summary of gsi visit july 2013

34
1 Summary of GSI Visit July 2013 Summary of GSI Visit July 2013 Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC/SixTrack Analysis of Resonances in 4D: In particular non- linear normal Sextupole Coupling Resonance Q x + 2 Q y = n Intense Collaboration with Giuliano Franchetti Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Upload: urbain

Post on 05-Feb-2016

63 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Summary of GSI Visit July 2013. Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC/SixTrack Analysis of Resonances in 4D: In particular non-linear normal Sextupole Coupling Resonance Q x + 2 Q y = n Intense Collaboration with Giuliano Franchetti. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

1

Summary of GSI Visit July 2013Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

• Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC/SixTrack

• Analysis of Resonances in 4D: In particular non-linear normal Sextupole Coupling Resonance Qx + 2 Qy = n

• Intense Collaboration with Giuliano Franchetti

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 2: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

2

Benchmarking of MICROMAP Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC Iwith MAD-X/PTC I

• MAD-X Twiss: 2nd order terms included agrees with EXACT Hamiltonian up to this order; non-symplectic due to missing higher orders, SC with rescaling turn by turn

• PTC: approximate (kicks), exact or non-exact, always symplectic, very high orders included

• Sixtrack: always symplectic, non-exact, second order

• MICROMAP: always symplectic, non-exact, first order

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 3: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

3

Benchmarking of MICROMAP Benchmarking of MICROMAP with MAD-X/PTC IIwith MAD-X/PTC II

• Set-up of the PS an example with minimal set of elements, MAD-X clean-up via seqedit

• Conversion to MICROMAP more efficient now

• Perfect agreement of 4D parameters: tunes, TWISS and dispersion!

• Chromaticity off by 16% in horizontal plan due to lack of EXACT Hamiltonian

➔ SC comparison eagerly awaited!!!

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 4: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

4

Resonance CategorizationResonance Categorization

1. Fodo with single Sextupole unstable motion at ➔sextupole resonance, no islands

2. Stabilization via octupole islands➔

3. Sextupole (constant strength) distributed around a ring first order resonance compensated no ➔islands; detuning with amplitude; large scale chaos

4. Random Errors balances resonance and detuning ➔anything possible!

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 5: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 5

Resonances in Tune diagramResonances in Tune diagram

1D Resonance

2D coupled Resonance

Fixlines

2D crossing Resonances

2D Fixpoints

Page 6: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 6

DA in 1DDA in 1D

Par

ticle

Los

s

Page 7: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 7

1D close-up1D close-up

LOSSLOSS

Page 8: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 8

2D Stable and Chaos2D Stable and Chaos

Page 9: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 9

2D Fixpoints2D FixpointsVertical HorizontalHorizontal

Page 10: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

Frank Schmidt Dynamic Aperture 10

2D Fixlines2D Fixlines

Full Projection Cut in Phase Space

Stable

Chaos

Page 11: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

11

Simple Toy PS Fodo with 1 Simple Toy PS Fodo with 1 Sextupole per FodoSextupole per Fodo

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 12: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

12Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Resonance Qx + 2Qy Large Island Resonance Qx + 2Qy Large Island TubeTube

Page 13: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

13Frank Schmidt GSI visit

X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY

Page 14: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

14Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Stroboscope Large Island Tube Stroboscope Large Island Tube

Page 15: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

15Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Resonance Qx + 2Qy Small Island TubeResonance Qx + 2Qy Small Island Tube

Page 16: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

16Frank Schmidt GSI visit

X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY

Page 17: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

17Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Stroboscope Small Island TubeStroboscope Small Island Tube

Page 18: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

18Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Resonance Qx + 2Qy on Fix-LineResonance Qx + 2Qy on Fix-Line

Page 19: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

19Frank Schmidt GSI visit

X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY

Page 20: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

20Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Stroboscope on Fix-LineStroboscope on Fix-Line

Page 21: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

21

Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line

Standard Technique I Standard Technique I

• As in 1D the expectation is that particles are trapped in the island torus around the fix-line.

• To understand this mechanism in detail on has to determine the fixline.

• With this knowledge one can construct a normal plane to the fix-line which will allow to find the extent of the torus structure and the unstable fixlines.

• The motion in the plane can be interpreted as a secondary Poincaré section of motion! In fact, in this plane the motion around the fix-line resembles a 1D resonance.

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 22: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

22

Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line

Standard Technique I I Standard Technique I I

• First step is to put a particle somewhere into the island structure.

• The method works by restricting the motion in one plane to a wedge say with positive values and best in the linearly normalized phase space (I have called this stroboscoped motion above).

• The opening angle of the wedge is the free parameter in this technique.

• In the other plane one will then find a number of islands according to the nx * Qx + ny * Qy = n resonance.

• The analysis has to be restricted to one of these islands.

• The average of all 4 coordinates represents a good approximation of the stable fix-line.

• The technique is very time consuming since a sufficient amount of data has to be available in the restricted phase space: however with 2000 turns a good approximation of the fix-line could be found in 7 steps.

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 23: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

23Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Determine Fix-lineDetermine Fix-line

X-PxX-Px Y-PyY-Py

Page 24: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

24

Determining the Fix-LineDetermining the Fix-Line

Using artificial Damping Using artificial Damping

• Experiments at LEP some 13 years ago have shown that in the presence of 4d stable fix-points the particle motions is damped to those fix-points rather than (0,0).

• The mechanism works because motion around the fix-point the particles increase there amplitude which can be seen as pseudo energy “gain”.

• Therefore, if the damping is not too strong the motion will zoom into the fix-point until the damping and the energy “gain” balances out.

• This should generally work in higher dimensions.

• One side-effect of this finding is that in presence of weak damping the resonance structure is preserved in all phase space!

• A fine-tuning of the damping as a function of the distance to the resonance and/or fix-line should improve the convergence of the technique.

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 25: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

25Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Lep: Damping at 4Lep: Damping at 4thth order order

Page 26: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

26Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Damping in 1D in SimulationDamping in 1D in Simulation

Page 27: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

27Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Damping in 2D in SimulationDamping in 2D in Simulation

Page 28: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

28

Additional Tools Additional Tools

• Originally I had hoped that NormalForm would allow to determine detuning and resonance strength.

• Although true in principle, the trouble is that this technique is divergent in the vicinity of resonance structures. Therefore, despite the valuable information gained (direction of detuning and good prediction far from resonances) one could not determine the precise location of the resonance structures.

• Another tool is the harmonic analysis which decomposes the particle motion into a set of lines.

• Despite best efforts one could not yet determine the fix-lines with the help of this complete decomposion into lines. More effort will be invested.

• However, the island tune can be nicely determine as a set of side-bands.

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 29: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

29Frank Schmidt GSI visit

FFT Large Island TubeFFT Large Island Tube

Page 30: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

30Frank Schmidt GSI visit

FFT Small Island TubeFFT Small Island Tube

Page 31: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

31Frank Schmidt GSI visit

FFT on Fix-LineFFT on Fix-Line

Page 32: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

32

Next Steps Next Steps

• The simulations will intensify both with MICROMAP and MAD-X-SC.

• We will have to define and revisit the Random Part of the multipole components newest value from ➔ Simone in collaboration with the magnet experts.

• MAD-X-SC is not yet under MPI but work has been started on that.

• The plan is to finish the analysis of the 2012 PS experiments by the end of the year 2013 and spring 2014 at the latest.

• The 2D resonance analysis will be brought to conclusion including 2D fix-points (2 separate resonance conditions full-filled: E.G. 3Qx and 4Qy) which is an additional challenge ➔publication in planning

Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Page 33: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

33Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Fix-points motion 3Qx AND 4QyFix-points motion 3Qx AND 4Qy

Page 34: Summary of GSI Visit July 2013

34Frank Schmidt GSI visit

Fix-points motion 3Qx AND 4QyFix-points motion 3Qx AND 4Qy

X-YX-Y PX-PYPX-PY