success stories from the best practices registry for suicide
TRANSCRIPT
Success Stories from the Best Practices Registry for Suicide Prevention: Identifying Promising andfor Suicide Prevention: Identifying Promising and
Effective Suicide Prevention Programs
Bridging the Divide ConferenceColorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO
M 20 2011May 20, 2011
Philip Rodgers, Ph.D.Evaluation Scientist
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgementsU.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AgencySubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Agency
Howard Sudak, MDAFSPAFSP
Katrina Bledsoe, Ph.D.,SPRC
This project is supported by a grant (1 U79SM0598945 01) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). No official endorsement by SAMHSA or DHHS for the information in this presentation is intended or should be inferred.y p
What is the Best Practices Registry for S i id P ti (BPR)?Suicide Prevention (BPR)?
The BPR is an online registry of “best practices”The BPR is an online registry of best practices in suicide prevention – Over 80 programs are currently listed in the BPR
The purpose of the BPR is to identify, review, and disseminate information about best practices that address specific objectives of the National Strategy for Suicide Prevention
“P ti ” i d fi d b dl i l di– “Practices” is defined broadly, including programs, policies, protocols, awareness materials, etc.
33
Presentation objectivesPresentation objectives
At the conclusion of this presentation, participants ill b bl twill be able to:1. Define what “makes” a program effective.2 Describe the importance of targeting risk and2. Describe the importance of targeting risk and
protective factors in suicide prevention.3. Discuss how the Best Practices Registry contributes g y
to suicide prevention and how to access the BPR.4. Understand the importance of program adaptation.5. List several aspects of successful suicide prevention
programs.
44
An effective program achieves its goalsAn effective program achieves its goals
Decrease S icide
Implement Suicide
Suicide Deaths
Prevention Program
But, in our field, it may not be quite that simple
66
Why is it difficult to measure suicide deaths?Why is it difficult to measure suicide deaths?
77
Knox, K. L., Litts, D. A., Talcott, G. W., Feig, J. C., and Caine, E. D. (2003). Risk of suicide and related adverse outcomes after exposure to a suicide prevention programme in the US Air Force: Cohort study. BMJ, 327, 1376.
Why are large numbers needed?Why are large numbers needed?Small numbers are unreliable.
Suicide Rates for US & Vermont 15-19-year-oldsy
10
12US Vermont
6
8
er 1
00,0
00
2
4
Rat
e pe
01999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year
88Source: CDC for 2006.
Year
Logic Model Example: Gatekeeper TrainingLogic Model Example: Gatekeeper Training
Generic Gatekeeper Model
TrainingIntervention &
ReferralIdentificationExposure to Population
Potential I t
Gatekeeper Population “At-Risk” I di id l
Mental H lthIntercessor
(Gatekeeper)Individual Healthcare
Provider
99
It is important to determine program logict s po ta t to dete e p og a og cGeneric Gatekeeper Training Logic Model
Inputs Activities Outputs
Outcomes Process
Sh t t I t di t L tInputs Activities OutputsFunds
TrainersMaterials
GatekeeperTraining
People trainedSatisfaction
with trainingFidelit of
Short-terma.
Knowledgeb.
Intermediatec.
Identification of those at risk
Long-termf.
Treatmentg.
Trainees Fidelity of training Attitudes
c.Skills
d.Referral
Suicide deaths
1010
Why are Risk and Protective Factors Important to Suicide Prevention?Important to Suicide Prevention?
Suicide has multiple contributing factorsSuicide has multiple contributing factors
BiologicalFactors
ProximalFactors
PredisposingFactors
ImmediateTriggersFactors
FamilialRisk
S t i
HopelessnessMajor MentalDisorders
Substance
gg
A T
Public HumiliationShame
SerotonergicFunction
NeurochemicalRegulators
Intoxication
ImpulsivenessAggressiveness
SubstanceUse/Abuse
PersonalityProfile
Access To Weapons
SevereDefeatRegulators
Demographics
gg
NegativeExpectancy
Severe
AbuseSyndromes
S M di l/
MajorLoss
PathophysiologySevere
Chronic PainSevere Medical/
Neurological IllnessWorseningPrognosis
SUICIDE RISK ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP, University of MichiganDavid J. Knesper, M.D. Available at www.med.umich.edu/depression/suicide_assessment/
But, in regards to prevention, it’s important t l k t th h l t
Biological Predisposing Proximal Immediate
to look at the whole story…
F thMajor
D i
Factors Factors Factors Trigger
Death byLoss of
Intoxicated
Father Died by Suicide
Depression
Death by Suicide
Loss of Job
Impulsive
Substance Abuse
Male Childhood Abuse
A basic prevention approach is to...A basic prevention approach is to...
1.1.Identify risk and protective factors that are related to
suicide for a given populationg p p
22.Select and implement a program that targets positive
change in those risk and protective factorsc a ge t ose s a d p otect e acto s
1515
How does the BPR help to prevent suicide?How does the BPR help to prevent suicide?
The Best Practices Registry provides a list ofThe Best Practices Registry provides a list of programs that:
1. Target specific risk and protective factors related to suicide, and
2. Have been reviewed by experts using criteria related to effectiveness, or quality and safety of content.
1717
Best practices or better practices?Best practices or better practices?
Usually, the term “best” denotes “the best thing t d ”to do”This would be a misnomer in regards to the BPRMore accurate to refer to BPR as “better practices registry” because…
Th ti th t dd i id– There are many practices that can address suicide risk
– And these practices occur in a variety of settings withAnd these practices occur in a variety of settings with a variety of persons with a variety of needs and resourcesTh f th i l i l “b t” t– Therefore, there is rarely a universal “best” amongst prevention programs
1818
How is the BPR organized?SPRC Home Page (sprc.org)
How is the BPR organized?
BPR Landing Page
Section IE id b d
Section IIE t d
Section IIIAdh tEvidence-based
programs• NREPP
Expert and consensus statements
Adherence to standards
Sections do not represent levels of effectivenessSections do not represent levels of effectiveness
Programs can be adapted (changed) for ifi dspecific needs…
The BPR does not provide an exhaustive list ofThe BPR does not provide an exhaustive list of good/effective suicide prevention programsSome BPR programs may be adapted for use in p g y psettings other than those for which they were created – Example of the White Mountain Apache Tribe’s
suicide prevention efforts
2626
Program may need to be changed “adapted” f l lfor local use
It is important to consider how programsIt is important to consider how programs can be adapted for local useWhat changes need to be made to a gprogram to meet local considerations?Can these changes be made without gchanging critical elements of the program?See Linda Langford’s GLS Presentation
http://www.sprc.org/grantees/statetribe/2010/4B%20Langford.pdf
2727
Example #1 of program adaptionExample #1 of program adaption
ER Intervention for Adolescent FemalesER Intervention for Adolescent Females
Evidence-based program for use in emergency rooms for adolescent females who survived a suicide attempt
Adapted by White Mountain Apace tribe and their t t J h H ki i it f i thpartners at Johns Hopkins university for use in the
homes of male and female suicide attempt survivors
2828
Example #2 of program adaptionExample #2 of program adaption
American Indian Life Skills Development programAmerican Indian Life Skills Development program
Evidence-based program for use classroom settings in schools with all students
Adapted by White Mountain Apace tribe and theirAdapted by White Mountain Apace tribe and their partners at Johns Hopkins university for use in homes
with suicide attempt survivors
2929
p
What are some examples of SuccessfulWhat are some examples of Successful Community-Based Programs and What
M k th S f l?Makes them Successful?
Attributes of successful community programsAttributes of successful community programs
The relationship between program goals andThe relationship between program goals and suicide risk can be demonstratedEach program component is thoughtfully p g p g yconsideredProgram materials are easily understoodg yWhen appropriate, programs address multiple levelsWhen appropriate, programs provide multiple helping resources
3131
Additional important aspects of programsAdditional important aspects of programs
Are supported by evaluation resultsAre supported by evaluation resultsSeek higher-hanging fruitAre collaborativeAre collaborativeAre multi-faceted
3232
Questions?
Philip Rodgers Ph DPhilip Rodgers, Ph.D.802-446-2446d @ [email protected]
Remember to find out more about the BPRvisit www sprc orgvisit www.sprc.org
3333