substantially higher corrosion resistance in ae42

4
a, * a b a b - * 2 2 2 T = 350 ER = 12 × × B c Θ Ψ 90 0

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance in AE42

Vol. 122 (2012) ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A No. 3

Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Physics of Materials, Prague, September 48, 2011

Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance in AE42

Magnesium Alloy through Corrosion Layer

Stabilization by ECAP Treatment

P. Minárika,∗, R. Krála and B. Hadzimab

aDepartment of Physics of Materials, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 5, CZ-12116 Prague 2, Czech RepublicbUniversity of ilina, Department of Materials Engineering, ilina, Slovak Republic

The corrosion properties of magnesium alloy AE42, just extruded and with posterior eight passes throughequal channel angular pressing after extrusion, were investigated in 0.1 M NaCl by electrochemical impedancespectroscopy. The obtained samples were compared using scanning electron microscopy micrographs of thecorrosion layers created on the surface of the specimens. The background of the substantial higher corrosionresistance of the samples after equal channel angular pressing treatment was found to be the much thicker andstable corrosion layer and smaller separating fragments in comparison with the just extruded samples. Thelowering of the grain size by severe plastic deformation, especially by the equal channel angular pressing treatmentwas found to be also responsible for the enhancement of the corrosion resistance in AE42 class of magnesium alloys.

PACS: 81.05.−t, 82.45.Bb

1. Introduction

Magnesium alloys own several excellent propertieswhich puts them in the focus of today's researchers.These properties include a low density, a high specicstrength, good castability (suitable for high pressure die--casting), an ability to be turned/milled at high speedand a good weldability under controlled atmosphere. Inaddition, they have a relative low production cost, a highrecycling ability and good damping properties. Nowa-days even biodegrability and biocompatibility were foundto be interesting properties in these materials. The maindisadvantages are low elastic modulus, limited cold work-ing and toughness, limited strength and creep resistanceat elevated temperatures, high degree of shrinkage onsolidication, high chemical reactivity and limited corro-sion resistance [1].Corrosion is in the most common way known as an

electrochemical oxidation of metals in reaction with anoxidant such as oxygen. The speed of corrosion dependson many parameters such as composition of the metaland its surroundings, temperature, presence of radiationetc. In an electrochemical experiment [2, 3], the metal isimmersed in a solution with an anode, a cathode andan ionic and an electrical current path between themtwo. The corrosion layer that appears on the surface is insome cases so strong that the electrical ow can be almoststopped. When such layer is stable under normal condi-

∗ corresponding author; e-mail: [email protected]

tions, this is called passivation, and can be observed e.g.in aluminum or titanium in common environments. Thecomposition and stability of the layer for magnesium dis-solution has already been investigated with conclusionsthat magnesium dissolution in aqueous environment cre-ates partially passive lm Mg(OH)2 and/or hydride lmMgH2. Stability of the hydroxide lm depends on thepH of the solution. In the solution with the pH of 11 andhigher, the lm is stable [4], whereas when the pH is lowerthan 11 the lm of Mg(OH)2 is only partially protective.However it was reported that the corrosion resistance ofAZ31 magnesium alloy was enhanced by equal channelangular pressing (ECAP) treatment [5], which poses thequestion of the origin of this enhancement of corrosionresistance.

2. Experimental procedures

The examined magnesium alloy AE42 (4 wt% of alu-minum and 2 wt% of rare earths, mishmetal) was pre-pared by hot extrusion at T = 350 C with an extrusionratio ER = 12. Afterwards the specimens were machinedto initial dimensions of 10 mm × 10 mm × 100 mm.Both alloys were processed 8 times by ECAP to preparethe bulk material with ne grained structure, to a max-imum equivalent strain of 8 [6], which means 8 passes(8P) following route Bc dierently. Molybdenum disul-phide grease was used as a lubricant. Table I shows man-ufacturing procedure of AE42-8P specimen. The angle Θbetween two intersecting channels and the corner angle Ψwere 90 and 0, respectively.

(614)

Page 2: Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance in AE42

Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance . . . 615

TABLE I

ECAP procedure of AE42-8P specimens, P = pass.

Total countof the routes

Number of the route

1P 2P 3P 4P-8P

8P210 C,

10 mm/min

195 C,

20 mm/min

185 C,

20 mm/min

180 C,

20 mm/min

Electrochemical characteristics were investigated byelectrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in 0.1 MNaCl solution with the initial pH of 7. The sampleswere mechanically polished by 1200 emery papers be-fore each EIS tests. The characteristics were measuredby a potentiostat/galvanostat Voltalab 10 (Radiometer--analytical SAS France) and a three electrodes connec-tion (specimen, saturated calomel electrode and platinumelectrode as working, reference and auxiliary electrode,respectively). In addition, a rotation of 1000 rpm ofthe specimen was introduced for better homogeneity ofthe measurement. Measured data of the EIS tests wereevaluated by EC-Lab V10 demo software (Bio-Logic SASFrance). EIS tests were executed at room temperaturefrom 100 kHz to 20 MHz with 10 mV perturbation ampli-tude with respect to the open circuit potential (OCP). Atleast three measurements were performed for each sam-ple. The details of EIS measurements are described else-where [3, 5].The immersion was conducted in Hank's balanced salt

solution with the composition presented as Table II.

TABLE II

Composition in g/l of Hank's balanced salt solution.

KCl KH2PO4 NaCl Na2HPO4 NaHCO3 D-glucose

0.40 0.06 8.00 0.0477 0.35 1.00

The microstructure of the corrosion layers was inves-tigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A SEMJEOL 50XA with a Bruker QUANTAX 200 energy dis-persion microanalysis system (EDS) was used. He inves-tigation was performed by detection of secondary elec-trons. Composition of studied area was identied ac-cording to X-radiation created after primary beam im-pact. The samples were embedded into the conductiveresin, grinded by 1200 and 2400 emery paper, polishedby 3 µm and 1 µm polishing disc and nally polished byOPS suspension.

3. Results and discussion

The microstructure of the initial extruded samples con-sisted of larger grains of 810 µm and relatively negrains of 34 µm around the large ones. The ECAP treat-ment resulted in grain renement with grain size being34 µm, not shown here. The outcome of the EIS mea-surements, the Nyquist plots, of AE42 magnesium alloyare presented as Fig. 1 for both samples, after ve min-utes stabilization and also after seven days of immersion.The character of the graphs is alike for both samples andboth durations, which means that the physical processes

in the metal/solution interface are the same for both sam-ples. After immersion of the specimen into the aqueoussolution the surface is covered by a thick layer of mag-nesium hydroxide [7]. The plots after 5 min immersionare characterized by two well-dened capacitive loops, athigh and medium frequencies, followed by an inductiveloop in the low frequency region. The high frequency ca-pacitive loop is related to the charge transfer resistanceand the medium-frequency capacitive loop is connectedwith diusion processes through the corrosion productslayer. The inductive loop in the low frequency range isrelated to the relaxation of adsorbed species [3, 810].

Fig. 1. Nyquist plots (a negative imaginary part of animpedance as a function of a real part) obtained by EISmeasurements of samples just extruded and ECAPedafter (a) ve minutes of stabilization and (b) seven daysof immersion.

The SEM micrographs presented in Fig. 2 are obtainedafter three days of immersion, because the layer was notclearly developed for lower immersion times, but it canbe seen that the layer is created by islands of separatedcorrosion layers.From the Nyquist diagram, the polarization resistance

Rp can be evaluated by the equivalent circuit method,which corresponds to the corrosion resistance of the spec-imen. For the analyses of the plots with two capacitiveloops we used Rs − (RCT/QDL)− (RF −QF) equivalentcircuit and for the analyses of the plots with one capaci-tive loop we used Rs − (RP −QL) equivalent circuit (fordetails, see [3, 5, 11]). The total polarization resistance isequal to sum of the RCT and RF resistances or directlyto the RP. The evaluated values of Rp for both typesof specimens and both immersion times are presented asTable III.

TABLE III

Average values of Rp evaluated from Fig. 1.

Rp [Ω cm2] 5 min 168 hextruded 80± 5 296± 47

ECAPed 121± 11 586± 71

The rst noticeable fact is that the corrosion resistanceof the ECAPed sample is almost double when comparedto the only extruded one which corresponds to the widerloops in the Nyquist plots and which is more importantin the micrographs of Fig. 2, where the layer created onECAPed sample is almost twice as thick as of the just

Page 3: Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance in AE42

616 P. Minárik, R. Král, B. Hadzima

Fig. 2. Micrographs of the corrosion layer (SEM,backscattered electrons) after three days of immersionof just extruded (top panel, bulk upper right part) andECAPed sample (bottom panel, bulk lower right part).

extruded one. As the corrosion layer acts as a resis-tor during the diusion through the corrosion productlayer, which is crucial action all through corrosion pro-cess, the thicker the corrosion layer, the higher corrosionresistance.Figure 1 shows that the shape of the character of the

Nyquist plots changed after seven days of immersion butagain, the shape is the same for the both types of speci-mens. Now we are dealing just with one capacitive loopwhich corresponds to complex processes on the metal sur-face, including diusion and charge transfer processes.A plot with only one capacitive loop results from an un-even thickness of corrosion products on the metals sur-faces. This is proved by SEM micrograph, presented inFig. 3, where solid corrosion layer can be identiable onthe metal/solution interface. The fact that the corrosionlayer is evolving as a function of the immersion time wasalready shown in magnesium alloys before, e.g. [5 or 12],but an interesting fact is that the corrosion layer of theECAPed sample is still much thicker when compared tothe extrusion one. It also agrees with EIS measurements,which shows that the polarization resistance is again sub-stantially higher, almost double in comparison with theextruded one.Afterwards the long term immersion was conducted in

order to investigate the next evolution of the corrosionlayer. The SEM micrographs after thirty days of immer-sion are presented in Fig. 4 and it is quite visible that thecorrosion layers of both specimens were further develop-

Fig. 3. Micrographs of the corrosion layer (SEM,backscattered electrons) after seven days of immersionof just extruded (top panel, bulk lower left part) andECAPed sample (bottom panel, bulk upper left part).

Fig. 4. Micrographs of the corrosion layer (SEM,backscattered electrons) after thirty days of immer-sion of just extruded (top panel, bulk right part) andECAPed sample (bottom panel, bulk right part).

Page 4: Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance in AE42

Substantially Higher Corrosion Resistance . . . 617

ing. However, the dierence between the thickness of thelayer of the extruded specimen between seven and thirtydays is much smaller as compared to the evolution ofthe layer on the ECAPed sample. The second importantpoint is that there is dierence in the fragments separat-ing from the surface, much smaller from ECAPed sample:this is one of the mechanisms that stabilize the corrosionlayer of the samples with the ECAP treatment [13].

4. Conclusions

EIS measurements were conducted on a AE42 mag-nesium alloy after extrusion only and extrusion followedby eight passes through the ECAP die. The resultingpolarization resistance showed substantial higher corro-sion resistance of the ECAPed samples. The backgroundof such an improvement is much more stable and thickercorrosion layer created on the ECAPed samples. Thoughthe composition of both alloys was the same, the ECAPedsample gained better corrosion resistance. Therefore, thesevere plastic deformation is responsible for the enhancedcorrosion resistance of AE42 magnesium alloy.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge support by thegrant SVV-2010-261307, SVV-2011-263307, support ofThe Czech Science Foundation under the grant 106/09/0482 and the support of the Charles University GrantAgency under the grant 355411/2011. This work hasbeen supported by Scientic Grant Agency of Ministry

of Education and Slovak Academy of Sciences, grant No.1/0100/11 and No. 1/0262/10.

References

[1] B.L. Mordike, T. Ebert, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 302, 37(2001).

[2] D.G. Enos, Tech. Report 33, 2 (1997).

[3] L. kublová, Ph.D. thesis, University of Zilina, 2010.[4] M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in

Aqueous Solutions, 2nd English ed., Tex.: NationalAssociation of Corrosion Engineers, Houston 1974.

[5] B. Hadzima, M. Janecek, M. Bukovina, R. Kral, Int.J. Mater. Res. 100, 1213 (2009).

[6] J. Zhao, Z. Wang, S. Sun, D. Zhao, L. Ren, W. Fu,J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 16, 0349 (2009).

[7] G. Baril, G. Galicia, C. Deslouis, N. Pébère, B. Tri-bollet, V. Vivier, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, C108(2007).

[8] W. Liu, F. Cao, L. Chang, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, Cor-ros. Sci. 51, 1334 (2009).

[9] G. Baril, N. Pébère, Corr. Sci. 43, 471 (2011).[10] G. Galicia, N. Pébère, B. Tribollet, V. Vivier, Corr.

Sci. 51, 1789 (2009).[11] L. Skublova, B. Hadzima, M. Bukovina, V. Skorik,

J. Machine Manufact. 49, 18 (2009).[12] B. Hadzima, M. Bukovina, P. Doleºal, Mater. Eng./

Mater. Inº. 17, 14 (2010).[13] B. Hadzima, M. Jane£ek, R.J. Hellmig, Y. Kut-

nyakova, Y. Estrin, Mater. Sci. Forum 503-504, 883(2006).