIA
P o t o m a c R i v e r
Major Highway
Other Major Roadway
Passenger & Freight Rail Line
MetroRail Lines
Major Airport
Transportation System
Adminstrative Boundaries
State Borders
County & City Lines
TPB Planning Area 5 10 200Miles N
The National Capital Region, as defined by the federal government for the purposes of metropolitan transportation planning, includes the District of Columbia and 22 surrounding counties and cities in Suburban Maryland and Northern Virginia. It encompasses more than 3,500 square miles and a great diversity of development patterns, transportation needs, and economic interests. The region is home to 5.5 million people and 3.2 million jobs.
National Capital Region
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 175
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 1
INTRODUCTIONAbout Visualize 2045Visualize 2045 is the federally required four-year update of the National Capital Region’s long-range transportation plan. It will identify all regionally significant transportation investments planned through 2045 and provide detailed analyses to help decision makers and the public “visualize” the region’s future under current plans.
Visualize 2045 will include both a “Constrained Element” and an “Unconstrained Element.” The Constrained Element will identify the investments agencies expect to be able to afford between now and 2045, while the Unconstrained Element will identify projects that appear in local, state, and regional plans but for which funding has not yet been identified. The Constrained Element is the portion of the plan that was previously known as the Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP). The most recent CLRP was adopted by the TPB in 2014 and amended in 2016.
Like the CLRP had in the past, the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045 will undergo federally required analyses to ensure that it supports the region’s air-quality improvement goals (this is known as Air Quality Conformity) and that sufficient financial resources will be available to implement the projects and programs in it (this is known as Constraint). The TPB will also analyze the future performance of the planned system and assess how well it supports or advances regional goals and priorities.
Technical Inputs SolicitationThe Technical Inputs Solicitation is a formal call for area transportation agencies to submit many of the technical elements that will make up Visualize 2045, including those necessary to perform the required air quality and financial analyses of the Constrained Element. The inputs will also be used to assess the future performance of the planned transportation system.
These analyses take several months to complete. Therefore, the technical inputs must be submitted by November 15, 2017 to ensure that the analyses can be completed and the plan adopted by October 2018.
What’s RequiredTo properly analyze the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045, the TPB must know what regionally significant projects, programs, and policies agencies are planning to implement between now and 2045. Agencies must undertake the following as part of the Technical Inputs Solicitation:
1. Review and update existing projects,programs, and policies
2. Add new projects, programs, and policies
3. Submit updated revenue and expenditureestimates
The following broad categories of inputs are anticipated as part of this Technical Inputs Solicitation:
• Capacity expansion projects
• Operations and maintenance programs
• Transit service and fare assumptions
For each submission, agencies must provide certain project details, including project descriptions, cost and revenue estimates in year of expenditure dollars, and completion dates. Agencies must also identify and describe what federal and regional policy considerations the investments address.
In addition to the transportation projects, programs, and policies called for in this solicitation, the TPB will also be gathering other technical inputs necessary for the analyses, such as updated population, household, and job growth forecasts, and information about the region’s fleet of passenger and commercial vehicles. These inputs are also essential to forecast future travel patterns and vehicle-based emissions under the plan.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 176
2 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation
SOLICITATION SCHEDULEThe technical analyses of Visualize 2045 will take several months to complete. To ensure that the analyses are finished in time for the full plan to be adopted by the TPB in October 2018, agencies must submit these technical inputs by November 15, 2017.
A 30-day comment period will provide an opportunity for TPB members, stakeholders, and the public to comment on the projects, programs, policies, and technical assumptions submitted for use in the technical analyses of the plan.
Summer 2017 Staff development of solicitation; initial request for project/program and financial information underway
September 2017 Committee and board review of draft solicitation
October 18, 2017 Solicitation opens, pending board approval
November 15, 2017 Solicitation closes; all inputs are due
December 2017 Committee and board review of draft technical inputs
December 14, 2017 - January 13, 2018 30-day comment period on draft technical inputs
January 17, 2018 Board approval of technical inputs
March 2, 2018 Congestion Management Documentation and FY 2019-2024 TIP Inputs are due
May 10, 2018 Public Forum on the FY 2019-2024 TIP
June/July Staff completes draft Visualize 2045 plan, containing all elements for committee review
September 2018 Committee and board review of Visualize 2045 plan, TIP, and analyses
September 13 - October 13, 2018 30 day comment period on projects, Visualize 2045 plan, TIP, and analyses
October 17, 2018 TPB reviews comments and responses, presented with draft Visualize 2045 plan, Conformity Analysis, and TIP for approval.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 177
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 3
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIESAny municipal, county, state, regional, or federal agency with the fiscal authority to fund transportation projects
is responsible for providing required project, program, and policy inputs for the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045. Inputs must be submitted by one of the TPB member jurisdictions or agencies listed below.
District of ColumbiaDistrict Department of Transportation (DDOT)
Suburban MarylandMaryland Department of Transportation (MDOT)
State Highway Administration (MDOT SHA)Maryland Transit Administration (MTA)Maryland Transportation Authority (MDTA)
Charles County Department of Public WorksFrederick County Department of Public WorksMontgomery County Department of TransportationPrince George’s County Department of Public Works and TransportationMaryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NNCPPC)City of Frederick Planning DepartmentGaithersburg Public Works DepartmentRockville Public Works DepartmentTakoma Park Public Works Department
Northern VirginiaVirginia Department of Transportation (VDOT)Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT)Virginia Railway Express (VRE)Potomac and Rappahannock Transportation Commission (PRTC)Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA)Northern Virginia Transportation Commission (NVTC)Arlington County Department of Environmental Services*Fairfax County Department of Transportation*Fauquier County Department of Community Development*Loudoun County Department of Transportation and Capital Infrastructure*Prince William County Department of Transportation*City of Alexandria Department of Transportation and Environmental Services*City of Fairfax Department of Public Works*City of Falls Church Department of Public Works*City of Manassas Public Works Department*City of Manassas Park Public Works Department**Virginia local jurisdictions submit through VDOT but are stillresponsible for providing required information
RegionalWashington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)Eastern Federal Lands Highway DivisionMetropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA)
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 178
4 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation
PROJECT, PROGRAM, AND POLICY INPUTSTo properly analyze the Constrained Element of Visualize 2045, the TPB must know what projects, programs, and policies agencies are planning to implement between now and 2045. Agencies must undertake the following activities as part of the Technical Inputs Solicitation:
• Review and update existing projects,programs, and policies:Agencies must review all projects, programs, andpolicies in the most recently adopted CLRP andupdate all project information, including projectcosts.
• Add new projects, programs, and policies:Agencies must submit any project, program,or policy not already in the plan that is deemed“regionally significant” as outlined below.
• Submit updated revenue and expenditureestimates:Agencies must submit updated revenue forecastsand estimated expenditure information for theyears 2019-2045 to enable the fiscal constraintanalysis to be performed.
The following broad categories of inputs are required as part of this Technical Inputs Solicitation:
• Capacity expansion projects: Projects that add orremove capacity on the existing highway or transitsystem
• Operations and maintenance programs: New orupdated operations and maintenance programs orupdated cost figures for such programs
• Transit service and fare assumptions: New orupdated route, frequency, and fare information forexisting or planned transit services
For each submission, agencies must provide certain project details, including project descriptions, cost and revenue estimates in year of expenditure dollars, and completion dates. Agencies must also identify and describe what federal and regional policy considerations the investments address.
FINANCIAL INPUTSFederal metropolitan planning regulations require MPOs to develop a financial plan that demonstrates how the adopted long-range transportation plan could be implemented given revenues that are “reasonably expected to be available.” “Financial constraint” or “fiscal constraint” is the analysis performed to demonstrate that the forecast revenues which are reasonably expected to be available through 2045 are able to cover the estimated costs of adequately maintaining, operating, and expanding the highway and transit system in the region through that same timeframe. This analysis will be included in the Financial Element of Visualize 2045.
Currently, an interim financial analysis is being prepared to provide a baseline of anticipated revenues and existing planned expenditures. That analysis is based on projects and programs in the adopted FY2017-2022 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), the 2016 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan (CLRP), and the existing Air Quality Conformity Inputs table for both the CLRP and TIP. The inputs provided by the implementing agencies in response to this Technical Inputs Solicitation and for conformity should start from this baseline and adjust their revenues and expenditures to then enable staff to determine financial constraint. The Financial Element will then be finalized as part of the Visualize 2045 long-range plan when submitted for approval by the TPB in October 2018.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 179
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 5
Roadway Projects
• System Expansion: Increasing systemcapacity by increasing the number oflane-miles of roadway
• System Preservation/State of Good Repair:Major rehabilitation or complete replacementof aging roadways, bridges, technologyand communications systems, and otherinfrastructure as it nears the end of itsuseful lifespan
• Study: Any project that does not have fundingidentified for right-of-way acquisition orconstruction. The study may include multipledesign alternatives. Funding in the TIP ispermitted for project planning or preliminaryengineering only
Transit Projects
• System Expansion: Increasing system capacityby building new transit lines or adding service toexisting lines
• System Preservation/State of Good Repair:Major rehabilitation or complete replacementof aging railcars, buses, rail track, stops andstations, and other infrastructure as it nears theend of its useful lifespan
• Study: Any project that does not have fundingidentified for right-of-way acquisition orconstruction. The study may include multipledesign alternatives. Funding in the TIP ispermitted for project planning or preliminaryengineering only
Bicycle or Pedestrian Projects
• Local Circulation: Projects that support localcirculation within Activity Centers. These caninclude streetscaping, traffic calming, bikeshare,bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths
• Regional Facilities: Multi-jurisdictional projects,projects that improve transit station access, and/or projects that are part of the National CapitalTrail network
Operations and Maintenance Programs
• Day-to-Day Operations and Maintenance: Thiscan include activities like repaving roadways,inspecting and maintaining bridges, clearingsnow and debris, servicing transit vehicles,maintaining and operating traffic signals, andpaying train and bus operators
• Regional programs: This can include programslike regional ridesharing and traveler informationprograms
Transit Service and Fare Assumptions
• Bus transit: New or updated routes, frequencies,and/or fare policies
• Rail transit: New or updated routes, frequencies,and/or fare policies
• HOV/HOT: New or updated lane restrictions and/or hours of operation
Technical Conformity Input CategoriesVisualize 2045 can include any kind of project or program. However, some projects and programs must be included. Per federal requirements, any project that adds roadway or transit capacity—and could therefore affect air quality—must be included, as must any project or program slated to receive federal funding. The plan must also identify the maintenance and operations programs and funding required to keep the system in a state of good repair. Plan inputs typically fall into one of the following categories:
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 180
ADDITIONAL INPUTSOther inputs that are required in order to perform the Air Quality Conformity Analysis include the following, which are gathered by staff with help from local, state, and other agencies and are not directly required as part of this solicitation:
• Baltimore area project inputs: Projects in theBaltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB)long-range transportation plan that are injurisdictions in the TPB Modeled Area.
• Fredericksburg area project inputs: Projects inthe Fredericksburg Area Metropolitan PlanningOrganization (FAMPO) long-range transportationplan that are in jurisdictions in the TPB Modeled Area.
• Calvert-St. Mary’s area project inputs:Projects in the Calvert-St. Mary’s MetropolitanPlanning Organization (C-SMMPO) long-rangetransportation plan that are in jurisdictions in theTPB Modeled Area.
• Land-use forecasts for neighboring areas:Population and employment forecasts forjurisdictions outside the TPB Planning Area but withinthe TPB Modeled Area, including the Baltimore,Fredericksburg, and Calvert-St. Mary’s metropolitanareas and Charles County (MD), Clark and Fauquiercounties (VA), and Jefferson County (WV).
• Census-adjusted employment forecasts:Employment forecasts provided by COG aremodified to reflect the latest Census estimates.
• Other specialized trips: Estimates of external trips,through trips, and specialty-generator trips (e.g.,for major sporting events).
• Vehicle registration information: Make, model, andyear of all registered vehicles, used to calculate theaverage fuel efficiency of the region’s vehicle fleet.
• Non-travel related emissions model inputs:Air temperature and humidity, fuel formulation,and inspection and maintenance program andrequirement information.
• Base-year transit assumptions: Route and scheduleinformation for existing train and bus systems.
• Toll and fare updates: Existing toll and fare policiesand usage, including toll collection methods, facilityuse by vehicle type, and hours of operation andenforcement.
REGIONAL POLICY CONSIDERATIONS AND EVALUATIONVisualize 2045 should strive and aspire to meet the goals and reflect the priorities developed and agreed to by the TPB and its member jurisdictions. To that end, the TPB asks agencies and jurisdictions to “think regionally” as they “act locally” to develop transportation projects, programs, and policies for implementation. This means considering the needs of neighboring jurisdictions and the region as a whole when identifying investment priorities—recognizing that decisions made in one jurisdiction can affect travelers and transportation systems and services elsewhere in the region.
The region’s leaders have come together around a shared vision for the region’s transportation future. That vision focuses on multimodal transportation solutions that give people greater choice in finding the travel mode that works best for them. It also emphasizes the important role of land-use, especially strengthening the region’s Activity Centers by providing high-quality connections between centers and improving non-auto travel options within them. System maintenance is also paramount, recognizing that our existing roadways and transit systems must be in a state of good repair to be safe, efficient, and reliable.
When agencies submit new projects or programs for inclusion in Visualize 2045, they will be asked to document how the initiative supports or advances regional goals and priorities. This information will be shared with the TPB, its committees and subcommittees, and the general public for review and discussion at key points in the plan development process.
Note for agencies: The Visualize 2045 Project Description Form asks for information about how project submissions support or advance regional goals and priorities. These questions must be completed for all new submissions.
6 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs SolicitationAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 181
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 7
Shared Regional Goals and PrioritiesThe six goals below were outlined in the Regional Transportation Priorities Plan, adopted by the TPB in 2014. The goals are rooted in the TPB Vision, which was adopted by the TPB in 1998 and serves as the official policy element of Visualize 2045. When agencies submit new projects or programs for inclusion in Visualize 2045, they will be asked to document how the initiatives support or advance these regional goals.
Provide a Comprehensive Range of Travel Options
• Identify all travel mode options that this project provides, enhances, supports orpromotes
• Does this project improve accessibility for historically transportation-disadvantaged individuals (i.e., persons with disabilities, low incomes,and/or limited English proficiency)?
Promote Regional Activity Centers
• Does this project begin or end in an Activity Center?
• Does this project connect two or more Activity Centers?
• Does this project promote non-auto travel within one or moreActivity Centers?
Ensure System Maintenance, Preservation, and Safety
• Does this project contribute to enhanced system maintenance, preservation, orsafety?
Maximize Operational Effectiveness and Safety
• Is this project primarily designed to reduce travel time on highways and/or transitwithout building new capacity (e.g., ITS, bus priority treatments, etc.)?
• Does this project enhance safety for motorists, transit users, pedestrians, and/orbicyclists?
Protect and Enhance the Natural Environment
• Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of criteriapollutants?
• Is this project expected to contribute to reductions in emissions of greenhousegases?
Support Interregional and International Travel and
Commerce
• Does this project enhance, support, or promote the following freight carrier modes:long-haul truck, local delivery, rail, or air freight carrier modes?
• Does this project enhance, support, or promote the following passenger carriermodes: air, Amtrak intercity passenger rail, intercity bus?
Note: Several TPB and COG policy documents together articulate the region’s shared vision for the future. Refer to the Resources and Maps section for links to these resources online.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 182
8 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONSVisualize 2045 must satisfy a number of federal requirements in order to receive federal approval and for federal funding to flow to transportation projects in our region. The two main requirements are that the plan must:
• Identify all regionally significant projects andprograms for which funding is reasonablyexpected to be available between now and 2045.Regionally significant projects and programs arethose that add or remove capacity on the existingtransportation system.
• Demonstrate that these projects and programstogether support regional air-quality improvementgoals. An official Air Quality Conformity Analysiscarried out by the TPB must show that forecastvehicle-related emissions under the plan will notexceed approved regional limits.
Under federal law, the plan must also address eight federal planning factors, as identified by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT). (See sidebar)The Constrained Element of Visualize 2045 must meet a number of other federal requirements as well, including non-discrimination and equity, congestion management documentation, public participation, and others. For a full listing of these requirements, refer to the Resources and Maps section of this document.
Performance-Based Planning and ProgrammingThe Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act put forth seven National Goals for Performance-Based Planning and Programming:
1. Safety
2. Infrastructure Condition
3. Congestion Reduction
4. System Reliability
5. Freight Movement and Economic Vitality
6. Environmental Sustainability
7. Reduced Project Delivery Delays
These goals mirror the goals in the TPB Vision and other regional policy documents. The FY 2019-2024 TIP will be used as a tool to monitor and review the region’s performance relative to these goals.
Project and program submissions must:
• Include sufficient detail to be analyzed for air quality impacts and fiscal constraint: The ProjectDescription Form notes all required project details and descriptions.
• Address one or more federal planning factors: Agencies will be asked in the Project SubmissionForm to note which federal planning factors the project or program addresses.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 183
Submission Guide for Implementing Agencies 9
1. Support the economic vitality of themetropolitan area, especially by enabling globalcompetitiveness, productivity, and efficiency;
2. Increase the safety of the transportation systemfor all motorized and non-motorized users;
3. Increase the ability of the transportation systemto support homeland security and to safeguardthe personal security of all motorized andnon-motorized users;
4. Increase accessibility and mobility of peopleand freight;
5. Protect and enhance the environment, promoteenergy conservation, improve the qualityof life, and promote consistency betweentransportation improvements and Stateand local planned growth and economicdevelopment patterns;
6. Enhance the integration and connectivity ofthe transportation system, across and betweenmodes, for people and freight;
7. Promote efficient system management andoperation;
8. Emphasize the preservation of the existingtransportation system;
9. Improve resiliency and reliability of thetransportation system and reduce or mitigatestormwater impacts of surface transportation(New under the FAST Act); and
10. Enhance travel and tourism. (New under theFAST Act)
Federal Planning FactorsFederal law also identifies a list of planning factors meant to guide metropolitan transportation planning. Collectively, the projects, programs, and policies in Visualize 2045 must address these factors. Agencies will therefore be asked to identify which of the federal planning factors their submissions address.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 184
10 Visualize 2045 Technical Inputs Solicitation
Purpose of Committee and Board ReviewIt is TPB’s responsibility to approve project, program, and policy submissions for inclusion in the long-range plan. These initiatives have typically undergone extensive local development and review, however, the TPB and its committees play an important review role. Their tasks are to:
• Become acquainted with project and program details
• Ensure key questions are answered and details are provided
• Ensure consistency with locally adopted plans and priorities
• Ensure that sufficient local input from the public and local officials has been provided
• Discuss whether and how submissions support regional policy goals and priorities
The TPB will vote on aspects of Visualize 2045 at two key points in the plan development process. The first will come in January 2018, when the board will be asked to approve the technical inputs. The board will vote again in October 2018 on final adoption of the full plan.
REVIEW, COMMENT, AND APPROVAL PROCESSThe draft technical inputs will undergo a process of review, comment, and approval before they are used in the federally required Air Quality Conformity Analysis and other analyses of the plan. The steps of this process are outlined below.
Staff Review November 2017
Staff will review the draft inputs and work with submitting agencies to ensure that all provided information is complete and accurate.
Committee and Board Review
December 2017
The TPB and the TPB Technical Committee will review the draft inputs at their December meetings. Other committees and sub-committees may request a briefing on the draft inputs.
Comment Period December 2017 -
January 2018
A 30-day comment period will provide an official opportunity for TPB members, stakehold-ers, and the public to comment on the draft inputs. Comments must be provided through official channels described at mwcog.org/TPBcomment.
Review of Comments and Board Approval
January 2018
The TPB and TPB Technical Committee will review comments on the draft inputs. The board will vote at its January meeting to approve the inputs for use in the federally required Air Quality Conformity and other analyses of the plan.
Appendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 185
BASIC SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONFORMITY INPUTSAn online database application is used to gather project and program information from each agency. Staff from implementing agencies will be assigned an account with a user name and password. There are two levels of access to the database: editors and reviewers. Each agency should decide which person on their staff should assume these roles. Once logged into the application users will have access to the most recent version of the plan and TIP information that was approved by the TPB. TPB staff will offer training sessions to assist staff with the application as needed.
Appendix A provides details instructions for project and program submissions.
RESOURCES AND MAPSThe following resources and maps may be helpful for agencies and jurisdictions as they report on how their technical submissions support or advance regional goals and priorities.
TPB Vision www.mwcog.org/TPBvision
Regional Transportation Priorities Plan www.mwcog.org/RTPP
Activity Centers map and list www.mwcog.org/ActivityCenters
Equity Emphasis Areas map www.mwcog.org/EquityEmphasisAreas
Region Forward www.mwcog.org/RegionForward
Financial Analysis (2014 CLRP) www1.mwcog.org/clrp/elements/financial/default.asp
Federal requirements www1.mwcog.org/clrp/process/federalrequirements.asp
CONTACT INFORMATION
Technical questions and assistance with submissions: Andrew Austin | [email protected] | (202) 962-3353
Questions about transit assumptions and air quality conformity: Jane Posey | [email protected] | (202) 962-3331
All other questions about Visualize 2045: Lyn Erickson | [email protected] | (202) 962-3319
Submission Guide for Implementing AgenciesAppendix B - Summary of Projects in the Financially Constrained Element | 186