sudarija tunnel melamchi water suppply project
DESCRIPTION
A study of social impact due to tunnel construction at Sundarijal- Outlet of Melamchi water supply project.By: Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C.Er. Amit Ranjit, Er. Rajendra Sapkota, Er. Yogendra Chitrakar, Er. Lokendra YadavTRANSCRIPT
Presented By:
Er. Rajendra Sapkota
Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C.
Er. Amit Ranjit
Er. Yogendra Chitrakar
Er. Lokendra Prasad Yadav
Presentation Outline
Introduction to Melamchi Water Supply project
- Er. Rajendra Sapkota
Introduction to topic, objective scope, methodology
– Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C
SWOT Analysis
– Er. Amit Ranjit
Findings
- Er. Yogendra Chitrakar
Conclusion and Recommendation
- Er. Lokendra P. Yadav
Introduction to Melamchi
Water Supply project
Er. Rajendra Sapkota
Waiting for water……
Melamchi River: source of MWSP
1. Introduction
MWSP – Much Debated Mega Project
Executing Agency- MoPPW, MWDB
Project duration – originally(July 2001 to 2006), now
extended to 2013
Estimated cost – US$ 464 million/ 317.3million in
2008
Funding: Donors & GoN
Source of water- stage I- Melamchi, Stage II& III-
Yangri & Larke(@170MLD)
1. Introduction contd…
Major component
Physical Infra structure Development
- MDS(approx. 40km), WTP, BDS, DNI
and Environmental Program
Institutional Reform
Project Implementation Support
Demand and Supply of water
S.N Time frame Demand
Supply
(corer liters)
Rainy Dry
1 2001 21.3 12 8
2 2005 28.5 12 8
3 2008 32.5 14+17 9+17
4 2015 39.7 31+17 26+17
5 2022 50 48+17 43+17
6 2027 55 65 60
7 2032 60 65 60
Source: MWSDB
d]nDrL vfg]kfgL ljsf;
;ldlt
d]=vf=lj=; sf=p=vf=Jo=jf]8{
d]nDrL vfg]kfgL
cfof]hgf
sf=p=vf=ln
d]nDrL pkTosf cjoj
+
kfgL k|zf]wg
s]Gb|, sf7df08f}+
vfg]kfgL dxz'n
lgwf{/0f cfof]u
cfof]hgf k'g{;+r/rgf, @))*
Source: MWSDB
Adjusted funding in 2008
Investme
nt
MWSP KUKL Total Remarks
GoN 73.90 16.70 90.60
ADB 103.80 33.20 137.0 Loan
JBIC 47.5 47.5 Loan
JICA 18.0 18.0 Grant
NDF 10.5 10.5 Loan
OPEC 13.7 13.70 Loan
Total 249.40 67.90 317.30
Source: MWSDB
Melamchi Project Layout
Intake Zone
Tunnel Outlet Zone: STUDY AREA
Distribution Zone
Water Treatment Plant
Source: MWSDB
1. Introduction contd..
MWSP
MWSP
SOCIAL
SOCIAL
SOCIAL
SOCIAL
We have all things although still delay in project ……??????
1. Project Area
Sundarijal VDC: Study Area
Any Question???
Thank You
Introduction to
topic, objective, scope, met
hodology
Er. Shekhar Chandra K.C
2. Introduction of the TopicSundarijal Adit
MWSP tunnel outlet
Location-Sundarijal ward no-7
About 14km north-east of Kathmandu Valley
Water Treatment Plant
Study AreaSundarijal Ward No-7
Major Caste- Tamang, Brahman-Chhetri,
Newar etc.
Major Occupation- Agriculture, Business,
service etc.
Satellite View of Sundarijal
Tunnel Outlet Site Office
Water Treatment
Plant areaStudy Area
Objective
To study the social impact due to blast on
tunnel construction
Other social issues due to project
activities
Scope of the study
Sundarijal ward no-7 (main affected area)
Mainly focus on impact due to blasting
Methodology
Secondary Data Collection
-Past Literature
Primary Data Collection
-Field Observation
-Questionnaire survey
Any Question???
Thank You
SWOT Analysis
Er. Amit Ranjit
3. SWOT Analysis• Effective way of examining Strengths and
Weaknesses, identifying the Opportunities and Threats.
• Complex Situations, limited time and resources
• provides a framework to identify critical issues
a
3. SWOT contd…..Strengths:
Satisfaction with the compensation
Improvement in the road
3. SWOT contd…..Strengths:
Improvement in the education and health infrastructure
Opportunity of employment
Environmental friendly project
Empowerment to local people
3. SWOT contd…..Weakness:
No clear guidelines to
distribute compensation
(damaged houses)
Long and formal
process for solution of any
problems.
High Intensity of sound
level
3. SWOT contd…..Weakness:
Poor solid waste management
Conventional method of tunnel boring
SUP not implemented till now
3. SWOT contd…..
Opportunities:
Expansion of market
Capacity development
Tourism development
3. SWOT contd…..Opportunities:
Increase value of land
Solution for crisis of drinking water for
Kathmandu valley
3. SWOT contd…..Threat:
Cost increase due to delay
Possibilities of disturbances
Increasing demand
3. SWOT contd…..Threat:
Possibility of mosquito breeding
Possibility of deterioration the fertility of the
agricultural land
Any Question???
Thank You
Findings
Er. Yogendra Chitrakar
4.Findings• Out come from the field social survey
• 6th December 2011, Sundarijal-7, questionnaire
• Social Impacts due to Tunnel Outlet Construction of
MWSP
• 20 households out of around 80 households from the
project area
• Inclusive Gender wise, Caste wise and Age wise
55%
45%
Genderwise
Male Female
45%
40%
15%
Agewise
15-29 30-59 >59
45%
45%
10%
Castwise
Brahman/Chhetri Tamang Newar
a. Familiarity with the Project
100 % of the people are aware of the running project
National Project
Inaugurated by the
Prime minister
b. Purpose of Construction
Familiar with the intention of tunnel construction and land
acquisition
c. Interaction about Project Major number of the local people has positively responded
Sundarijal development committee.
d. Effects due to Project Almost poured their grievances due to house cracks.
Landslides in the village, miscarriages of animals, damage to
the electrical appliances.
20
13
4
1
5
0
5
10
15
20
25
Landslide Crack in House Miscarrage of cattles
Damage of Electrical
Appliances
No Impact
Cracks on the villagers' house due to blast during construction of Tunnel
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
%
e. Satisfaction by Compensation
More than half of the people were satisfied by the
compensation provided for land acquisition and displacement.
Few households were entertained by the compensation for the
crack house
40%
55%
5%
Satisfaction with the Compensation
Yes No N/A
f. Methodology of Demand
More than 50% of the people were aware of the methodology
of pouring their dissatisfaction.
Most of them go through the committee formed for that
purpose.
g. Social Upliftment Program (SUP) For project affected people to empower people, uplift the life
style, enhancing social structure
To achieve the sustainability of the project.
Most of the people was unaware of SUP.
15%
85%
Do you know about SUP ?Yes No
h. Benefits from the Project
Half of the people accepted the benefits from the access road
constructed for the Project.
Other benefits are increase in land value, employment, education
etc.
Road50%
Increase in land value17%
Employment17%
Education6%
Others10%
Benefits
i. Disadvantages due to the Project
Hamper directly to their private properties
Other disadvantages pollutions, increase in market
price, displacement and Chinese workers behaviours
Crack in house45%
Polution21%
Incease in Market Price
7%
Displaced3%
Others24%
Disadvantages
j. Commitment to the people
Almost of the people were not known to the commitment
before lunching the Project
They were aware of the access road and compensation only by
the project.
k .View toward the employee of the Project
Most of the People put their positive views towards the
employee
Only facing nuisance due to the fouls thrown by the Chinese.
l. Overall view to the Project
All the people wish for the successful implementation of the
project
Positive aspect for the Project especially in the outlet site of the
tunnel and Water treatment plant Zone.
Wished to be the part of the contributors in the Success of
Melamchi Water Supply Project ( National Project)
Sn Name Gender Age CastFamily
No.
Familiar
to the
Project
Any
discussion
about the
Project
Saticefaction
with the
Compansatio
n
Methodolo
gy of
demand
About
SUP
About
Comitment
before
implementati
on
Any
comment
about the
Employee
of the
Project
View
towards the
imlementati
on of the
Project
Impact due
to Project
Activities
Benefits Disadvantages
1 Harka Bdr. Tamang M 87
Taman
g 3 Y N N N N N N Y VN N
2 Bhola Ghimire M 55 Bahun 4 Y A NA A N N N Y V N Migaration
3
Chandra Bdr.
Tamang M 40
Taman
g 3 Y Y N N N N N Y V RoadN
4 Sumita Lama F 28
Taman
g 4 Y N N TC N N N Y V Road Lack of Compansation
5 Kanchha Tamang M 60
Taman
g 11 Y Y N Y N U N Y U Road U
6
Durga Devi
Tamang F 48
Taman
g 9 Y Y N TC N U Y Y V Road Lack of Compansation
7 Keshab Sapkota M 48 Bahun 4 Y N Y NY N U N Y V NA Exchange with money
8 Deepika Ghimire F 28 Bahun 5 Y N N TC N R N Y V NA NA
9 Pramila Ghimire F 23 Bahun 4 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Road Pollutions
10 Hari Maya Sapkota F 36 Bahun 5 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Road Exchange with money
11 Sita Simkhada F 27 Bahun 3 Y N Y TC N N N Y V Road
12 Saraswoti Tamang F 20
Taman
g 4 Y Y N A N N Y N V V Damaged Houses
13 Sudan Shrestha M 24 Newar 13 Y N Y TC N N N Y U Road Social Problems
14 Amir Simkhada M 18 Bahun 5 Y Y Y TC Y R N Y V Road Pollutions
15 Rajendra Tamang M 15
Taman
g 6 Y N Y A N N N Y V Road Damaged Houses
16 Kanchha Shrestha M 65 Newar 6 Y Y N N N N N Y V Road Damaged Houses
17 Nirmaya Tamang F 30
Taman
g 5 Y Y Y TC N N Y Y N Road NA
18 Rabindra Ghimire M 26 Bahun 15 Y N Y TC N N N Y V Road Pollutions
19 Sabbu Ghimire F 30 Bahun 4 Y N Y TC N R N Y V Road Income enhanced
20
Hari Bahadur
Tamang M 47
Taman
g 5 Y Y N TC N N N Y V Market Pollutions
Summary of Findings
Any Question???
Thank You
Conclusion and
Recommendation
Er. Lokendra Prasad Yadav
Conclusion Compensation must be given as soon as possible in order
to implement the project smoothly in future.
This project has increased the awareness and empowered
them.
Conclusion contd…
Most of the social issues are addressed in this project, it
was noticed that the people are satisfied.
During tunnel construction through blasting, cracks are
observed in houses of local people. As a result of which
they are terrified to live in their houses.
Recommendation
Clear guidelines must be made.
SUP program must be implemented as soon as possible.
In order to empower the local people, intensive awareness
program must be conducted.
Thank You
Any Question???