Framingham Public Schools Office of Curriculum & Instruction

Summary of 2016 State Assessment Results

School Committee Meeting November 15, 2016

Objectives • Reasons to Celebrate

• Overview of 2016 state assessment district results: o MCAS: High school and Science, Technology/Engineering

(STE) results o PARCC: Grade 3 to 8 ELA and Mathematics results

• Next Steps

Reasons to Celebrate • Last year, Fuller Middle School was the only school that

elected to take computer-based PARCC. This year, in its second year of computer-based assessment, Fuller Middle School showed significant gains in: School Ranking: An increase of 10 percentile points from the

20th to 30th percentile

Composite Performance Index (CPI): An increase of 6.4 points to 78.9 in ELA/Literacy

Student Growth Percentile (SGP): An increase of 19 points to 57 in ELA/Literacy

• Framingham High School moves from Level 3 to Level 2

Assessment Choices for Spring 2016 vs. 2015

Spring

Number of public districts

MCAS PARCC # of

districts % of

districts # of

students # of

districts % of

districts # of

students

2016 Grades 3−8

360 118 28% 121,000 243 72% 306,000

2015 Grades 3−8

359 165 46% 207,500 194 54% 227,000

Source: MCAS 2016 Preliminary Reporting Call

2016 Assessment Choice by District Size

9% 15% 28%

91% 85% 72%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Commissioner's Districtsn=84,250

Small, Medium UrbanDistricts

n=40,500

Staten=425,500

MCAS PARCC

Source: MCAS 2016 Preliminary Reporting Call

Breakdown of 2016 Assessment Choice by Race Grades 3−8 only

8% 4%

9% 3% <1%

<1% 75%

MCAS Schools

AsianBlackHispanicMixedNative AmPac IslanderWhite

6% 10%

22%

3% <1%

<1%

58%

PARCC Schools

Source: Oct. 2015 SIMS Source: MCAS 2016 Preliminary Reporting Call

Source: Spring 2014 MCAS

2016 Assessment Choice by MCAS Achievement Level – ELA

Grades 3−8 only

8% 10%

22% 26%

54% 51%

17% 13%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MCAS PARCC

Adv.Prof.NIW

Source: MCAS 2016 Preliminary Reporting Call

2016 Assessment Choice by MCAS Achievement Level – Mathematics

Grades 3−8 only

14% 17%

25% 28%

34% 32%

28% 23%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

MCAS PARCC

Adv.Prof.NIW

Source: Spring 2014 MCAS Source: MCAS 2016 Preliminary Reporting Call

Average Growth

Low Growth

High Growth

2016 State ELA/Literacy School Achievement Level & mSGP

BARBIERI

BROPHY

CAMERON

DUNNING

FRAMINGHAM HIGH

FULLER

HEMENWAY

STAPLETON

MCCARTHY

POTTER ROAD WALSH

WOODROW WILSON

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

% o

f Stu

dent

s Pro

ficie

nt o

r Adv

ance

d

School Median Student Growth Percentile (mSGP)

Average Growth

Low Growth

High Growth

2016 State Mathematics School Achievement Level & mSGP

BARBIERI BROPHY CAMERON

DUNNING

FRAMINGHAM HIGH

FULLER

HEMENWAY

STAPLETON

MCCARTHY

POTTER ROAD WALSH

WOODROW WILSON

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

% o

f Stu

dent

s Pro

ficie

nt o

r Adv

ance

d

School Median Student Growth Percentile (mSGP)

2016 State ELA Assessment MCAS and PARCC Performance Levels

28% 29%

11% 4%

20% 10% 13%

26% 18% 19%

11% 3%

26% 35%

23% 23%

38%

24% 31%

51%

28% 22%

19%

3%

36% 30%

49% 53%

35%

48%

49%

23%

49% 47%

57%

41%

9% 6% 17% 21%

7% 17%

7% 0% 5%

12% 13%

53%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BAR BRO DUN HEM MCC POT STA WIL CAM FUL WAL FHS

% o

f Stu

dent

s

Warning/Fail Needs Improvement Proficent Advanced

2016 ELA State Assessment

83.7 82.4 82.0 83.1 84.2 80.0

49.0 46.0 52.0 55.0 57.0

39.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

DISTRICT ELA Aggregate

CPI

mSGP

2016 State Math Assessment MCAS and PARCC Performance Levels

32% 27% 13%

5%

25%

9%

25% 22% 26% 33%

18% 5%

30% 32%

26%

20%

39%

25%

29% 47%

29% 26%

23%

11%

22% 26%

31%

33%

21%

37%

26%

24%

33% 25%

34%

17%

16% 15%

31% 41%

14% 28%

20% 8% 12% 15%

25%

67%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BAR BRO DUN HEM MCC POT STA WIL CAM FUL WAL FHS

% o

f Stu

dent

s

Warning/Fail Needs Improvement Proficient Advanced

2015 Math State Assessment Combined MCAS and PARCC CPI and mSGP

77.0 74.7 76.1 76.3 76.7 74.5

51.0 46.0

54.0 55.0 55.0

44.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

DISTRICT Math Aggregate

CPI

mSGP

2016 State STE Assessment MCAS Science, Technology/Engineering – Gr5, Gr8, HS

37%

19% 12%

5%

25%

9% 16%

30% 22%

31% 17%

4%

41%

45%

42%

20%

55%

38%

40%

55%

48% 40%

47%

11%

17%

20% 38%

41%

14%

39% 29%

15%

26% 23% 32%

44%

5% 16%

8%

34%

6% 14% 16%

1% 4% 6% 5%

41%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

BAR BRO DUN HEM MCC POT STA WIL CAM FUL WAL FHS

% o

f Stu

dent

s

Warning/Fail Needs Improvement Proficient Advanced

MCAS 2.0 Spring 2017

MCAS MCAS 2.0

Subjects • Science 5, 8, 10, Alternative • ELA and Math

Grades tested • ELA and Math 10 • ELA 3-8

• Math 3-8

Format • Paper only • Online and paper versions

Testing time • Untimed

• Untimed, but recommended times are shorter than 2016

MCAS 2.0 Computer-based • All students in grades 3-8 will be administered

the computer-based test with the exception of 3rd grade at Barbieri and 3rd and 5th at Brophy

• This will be the – Third year for Fuller – Second year for Cameron, Walsh, Brophy (4th) &

Wilson – First year for remaining elementary schools

MCAS 2.0 for High School • Legacy MCAS will be administered through the

class of 2020 (paper) • MCAS 2.0 will be given to this year’s eighth

grade (graduating class of 2021) • MCAS 2.0 will be a computer-based test

Next Steps • Use the school and student level results for

school improvement planning • Use as one piece of valuable information

among many others to support students • Analyze low growth performance • Analyze the results through a broader lens • Share data with directors, coordinators, and

building level leadership teams to identify action steps that will impact student achievement

Next Steps • Ensure students have opportunities to

complete assignments and take assessments online

• Explicitly teach next generation testing skills • Develop programming for digital literacy,

collaboration, research and presentation skills by reviving and modernizing the library media program

2014 2015 2016 2017

MCAS PARCC/MCAS (56%/46%)

PARCC/MCAS (72%/28%)

MCAS 2.0

Paper Fuller CBT All Others PBT

3 MS/2 ES, CBT All Others PBT

All CBT with few ES exceptions

Item Analysis No item analysis Sub claims

Sub claims TBA

PBA & EOY Tests EOY only EOY

4 Perf. Levels 5 Perf. Levels for PARCC

5 Perf. Levels/ Crosswalk to 4

TBA

Held Harmless Held Harmless Held Harmless

ACCESS PBA

ACCESS CBT & PBT (SGP-A)

ACCESS CBT

Refusals lowered participation

State Testing Transitions