Studies in Logic

Logic and Argumentation Volume 77

Argumentation and Inference

Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation

Volume II

Volume 66 Logical Consequences. Theory and Applications: An Introduction. Luis M. Augusto

Volume 67 Many-Valued Logics: A Mathematical and Computational Introduction Luis M. Augusto

Volume 68 Argument Technologies: Theory, Analysis, and Applications Floris Bex, Floriana Grasso, Nancy Green, Fabio Paglieri and Chris Reed, eds

Volume 69 Logic and Conditional Probability. A Synthesis Philip Calabrese

Volume 70 Proceedings of the International Conference. Philosophy, Mathematics, Linguistics: Aspects of Interaction, 2012 (PhML-2012) Oleg Prosorov, ed.

Volume 71 Fathoming Formal Logic: Volume I. Theory and Decision Procedures for Propositional Logic Odysseus Makridis

Volume 72 Fathoming Formal Logic: Volume II. Semantics and Proof Theory for Predicate Logic Odysseus Makridis

Volume 73 Measuring Inconsistency in Information John Grant and Maria Vanina Mrtinez, eds.

Volume 74 Dictionary of Argumentation. An Introduction to Argumentation Studies Christian Plantin. With a Foreword by J. Anthony Blair

Volume 75 Theory of Effective Propositional Paraconsistent Logics Arnon Avron, Ofer Arieli and Anna Zamansky

Volume 76 Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. Volume I Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat, eds.

Volume 77 Argumentation and Inference. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation. Volume II Steve Oswald and Didier Maillat, eds.

Studies in Logic Series Editor Dov Gabbay dov.gabbay@kcl.ac.uk

Argumentation and Inference

Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation

Volume II

Edited by

Steve Oswald and

Didier Maillat

© Individual author and College Publications, 2018 All rights reserved. ISBN 978-1-84890-284-8 College Publications Scientific Director: Dov Gabbay Managing Director: Jane Spurr http://www.collegepublications.co.uk Printed by Lightning Source, Milton Keynes, UK All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without prior permission, in writing, from the publisher.

v Table of contents Regular Papers 1. Inference and Virtue ............................................................................................. 1

Andrew Aberdein

2. Why the Dialectical Tier is an Epistemic Animal .................................... 11 Scott F. Aikin

3. (Digital and) Material Representations of the European Green ....... 23 Belt: Juxtaposing Nature and Technology in Our Collective Memory of the Cold War Marcia Allison & Emma Frances Bloomfield

4. Reasoning Together: Fostering Rationality Through Group ............. 33 Deliberation Mark Battersby & Sharon Bailin

5. Argumentation Profiles vs. Argumentation Schemes ........................... 49 Angelina Bobrova

6. Believing, Inferring, and Basing ..................................................................... 63 Patrick Bondy

7. Be Committed to Your Premises, or Face the Consequences: ........... 79 A Pragmatic Analysis of Commitment Inferences Kira Boulat & Didier Maillat

8. The Role of Argumentative Discussions in the Transmission. .......... 93 of Implicit Norms and Values in Families with Young Children Antonio Bova

9. Virtue Argumentation Theory Reconsidered: Towards ................... 107 a Complete Account of Good Argument Tracy Bowell & Justine Kingsbury

10. A Conflict Index for Arguments in an Argumentation Graph ......... 115 Giulia Cesari, Francesca Fossati & Stefano Moretti

11. Argumentation Traits, Frames, and Dialogue Orientations ............ 133 Ioana A. Cionea, Dale Hample, Stacie Wilson Mumpower, Eryn N. Bostwick, Cameron W. Piercy & Candace L. Foutch

12. From Semi-Abstract Argumentation to Logical Consequence ....... 151 Esther Anna Corsi & Christian G. Fermüller

vi

13. Reconstructing Multimodal Argument: The Dove vs. Nivea ........... 165 Advertisement Hédi Virág Csordás & Gábor Forrai

14. Rhetorical Inferences for Divine Authority: The Case of .................. 179 Classical Greek Divination Julie Dainville

15. Irresolvable Rational Disputes .................................................................... 191 Istvan Danka

16. Processing Linguistic Persuasion: A Study in Message ..................... 205 Discrepancy Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska

17. Questioning the Explicit Cancellability of Scalar Implicatures ...... 221 Laura Devlesschouwer

18. Reasoning via Dialogue: An Illustrative Analysis ................................ 233 of Deliberation Stéphane Dias & Jane Silveira

19. Are Humans Poor at Arguing? From ‘the Argumentative ................ 247 Theory of Reasoning’ back to a Rhetorical Theory of Argumentation Salvatore Di Piazza, Francesca Piazza & Mauro Serra

20. The Critical Question Model of Argument Assessment ..................... 263 Ian J. Dove & E. Michael Nussbaum

21. Topoi and Refutations in Aristotle ............................................................. 281 Iovan Drehe

22. Gender, Argumentation and Inference in Mexican Political ........... 289 and Media Discourse Olga Nelly Estrada & Griselda Zárate

23. “Conductive” Argumentation in the UK Fracking Debate ................ 299 Isabela Fairclough

24. The Development of Prototypical Patterns of Weighing .................. 313 and Balancing in the Justification of Judicial Decisions Eveline T. Feteris

25. “Metaphors are No Arguments, My Pretty Maiden” ........................... 327 The Pragma-Dialectical Reconstruction of Figurative Analogy Bart Garssen

vii

26. Against the Intentional Definition of Argument ................................... 339

G. C. Goddu

27. Visual emotional argumentation: Analytical models ......................... 349 Julieta Haidar

28. The Concept of an Argument ....................................................................... 363 David Hitchcock

29. Metaphors as Arguments: Perspectives from ....................................... 377 Psycholinguistics Curtis Hyra, Hamad Al-Azary, Lori Buchanan & Catherine Hundleby

30. Justifying a Bill Before Parliament: Beyond Instrumental ............... 397 Rationality Constanza Ihnen Jory

31. Ethos and Inference: Insights from a Multimodal Perspective ...... 413 Jérôme Jacquin

32. Ad Populum Arguments in a Political Context ....................................... 425 Henrike Jansen

33. View on Inference from Argumentation Tiers Perspective ............. 439 Iryna Khomenko

34. Studying the Process of Interpretation on a School Task: ............... 453 Crossing Perspectives Alaric Kohler & Teuta Mehmeti

35. Modes of Inference in Aristotle’s Concept of the Enthymeme ....... 479 Manfred Kraus

36. “I Think Any Reasonable Person Will Agree…”: A Corpus ............... 493 and Text Study of Keywords in Irish Political Argumentation Davide Mazzi

37. Arguing Inter-Issue in Public Political Arguments ............................. 511 Dima Mohammed

38. Inference and Argument: Normative and Descriptive ...................... 527 Dimensions Andrei Moldovan

39. Inferring Argumentative Patterns in Polylogues about .................... 541 Energy Issues Elena Musi & Mark Aakhus

viii

40. Apologia in a Networked Society: The Case of Volkswagen’s ........ 561 Polylogical Challenge Cassandra Oliveras-Moreno, Mark Aakhus & Marcin Lewiński

41. The Strategic Use of Examples in Supporting a Positive .................. 581 Evaluation of a Political Group Ahmed Omar

42. It Ought To Be Therefore It Is: On Fallaciousness of So-Called ..... 597 Moralistic Fallacy Tomáš Ondráček & Iva Svačinová

43. Pragmatic Inference and Argumentative Inference ........................... 615 Steve Oswald

44. Challenging Judicial Impartiality: When Accusations of ................... 631 Derailments of Strategic Manoeuvring Derail H. José Plug

45. The “Neoliberal Agenda”: How Portuguese Parties Use ................... 647 The “Neoliberalism” Concept to Argue Against Austerity Vera Ramalhete & Marco Lisi

46. Effect of Explicitness of Teachers’ Arguments on Quality of .......... 665 Adolescent Students’ Inferences in Science and History Chrysi Rapanta

47. On the Epistemic Basing Relation .............................................................. 683 Juho Ritola

48. Dialogical Argumentation in Financial Conference Calls: ................ 699 the Request of Confirmation of Inference (ROCOI) Andrea Rocci & Carlo Raimondo

49. How to Create Rhetorical Exercises? ........................................................ 717 Benoît Sans

50. Filling in the Gaps: The Role of Audience Inference in ...................... 731 Exigence and Ethos Blake Scott

51. Multimodal Argumentation in Factual Television .............................. 741 Andrea Sabine Sedlaczek

52. Bakhtin at the White House: The Argumentative Dimension ........ 755 of the Direct Address in the TV Series House of Cards Carmen Spanò, Antonio Bova, Carlo Galimberti, Daniela Tacchi & Ilaria Vergine

ix

53. Arguments from Other Cases ....................................................................... 769 Katharina Stevens

54. The Attraction of the Ideal Has No Traction on the Real: ................ 787 On Adversariality and Roles in Argument Katharina Stevens & Daniel H. Cohen

55. Cultural Disagreements and Legal Argumentation: ........................... 805 An Educational Program in Middle Schools Serena Tomasi

56. The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Multimodal .................................. 821 Argumentation: Comparing the Argumentative Use of Nano-Images in Scientific Journals and Science Magazines Assimakis Tseronis

57. Social Costs of Epistemic Vigilance and Premises ............................... 843 in Arguments Christoph Unger

58. Sets of Situations, Topics, and Question Relevance ............................ 857 Mariusz Urbański & Natalia Żyluk

59. Strategic Maneuvering with Presentational Devices: ........................ 873 A Systematic Approach Ton Van Haaften & Maarten Van Leeuwen

60. Criticism and Justification of Negotiated Compromises ................... 887 Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe

61. Argumentative Functions of Metaphors: How can Metaphors ...... 909 Trigger Resistance? Lotte van Poppel

62. Argument Structures and Frame Theory as Tools of ......................... 925 Linguistic Discourse Analysis Simon Varga

63. Straw Man as Misuse of Rephrase ............................................................. 941 Jacky Visser, Marcin Koszowy, Barbara Konat, Kasia Budzynska & Chris Reed

64. Inferences Across Normative Domains ................................................... 963 Sheldon Wein

65. Conspiracy Ideations in Healthcare: A Rhetorical and ...................... 973 Argumentative Analysis Roberta Martina Zagarella & Marco Annoni

x

66. With the Best Intentions, and the Worst Arguments. ........................ 989 The “Fertility Day” Campaign in Italy Marta Zampa & Chiara Pollaroli

67. Of Inference and Argumentation in Financial Discourse: ............. 1015 The Crisis of 2007-2008 Griselda Zárate & Homero Zambrano

68. What Warrants the Warrant? ................................................................... 1027 David Zarefsky