student reassignment - november 21, 2011

26
REASSIGNMENT

Upload: nash-rocky-mount-public-schools

Post on 28-May-2015

4.223 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

REASSIGNMENT

Page 2: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Do We Need to Look At Reassignment for the Entire

District???

Page 3: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

ENROLLMENT ANALYSIS

Page 4: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ENROLLMENT CAPACITY % OF CAPACITY MOBILE UNITS/ TEACHING

STATIONS

Bailey Elem. 641 664 96% 1 / 2

Baskerville Elem. 363 427 85% n/a

Benvenue Elem. 760 668 113% 6 / 11

Cedar Grove Elem. 204 146 139% 2 / 4

Coopers Elem. 659 601 109% 3 / 5

Johnson Elem. 472 575 82% n/a

Englewood Elem. 509 508 100% 4 / 6

Hubbard Elem. 482 512 94% 5 / 5

Middlesex Elem. 362 418 86% n/a

Nashville Elem. 738 682 108% 4 / 7

Pope Elem. 284 311 91% 5 / 7

Red Oak Elem. 302 335 90% 2 / 3

Spring Hope Elem. 547 542 100% 4 / 6

Swift Creek Elem. 317 475 66% n/ a

Williford Elem. 424 581 72% 1 / 2

Winstead Avenue Elem. 536 625 85% n/a

Elementary School Totals 7600 8070 94% 37 / 58

Page 5: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

ELEMENTARY CAPACITY

Current stated Elementary capacity 8070 students

Current Elementary enrollment of 7600 students

10 Elementary Schools are at or over 90% capacity

7 of those 10 are at or above 100% capacity

We currently have 37 mobile units serving at 11 of our 16 schools

These mobile units account for 58 teaching stations/ classrooms

These mobile units at capacity serve 1450 students.

Page 6: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Spring Hope

Middlesex Bailey

Coopers

Cedar Grove

Nashville

Red Oak/ Swift Creek

Hubbard

Englewood/ Winstead

Benvenue Baskerville

Williford

JohnsonPope

Page 7: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

MIDDLE

SCHOOL

CURRENT

ENROLLMENT CAPACITY

% OF

CAPACITY

MOBILE UNITS/

TEACHING STATIONS

Nash Central

Middle 607 670 90% 2 / 3

Edwards Middle 740 827 90% 3 / 6

Parker Middle 426 509 83% n/a

Red Oak Middle 926 850 108% 4 / 8

Southern Nash

Middle 1092 850 128% 6 / 11

W. L. Green Alt.

Schl. 47 32 146% n/a

Middle School

Totals 3838 3738 102% 15 / 28

Page 8: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY

Current stated Middle School capacity 3,738 students

Current Middle School enrollment of 3,838 students

4 Middle Schools are at or over 90% capacity

2 of the 4 are well above 100% capacity

We currently have 15 mobile units serving at 4 of our 5 Middle Schools

These mobile units account for 28 teaching stations/ classrooms

Page 9: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Southern Nash Middle School

Red Oak Middle School

Parker

Page 10: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

HIGH

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT CAPACITY % CAPACITY MUs / CLASSROOMS

Nash Central

High 1244 1150 92% 4 / 5

Early College

High 231 200 115% n/a

Northern Nash

High 1221 1150 106% 4 / 4

Rocky Mount

High 1162 1390 83% 1 / 2

Southern Nash

High 1267 1068 118% 7 / 13

W. L. Greene

Alt. Schl. 54 130 41% n/a

High School

Totals 5179 5088 101% 16 / 24

Page 11: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY

Current stated High School capacity 5088 students

Current High School enrollment of 5179 students

4 High Schools are at or over 90% capacity

2 of the 4 are above 100% capacity

The Early College is currently above 100% capacity

We currently have 16 mobile units serving at 3 of our 4 comprehensive high schools, and the Early College High School

These mobile units account for 16 teaching stations/ classrooms (NOT INCLUDING THE EARLY COLLEGE)

Page 12: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Southern Nash High School

Page 13: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

REASSIGNMENT PROCESS

Appoint a division reassignment committee

Build consensus on board priority for outcome of redistricting

Engage ORED to begin the demographic work

Approve reassignment schedule with anticipated implementation August 2013

Page 14: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

SUGESTED MAKE-UP DIVISION STUDENT REASSIGNMENT

COMMITTEE

5 Principals

4 Parents

11 BOE picks – 1 Per District

1 - Accountability

1 - Transportation

1 - Auxiliary Services

1 - Nash County

1 - Rocky Mount City

1 - Edgecombe County

Page 15: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Build consensus on board priority for outcome of redistricting

Page 16: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

DRAFT REASSIGNMENT

PRIORITIES

Page 17: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Proposed Reassignment Guidelines

Contiguous boundaries: Attempt to maintain contiguous school boundaries without using

satellite attendance areas.

Respect neighborhoods: Avoid dividing easily recognized “neighborhoods” or identified

“developments” or “sub- divisions” unless it is necessary to meet other guidelines. Whenever possible and practical use major highways, railroads, rivers, and streams as natural boundaries.

Proximity to schools: While it is recognized that all students cannot be assigned to their

closest school, consider students proximity to other schools when creating school boundaries.

Page 18: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Proposed Reassignment Guidelines

Modify feeder systems: In order to maximize facility use and establish reasonable numbers of students at each

site, consider the use of 6 middle school feeder systems instead of 5. This would allow smaller, more instructionally suited middle schools and less dependence on mobile classrooms.

Stay within enrollment capacities: Unless it is likely that a school enrollment will be declining, assign students to the four

high schools in a way that their enrollments are under established capacities.

Consider anticipated growth: Enrollment growth patterns should be taken into consideration, where feasible, to

ensure that anticipated growth will not adversely impact one school significantly more than the others.

Enrollment balance: In keeping with the intent of SB612, attempt to balance the percentage of academic and

economic populations at each middle and high school.

Page 19: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Ensure Compliance with Targets Outlined in Senate Bill 612

Sec. 17. (a) The Interim Board and the Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education shall make their best efforts to achieve a racial balance in student enrollment, within plus or minus 12 percentage points of the system wide average minority student enrollment at the following schools: Rocky Mount Senior High, Northern Nash Senior High and any new high school within the Nash-Rocky Mount School Administrative Unit, and any middle or junior high school that feeds any of these high schools. A school will be considered to be in substantial compliance with the racial balance objectives of this paragraph if its racial balance is plus or minus 18 percentage points of the system wide average minority student enrollment. (b) For all schools other than those covered in subsection (a) of this section, the Nash-Rocky Mount Board of Education will promote reasonable and practical racial balance in the schools, utilizing and preserving neighborhood and voluntary schools to the maximum extent permitted by the Constitution, and consistent with sound educational practices.

Page 20: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Engage ORED to Provide Technical Assistance to the

Committee

Page 21: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

WHY – ORED???

Operations Research and Education Laboratory (OREd) is uniquely equipped to provide the necessary technical support and expertise to the Board of Education ‘s Student Reassignment Committee as they prepare recommendations for long-range planning solutions that are based on data and driven by school policy

Page 22: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

Develop a Student Reassignment time-line to include public input

Board of Education approval with anticipated implementation

2013-14 school year

Page 23: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

PROPOSED TIME-LINE *

December 2011

Collect latest GIS layers from Nash County/Rocky Mount GIS

Collect Month-1 ADM data and electronic student data for SY 2011-12

Review school building capacity data including recent renovations, closings and openings

Review Planning Segment geometry and revise as necessary

January/ February 2012

Present 2011-12 Out-of-Capacity table with ten-year enrollment forecast

Meet with Reassignment Committee – The IPSAC process and NRMPS

* Flexible based on BOE action

Page 24: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

PROPOSED TIME-LINE *

March 2012 Present 2010-11 Out-of-

Capacity table

Meet with Reassignment Committee – Preliminary scenarios

March – June 2012 Review/ Revise scenarios

Meet with Reassignment Committee – Revised scenarios

Community engagement meetings

Meet with Reassignment Committee – Final scenarios

Present final scenarios to Board.

* Flexible based on BOE action

Page 25: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

ADMINISTRATIVE RECOMMENDATIONS

① Open the new Rocky Mount High School facility with just the current students.

② Convert the former Rocky Mount High School facility into a new middle school to open in Fall 2013.

③ Establish a Division-wide Student Reassignment Committee to bring recommendations to the board for realignment of students to maximize facility use by December 2012 for implementation at the start of the 2013 year.

④ Engage the services of ORED (Operations Research and Education Laboratory) to provide technical expertise to the committee.

Page 26: Student Reassignment - November 21, 2011

QUESTIONS???