summary of pmhp performance improvement projects validation findings
DESCRIPTION
Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings. Friday, March 25, 2011 3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Presenter: Donald Grostic, MS Associate Director, State & Corporate Services. Presentation Overview. 2010–2011 PIP Validation Process Validation Findings - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Page 1
Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings
Presenter: Donald Grostic, MSAssociate Director, State & Corporate Services
Friday, March 25, 2011
3:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.
![Page 2: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Page 2
Presentation Overview
• 2010–2011 PIP Validation Process• Validation Findings• Study Indicator Results• Collaborative Validation Findings• Collaborative Study Indicator Results• Next Steps
![Page 3: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Page 3
2010–2011 PIP Validation Process
• “Statement of Intent” was completed by each MCO type and submitted to HSAG.
• For 2010–2011, MCOs were to submit to HSAG two PIPs for validation:– Clinical and nonclinical– Collaborative topic and one other
![Page 4: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Page 4
2010–2011 PIP Process (cont.)
• HSAG selected two PIPs.• One ongoing and one collaborative PIP were
chosen.• PIPs selected were chosen based on HSAG’s
selection criteria.– If a PMHP did not have a nonclinical study in
process and only had clinical studies, then two clinical PIPs were selected for this year’s validation cycle.
![Page 5: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Page 5
Overall PIP Validation Performance
2009–2010 2010–2011
![Page 6: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Page 6
Trending of PIP Validation Scores
% Score of Evaluation
Elements Met
2006–2007
2007–2008
2008–2009
2009–2010
2010-2011
90% to 100% 0 14 18 1 2
80% to 89% 6 8 1 4 14
70% to 79% 0 0 0 14 3
60% to 69% 1 1 0 5 2
Less than 60% 1 0 5 0 3
Total 8 23 24 24 24
![Page 7: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Page 7
Study Indicator(s) Improvement
![Page 8: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Page 8
Statistically Significant Study Indicator(s) Improvement
![Page 9: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Page 9
Study Indicator(s) Sustained Improvement
![Page 10: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Page 10
Overall Collaborative PIP Validation Performance
2009–2010 2010–2011
![Page 11: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Page 11
Trending of Collaborative PIP Validation Scores
% Score of Evaluation
Elements Met
2008–2009
2009–2010
2010-2011
90% to 100% 12 0 1
80% to 89% 0 3 8
70% to 79% 0 9 3
60% to 69% 0 0 0
Less than 60% 0 0 0
Total 12 12 12
![Page 12: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Page 12
Collaborative Study Indicator Improvement
![Page 13: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Page 13
Statistically Significant Collaborative Study Indicator Improvement
![Page 14: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Page 14
Collaborative Study Indicator Sustained Improvement
![Page 15: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Page 15
Next Steps for PMHPs
• PMHPs need to address all Points of Clarification and all Partially Met and Not Met evaluation elements.
• HSAG has provided the PMHPs with the Word version of the study submitted.
• PMHPs should use the same study document to continue working on the PIPs. PMHPs should date, bold, and strike-through any sections in which revisions are made to the study document.
![Page 16: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Page 16
Process for Disputing Validation Score
• The plan must submit its dispute via formal letter to HSAG and cc AHCA Contract Manager
• The letter should outline the evaluation element/comment being disputed and the plan’s rationale for why the score should be changed
• All responses should be e-mailed to [email protected] no later than April 1, 2011
• The HSAG PIP Review Team will review the dispute and respond to the plan with a decision within seven (7) business days
![Page 17: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Page 17
Questions and Answerson PIP validation?
![Page 18: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Page 18
Upcoming EQR Activities
Friday, March 25, 2011
Presenter:
Yolanda Strozier, MBA
Associate Director, State and Corporate Services
![Page 19: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Page 19
Upcoming EQR activities
• The next EQR Quarterly Meetings:– Wednesday, June 8, 2011 (AHCA Offices)
One-on-one TA sessions Tuesday, June 7, 2011
– Week of September 26, 2011 (Webinar)– Wednesday, January 11, 2012 (AHCA
Offices)One-on-one TA sessions Tuesday, January 10, 2012– Week of March 19, 2012 (Webinar)
![Page 20: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Page 20
Upcoming EQR activities
• Finalization of PIP Validation Reports (April 2011).
• Annual PIP Summary Report and Strategic Summary Report (April–June 2011).
![Page 21: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Page 21
Upcoming EQR activities
Next Steps• PIPs are submitted to AHCA/DOEA— August
2011• MCOs will receive HSAG’s “Statement of
Intent” (SOI) survey on Wednesday, August 10, 2011.
• Completed SOI’s due to HSAG on Monday, August 29th.
![Page 22: Summary of PMHP Performance Improvement Projects Validation Findings](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062501/5681679e550346895ddce4e6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Page 22
External Quality Review Quarterly Meeting
THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION!