study of g production in association with jets using the cms detector
DESCRIPTION
July 21, 2011. Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector. Michael Anderson. Outline. Standard Model of Particle Physics Events of photon + jets Large Hadron Collider Compact Muon Solenoid Detector Detector/Physics Simulation Measuring Jets and Photons - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Study of g production in association with jets using
the CMS detector
Michael Anderson
July 21, 2011
![Page 2: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Outline• Standard Model of Particle Physics
• Events of photon + jets
• Large Hadron Collider
• Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
• Detector/Physics Simulation
• Measuring Jets and Photons
• Conclusions
![Page 3: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
3/47Standard Model• Quarks interact via Strong
Force (g), leptons cannot• Quarks, e, m, t interact via
Electromagentic Force (g)• Both quarks and leptons
interact via Weak Force (W, Z)• Quarks are tightly bound can
cannot be detected individually
• Quarks combine to form composite particles– Examples:
Quarks (Fermions)
Leptons (Fermions)
Force Carriers (Bosons)
proton neutron pion
HHiggs
![Page 4: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
4/47Composite Particles• Probing composite particles (like
protons) at high energy will find gluons and “sea” quarks
• All quarks & gluons within hadrons referred to as “partons”
• Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs):– defined as probability density for
finding a particle with a certain momentum fraction, x, at a given momentum transfer
– Must be determined experimentally
– Needed as input to make theoretical predictions
proton
Simplified picture. In high-energy collisions, energy is available for finding “sea” quarks
x = p(parton)/p(hadron)
![Page 5: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
5/47Photons and Jets• Prompt Photons: come directly
from interaction– Energy & position can
be measured accurately– Prompt, Isolated photons
provide good probe of hard-scattering process (like pp collisions)
• Jets: quarks and gluons fragment into collimated collection of hadrons– Must measure jets to
determine momentum of original scattered parton
– Non-prompt photons produced within jets
(“jet”)
Jet example
![Page 6: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
6/47Motivation for g+jets• Motivation for study of
photon+jet events includes:– Test/Validate theoretical
predictions• Cross section calculations are
challenging as the number of jets increases
– Explore new kinematic regions in hadron-hadron collisions
– They are background to pp->Higgs->gg
– Also background for beyond standard model searches
– Ability to constraining PDFs of the proton
– Calibrate jet energy scales
Prompt Photons
Bremsstrahlung Photons
• Prompt photons produced from quark-gluon scattering & quark-anti-quark annihilation• Primary prompt photon background comes from neutral meson decays
![Page 7: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Goal• Goal: measurement of the rate of events in
which a proton-proton collision produces a prompt photon and jets
• Prefer to measure inclusive rate of jets (rate of events with ≥ n jets), and to not correct for acceptance of the detector
![Page 8: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
8/47
Large Hadron Collider
• Circumference of 27 km• In 2010, collided protons with
center-of-mass energy of 7 TeV• Protons are organized into bunches (next slide)
![Page 9: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Proton Collisions at LHC
Luminosity L = particle flux/time
Interaction rate
Cross section, = “effective” area of interacting particles
During 2010 run: Beam energy 3.5 TeV (7 TeV center of mass) Peak Luminosity, L = 2x1032 cm-2s-1
Recorded 36pb-1 of p-p collisions
dNdt
=L
Design Achieved1380 bunch/beam1.3*1011
3.5 TeV1.3*1033 cm-2s-1
![Page 10: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Compact Muon SolenoidSolenoid (3.8T) Muon chambers
Silicon Strip & Pixel Tracker
Electromagnetic Calorimeter Hadronic Calorimeter
Brass/Scintillator
Forward calorimeter
Weight: 12,500 metric tonsDiameter: 15 mLength: 21.5 m
![Page 11: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Compact Muon Solenoid← Surface assembly hall
CMS together underground ↓
Endcap Discs: Designed, assembled & installed by Wisconsin
![Page 12: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
12/47Detector Geometry• Pseudorapidity h = -ln(tan(q/2)
• Another common variable:– Radius: DR = ((Df)2 + (Dh)2)1/2
(used for sizes of jets, for example)
h=0.0
h=inf
h=1.5
h=3.0
One quadrant slice of CMS parallel to proton beam pipe
f=p/2
f=0
Slice of CMS perpendicular to beam pipe
![Page 13: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
13/47Particle Detection• Prompt Photons:
– Deposit of of Energy in ECAL
– Generally isolated from other energy deposits in Tracker, ECAL & HCAL
– Found by clustering energy of ECAL crystals
• Jets– Energy deposit in ECAL & HCAL– With tracks– Found by clustering tracks and
energy deposits in the calorimeters
• Detector returns quantities like transverse momentum, pT, and transverse energy, ET
pp collisionpoint
Slice of CMS perpendicular to proton beam pipe
![Page 14: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Particle Flow Algorithm
• Particles are found using Particle-Flow (PF) Algorithm
• Collects information from all subdetectors– Tracker, ECAL, HCAL, and muon System
• Information from each sub-detector is linked to find individual particles (e,g,m,charged & neutral hadrons)– Example: track is associated with ECAL deposit and so
found an electron • All particles found are then available to be clustered
with jet algorithms– Used “anti-kT” clustering algorithm
![Page 15: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
15/47g+jet Characteristics• Prompt Photon is
generally isolated deposit of energy in ECAL (red)
• Jet is collimated collection of tracks (green), and deposit of energy in the ECAL (red) and HCAL (blue)
• Events with 1 prompt photon and 1 jet have the photon and jet roughly opposite in f Photon
Jet
Slice of CMS perpendicular to beam pipe
![Page 16: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
16/47Silicon Tracker• Measures pT & path of
charged particles within |h| < 2.5
• Strip Tracker– 200 m2 coverage– 10m precision
measurements– 11M electronic channels
• Inner Pixel tracking system– 66M channels
• Used for isolating prompt photons, and finding jets & measuring their pT
![Page 17: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
17/47
h
h=-ln(tan(q/2)
Electromagnetic Calorimeter• Measures energy &
position of electrons and photons within |h| < 3
• PbWO4 crystals, very dense (8.3 g/cm3)– 23 cm long (26 radiation
lengths)– 61K in the barrel, 22 x 22
mm2– 15K in the endcaps, 28 x
28 mm2
• Resolution:
![Page 18: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
18/47Hadronic Calorimeter• Barrel and Endcap:
brass & scintillator• Coverage to || < 3• x =0.087x0.087• Hadron Forward: steel &
quartz fiber: coverage 3 < || < 5
• Also used for isolating photons and finding jets
• Resolution on energy of a single particle:
![Page 19: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
19/47Trigger• Level 1: Hardware trigger operating at bunch crossing rate
(40MHz at design luminosity)– Brings event rate down to 50-100 kHz
• Level 2: – Reconstruction done using High-Level Trigger (HLT) -- computer farm– Reduces rate from Level-1 value of up to 100 kHz to final value of
~300 to 400 Hz– Slower, but determines energies and track momenta to high
precision
![Page 20: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
20/47Level-1 Trigger• ~25 ns bunch
crossings*2.2 interactions/crossing– Not all events can
be stored/processed
• L1 trigger electronics select 50-100 kHz of interesting events
• e/g trigger:– 8 or 12 GeV threshold– ~100% efficient
HF HCAL ECAL RPC CSC DT
PatternComparator
Trigger
RegionalCalorimeter
Trigger
4 m
e, J, ET, HT, ETmiss
Muon Trigger
max. 100 kHz L1 Accept
Global Trigger
Global Muon Trigger
GlobalCalorimeter
Trigger
Local DT Trigger
Local CSC Trigger
DT TrackFinder
CSC TrackFinder
40 M
Hz
pipe
line,
lat
ency
< 3
.2 m
s
Calorimeter Trigger
![Page 21: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Computing• CMS is dependent on computing for transmitting, storing, and processing
data– Every collision event ~0.2MB, and we record ~300 events/s– Needs to be shared with ~2000 collaborators around the world
• Uses “tiered” system to organize responsibilities among many computing facilities around the world– One Tier0: CERN– Several Tier1s: One per country, FNAL in US– Dozens of Tier2s: One is here at UW-Madison
• I was involved with Tier2 responsibilities (production of monte carlo simulations for collaboration, support of end-user analysis…)
Tier0: CERN
Tier1: Fermilab
Tier2: UW-Madison
Many other computing facilities not shown
![Page 22: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Data• Data entirely collected in 2010• Total of 36 pb-1 of high quality data (all subdetectors
working well)• Required events to pass a trigger requiring the presence
of at least one high-energy photon• Trigger required a clustered deposit of energy that passes:
– ET > minimum thresh (20 GeV in early runs, and raised as luminosity increased)
– Ratio of Hadronic E to Electromagnetic E < 0.15– Energy shape ratio (called ‘R9’) < 0.98 in barrel of CMS (to
remove anomalous ‘spikes’ from ionization of APD’s in barrel of CMS)
![Page 23: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
23/47Monte Carlo Predictions• Data is compared to
predictions made by simulations of proton collisions– Simulations are made
by software called Monte Carlo event generators
• Two useful programs used in this analysis:– Pythia: simulates events
of g+1 jet.Pythia can only simulate processes of 2->2.
– Madgraph/Madevent: used to simulate g+n jets (n = 1 to 3).Madgraph does fixed order matrix element calculations of cross sections.Madgraph is interfaced to use Pythia for jet hadronization.
• Both simulators used as input the same parton distribution functions – from the CTEQ collaboration
Example diagram of a generated event
![Page 24: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Analysis Steps• Select events with at least one photon passing
selection, then count number of jets above a pT threshold
• Select signal from data:– Determine fraction of signal & background by fitting a
distribution in which signal & background have different shapes
• Correct for selection efficiency– efficiency = (number of photons passing some selection) / (all
true hard-scattering photons)• Unsmear the measured jet distributions to obtain a
distribution that may be compared directly with theoretical predictions (called “unfolding”)
![Page 25: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
25/47Analysis Flow• Final Plots:
– σ(γ + ≥n jets) / σ(γ + ≥1 jets)– σ(γ + ≥n jets) / σ(γ + ≥(n-1) jets)
• Where:
– Ns=number of events with a prompt photon and n jets
– U=Unsmearing (‘Unfolding’) correction
– ε=Efficiency– Lint = integrated luminosity
Events
Event Selection
Exclusive Njet distributions
Find signal fraction
Correct Njet dist. for efficiency
Unfold Njet dist.
Change Njet binning from exclusive to inclusive
![Page 26: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Event Selection• Pass single photon trigger • Photon passing:
– pT > 75 GeV– |h|<1.4442 or 1.566<|h|<2.5
• Measuring photons is problematic in boundary region
– Energy Isolation [next slide]• Jet, if present:
– pT > 30 GeV– |h| < 2.4– Loose Jet Identification [next slide]
• Standard selection to selection high-quality proton-proton collision events– Removes events where beam interacted with beam pipe– The presence of a vertex close to nominal interaction point (|z|<24cm)
Barrel EndcapEndcap
![Page 27: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011
Tracker
ECALHCAL
Photon Selection• Photon Isolation quantities:
– Sum of energy in cones aligned with a line from primary vertex to center of photon energy deposit in ECAL
– Sums do not include small central region to avoid including photon energy itself
– Radius of cone = 0.4• Selection on isolation sums:
– Track Iso < 2.0 GeV– Ecal Iso < 4.2 GeV– Hcal Iso < 2.2 GeV
• Selection on photon energy itself:– Ratio of Hadronic E to Electromagnetic E < 0.05
To measure isolation of photon, energy is summed around the photon
![Page 28: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
28/47Photon Selection• Isolation sums
around photons– True photons
generally have lower values while Jets have higher values
Remove > 4.2 GeV
Remove > 2.2 GeVRemove > 2.0 GeV
![Page 29: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Jet Selection• Jets are collimated, clustered energy in the
Tracker, ECAL, and HCAL within a maximum cone size of R = 0.5
• Jet selection is very loose, simply to remove noise or anomalous signals
• Additional selection for jets:– Photon must not overlap with jet, DR(jet,lead g) > 0.5– Jets not from the same pp collision were removed by
requiring distance between jet vertex and event vertex < 0.2 cm
Charged Hadron EnergyFraction > 0.0Charged Em Energy Fraction < 0.99
Charged Multiplicity > 0Neutral Hadron Energy Fraction < 0.99
Neutral EmEnergy Fraction < 0.99
![Page 30: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Number of Events• Number of events left after each selection
• Jets leave deposits of energy in ECAL which are background to true photons– Isolation requirements removes a significant
amount of these
Selection Number of EventsEvents in original “Photon” dataset 25 MTrigger passed; Vertex cuts; Photon passing pT and h cuts
645867
Photon passing Iso cuts and H/E cut 51905Jet passing selection & pT(jet)>30 GeV 42248
![Page 31: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
31/47Lead photon; jet pT• pT distribution of lead
photon and lead jet (if found) for both data and Madgraph MC
• Used from Madgraph to scale to data– Madgraph is leading-order
and underestimates yield– Scaled by ~1.6 to better
compare shapes– Will fit to a variable to
determine amount of signal & background in data (shown in 2 slides)
Prompt Photon
Jet
![Page 32: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
32/47Jet Multiplicity• Exclusive number of jets
above pT threshold– Madgraph samples simulated
up to g+3 jets
• pT distribution for 2nd and 3rd leading jet is modeled by Madgraph reasonably well
Jet Multiplicity
2nd Jet pT3rd Jet pT
![Page 33: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
33/47Signal Extraction• To measure number of signal
event must measure fraction of signal in data
• We use a shower-shape variable of the lead photon defined as sum over ECAL crystals in photon’s cluster:
• Where:
• Signal shower shape comes from MC, but background shape comes from data with a sideband selection
Photon in Barrel
Photon in Endcap
![Page 34: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
34/47
Fitting template variable• Fit σiηiη to determine
fraction of signal in data– Used Extended
Maximum-Likelihood fits
– Fits are performed separately in Barrel and Endcap, and for each # of jets
• Jet distributions then scaled by these fractions
Photon in Barrel
Photon in Endcap
![Page 35: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
35/47Signal Fraction• Results of fits to σiηiη
• Signal fraction was found to be generally higher in the barrel
• Too few stats in the endcap for higher jet multiplicity– Used average of lower
multiplicity bins
Number of Jets (with pT>30GeV) Barrel Endcap1 68 ± 1 58 ± 1
2 73 ± 2 54 ± 2
3 73 ± 4 64 ± 6
4 84 ± 8 -
5 80 ± 3 -
![Page 36: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Efficiency Correction• Efficiency = number of prompt photons passing selection /
all prompt photons• Photon isolation selection efficiency depend on number of
jets– Ultimately had to use efficiency from MC for high energy photons,
but checked efficiency from MC against data for low energy photons
• Pure sample of photons is hard to get with amount of data available
• However, electrons & photons leave similar energy deposits in ECAL, so it is reasonable to use sample of electrons to find efficiency– We can use events of ‘pp -> Z -> ee’ for very pure sample of
electrons
![Page 37: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
37/47Tag & Probe Fits• Found photon selection efficiency
using events of pp -> Z -> ee– First, require the presence of
electron passing tight selection– Next, require another electron which
also came from the Z (the invariant mass of the electron pairs satisfy 60 < Minv(ee) < 120 GeV)
• This method is called ‘Tag and Probe’– Tag: Election passing tight selection &
pT>20GeV
– Probe: Electron with pT> 30 GeV– Also counted number of jets
• Fits to invariant mass performed to determine amount of electrons before & after requiring probe electron to pass photon selecton
![Page 38: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
38/47Eff of Loose Photon Iso• Efficiency of
photon selection vs number of jets with pT>30GeV– Using fits to Z mass– For photons with
pT > 30 GeV
• Efficiency decreases by a few % as number of jets increases
N Jets
Data T&P Madgraph T&P
Madgraph g+jets
1 87 ± 1 88 ± 0.1 86 ± 0.12 81 ± 3 85 ± 0.3 79 ± 0.23 - 84 ± 0.8 74 ± 0.44 - - 68 ± 0.8
N Jets
Data T&P Madgraph T&P
Madgraph g+jets
1 90 ± 3 91 ± 0.3 89 ± 0.22 89 ± 7 89 ± 8 85 ± 0.43 - 90 ± 2 83 ± 0.84 - - 80 ± 2
Probe/g in Barrel
Probe/g in Endcap
![Page 39: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
39/47Unsmearing Jet Multiplicity• Due to detector resolution, number
of jets found by detector may differ from number of generated jets
• Must unsmear or ‘unfold’ to remove effects of measurement resolutions, systematic biases, and detection efficiency to determine “true” distribution
• Shown here is a matrix from MC of number of generated jets vs number of measured jets– Called ‘response matrix’
• These are used to unsmear measured number of jets to obtain a distribution that can be compared to theory
• Response matrices here from Pythia and Madgraph signal MC– rows are normalized to they sum to 1
for easy comparison
Madgraph g + jet Response Matrix
![Page 40: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
40/47Unsmearing Jet Multiplicity• Performed unsmearing
using Bayesian (“iterative”) method with 4 iterations
• Unfolding has an effect of a few % at 1 or 2 jet multiplicities, up to 50% at highest multiplicities
![Page 41: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
41/47Incl. Jet Multiplicity• Inclusive jet multiplicity,
ratio of “≥njets” to “≥1jets”
• Data is after all corrections and unfolding
• Madgraph and Pythia comparison are with generated particles before any detector simulation– Data agrees well with
madgraph up to ≥3jets– Pythia only simulates g+1
jet, and simulates showering
![Page 42: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
42/47Incl. Jet Mult Ratio• Inclusive jet multiplicity
ratio of “≥njets” to “≥(n-1)jets”
• Data is after all corrections and unfolding
• Madgraph and Pythia comparison are with generated particles before any detector simulation– Data agrees well with
madgraph up to ≥3jets– Pythia only simulates g+1
jet, and simulates showering
![Page 43: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Systematics• Largest Uncertainty is from uncertainty in jet energy
– Affects the counting of jets above an pT threshold
• Uncertainty of jet energy scale arises from:– Uncertainty in flavor composition between jets used to determine
energy corrections and jets in γ+jets will add ~2% on uncertainty– Subtraction is performed remove 500 MeV to jets in events without
pile–up, so we must add this to systematic uncertainty in jet energy– Uncertainty in energy corrections as function of jet η and pT
• Uncertainty in efficiency of photon selection as function of number of jets
• Uncertainty in signal fraction from different background template selection
![Page 44: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Systematics Details• Systematics on ratio “(njet)/ ((n-1)jet)”
– Jet Energy Scale (+/- 1 to jet energies)– Background Template (different selection for efficiency extraction)– Selection Efficiency (using Pythia vs Madgraph)– Unfolding (using response matrix from Pythia vs Madgraph)
≥2 / ≥1 jets ≥3 / ≥1 jets ≥4 / ≥1 jets ≥5 / ≥1 jetsJES (+/-1) +13/-4 % +23/-5 % +15/-18% +27/-36 %Signal Fraction +4 % +8 % -8 % -10 %Efficiency ±4 % ±4 % ±4 % ±4 %Unfolding -1 % +7 % +8 % +9 %
Total +14/-6 % +26/-6 % +17/-20 % +29/-38 %
≥2 / ≥1 jets ≥3 / ≥2 jets ≥4 / ≥3 jets ≥5 / ≥4 jetsJES (+/-1) +13/-4 % +9/-1 % +7/-13 % +11/-22 %Signal Fraction +4 % +4 % -15 % -3 %Efficiency ±4 % ±4 % ±4 % ±4 %Unfolding +2 % +4 % +1 % -4 %
Total +14/-6 % +11/-1 % +8/-26 % +12/-23 %
![Page 45: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
45/47Jet Multiplicity Results• Inclusive jet multiplicity
agrees well with Madgraph in 2 &3 jet bins, data is higher than Madgraph in higher jet multiplicities– Systematics are higher
for larger number of jets primarily due to jet energy uncertainty
Jet Multiplicity
σ ratio Stat Sys
≥ 2 / ≥1 jets 0.36 ±0.003 +0.05/-0.02≥ 3 / ≥1 jets 0.09 ±0.001 +0.02/-0.005≥ 4 / ≥1 jets 0.02 ±0.005 +0.003/-
0.004≥ 5 / ≥1 jets 0.005 ±0.0003 +0.001/-
0.001
Jet Multiplicity
σ ratio Stat Sys
≥ 2 / ≥1 jets 0.36 0.003 +0.05/0.02≥ 3 / ≥2 jets 0.25 0.004 +0.03/-
0.003≥ 4 / ≥3 jets 0.26 0.007 +0.02/-0.07≥ 5 / ≥4 jets 0.23 0.01 +0.03/-0.05
![Page 46: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Mike AndersonJuly 21, 2011
46/47From W/Z+Jets• Another CMS analysis
found number of jets in events with W or Z
• They also measured ratio of number of events of“x+ ≥n jets” to “x+ ≥(n-1) jets” where x=W or Z
• Mine was the first to use photon + jets
![Page 47: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011Summary• Presented first measurement of jet rate in association with a high-pT
photon• Results with 36pb-1 of data
– Loose photon isolation selection– Jets with pT > 30 GeV, R=0.5, using anti-kT algorithm
• Rates of jets in agreement with Madgraph simulations for ≥1 and ≥2 jets, but higher than predicted for ≥3 and ≥4– This is expected because Madgraph sample used contains matrix elements
for up to g+3jets– Data disagreement with Pythia is also expected because Pythia only
simulates photon+1 jet, and uses showering to create more jets
• Tuned Monte Carlo event generators can be used for new physics searches. Ex:– g+1 jet: background to H->gg– g+jets+missing ET: a signature for super-symmetry
![Page 48: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011
Backup
![Page 49: Study of g production in association with jets using the CMS detector](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062323/568166e5550346895ddb2061/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49/47Mike Anderson
July 21, 2011MC Simulations• Events simulated with MadGraph
– Fixed order matrix element calculations of cross sections– Generates multi-parton processes in hadronic collisions.
• Hadronization simulation performed with Pythia 6– Simulates development of underlying event– Generates jets from hadronization, also simulates parton showers, and initial
and final state radiation• Detector simulated using GEANT4
– Toolkit for the simulation of the passage of particles through matter
Hard scattering
MadGraph
Hadronization, showers, IFSR
PYTHIA
Detector simulation
GEANT4
Reconstruction of event
CMSSW