submission cover sheets - amazon s3 · 2018. 6. 12. · attachment 1: comments: full name: request...

4
Organisation: Affected property: 57 Daniel Iurada 144 Ferrars St Pty Ltd 144 Ferrars St Sth Mlebourne Iurada_144_Ferra See Attached Letter Attachment 1: Comments: Full Name: Yes Request to be heard?: Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Precinct: Montague Attachment 2: Attachment 3:

Upload: others

Post on 21-Aug-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Submission Cover Sheets - Amazon S3 · 2018. 6. 12. · Attachment 1: Comments: Full Name: Request to be heard?: Yes Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Precinct:

Organisation:

Affected property:

57

Daniel Iurada

144 Ferrars St Pty Ltd

144 Ferrars St Sth Mlebourne

Iurada_144_Ferra

See Attached Letter

Attachment 1:

Comments:

Full Name:

YesRequest to be heard?:

Submission Cover SheetFishermans Bend Planning Review Panel

Precinct: Montague

Attachment 2:

Attachment 3:

Page 2: Submission Cover Sheets - Amazon S3 · 2018. 6. 12. · Attachment 1: Comments: Full Name: Request to be heard?: Yes Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Precinct:

Thursday,14thDecember2017

TheHon.RichardWynneMP

MinisterforPlanning

Level16

8NicholsonStreet

EASTMELBOURNEVIC,3002

DearMinister,

DraftFishermansBendFramework&PlanningSchemeAmendmentGC81

144FerrarsStreet,SouthMelbourne

Submission

IntroductionandBackground

IuradaPropertyGroupactfor144FerrarsPtyLtd,whoownthesiteattheabovementionedaddress.

Thesitehasanareaof273squaremetersanditislocatedonthesoutherncorneroftheintersectionofFerrarsStreetandThistlethwaiteStreet.ItisintheMontaguePrecinctwithinFishermansBend.

144FerrarsPtyLtdisassociatedwithRavensdownShippingServicesPtyLtd(RSS)whooccupytheexistingbuilding.RSSisafreightandbulkshippingbusinessthatestablishedonthesitein2011andsincethattimethebusinesshassteadilygrownandisexpandingintonewmarkets.

WithinthePortPhillipPlanningSchemethefollowingprovisionsarecurrentlyapplicabletothesite:

– Amandatorymaximumbuildingheightof8storeys;– Amandatorymaximumstreetwallheightof20mor5storeys

(whicheveristhelesser);

Page 3: Submission Cover Sheets - Amazon S3 · 2018. 6. 12. · Attachment 1: Comments: Full Name: Request to be heard?: Yes Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Precinct:

– Mandatorytowersetbacksabovethebuildingpodiumof10mtostreetsandside/rearboundaries;

– Preferredmaximumparkingratesof1spaceperdwellingand1spaceper100squaremetresofretail/commercialgrossfloorarea;and

– Arequirementtopreparesitespecificdevelopmentcontributions.–

Pursuanttotheseprovisions,andtoaccommodatetheexpanseoftheexistingbusiness,anapplicationwaspreparedandsubmittedtotheCityofPortPhillipon25October2017.Theapplicationreferencenumberis951/2017.

ThebuildingthatisthesubjectoftheapplicationhasbeendesignedbyJacksonClementsBurrowsArchitects(seeFigure1below)andtheapplicationproposes:

– Afivestoreycommercialbuildingconstructedtoalltitleboundaries;– Approximately800squaremetresofnetcommercialfloorarea;– 30squaremetrescaféatgroundfloorlevel;and– 12carparkingspacesand7bicycleparkingspaces.

Figure1

ArchitecturalPerspectives

Source:JacksonClementsBurrowArchitects

Despitereceivingarequestforsubmissionoffurtherinformationon3November2017,theCityofPortPhillipofficershaveadvisedthattheyaregenerallysupportiveoftheproposal.

Page 4: Submission Cover Sheets - Amazon S3 · 2018. 6. 12. · Attachment 1: Comments: Full Name: Request to be heard?: Yes Submission Cover Sheet Fishermans Bend Planning Review Panel Precinct:

ProposedHeritageDesignation

ThenewdraftFishermansBendFrameworkPlanandPlanningSchemeAmendmentGC81includearangeofnewprovisions,includingarecommendationforheritageprotection(subjecttofurtherassessment)fortheexistingbuilding(seePage59ofthedraftFramework).

Thisproposalisperplexingastheexistingbuildinghasbeenthesubjectofsignificantinterventionworks.OursubmissionisthatthereisinsufficientjustificationintheBIOSISBackgroundHeritageReportandthatthebuildingisnotworthyofbeingidentifiedassignificantandthereforeshouldnotbeprotected.

WehavealsoconsultedtheCityofPortPhillipofficersregardingthisproposalinthedraftFramework,andtheyhaveadvisedthattheyalsodonotsupportit.

OtherConcerns

Inadditiontoourconcernsregardingthepossibleheritagedesignation,therearetwootherpartstooursubmission.

Firstly,wedonotagreethatanyproposedprovisionsinAmendmentGC81shouldbemandatory.

Secondly,wesuggestthatallexistingpermitsandcurrentapplicationsshouldenjoythebenefitoftransitionalprovisions.

Conclusion

Wetrustthattheconcernswehaveraisedwillbegivenproperconsiderationduringtheprocess,andultimatelywelookforwardtodevelopingoursitetoallowourbusinesstocontinuetogrowintheMontaguePrecinct.

Yourssincerely,

DanielIurada

Director