stroke care. what has been achieved so far and what still needs doing? tony rudd
TRANSCRIPT
Stroke Care. What has been achieved so far and what still needs
doing?Tony Rudd
St Thomas’ Hospital
“it is the duty of the physician to explain to the patient, or to his friends, that the condition is past relief, that medicines and electricity will do no good, and that there is no possible hope of cure”
William Osler
Evidence that stroke units save lives and reduce likelihood of disability•Reduced mortality (14%)•Reduced death or institutionalisation (18%)•Reduced death or dependency (18%)
What has changed since Oslers time?
Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration (2006)
Stroke unitStroke unit
The important components of a stroke unit
A skilled team including• Doctors• Nurses• Physiotherapists• Occupational Therapists• Speech and Language Therapists• Psychologists• Social Workers
• Direct admission from emergency department• Monitoring facilities for
• Heart Rate• Blood Pressure• Oxygen• Breathing Rate
• Multidisciplinary Working• Active involvement of patients and carers in care
A dedicated ward with:
• Ease of access to imaging. Every hospital treating stroke now has a CT scanner. 95% of patients scanned, 65% within 24 hours
• Quality of imaging– Differentiating between haemorrhage and
infarction– Identifying where the damage is and how big it is– Identifying when acute treatments to rescue brain
might work– Finding out why the stroke happened
Brain scanningBrain scanning
What has changed since Oslers time?
48444036322824201612840
Time from stroke to first brain scan (hours)
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Nu
mb
er
of
pa
tie
nts
Time from stroke to scan (Audit data 2008)
7531504921809 334635378332N =
Age group
85+75-8465-74<65
Bra
in S
can
With
in 2
4 H
ours
of S
trok
e
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Weekend
Weekday
Age and brain imaging
Brain scanNationally
Brain scan after stroke 98%
within 3 hours of stroke 27%
within 24 hours of stroke 70%
within 3 hours of admission 39%
within 24 hours of admission 84%
National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010
• Treating people early after a stroke improves outcome– Direct admission to an acute stroke unit– Treatment with thrombolysis can dramatically
improve outcome
Immediate treatmentImmediate treatment
What has changed since Oslers time?
Recognising the signs of stroke FAST
Risk of death, dependency and good functional outcome in randomized trials of rt-PA given
within 3 hours of acute ischaemic stroke
17.3
38.4
44.3
18.4
51.4
30.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
Thrombolysis Control
Alive andindependent
Alive butdependent
Dead
Differences/1000: 141 extra alive and independent (P<0.01)130 fewer dependent survivors (P<0.01)
12 fewer deaths (NS)Cochrane Library 2003
(3 trials, n=869)
Glenn D. Graham 2002
Observational studies: haemorrhage rates
Thrombolysis• 5% of patients received altepase in 2010
Sentinel Audit (increased from 1.8% in 2008)• 14% of patients satisfied the 3 criteria for
appropriateness of thrombolysis (presented within 3 hours, 80 yrs or under, infarction)
• Still many areas of the country where hyperacute stroke care not adequately provided
Duration of rehabilitation
• Research evidence to show a link between intensity of therapy after stroke and outcome
• In UK majority of rehabilitation resources concentrated in hospitals
• Length of hospital stay falling after stroke (reduced from mean of 35 days to 20 days over last 10 years)
• Patients frequently complain that they sit in hospital doing nothing for long periods of time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
total therapy physio-therapy occupational therapy speech therapy other therapies
time
(min
.)
Belgium
England
Switzerland
Germany
Appropriateness of 45 minutes of therapy
NUMBER OF WEEKDAYS 45 MIN WAS APPROPRIATE (i.e. patients with impairment and known days)
National
Median (IQR) in days
Physiotherapy 2 (0-7)
Occupational Therapy 2 (0-6)
Speech & Language Therapy 1 (0-3)
National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010
Amount of therapy received
Key MessageTherapy time should be spent delivering direct patient care and administrative work should be kept to a minimum
PHYSIOTHERAPY – provided on applicable days National45 min and above 32% Less than 20 min 33%
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY – provided on applicable days National45 min and above 31%Less than 20 min 42%
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY – provided on applicable days National
45 min and above 18%Less than 20 min 64%
National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010
How deliver increased intensity?
• Different patterns of working e.g. Cutting down on bureaucracy
• Less one to one therapy and more group treatment
• Using non specialist therapists to provide cover
• Focussing treatment just on patients likely to benefit e.g. Stopping treatment earlier
• More therapists
Delays stroke to admission
94% of patients were admitted within 24 hours of stroke
56% of patients were admitted within 3 hours of stroke
For 6354 patients for whom both times is known in hours
Inpatient Strokes5% of patients were already in hospital at time of strokePerformance on several of the 9 key indicators is worse for patients who have a stroke while an inpatient
Key Indicators Already an Inpatient
Admitted after stroke
90% of stay in SU 51% 72%
Screened for swallowing disorders within 24 hrs of admission 72% 83%
Brain scan within 24 hrs of stroke 79% 70%
Aspirin within 48 hrs of stroke 92% 93%
PT assessment within 72 hours of admission 85% 92%
OT assessment within 4 working days of admission 69% 84%
Weighed during admission 91% 85%
Mood assessed by discharge 81% 80%
Rehab goals agreed by MDT 66% 79%
Location to which patient was initially admitted
NationalAdmissions / Medical Assessment Unit / Clinical Decisions Unit 57%
Coronary care unit 1%
Intensive Care Unit / High Dependency Unit 1%
Acute / Combined Stroke Unit 36%Other Ward 4%
Key MessageAll patients should be directly admitted to a stroke unit equipped to manage acute stroke patients
•Outcomes
•Care Planning
Rehabilitation goals
STANDARDNational
Written evidence that rehabilitation goals agreed by multidisciplinary team within 5 days of admission 78
Written evidence that rehabilitation goals agreed by multidisciplinary team by discharge 94
Patient was receiving nutrition within 72 hours of admission (Domain 4) 95
Nutrition
Continence
20% of patients had a urinary catheter in the first week of admission
In 10% of these cases no clear rationale for the insertion is documented
Only 63% of incontinent patients have a plan to promote urinary continence (Domain 4)
Key MessageAll patients with continence should have a documented plan with evidence that it has been implemented in their case notes
Planning for discharge
STANDARDNational My site
Of applicable patients
Follow up appointment with a member of stroke team at approximately 6 weeks post discharge (Domain 5)
74% %
Discharge organised involving use of an early supported discharge scheme 36% %
Rehabilitation planned before discharge 83% %
Key MessageStroke specialist early supported discharge teams should be made available in all districts
•Medication and secondary prevention
Pre-admission
81% of patients admitted with stroke have a history of known vascular risk factors
Only 27% of patients who had atrial fibrillation prior to stroke were taking warfarin on admission
Key MessageAll patients with ischaemic stroke in AF should be considered for anticoagulation and a clear reason documented where a decision is made not to treat
Anti-thrombotic Medication
89% of patients were prescribed any antithrombotic / antiplatelet at discharge
93% of patients were prescribed aspirin within 48 hours of stroke (Key Indicator/Domain 6)
39% of patients in whom AF has been identified as a co-mordidity were on warfarin by discharge or planned to start it
(Target of 60% set by DH in England as part of Accelerated Stroke Improvement metrics to be achieved by April 2011)
At discharge
Lipid regulating agents
81% of patients prescribed any lipid lowering agent
80% of these patients were prescribed statins
Anti-hypertensive Medication
68% of all stroke patients were prescribed blood pressure lowering medication
84% of patients in whom hypertension was a co-morbidity were discharged with antihypertensive medication
These rates have reduced since 2008
•The London Model
Prophets of doom predictions
• Not possible to implement major system reorganisation in London for a condition as complex as stroke
• Staffing requirements unachievable– Recruitment – where will staff come from?– Training – how will staff develop the necessary skills?– Leadership – who can provide the necessary leadership? – There is a risk that the available workforce will be
consumed by early implementers, leaving later implementers unable to recruit to posts.
Prophets of doom predictions• Patients will not accept being taken to a hospital that is
not local to them• Not possible to transport people within 30 minutes to
a HASU• Repatriation will fail and HASUs will quickly become
full• Trusts will fight to the bitter end to retain services e.g.
Judicial review• Even if get acute services working it will fail because
impossible to change community services• Unsustainable
London stroke care: How is it working?
• In the latest round of the National Sentinel Audit of stroke care in England, Wales and Northern Ireland 5 of the 6 top performing hospitals were in London. All of the HASUs were in the top quartile of performance
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total Organisational Score 2010
Num
ber
of S
ites
London ScoresNational Scores
40
Performance data shows that London is performing better than all other SHAs in England
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
2009/10 2010/11
% a
chie
vem
ent
London
England
Target
Thrombolysis rates have increased since implementation began to a
rate higher than that reported for any large city elsewhere in the
world
% of patients spending 90% of their time on a dedicated stroke unit
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
2009/10 2010/11
% a
ch
iev
em
en
tLondon
England
Target
% of TIA patients’ treatment initiated within 24 hours
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
12%10%
3.5%
Feb – Jul 2009 Feb – Jul 2010AIM
41
Efficiency gains are also beginning to be seen
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
2009/10 2010/11
Average length of stay HASU destination on discharge
• The average length of stay has fallen from approximately 15 days in 2009/10 to approximately 11.5 days in 20010/11 YTD
• This represents a potential saving of approximately [DN - insert figure]
• Approximately 35% of patients are discharged home from a HASU. The estimate at the beginning of the project was 20%.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Home Other Stroke Unit RIP (blank)
London Stroke Care: How is it working?
• No significant problems with repatriation to SUs. Good exchange of patient information.
• Significantly improved quality of care in SUs• Evidence of constructive collaboration
between hospitals– SU Consultants joining HASU rotas and
participating in post-take rounds and educational meetings
• Very positive anecdotal patient feedback
Workforce initiatives
• 1 month intensive training for consultants on HASU rota
• 6 month fast track training post CCST• E learning programme in development• Simulation centre courses funded and being
developed– Senior doctors and nurses– Band 5 nurses and junior doctors
Evaluation
• Collecting data to prove the model is worth it– SINAP– Additional London data items– Patient and carer perception– Health economics: funded through SHA– SDO funding to evaluate process of change (PI
Naomi Fulop) – SHA funding health economic evaluation
Areas where issues remain
• Acute stroke patients presenting at non HASU A&E departments– Too many– Some difficulties transferring to HASU– Concerns by some SUs that inappropriate to
transfer to HASU and not in patients interest to move
• Out of London patients being brought by ambulance to non HASU A&E departments
Areas where issues remain
• Community services in many areas still insufficient– Early supported discharge– Longer term rehabilitation– Vocational rehabilitation
• Commissioning guidance for rehabilitation and longer term care
Areas where issues remain
• Outcomes framework– Need to collect real outcome data that is robust
and interpretable by the public– Public data to be displayed by London Health
Observatory
What does the future hold?
• Can the enhanced tariff be sustained?• How will Clinical Commissioning affect the
London stroke model?• How will Clinical Commissioning affect similar
projects elsewhere in England – concerns expressed by Kings Fund?
• Will the Secretary of State seek to open up the market for stroke care in London?