submitted: hypertension: which should be..., apert, crouzon), is consistent with milhorat’s theory...

5
Central JSM Neurosurgery and Spine Cite this article: Park MS, Alikhani P, Tuite GF (2014) Coexistent Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Which Should Be Treated First?- Case Report and Review. JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025. *Corresponding author Michael S Park, Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL 33606; USA, Tel: 18132590901; Fax: 18132590944; Email: Submitted: 05 February 2014 Accepted: 03 March 2014 Published: 20 March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Park et al. OPEN ACCESS Keywords Chiari Malformation (CM Type I, CM1) Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) Pseudotumor Cerebri Foramen Magnum Decompression and Duraplasty (FMDD) Case Report Coexistent Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Which Should Be Treated First?- Case Report and Review Michael S. Park 1 *, Puya Alikhani 1 and Gerald F Tuite 2 1 Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair, University of South Florida, USA 2 Neuroscience Institute, All Children’s Hospital / Johns Hopkins Medicine, USA Abstract Previous reports have described concomitant presentation of papilledema and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1). The pathophysiology of each and their relationship remain poorly understood. As such, different management approaches regarding treating the CM1 or the pseudotumor initially have been described, with varying degrees of success. We report the case of an 11 year old girl with 6 mm tonsillar herniation, a cervicothoracic syrinx, and papilledema who underwent foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (FMDD). Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring revealed elevated ICP before surgery, which resolved postoperatively. The patient had complete resolution of all symptoms and her papilledema and syrinx also resolved. ABBREVIATIONS CM: Chiari Malformation; CM1: Chiari Malformation Type I; IIH: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension; ICP: Intracranial Pressure; FMDD: Foramen Magnum Decompression and Duraplasty; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computed Tomography; LP: Lumbar Puncture INTRODUCTION Previous reports have presented cases of concomitant Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) [1-19]. These are two common but incompletely understood diagnoses with similar clinical presentations; [1-4,6] a pathophysiologic relationship between the two related to craniocephalic disproportion has been suggested [3]. In this setting, knowing which to treat first can be difficult. Some suggest treating IIH first, [1,10,13] while others have described treating IIH after failed foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (FMDD) [3,6,7,20]. We present a patient with Chiari I malformation, syringomyelia and bilateral papilledema successfully treated with FMDD alone, raising provocative questions about common etiologies and the possibility that there are more undiagnosed cases of coexistent IIH and CM1 that may respond well to FMDD rather than medical treatment. CASE PRESENTATION This 11-year-old girl was diagnosed with migraine headaches at age 5, which resolved after 6 months of prophylactic headache medication. Frontal headaches returned 6 years later and became associated with intermittent blurry vision and photophobia but not emesis; they were not exacerbated by coughing, sneezing, or physical exertion. She was born at term with no other medical or family history. Physical examination showed a healthy and neurologically intact 38 kg female except for the presence of bilateral papilledema, which was not present at age five. MRI of the brain (Figure 1) and spine (Figure 2) showed 6 mm of tonsillar displacement at the foramen magnum, syringomyelia between C5 and T9 (4.5 mm in maximal diameter), and no evidence of tethered spinal cord or low-lying conus. CT and MR venography of the head and neck were negative. Continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (Camino Intracranial Pressure Monitor, Integra Life Sciences Corp) for 24 hours prior to FMDD showed fluctuating but consistently elevated ICP between 25 and 40 mm Hg, when relaxed. Foramen magnum decompression, C1 laminectomy, dural opening, shrinking of the cerebellar tonsils, and expansile duraplasty with autologous pericranium was performed under a separate anesthetic. No

Upload: others

Post on 19-Feb-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Submitted: Hypertension: Which Should Be..., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the

Central JSM Neurosurgery and Spine

Cite this article: Park MS, Alikhani P, Tuite GF (2014) Coexistent Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Which Should Be Treated First?- Case Report and Review. JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025.

*Corresponding authorMichael S Park, Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 2 Tampa General Circle, 7th Floor, Tampa, FL 33606; USA, Tel: 18132590901; Fax: 18132590944; Email:

Submitted: 05 February 2014

Accepted: 03 March 2014

Published: 20 March 2014

Copyright© 2014 Park et al.

OPEN ACCESS

Keywords•Chiari Malformation (CM•Type I, CM1)•Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH)•Pseudotumor Cerebri•Foramen Magnum Decompression and Duraplasty

(FMDD)

Case Report

Coexistent Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Which Should Be Treated First?- Case Report and ReviewMichael S. Park1*, Puya Alikhani1 and Gerald F Tuite2

1Department of Neurosurgery & Brain Repair, University of South Florida, USA2Neuroscience Institute, All Children’s Hospital / Johns Hopkins Medicine, USA

Abstract

Previous reports have described concomitant presentation of papilledema and Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1). The pathophysiology of each and their relationship remain poorly understood. As such, different management approaches regarding treating the CM1 or the pseudotumor initially have been described, with varying degrees of success. We report the case of an 11 year old girl with 6 mm tonsillar herniation, a cervicothoracic syrinx, and papilledema who underwent foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (FMDD). Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring revealed elevated ICP before surgery, which resolved postoperatively. The patient had complete resolution of all symptoms and her papilledema and syrinx also resolved.

ABBREVIATIONSCM: Chiari Malformation; CM1: Chiari Malformation Type

I; IIH: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension; ICP: Intracranial Pressure; FMDD: Foramen Magnum Decompression and Duraplasty; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computed Tomography; LP: Lumbar Puncture

INTRODUCTIONPrevious reports have presented cases of concomitant

Chiari malformation type 1 (CM1) and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) [1-19]. These are two common but incompletely understood diagnoses with similar clinical presentations; [1-4,6] a pathophysiologic relationship between the two related to craniocephalic disproportion has been suggested [3]. In this setting, knowing which to treat first can be difficult. Some suggest treating IIH first, [1,10,13] while others have described treating IIH after failed foramen magnum decompression with duraplasty (FMDD) [3,6,7,20]. We present a patient with Chiari I malformation, syringomyelia and bilateral papilledema successfully treated with FMDD alone, raising provocative questions about common etiologies and the possibility that there are more undiagnosed cases of coexistent IIH and CM1 that may respond well to FMDD rather than medical treatment.

CASE PRESENTATIONThis 11-year-old girl was diagnosed with migraine headaches

at age 5, which resolved after 6 months of prophylactic headache medication. Frontal headaches returned 6 years later and became associated with intermittent blurry vision and photophobia but not emesis; they were not exacerbated by coughing, sneezing, or physical exertion. She was born at term with no other medical or family history.

Physical examination showed a healthy and neurologically intact 38 kg female except for the presence of bilateral papilledema, which was not present at age five. MRI of the brain (Figure 1) and spine (Figure 2) showed 6 mm of tonsillar displacement at the foramen magnum, syringomyelia between C5 and T9 (4.5 mm in maximal diameter), and no evidence of tethered spinal cord or low-lying conus. CT and MR venography of the head and neck were negative.

Continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (Camino Intracranial Pressure Monitor, Integra Life Sciences Corp) for 24 hours prior to FMDD showed fluctuating but consistently elevated ICP between 25 and 40 mm Hg, when relaxed. Foramen magnum decompression, C1 laminectomy, dural opening, shrinking of the cerebellar tonsils, and expansile duraplasty with autologous pericranium was performed under a separate anesthetic. No

Page 2: Submitted: Hypertension: Which Should Be..., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the

Central

Park et al. (2014)Email:

JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025 (2014) 2/5

veil of tissue, as described by Tubbs [21] was appreciated as the cerebellar tonsils were separated.

The Camino monitor was left in place after Chiari decompression, confirming ICP normalization to the 5-15 mm Hg range. Her postoperative course was uneventful. She had complete resolution of her symptoms and papilledema on dilated fundoscopic examination at her 6 week office visit. Her postoperative MRIs are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4. At 9 months’ follow up, papilledema remained absent and the syrinx was nearly resolved.

DISCUSSIONThe relationship between IIH and CM has been established

but is poorly understood, with some clinical overlap between the two. There is a predilection for females of child bearing age in both disorders [22,23]. Obesity is strongly associated with IIH, but this has not been described for CM1. Presenting symptoms of both CM1 and IIH include headaches, paresthesias, visual disturbances, visual loss, shoulder/arm pain, diplopia, motor weakness, and numbness, and these symptoms may be exacerbated by Valsalva maneuver in both cases [3]. Bilateral papilledema is the hallmark of IIH but has also been reported in CM1 [4,11,12,15-17,19,24].

Radiographs are not absolutely diagnostic for either entity. Although CM1 is defined by herniation of the cerebellar tonsils below the foramen magnum of 5 mm or more, [12] not all patients with this finding are symptomatic or require surgical intervention [25,26]. Conversely, there are patients not meeting radiographic criteria for CM1 who are symptomatic. Aiken and Barkovic have reported a mean tonsillar location in control patients between 0.7 to 1 mm above the foramen magnum with a standard deviation of 1.9 mm; based on this, a small percentage of control patients would be expected to have a tonsillar location of 2.8 to 3.1 mm below the foramen magnum. The correlation between the degree of tonsillar herniation and presence and severity of symptoms is imperfect.

For IIH, radiographic evaluation is less helpful. Absence of a mass lesion or other cause of increased ICP is required for the diagnosis of IIH as part of the modified Dandy criteria [23,27]. However, findings of optic nerve sheath enlargement and tortuosity, empty sella syndrome, reversal of the optic nerve head, transverse sinus stenosis, and flattening of the posterior sclera have been reported [8,28]. Tonsillar herniation has been reported to have a higher incidence in patients with IIH, ranging from 1.3% to 5.9%, compared to an incidence of 0.77% in the general population without CM1; [1-3,9] one author reported an eight-fold increase in CM1 in IIH patients [3].

Additional uncertainty regarding the management of concurrent CM1 and IIH stems from an incomplete understanding of the pathophysiology of each disorder and any relation between the two; it is unclear if CM causes IIH or if raised ICP from IIH causes tonsillar displacement. One argument is that tonsillar herniation causes alterations in CSF flow dynamics at

Figure 1 MRI Brain, T1 weighted image, midsaggital view, demonstrating 6 mm of tonsillar herniation.

Figure 2 MRI Cervical spine, T1 weighted image, midsagittal view, demonstrating cervicothoracic syrinx.

Figure 3 Postoperative MRI Brain, T1 weighted image, midsagittal view.

Page 3: Submitted: Hypertension: Which Should Be..., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the

Central

Park et al. (2014)Email:

JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025 (2014) 3/5

the foramen magnum. This could occur by a partial ball-valve mechanism, [29] with reduced dampening effects to pressure changes and altered CSF-brain compliance [22]. Abnormal torcula position and compression of draining veins, [16,30] as well as arachnoid scarring from rubbing of the tonsils against bone have also been hypothesized as causative factors [31,32]. Ultimately there is CSF obstruction at the foramen magnum [33] with creation of a CSF pressure gradient between the cranial and cervical compartments [29,34]. The demonstration of 4-8 mL CSF flow across the foramen magnum during periods of Valsalva, with 0.6 mL CSF flow caudally with transmission of resting cardiac impulse, [35] combined with a ball-valve mechanism allowing ingress of CSF into the cranial compartment without allowing sufficient egress into the cervical compartment would lead to increased ICP and IIH.

Acquired inferior tonsillar displacement has been reported, usually following lumbar CSF diversion [9,14,33,36,37]. Tonsillar herniation has also been reported in association with both supra- and infratentorial mass lesions and hydrocephalus, with resolution of the tonsillar herniation after primary treatment of the cyst, tumor or hydrocephalus [38-40].

Bejjani hypothesizes that relative craniocephalic disproportion could account for both; a small posterior fossa could give the tonsillar herniation associated with CM1 and compound the effects of brain engorgement from venous stasis or altered CSF absorption [3]. This idea of craniocephalic disproportion, as well as the association of CM1 with achondroplasia as well as osteochondrodysplastic and craniofacial disorders (e.g., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the notion of impaired CSF absorption due to constriction of cerebral venous drainage and/or a dynamic effect both exerted on and by the superior sagittal sinus leading to increased brain turgor has also been postulated as a cause of both slit-ventricle syndrome and so-called normal volume hydrocephalus [30].

Given the current level of understanding regarding the

pathophysiology of both disorders, and its chicken-and-egg nature, it is unclear if the primary treatment should be acetazolamide (for IIH) or FMDD (for CM1). To our knowledge, there is only one case of successful primary acetazolamide treatment for concomitant CM1 and IIH leading to resolution of tonsillar herniation [17]. Other reports in which the IIH was treated first have yielded satisfactory results with regards to the IIH, but without change in the CM; [1,10,13] one author concluded that the two entities were coincidental [31]. Additional reports have described development or exacerbation of CM1 following treatment for IIH, requiring subsequent treatment with FMDD [1,4,5,16].

Other cases of concomitant CM1 and IIH describe primary CM1 treatment with resolution of papilledema, besides this case report [11,16,18,19]. In two of these, ICPs were elevated preoperatively and normal postoperatively [11,18]. In another, FMDD effected resolution of papilledema, but the patient developed optic nerve atrophy and residual visual field deficit [19].

Fagan described a “Chiari Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome” in which patients developed recurrent Chiari-like symptoms, elevated opening pressure on LP, and transient relief with high volume CSF drainage following FMDD, ultimately proceeding to shunting. They postulated that FMDD altered CSF compliance at the foramen magnum, providing temporary relief, but that the underlying IIH remained until CSF diversion, [6] a theory also espoused by Bejjani. In his series of 6 patients of FMDD for CM1, however, none had papilledema; as the dura became fibrotic following surgery, the compliance was altered further, and all six proceeded to CSF diversion. He postulated that they had IIH without papilledema preoperatively [3]. Additional treatment failures with FMDD have been described, requiring subsequent pharmacologic treatment in one case [7] and ventriculoperitoneal shunting after elevated ICPs 2 years postoperatively were found in another [20].

We present a case of coexistent papilledema, CM1 and syrinx successfully treated with FMDD, raising the possibility that FMDD should be considered more frequently as the treatment of choice for concomitant papilledema and CM1, particularly when syrinx is present. Unfortunately, in our review, only in one case was spinal cord syrinxes present [10].

In the absence of a syrinx, the evaluation and clinical judgment are critical. Workup and treatment of hydrocephalus is the first priority, but if negative, the presence of papilledema, together with the data likely accrued to this point in the workup (i.e., referable signs and/or symptoms, tonsillar herniation, papilledema, and absence of hydrocephalus) leads to several options, including ICP monitoring, acetazolamide trial, and FMDD, and raising the fundamental question raised by this case. Additional findings such as spinal cord syrinx, scoliosis, or bulbar signs and symptoms may favor FMDD over the others [10]. Proceeding with FMDD, as in this case, would address the CM1 and the papilledema (or IIH) can be followed postoperatively. The management would revert to that as for IIH without tonsillar herniation, including LP, acetazolamide, optic nerve sheath fenestration, and shunting, although FMDD may decrease ICP through several mechanisms, as discussed earlier, [3,6] and obviate the need for CSF diversion. Although it has been argued

Figure 4 Postoperative MRI Cervical spine, T1 weighted image, demonstrating resolution of syrinx.

Page 4: Submitted: Hypertension: Which Should Be..., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the

Central

Park et al. (2014)Email:

JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025 (2014) 4/5

that FMDD in the setting of elevated ICP leads to an increased risk of CSF leak, [10] we believe this risk to be small.

CONCLUSIONIn this case, we proceeded directly with FMDD; this was

largely driven by the presence of the cervicothoracic syrinx. It would also be reasonable to proceed with FMDD in the presence of neurological deficits, especially bulbar signs. As the preceding discussion illustrates, the management of concomitant Chiari I malformation and papilledema can be complex. This case and review of the literature are presented in the hope that it may guide management of similarly challenging cases.

REFERENCES1. Aiken AH, Hoots JA, Saindane AM, Hudgins PA. Incidence of cerebellar

tonsillar ectopia in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a mimic of the Chiari I malformation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33: 1901-1906.

2. Banik R, Lin D, Miller NR. Prevalence of Chiari I malformation and cerebellar ectopia in patients with pseudotumor cerebri. J Neurol Sci. 2006; 247: 71-75.

3. Bejjani GK. Association of the Adult Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: more than a coincidence. Med Hypotheses. 2003; 60: 859-863.

4. Choudhari KA, Cooke C, Tan MH, Gray WJ. Papilloedema as the sole presenting feature of Chiari I malformation. Br J Neurosurg. 2002; 16: 398-400.

5. Delen F, Togay Işıkay C, Uğur HÇ. Chiari malformation presenting with pseudotumor cerebri: what is the best treatment? Acta Neurol Belg. 2012; 112: 389-392.

6. Fagan LH, Ferguson S, Yassari R, Frim DM. The Chiari pseudotumor cerebri syndrome: symptom recurrence after decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation type I. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006; 42: 14-19.

7. Furtado SV, Visvanathan K, Reddy K, Hegde AS. Pseudotumor cerebri: as a cause for early deterioration after Chiari I malformation surgery. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009; 25: 1007-1012.

8. Gibby WA, Cohen MS, Goldberg HI, Sergott RC. Pseudotumor cerebri: CT findings and correlation with vision loss. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 160: 143-146.

9. Johnston I, Jacobson E, Besser M. The acquired Chiari malformation and syringomyelia following spinal CSF drainage: a study of incidence and management. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998; 140: 417-427.

10. Kandasamy J, Kneen R, Gladstone M, Newman W, Mohamed T, Mallucci C. Chiari I malformation without hydrocephalus: acute intracranial hypertension managed with endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV). Childs Nerv Syst. 2008; 24: 1493-1497.

11. Kurschel S, Maier R, Gellner V, Eder HG. Chiari I malformation and intra-cranial hypertension:a case-based review. Childs Nerv Syst. 2007; 23: 901-905.

12. Milhorat TH, Chou MW, Trinidad EM, Kula RW, Mandell M. Chiari I malformation redefined: clinical and radiographic findings for 364 symptomatic patients. Neurosurgery. 1999; 44: 1005-1017.

13. Sinclair N, Assaad N, Johnston I. Pseudotumour cerebri occurring in association with the Chiari malformation. J Clin Neurosci. 2002; 9: 99-101.

14. Sullivan LP, Stears JC, Ringel SP. Resolution of syringomyelia and Chiari I malformation by ventriculoatrial shunting in a patient with pseudotumor cerebri and a lumboperitoneal shunt. Neurosurgery.

1988; 22: 744-747.

15. Tubbs RS, Beckman J, Naftel RP, Chern JJ, Wellons JC, Rozzelle CJ, Blount JP, Oakes WJ. Institutional experience with 500 cases of surgically treated pediatric Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Peds. 2011; 7: 248-256.

16. Vaphiades MS, Eggenberger ER, Miller NR, Frohman L, Krisht A. Resolution of papilledema after neurosurgical decompression for primary Chiari I malformation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 133: 673-678.

17. Vaphiades MS, Braswell R. Resolution of Chiari I malformation following acetazolamide therapy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2007; 22: 9-11.

18. Vrabec TR, Sergott RC, Savino PJ, Bosley TM. Intermittent obstructive hydrocephalus in the Arnold-Chiari malformation. Ann Neurol. 1989; 26: 401-404.

19. Zhang JC, Bakir B, Lee A, Yalamanchili SS. Papilloedema due to Chiari I malformation. BMJ Case Rep. 2011; 2011.

20. Schmitt M, Kiefer M, Antes S, Eymann R. Detection of hidden pseudotumour cerebri behind Chiari 1 malformation: value of telemetric ICP monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012; 28: 1811-1813.

21. Tubbs RS, Smyth MD, Wellons JC 3rd, Oakes WJ. Arachnoid veils and the Chiari I malformation. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100: 465-467.

22. Bejjani GK, Cockerham KP. The Adult Chiari Malformation. Contemp Neurosurg. 2001; 23: 1-7.

23. Bejjani GK, Cockerham KP, Pless M, Rothfus WE. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Contemp Neurosurg. 2002; 249: 1-9.

24. Haaland Stone WJ, Ittner EA, Teitelbaum BA, Messner LV. Progressive, asymptomatic papilledema as the presenting sign of a Chiari I malformation. Optometry. 2012; 83: 114-119.

25. Meadows J, Kraut M, Guarnieri M, Haroun RI, Carson BS. Asymptomatic Chiari Type I malformations identified on magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 2000; 92: 920-926.

26. Strahle J, Muraszko KM, Kapurch J, Bapuraj JR, Garton HJ. Natural history of Chiari malformation Type I following decision for conservative treatment. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011; 8: 214-221.

27. Smith JL. Whence pseudotumor cerebri? J Clin Neuroophthalmol. 1985; 5: 55-56.

28. Suzuki H, Takanashi J, Kobayashi K, Nagasawa K, Tashima K. MR imaging of idiopathic intracranial hypertension. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001; 22: 196-199.

29. Heiss JD, Patronas N, DeVroom HL, Shawker T, Ennis R. Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia. J Neurosurg. 1999; 91: 553-562.

30. Rekate HL. Classification of slit-ventricle syndromes using intracranial pressure monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993; 19: 15-20.

31. Barkovich AJ, Wippold FJ, Sherman JL, Citrin CM. Significance of cerebellar tonsillar position on MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986; 7: 795-799.

32. Elster AD, Chen MY. Chiari I malformations: clinical and radiologic reappraisal. Radiology. 1992; 183: 347-353.

33. Lancione RR Jr, Kosmorsky GS. When does low mean high? Isolated cerebral ventricular increased intracranial pressure in a patient with a Chiari I malformation. J Neuroophthalmol. 2001; 21: 118-120.

34. Williams B. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure-gradients in spina bifida cystica, with special reference to the Arnold-Chiari malformation and aqueductal stenosis. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 1975; : 138-150.

35. Du Boulay G, O’Connell J, Currie J, Bostick T, Verity P. Further investigations on pulsatile movements in the cerebrospinal fluid pathways. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1972; 13: 496-523.

Page 5: Submitted: Hypertension: Which Should Be..., Apert, Crouzon), is consistent with Milhorat’s theory of CM1 being a disorder of mesenchymal origin [9,12,22]. At the same time, the

Central

Park et al. (2014)Email:

JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025 (2014) 5/5

Park MS, Alikhani P, Tuite GF (2014) Coexistent Chiari Malformation and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Which Should Be Treated First?- Case Report and Review. JSM Neurosurg Spine 2(3): 1025.

Cite this article

36. Padmanabhan R, Crompton D, Burn D, Birchall D. Acquired Chiari 1 malformation and syringomyelia following lumboperitoneal shunting for pseudotumour cerebri. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005; 76: 298.

37. Welch K, Shillito J, Strand R, Fischer EG, Winston KR. Chiari I “malformations”--an acquired disorder? J Neurosurg. 1981; 55: 604-609.

38. Onesti ST, Ashkenazi E, Miller AM, Michelsen WJ. Resolution of

acquired tonsillar herniation after resection of supratentorial meningioma. Case illustration. J Neurosurg. 1997; 86: 572.

39. Sgaramella E, Perria C. Regression of syringomyelia after removal of a posterior fossa epidermoid tumour. Br J Neurosurg. 1996; 10: 409-411.

40. Sheehan JM, Jane JA Sr. Resolution of tonsillar herniation and syringomyelia after supratentorial tumor resection: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2000; 47: 233-235.