study of economic viability of using ammonium hydroxide as part replacement of sodium hydroxide in...
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
1/12
STUDY OF ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF USING AMMONIUM HYDROXIDE AS PART
REPLACEMENT OF SODIUM HYDROXIDE IN REGENERATION MEDIA IN WATER
TREATMENT PLANT.
Document by:Bharadwaj
Visit my website
www.engineeringpapers.blogspot.comMore papers and Presentations available on above site
ABSTRACT
Water Treatment Plant in RCF, Chembur, Mumbai supplies polished water to
deaerators, boilers and other downstream plants for generation of HP steam.
Water received either from B.M.C. or from outlet R.O. of Sewage Treatment Plant of
RCF is further treated to make it demineralised water useful for boilers, by removing the
organic impurities and hardness (detail schematic block diagram given in AnnII)by
passing through resins bed. In this cycle of operation the resins get exhausted which
needs regeneration periodically.
Strong base Anion (SBA) resins are usually regenerated using 5 % Sodium Hydroxide
solution (caustic lye ) The consumption is enormous , and is becoming costly affair.
In view of this, it was thought to undertake the study, to find the cost effective substitute
for the above mentioned process.
The role of Anion resin is to remove all anions from the water. Weak base anions can
remove all the anions from the water, except Silica. Silica can be removed only by
Strong base Anion resin. The Silica content of around 0 - 0.02 ppm is only permissible
for preparing H.P. steam. Hence we have to go for combination of WBA & SBA resin.
http://www.engineeringpapers.blogspot.com/http://www.engineeringpapers.blogspot.com/ -
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
2/12
Weak base anion resin requires around 4 % Ammonium Hydroxide solution for
regeneration. We already have Ammonia hence the process can be made cost effective.
Pilot plant was installed to conduct trials at site on identical double packed bed system to
evaluate the performance of the system proposed. The trials were conducted & the
relevant data has been generated.The trials performed on double packed bed system
are successful and are cost effective as Ammonium Hydroxide is partly used as
regenerant.
The paper deals in detail about the design & details of the trial, Quality of water
obtained, Output between regeneration, Reduction in effluent generation, with detail
Economics of the scheme studied.
Water Treatment Plant (WTP) of RCF Ltd, Chembur supplies polished water to deaerators,
boilers of Trombay-V and other downstream plants for generation of High Pressure steam.
At present in WTP, we have three streams, WTP-0, WTP-I &WTP-II having capacity 50 M3/hr,
200 M3/hr, 350 M3/hr respectively. WTP-0 and WTP-II are in line where as W.T.P-I has been kept
as a standby.
Water received from R.O. of Sewage Treatment Plant & in emergency from BMC (Analysis of the
R.O. water as well as BMC water is given in Annexure-1.) is further treated to make it
demineralised water useful for boilers, by removing the organic impurities and hardness by
passing through resins bed. In this cycle of operation the resins get exhausted which needs
regeneration periodically.
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
3/12
Strong base Anion (SBA) resins are usually regenerated using 5 % Sodium Hydroxide solution
(caustic lye) The availability of the Quality material, its dependency for procurement and its cost
effectiveness is becoming difficult.
In view of this, it was thought to undertake the study, to find the cost effective substitute for the
above mentioned process.
The role of Anion resin is to remove all anions from the water. Weak base anions resins are
regenerated by Ammonium hydroxide 4% and can remove all the anions from the water, except
Silica. Silica can be removed only by Strong base Anion resin. The Silica content of around 0 -
0.02 ppm is only permissible for preparing H.P. steam. Hence we have to go for combination of
WBA & SBA resin.
Weak base anion resin requires around 4 % Ammonium Hydroxide solution for regeneration. We
already have Ammonia hence the process can be made cost effective.
Utilization of Ammonium Hydroxide (4 %) as a regenerant media is in practice in some of the
industries as is mentioned in literature. We thought of exploring the possibility of the new system
to be in-corporated in RCF. After primary discussion with plant personnel, it was observed that,
there are only two options,
1. WBA resin to be used in combination with a SBA in a separate vessel.
2. SBA resin along with WBA resin in a single vessel as a layered or starta bed,
We have studied the layout plan of our WTP, due to space constrains in the existing system it is
advisable to go for alternative 2. i.e Double bed (SBA & WBA) system, with slight modifications
with inlet / outlet provision for normal operation & regeneration, where partly NH4OH is used as
regenerant.
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
4/12
Pilot plant was installed (Figure given in Annexure -2 ) to conduct the trials on double packed bed
system to evaluate the performance of the system proposed. The trials were conducted and
monitored round the clock.
Pilot plant set up details ;
Specially fabricated Acrylic Column was used for the trials having ID of 48 mm & height 2.2 mts.
This column was separated equally into two parts by strainer having opening of < 0.2 mm for
keeping both resin in separated condition. Inert resin (4cms thickness) of higher size was put over
the two resin bed so as to reduce the chances of strainer choking. Other details were as follows,
Type of resin Weak Base Anion Strong Base Anion
Resin name A-10X MP A -23
Resin qty ( lits ) 2.0 1.5Bed height (m) Approx. 1.07 0.9
Regenerant used NH4OH NaOH
Regeneration level, gpl 74 60
Regenerant Conc. 4-5% 4-5%
Regeneration mode Counter current Counter current
Regeneration Steps for WBA & SBA :
Steps Liquid
used
Flow
(ml/min)
Volume
(ml)
Time
(min)
Backwash ( Optional ) DGW 100 3000 30WBA Regeneration 5% NH4OH 100 3000 30
WBA Slow rinse DM 100 3000 30
SBA regeneration 4% NaOH 50 1600 32
SBA Slow rinse DM 50 3000 60
Fast rinse DGW 1000 20000 20
Service DGW 1000
Water analysis before starting the trials.
Parameter mg/lit (ppm)Chloride 38.50
Sulphate 2.00
Nitrate 4.00
CO2 7.00
Silica 4.00
Load on WBA i.e EMA ( SO4+NO3+Cl ) 44.50
Load on SBA i.e (Silica +CO2+Cl slippage) 12.00
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
5/12
On the basis of above water analysis the desired output expected from pilot plant is @
3600 lits. i.e 60 Hrs service runs. The desired treated water quality from column outlet
during this trial should be as follows,
Parameter Value
pH < 9
Silica < 0.02 ppm
Conductivity < 20 uS/cm2
Sampling Schedule during the trial were as follows :
The Inlet feed water to column i.e Degasser outlet water analysis was done once in a day
for pH, Conductivity, FMA, Silica & CO2.
The outlet feed analysis was done at 4 hrs intervals during the run for pH, Conductivity &
silica.( 3.00pm, 7.00pm, 11.00pm, 3.00am, 7.00am, 11.00am)
Trial Results are as follows,
Cycle :1 Started on 18/06/08
Date & Time Service flow
( lit/hr)
Anion Outlet parameterspH Cond. (uS/cm2) Silica (ppm) Output (lits)
18/06/08
10.00 am
36 --- 00
03.00 pm 36 8.7 4.0 --- 180
07.00 pm 54 8.0 6.2 --- 396
19/06/08
3.00 am 54 7.4 1.7 --- 828
7.00 am 54 8.4 4.1 1044
3.00 pm 60 8.0 5.0 0.009 1524
11.00 pm 60 8.0 2.5 --- 200420/06/08
3.00 am 60 7.8 2.7 0.009 2244
3.00 pm 60 8.1 3.0 --- 2964
7.00 pm 60 8.1 2.5 --- 3204
21/06/08
3.00 am 60 7.9 2.0 --- 3684
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
6/12
9.00 am 60 8.0 1.6
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
7/12
Inference :
The results obtained during the trials are reproducible.
The operating capacity achieved by using anion strata bed is as per the anticipated value
/ performance.
Initially the Silica analysis was done in Laboratory manually, subsequently, the
Silica analysis was taken on line on Silica analyzer for monitoring the exact Silica
content in the output water.
Cost Benefit Analysis :
Ammonia / Sodium Hydroxide Regeneration:Present Scheme: ACF / SAC / DGT / SBA/ MBProposed scheme: ACF/SAC/DGT/ANION (WBA+SBA) /MB
Present Resin Anion(WBA+SBA)
A 10 XMP
Weak Base Anion
A 23
Strong Base Anion
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
8/12
Standard Flow
m3/hr
200 per vessel 200 for 1 vessel
Ionic LoadPpm as CaCO3
As per data given= CO2 + Silica
+Chloride + Sulphate
=54.68
Ionic loadChloride(38.5) + Nitrate (4.05)
+ Sulphate(1.77)
= 44.36 ppm as CaCO3
Ionic load3.32(Silica) +7(CO2) +2(Cl)
12.32 ppm as CaCO3
Resin Qty(L) 7800 4100 liters for layer bed 3700 liters for packed bed
Regenerant
100 % NaOH percycle
540 kgs 4.10 X 64.8 X1.2 X 0.7
= 223 Kgs NH4OH per cycleper stream
3.7 X60
= 222.0 Kgs NaOH
OBR
(M3)
6000 m3 6000 m3
Number of cycles
per year
300 X 24/34
211.76 cycles
300 X 24/34
= 211.76 cycles
300 X 24/44
= 211.76 cycles
Total Regenerant
per year MT per
stream
211.76 X540/1000
114.35 of NaOH
211.76 X223 /1000
=47.22 MT NH4OH
211.76 X 222.0 /1000
= 47.01 MT of NaOH
Regenerant cost 114.35 X 24000
27.44 lakh.
@ Rs.24000 / MT
7000X 47.22
= 3.30 lakh
@Rs.7000/MT
24000x 47.0
= 11.28 lakh.
@ Rs. 24000/MT
Savings 27.44 - (3.30 + 11.28) 12.86 lakh on regenerant
Effluent
generated percycle m3
97 11.5 X 4.2
= 48.3
11.5 X 3.6
= 41.4
Effluentgenerated per
year m3 per
stream
211.76 X 97=20540.72
211.76 X48.3=10228.00
211.76 X 41.4= 8766.86
Reduction inEffluent.
M3 = 20540.72 (10228.0 + 8766.86)= 1545.86
Rs. Lakh per year = 40 X 1545.86 (@ Rs.40/m3)
= 61834.4 = 0.62 Lakh (Savings)
Net saving of
Regenerant
&Effluent
= 12.86 + 0.62
* = 13.48 lakh
Capital
Expenditure
Rs.4.0 + 24.60 (WBA resin cost) Lakh.
= Rs. 28.60
Pay back period = 28.60 / 13.48= 2.12 years
WBA resin required is 4100 x 2 vessels = 8200 x Rs. 300/- = Rs. 24.60 Lakh.
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
9/12
Capital cost estimated is Rs. 4.0 Lakh.
Total capital expenditure will be Rs 28.60 Lakh.
Proposed Scheme :-
1. It is proposed to conduct modifications in WTP-I system, as presently it is not in use and
is kept as standby. The Details of the system is given in Annexure II.
2. Modification in the existing Anion Exchanger pipelines shall be required.(Ann -1)
3. Ammonia storage tank 6-8 m3, with feed pumps (2 nos.) shall have to be procured
4. We will have to procure WBA resin of 4100.0 Lits / vessel. However, the existing SBA
resin of 3700 Lts / vessel will be used from the existing WTP-I system. The balance
quantity (7800 3700) 4100 Lts / vessel will be used in WTP-II as and when required.
Regeneration of Cation Resin will generate acidic effluent which will neutralize the
Ammoniacal effluent ( 2% Ammonia) generated by WBA, if generated simultaneously. All
effluents can be handled by existing Neutralizing pit in WTP and no additional pumping; pipeline
etc is required for the new system.
With such unique combination of WBA and SBA, a high level of regenerant chemical efficiency
can be achieved.
Capital expenditure (estimated) : in Rs.
i Requirement of pumps for pumping Ammonia solution. 2.0 Lakh
ii. Piping system 2.0 Lakh
iii Ammonia storage Tank shall be taken from salvage.
Total Cost : 4.0 Lakh.
Cost Benefit Analysis is as follows:
Capital Expenditure Rs. 4.00 Lakh
Expenditure on WBA resin Rs. 28.60 Lakh
Resin Qty 8200 Lits @ Rs 300/lits.
Total Expenditure Rs. 28.60 Lakh
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
10/12
*Net yearly saving Rs. 13.48 Lakh
Payback period 2.12 years.
Conclusion :- From the trial data and the payback period of 2.12 years, it appearsthat the said system is cost effective and can be implemented without muchmodifications in the existing system.
Annexure - 1
Sr.No. Water Tests B.M.C. R.O.Permeate B.F.Water
1 pH 6.8 -7.2 5.8 8.8 9.02 Conductivity (. mhos) 75 - 85 77 - 80
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
11/12
10 Sulphate as SO4 ppm 3- 4 2 - 3 ----
11 Silica as SiO2 ppm 10 - 15 0.5 1.5
-
8/3/2019 Study of Economic Viability of Using Ammonium Hydroxide as Part Replacement of Sodium Hydroxide in Regenera
12/12
NH4OH
NaOH
WATER TREATMENT PLANT I
(CAPACITY- 200m3/hr.)
Schematic Block Diagram
P.S.F.4 nos.
A.C.F.2 nos.
Cation
Ex.2 nos.
DEGASSER1 no.
P.W.Tank
M.B.1.1/1.2
2 nos.
D.M.1.11 no.
Anion Ex.2 nos.
P.S.F.- Packed Silica Filter. P.W.Tank Polish Water Tank D.M. Demineralised Tank.
A.C.F. Activated Charcoal Filter. Cation Ex. Cation Exchanger.
Anion Ex. Anion Exchanger. M.B. Mixed Bed.
SBA
NaOH & NH4OH soln
during regeneration
Service outlet
R..W.INLET