study on indian defense industries
TRANSCRIPT
1
LT COL K C MONNAPPA
2
TO ASCERTAIN IF CIVIL INDUSTRIES CANBE ALLOWED TO MANUFACTURE WEAPONS FOR THE MILITARY.
3
STUDY TO FOCUS ON FOLLOWING ISSUES :
WHETHER CIVIL INDUSTRIES BE ALLOWED TO PRODUCE WEAPONS FOR MILITARY.
TYPES OF WEAPONS WHICH CAN BE PERMITTED TO BE PRODUCED BY CIVIL INDUSTRIES.
4
STUDY FOCUSED ON ISSUES AT MACRO LEVEL BEING A FIXED DURATION STUDY
5
1. TO STUDY PRESENT SYSTEM OF PROCUREMENT OF
WEAPON SYSTEMS IN MILITARY.
2. IDENTIFY ROLE & SCOPE OF CIVIL INDUSTRY IN SUBJECT MATTER.
3. STUDY OF RECOMMENDATION S OF VARIOUS COMMITTEES FOR PRIVATISATION.
4. TO IDENTIFY WEAPONS WHICH CAN BE PERMITTED TO BE MANUFACTURED BY CIVIL INDUSTRY FOR MILITARY.
5. TO IDENTIFY CHANGES REQUIRED IN EXISTING POLICY,PROCEDURES & PROCESSES.
6
1. INTERVIEWS.
2. DISCUSSIONS.
3. BRAIN STORMING.
4. STUDY & REVIEW OF LITERATURE.
5. QUESTIONNAIRES & SURVEYS -BOTH OPEN AND CLOSED ENDED.
7
1. REFERENCE MATERIAL - BOOKS, MAGAZINES, OFFICIAL
DOCUMENTS & WEB SITES OF DPSUs& OFCs.
2. KELKAR COMMITTEE REPORT.
3. SENGUPTA COMMITTEE REPORT.
4. CII – KPMG SURVEY REPORT. 5. REVIEW OF DPP, DPM & JSG.
6. INTERACTION WITH OFFICERS AND CONCERNED PBOR OF 12
ARTILLERY BRIGADE UNITS,OTHER STATION UNITS OF NASIRABAD & JODHPUR.
7. QUESTIONNAIRES & INTERVIEWS.
8
PHASE – I : PRESENT SYSTEM OF DEFENCE
PROCUREMENT. PHASE – II : WHETHER CIVIL INDUSTRIES BE
ALLOWED TO PRODUCE WEAPONS FOR MILITARY ? PHASE – III : TYPES OF WEAPONS WHICH CAN BE PERMITTED TO BE PRODUCED BY CIVIL INDUSTRIES ? PHASE – IV : RECOMMENDATIONS & CHANGES REQUIRED IN PRESENT SYSTEM. PHASE – V : CONCLUSION.
9
10
PREVIEW : PHASE – I
11
13
GLOBAL ANNUAL GROWTH IN DEFENCE EXPENDITURE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
GLOBAL DEFENCE MARKET: OPPORTUNITY FOR INDIA
22
23
24
25
AIRFORCE
Weapon system Deal Size in USD Offset Size Deal Status RFP Type Bidders/
Expected
Bidders
127 Multi Mission
Role Combat
Aircrafts
10,000 MN 50% Field trial being
conducted
Buy & Make
(Global)
Lockheed Martin ,
Boeing,
Dassault, UAC,
EADS, Saab
Gripen
6 Transport
Aircrafts
1,000 MN 30% Nomination
Based.Trials is
expected to take
place in 2012,
prior to formal
induction.
Buy Global NA
12 Heavy lift
Helicopter
700 MN 30% Tender released
on 26 May 2009
Buy & Make
(Global)
Boeing, Sikorsky,
Bell,
Westland,
Eurocopter, Mil-
MI Design
bureau.
26
ARMY
Weapon system Deal Size in USD Offset Size Deal Status RFP Type Bidders/
Expected
Bidders
197 Light
Observations/Utilit
y
Helicopters
3,000 MN 50% Tender released
in 2008 after
cancellation of
previous tender of
2004.
Buy & Make
(Global)
Elbit, Thales,
Marconi,
Motorola,
Ericsson,
Raytheon,
Honeywell
Future Infantry
Soldier
as a System
(F-INSAS)
1,100 MN 30% Tender released
by DRDO. Global
tender issued by
MoD in April 2008
Buy Global Elbit, Thales,
Marconi,
Motorola,
Ericsson,
Raytheon,
Honeywell
Howitzers 2,170 MN 30% The Army at this
stage has plans to
phase the 105
MM field gun
Buy & Make
(Global)
NA
27
NAVY
Weapon system Deal Size in USD Offset Size Deal Status RFP Type Bidders/
Expected
Bidders
7 Scorpene
Submarines
3,500 MN 30% Tender to be
issued
Buy & Make
(Global)
Companies
engaged in
electronics,
weapon control,
fire control,
navigation
systems, turbine
engine
manufacturing,
generators,
standoff weapon
systems.
12 Stealth
Frigates
7,600 MN 30% RFP to be issued Buy & Make
(Global)
Similar to above
16 Multi Role
Helicopter (MRH)
1,000 MN 30% Issue of tender-
10 Aug 2008
Buy & Make
(Global)
Finmeccanica &
others
28
1. SHORTCOMINGS OBSERVED POST KARGIL CONFLICT .
2. INTEGRATED DEFENCE STAFF (IDS) MADE RESPONSIBLE FOR :
A. PREPARATION OF BOTH SHORT TERM (SCAP & AAP) AND LONG TERM
PERSPECTIVE PLANNING(LTIPP).
B. RECEIVING AND PRIORITISING EQUIPMENT
REQUIREMENTS FROM SERVICES.
3. ROLES WERE REDIFINED FOR FOLLOWING:
A. DAC (DEFENCE ACQUISITION COUNCIL ) - PRINCIPAL APPROVAL OF
CAPITAL ACQN IN LTIPP,IDEN & APPROVE ‘BUY OR BUY & MAKE’
PROCEDURES.
B. DEFENCE PROCUREMENT BOARD(DPB) - DEALS WITH REVENUE
CAPITAL,APPROVES AAP PROCEDURE. ALSO DEALS WITH SINGLE VENDOR
CASES & FAST TRACK PROCEDURES (FTP).
C. ACQUISITION WING - THREE DIVISIONS FOR LAND,SEA & AIR WITH EACH
RESPONSIBLE FOR ENTIRE CAPITAL PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE. 29
PROCUREMENT TIMELINE
Timelines Authorities Involved Actions Taken
1 Month SHQ, HQ IDS, DPB,
Acquisition Wing of
MoD
Commenced by the issue of RFI laying down only “Essential parameters”
and not the “desirable parameters”
SHQ compiles the comments of the DDP, DRDO, MOD (Finance), MOD
(Admin) and forwards the same to the HQ IDS
4 Months SHQ - Service
Headquarters
DAC - Defence
Acquisition Council
SCAPCHC - Service
Capital Acquisition
Plan Categorisation
Higher Committee
Lays down following requirements:
Quantity, time frame, offset obligation, training, maintenance etc
Technical parameters, field evaluation on No-Cost-No-Commitment basis
Commercial aspects including payment terms, guarantee/warranty
Criteria for evaluation and acceptance
11 – 17
Months
Technical Evaluation
Committee (TEC)
SHQ, DRDO, DGQA,
Acquisition Wing of
MoD
Evaluation of proposals and preparation of TEC report
Vetting of report by Technical Manager and acceptance by Directorate
General Acquisition DG (Acq.)
Field trials/ DGQA/ maintainability trials, preparation and approval of staff
evaluation at SHQ and acceptance of the same by DG (Acq.)
30
PROCUREMENT TIMELINE
Steps Timelines Authorities Involved Actions Taken
Commercial
Negotiations
4 – 11
months
Technical
Oversight
Committee
Commercial
Negotiation
Committee
Competent
Financial
Authority, MoD,
MoF, Cabinet
Committee on
Security (CCS)
Technical Oversight Committee involved for cases over INR 300
Cr.
Opening of bids and determination of L1
Contracts Negotiation Committee (CNC) negotiations,
finalisation of CNC report
Approval of Competent Fianance Authority (CFA) – MoD, MoF,
CCS
Evaluation of commercial offset offers
Contract
Signing
Thus the cumulative process takes around 20-34 months
31
32
33
DPP 2002 – 03 •INTRODUCED AFTER KARGIL CONFLICT TO FORMALISE PROCUREMENT PROCESS BY MoD •APPLICABLE TO PROCUREMENTS FLOWING OUT OF ‘BUY’ DECISION OF THE DAC •DOCUMENT REVISED IN 2003 TO INCLUDE PROCUREMENTS UNDER ‘BUY AND MAKE’ CATEGORY
DPP 2006 •EXTENDED TO INCLUDE PROCUREMENTS UNDER THE FTP, ‘MAKE’ CATEGORY AND PROCEDURE FOR INDIGENOUS WARSHIP BUILDING •CONCEPT OF OFFSETS INTRODUCED; ENVISAGED USD 10 BN TO FLOW BACK BETWEEN 2007-2012 •TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY ENVISAGED IN THE ‘BUY’ CATEGORY •LEVEL PLAYING FIELD BETWEEN DPSUS AND RURS ADDRESSED •DECISION TAKEN TO REVIEW THE DPP AFTER EVERY TWO YEARS
DPP 2008 •INTRODUCED CONCEPT OF OFFSET BANKING; ALLOWING VENDORS TO DISCHARGE THEIR OFFSET CREDITS AGAINST RFPS ISSUED WITHIN TWO FINANCIAL YEARS OF DATE OF APPROVAL OF BANKED CREDITS •REMOVAL OF OFFSET OBLIGATION FOR CONTRACTS WITH AT LEAST 50 PERCENT INDIGENOUS CONTENT •INCR OFFSET OBLIGATION TO 50 PERCENT ON A PER CASE BASIS CHANGE IN LICENSING POLICY, WITH A PRIVATE COMPANY REQUIRING LICENSE ONLY IF STIPULATED UNDER LICENSING REQUIREMENT FOR DEFENCE INDUSTRY, ISSUED BY MINISTRY OF COMMERCE •INCREASED INFORMATION PROVIDED DURING ISSUE OF RFPS •OFFSET PENALTY INTRO FOR
INDIAN PRIME IN ‘BUY (GLOBAL)’ TENDERS
DPP AMENDMENT 2009 •INTRODUCED A NEW CATEGORY OF PROCUREMENT – “BUY AND MAKE (INDIAN)” TO ISSUE RFPS TO ONLY INDIAN VENDORS WHO HAVE THE REQUISITE FINANCIAL AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES •PUBLIC VERSION OF LTPP COVERING A PERIOD OF 15 YEARS TO BE WIDELY PUBLICISED •ENHANCEMENT OF ROLE OF INDEPENDENT MONITORS IN INTEGRITY PACT •LIBERALISATION IN OFFSET PROVISIONS BY PERMITTING
CHANGE IN OFFSET PARTNER
DPP 2011 •NEW SECTION ON GUIDELINES FOR SHIP BUILDING TO INCREASE COMPETITIVENESS •THE SCOPE OF OFFSET POLICY GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN EXPANDED TO INCLUDE CIVIL AEROSPACE, INTERNAL SECURITY AND TRAINING
34
THE GOVERNMENT HAD SET UP THE KELKAR COMMITTEE IN 2004
AIM
TO EXAMINE AND RECOMMEND CHANGES NEEDED IN DEFENCE ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
ENABLING A GREATER PARTICIPATION OF PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEFENCE PRODUCTION
STRENGTHENING SELF-RELIANCE IN DEFENCE PREPAREDNESS.
THE COMMITTEE SUBMITTED ITS REPORT IN TWO PARTS.
THE FIRST PART OF THE REPORT, SUBMITTED IN APRIL 2005
FOCUSED ON THE REVIEW OF THE DEFENCE PROCUREMENT PROCEDURE
MADE SEVERAL RECOMMENDATIONS LINKED TO THE ISSUE OF ENHANCING INDIGENOUS
PRODUCTION.
SECOND PART OF THE COMMITTEE’S REPORT WAS SUBMITTED TO MOD IN NOV 2005.
THE COMMITTEE HAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD GIVE GREATER FREEDOM
TO THE PSUS TO FORM JOINT VENTURES AND CONSORTIUMS.
THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF THE SOUTH KOREAN MODEL TO IDENTIFY RAKSHA
UDYOG RATNA (RUR) ON THE BASIS OF THEIR PERFORMANCE.
35
PREPARATION OF A 15-YEAR LONG-TERM PLAN, FORMING THE BASIS FOR AN ACQUISITION PROGRAMME
INFORMATION SHARING OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARMED FORCES WITH THE INDUSTRY
IDENTIFICATION OF ENTRY POINTS FOR THE PRIVATE SECTOR IN THE ACQUISITION PROCESS
ACCREDITATION AND FOSTERING OF RAKSHA UDYOG RATNA /CHAMPION
EVOLVE POLICY FRAMEWORK TO PROMOTE PARTICIPATION OF SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES IN DEFENCE PRODUCTION
SETTING UP A NEW PROFESSIONAL AGENCY FOR DEFENCE ACQUISITION
PROVIDING DEFENCE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, BOTH TO THE DRDO AND THE INDUSTRY
PROMOTING TRANSPARENCY IN DECISION MAKING.
ENCOURAGING OPTIMUM UTILIZATION OF EXISTING CAPACITY.
WORKING OUT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO INCLUDE AN OFFSET CLAUSE FOR CONTRACTS VALUED AT RS. 300 CRORES AND ABOVE.
RE-EXAMINING THE CONCEPT OF NEGATIVE LIST FOR DEFENCE EXPORTS AND SETTING UP OF AN EXPORT MARKETING ORGANISATION.
36
37
Ser No
Company Sales (INR
Mn)
Products/Services
1 Hindustan
Aeronautics
Limited (HAL)
86,250 Design, development, manufacture, repair and overhaul of aircraft,
helicopters, engines and their accessories
2 Bharat Electronics
Limited
(BEL)
41,025 Design, development and manufacture of sophisticated state-or-the-art
electronic equipment components for
the use of the defence services, para-military organisations and other
government users
3 Bharat Earth Movers
Ltd
(BEML)
27,133 Multi-product company engaged in the design and manufacture of a
wide range of equipment including
specialised heavy vehicles for defence and re-engineering solutions in
automotive and aeronautics
4 Mazagon Dock
Limited
(MDL)
23,217 Submarines, missile boats, destroyers, frigates and corvettes for the
Indian Navy
5 Garden Reach
Shipbuilders
& Engineers Ltd
(GRSE)
5,566 Builds and repairs warships and auxiliary vessels for the Indian Navy
and the Coast Guard
6 Bharat Dynamics
Limited
(BDL)
4,543 Missiles, torpedo counter measure system, counter measures
dispensing system
7 Mishra Dhatu Nigam
Limited (MIDHANI)
2,550 Aeronautics, space, armaments, atomic energy, navy special products
like molybdenum wires and plates,
titanium and stainless steel tubes, alloys etc.
8 Goa Shipyard Ltd
(GSL)
269 Builds a variety of medium size, special purpose ships for the defence ,
Indian Coast Gaurd (ICG) and civil
sectors
38
39
1. A PARADIGM SHIFT IN STRUCTURE OF DEFENCE INDUSTRY.
2. PRIVATE PLAYERS NO LONGER RESTRICTED TO SUPPLYING RAW MATERIALS, SEMI-FINISHED PRODUCTS, PARTS AND COMPONENTS TO DPSUs AND OFCs.
3. ALLOWED MANUFACTURE OF MORE ADVANCED DEFENCE EQUIPMENT AND SYSTEMS.
PARTICIPATION OF PRIVATE SECTOR IN DEFENCE INDUSTRY
40
4. IN TERMS OF MARKET SHARE, PRIVATE SECTOR STILL AT A NASCENT STAGE.
5. UNDER THIS POLICY ALL DEFENCE RELATED ITEMS WERE REMOVED FROM THE RESERVED CATEGORY AND TRANSFERRED TO LICENSED CATEGORY.
6. 100 PERCENT PRIVATE SECTOR OWNERSHIP PERMISSIBLE AND FDI UP TO 26 PERCENT.
PARTICIPATION OF PRIVATE SECTOR DEFENCE INDUSTRY
41
7. APPROXIMATELY 70 PERCENT OF INDIAN DEFENCE PROCUREMENT COMING FROM OVERSEAS SOURCES.
8. OF THE 30 PERCENT OF ORDERS PLACED IN INDIA, ONLY AN ESTIMATED 9 PERCENT ATTRIBUTED DIRECTLY TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
9. PRIVATE SECTOR ACCOUNTS FOR 25 PERCENT OF THE COMPONENTS PROVIDED TO DPSUs.
PARTICIPATION OFPRIVATE SECTOR IN DEFENCE INDUSTRY
42
10. ENJOY A 14 PERCENT SHARE IN OVERALL MARKET. 11. DEFENCE MARKET IS ESTIMATED TO BE WORTH USD
700 MILLION . 12. EXPECTED TO INCREASE WITH GROWING
PARTICIPATION OF PRIVATE PLAYERS.
13. MAJOR INDIAN INDUSTRIAL HOUSES LIKE THE TATA GROUP, MAHINDRA GROUP, KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS AND LARSEN AND TOUBRO HAVE DIVERSIFIED IN TO DEFENCE PRODUCTION.
14. JOINT VENTURES ON BOTH STRATEGIC AND PRODUCT SPECIFIC BASES.
PARTICIPATION OF PRIVATE SECTOR DEFENCE INDUSTRY
43
COMPANY YEAR OF
INCEPTION OF
DEFENCE
OPERATIONS
PRODUCTS/SERVICES
TATA ADVANCED SYSTEMS
LIMITED (TAS)
2007 DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND SUPPLY OF COMPOSITE
COMPONENTS, SUB-ASSEMBLIES FOR APPLICATIONS IN
AEROSPACE DIVISION AND SOLUTIONS FOR PERSONAL
ARMOUR, VEHICLE ARMOUR AND SPECIAL
APPLICATIONS
LARSEN AND TOUBRO - DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF
INTEGRATED LAND BASED /NAVAL COMBAT/MISSILE
SYSTEMS, DEFENCE ELECTRONICS & CONTROL
SYSTEMS AND INTEGRATED NAVAL ENGINEERING
SYSTEMS
KIRLOSKAR BROTHERS - INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (WATER SUPPLY, POWER
PLANTS, IRRIGATION), PROJECT AND ENGINEERED
PUMPS, INDUSTRIAL PUMPS
MAHINDRA DEFENCE SYSTEMS 2001 TOTAL SOLUTIONS FOR THE RANGE OF LIGHT
COMBAT/ARMOURED VEHICLES, SIMULATORS FOR
WEAPONS & WEAPON SYSTEMS, SEA MINES, SMALL
ARMS, VARIANTS AND ASSOCIATED AMMUNITION.
ASHOK LEYLAND 1970s DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF
SPECIAL VEHICLES, SERVING INDIAN ARMED FORCES
AND INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMERS SUCH AS US ARMY
44
1. MSMEs ARE DEPENDENT ON OUTSOURCING .
2. MSMEs PROVIDE COMPONENTS TO DPSUs AND LARGE PRIVATE PLAYERS.
3. DPSUs AND ORDNANCE FACTORIES OUTSOURCE 20-25 PERCENT OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS TO THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
4. OUT OF OUTSOURCING, APPROXIMATELY 25 PERCENT REQUIREMENT MET BY MSMEs.
45
1. OFFSETS INTRODUCED IN INDIA IN DPP 2006 AS A POLICY TO PROMOTE INDIGENISATION OF INDIAN DEFENCE INDUSTRY.
2. UNDER CURRENT POLICY:
A. PROCUREMENTS OVER Rs. 3 BILLION IN ‘BUY (GLOBAL)’ AND ‘BUY AND MAKE ‘.
B. AN OFFSET OBLIGATION OF A MINIMUM OF 30 PERCENT OF PROCUREMENT VALUE.
46
47
48
49
PREVIEW : PHASE – II
1. WAR ON TERROR & IS SITUATION.
2. INDO-PAK RELATIONS.
3. SINO-INDIA RELATIONS.
4. INDIA’S RELATIONS WITH OTHER NEIGHBOURS.
5. PEACE PROCESS IN AFGHANISTAN.
6. UNITED NATIONS & SECURITY STRUCTURE.
7. COMPETITION FROM EMERGING MARKETS.
1. ORDNANCE FACTORIES. 2. DPSUs. 3. R &D THROUGH DRDOs LAB. 4. THROUGH IMPORTS. 5. SOME SPARES THROUGH CIVIL
INDUSTRIES.
1. EXPERIENCED POOL OF SCIENTIESTS.
2. INPLACE INFRASTRUCTURE.
3. WORLD CLASS MISSILE TECHNOLOGY AND SPACE RESEARCH.
4. IT SAVVY POPULATION.
5. WORLD CLASS TECH INSTITUTIONS.
1. LACK OF PARTICIPATING CIVIL
INDUSTRIES.
2. FAILING PUBLIC SECTOR.
3. VESTED INTERESTS.
4. NO MIC.
5. SINO-RUSSIAN RELATIONS.
6. NON-ALIGNMENT OF PUBLIC AND CIVIL
INDUSTRIES.
7. INADEQUATE SPARES AND UPGRADATION.
8. TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AND
VULNERABILITY.
9. OBSOLESENCE OF CURRENT EQUIPMENT.
STRENGTH
• EXISISTING INFRASTRUCTURE.
• SKILLED LABOUR.
• SCOPE OF EXPANSION.
OPPORTUNITIES
• CREATION OF MORE JOBS.
• ALIGNING WITH CIVIL INDUSTRIES.
WEAKNESSES
• INSUFFICIENT & INFLEXIBLE INFRASTRUCTURE.
• CHANGE CONSUMES TIME & CAPITAL.
• LACK OF MOTIVATION-POOR HR POLICIES.
THREATS
• JOB INSECURITIES FOR EXISTING LABOUR.
SWOT ANALYSIS : ORDNANCE FACTORIES
STRENGTH
• LARGE NO OF SUCCESSFUL PROJECTS.
• HIGHLY SKILLED TEAM OF SCIENTISTS.
• LARGE NUMBER OF READY LABS ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
OPPORTUNITIES
• LARGE SCOPE OF EXPANSION OF R&D.
• LARGE SCOPE OF SALE OF R&D.
WEAKNESSES
• DELAYED PROJECTS RESULT IN HY IMPORTS.
• LACK OF INDIGENOUS TECH.
• REQUIRES PRODUCTION UNITS.
THREATS
• EVER CHANGING GSQRs.
• BANS.
• TRANSFER OF TECH.
SWOT ANALYSIS : DRDO
STRENGTH
• EXISISTING INFRASTRUCTURE.
• SKILLED LABOUR.
OPPORTUNITIES
• CREATION OF MORE JOBS.
• EXPANSION OF INDUSTRIES.
• TOT.
WEAKNESSES
• LARGE GAP IN PRODUCTION AFTER APPROVAL RESULTS IN HY IMPORTS.
• LACK OF TECH.
• DEPENDENT ON SUBSIDIES/GRANTS.
THREATS
• LOSS OF PROJECTS.
SWOT ANALYSIS : DPSUs
STRENGTH
• SUCCESS STORY FOR INDIA.
• INDIGINISATION.
• LARGE NUMBER OF INDUSTRY AVLB ACROSS COUNTRY.
• SKILLED & MOTIVATED LABOUR.
• HIGH TECH AVLB.
OPPORTUNITIES
• LARGE SCOPE OF EXPANSION GLOBALLY.
• EASIER TOT THROUGH JV.
• AVLB OF TECH THROUGH DRDO.
WEAKNESSES
• LACK OF SPECIALISED INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT.
• LACK OF EXPERIENCE.
• VERY LIMITED DOMESTIC CUSTOMER BASE.
• EXPORTS– PRESENTLY AN ABSTRACT IDEA.
THREATS
• ACCESS TO SENSITIVE INFO.
• PROFIT CENTRIC.
• GREATER SHARE BY FOREIGN COLLABRATORS.
• MORE LOBBYING.
• RISK WPN PROLIFERATION AND WAR.
SWOT ANALYSIS : CIVIL INDUSTRIES
STRENGTH
• SUCCESSFUL PAST PROJECTS.
• INPLACE INFRASTRUCTURE.
• EXPERINCED WORKERS AND SCIENTIESTS.
OPPORTUNITIES
• IMMENSE SCOPE OF EXPANSION.
• LARGE SCOPE OF OFFSET & STRENGTHENING OF DOMESTIC MARKET.
• LARGE SCOPE OF R & D
WEAKNESSES
• DELAYED PROJECTS.
• CHANGING GSQRs.
• LACK OF LATEST TECHNOLOGY.
• VESTED INTERESTS.
• LIMITED R & D.
THREATS
• OBSOLETE EQUIPMENT.
• LAGGING BEHIND IN TECH & WEAPON RACE.
• AFFECTS PREPAREDNESS FOR WAR.
SWOT ANALYSIS : GOVT-PUBLIC
STRENGTH
• ONLY LTD ADDL INFRASTUCTURE IS REQUIRED.
• TECH DEFI REDUCED.
• MOTIVATED & SKILLED LABOUR.
• GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE.
• BEST OF EVERYTHIG AVLB.
OPPORTUNITIES
• LARGE DEFENCE MARKET AVLB ABINITIO.
• INDIGINISATION CAN BE MAXIMISED.
• READY MADE R&D AVL THROUGHDRDO.
• EASIER TOT THROUGH JV FOR BAL TECH.
• INCREASED EXPORTS GLOBALLY.
• GREATER OFFSETS.
WEAKNESSES
• PROFIT CENTRIC.
THREATS
• ACCESS TO SENSITIVE INFO.
• JV & FOREIGN COLLABORATION REQUIRES INCREASE IN FDI CEILING.
• MORE LOBBYING FOR SALE OF WEAPONS.
• RISK WAR AND WEAPON PROLIFERATION.
SWOT ANALYSIS : GOVT-PUBLIC-CIVIL
68
SHOULD CIVIL INDUSTRIES BE ALLOWED TO MANUFACTURE WPNS FOR THE MILITARY?
60%
40%
YES
NO
QUERY POSED AS PART OF QUESTIONNAIRE TO RESPONDENTS FROM DRDO
SHOULD CIVIL INDUSTRIES BE ALLOWED TO MANUFACTURE WPNS FOR THE MILITARY?
100%
YES
QUERY POSED AS PART OF QUESTIONNAIRE TO RESPONDENTS FROM ASSOCHAM AND CII
1. BRISK BUSINESS BY PRIVATE FIRMS WORLD OVER.
2. REVITALIZE OWN DEFENCE INDUSTRIES.
3. SAVING FOREX.
4. TECHNOLOGY SPILLOVER.
5. CAPITAL INVESTMENTS.
6. CREATION OF JOBS.
7. REDUCTION IN IMPORTS.
8. SELF RELIANCE.
9. ALIGNING PUBLIC- CIVIL INDUSTRIES.
1. JOINT VENTURES – CAPITAL, TECHNOLOGY AND CAPABILITY.
2. EASY WAY FOR TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY.
3. INFLATED PRICES BY FOREIGN FIRMS.
4. ISROs EXPERIENCE.
5. DEVELOP INDIGENOUS QUALITY EXPERTISE.
76
77
PREVIEW : PHASE –III
78
REQUIREMENT OF WEAPON SYSTEMS
EXTREMELY HIGH RATE OF SUCCESS OF HIGH TECH
WEAPONS IN PRESENT DAY WARS DICTATES NEED TO
DEVELOP/ACQUIRE TECHNOLOGY THAT IS IMPORTANT
TO FUTURISTIC REQUIREMENTS.
0% 5%
10% 15%
20% 25%
RADARS & UAV
COMBAT SYSTEM
COMN SYSTEM
ROCKET & MISSILE SYS
DIRECTED ENERGY WPNS
ADVANCED MTRL TECH
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
ROBOTICS
NANO TECH
BIOTECH
WHAT KIND OF WPN SYS ARE REQUIRED IN THE FUTURE?
1. BATTLE FIELD TRANSPARENCY
2. COMBAT SYSTEM
3. COMN SYSTEM
4. ROCKET & MISSILE SYSTEM
5. DIRECTED ENERGY WPNS
6. ADVANCED MATERIAL TECH
7. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
8. ROBOTICS
9. NANO TECH
10. BIOTECH
RECONNAISSANCE TECHNOLOGY HAS ABILITY TO PLOT OUT ENEMY POSITIONS TO A ‘T’ FOR UN-MANNED VEHICLE/STEALTH AIR. CRAFT TO ENGAGE.
FUTURE WAR WILL CONSIST ONLY OF THOUSANDS OF ROBOTS & UN-MANNED VEH.
1. BATTLE FIELD SURVEILLANCE RADARS.
2. WEAPON LOCATING RADARS.
3. UAVs WITH ADVANCED SENSORS.
4. FUTURISTIC ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS.
DOMINATOR UAV
FLYBOT
FIRE SCOUT – UAV HELICOPTER
MQ9 REAPER – PREDATOR UAV
HUNTER UAV AIRSTRIKE – VIPER AIR ATTACK
97
ltipp
98
AREAS OF EXCELLENCE OF CIVIL INDUSTRY
1. IT.
2. MISSILE & SPACE TECHNOLOGY.
3. ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION TEHNOLOGY.
WHAT KIND OF WPNS SHOULD THE CIVIL INDUSTRIES MANUFACTURE FOR THE MILITARY?
5% 10%
85%
NO WPNS
SOME WPNS
ALL WPNS
QUERY POSED AS PART OF QUESTIONNAIRE TO RESPONDENTS FROM ARMY
WHAT KIND OF WPNS SHOULD THE CIVIL INDUSTRIES MANUFACTURE FOR THE MILITARY?
95%
3% 2%
NO WPNS
SOME WPNS
ALL WPNS
QUERY POSED AS PART OF QUESTIONNAIRE TO RESPONDENTS FROM DRDO
101
102
WEAPONS SYSTEMS RECOMMENDED FOR MANUFACTURING BY CIVIL INDUSTRY
CIVIL INDUSTRY BE PERMITTED TO MANUFACTURE ALL WEAPON SYSTEMS EXCEPT NUCLEAR WEAPONS.
103
SHORT TERM EXPECTATIONS FROM CIVIL INDUSTRY
1. COMBAT SYSTEMS. 2. ELECTRONICS & COMN SYSTEM. 3. ROCKETS & MISSILE.
107
LONG TERM PLANS
1. DIRECTED ENERGY WPNS.
2. ADVANCED MATERIAL TECH.
3. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.
4. ROBOTICS.
5. NANO TECH.
6. BIOTECH.
108
WHAT CHANGES ARE REQUIRED TO BOOST CIVIL INDUSTRIES PARTICIPATION IN DEFENCE
MANUFACTURING?
20%
25%
30%
25%
FDI
OFFSET
TAXATION
TRANSPARENCY
QUERIES POSED TO RESPONDENTS FROM ASSOCHAM AND CII
IS THERE A NEED TO INCREASE THE FDI LIMIT?
57%
17%
26%
YES
MAYBE
NO
QUERIES POSED TO RESPONDENTS FROM ASSOCHAM AND CII
DO DPSUS HAVE AN EDGE OVER PRIVATE INDUSTRIES IN PROCURING DEFENCE
CONTRACTS?
85%
10% 5%
YES
MAYBE
NO
QUERIES POSED TO RESPONDENTS FROM ASSOCHAM AND CII
ARE YOU SATISFIED WITH INDIA’S OFFSET POLICY?
47%
24%
29%
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
QUERIES POSED TO RESPONDENTS FROM ASSOCHAM AND CII
ALLOW SINGLE SOURCE COMPETITION WHERE APPROPRIATE.
DEFENCE UNDERSPENDS COULD BE ADDRESSED THROUGH ROLLING BUDGETS.
GOVERNMENT SHOULD COME UP WITH A NATIONAL OFFSET POLICY MUCH BROADER IN SCOPE.
CONCEPT OF MULTIPLIERS IN OFFSETS TO ENCOURAGE INWARD INVESTMENT OF SOUGHT AFTER TECHNOLOGIES MUST BE INTRODUCED.
TOT NEEDS INCLUSION IN OFFSET POLICY.
DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE AND BROAD RANGING INDUSTRIALISATION STRATEGY FOR DEFENCE TO INCLUDE RAKSHA UDYOG RATNAS(RURs) OR CHAMPIONS OF DEFENCE AND MSMEs.
ENSURE A LEVEL PLAYING FIELD BETWEEN DPSUs & PRIVATE PLAYERS.
CONTINUE TO USE DPSUs IN AREAS WHERE THEY HAVE ALREADY CREATED SUBSTANTIAL CAPABILITIES.
115
► SUPPLIES OF EQUIPMENT MACHINERY,SPARES,TOOLS ETC. MEANT FOR ARMED FORCES OR DEFENCE ESTABLISHMENTS SHOULD BE EXEMPTED FROM APPLICABLE DUTIES.
► DEFENCE SECTOR SHOULD BE GRANTED SIGNIFICANT CONCESSIONS UNDER SERVICE TAX ANALOGOUS TO THOSE ENVISAGED UNDERCUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE LAWS.
GOVERNMENT MAY CONSIDER ESTABLISHMENT OF DEDICATED SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES (SEZS).
CLEARANCE OF GOODS AND SERVICES FROM SEZS UNITS TO THE INDIAN DEFENCE SECTOR SHOULD BE TREATED AS DEEMED EXPORTS AND REVENUE FROM SUCH DOMESTIC SALES SHOULD BE COUNTED TOWARDS FULFILMENT OF THEIR EXPORT OBLIGATION.
GOVERNMENT SHOULD CONSIDER EXEMPTING JVS FORMED UNDER OFFSETS OR FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WORK IN THE DEFENCE SECTOR FROM LEVY OF R & D CESS.
COMPUTATION OF PROFITS FOR ENTITIES
OPERATING IN THE DEFENCE SCETOR MAY BE
PROVIDED.
EXPENDITURE ON PURCHASE, LEASE OR
RENTAL OF LAND/LAND RIGHTS, CAPITAL
EXPENDITURE, EXPENDITURE BEFORE
COMMENCEMENT OF BUSINESS ETC BE ALLOWED.
INCREASE FDI CAP FROM 26% TO 49% TO ENCOURAGE BETTER INVESTMENT
AND TRANSFER OF TECHNOLOGY.
1. INVOLVE CIVIL INDUSTRY IN MANUFACTURE
OF WEAPON SYSTEMS FROM ‘IDEA’ STAGE.
2. GSQRs SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED FROM TIME
TO TIME.
3. DIPLOMACY SHOULD LOOK FOR MARKETS
FOR GOOD QUALITY BUT CHEAPER WEAPON
SYSTEMS IN UNDERDEVELOPED/DELELOPING
COUNTRIES.
4. REVERSE ENGINEERING SHOULD HELP US OUT.
5. ABSORB TOT IN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY.
6. ALLOW EXPORTS.
7. REQUIREMENT OF A REGULATORY BODY.
4. QUALITY CONTROL & VARIOUS CHECKS.
122
123