su nivu r y mi n tng i ri vi s i on...su nivu r y "mi n tng i ri vi" s i on ontario nts:...
TRANSCRIPT
1I016SW0060 2,, 265 HEENAN
010
GEOPHYSICAL REPORT on a
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY,,,-..,,.~--r,
Mineral Claims S-353911-923 incl. and S-359145
HEKNAN TOWNSHIPsu nivu R Y "MI N TNG i ri vi" s i ON
ONTARIO NTS: 41-0-16
p.A. KKLLY P.Eng. JU1.Y 11,1973 1'al conbri dgc Nickel Mines Limited
l 67 Wil son Avenue Timmins, Ontario
ABSTRACT
16^05 li ne/mi le s of magnetometer survey covering twelve claims
located in south-east Heenan Township was carried out under contract
during May and June 1973.
The claims cover a sequence of Archean calc-alkaline-thoelites
mantled by Algoma-type iron formations. These formations are folded in a
west plunging anticlinal structure trending east-west.
The survey outlined the position and orientation of the iron
formation but the intense magnetic response of these rocks probably ob
scured further delineation of volcanic stratigraphy adjacent to the mag
netite-bearing zones.
The structure of the rocks underlying the property appears to be
an overturned, west plunging, east-west trending anticline. The axial plane
dips steeply north-northwest.
Additional detailed geological mapping and mercury geochemistry is
recommended.
James A. Kelly July 11, 1973
PROPERTY:
(a) Total number of claims
(b) Recorded numbers
(c) Dates of Recording
(d) Staked by
(c) Status
Twelve (12)
S-353911 - 921 incl; S-359145
June 14, 1972 (S-353911 - 921)
June 27, 1973 (S-359145)
Fred Blake and Garfield MacVeigh
S-353911 - 21 twenty (20) days due June 14, 1973 (extension granted to Dec. 31, 1973
S-359145 - twenty (20) days due June 27, 1974
2) LOCATION:
(a) Township
(b) Mining Division
(c) N.T.S.
(d) Latitude
(e) Longitude
(f) Additional Data
Heenan and part of Marion
Sudbury
41-0-16
47 0 47' N
82 0 21' W
48 miles due east of Chapleau Ontario
3) OWNERSHIP:
(a) Recorded Owner
(b) Address
(c) Interest
Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited
P.O. Box 40, Commerce Court West, Toronto, Ontario
1007o transferred to Falconbridge, June 30, 1972
4) ACCESS:
(a) Summer - via f loat equipped Beaver aircraft to Woman River k, mile
south of junction with Opeepeesway River then via trail \
mile to west-northwest.
- via canoe from Jerome on Opeepeesway Lake. The Eddy Forest
Products road from Jerome to Rush Lake is no longer usable as
all bridges were removed in 1971. The canoe route involves at
least 21 portages.
(b) Winter - via helicopter or snowmachine from base on Rush Lake. Ice
conditions on the Woman River would be hazardous for ski/wheel
equipped aircraft. It is probable that winter logging trails
from the Eddy company operations in Mallard and Benton Twps.
might penetrate the area thus permitting use of
Bombardier tractors. The extent and location of such routes
is not, known at this time, however.
5) HISTORY:
The Woman River iron formation, an oxide-sulfide volcanogenic exhalite
deposit has been the center of exploration activities in the area.
These iron formations have been extensively trenched sampled and drilled by
Jefferson Mining Corporation later Central Sudbury Lead-Zinc Mines Limited
and still later as Stackpool Mining and Holding Limited. Initial work was begun
in 1910. Efforts to date have outlined pockets containing moderate tonnages of
low grade iron. Minerology of the iron-bearing zones is too diverse, however, to
yield economic metal concentrates by present methods.
Elsewhere in the general area some gold and base metal activities have occurred
from time to time. ]n 1946 Fummerton Mining did some, exploratory work on 16 un-
patented claims to the west of Claim Lake. Results, if any, are not known.
During 1971 and early 1922. discovery of a "porphyry copper" occurrence led
to a staking stampede in the Rush Lake area (Marion, Genoa, Mallard and Eric
Townships). Nothing of economic or academic interest was uncovered and most
claims were allowed to lapse.
Renewed prospecting activities on gold occurrences in the Swayze-Dore-Heenan
area are reported to have taken place in recent months, however.
The area was mapped by A.M. Goodwin during the 1961 and 1962 field seasons.
The final report, G.R. No.38 and map, No. 2067 (l" = \ mi.) was published by the
O.D.M. in 1965.
6) GENERAL GEOLOGY:
The claims cover a section of acid to intermediate volcanic rocks overlain
by oxide and sulfide bearing iron formation and basic flows. All consolidated
rocks in the. claim group are of Archean age.
Northwest trending faults cut and locally displace the sequence southwest
of the property. Weak to moderate foliation in the area strikes about S60 to
700E .
Within the claim group the volcanic sequence occuppies the north limb of a
regional anticline which strikes and plunges westwards through southern Heenan
Township 4
Sources of Information
O.n.M. Map /7 2067 - Heenan, Marion and Northern Part of Genoa
Township; A.M. Goodwin, 3966
7) MAGNETOMETER SURVEY:
(a) Grid
(1) Baseline - Rearing N42 0 30'E, length - 11,000 feet
(2) Crosslines - bearing N47 30'W, length - 82,150 feet (@ 200' intervals)
(3) Ticlines - bearing N42 O 30'E, length - 2,600 feet
Total line/miles cut - 16.05
(4) Stations - 1779 @ 50' intervals
(5) Tie-in - the base line intersects the Heenan-Marion township line
but exact survey co-ordinates are not known.
(6) Personnel - under contract by Fred Blake, P.O. Box 187, Temagami, Ontario
(7) Dates - May 20 to June 12, 1973
(b) Magnetometer Survey:
(1) Purpose - to outline the volcanic stratigraphy
(2) Instrument - Scintrex MF-2, a battery -powered transistorized,
direct reading instrument which reads the vertical
component of the earth's magnetic field.
(3) Sensitivity - ^)or (-) 20 gammas/ scale division
(4) Theory of Method - the fluxgate magnetometer employs a satuarable core
system which consists of two highly permeable metallic
strips about which primary coils have been wound. An
alternating, low frequency field (l KH z) is applied
Lo these coils through an oscillator. This field is
sinusoidal and drives the strips into saturation during
each half cycle resulting in an even rate change of
permeability of the cores or strips ( at 2 KH z).
Any ambient magnetic field acting on this system yields
a phnse variation or flux which, when gated at a certain
frequency (in this case the second harmonic), induces
voltage pulses in an adjacent seconadry winding. These
(5) Procedure
(6) No. of Readings
(7) Personnel
(8) Covering J)':tes
- 4 -
pulses are amplified, fed through a phase dector
and emerge as a D.C. signal. As this signal is directly
proportional to the strength of the ambient field, the
strength of the exterior magnetic field can be read
directly on a voltmeter calibrated in gammas.
The accuracy of the Scintrex instrument is within
n.5% of full scale between 1000 and 10,000 gamma range
and within 1.070 between the 10,000 to 30,000 gamma
range.
- a magnetic base station was established between lines
50 and 52N on the east boundary of claim S-353913
(see map). From here auxilliary base stations were
established. Readings were then taken at 50 foot
intervals with traverses so arranged that the auxill
iary stations could be re-read at least every hour.
In this manner diurnal and instrument drift variations
were established and the appropriate corrections made.
The final magnetometer survey map is presented as
Figurelattached to this report.
1779
under contract by Fred Blake. P.O. Box 187, Temagami
magnetometer readings : June 14 to 24th., 1973
drafting and report preparations June 27-30 and
July 4 to 6, and July 9 to 11. 1973 ^
8) RESULTS;
As expected, the location, strike and dip of the iron formation are well
established. Unfortunately, the intense magnetic response due to these formations
would tend to mask any weaker anomalous zones in underlying formations.
Within the underlying volcanics, areas of more siliceous rocks appear to underly
portions of claims S-353918 -914 and S-353920
- i) -
9) CONCLUSIONS and RECOMMENDATIONS:
The magnetic survey has delineated the zones of iron formations within
that portion of the volcanic pile covered by the twelve claims.
The zone of negative response striking E-W along the southern boundary
appears to be caused by a flat magnetic body, probably the iron formation.
If. this is the case the magnetic patterns would indicate an overturned
anticlinal structure whose axial plane strikes and plunges west-southwest
and dips steeply north-northwest.
It is recommended that detailed geological mapping and mercury geochemical
propspecting be crrried out on these areas lying east of the iron formations.
Respectfully submitted,
A. Kelly,'P.Eng. T& lconbridge Nickel Mines Limited July 9, 1973
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOG TECHNICAL DAT,
•noiesweaee a .iaes HEENAN 900
S ZO aV)^
g Sb O
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
MagnetometerType of Survey——
Township or Area. Claim hnlrlrr(s)Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited
Heenan
P.O. Box 40, Commerce Court West, Toronto, Ontario
Author of Report James A. Kelly_______^_____
Address 724 Churchill Street, Timmins, Ontario
Covering Dates of Survey May 20 - July 11. 1973————(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line rut 16.05———^——.————————
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical- Electromagnetic, j
-Magnctometcr—L--Radiometric——Ji^
-Other________
DAYSper claim
Geological.
Geochemical. 6AIRBORNE C REDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)
DATE- July 23, 1973 SIGNATURE:
PROJECTS SECTION Res. Geol. -—————Previous Surveys /t,,
Qualification.!?.
jUXby. .date.
GEOLOGICAL KRANCH
Approved by. -date.
GEOLOGICAL BRANCH.
Approved by. -date.
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSEDList numerically
353911S(prefix) (number)
...S.........................35391.2,
..3.5.3.9A.3..
.S.,.......................353915,
.8..........................353916.
.S..........................353912,
.S..........................353918.S 353919
S
S
353920
353921
-^SatASr
TOTAL CLAIMS———ii.
Show instrument technical data in each space for type of survey submitted or indicate "not applicable"
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS
Number of Stations—— 1779 .Number of Readings. 1779
Station interval. Line
50 Feet
spacing. 200 feet
Profile scale or Contour intervals,———-
MAGNETIC
Instrument ____Scintrex MF-2
1000 gammas(specify for each type of survey)
20 gammasAccuracy - Scale constant———Diurnal correction mrthnH main base with auxllliary stations readings to give diurnal curveBase station location on east boundary of claim S-353913 between lines SON and 52N——————
ELECTROMAGNETIC
Instrument-,————-——---——.^—-—-^-—-——.—^-^----—^———---^-———.^—-—-----——————-^.^^-----—————.Coil configuration ————-—-———————.——.-——-—-—————..—.^——...^———.——.—————.———.—^——Coil separation----^—,-—^—.—.^^-.—--^-.——.-—-—^————.——-.—^^.^.———^——.-.^—^—.—--———..———.Accuracy^__^^_^_______^_________^__.______^__^____^^___^____^_^_^^—______^^^__.Method: CH Fixed transmitter d Shoot back d Inline O Parallel lineFrequency.
(specify V.L.F. station)Parameters measured. GRAVJ'i'Y
Instrument ——————
Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy-——————--————————- INDUCED POLARIZATION - RESISTIVITY
Instrument.Time domain. Frequency__ Power————.
Frequency domain.. Range————^—-
Electrode array.-— Electrode spacing. Type of electrode,
File
GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
RECEIVED
J UL 2 5 1973
C
JH J ZOwCflO WuI-"-mcm
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT SECT"" FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type nf Survey Magnetometer
Township or Area HeenanClaim hnlHrrM Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited
P.O. Box 40, Commerce Court West, Toronto, Ontario
Author of Report James A. Kelly
Address 724 Churchill Street, Timmins, Ontario
rnvprinp na * M nf Survey May 20 - July 11, 1973(linecutting to office)
Total Miles of Line rut 16.05
SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED Geophysical per etata
- -KlfrirnmaanerirENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first -Magnetometer —— 95 —————
' survey, ~Radiom*Mrir, ,
F.MTKR 2 0 d ays for each -Otheradditional survey using r;pMlr,mralsame grid. Gpfichfi-nifal
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Vlagnetomeier K]prlrnmnpnetir Radinrnetrir(enter days per claim) J s
riATK: J"!y 23, 1973 siniSIATIIRK: ( ^^/J^AujKbr of Report orient
PROJECTS SECTION
Res. Geol. Qualifications ^ ,e^^ 1
Previous Surveys
Checked hy date
OKOT.OniCAl.KRANCH
i A pproved hy date
oKomnir-ALKKANrn
Approved h y .,,.,, . Hate.
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
S 353911(prefix) (number)S 353912
...............S............................353SA3........S 3.53914
...............8............................353SA5........
,..,.........S............................353916.......
S O COQ1 7
S . . ... ...........353918.......
...............S............................353919........
S 35392Q
,.........,..S............................353921.......
...............S............................3591A5........
TOTAL CI, A IMS 12
If space insufficient, attach list
Show instrument technical data in eacli space for type of survey submitted or indicate "not applicable"
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS
Number of Stations _____ 1 779 ——————————.———^————— Number of Readings _____ 1779Station interval _____ 5 0Line spacing _____ 200 feet
Profile scale or Contour intervals _______ 1000 gammas(specify for each type of survey)
MAGNETIC
Instrument ____ Sr.-infrpy ————. MF-? ——.—..^—————^^.^^^Accuracy - Scale constantDiurnal correction mrtlmri main base with auxilliary stations readings to give diurnal curveBase station Inratinn on east boundary of claim S-353913 between lines SON and 52 N _____
ELECTROMAGNETIC"Instrument ——-—-—.————————.————-——..-—^——-————-—.——..———-——.^———.—..^^-——^Coil configuration Coil separation -—.Accuracy ———^^Method: Q Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD Inline CD Parallel lineFrequency ^^^^^-^^^^^^^^.^^^-^—^^^^^^^^^^^,..^^^^^^^^^^--.—^.^.^^^^^^^^^^-^^^^^^^^^^^-—.^-
(specify V.L.F. station)
Parameters measured -^^———————^—.—————-^-—^-^^-———^.^--^--—..———---—---——.^—^-—-—-.-—GRAVITY
Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location.
Elevation accuracy——————————————INDUCED POLARIZATION - RESISTIVITY
Instrument.Time domain___________________________ Frequency domain.Frequency_______________________________ Range——————. Power______________________________________j———^——.Electrode array.-— Electrode spacing- Type of electrode.
CD on ru
in H
*M*fc
fr
ui x
'-f*l
Q'
rtl
roCDN
i
O.
UJcr o Q
NEWTON TWP.
Appro*
82"20'45"
BENTON TWP. M -659
THF TOWNSHIPor
HEENAN
DISTRICT OFSUDBURY
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
SCALE: M NCH 40 CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LAND
CROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED
C.S
©Loc.LO,
M.R.O. S.R.O.
—O—
NOTES
400 Surface rights reservation around the shores of all lakes and rivers.
- MINING LANDS *DATE OF ISSUE
JUL31 1973
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PLAN NO M-925(ATARI*)
MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
4ioi6sw00ea 2.1255 HEENAN 200
C/l
Xm m
h-
cr
v" 1
OJ LO
<
41016SWe068 2 .1265 HEENAN
a AIM y
- - ? w
LOCATION MAP
Scale ' ''p Tiiw
AIM f
T*T
?M
INSTRUMENT' M* Phor M-7OO Serk)l N" 7167
- -4IO Measurement s tation on picket l ine
-140
- -ISO
-670
- -1,280 Relative value of vertical component of earth's magnetic f ield in gammas
--2,680 fl .
-I.4IO
--4SO
A A
Main C ontrol S tation*
Secondary. Base Station
Magnetic Contour
Magnetic Depression
Contour By - J. A. Kelly
Contour Interval.' - 5, 000 .-4,000 , -3 .000 ,-2 , 000 , -l , 000 , Ol .000 , 2 , O OO , 5, OOO , IO, OOO , 20,000 , 3 0 .000 , 40 ,OOO, 50,000 , 60 .000 , 80,000 gamma*
lFALCONBRIDGE NICKEL MINES LTD,
HEENAN PROPERTYHeenan
SUDBURY MINING DIVISION
MAGNETOMETER SURVEY
?0*. 400
vey June 7 3
Fred Blake
Drawn R r ' D E La*t
N O ' 16