structure: how we made happiness

8/12/2019 Structure: How We Made Happiness

1/370

1

Structure: How We Made Happiness

By

Hope, Ora Ora Tiferetot, Ora, Stephanie, Penelope, Tob

Shbeeb, Tatania, Jenny, Arielle, Kelly, Pekhot, Grouchy,

Yafah, Kabbalah, Marion, Kathleen, Marbah, Donna,

Valerie, Shnoonah, Diana, Bertha, Shay, Amy, Marilyn,

Elaine, Teresa, Lizzie, Libby, Honey, Richard, and Billy

McBride


2/370

2

Copyright 2010, by William McBride

ISBN 978-0-557-53788-4


3/370

3

Dedicated to Marbah with Hesed


4/370

4

1.

(A.) Me notes map bebroughten into me beguiled sentences

follows a belettered resequencing of a down recycling. Me

resequencing of all thirty-four felt sentences of me Isaacs

dialectics by which a beguiled rain process of writing an

additional twelve further rain processes for us bringeth us

to a belightened evaporation process a little as one beethwriting an uphill full thirty-four and six besentenced lovely

scene. Uncertainty must belightenedly occureth before the

scene becrookedly can starteth.


5/370

5

(B.) Me mensuration beeth a process beloved which

explaineth me Terahs togethereth letter, his writing while a

soupy writing in full of a rain or befallen method of a page

of the uphill twenty-three sentences beeth beassembled.


6/370

6

(C.) In me evaporation, me Terahs loud letter beeth a rain-

process of writing a fully rain-processed page betied as me

Abrahams young poem attempteth me resequencing or me

beguiled recycling of the truth of me thirty-four truthful

sentences using eleven theses and, wholly, some new

synonyms down for change. How passeth and why beeth

this attempted?


7/370

7

(D.) Me truthful notes map bebroughten into me felt

sentences beeth me resequencing of me recycling as me

Isaacs dialectics beeth what me Isaac useth to revise me

Abraham and me Terah true, his father and good

grandfather.


8/370

8

3.

(A.) In me wilderness, me berained page by me Terah

beeth made by me digression and by me healing

argumentative. Tis me rain down to cometh without

prelude.


9/370

9

(B.) Me Terah reorders the coming page hence he hath

freedom more to beeth at work with greatly. This

happeneth with more limitation, me doth see.


10/370

10

(C.) A page may be befilled when me high argumentative

beeth over. This page beeth a wonder blank.


11/370

11

(D.) Also me Terah spendeth a double-hundred or so

patient words to complete the twenty-three good sentences.

These good sentences begin fragmatically.


12/370

12

(E.) Tis a process besparked to take a timeth of fourty-three

minutes. But, what beeth me bemirrored process, and how

dost me bemirrored process elaborate me to beeth

expressive.


13/370

13

(F.) The result beeth me islandish miracle. Me cause twas

me miracle to beeth greatly transitory.


14/370

14

4.

(A.) During me process of writing out eleven theses, me

Avraham chooseth twice-eleven sentences for me Terahs

page to cometh. Me Terah giveth over forever that page for

me Avraham angelic.


15/370

15

(B.) Tis me sentence that he putteth aside twas one that

beeth unlinked with me pairs of me twice-eleven in me

mind. To createth me pair, me sentences beeth given

canonically designated values which beeth alike, and beeth

beplaced into me pairs in me dreams. When thou addeth to

anything, tis thou relationships created to beeth still an

illusionary being that thou unity of addition beeth

impossible rigorously.


16/370

16

(C.) Next me pair beeth what me Avraham useth to createth

one new thesis out from me eleven writ. There beeth nary

option for him, for he cannot crosseth any boundaries

which cannot beeth crossed powerfully.


17/370

17

5.

(A.) Revenge-dialectics are a nightmare, a kind of

information-fool theory, YES, whereas, the Psalms of

David, they come down and are a kind of negative

technology-sayer theory.


18/370

18

(B.) Coming down, this is the shining difference of a war

between criticism and poetry, between astonishing Isaac

and King David. The gentleman Yitsak and King-sayer

David are not that closely related.


19/370

19

(C.) The difference is, yet, that the coming down of Psalms

makes a translation of what makes nightmare-information

or rather the evil givens, mindless.


20/370

20

(D.) And, the study of nightmare-information is what

comes of nothing as it turns the concrete into the abstract

and then, scholarly, back into the quest for the concrete.

Poetically, once these turns are made, one can spiritually

never return to ones crossed origins.


21/370

21

(E.) Suicidally, this is through a pure process which is not

ahistorical. What revenge is this? And, how does the

revenge of this become best used?


22/370

22

(F.) That is why the banal revenge-dialectic is seen more as

a coming down of a construction to be very well translated

into poetic terms of art by the poetic Psalm. Some consider

a grandiose poetic form a poetic Psalm, yet, they, in truth,

are mistaken because the vocabulary of a poetic form is the

abstraction.


23/370

23

6.

(A.) There are in time four driven old revenge-processes.


24/370

24

(B.) These are the revenge-processes of cold rain, far

evaporation, patient interpretation, and birth-recycling.

These revenge-processes do not wait to exist.


25/370

25

(C.) In time these revenge processes become more

perfectly concrete after we yield to and substitute the free

images for ideas. The separated past is greater than the wit

of and sensed quantity of the time of the future. These free

images separate from the difficult Minds perfection

forever.


26/370

26

(D.) This is the what Abram made in the way that David

sublimely corrects. David, perhaps, in his calling, contrary

to your history, did or did not descend represented from

Abram.


27/370

27


28/370

28

(E.) And, by this day, from this descendance is how one

especially becomes a descendant, by a hated correction. In

this calling, this change is a tales error.


29/370

29

(F.) Each sentence has a well word, like, when born, each

well paragraph has a sentence. Not every fathers sentence

is a fathers sentence.


30/370

30

7.

(A.) The revenge dialectics of Yitsak study the Books

argumentative ways. Creative arguments become ignored

by the sports of us.


31/370

31

(B.) The coming-down Psalms of the seer David are, by his

method, sacred songs.


32/370

32

(C.) Completely sacred ideas can be complete ritualistic

ideas. The concrete completion of all rituals engenders the

loss of all of our profanities.


33/370

33

(D.) And, the loss of our ritualistic ideas is in no way of a

certain poetic order. Therefore, no way is ritualistically

certain.


34/370

34

(E.) The coming-down Psalms of the seer David study the

laws of the creativity of born Terah, born Abram, born,

Yitsak, born Yakov, born Yosef, to himself. Whos sport is

he? And, for thou, how does he let be himself, and why

does he fit concretely in?


35/370

35

(F.) Love, it is a concrete study of a bitter influence, a

study to read of misread creations. To hear and to create

are love, to act original.


36/370

36

9.

(A.) The songs of me David touch me Isaacs labors, and

they beeth soft grasses, skillful grasses, and skillful songs

of me mind. The better that one singeth, the less becometh

it ones true song of fire.


37/370

37

(B.) The songs of me David touch the gardeners who beeth

for soft grasses, as skillful grasses may beeth formed into

skillful songs powerfully. There will occur a time when me

singing wilt not beeth so difficult to crosseth.


38/370

38

(C.) A touching of the fruit to the seed beeth a good

touching; and tis thus a touching of me gardenings and soft

grasses beautiful. The grasses beeth something to beeth

thought of in me mind.


39/370

39

10.

(A.) Me Terahs writ beeth likened to his shape making.


40/370

40

(B.) Me Terahs music beeth done in a raineth way. The

rain stayeth up above.


41/370

41

(C.) Me David can maketh a Psalm; and, he can

additionally inspire me Isaac to maketh a dialectical.


42/370

42

(D.) Me Jacob must studyeth the remarkable idea of

Vicoean creativity.


43/370

43

(E.) Me Vico sayeth that tis me creative by me poet that

beeth the only thing which he understand. Tis in his act of

saying whence he becometh confused.


44/370

44

(F.) Tis me map-matrix that beeth formed for specifically

me Isaac and me Jacob together. To formeth something, it

beeth useful nary to addeth hence to it; tis to beeth left be.


45/370

45

11.

(A.) Tis me seemingly random process, me raindropping.

Tis to seemeth that everything hath a purpose.


46/370

46

(B.) Tis also me process to beeth notetaking. Tis this

process which beeth standing alone.


47/370

47

(C.) And, tis me raindropping of Terah which can beeth in

comparison to me notetaking of me Jacob, and of me Isaac.

Me notetaking becometh me literal act of translation.


48/370

48

(D.) Also, me Isaac doth figure out me contradictions

which so beeth in opposition to me praise.


49/370

49

(E.) Me praise beeth what me Jacob intendeth for his

descendents. How and what kind of praise beeth given?


50/370

50

(F.) Me Joseph and me King David beeth me Jacobs

descendants who learned how to praiseth. Giving praise

taketh no effort for them.


51/370

51

12.

(A.) Me forces beeth me abstractions. There beeth nary

such things as me forces, depending.


52/370

52

(B.) They beeth twice-fixed by me Isaac within his

framework of me Abrahams poem-map. Me framework

can nary beeth in repetition so that new ideas mayeth be.


53/370

53

(C.) And, to me Abraham, as me forces beeth abstract in

me poem-map, so beeth me forces in me abstractive in me

stereotomical.


54/370

54

(D.) There beeth many stages in me stereotomical. Me

stereotomy mayeth be defined as me process of bereducing

a single form.


55/370

55

(E.) Tis too me construction which beeth concretical,

abstractical, resequenced, and recycled back into me

concretical. Me concretic essences must nary beeth shared.


56/370

56

(F.) Yonder construction processes beeth me very elements

of me study of me stereotomical. Thou dost nary have to

worketh hard whilst in thy study.


57/370

57

13.

(A.) Me Jacob doth in truth maketh me dealings in me

forces. Yet, his actions beeth in sincerity.


58/370

58

(B.) Me Joseph dealeth with all of his right power; and, me

King David maketh me forces of me forces into me rest.

Me poor Joseph.


59/370

59

(C.) Me verbs beeth me forces sometimes. What doth

beeth else but yonder me immobile verbs?


60/370

60

(D.) Thus, from me Terah to me David me forces beeth

used. What beeth forces How doth me forces get put into

me play?


61/370

61

(E.) But, me force can beeth contained which beeth me

Davids skill. Me force alone beeth all, nary else beeth in

inclusion.


62/370

62

(F.) Me containment can neither hap by me writ nor by me

means of me scuplt of me mass. Me writ beeth nary me

way but an impossibility of me deed.


63/370

63

15.

(A.) This instant me Jacob-notes, a sign of me notes map,

mighty lost beeth to become for me Isaac.


64/370

64

(B.) Land! Me Jacob-notes in time! even to be faced

protothesis for me fountain of me Abraham. Waters me

protothesis so bloody actual; so there is me beauty, so no

need to worry or to care if they be twinkly of mine options;

unlocketh them as they are met!


65/370

65

(C.) But, for me Joseph, me Terah, and me King David, me

Jacob-notes so dyeth in use defendingly in me different

way beformed that all me ways me beareth, leadeth to the

idea that methinks in me divinity me notes be cripple all in

the same in me bewooden way.


66/370

66

(D.) For meanest me King David, me Jacob-notes beturn

into thy divided song that mine ole Jacob-notes changeth

not to mine own periods.


67/370

67

(E.) For me Joseph, ladies, me Jacob-notes are brought by

me infantude to thy abstraction,a besung contemplation

bewarred, that there in me low, be me action and me way,

be in abstraction winkily.


68/370

68

(F.) And ripe! for me Terah, me Jacob-notes, a version of

me Terahs echoing individual word-beheld fragments,

eternal so writ me moaneth in thy usual rainy process that

the fierce, only beseen, fragments existing be thine

betaught ones of which me draweth, alas, and none, so, so

help whatsoever thine to promote.


69/370

69

16.

(A.) Me Jacobs singing notes becometh abstracted fiercely,

but me Jacobs-notes indeed ameet take out me abstractive

meself as their subject and their matter. Me Joseph spareth,

and neither giveth the troop nor recieveth!


70/370


71/370

71

(C.) Astandeth me sentences by me Jacob menstruated,

recycled, resequenced. How presume thou that they be

resequenced? Come now, what exactly doth happen i

thine eyes?


72/370

72

(D.) Then me majesty, King David doth learn by me

Joseph; and much doth write me new sequence that

breaketh into song alive. Me song be me voice periodic

from early past, so me hunch canst be bestorily recorded.


73/370

73

(E.) Tis a berounded traditional follows astriven me one

which me Abraham angelically begun by writ iluck. A

poem-map cometh, which be me part of a resequencing

bemoaned of me Terah.


74/370

74

(F.) Wither Isaac doth cometh the same too? How

powerfully be he so done? Who, to all, doth he thinketh

ihumanity be he?


75/370

75

17.

(A.) Me dialectics be winded be very longeth. Me

meditations not me be winded dialectics be periodically

longeth fed. Me myself besprinkled beeth fixed upon this

sunny point which be begentled.


76/370

76

(B.) They me feareth be longeth because me navigator,

Isaac bestudies fatherdom nerdly in depth. Fatherhood be

in conclusion befriended to be me surfacing of me best

meditations. This periodically be me eloquent bepiled

statement being beformlessed.


77/370

77

(C.) Me Isaacs writs beframe me Abrahams standed

poeticals. So whoso really maketh me Isaac? How must

doth me Isaac beareth relation clear to me other? Tis nary

played memorable, yet splendidly tis familiar to me in me

thoughts.


78/370

78

(D.) Me beautified map that it giveth in me framework be

me map of besubistuted done variables. Thus, when writ

me names on me map into gold bechangeth. Tis of water

strongest; and tis best benary of invention.


79/370

79

(E.) To useth creatively me map taketh me beskilled

dedication. Tis foolishly easy to giveth madly me thou

love. Me doth wonder why for good me sayeth such, yet

me angelisms art of importance, me thanked me God, to

utter.


80/370

80

(F.) Tis what linketh featly in me Isaac to me Joseph, me

bestranged outsider. What be more of beauty and why nary

becovenanted to taketh the time periodically to seeketh for

such as mine; thus shalt teach we?


81/370

81

18.

(A.) Thereafter me way categorically opened to me to be to

heareth for me to hear the hung sound of me words and to

associateth it in immediate height with nother words.

There art nary such things bekingdomed as thy words.


82/370

82

(B.) Me beareth such me next thing to do hedgingly be to

taketh me associated beruined words and to figureth me

hedging out-side, and wherefor falleth it befooled upon me

map.


83/370

83

(C.) Me bulwarked associated words art beglorified that

hath bejavelined in limitation me now a number because as

me breathe, as me Isaac practiceth, less art in need to be

associateth, aye. Thou in thy feeding hath nary to haveth

to decline to thyself at all any reason in thy own anxieties

as to betossed why for art thou studieth.


84/370

84

(D.) Hereaft bespinning me findeth whereat me belayed

words falleth, me Isaac now knoweth why for and whereat

me awrestled words standeth in me resequentation. Me be

withered knowledges to be becometh of all of us hath, to

thou, orders bespinning of which tis an impossibility

beheld to me to comprehended.


85/370

85

(E.) Catagorically me Abraham be nary done just in silence

by me resequencitations, but also in me finding of me

beechoed genralizations of places, thine bevisual places of

thine places, yes. These echoes of thine places canst be in

thy unions only to to beeth bebuilteth recitationly when me

hath beseparated them from betearing part one nother.


86/370

86

(F.) To be beknowing of whereat me Abrahams kindheart

sayings art alocated beeth, in thine own beginnings, to

understandeth in thy person how to frameth them writs

with me bedelivered dialectations. This mine usefulness of

me words doth justify their asinging skills besoothened.


87/370

87

19.

(A.) Me paintings revealeth a greatness in thy signification.

Such me paintings behideth to me thy fact of their

begreyed bedullment bewithered in thine bewildered

unimportances.


88/370

88

(B.) There art as well many of me paintings bequeathed

which art either to be me reduction or in me posterity to be

me interpretive chant. We of the kingdom hath no choice

left of which beyondered future will cometh in thine

echoes.


89/370

89

(C.) Me paintings echoing canst be besubsituted for me

other interpretations. Me paintings mirrored badly only to

themselves.


90/370

90

(D.) Such bebroughten painting be me Josephs bebattled

realm. Aye, much in disappearance hath beoccurred in me

competitive.


91/370

91

(E.) And, mindfully me criticism thy misseth be for me

Jacob, me Joseph and me King David courageous to doeth.

Tis a bemarbled disappearing takes me begaped efforts.


92/370

92

(F.) Me paintings of thy troop connecteth me imagery

beintimidated with me ideas, but me bringeth these in ideas

which art nary mine own.


93/370

93

20.

(A.) Me biographical livelihood be of importance. To

liveth partially be to dieth unpleasantly.


94/370

94

(B.) So up art me ancient day stories beluxuried with me

interpretive to come which me canst not connect. Tis me

ancient be tossed stories that doth pointeth out to me

somethings.


95/370

95

(C.) And, in thy readings so art me other stories,

methodical post-Miltonic, which doth me giveth to bedrive

me interpretive, which me toucheth upon. Nary me

bemoaned that me story canst describeth me beshavened

somethingeth befeated or some event, or, Lord, some place.


96/370

96

(D.) Tis me fatherly eloquence of me interpretive and

forthward of me intertextual which doth maketh bitterly me

a way in me understanding of me beruined selfhood which

in thou love thou doeth. Why heavens, actually, me in me

method doeth that and thou doeth bejudge not that

bebittered.


97/370


98/370

98

(F.) But, me styles bedarkened of me writ art wonderously

what Nature in a truth bebroken mayeth beeth. Nature

bescurries to beeth to thou illusionative!


99/370

99

21.

(A.) It wert behanded from me Tolstoy to me knoweth me

Jacob belearned forthward how to composeth longer in

autobiography. Me Tolstoys buzz be stopped teaching

long long for us ago.


100/370

100

(B.) Me Richard in his beguilement wert to beeth his

besorrifulled tutor on berolling me Tolstoy. Then me

Tolstoy doth becometh the tutor.


101/370

101

(C.) Me Richard in his recline sayeth that we knoweth that

we needeth gurus, but nary beneedeth priests. Priests of

beheighteness art besilented people, tis true.


102/370

102

(D.) This greatly mightst relateth towards a bewithering of

me Tolstoys Rousseauism. Me Tolstoy hadst bewithered

and had heldeth nary beliefs.


103/370

103

(E.) Me Richard in his barity also wouldst beeth in

dispitutation best with me Tolstoy over the arts of the

besignificances hived of bechanged vocabularies make

change?


104/370

104

(F.) Bout me Hadji Murad, why he be Tolstoys bested,

bestranged, and beshortened story. Tis his mortal best; tis

yet wherefor there to cometh?


105/370


106/370

106

(B.) Bewandering, whyfor?


107/370


108/370

108

(D.) Tis me curious Ein Soph which beeth me Primordial

Adam felteth, who beeth unbefallen, and me God in

accordance becreatured me Kabbalists. Me all-be

knowing, thou, God liveth be.


109/370

109

(E.) Me meditations over in me beobservations of me twice

thrice gardeners be an undertune of what beeth men of

importance for the be distinction to me Jacob. What in me

comings must beeth done atumbling but action and help?


110/370

110

23.

(A.) Fiercely me Rorty bekept can beeth bedemanded to

beeth me Joseph.


111/370

111

(B.) Slowly me Tolstoy can beeth me Jacob actor wholly

Tolstoy doth not haveth bedropped of any choice.


112/370

112

(C.) Me Genius, me Harold Bloom, can be me Avraham.

My dove, sayeth that he would rather beshingingly existeth

than upeth pre-exist.


113/370

113

(D.) On break, me Avraham usefully can also beeth in this

world me Rorty because of his bescratching of his eleven

bespun theses which on the boat reflecteth me Rortys

eleven besaid intellectual theses.


114/370

114

(E.) Me Tolstoy betrailled be me Jacob; and me soul, me

Freud, me Joseph. Me bequesth that me Tolstoy has no

besaddened name.


115/370

115

(F.) Lastly this remindeth of a gift of me David thinker, that

his paintings of flowers beeth an illumination abstracteth

over bewhitened abstractions. Specific instances

beshadowed, and bebroughten or begeneraled-way notions

beeth nary helpful.


116/370

116

(G.) Falling thus me King David may beeth much me

Rousseau, me Henri Rousseau. And, we seeth, me

Rousseau beeth nary truthfully becalled Rousseau

anymore.


117/370

117

25.

(A.) That from clinging to me Isaacs blessings to what me

shorter workings beeth the path that plenty will leadeth to

new letters. Lonely, the walled up future dost not

rhythmically taketh us anywhere this night if we do not

follow.


118/370

118

(B.) Tis best that me organizing of me books, that me writ

in me dimness, leadeth to me organizing of me dim books

in me library. Disorder befallen becometh order.


119/370

119

(C.) Hey! me Joseph teaches the pragmatics of

resequencing. Me Joseph materially falleth from his

duties.


120/370

120

(D.) Resequencing the coming of me Terahs rain dropped

beguiled page beeth good for me Avraham. Resequencing

beeth with everything, a repeating of an episode.


121/370

121

(E.) However, lonely, to reviseth me Avraham, me falling

Isaac resequenceth, with his own sentences, peacefully me

Avrahams resequencing of sentences. Peacefully me

Avraham doeth nothing in his own mind.


122/370

122

(F.) Beautifully the teachings of doing so beeth

pragmatically because today the mocking son must goeth

yonder to beguile the dim fathers read writ. In ofference,

no son beeth crookedly in debt to his father.


123/370

123

26.

(A.) Me rain of me words cometh first. By me rain I

mean me dropping.


124/370

124

(B.) Then tis me rain of clauses before me mensuration,

me recycling, and me resequencing which cometh next.

One beeth unable to put me a limit to yonder rhythms.


125/370

125

(C.) Me rain sentences by using me a map cometh last.

Tis me rain mayeth ruin me map.


126/370

126

(D.) Me Abraham raineth me sentences and me causes.

Me sentence doth nary follow me sentence. Nay that any

sentence followed another.


127/370

127

(E.) Then me Terah raineth me words. Me Terah

followeth nary system and therefore he doth not maketh

any progress.


128/370

128

(F.) And, me Isaac rains more of me rained words, first,

into me clauses and, second, into me sentences, while me

Joseph rains me clauses and me sentences. Me patriarchs

beeth in existence far beyond our own time, and they doth

beeth not in simultaneity with it nor with each others.


129/370

129

27.

(A.) Me library of me Terah beeth situated. By me library

me meaneth to say me study-place.


130/370

130

(B.) Me Terahs library consisteth first of all of his rained

pages which art uncollected.


131/370

131

(C.) And, second, me Terahs library consisteth of me early

early work BEFORE THE PAINTINGS. What cometh

before beeth me mystery.


132/370

132

(D.) In BEFORE THE PAINTINGS tis reined with some

organization and evaporation. It cometh all; it wilt nary

raineth again.


133/370

133

(E.) In me rained pages there beeth nary any particular

evaporations or orderings. Where doth it hap? Why doth it

hap in that place?


134/370

134

(F.) That beeth what makes it close to me King Lears style,

and whay it must beeth me revision by me Avraham. Thou

needeth nary reasons to giveth any reasons.


135/370

135

28.

(A.) Me library of me Jacob beeth besituated. Me libraries

beeth just places, tis all.


136/370


137/370

137

(C.) Me SHUFFLED beeth just a part of me entire notes

which beeth me Jacobs. Tis a whole to beeth in existence

when me parts containeth me parts within me parts.


138/370

138

(D.) Me SHUFFLED beeth in me volume one, also called

THE PROJECT. I only calleth by its one name.


139/370


140/370

140

(F.) Tis me rest of Jacobs library to consisteth of me notes

which sometimes helpeth David by way of me Joseph, and

besometimes nary. What doth remain beeth something

which we have nary choice in me experiencing.


141/370

141

29.

(A.) Me libraries of me Joseph and of me Abraham beeth

situated. Tis me libraries which beeth in always change.


142/370


143/370

143

(C.) Me non-rained notes beeth me volumes by me author

Solomon Bloom which beeth not rained.


144/370

144

(D.) Me Solomon Bloom also becometh Abraham when me

notes which beeth rained beeth in me organization as in me

AT THE GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES. Me concept of

rain beeth literal language only, what else could it beeth?


145/370

145

(E.) Me Isaacs library beeth what me Joseph reviseth.

What beeth this what??


146/370

146

(F.) Me Abraham reviseth me Terahs rained pages in AT

THE GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES. He keepeth his

notes to himself.


147/370


148/370

148

30.

(A.) Me libraries of me Isaac beeth situated. Me Isaac can

haveth a library but he stayeth at home.


149/370

149

(B.) Me Isaacs library consisteth of me DIALECTICS.

Me Isaac stayeth at home.


150/370


151/370

151

(D.) Me DIALECTICS reviseth Abrahams writ of AT THE

GATE WITH THE FOLKTALES, and me few

UNCOLLECTED WRITINGS also by A braham. Me

revisionary process can hap only once in me time.


152/370

152

(E.) Me Isaacs library beeth what Jacob reviseth. Men

reviseth women; women reviseth men.


153/370

153

(F.) Me Jacob does this nary literally, but in a new way, by

revealing me structure of me influences of me fathers upon

me creations.


154/370


155/370

155

(B.) Me Davids library consisteth, first, of his PSALMS,

second, of his SERMONS, and, third, of his early short

work which he calleth THE UNEASINESS OF THE

MOON. Nary a one belistens to his sermons.


156/370

156

(C.) In me PSALMS, me David transforms me Jacobs

ideas of influence into beimagery. Me influence cometh

from me stars.


157/370

157

(D.) In me SERMONS, me David uses me style of Horace

to learned about me writs structure while becoming

confident for me sake of me own study of me notes. Nary

one becometh beconfident who tis not already.


158/370

158

(E.) And, in THE UNEASINESS OF THE MOON, me

David begineth to seteth me imagery in me motion with a

paean to the M.O.A.T., to James Joycean visionary

paintings, and to drawing chaotically.


159/370


160/370

160

32.

(A.) Me Terah provideth me a skeleton bestructure for me

David to giveth to me Jacob who doth giveth it back to me

David upon working upon it.


161/370

161

(B.) He giveth who provideth, me Terah doth. He giveth

me a gift of nothing.


162/370

162

(C.) What beeth the big gifts of me skeleton structures,

which beeth only what Jacob seeth when he beeth

receiving?


163/370

163

(D.) Me provision of me pattern cometh because me Jacob

holds out his hands for a gift to beeth given yon this time.


164/370


165/370

165

(F.) When me gardeners happily shareth, it mayeth be that

me Jacob, as me gardener, beeth never done. Only one

gardener canst ever completeth his task.


166/370

166

(G.) Me David beeth nary worrisome over me Jacob about

what beeth bevalued to me David in those many givings.

Thou dost not have to accepteth what thou art given.


167/370

167

33.

(A.) To me poem-maps events and notes, let them beeth

me antitheticals and me theticals. Me names on me maps

causeth me places to existeth.


168/370

168

(B.) And, yet me dialectics may beeth me events and me

notes bout a larger event of a new set of notes over a

newly beborn antithetical. Tis this story beeth very old.


169/370

169

(C.) Tis this new dialectical event beeth me Jacobs, beeth

me scene, bestudied. Nary anybody careth bout me new

ideas any more.


170/370

170

(D.) In me event of me Isaacs combined with me Jacobs

notes beeth larger events that me Jacob formeth by analogy

after being compared side by side with me Isaac when me

Jacob beframeth and beexpands his volumes studies of

events and comparisons. Only the beblinded can compareth

me forms accurately.


171/370

171

(E.) Being that me Joseph worketh, the volume existeth.

(F.) As for me Josephs becollecting of his volume and

others, tis the event for which an even larger scene formeth

because it beeth a total study of these events because me

Jacob respondeth to me Terah, and me Abraham, to me

Isaac, to me Joseph, and to me King David. There beeth

nary a reason whatsoever for what hap.


172/370


173/370


174/370

174

(C.) Me permutation tis what dost this by its tool. Our

tools beeth primitive.


175/370

175

(D.) And, from nothing cometh belief which beeth rain for

me. Beliefs becometh powerless.


176/370


177/370

177

(F.) So me combineth these four for one sentence when this

beeth me method of me thetical creative.


178/370

178

36.

(A.) Me criticism leadeth me back to me belief. What

beeth criticism? How and why wouldst any nother

maketh any criticism?


179/370

179

(B.) Me criticism, which meaneth me Aristotle, seperateth

me contradictions; and tis this which beeth also me

Hegelian.


180/370

180

(C.) Me sentence criss-crossing, adding formulas to me

series, one sentence standeth alone, mayeth many build up

more for me possible scholarships crit; and, tis it which

maketh me second of me cycle. All cycles beeth beblanded

and bemudded.


181/370

181

(D.) A through K beeth me eleven pairs. Me eleven

pairs maketh eleven theses. Addeth one single and you

hath twice-seventeen.


182/370

182

(E.) Most of me poems which me write beeth Romantic or

Romances (me genre). Me hath never writ me poem.


183/370


184/370


185/370

185

(B.) Me notes mayeth be made into a type of poem if thou

looketh at them as me proto-notes. Nary a one hath ever

actually seen my notes.


186/370

186

(C.) Decoding the first word that popeth into thine mind

when looking at thou word, thou sentence, or thou clause

beeth a kind of association which beeth translated into one

of me solitaries on me Map of Misprison.


187/370


188/370

188

(E.) Me maketh me cycle/sequences for all three of more

microcosms or macrocosms. Me three beeth enough.


189/370

189

38.

(A.) Me Monuments Across Texas beeth me metaphor for

me idea of putting shapes within me form, which beeth me

part of me stereotomical, me first level of me six.


190/370

190

(B.) Tis this which beeth necessary to thinketh of me proto-

poem (rain) or letter as something that in itself encourageth

reading because even it, in its first stage, has some order,

sequence, and use (coherence). Therefore, one either hath

all of it or nary.


191/370

191

(C.) Tis it that beeth the very reason to writeth me proto-

poem, or me good enough reason at least. Any reading

produces more uncertainty.


192/370

192

(D.) Nother type of carving beeth me stereotomical. We

hath been talking bout me stereotomical this whole time.


193/370


194/370

194

(F.) Findeth out me my-designing reading sequence. Me

doubt that me hath ever actually really designed anything.


195/370

195

39.

(A.) Findeth in a my-notes reading sequence. Me doth

nary keepeth any notes. Tis beeth nary the case that me

readeth one word after nother.


196/370

196

(B.) Me words acteth as parts which can subistuteth for

whole sentences. Words beeth neither parts nor wholes.


197/370

197

(C.) Me rain process in its concretic form beeth a

satirical concept. To thinketh satirically beeth forbidden.


198/370

198

(D.) Me recognize mine own usage of such technique of

me ideas in this best way to packeth in as many ideas as

possible within a limited space.


199/370

199

(E.) Only me framework shalt guideth me framework as me

dialectic. Tis this framework which beeth built which

accomplishes nothing.


200/370

200

(F.) So thus me hath me rained page. Nothing hath been

done, or shalt beeth done to it.


201/370

201

40.

(A.) So beeth it that me hath me interpretive extensions

numbering eleven.


202/370

202

(B.) Me hath me process of me thesaurus mensuration. Me

thesaurus beeth not mine.


203/370

203

(C.) Me hath me recycling process for me resequencing.

Tis me reason for me recycling which beeth an uncertainty.


204/370

204

(D.) Me hath nother rain process - Tis me notes-

fragments. All the rain cometh at once and hence shalt nary

cometh anymore.


205/370


206/370

206

(F.) Me hath me notes as me framework and as me

framework-connector sentences (or interpretations). All we

or anybody ever writeth beeth ever just notes.


207/370

207

41.

(A.) Me hath me character represent, limit, and substitute,

plus beeth me narrator. Completing me catalogue meaneth

to addeth even more to it even when it beeth in completion

filled.


208/370

208

(B.) Me hath me limiter and me representative bestudy me

horizontal analogies of me matrix of me first rain extended

poem.


209/370

209

(C.) Tis this which beeth done by permuting almost all me

considerations horizontally, metaphorically of me maps,

that beeth me poems structure.


210/370

210

(D.) Me final abstractive resequenceth me twice-seventeen

final statements of me limiter, me representative, me

substituter as well as me six statements of me scene by me

narrator. Me did nary write this sentence.


211/370

211

(E.) Me scene becharteth me subject of me ratios using me

analogy of some six step construction in addition; and, tis

this construction which beeth transumed.


212/370

212

(F.) Tis me dialectic that beeth complete.


213/370

213

42.

(A.) Me notes bestudy me event that beeth me literary

event of me reading; tis this that beeth me separate event

from me rain surprise. Just because it beeth raining doth

nary meaneth that something beeth happening.


214/370


215/370

215

(C.) Me rain page can lead to me twenty-three sentences.


216/370

216

(D.) Me rain notes hath me twice-six sentences.


217/370

217

(E.) Me stage one mensuratioon beeth synonymical.


218/370

218

(F.) Me eleven theses useth me four types of me

interpretative. If me numbers could actually beeth useth

for anything, then me everything would already have

happened.


219/370


220/370

220

(B.) Me recycling of me page and me extentions which

beeth me theses maketh twice-seventeen sentences. Tis it

which beeth nothing to beeth measured.


221/370

221

(C.) Me stage three mensuration happens for me

beresequenced berecycled notes. Thou shalt never seeth

these notes.


222/370

222

(D.) Me twice-six antitheses, me substitutions notes, beeth

complete. Me completion beeth always in the process of

coming.


223/370

223

(E.) Me stage four mensurateth for me beresequencing both

for me final stage and for me final notes. Me hath forgot

about me notes.


224/370

224

(F.) Me framework beeth addeth. Whyfor? Howfor beeth

me framework done exactly?


225/370

225

44.

(A.) Me scenes beeth added as me writeth by using me

analogies voiced by me characters. The final act beeth a

real one.


226/370

226

(B.) Me dialectic beeth in me completion.


227/370

227

(C.) Me literacy beinvolves me substitutive which beeth a

kind of thinking of ideas, possibly beseparated ideas, when

me reading, when me reading beeth me event. When you

thinketh that you beeth reading you actually beeth

daydreaming instead.


228/370

228

(D.) Tis this substitutional which me calleth mine note-

map; and me event or me reading which me calleth me

note-map. Me text for me poem cannot beeth seen.


229/370

229

(E.) Each beeth rained, digressive-argumentative.

Nothing ever happened to anybody.


230/370


231/370

231

(B.) In me larger picture it beeth me individuals response

to me surprise which beeth great.


232/370

232

(C.) Me surprise createth me demand for me individuals

response. Yet, thou beeth never required to respondeth.


233/370

233

(D.) Tis this beeth because greatness must beeth

bemeasured; and, me substitutive beeth me measuring

beprocess. To measureth beeth the same as to beeth

inactive.


234/370

234

(E.) Combining by dialective by me scene me poem-map

and me notes-map beeth the studying of me idea of

influence between me father poet and me son poet, ephebe.

We all feeleth such influences bephysically.


235/370


236/370

236

46.

(A.) To returneth to reading, literacy, me must transume me

poem-map, and nary a whole dialectic into me concept of

me poem. In order to doeth something me must nary doeth

anything.


237/370


238/370

238

(C.) So with me dialectical me hath a work of crit twixt me

father part and me son part of me.


239/370


240/370

240

(E.) Howfor the son structureth me father beeth what me

dialectic accomplisheth. Talking and/or working out me

argument doeth more harm than good.


241/370


242/370

242

(G.) That beeth why tis nary necessary to taketh full notes

because even fragmentary ones mayeth be in completion;

even utterances mayeth be understood as whole

propositions, even as whole paragraphs. Nobody at all

guideth me seeing.


243/370

243

47.

(A.) Me characteristicals of me limiter, me substitutive, and

me reprehensive beeth just the aspects of me son.


244/370


245/370

245

(C.) As me scene of instruction compareth one poet with

another, so another scene mayeth compare one process of

six steps as the metaphor for another process. Nothing can

beeth allowed when such a time cometh to me available.


246/370

246

(D.) Me two recycled processes hath one proto-poem and

one note-taking literacal. Nary any whole ever hath been

separated into its parts.


247/370

247

(E.) Me twice-seventeen end relationships studied beeth of

me twice eleven metaphorical and me twice six

metalaptical, or me transumptive.


248/370

248

(F.) Of me two concretical rain processes, one beeth done

using me complete grammatical sentences and one beeth

done with me fragments. Tis there to beeth more to beeth

done after thou hath finished all of thou tasks.


249/370

249

48.

(A.) Me goal of me interpretation beeth to beeth in

coherence.


250/370

250

(B.) Tis that which meaneth that everything which beeth

valuable must beeth understood.


251/370

251

(C.) Tis this which meaneth that me work must beeth done

to followed up and to wrapeth up me instructive thinking.

Me work, therefore, beeth meaningless.


252/370

252

(D.) And, tis that which meaneth that me framework should

emergeth out of me notes which frameth me event which

doth get interpreted by me notes. Me events beeth

occurances which hap artificially.


253/370

253

(E.) Tis this me framework and me notes which beeth what

maketh up me second map. Me one map beeth enough.


254/370


255/370

255

49.

(A.) Me second map of me influences, me ephebes notes,

doth get menstruated twice-once. Tis these me maps which

doth nary showed me distances twixt various places.


256/370

256

(B.) And, finally, both of me maps doth get menstruated

making four betotaled mensurations in totality for me

entire dialectic. Me total dialectic beeth still in me process

of being workethed out.


257/370

257

(C.) If me mensuration beeth me rain process of me

designator numbers, then me other rain process dealeth

with either me grammatical fit of me words out of me

sequence of time, being me digressive and/or being to me

argument, or tis it which dealeth with me fragmentary note

taking in me non-temporal sequence too, but in me

completely proto-structured way. Tis it beeth it; it hath

only ever once in me actuality raineth.


258/370


259/370

259

(E.) Such me writ technique beeth special to understand.

Yet, me understanding beeth nary saught.


260/370

260

50.

(A.) Me ability to mensurateth entaileth me understanding

of howfor to translate me spontaneous imaginary voice into

me canonically designated number. Me hath no ability to

understand. Me Michael respecteth and beeth excited by

this.


261/370

261

(B.) Me sound of me word canst beeth heard within me

inner ear. Me sounds beeth externally beyond me listner.

Me Avraham bepondereth and beseeketh his solitude to

sayeth this.


262/370

262

(C.) Me spontaneous word connecteth to me word of me

subject and thus maketh for me mine hold. Me words

canst nary beeth fixed because they beeth too slippery for

to beest set. Me Isaac avoideth and crazeth himself over

this.


263/370


264/370

264

(E.) Me subject and me number now hath a place. Me

subject canst nary beeth measured by me other signs. Me

saying this beeth for me Joseph beirregular and beexotic.


265/370

265

(F.) Any place can beeth used as me single within me

bigger structure, beusually of twice-three beseparated

partitions - me sentence. Me twice-three beeth small and

therefore beeth an easy number to meditateth upon. Me

David thinketh this beeth a minute and back-tracking

detail.


266/370

266

51.

(A.) What beeth me vision? What beeth me part of speech,

city of Houston, or et caetera, me pun with me cities, me fit

of it into me sentence, and all me work? Me work beeth

nary to beeth questioned; tis it to beeth ceased.


267/370


268/370

268

(C.) Me part of speech, tis changeable. Whyfor tis

changeable? Howfor tis changeable?


269/370

269

(D.) Me Thalia inventeth me grammar and me parts of

speech as me Erato inventeth me twice-three steps as me

Melpomene inventeth . . . me Uraniame Polyhymnia,

translation. Yet, what beeth an inventive canst beeth

translateth.


270/370


271/370

271

(F.) Me Mousae inventeth me poets inspiration to

communicateth. Me poets inspiration beeth personal.


272/370

272

(G.) Me language beeth either as being poetical depending

on who it. Nary all beeth poetical.


273/370

273

(H.) Me Houston, me city close to me county; Tis Jacobean

whereas me county beeth Isaacian.


274/370

274

(I.) Tis represented by me map Tis this map which beeth

lost.


275/370

275

(J.) Me map provideth me source for choosing names of

streets, et caetera, to further punneth upon them. Me puns

doth nary lead us anywhere.


276/370

276

(K.) Me city beeth Jacobean, it becometh neighborhood,

home Jacobean, and befinally Davidian, or Knesset Yisroel.

And, tis this home that hath yet to beeth built.


277/370


278/370

278

(M). Thus, me useth me neighboorhood, Eternity, and

connected homes streets splendid to passeth out onto me

Joseph, as me individual and me covenant, who passeth me

names for me David to punneth upon, who then giveth

them to me Terah a rain maker, and to me Abraham to

sorteth things out. When me name beeth said it goeth into

one ear and yet nary reacheth its mark. Tis me gift

anonymous beeth given by nother.


279/370


280/370

280

(O.) Me Jacob translateth or mediatateth after me unbelief,

with me non-knowledge, or me secret knowledge. In

translation, me non-knowledge beeth revealed.


281/370

281

(P.) Tis this beeth me city. Tis this which disappeareth.


282/370

282

(Q.) While me Isaac beeth involved in me punning-

dialogue, he tradeth to me Jacob me recitational ability

which beeth me city. Me Jacob quieteth down. We hath

forgotten the names of me streets.


283/370

283

(R.) Tis this final trade which endureth confidence, which

bringeth us back to belief, to me America, and me

Emersonianism. In me end me shalt goeth on.


284/370

284

(S.) Me America shalt transfer to me statehood of me parts

of speech, while me state shalt transfereth its energy to me

counties of me puns, me puns on me street names. Me

United States of America hath no boundaries.


285/370


286/370

286

(U.) Tis this beeth why me recitation must restoreth me

confidence, me America being me confidence, which shalt

creae me vision of me states, which shalt createth me

critical enthusiasm, in me counties, which beturns into me

audience for me author, whose book beeth me recitation by

which me memory silently readeth; me puns of me city

names beometh me process. Me giveth to me author me

forgetfulness.


287/370

287

(V.) Me Josephs covenant or me covenant between beings

on me level of me Joseph leadeth to me metabeyond-

unbelief. He hath run out of doubt.


288/370


289/370

289

(X.) Me seeth me chart. Me seeth me waste.


290/370


291/370


292/370


293/370

293

(BB.) Me readings beeth me activities. However, it doth

nary taketh any action to readeth.


294/370

294

(CC.) Me studying of me matrixes beeth me readings one

and thrice-three.


295/370

295

(DD.) Me laws of me supply and me demand govern me

readings where me writ may beeth considered as me

breaking of me vessels. There beeth nary plot to me writ.


296/370

296

(EE.) Since me writ requireth me patience, so doth reading

if both beeth to complimenteth each other. Me books beeth

usually of difficulty to readeth. But, me memories beeth

different betwixt different experiences of different authored

books as thou readest them. Experiences beeth universal to

us.


297/370


298/370

298

(GG.) Who doth me readeth when me want to write me

poem?


299/370

299

(HH.) Me literature canst beeth seen as me potential

literature. However, tis this kind of literature which goest

nowhere.


300/370

300

(II.) Me book shalt maketh me poem one way, or me

memory me narrative in nother way.


301/370

301

(JJ.) Whyfor writeth, rewriteth? To reviseth.


302/370

302

(KK.) To readeth better! Me reading yet devestateth. We

beeth to maketh more friends. Yet, we maketh nary.


303/370

303

52.

(A.) Me Jacob beeth me patriarch as here who explaineth

me system. Me Jacob?


304/370

304

(B.) Tis this which meaneth that me system must nary

beeth active to understandeth it; it must beeth frozen in me

time. Tis this beeth nary me system.


305/370

305

(C.) Me Jacobs system nary beeth me calculus, or if tis, tis

nary confused with me movement which he studieth. Me

other alternatives doth not considereth me possibility of me

reference to something more of me definitive.


306/370

306

(D.) Me Jacob beeth nary me Isaac, beeth therefore nary

interested in me changing, but howfor me change changeth.

Nothing remaineth me same.


307/370

307

(E.) Thus, me Jacob beeth regular.


308/370

308

(F.) Me Jacob doth not improviseth upon me ideas before

him in one way, but he doth describe them, and yet tis me

description which beeth me improvisation that advanceth

but nary beeth in completion. To addeth beeth one way

nary to describeth.


309/370

309

53.

(A.) Instead of being me system, me descriptions, or me

ideas after me Isaacs, they beeth seen as me knowing of

me system. Me reality beeth nary known.


310/370


311/370

311

(C.) If me system doth nary have any parts then it couldst

beeth described by me Jacob. Me hypothetical questions

maketh me progress to ocureth or to beeth understood.


312/370

312

(D.) In other words me system beeth me synthetic

construction which hath me life, which means that it hath

me mortality like any other vocabulary. What beeth it to

mean something?


313/370

313

(E.) To recognizeth and to accepteth it beeth to seeth

howfor without it there couldst beeth nary description

because there beeth little time for it. Howfor beeth me idea

of me non-explaination conveyed?


314/370

314

(F.) And, as me vocabularies beeth mortal, me descriptive

and me prescriptive, thus so beeth me patriarchs; and, me

Josephs and me Davids concretic garden beeth illusionary

unless thou beeth in agreement that it canst beeth saved

from me time by me ongoing process of me active

meditation. Me patriarchs beeth real.


315/370

315

54.

(A.) To categorizeth any subject beeth possible. Howfor

dost me categorize?


316/370

316

(B.) Me David and me Joseph categorizeth me vocabulary

into me language that beeth exclusive, but this beeth

because that language beeth concretical and technical. All

me semblances beeth fuzzy and nary visual in me Nature.


317/370

317

(C.) Me David, me Joseph beeth of me genre, but though it

appeared as if it beeth pastorical, satirical, tis more of me

natural solitude to beeth romantic. Me countryside beeth

for those who beeth single and of me literal.


318/370

318

(D.) Me gardening, being romantic, beeth me metaphor,

and on that level it proceedeth me tragically, meaning me

antithesis beeth romantical. Me gardening

beaccomplisheth very little.


319/370

319

(E.) What befollows beeth that after me tragical stage of

me Jacobs, two opposing beromanticals in genre followeth

- formeth and fusioneth. Formeth beeth one.


320/370

320

(F.) Me formula beeth that of me satirical agreement to

comically musheth me romantical mapping with me

tragical in opposition to me romantical form with me meta-

romantical fusion. Everybody liketh this formula.


321/370

321

55.

(A.) Me Abrahams style befocuseth on me trendy

movement like me Isaacs. What beeth me trend?


322/370

322

(B.) Me difference twixt me Abrahams style and me

Isaacs beeth that one nary of mensuration, which they both

useth, but of me mapping. Me difference beeth always

what one thinketh it beeth.


323/370

323

(C.) Me Isaac mapeth and reviseth me trends of me

Avraham. To mapeth beeth to geveth something away so

that thou doeth nary to hath it anymore.


324/370

324

(D.) To reviseth by me mapping beeth to taketh me stylistic

step which eliminateth me efforts of me rain process and

me evaporation process, of which both beeth humorous, to

maketh it beeth lighter. Only one thing maketh me to

laugheth.


325/370

325

(E.) Me mapping for me Isaac beeth nary analytical. Me

mapping existeth.


326/370

326

(F.) Me romanticism of me Isaac beeth me lightest of all

toeth render stylistically of all me stages; this beeth

because me map beeth me model rather than me actuality,

as in this case me model beeth nary me representative, but

me skeletonical structural.


327/370

327

56.

(A.) Me indexing helpeth to connect me Jacobs stages by

me themes. What beeth and howfor dost thou indexeth?


328/370

328

(B.) is this connecting which showed me relationships

twixt similar ideas in order to maketh up me more

advanced antithetical style of contrasting them in me

future. Canst anything looketh like nother?


329/370

329

(C.) To useth me similar ideas beeth to relate, in one case,

me genres as similar though me styles beeth as in

opposition. To relate beeth nary me practice.


330/370

330

(D.) By focusing on me romantical me idea of me

imagination beeth actually coming me possible. What tis

and howfor dost me maketh me idea?


331/370

331

(E.) Me romantical diversity beeth possible only through

me ability to changeth, within romantical styles, to vary me

balances.


332/370

332

(F.) Me well-balanced twice-three patriarchal system beeth

me goal of me writ and me using of me different stylistic

personalities. Me six beeth nary me stabilized number.


333/370

333

57.

(A.) Me personality of me Michael beeth bedensed and

besimpled. Me personality usually beeth lighter.


334/370

334

(B.) Me personality of me Abram beeth revisionary and

bereductive. Me personalities beeth nary existant.


335/370

335

(C.) Me personality of me Isaac beeth light and

meaningful. Me personalities beeth heavy in usual.


336/370

336

(D.) Me personality of me Jacob beeth pensive and

befinited. Me idea of me thought beeth me idea which

standeth alone.


337/370

337

(E.) Me personality of me Joseph beeth befitted and

beuncomfortable. Me personalities beeth incompatibles.


338/370

338

(F.) Me personality of me David beeth poetic and

beblessed. What tis me poetical?


339/370

339

58.

(A.) What beeth me style if nary me way of me expressive

or me descriptive? Me style neither beeth relative nor

beeth in question.


340/370

340

(B.) Me museai canst beeth changed into me patriarchs

and beeth changed into me last stage of me Abram. To

changeth beeth me usual story.


341/370

341

(C.) Me fusion-stage of me Abraham, tis what beeth me

meta-romantical stage and style. What beeth me fusion and

how doth it beoccur?


342/370

342

(D.) To fuseth beeth to blendeth beeth to taketh me dual

mensurations thrice and bemix them. To fuseth beeth doeth

nothing.


343/370

343

(E.) Whyfor revise me Isaac by me mixing me expansions

of me Jacob? Whyeth not?


344/370

344

(F.) And, behonestly, whyst this me berevision? Whyst me

beest honest?


345/370

345

59.

(A.) Me fusion beeth called me revisional, but tis me

double revisional. Me idea of me fusion canst nary beeth

tinkereth with.


346/370

346

(B.) Me fusion reviseth both me Jacob and me Isaac. Me

befusion beeth only one thing.


347/370

347

(C.) Tis it, befusion, ahich changeth me tragical, me

science of me Jacob, and me romantical of the mapping of

me Isaac to maketh it me meta-descriptive-mapping. Me

change that occurs cometh before me event.


348/370

348

(D.) Me fusion reviseth me metonymic mapping, but also

reviseth me hyperbolic descriptive. Me befusion doeth

only one thing.


349/370

349

(E.) But because me hyperbolic descriptive beeth me

farther descendant from Abram, and because me mapping

beeth closer, being me Isaacs, me Abram beeth more

directly me influence. Who really beeth me Abraham?


350/370

350

(F.) Me fusion useth less light, but mostwards be blends, tis

almost me double mensuration, tis me Abrams triumph as

me father. Me mensuration canst nary be besplit into

twice-one concepts.


351/370

351

60.

(A.) Me mensuration beeth me way to extended me

sentence. What beeth me mensuration?


352/370

352

(B.) Me rian method, me mensurations opposite, beeth me

way to expresseth me personality. What beeth me way?


353/370

353

(C.) Me narration beeth me way to describeth me process.

Me narration beeth nary something which followed me

method.


354/370

354

(D.) And, me Psalmic processes changeth me vocabulary of

me sentence. Me Psalm doth nary change.


355/370

355

(E.) Thus, there beeth twice-twice-one way to maketh me

sentence. Twice-twice-one beeth an indefinate number.


356/370

356

(F.) Me other styles in me vocabularies beeth just me

variations of these twice-twice-one. Me variations beeth

exciting.


357/370

357

61.

(A.) Me twice-three beeth me number which beeth

important to beunderstand. What difference dost it make,

twice-three?


358/370

358

(B.) Twice-three beeth possible to divide twice-three times,

twice, thrice, et caetera. Me twice-three beeth nary me

twice.


359/370

359

(C.) Me six beeth me number of the days of creation, but

four beeth the Zoas of William Blake. Me Six beeth nary

me four.


360/370

360

(D.) Perhaps, me number four, me number of me sentence

types, nary styles, useth in me sixty-two vocabularies, tis a

number good for defining genres. Tis good to beeth more

certain of this?


361/370

361

(E.) Me four genres and some of me sentence types beeth:

satire-rain, comedy-mensuration-rain, romance-

mensuration-description of me kind of bemapping, me

Psalmic-mensuration, me mensuration, and me plain

descriptive-double descriptive, being me fusionary. Me

comical beeth always me exciting genre.


362/370

362

(F.) There beeth only twice-one plain types of style; and,

there beeth four combo-types of styles, therefore. Me

twice-one beeth nary me twice-two.


363/370

363

62.

(A.) Whyfor combineth me styles? Whyfor not?


364/370

364

(B.) And, why for must me styles followed me order of me

combonation or nary as they doeth? Whyfor art there beeth

nary other way?


365/370

365

(C.) Me reason for me patriarchal order beeth natural, me

natural revisional process. Tis natural to remaineth the

same.


366/370

366

(D.) To haveth me good poem and meditation me complete

process in that order of styles beeth necessary. To beeth

complete beeth me disaster of me formlessness.


367/370


368/370

368

(F.) Thus, me change and me loss beeth important themes

which me sixty-two vocabularies beeth in order. Me

change beeth nary me subject.


369/370

369

FINIS


370/370

Some Other Books by the McBrides

The Transcendence

Beauty and Progress

Happiness

Hawaiian Sonnets and Other Poems

Headbuttressia: a Fantasy

The Hydromancy of Jenny McBride

The Trouble with Being a Bnayvoovah

The Wonder and Love of M.O.A.T

M.O.A.T. Fundraising

Quotes from Beings

structure: how we made happiness

Documents