structure no. 06656 - ct.gov-connecticut's …. p.l. all vehicles posted vert clearance on...
TRANSCRIPT
STRUCTURE NO. 06656
ROUTE 202over
BROOK
LITCHFIELD
Routine Inspection
on8/24/2006
Inspected by Team 5
forArea 7
/ of/I
TEAM: Forwarded to Senior Ketth DeBishop Date
SENIOR:
PERVI
Reviewed by Senior
BMM Required
Town Bndge
Rating <= 5 (Items 58,59,60 or 62)
Forwarded to Supervisor
Forwarded to "To Be COPied Drawer"
Date BRi·19 Entered
/?KO Date 9·02c-oC-
#}fJ#cJi~5
Date 1-~ (r 0(,Date
SUPPORT: Date Copies Made
NSf: No
BMMNo
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BUREAU OF HIGHWAYS
Structure No. I 06656~==========Inspection Date 1_=-8/~2~4~/2~0~0~6~
~ of//
INSPECTION REPORT TRANSMITTAL FORM
Form BRI-27, Rev. 6/00
Town I LITCHFIELD=====:::::=::::=======Inspectors 1__--'T~e=.:a~m=-5~__
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Loose Forms (not bound in report)
Maintenance Memo
Flagging Memos
PONTIS Element Data Collection Form
Plan Sheets Already on file 0
Bound Report Pages
Title Cover Sheet
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Field Notes
Calculations: Load Rating Evaluation
Quantities & Cost Estimate
Photo Sheets
Photo Images
Forms
BRI-18, Bridge Inspection Form
BRI-19, Highway Bridge Inventory Form
Comments:[HI Attache_d_s_h_ee_t_s_, _
Number of SheetsEnclosed
91) Frequency Class:Inspection Team
Access Ragman r ...
ITJ- ITJ <CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTIONS ~
Type Frequency Team Date ~
~. E§ E§ L~ ~Fracture:
Uwater:
Special:
90) Inspection Date
~~Indepth Insp Deck Survey
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE SAFETY & EVALUATION
STRUCTURE EVALUATIONSHEET 1 OF 2 FORM BRI·19 REV 10100
SHEET3 OF-LL (INSP. REPORT)
% JA.,.,
Data Entry By:
Data Entry Date:oo
<.",,:::"""" ~ v~{r"''''''', &>
BS&E Received
Copies Made
Inspected By:
Bridge Number
IDENTIFICATION
Bridge Name 27) Year Built
TownName Lik~<.\J Town Code n 1~1':;B317IDI 42) Type of Service:5) Inventory Route: A) On
A) Record Type i ~ D) Rou1e Number ~ 28) Number of Lanes:B) Signing Prefix'· E) Directional Suffix ---- - . 0 A) On
C) Level 01 Service .; 29) Average Daily Traffic
6) Feature Intersected 109) Percent Truck
30) Year of ADTu...lL.J.::.............,'-LL..3..---I.---'---JL..-.L-.............L--'--L---I.---'---JL..-.L-.............L--'--L---I.---''--~7) Facility Carried: 19) Bypass, Detour Length
AGE AND SERVICE
~ 106) Year Reconstructed
C€~7'::>rn B) Under
~ _ B) Un<ier_~HalIADT?:
%
miles
~
~
~~
B) Right
It
It
It
sqlt
deg
It in
It
It
It in
Ref It in
Ref It;,It
GEOMETRIC DATA
It
It
___________ BRIDGE COMMENTS _
48) Length of Max Span
49) Structure Length
50) Curb or Sidewalk Widths:
A) Left It [QIQ].~51) Brg Rdwy widlh,curb-curb
52) Deck Width, 0U1-0ut
32) Approach Roadway Width
33) Bridge Median
Deck Area
34) Skew Angle
35) Structure Flared
10 )Inv. Rte. Min. Vert Clearance
47) Log Inv. Rte. Total Horiz Clr.:
47) RLog Inv. Rte. Total Horiz. CIr.:
53) Min Vert Clearance Over Bridge
54) Min Vert Under Clearance
55) Min Lat Under Clearance on Right
56) Min Lat Under Clearance on Lelt
[lllI
L....L.....Jsec
%ITJ
~~
sec ITI]deg
sec ITI]deg
ITI] B) Percent Responsibility
min
min
STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL
43) Structure Type. Main:
A) Material - ~ B) Design Type
44) Structure Type, Approach:
A) Material _' 0 B) Design Type
45) Number 01 Spans, Main Un~
46) Number of Approach Spans
107) Deck Structure Type
108) Wearing Surfac&'Protective System:
A) Type of Wearing Surface
B) Type of Membrane
C) Type of Deck Protection
99) Border Bridge Structure No
~
(p
60<
NBIS Length
~
I 1 1 I-J
Date
---- APPRAISALS
Bridge Number
Town Name
67) Structure Evaluation
E 68) Deck Geometry
69) Under Clear Ver1 & Horiz
71) Waterway Adequ<K:y
• ~ '72) Approach Rdwy Alignment
113) SCour Critical
I
INSPECTION COMMENTS --------
(INSP. REPORTlI Facility Carried
Feature Crossed
-----------_&_-----------LOAD RATING AND POSTING
~Evaluation Code
Year 01 Evaluation
o=J 70) Bridge Posting
o=J 41) Structure Status
CONDITION ----
OF
Items 58 Thru 72 Checked By:
36) Traffic Salety Features:
A) Bridge Railings
B) Transitions
C) Approach Guardrail
D) Approach Guardrail End
STRUCTURE EVALUATIONSHEET 2 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10100
58) Deck
59) Superstructure
60) Substructure
61) Channel & Chan. Protection
62) Culver1s
REVIEWED BY: {.- \ L/-~ /~ - r •>
31) Design Load
63) Operating Rating Type
64) Operati.ng Rating
65) Inventory Rating Type
66) Inventory Rating
Inspected By:
SHEET
n Proposed Next Indepth Insp Year
n Senior
mph Supervisor
~
I
I
I
I--
L-
~
tons
tons
tons
tons
tons
EE:
-----------OTHER FEATURES
-_.::.._-======-- Fence Required fT.: ~ Barrel Ladder
Fence Present ' Stand Pipes
Fence Height ',' It 0 0 . 0 It Cat WalksFence Type • Movable Inspection System
Fence Material __ ·1 Loose Concrete Checked?
Fence Top Type
I
It
ADT I I
WATERWAY
CLASSIFICATION
tons I Actual P.L 4Me Trucktons Rec. P.L. 4Me Truck
tons Actual P.L 382 Truck
tons Rec. P.L. 382 Truck
tons Actual PL All Vehicles
It' inIt in...mph
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Other Posted Signs 1
Other Posted Signs 2
Actual P.L. Single Unit Truck
Rec. P.L. Single Unit Truck
Actual P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck
Rec. P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck
Rec. P.L. All Vehicles
Posted Vert Clearance On Bridge
Posted Ver1 UnderClearance
Posted Speed Umit
VtilityL:lility
75A) Type of Work Proposed
75B) Work Done By
76) Length of Struct. Improvement P! ~ It
94) Bridge Improvement Cost $
95) Roadway Improvement Cost $
96) Totai Project Cost $
97) Year of Improvement Cost Est.
114) Fu1ureADT ~115)YearFu1Ure
Ust No. Project No. I _ .' Adver1ised
POSTED SIGNS & UTILITIES
DrainageBasinCode
38) Navigation Control
39) Navigation Ver1 Clr. lQIQIQI 40) Navigation Horiz Clr.
116) Ver1-UIt Brg Nav Min
111) Pier Abutment Protection
112) NBIS Bridge Length
104) Highway System
26) FunctionaJ Class .
1(0) Delense Highway
101) Parallel Structure
102) Direction of Traffic
103) Temporary Structure
110) Designated National Network
20) Toll
21) Maintain
22) Owner
Repor1 Class
37) Historical Significance
SO,FI/
BRIDGE #: I 06656
Connecticut Department of Transportation
Bridge Inspection Report BRI-18
INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006
FEATURE CARRIED: I~R=-O=-U=-T~E=20=2=====-- __FEATURE INTERSECTED IBROOK
MAIN DESIGN: ICulvert (includes frame cuiv I
INSPECTION TYPE: IRoutine I PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATE:
INSPECTION PERFORMED BY: I~T=ea=m=5:====~1
TOWN: ILITCHFIELD====::==;::::::::::::::::;:::::::::==
LOCATION: 11 MI S OF TORR. TL
MAIN MATERIAL: IL..:S_tee_1 _
SNOOPER REQUIRED: ~
SNOOPER USED: ~
YEAR BUILT: 11950 I
YEAR REBUILT: D
INSPECTION VISITS:
Inspection Date: 1812, 1Temperature: 79 0 F
Start Time:~~~
End Time:'---_......
INSPECTORS:
Inspector: 1"="0-::.T:-a"""mo-n-::t-
Inspector: IK Weir
Task: 1Inventory Structure
Task: IInventory Structure
58. DECK I OVERAllL RATING mMI!!jQ
OVERLAY mI":O""v-e-:"rla-y-s-:"h-o-ws-s-o-m-e-t-ra-n-sv-e-rs-e-&-:-:-lo-n-g"""itu-d-::"in-a-:"l-c-ra-c""ks-o-p-e-n-u-p-t"-0-1'"'I2:-:-in-c""h-.A:-I-so-,-:"(""1)-::f"-ul:-'WI....,..,·dt"'"h-----,
transverse crack open up to 2 inches +/-.See photo 2.
DECK STR. CONDITION [E]CURBS [E]
MEDIAN [E]SIDEWALKS [E]
PARAPET [E]RAILING [E]
PAINT [E]FENCE [E]
DRAINS [E]LIGHTING STANDARD [E]UTILITIES TYPE/SIZE [E]
CONSTRUCTION JOINTS [E]EXPANSION JOINTS [E]
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE OVERALL RATING [[I
60. SUBSTRUCTURE OVERALL RATING [[]
61. CHANNEL PROTECTION OVERALL RATING mRATIIjG
CHANNEL SCOUR II] l":"L-o-ca-::l-s-co-u-r-u-p...,.t-o""::2-::.S:-f=-ee-t,.-e-x-p-os...,.i-ng.....,...b-ac-:"k-s""id"-e"""fr-e-e-e-n"'"d-o""ft""h-e-s-ou-th""-w-es-t-Wl-::'-ngw-a-:"II=-,-ca-u-s-e"'"d""fr-om-----'
alignment of channel.Also, local scour at outlet end from 15 inch diameter (accmp) in the southeast wingwall.
EMBANKMENT EROSION~ Embankment erosion along the southwest wingwaU.See above item.
DEBRIS~ IEncroachment limits channel flow.
VEGETATION ~ IHeavy vegetation growth.See photos 15 & 16.
Printed on 813112006 2:14:16 PM Page 1 of 3
BRIDGE #: I 06656 I
61. CHANNEL PROTECTION
Connecticut Department of Transportation
Bridge Inspection Report BRI-i8
INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006 IOVERALL RATING m
CHANNEL CHANGE~ Channel enters culvert at a 90 degree angle and the encroachment directs the flow along thefree end of southwest wingwall and limits channel flow.
FENDER SYSTEM I[] 1
=====================~SPUR DIKES & JETIIES I[] I======================
RIP RAP I[] 1 _
62. CULVERTS & RETAINING WALL 1 I OVERALL RATING m~ ----------------------------------,
BARRELl[] 1======================CONCRETE I[] 1
~====:::===================~STEEL~ (ACCMP)
7 Plates. 6 inch by 1-3/4 by 3/16 inch corrugations.Areas of protective coat peeling,isolated areas of staining & small chips in paint.Invert shows moderate pitting with moderate to heavy rust.First 11 feet +/- at inlet shows perforation holes up to 9 inches long by 2 inches wide alongnorth side.Mid point of culvert shows random perforation holes up to 1/2 inch +/- in diameter along southside.Last 8 feet at outlet shows isolated perforation holes up to 6 inches long up to 2-3/8 inches widealong north side.See photos 5 thru 8.
TIMBER I[] 1
~::;::;=:;:=::::;::=:======;::;::::;::::::===:=~:::::::=;===:==::==~:==::::::;:=;=:====~HEADWAll [] East Headwall shows areas of light scale and hairline cracks at north with some light
efflorescence.
CUTOFF WAll I[] INot Visible.
~====:=::=::=.==~=:=====;:~==:====:====::::::==:::==:=:::==;==~DEBRIS~ Moderate accumulation of silt & brush up to 1.5 feet +/- at inlet end extending for 6 feet +/- into
pipe.See photos 3, 9 &10.
RETAINING WAll STEM [[] Southeast wingwall with a 15 inch diameter (accmp) shows light scale & vegetation growth ontop.Northeast wingwall shows hairline cracks with light to moderate efflorescence.Southwest wingwall shows (1) isolated vertical hairline crack.Northwest wingwall covered with heavy vegetation growth.See photos 11 thru 14.
FOOTING I[] INot Visible.
APPROACH CONDITION '-- ----', OVERAll RATING [[)
MIlliQ
APPROACH SLAB I[]1.------------------------------
RELIEF JOINTS I[] 1
APPROACH GUIDE RAil [] ~(M:=:=;:B:;::R::=)=:at=w=es=::=t.==========================~Weak sts at east, some d north.
APPROACH PAVEMENT [[] Bituminous concrete shows transverse & longitudinal cracks open up to 1/2 inch +/-.See hoto 1.
APPROACH EMBANKMENT [] Paved runoff at the southeast and some roadway runoff erosion.
TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES:
BRIDGE RAILINGS I[] I'------------------------------
Printed on 8/3112006 2:14:16 PM Page 2 of 3
BRIDGE #: I 06656 I
7oF//Connecticut Department of Transportation
Bridge Inspection Report BRI-18
INSPECTION DATE: 1812412006 IAPPROACH CONDITION I OVERALL RATING m
TRANSITlONS [[] I I1iUl1~==============1APPROACH GUARDRAILS ~ .
APPR. GUARDRAIL ENDS [[] I ILOAD POSTING
SINGLE UNIT (TONS) D I~==================
HS(TONS) D I~======================:::::::;4 AXLE (TONS) D
~=====================3S2(TONS) D~=====================ADVANCE WARNING YIN D~====================~LEGIBILITY D:====================VISIBILITY/LOCATION D'------------------------------
MISC.
MIN VERT. UNDERCLR. ~.~ ..I~========================:=;POSTEDCLR.UNDERBRIDGEO'O"';::========================:::::::;
POSTEDCLR.ON BRlDGE O'O"~I=======================~ADVANCEWARNING(YIN) I Noll========================
SPEED LIMIT (IF ANY) DMPH '===========================CHARACTER OF TRAFFIC 1 _
ADDITIONAL NOTES
IFirst Inspection.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Culvert done South to North.West is inlet end.
Inspectors' Signatures: 1)
2)
Date:
Date:
~~dootP
cf.,3/;~
P.E. Signature:
P.E.#:
Reviewed by:
3)
4)
Date: __ , __ ,__
Date: __ , __ ,__
Date: __ ' __ '__
Printed on 8/3112006 2:14:16 PM Page 3 of 3
8oF//
Bridge No._06656 Condition rating: _4__ ProgramList:
Steel Culvert Assessment Program - Fall 2003
Date Inspected: _08-24-06 Inspection Interval:
Inspectors: Team 5
Location: _I Mi. South of Torrington & Litchfiels Town Line_
Year Built: (EST) 1950 Design dimension: 9 FT BY 6 FT
Amount of cover: 3 FT +/-.
Is the crown deformed? Yes No X jf yes, comment below-- - --
Has the shape changed? Yes__ No x if yes, comment below(Measurements at both ends and at 25-foot intervals, conditions may warrant more)
Is the bottom deteriorated? Yes x No if yes, comment below-- --Perforation boles up to at inlet,center & outlet up to 9 incbes long up to 2 incheswide.
Cracks at springline? Yes No x if yes, comment below-- --
Any abnormalities in the roadway surface? Yes No x if yes,-- --comment below
Additional comments (i.e. corrosion, bolt condition) _Areas of protective coat peeling.Invert - moderate pitting with moderate to heavyrust
9oF//
8 ft from outlet end Marked with orange p~
9' 2-1/4"6'02"
33 ft - center9' 03-1/2 "6' 1/2"
Litchfield Br# 06656 US Route 202 0/ Brook8/24/2006
8 ft from inlet9' 03"6'00"
SpanRise
ORGANIZATION UNIT NO. WORK ORDER NO.
State of ConnecticutDepartment of Transportation
Bureau of Engineering & Highway OperationsDES-003 REV 1-93
(302·06·0225)COMPUTATION SHEET / tJ 7 SHEET NO.
/0
\l1\ ~ tiT- r ,. ......
< \(,1"
\'\1- ttr1l1
~ -<.EII>I \ \1 . .
Printed on Recycled or Recovered Paper
ORGANIZATION UNIT NO. WORK ORDER NODATE PREPARED
R -, - '1 'YJ<cDATE CHECKED
PREPARED BY
- EPm <"CHECKED BY
State at ConnecticutDepartment of Transportation
Bureau of Engineering & Highway OperationsDES-003 REV 1-93
(302-06-0225)COMPUTATION SHEET /..307 SHEET NO// nF//
00o/~
!lGG YY' Po
U/(N_- /oF/"-d./ SkEW
7 Ii's -h IX /1/:;- 3//t, II7?lIC/('
o
!lS r 8 ~/ flo,(I9;rFb />~,..p, HbJE
{/'" TO to" .(0A/(;7 c"" 7""0 ;:;,-}!g" To' E".
AI':. ,t'7/i £;rtJ £
/,F;-w- "'/-1 $N/F ;: Ala r
1/" At/01 y" /'/1',/)£ ..o/.r~ ~'b.n'.T
S ()C; '" srt:::.6 .
/'7'/./oN'I;y"?'lJtJ ,4c~. o/" STJ r t7,f}pu 1-/
To ./, S "?"r,h'.;zl'l
;p.>;r //"r--/) .;OEIi'F hlp/r~ ~r' TO
9,' .., II r-,/e>IJ"&)(' C/- IN.rlic )NDRrN .s:rVE
/lI!EIJS o/"~RorEcr%V£,tO~~1rN~
fNVe.t'/-/lJoiJ.//z.?/fA ~ wI{nO./.;.
70 Alvy Rv,s,-r: SEc /-",,-Rt::"}/o1F.. ~& 15,
I Ifa;:
" k- V.PI' "/"..r,
.~-. -.~
---
c.l ,--- ~.
-
Jv iJ!_ .....t1 (..1""
I I~/
SUBJECT:
:'.r7CijFfE1.
..J.OC~ SO'" T"o;l.S,c.rj E/)(f~tV{?
AA r G F
h'EEF/-/i:' oFWrM'wA1L...
Printed on Recycled or Recovered Paper
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23,2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 1Looking South from the North approach. {Bucket truckparked at structure.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 2Wearing surface.
Page 1
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KJRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23,2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 3Inlet. {West}
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 4Outlet. {East}
Page 2
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 5Looking in from the inlet.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 6Holes in the invert near the inlet.
Page 3
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 7Looking in from the outlet.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 8Holes in the invert near the outlet.
Page 4
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 9Debris built-up at the inlet.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 10Looking at the debris built-up at the inlet from inside thepipe.
Page 5
Brid2e No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 11The Southwest wingwall.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT.. doc
Photo # 12The Northwest wingwall.
Page 6
Brid~e No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 13The Southeast wingwall.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT..doc
Photo # 14The Northeast wingwall.
Page 7
Bridge No. 06656 Inspected by: DENNIS TALMONTTown: Litchfield Inspected by: KIRK WEIRFeature Carried: US Route 202 Date Inspected: August 23, 2006Feature Crossed: Brook
Photo # 15Looking upstream from the inlet.
Printed on August 24, 200606656RPT. .doc
Photo # 16Looking downstream from the outlet.
Page 8
STRUCTURE NO. 06656
ROUTE 202over
BROOK
LITCHFIELD
Special Inspection
on9/19/2007
Inspected by Team 6
for Area 5
TEAM: Forwarded to Senior Keith DeBishop Date 9/2812007
Rating = 5 (Items 58.59,60 or 62)
SENIOR:
BMM ReqUIred
Town Bndge
Forwarded to Superv sor
Forwarded to "To Be Copied Drawer"
Date BRI 19 Entered
(?J<D I' /0/2- /07;Va~t/
'fC"J
w'- D I /r: Ir/l 7~ Date
SUPPORT: Date Copies Made
NBI: No
BMMNo
90) Inspection Date Inspection Team 91) Frequency Class
CCIILIJ 7~ 24 01
Indepth Insp Deck Survey Access Flagman0oCO o[I]
--- <CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTIONS ~
Type Frequency Team Date ~
012W 5W4124/2007 I
10
~0(INSP. REPORT)
EVALUATIONSHEET 1 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10/00
SHEET-'--- OF
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
BRIDGE SAFETY & EVALUATION
?
CJ(. l fiL.!J'rl¥ &CA- H 4Qh !! !
STRUCTURE
BS&E Received 0 Data Entry By:
Copies Made 0 Data Entry Date:
Sufficiency Rating 68
Previous Inspection Date 8/24/2006
Inspected By:
Bridge Number
n
lft
n
n
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
ft
sc
~
0000 ITIIJ
o
rrfttE~
0.0 ft.~r
r. ....
r T
I I I I I ,I
I ftl i
I. _f1. f
I ftl i
Ref I ftl 1Ref 1._1
I. '-- '
5 WATERWAY
Oin B
B) Right
99 in
99 in
Oft
0.0 ft
0.0 ft
B) Under
CO B) Under 0
CCIILIJ Half ADT?:
6"10
2005
omiles
GEOMETRIC DATA
10 ft
10 ft
8800
48) Length of Max Span
49) Structure length
50) Curb or Sidewalk Widths.
A) left 0.0 ft [=r=J. D51) Brg Rdwy width,curb-curb 42.0 ft
52) Deck Width, Out-Out 0.0 ft
32) Approach Roadway Width 42 ft
33) Bridge Median 0 No Median
Deck Area 660 sqft
34) Skew Angle 21 deg
35) Structure Flared 0
10 )Inv. Rte. Min. Vert Clearance 99 ft
47) Log Inv. Rte. Total Horiz Clr.: 42.0 ft
47) Rlog Inv. Rte. Total Horiz. Clr.: ft
53) Min Vert Clearance Over Bridge 99 ft
54) Min Vert Under Clearance Ref
55) Min Lat Under Clearance on Right Ref
56) Min Lat Under Clearance on left
___________ BRIDGE COMMENTS _
sec
sec
"loCO
~§
~
43370 ITIIIJ
Other
I I .1r 1 1min I. l
I 1 1min I. i
D) Route Number 00202
E) Directional Suffix 0
Town Code
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
§
o B) Design Type 19 Culvert (includes fra CO
o B) Design Type 0
ITI] B) Percent Responsibility
IDENTIFICATION
STRUCTURE TYPE AND MATERIAL
State Highway
Mainline
BROOK
40.59 Miles
41 deg 46 min 23.98 sec ITI]deg
73deg 10 min 15.45 sec ITI]deg
43) Structure Type, Main:
A) Material 3 Steel
44) Structure Type, Approach:
A) Material 0 Other
45) Number of Spans, Main Uni1 1
46) Number of Approach Spans 0
107) Deck Structure Type
108) Wearing Surface/Protective System:
A) Type of Wearing Surface INB) Type of Membrane I!'lC) Type of Deck Protection N
99) Border Bridge Structure No
Bridge Name
Town Name LITCHFIELD
5) Inventory Route:
A) Record Type 1
B) Signing Prefix 3
C) level of Service 1
6) Feature Intersected
---__-----;::::;;:::;:-y-~A~GEAND SERVICE27) Year Built 1950 0 , , I 106) Year Reconstructed
42) Type of Service:
A) On 1 Highway D28) Number of Lanes:
A) On 2
29) Average Daily Traffic
__ 109) Percent Truck
''''-''-T'--""'-"-T'-''''-''-Y'-r'-"r-T'-T'--"...-"-T'--""'-"-T'-''''-''-Y'-r'-,'r-T'---" 30) Year of ADT
19) Bypass, Detour length7) Facility Carried ROUTE 202'-1-o,--r,...:;.r-I~,"':':':',--r'---Y-I -',r--ol---r,---r"1-',r--T,----'l , , , 1
9) Location 1 MI S OF TORR. Tl1 , , , , , I , o::::::o:III:II , , , I , CD
No ~No
No
No
No
I I I I I
~
Date
Barrel Ladder
Stand Pipes
Cat Walks
Movable Inspection System
Loose Concrete Checked?
APPRAISALS
67) Structure Evaluation 4
68) Deck Geometry N
69) Under Clear Vert & Horiz N
71) Waterway Adequacy 6
72) Approach Rdwy Alignment 8
113) Scour Critical
INSPECTION COMMENTS
~
(~4~
No
No
0.0 ft
ooo
CONDITION
Items 58 Thru 72 Checked By:
36) Traffic Safety Features:
A) Bridge Railings 0
B) Transitions 0
C) Approach Guardrail 0
D) Approach Guardrail End 0
58) Deck
59) Superstructure
60) Substructure
61) Channel & Chan. Protection
62) Culverts
REVIEWED BY M &~ ~
Fence Required
Fence Present
Fence Height
Fence Type
Fence Material
Fence Top Type
Inspected By: V~ & l}...~C~LOAD RATING AND POSTING
o ~ Evaluation Code J5 Year of Evaluation 1950
63.0 CD 70) Bridge Posting 5
5 41rstructure Status A
36.0 CD Open, no restriction
31) Design Load
63) Operating Rating Type
64) Operating Rating
65) Inventory Rating Type
66) Inventory Rating
-----------OTHER FEATURES
STRUCTURE EVALUATION IBridge Number 06656 NBIS Length
SHEET 2 OF 2 FORM BRI-19 REV 10/00 Town Name LITCHFIELD No 10
., i./ IFacility Carried ROUTE 202 -;HEET~ OF-----.:.L (INSP. REPORT
Feature Crossed BROOK
n Proposed Next Indepth Insp Year
n Senior
mp~ Supervisor
--
I
I
I
~I
ft
ADT I
tons I Actual P.L. 4Axle Truck tonstons Rec. P.L. 4Axle Truck tons
tons Actual P.L. 3S2 Truck tons
tons Rec. P.L. 3S2 Truck tons
tons Actual P.l. All Vehicles tons
ft in EEftft in It
mph
WATERWAY
o Not on national network
3 On Free Road
1 State Highway Agency
1 State Highway Agency
S STATE
o
CLASSIFICATION
No
1 On System
2 Rural Principal Arterial - Other
1 Defense Highway
N No parallel structure exists
2 2-way traffic
6799
o No navigation control on waterway
r=ITI 40) Navigation Horiz Clr. 0
oo Not applicable
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Other Posted Signs 1
Other Posted Signs 2
Actual P.L. Single Unit Truck
Rec. P.L. Single Unit Truck
Actual P.l. Semi-TrailerTruck
Rec. P.L. Semi-TrailerTruck
Rec. P.L. All Vehicles
Posted Vert Clearance On Bridge
Posted Vert UnderClearance
Posted Speed limit
Utility
DrainageBasinCode
38) Navigation Control
39) Navigation Vert Clr. 0
116) Vert-lift Brg Nav Min
111) Pier Abutment Protection
75A) Type of Work Proposed
75B) Work Done By
76) Length of Struct. Improvement - ft
94) Bridge Improvement Cost $
95) Roadway Improvement Cost $
96) Total Project Cost $
97) Year of Improvement Cost Est.
114) FutureADT I I I ~115)YearFuture
list No. Project No. Advertised
POSTED SIGNS & UTILITIES
112) NBIS Bridge Length
104) Highway System
26) Functional Class
100) Defense Highway
101) Parallel Structure
102) Direction of Traffic
103) Temporary Structure
110) Designated National Network
20) Toll
21) Maintain
22) Owner
Report Class
37) Historical Significance
Connecticut Department of Transportation
Non-Routine Bridge Inspection Report BRI-20
BRIDGE #: I 06656 I INSPECTION DATE: [9/19/2007 PREVIOUS INSPECTION DATE 14/24/2007
OTHER INSPECTIONS
D Freq. D Assigned To: I 01
D D I 01D I 01
SPECIAL: Type
FRACTURE:
UNDERWATER:
INSPECTION TYPE: ISpecial DESCRIPTION: CHECK CONDITION AND SHAPE SNOOPER REQUIRED: ~DIMENSIONS OF PIPE ARCH.
INSPECTION PERFORMED BY: 16 : '-- ----' SNOOPER USED: [§]FEATURE CARRIED: [ROUTE 202 1
FEATURE INTERSECTED: ISROOK 1
TOWN: IUTCHFIELO 1 YEAR BUILT: 11950 I
LOCATION: 11 MI S OF TORR. TL IYEAR REBUILT: DMAIN MATERIAL: ISteel IMAIN DESIGN: ICulvert (includes frame I
INSPECTION VISITS:
Start Time:1--:-:-:-:--:-:-:1
End Time:'--_----J
INSPECTORS:
Inspector: ICT.--'M""'u-rp""'hy--'
Inspector: 10. McClave
Task: ISPECIAL INSPECTION
Task: 1_" _
FEATURE INSPECTED:
A.C.C.M.P.P.A. WITH DETERIORATION AT INVERT AND HOLES RUSTED THROUGH CORRUGATIONS.
INSPECTION RESULTS:
THE INVERT PLATES HAVE 1 FOOT WIDE BANDS OF HEAVY LAMINAR RUST WITH SECTION LOSS AT WATER LINEALONG BOTH SIDES. THE UPPER 2/3 OF THE PIPE HAS ASPHALT COATING IN PLACE. THE FIRST 11 FEET AT INLETSHOWS HOLES COMPLETELY THROUGH BOnOM CORRUGATIONS 18 INCH LONG BY 2 INCHES WIDE ALONG NORTHSIDE. THERE IS A 6 FOOT SECTION OF INVERT THAT HAS CORRUGATIONS KINKED AND HEAVED UP SLIGHTLY. THEINLET BOnOM LIP HAS BEEN REPAIRED WITH CONCRETE. (SEE PHOTO) SMALL HOLES ARE WIDE SPREADTHROUGHOUT INVERT. RISE AND SPAN MEASUREMENTS WERE TAKEN. PAVEMENT HAS A FULL WIDTHTRANSVERSE CRACK OPEN 3/4 INCH. THERE ARE ALSO LONGITUDINAL AND RANDOM CRACKS.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN:
THIS CULVERT WILL CONTINUE TO BE CHECKED AT 6 MONTH INTERVALS.
Inspectors' Signatures: 1)
2)
3)
4)
P.E. Signature:
P.E.#:
Date: CLIL1/~7
Date: _tl Lf/~J
Date: -- I__ I_-
Date: -- I__ I_-
Date: -- I__ 1_-
Reviewed by: COOT
Printed on 9/19/2007 1:24:28 PM Page 1 of 1
LITCHFIELD, RT. 202 OVER BROOK, BRIDGE # 6656
RISE & SPAN DIMENSIONS
8' IN 33' IN 8'--OUTDATE8/24/2006 SPAN 9'-03" 9'-03 1/2" 9'-02 1/4"
RISE 6'-00" 6'-0 1/2" 6'-02"
4/24/2007 SPAN 9'-03 1/2" 9'-03 1/4" 9'-02 1/2"RISE 6'-00" 6'-01 " 6'-02 1/2"
9/19/2007 SPAN 9'-03" 9'-03 1/2" 9'-02 1/2"RISE 6'-00" 6'-0 1/2" 6'-02"