strengthening the civic roles and social responsibilities of

STRENGTHENING THE CIVIC ROLES AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHER EDUCATION

TA L L O I R E S

N E T WO R K

The Talloires Conference 2005

Building a Global Network

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page FC3

STRENGTHENING THE CIVIC ROLES AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Building a Global Network

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page IC2

A R E PORT ON TH E TALLOI R E S CON FE R E NCE 2005

Hosted by Tu f ts Un ivers i t y

Co-Sponsors

The Association of Commonwealth Universities

Campus Compact

The Inter-American Organization for Higher Education

The International Consortium for Higher Education,

Civic Responsibility, and Democracy

FundersOmidyar Network

Carnegie Corporation of New York

Ford Foundation

Breidenthal-Snyder Foundation

Lowell-Blake and Associates

Charles F. Adams Trust

OrganizationJonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service, Tufts University1

in collaboration with Innovations in Civic Participation

Report WriterHelene Perold

Helene Perold & Associates

1 Tufts’ University College of Citizenship and Public Service was renamed the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship

and Public Service on May 12, 2006

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 1

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 2

Conference Attendees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Introductory Remarks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

Lawrence S. BacowPresident, Tufts University

The Talloires Declaration on the Civic Roles and Social Responsibilitiesof Higher Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

The Talloires Declarations Over the Years

Shaping the Talloires Declaration on theCivic Roles and Social Responsibilitiesof Higher Education

Civic Engagement: A Global Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

Robert M. HollisterDean, Jonathan M. Tisch College ofCitizenship and Public Service, Tufts University

Civic Engagement: Public Policy and Higher Education— A Call to Action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Alison BernsteinVice President for Knowledge, Creativity and Freedom,Ford Foundation

Placing Civic Engagement at the Center of Higher Education . . . . . 34

Organizing the University for Civic Engagement

Research and Scholarship

Government Policy and Resources

Directions for Action: Establishing a Global Network . . . . . . . . . . . 42

Iqbal ParooPresident and Chief Operating Officer,Omidyar Network

The Talloires Network . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Mission and Opportunities to Participate

C CO O

N NT TE E

N NT TS S

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 3

CCOONNFFEERREENNCCEE AATTTTEENNDDEEEESS

4 T A L L O I R E S C O N F E R E N C E 2 0 0 5 A N D T H E L A U N C H O F T H E T A L L O I R E S N E T W O R K

President Gustavo Alvim Methodist University of PiracicabaBrazil

President David Arnold American University in CairoEgypt

Rector Azyumardi Azra Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic UniversityIndonesia

President Lawrence S. Bacow Tufts UniversityUnited States of America

President Gasim Badri Ahfad University for Women Sudan

Interim Vice-Chancellor Marcus BalintuloCape Peninsula University of TechnologySouth Africa

President Aaron Ben-Ze’evUniversity of HaifaIsrael

President Crispin P. Betita Notre Dame of Marbel UniversityPhilippines

Vice Chancellor Kerry Cox University of BallaratAustralia

Vice Chancellor Julian Crampton University of BrightonUnited Kingdom

President John J. DeGioia Georgetown University United States of America

Presidential Attendees

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 4

S T R E N G T H E N I N G T H E C I V I C R O L E S A N D S O C I A L R E S P O N S I B I L I T I E S O F H I G H E R E D U C A T I O N 5

President Emeritus John DiBiaggio Tufts UniversityUnited States of America

Rector Silvio Israel Feldman National University of General SarmientoArgentina

President Roderick Floud London Metropolitan University United Kingdom

President Mark Gearan Hobart and William Smith Colleges United States of America

Vice Chancellor Brenda Gourley The Open UniversityUnited Kingdom

Former President Sung-Joo Han Korea UniversitySouth Korea

PresidentMonica Jiménez de la JaraCatholic University of TemucoChile

Vice Chancellor John KaburiseUniversity for Development StudiesGhana

President Shamsh Kassim-LakhaAga Khan UniversityPakistan

Vice Chancellor Mathew L. LuhangaUniversity of Dar es SalaamTanzania

Rector Radmila Marinkovic-NeducinUniversity of Novi SadSerbia and Montenegro

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 5

CCOONNFFEERREENNCCEE AATTTTEENNDDEEEESS

President José Ignacio Moreno LeónMetropolitan University at CaracasVenezuela

President Sari NusseibehAl-Quds UniversityPalestine

Vice Chancellor Janice ReidUniversity of Western SydneyAustralia

Vice Chancellor Rupa Shah SNDT Women’s University ofMumbaiIndia

Vice Rector Bruno SionSaint-Joseph UniversityLebanon

Rector Juan Vela Valdés University of HavanaCuba

President Vo-Tong XuanAn Giang UniversityVietnam

Alison Bernstein, Vice PresidentFord FoundationUnited States of America

Tom Ehrlich, Senior ScholarCarnegie Foundation for theAdvancement of TeachingUnited States of America

Robert M. Hollister, DeanJonathan M. Tisch College ofCitizenship and Public ServiceTufts University United States of America

Iqbal Paroo, President and Chief Operating OfficerOmidyar NetworkUnited States of America

Specialists and Speakers


87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 6

Susan StroudExecutive Director Innovations in Civic ParticipationUnited States of America

Judith Torney-Purta, ProfessorUniversity of MarylandUnited States of America

Liz Hollander, Executive DirectorCampus CompactUnited States of America

John Rowett, Secretary GeneralAssociation of CommonwealthUniversitiesUnited Kingdom

José Ignacio Moreno LeónInter-American Organization forHigher EducationCanada

Kathleen DunnSpecial Projects AssociateTufts UniversityUnited States of America

Gabriella Goldstein, Director Tufts University European CenterFrance

Grace HollisterProgram AssistantInnovations in Civic ParticipationUnited States of America

Judy Olson, Chief of StaffOffice of the PresidentTufts UniversityUnited States of America

Helene PeroldRapporteur and Report WriterHelene Perold & AssociatesSouth Africa

Paul TringaleDirector of Conferences andSummer ProgramsTufts UniversityUnited States of America

Representatives of Co-sponsoring Organizations

Staff


87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 7

C8 T A L L O I R E S C O N F E R E N C E 2 0 0 5 A N D T H E L A U N C H O F T H E T A L L O I R E S N E T W O R K

University civic engagement is a burgeoning movement that is rapidly reach-

ing significant scale in both volume of activity and extent of impact, a scale far

greater than is commonly understood even within the academic community.

The movement focuses on educating responsible citizens and community

leaders, and on mobilizing university resources to accelerate social and com-

munity development.

The Talloires Conference 2005 united and energized key leaders in this growing

phenomenon. During three days of enthusiastic dialogue, conference participants

exchanged information about work-in-progress at their individual institutions and

shared their ambitious plans for the future. They debated how to tap the vast

potential for social participation by the almost 100 million college and university

students worldwide—a number that is expected to double by 2025. They reviewed

alternative strategies and identified ways to work together in the years ahead.

This group of university leaders discussed critical questions facing the civic

engagement movement. How to create and sustain the institutional frameworks

TTHHEE TTAALLLLOOIIRREESS CCOONNFFEERREENNCCEE 22000055

Convened by Tufts University President Lawrence S. Bacow,

the Talloires Conference 2005 was the first international gath-

ering of the heads of universities devoted to strengthening

the civic roles and social responsibilities of higher educa-

tion. Held in Talloires, France, on September 15-17, 2005,

the meeting brought together 29 university presidents, rectors,

and vice chancellors from 23 countries.

Executive Summary

“Our academic modelsupports the social

commitment and civil engagement of the university based

on promotion of socialcapital values.”

José Ignacio Moreno LeónMetropolitan University at Caracas

Venezuela

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 8


and university-community partnerships that encourage and recognize good

practice in social service by students, faculty, staff and their community partners

was a key theme of the discussions. They agreed on the importance of strength-

ening incentives to encourage faculty participation in civic engagement. They

advocated developing national policies that will reinforce the ability of universi-

ties to make civic engagement a priority in their research and scholarship.

By exchanging best practices and strategizing about common challenges,

Talloires Conference participants sharpened their own plans and forged a con-

sensus vision for the expanding international civic engagement movement of

higher education.

TH E TALLOI R E S DECLARATION

AN D G LOBAL N ETWOR K

At the conclusion of the Conference, participants signed The Talloires

Declaration on the Civic Roles and Social Responsibilities of Higher Education,

affirming their belief that all higher education institutions “bear a special obliga-

tion to contribute to the public good through educating students, expanding

access to education, and the creation and timely application of new knowledge.”

The Declaration states that higher education institutions have the responsibility

to serve and strengthen the society of which they are part. Through research and

scholarship, and the commitment of faculty, staff, and students, institutions are

better placed to “create social capital, preparing students to contribute positively

to local, national, and global communities.”

The group also established the Talloires Network, an international collective

of individuals and institutions committed to achieving the goals outlined in the

Declaration. The Network is open to all and can be easily accessed through its

website at: http://www.tufts.edu/talloiresnetwork. Those who are interested in

signing the Talloires Declaration or participating in this movement are encour-

aged to join this group in strengthening the civic roles and social responsibilities

of higher education around the world.

“When I started at my university, I was askedwhether I subscribed tothe Talloires Declarationon EnvironmentalSustainability. I didn’tknow what it was, but I soon found out andtoday we do.”

Janice ReidUniversity of Western SydneyAustralia

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 9

W10 T A L L O I R E S C O N F E R E N C E 2 0 0 5 A N D T H E L A U N C H O F T H E T A L L O I R E S N E T W O R K

Lawrence S. Bacow President, Tufts University, United States of America

IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTOORRYY RREEMMAARRKKSS

Welcome to the Talloires Conference on the civic engagement

roles and responsibilities of higher education. Thank you for par-

ticipating in this historic first international gathering of the

heads of universities from around the world on this topic.

This fourth Talloires Conference continues a Tufts tradition of convening uni-

versity leaders at the Tufts University European Center to address challenges

of global significance. Each session examined opportunities to strengthen the

role of institutions of higher education with respect to a pressing issue facing

society. Previous Talloires Conferences have focused on Freedom of

Expression (1981), Challenges of the Nuclear Age (1988), and Environmental

Sustainability (1990). Each of these gatherings issued a Talloires Declaration

that communicated recommendations about future university roles on the

topic. These Declarations have been powerfully influential consensus visions

for change.

Today we have a similar opportunity with respect to the civic engagement roles

and social responsibilities of universities in all parts of the globe. Over the next

three days we will share information about our current efforts to educate future

generations of community leaders and to mobilize the resources of our institutions

to strengthen social and community development. We also will compare notes

about our respective policies and practices—debating the effectiveness of alterna-

tive strategies.

Our topic of civic engagement could not be more timely. As the higher edu-

cation sector continues to expand dramatically around the world, the societal

needs which our civic engagement activities address are increasing in equal if

not greater measure. This means we can anticipate increased pressure on our

institutions to apply their resources to these needs. In addition, the civic

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 10


engagement movement is showing the potential to approach critical mass; it

is no longer isolated from the central mission of universities. Furthermore,

there is increasing awareness of the effectiveness of civic work as the evidence

of educational outcomes and community benefit mounts up. Together these

factors represent an extraordinary opportunity for higher education to lever-

age its resources in order to build much-needed social capital in our respec-

tive societies.

In preparation for this historic conference each of you has provided extensive

information about the civic activities of your university—how you define civic

engagement, what programs you support, how these programs are organized,

their scale and impacts, what challenges these efforts encounter and how you are

addressing these obstacles, how your civic functions are funded, and finally your

future plans and your interest in collaboration with other universities going for-

ward. We have a unique chance to build upon this preparatory information to

advance our common knowledge about each of these questions. Then, our ulti-

mate opportunity will be to develop recommendations about the future civic

engagement activities of higher education in all parts of the world.

Scholarly institutions are among some of the oldest institutions in our

societies; while governments may come and go, universities and colleges

remain. Therefore, universities bear special responsibilities for educating citi-

zens in their role in civil society. We need to set an example through our

actions, not only through our teaching and scholarship, but by how we live

our own lives for others.

During our next three days together we can learn from each other and cre-

ate new ideas and approaches. Our great diversity can stimulate both mutual

learning and help us to develop new ways to support one another. We hope that

multiple relationships will emerge from this dialogue, as well as the beginning

of an ongoing network, a web of relationships that we can use for continuing

action and joint action. We will aim to articulate a Declaration to guide both

our individual and collective efforts, a Declaration which twenty years from

now can serve as a benchmark for university-based civic engagement.

“As the higher educa-tion sector continues to expand dramaticallyaround the world, thesocietal needs whichour civic engagementactivities address areincreasing in equal ifnot greater measure.”

Lawrence S. Bacow Tufts UniversityUnited States of America

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 11


In this century of change, we note with optimism that

access to university education is increasing, that one-

half of the students enrolled in institutions of higher

education live in developing nations, and that the

number of university students worldwide is expected

to double between 2000 and 2025. The potential for

social participation by students young and old, now and

in the years to come, is massive. The extent to which

this potential can be realized will depend on universities

worldwide mobilizing students, faculty, staff, and citizens

in programs of mutual benefit.

We are dedicated to strengthening the civic role and

social responsibility of our institutions. We pledge to

promote shared and universal human values, and the

engagement by our institutions within our communities

and with our global neighbors. We urge the one hundred

million university students, and the many millions of

faculty, staff, alumni, and members of governing bodies

throughout the world to join us in these initiatives.

We believe that higher education institutions exist to serve

and strengthen the society of which they are part. Through

the learning, values, and commitment of faculty, staff, and

students, our institutions create social capital, preparing

students to contribute positively to local, national, and

global communities. Universities have the responsibility to

foster in faculty, staff, and students a sense of social

responsibility and a commitment to the social good, which,

we believe, is central to the success of a democratic and

just society.

Some of our universities and colleges are older than

the nations in which they are located; others are young

and emerging; but all bear a special obligation to con-

tribute to the public good, through educating students,

expanding access to education, and the creation and

timely application of new knowledge. Our institutions

recognize that we do not exist in isolation from society,

nor from the communities in which we are located.

Instead, we carry a unique obligation to listen, under-

stand, and contribute to social transformation and

development. Higher education must extend itself for

the good of society to embrace communities near and

far. In doing so, we will promote our core missions of

teaching, research, and service.

The university should use the processes of education

and research to respond to, serve, and strengthen its

communities for local and global citizenship. The univer-

sity has a responsibility to participate actively in the

democratic process and to empower those who are less

privileged. Our institutions must strive to build a culture

of reflection and action by faculty, staff, and students

that infuses all learning and inquiry.

TTHHEE TTAALLLLOOIIRREESS DDEECCLLAARRAATTIIOONN ON THE CIVIC ROLES AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF HIGHER EDUCATION

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 12

THEREFORE, WE AGREE TO:

• Expand civic engagement and social responsibility

programs in an ethical manner, through teaching,

research, and public service.

• Embed public responsibility through personal

example and the policies and practices of our

higher education institutions.

• Create institutional frameworks for the encourage-

ment, reward, and recognition of good practice in

social service by students, faculty, staff, and their

community partners.

• Ensure that the standards of excellence, critical

debate, scholarly research, and peer judgment are

applied as rigorously to community engagement as

they are to other forms of university endeavor.

• Foster partnerships between universities and

communities to enhance economic opportunity,

empower individuals and groups, increase mutual

understanding, and strengthen the relevance,

reach, and responsiveness of university education

and research.

• Raise awareness within government, business,

media, charitable, not-for-profit and international

organizations about contributions of higher educa-

tion to social advancement and wellbeing.

Specifically, establish partnerships with government

to strengthen policies that support higher educa-

tion’s civic and socially responsible efforts.

Collaborate with other sectors in order to magnify

impacts and sustain social and economic gains for

our communities.

• Establish partnerships with primary and secondary

schools, and other institutions of further and higher

education, so that education for active citizenship

becomes an integral part of learning at all levels of

society and stages of life.

• Document and disseminate examples of university

work that benefit communities and the lives of

their members.

• Support and encourage international, regional, and

national academic associations in their efforts to

strengthen university civic engagement efforts and

create scholarly recognition of service and action

in teaching and research.

• Speak out on issues of civic importance in our

communities.

• Establish a steering committee and international net-

works of higher education institutions to inform and

support all their efforts to carry out this Declaration.

We commit ourselves to the civic engagement of our

institutions and to that end we establish the Talloires

Network, with an open electronic space for the

exchange of ideas and understandings and for foster-

ing collective action.

We invite others to join in this Declaration and to

collaborate in our civic work.

Adopted on September 17, 2005, by the Talloires Conference participants.


87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 13


TH E TALLOI R E S DECLARATION S

The Talloires Declaration on Civic Engagement is the fourth in a series of declarations

made since 1981 by university leaders who came together at the Tufts University

European Center in the village of Talloires, France, to address issues of global signifi-

cance. The Declarations have catalyzed institutions of higher education to strengthen

action on challenges facing society.

1981 Freedom of ExpressionThe first declaration titled “A Constructive Approach to a Global Information

Order” was signed by 63 delegates on 17 May 1981. It emerged from a two-day

conference called “Voices of Freedom” that was organized by Tufts University in

cooperation with the World Press Freedom Committee. Motivated in large meas-

ure by attempts to curb media freedom, leaders expressed their deep concern

about “a growing tendency in many countries and international bodies to put

government interests above those of the individual, particularly in regard to infor-

mation” and pledged to expand the free flow of information worldwide.

1988 Challenges of the Nuclear AgeThe 1988 Declaration is titled “The Responsibility of Universities in the Nuclear

Age.” It held that in an environment plagued by war, hunger, injustice, and suffer-

ing, universities have a fundamental responsibility to increase understanding of

the risks of the nuclear age. Planned and initiated by the presidents of Tufts

University and Tokai University (Japan), and attended by 45 university presi-

dents, the conference affirmed the university leaders’ commitment to supporting

“research and teaching programs of peace and conflict issues with special

emphasis on disarmament, negotiation, and conflict resolution.”

1990 Environmental SustainabilityIn 1990 an international conference on "The Role of Universities in

Environmental Management and Sustainable Development” produced the first

official statement made by university leaders on the issue of environmental sus-

tainability. Initially signed by 22 university leaders, subsequently the Declaration

has been signed by 300 heads of higher education institutions. It includes a ten-

point action plan for incorporating environmental literacy and sustainability in

university teaching and practice. It declares that universities have a major role in

the education, research, policy formation, and information exchange necessary

“to address the unprecedented scale and speed of environmental pollution and

degradation, and the depletion of natural resources.”

“There is a range ofuniversities, like mine,that must be included

in this Declaration.Distance education students are vast in

number, are not tied toa university location,

and are likely to spanall age groups. Their

life experience andwork experience meansthey have much to shareand much to contribute

to the communityengagement agenda.”

Brenda GourleyThe Open University

United Kingdom

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 14


“It is very refreshingand welcome to havesuch an inspirationaldocument that talksabout doing good. We are helping our students, learning from them, developingthem, and it is an integrated partnershipprocess rather than aone-way process.”

Sir Roderick FloudLondon Metropolitan UniversityUnited Kingdom

2005 Civic and Social Engagement

The 2005 Talloires Conference, attended by 29 university leaders, produced the

“Talloires Declaration on the Civic Roles and Social Responsibilities of Higher

Education.” The universities present affirmed their belief that all higher education

institutions “bear a special obligation to contribute to the public good, through

educating students, expanding access to education, and the creation and timely

application of new knowledge.” The Declaration states that higher education

institutions have the responsibility to serve and strengthen the society of which

they are part. Through research and scholarship, and the commitment of faculty,

staff, and students, institutions are better placed to “create social capital, prepar-

ing students to contribute positively to local, national, and global communities.”

Shaping the Talloires Declaration on the civic roles and socialresponsibilities of higher educationLeading the drafting of the Declaration, Tom Ehrlich, senior scholar at Carnegie

Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, said that “a declaration is a con-

sensus document and needs to capture your comments as fully as possible. It is a

set of specific proposals that are broad enough to be widely applicable, but spe-

cific enough to have some traction for implementation.”

The goal of the Declaration is two-fold: to set high standards for the civic engage-

ment roles and social responsibilities of universities, and to set out specific propos-

als on how universities can increase the impact of their civic engagement activities.

Lawrence Bacow, president of Tufts University, stressed the need for the

Declaration to reflect the input of all the university leaders present. “We need to

be careful that this document not only reflects the understandings and vocabu-

lary we are using here, but that others also can understand and adopt it in their

own way. It must be accessible to colleagues elsewhere.”

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 15


URobert M. Hollister, Dean and Pierre and Pamela Omidyar Professor, Jonathan M. Tisch

College of Citizenship and Public Service, Tufts University, United States of America

AA GGLLOOBBAALL MMOOVVEEMMEENNTT

University civic engagement is today a real movement, a trend

that is taking off. It is a movement still in the early stages of

development, that is characterized by immense diversity, and

also by extraordinary vision and common approaches being

taken in very different contexts. This is the overarching message

that emerges from the preconference survey of civic engagement

among universities participating in the conference.

Civic Engagement

My presentation is based on responses by 25 universities from 24 countries

across five regions: Africa, Asia, Australia, North America, and South America.

The survey represents universities that are involved in civic engagement and

who agreed to participate in this Talloires discussion, and is thus not based on

a random sample.

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 16


The survey results indicate that civic engagement is reaching significant scale in

terms of volume of activity and extent of impact, a scale far greater than is com-

monly understood even within the academic community.

Although in some countries the environment is hostile towards universities

actively embracing civic engagement, the results show that in the long run the

obstacles are surmountable. University leaders could thus use the conference as a

launching pad to shape the future of civic engagement in their respective countries.

MAJOR TH E M E S

Seven themes emerge from the preconference survey. They define civic engage-

ment, its programmatic mix, how it is organized, the extent and impacts of these

activities, the challenges universities face, information about how the programs

are funded and future plans.

Civic engagement means educating citizens and creating social capitalCivic engagement has two key purposes: educating responsible citizens and com-

munity leaders, and contributing to social and community development.

Generally the participants emphasize efforts to alleviate poverty and improve

“Civic engagement isreaching significantscale in terms of volume of activity and extent of impact, a scale far greater thanis commonly under-stood even within theacademic community.”

Robert M. HollisterTufts University United States of America

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 17


“We should talk of students engaging

themselves for a lifelong commitment

to bettering the community. This could

be better defined interms of being

preventive rather thancurative; it should not

be enforced or be a weight for them.”

Rupa ShahSNDT

Women’s University of MumbaiIndia

public health. A great deal of activity focuses on building the capacity of nonstudent

groups such as the staff of nongovernmental organizations and local government

personnel. One of the university leaders from South America summed up civic

engagement: “Civic engagement in our institution is about the promotion of

democracy through the development of citizenship participation and social cap-

ital construction.”

What is driving the civic engagement of universities? While many respon-

dents cite values such as democracy, social justice, the struggle against

oppression, and academic excellence, the value of social responsibility is the

greatest influence.

Organizational structureUniversities have established a variety of organizational arrangements around

civic engagement. While over half the respondents have specific structures in

place to oversee this work, many of them do not have such structures in place.

The overall picture is one of the organizational structure that is in flux.

Motivated by the needs of societyOn the whole universities have adopted a demand-driven approach to their civic

engagement programs. Perhaps this point is obvious, but the universal reality is

that the pressing needs of societies shape these efforts.

Amazing scale and impactsContrary to the perception that universities have accorded civic engagement low

priority, a wide array of programs and projects undertaken by faculty and stu-

dents indicates high energy and enthusiasm for the drive for engagement. The

institutions demonstrate a diverse range of civic engagement initiatives, some of

which have been fully integrated with curricula.

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 18


The percentage of students participating in civic engagement and the percent-

age of faculty participating are far greater than one would assume. This impressive

scale presents an opportunity to build awareness of and support for the global

civic engagement movement.

Many of these university leaders report over 50 percent of students par-

ticipating in civic engagement activities. Some register extraordinary levels

of civic activity at over 75 percent of students, including Ahfad University

for Women in Sudan, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University in

Indonesia, the University for Development Studies in Ghana, the University

of Havana in Cuba, and the University of Western Sydney in Australia. This

results in substantial levels of impact on students—their attitudes and

skills—on communities and on institutions, partnerships, funding opportu-

nities, and relationships with other sectors.

Limited funding and government policySeveral institutions cited resource constraints and the lack of a supportive national

policy as some of the impediments to their success. Approximately 70 percent of

the institutions mention the absence of government support. Nevertheless there

are a number of positive examples of governments facilitating civic work. They note

that lack of funds experienced by most universities impedes adequate investment in

civic engagement programs. Many participants agree that faculty incentives are an

important factor in driving civic engagement.

Optimistic visions for the future and for collaborationIt is encouraging to see the high level of ambition in the universities’ plans for

civic engagement. The participating university leaders have a great opportunity to

expand and improve what their institutions already are doing, and to strengthen

university-community partnerships. The power of collaboration is clearly a signif-

icant element. There is a high interest in collaborating with other universities by sup-

porting and learning from one another.

“The engagementbetween university and community—mutuallearning—should be a central theme.”

Julian CramptonUniversity of BrightonUnited Kingdom

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 19


“We should strengthenthe notion of engage-ment of the university

in civil society as atwo-way benefit. Therehas to be an indication

that our objective is to provide interesting

models of engagementrather than one-size-

fits-all, and also provide examples of

good practice.”

Shamsh Kassim-LakhaAga Khan University

Pakistan

PROM I S I NG FUTU R E OPPORTU N ITI E S

The information presents a rich mosaic that broadly depicts civic engagement as

a global movement characterized by impressive energy, ambitious plans to achieve

those visions, an appetite for increased collaboration among institutions, and a

strong desire to move towards collective action.

Universities can work together to shape this future, its direction and scale. Three

important factors make this period a timely moment for shaping civic engagement:

• The societal needs on which civic engagement rests are immense in a period

in which the higher education sector is continuing to expand dramatically. This

means we can anticipate increased pressure on our institutions to apply their

resources to these needs.

• This movement is showing the potential to approach critical mass and is no

longer an isolated reality.

• There is increasing awareness of the effectiveness of civic work as the evidence

of educational outcomes and community benefit mounts.

Together these three factors yield a terrific leverage opportunity for the higher

education sector to contribute to building social capital and making a significant

difference in our respective societies.

OTH E R PE RS PECTIVE S AN D DI SCUSS ION

The discussion that followed Dean Hollister’s presentation centered on issues

such as whether civic engagement helps students learn better and produce better

results at university, the relationship between civic engagement and human

rights, and the values underpinning civic engagement.

Sir Roderick Floud (London Metropolitan University, United Kingdom): The

“third mission” is now increasingly established in different forms in all U.K. uni-

versities and is made possible by the fact that the government provides funding.

It takes the form of what is described as “civic engagement” or “industrial engage-

ment,” which perhaps goes back to some of the foundations of the universities in

the U.S and U.K.

Most U.K. universities are engaged in community outreach, industrial service,

and civic engagement in preparing students for civil society. As I understand the

position in the rest of Europe, it is obviously more mixed: there are still some

universities that reject civic engagement, emphasizing the universal values of

research and the classical tradition of the university, and seek to distance them-

selves from many of these things to pursue scholarship and research. But this is

a declining group and the vast majority of universities, particularly in the former

Soviet bloc, see themselves as “creating democracy.” It is a strong imperative in

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 20


many of those countries, but against enormous odds. We shouldn’t underesti-

mate the enormous resource constraints and the difficulty of deciding priorities

in a situation in which universities are underfinanced.

Sung-Joo Han (Korea University, South Korea): There is a debate whether

scholars should be involved in public affairs, and, if so, where universities should

engage. Does it help you to be a better teacher or researcher? Does it make you a

better public servant?

Universities can teach better, and students can learn better as a result of social

and public engagements. They can do better research. We have many purists

who say scholars should be in an ivory tower, should not come out into the

street and be involved in society. Perhaps there are different roles, depending on

whether society is at a developing or developed stage, but in both cases the uni-

versity (faculty and students) is an important agent of modernization and glob-

alization, both in teaching and research. So we shouldn’t worry about the

conflict or competition among these three elements of teaching, research, and

civic engagement.

Monica Jiménez de la Jara (Catholic University of Temuco, Chile): It is impor-

tant to distinguish between different types of human rights. The first generation of

human rights comprises civic and political rights; then we have second-generation

human rights—social and economic rights; and then come the rights of peace,

safety, and the environment. This distinction helps me place the university in a

human rights framework and one can have activities related to each of these gen-

erations of human rights. It is useful to have a framework that is universal.

Behind civic and political rights lie values of dignity and freedom. Behind socio-

economic rights lie values of the common good and equity. Behind third-generation

rights lay values of sustainability, human development, and acceptance. These values

should inform all the different activities of the university—research, teaching, and

the link with society. As university presidents, faculty, students, and administrative

workers, we must all reflect on these values and put them into practice.

“We had to bring thesocial scientists anddoctors together, towork with the commu-nities in villages toexplore the culturalpractices, to inculcatepositive practices in theschooling system andfrown on bad practices.To us it was a betterway of producing amore relevant doctorfor the conditions ofTanzania than was previously the case.”

Mathew L. LuhangaUniversity of Dar es SalaamTanzania

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 21


“We should make adistinction betweenpolitical and socialactivism and civicengagement. We cannot discourageactivism; activism hascontributed to manydemocratic transitions.Instead of discouragingit, we should channel it.”

Sung-Joo HanKorea UniversitySouth Korea

Civic engagement presents an opportunity to link values with action, and to

monitor the impact of such action. We call this social responsibility and we think

that the university helps build countries and societies. By relating to public and

private sectors and organizations, big and small, our students learn more and

better, and our society benefits from our research. We are part of the society and

we have to ask about its needs. Georgetown University is thinking global, they are

preparing leaders for all countries; we think about social responsibility in our

country and in small communities where we are.

Robert Hollister (Tufts University, United States of America): Is it in fact the

case that students involved in civic engagement learn better?

Rupa Shah (SNDT Women’s University of Mumbai, India): This is in fact so,

partly because my university focuses on issues closely related to the democratic and

human rights of women and because it adopts an interdisciplinary approach.

Apart from civic and political matters, we include social and economic rights

in order to help alleviate the high levels of economic inequality in rural India

where the societal norms have subjugated women. Some of our civic engagement

programs are on peace and environmental sustainability. Today women manage

bio-waste, dairy, and water-harvesting projects. The interdisciplinary approach

makes it possible to adopt a comprehensive approach to community develop-

ment. It becomes a melting pot that offers enormous opportunities for students,

and the teams are drawn from different areas of teaching.

Mathew L. Luhanga (University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania): Students

involved in civic engagement learn better. There are two examples from my uni-

versity in Tanzania. One is a project called “Research for Democracy in Tanzania.”

Multi-party democracy started in Tanzania in 1992, but we could not simply

import the principles and practices from Europe. Lots of publications and

research were produced and these fed into our work at the university so that today

we are producing a different type of political scientist in Tanzania and the teach-

ing is better.

In medicine we were teaching our students in the traditional way, but we

were not producing sufficient numbers of medical practitioners to meet the

demand. Furthermore, certain behaviors and cultural practices were con-

tributing to the incidence of illness in communities. So we had to bring the

social scientists and doctors together, to work closely with the communities in

villages. Together they explored cultural practices so as to inculcate positive

practices in the schooling system and frown on bad practices. This helped

reduce the burden on the curative side of medicine and provided a better way

of producing a more relevant doctor for the conditions of Tanzania than was

previously the case.

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 22


John Kaburise (University for Development Studies, Ghana): Universities

nevertheless face a challenge that stems from society’s own perception about the

desirability of getting the university involved in community activities. There is a

fear that we might introduce concepts that will affect socialization in the com-

munity, and perhaps undermine indigenous knowledge that is very useful to

society—preventative medicine and nutrition that is being lost over the years.

Civic engagement helps us tap those aspects of traditional knowledge that are

useful. My university has recognized a distinguished practitioner of traditional

medicine who has perfected her knowledge in this area and is being sought by

orthodox western medical practitioners. We have awarded her a doctorate and

she gives lectures to our students on life skills, basic health, and the nutritional

value of our traditional foods.

Radmila Marinkovic-Neducin (University of Novi Sad, Serbia and Montenegro):

It is important to articulate what form civic engagement takes in a university.

It is not sufficient for civic engagement to be embedded, hidden. We are not

NGOs; we are institutions and civic engagement must be defined. Is it integral to

the curriculum? Is it extra-curricular? Last year we introduced three new curric-

ula, drawing on the experience of non-governmental organizations. One of these

has to do with peace studies, working through a regional center and covering

three aspects: self-management, conflict, and post-conflict circumstances.

Shamsh Kassim-Lakha (Aga Khan University, Pakistan): In the case of the

Aga Khan University, civic engagement was at the center of the rationale for

establishing the institution.

“Although more than50 percent of studentsare involved in civicengagement, researchand scholarship in ourcountry tend to bemore academic. If ithas entrepreneurialvalue, then it is consid-ered to be very strong,but not necessarily forcivic engagement.”

Crispin P. BetitaNotre Dame of Marbel UniversityPhilippines

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 23


“One option may be tocreate a special research

center that could helpdrive civic engagement

research. We at Haifaare considering estab-lishing such a center.”

Aaron Ben-Ze’evUniversity of Haifa

Israel

Our university is only 23 years old and we state in our charter that we shall be

part of the community; the purpose of the university is to help people develop.

While some universities tended to discourage women from enrolling in their

medical colleges due to their domestic roles, at my university we have more

women than men in the health sciences and education programs. In each of these

programs there is a huge commitment to community engagement especially in

urban slums. Civic engagement creates awareness of people’s rights and how they

can help themselves. For example one of our

health projects has helped to dramatically

reduce infant and maternal mortality

through awareness creation.

Juan Vela Valdés (University of Havana,

Cuba): The role of universities cannot be

isolated from the rest of education; there

must be a link between primary, secondary,

and tertiary education.

Civic engagement means that the students

learn more, the teachers are more profound in

their thinking, and the university is more use-

ful for society. But there must be consensus—

in the academic community, in civil society

and in all strategies and policy of govern-

ment—that civic engagement is important.

At this moment the most important divi-

sion between rich and poor is knowledge; so

the universities, as part of the knowledge

society, must be in the front line, with a

commitment to society.

“There is the need forfunding to supportcommunity projectsand there is a new cul-ture of social responsi-bility in whichcompanies are moreinterested in investingin this area, but corpo-rate social responsibil-ity operates accordingto certain economicmodels that may con-flict with communityinterests.”

Gustavo AlvimMethodist University of PiracicabaBrazil

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 24


Universities are facing huge challenges,

one of which is the increase in the popula-

tion. The environment is changing owing to

pollution, lack of food, water, energy and

now the World Trade Organization is debat-

ing the internationalization of higher edu-

cation, treating higher education as a

commodity, not as a public good. So it is the

responsibility of the university to know how

it can be more useful to the society; how the

community sees it, and how we can learn

from the people and increase our knowl-

edge through bilateral action.

Aaron Ben-Ze’ev (University of Haifa,

Israel): It would be helpful to create a com-

mon vocabulary.

There is “civic engagement” and “social

responsibility.”The latter is a broader and pos-

sibly a more appropriate term. Responsibility

speaks to engagement and “social” is broader

than “civic.” However, the term is common in

the business community. Could we use social

responsibility instead of civic engagement?

Iqbal Paroo (Omidyar Network, United States of America): Many of the com-

ments beg an important question: Is the university in service of society relevant

and responsive to the emerging needs, or is it an ivory tower separate from society?

We all live in society, as do our students. Are we preparing our students to

advance human social evolution (e.g. human rights) in a practical, responsive

way? This is a highly selected group, so we need to figure out a way to continue

this dialogue when we leave. More importantly, we need to come up with a

process that will create a bottom-up desire to strengthen the global movement

that we aspire to create with institutions taking an active role in civic engage-

ment. This group should not become a cohesive clique of know-it-all institu-

tions. To create a movement one needs to rely on the bottom-up participation of

many institutions that for many reasons are not at this table.

“Faculty members’engagement doesdepend in large measure on how thediscipline fits withengagement as a scholarly activity. Weneed to be respectful of this reality.”

John J. DeGioiaGeorgetown UniversityUnited States of America

“The access of youngpeople who come frompoor homes to a qualityinstitution of highereducation constitutesa strong challenge tomaintaining the equalityof opportunities...I consider it valuableto develop researchand career develop-ment opportunitiesfocused on facingthese challenges andneeds in our societies.”

Silvio Israel FeldmanNational University of General SarmientoArgentina

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 25


CAlison Bernstein Vice President for Knowledge, Creativity and Freedom,

Ford Foundation, United States of America

PPUUBBLLIICC PPOOLLIICCYY AANNDD HHIIGGHHEERR EEDDUUCCAATTIIOONN:: AA CCAALLLL TTOO AACCTTIIOONN

Civic engagement is a cross-cutting issue that bears on the work

of government, civil society, the private sector, and higher educa-

tion institutions. While these sectors approach civic engagement

from different perspectives, the goal is to build social capital and

create an environment for reciprocity. Since universities are rela-

tively well resourced in terms of both human and physical capital,

they are well positioned to play a key role in engaging society.

Notwithstanding the importance of the role of faculty or depart-

ments as vehicles for civic engagement programs, the university’s

commitment to this mission should be judged on how any civic

education program impacts its mission and policy.

Civic Engagement

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 26


“Our institutions shouldemphasize not only thevalue of public service,in and of itself, but wealso need to help ourstudents to understandthat they can shape,and have a long-termimpact on the publicpolicies, resources, andresearch in the commu-nities that they serve.”

John DiBiaggioTufts UniversityUnited States of America

The U.S. president has called hurricane Katrina a natural disaster. This is only

partly true. Nature had something to do with this, and global warming is a fac-

tor. The real issue is the inability of government to exercise its civic role and

responsibility. As with Katrina, we seem to know when institutions, public and

private, don’t fulfill their civic roles and responsibilities—a public utility fails to

get the lights back on, trains fail to run on time, hospitals and nursing homes fail

to honor their duty, and so forth. But how would we know when colleges and

universities are failing to fulfill their civic roles and responsibilities?

While there is a range of policies and programs that promotes civic

engagement in teaching, research, public scholarship, and the promotion of

student service for credit, the real test of whether a higher education institution

is fulfilling its civic roles and responsibility must be applied at the highest

level: the activity of the board, the leadership of the president, and the insti-

tution’s mission and policies.

FOSTE R I NG PU B LIC PARTICI PATION

Universities can initiate a wide array of programs and policies that foster par-

ticipation, ranging from social to political dimensions in societies. What is

important, however, is for universities to fulfill their civic role without being

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 27


misconstrued as being partisan. The major social institutions that are likely to

partner with universities include local governments, the nongovernmental

community and the education sector.

For example, in the mid-1960s Princeton University established a mid-

October break, which was designed to enable students, faculty, and staff to work

in elections and canvas for politicians of their choice. This serves as an example

of a university policy designed to promote civic engagement. Universities can

also promote nonpartisan public participation by sponsoring a United Way or

Red Cross blood drive, recycling, or providing space for the community to hold

critical meetings. For example, in Oshakati in northern Namibia, the University

of Namibia provided space for a polling station and meeting space where the

public could hear local candidates speak.

Universities and colleges have a particular role to play in expanding political

participation, especially in the global south. By contrast, the situation is different

in northern countries. For example in the U.S., political participation is not on

the front burner as far as the role of the universities is concerned, except possi-

bly in 2004 when the presidential debates were held on the campuses of three

U.S. universities.

The promotion of civic engagement as part of the universities’ institutional

mission should typically take three forms:

• Articulation with the public school system. Higher education should

establish a direct relationship with schools in order to do its job properly.

This is not to suggest that a university should take over a local school dis-

trict, but that at the highest level of the institution, engagement with public

schooling becomes a mission of the senior leadership. For example a small

Catholic college in the U.S. awards teachers’ certificates for continuing pro-

fessional development after every five years. This is because these teachers

are products of the institution and it is in the interest of the college to main-

tain a relationship with them. In the U.S. there have also been remarkable

high schools that have been established on community college campuses—

recruiting young people who have dropped out and failed in the mainstream

schooling system.

• Articulation with nongovernmental organizations serving in the publicinterest. Al-Quds University provides an example. It is home of the only inde-

pendent broadcaster in the West Bank, providing a C-Span type service featuring

debates in the Palestinian legislative assembly.

• Articulation with local government. Turning to partnerships between uni-

versities and local government, most colleges and universities are resource-rich

compared with other public institutions, especially in terms of human capital,

“Does the failure ofuniversities to engage

students in active political participation

constitute a failure to fulfill their

civic engagementresponsibility?”

Alison Bernstein Ford Foundation

United States of America

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page 28


infrastructure (including facilities), power, and influence. They teach, produce

new knowledge, and provide services to local communities. One tends to find

examples of university-sanctioned civic engagement projects in fields of profes-

sional education such as dentistry clinics, public interest law programs, medicine

clinics, etc. By contrast, the traditional liberal arts and science disciplines are more

suspicious of, and resistant to, this kind of outreach.

Strengthening engagement in these three directions requires an allocation of

financial resources at the highest level of the institution. This may be one reason

why there are major differences between institutions around the globe in the rate

and level of civic engagement. Some universities register great success while oth-

ers have had only limited success.

In the field of public schooling, for example, universities have the most direct

relationship in the training of teachers. At the same time they also generate

knowledge and act as resource centers for curriculum development at schools.

Despite this, many universities and colleges are not sufficiently involved in the

debates about “intelligent design.”

WHO S HOU LD STR E NGTH E N U N IVE RS ITI E S

FOR CIVIC E NGAG E M E NT?

To date, it has been students who have promoted civic engagement in universities

for the most part, mainly through work with nongovernmental organizations.

My question is: “Is it a failure to leave the commitment to work with non-

governmental organizations only to students? Is it the students or the university

that should carry the commitment?”

Brenda Gourley, while vice chancellor of the University of Natal in South

Africa, facilitated a dynamic relationship between the University of Natal and

nongovernmental organizations active in the struggle against apartheid. The

closest that U.S. institutions got to this level of engagement was supporting

divestment from South Africa during apartheid.

While universities benefit from working with the private sector, they should

also know more about how they can work with the government. There are many

books about how universities are selling their souls to the corporate sector, but

little about how universities are influencing policy development.

How can the university president and board engage concretely with the civic

demands of communities at the local and state level? Who should be taking action?

One example of a community engagement initiative taken at the Ford

Foundation itself is a fund called the “Good Neighbor Committee,” which seeks

to help develop the local community. This program is run by Ford’s support staff,

“It is important to articulate what formcivic engagement takesin a university. It is not sufficient for civicengagement to beembedded, hidden.”

Radmila Marinkovic-NeducinUniversity of Novi SadSerbia and Montenegro

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 29


“It is important thatstaff of the university,or scholars, model whatit is they are espousingto teach. There istremendous diversity in communities. Ratherthan an individual university engagingwith a community, oneshould disaggregatethis into different interest groups.”

Kerry CoxUniversity of BallaratAustralia

not program staff, and underscores the Foundation’s commitment to working

for the common good of its immediate community.

Universities should consider setting up a trustee committee which looks at

the university as a civic minded player, and engage in a planning process. Ultimately,

university leaders should use their power to level the playing field and set new

standards in community engagement.

OTH E R PE RS PECTIVE S AN D DI SCUSS ION

Sung-Joo Han (Korea University, South Korea): Some of the examples you

cite may be construed as taking sides in the political debate and a university can’t

afford to be involved in that controversy. How do you resolve that?

Alison Bernstein (Ford Foundation, United States of America): I tried to give

non-partisan examples e.g. getting more individuals on your campus to enroll to

vote or working with schools and districts in a more intentional and systematic

way. The only political example is the case of divestment in South Africa.

Universities exist in a context and their relationship with that context must

operate at the highest level. While community service and other programs do a

lot, I don’t think that university leadership has grappled enough with the ques-

tion of how top management gets involved in civic engagement.

Sung-Joo Han: In Korea any one of the examples (e.g. registering to vote)

would be considered partisan.

Alison Bernstein: If the administration were serious about it, they would work

out ways of making it nonpartisan.

Sung-Joo Han: Helping NGOs that are advocacy groups would be seen to be

supporting one or more policy position. It could be construed as taking sides in

a sensitive debate.

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 30


Alison Bernstein: The Ford Foundation draws a line between policy analysis

and lobbying for a specific piece of legislation. The latter is not allowed by

grantees who receive Ford funding. One needs to distinguish between these two.

For example if we allow students to hold the local chapter of Amnesty

International on campus, we have already said that it is a legitimate organization.

We don’t seem to have any problem aligning universities with corporations—

and, of course, they have agendas too. Why is it okay for engineering to have a set

of contracts with big companies, but the political science department can’t

engage with policy advocacy?

David Arnold (American University in Cairo, Egypt): There are rules and reg-

ulations that govern how foundation funds can be used for lobbying, etc. But the

key for our purpose is to think of linkages that are organic to finding partners,

many of whom will be in the NGO or the public sector. We shouldn’t hold back

from forging those types of partnerships.

Brenda Gourley (The Open University, United Kingdom): The University of

Natal (now KwaZulu-Natal) hosted a large number of NGOs that were essentially

engaged in activities that were not supported by the apartheid government of the

day. This was a risky position and had to be exercised with care because the whole

university enterprise was exposed. The university community took that risk, a

political risk, that it offer refuge to people doing fine work in difficult circum-

stances, and the then government knew it would have to take on the university if

it wanted to stop that work. There is no doubt that the community served by

these NGOs appreciated the university’s position.

Alison Bernstein: Take an example from Latin America: When the Pinochet

regime was systematically weeding out academics from the University of Chile

and other universities, a number of universities decided to provide refuge to

these academics and give them a place to work. That is an example of a different

kind of civic engagement that requires a political judgment; the same kind of

thing could come to pass anywhere, even in the U.S.

Monica Jiménez de la Jara (Catholic University of Temuco, Chile):

Examining the context of university engagement, I was active in the Catholic

University in Santiago during the Pinochet regime, but when in 1998 we

launched a big campaign to register people, I had to go outside the university to

create an NGO called Participa because it was impossible to do this inside the

university. The principal and the institution didn’t want to work with us because

they were afraid of the repression by the Pinochet regime. I produced a public

service announcement, just to publicize the dates of registration, but couldn’t get

it broadcast, even though the NGO was not named.

“I believe the actionplan for civic engage-ment needs to be apolicy of the university,not simply extra-muralactivities on the part ofthe students.”

Monica Jiménez de la JaraCatholic University of TemucoChile

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 31


Today we don’t have repression and we can work with schools, the teachers,

NGOs, government, and business because we are in a democracy and have the

freedom to do so. Nevertheless, we are a small group because the university doesn’t

care about this type of program. I believe the action plan for civic engagement

needs to be a policy of the university, not simply extra-mural activities on the part

of the students.

Alison Bernstein: Universities in countries like the U.S. support more extracur-

ricular activities than other countries and therefore should not leave all civic

engagement programs to the faculty level.

Bruno Sion (Saint-Joseph University, Lebanon): The movement for a univer-

sity-wide response to the struggle for democracy in Lebanon appealed to the

moral authority of the university. It protected students against military action by

providing them with places of refuge, and kept the military out. With its unique

location across the “green line” which divided Beirut between Christians and

Muslims it managed to involve as many political parties as possible.

Alison Bernstein: I don’t think universities should be the place where every

group should find a home. It is a process that begins with pulling together the

university community to say what are we, as an institution, prepared to do? What

democratic values can we support both on and off campus? We need to address

this as part of the university mission.

Shamsh Kassim-Lakha (Aga Khan University, Pakistan): I liked the reference

to the university trustees and faculty being involved, as well as the students. The

rewards are huge. Aga Khan University has worked to change the way that stu-

dents in the school systems are examined, and this was done by engaging with

three successive governments in Pakistan. Each supported the initiative, but none,

except President Musharraf, had the length of office to carry it forward. There was

tremendous resistance in some parts of the community, but we are now succeed-

ing step by step. So it is most important to look at the upstream issues.

Gasim Badri (Ahfad University for Women, Sudan): Let’s also look at donors

and civic engagement. In the Sudan we had support from Ford and other donors,

but when the current regime came to power, donors withdrew and left us to fend

for ourselves. This suggests that the Ford Foundation is neglecting its civic respon-

sibility. It is the wrong policy for donors to leave nongovernmental organizations

to fend for themselves, knowing that it is difficult for them—both in terms of

funding and the politically hostile environment in which they are working.

“American University inCairo’s social researchcenter is the most fullydeveloped field-based

social science researchcenter in the MiddleEast region. It does

rigorous policy-orientedwork that informs andshapes understanding

of societal problemsand government

responses to thoseproblems whether

maternal, child, health,water provision, literacy,

etc. They have done anextraordinary job.”

David ArnoldAmerican University in Cairo

Egypt

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 32


Alison Bernstein: The Ford Foundation did close its office in Khartoum, but

now has a higher education specialist in Cairo who is interested in connecting

higher education in Egypt to the sector in Sudan. But we understand that we

were seen to have abandoned you.

Vo-Tong Xuan (An Giang University, Vietnam): Linking the university with

public schooling is very positive, because schools produce the students for the

university. The quality of general education is declining, especially in Vietnam,

and so we need to put enormous effort into producing a new crop of teachers.

We are now doing research with existing teachers in order to help them improve

their methods of teaching and the way in which they produce resources for us at

the university.

Liz Hollander (Campus Compact, United States of America): U.S. colleges

are doing a lot to register voters on campuses. I have learned here how serious

people in other countries are about developing the skills to run nongovernmental

organizations. There are very few programs in the U.S. to train the next genera-

tion for NGO development.

Rupa Shah (SNDT Women’s University of Mumbai, India): How does one

involve the staff? Making them capable of civic involvement is one thing, but get-

ting them involved when they are part-time is another.

Alison Bernstein: University staff often feel alienated because of class issues—

faculty and students often live in different places, for example. Staff representa-

tives need to be involved in the planning process from the beginning, in order to

help shape a university-wide response. The Ford Foundation’s experience of the

“Good Neighbor Committee” suggests that staff do want to take the time to get

involved in making grant allocations in the neighborhood. It was a very promis-

ing way of involving staff at the organization.

“We need to recognizehow research prioritiesare shaped; the priori-ties which becamehegemonic after 1945reflected the hugeincrease in funding fueled by the Cold War.The position of institu-tions like MIT was historically constructedat a particular moment.To recognize the role of history in this way is to raise difficult andintriguing questions about very differentdefinitions of research.”

John RowettAssociation of Commonwealth UniversitiesUnited Kingdom

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 33


TPPLLAACCIINNGG CCIIVVIICC EENNGGAAGGEEMMEENNTT AATT TTHHEE CCEENNTTEERR OOFF HHIIGGHHEERR EEDDUUCCAATTIIOONN

Talloires Conference participants worked in sub-groups on three

broad challenges: organizing the university for civic engagement,

research and scholarship, and government policy and resources.

ORGAN IZ I NG TH E U N IVE RS ITY FOR CIVIC E NGAG E M E NT

How can the university best be organized for civic engagement?

Does civic engagement lie at the heart of the university or is it

an ‘add-on’ to the mission of teaching and scholarship?

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 34


Challenges and opportunities in mainstreaming civic engagement

In a number of institutions a weak culture of civic engagement within the academic

environment results in an incongruence of goals between the university and its

immediate community (faculty and students). Faculty come to universities with

personal and professional interests that do not necessarily coincide with civic or

social issues. This affects research priorities and makes it difficult to integrate

civic issues into the curriculum.

Those universities with a strong tradition of civic engagement show that it is pos-

sible to infuse teaching and the curriculum with the values and content necessary to

develop an ethos of citizenship among faculty and students. In Sudan, for example,

the location of the Ahfad University for Women within a highly impoverished com-

munity has made courses in education, women’s studies, and population studies a

requirement for all students. In Brazil, a commitment by the Methodist University

of Piracicaba to building the capacity of civil society has resulted in close collabora-

tion between faculty, the nongovernmental sector and government. However, as

noted earlier, these universities face significant challenges in terms of human capac-

ity and financial resources, as well as the need for academic recognition.

“In Lebanon, we have a strong tradition ofresearch about society,in both Christian andMuslim communities.”

Bruno SionSaint-Joseph UniversityLebanon

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 35


“The overall appreciationand support for civicengagement is well

understood by the faculty and Board of

Trustees of my institution. There is acore group of faculty

that is highly moti-vated and this puts a

premium on our Officeof Public Service to

support these effortsand motivate others.”

Mark GearanHobart and William Smith Colleges


The university leaders identified three factors that influence the ability of uni-

versities to make civic engagement core to their operations:

1) The “massification” of higher education around the world introduces the

possibility of pedagogical and curriculum reform, but this is a consider-

able challenge, particularly in terms of sufficient faculty supervision.

2) The political environment in which universities operate may constrain

their efforts to foster civic engagement. In the context of a repressive

political environment, for example, democracy education and the pro-

motion of civic awareness may be “taboo.” The experience of the former

University of Natal in South Africa prior to the democratic dispensation

shows, however, that a university can function as a safe haven in a politi-

cally turbulent context, which in turn affected faculty and students.

3) Teaching and research in many universities have traditionally been uncou-

pled from the realm of civic engagement and community development.

University leaders thus have the task of fostering an institutional outlook

that sees the institution “working with the society” rather than being sepa-

rated from it.

Strategies for organizing the university for civic engagementUniversities have a mandate to educate and train responsible and dedicated

citizens. In light of this duty, universities should revisit their founding

principles and locate civic engagement within their institutional frame-

work. In years that follow, those students may assume key political posi-

tions and are then in a position to infuse policy and legislative action with

civic values.

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 36


Alongside an enabling institutional policy for civic engagement, the existence

of central administrative capacity is crucial to the university’s reaching out to the

broader university community, managing community-university partnerships,

and encouraging civic engagement at all levels of the institution.

It was noted that the normal (discipline-based) organizational structure

of the university does not necessarily lend itself to creating the conditions

required to support civic engagement. For this reason, a number of strate-

gies were suggested to operationalize and coordinate civic engagement at

the university:

• Locate the initiative in the president’s office, as is the case with the “social

capital initiative” at Metropolitan University at Caracas, Venezuela.

• Establish an interdisciplinary coordinating center such as that established

by the University of Cantho to serve complex agricultural needs in

Vietnam’s Mekong Delta.

• Set up a center for social service alongside other issue-specific centers, each of

which represents a means of promoting civic engagement at the university.

Underpinning these structural arrangements, however, is the need for strong

leadership that seeks to make civic engagement core to the university’s activities.

Conference participants were unanimous that there is no contradiction or

dichotomy between civic engagement and excellence. The task of university lead-

ers is to persuade faculty to engage with communities within the context of aca-

demic excellence. It may be possible that the so-called “new generation

universities” find it easier to foster these strategic changes than those universities

that have been in place for much longer, but participants agreed that the task of

changing the outlook of faculty is a key goal in all instances.

Other strategies suggested for making civic engagement part of the academic

enterprise include:

• Designing a system that recognizes and rewards the integration of civic

engagement in teaching and research.

• Finding funding for good civic engagement projects and making such

financial support available to faculty for teaching and research. Faculty

should also be encouraged to bid for worthwhile projects around policy

development and research.

“In Cuba socialengagement is a veryold matter. It startseven when children arein primary school. Wehave a philosophy ofeducation and work atall levels of education(primary, secondary,and higher education)and all our majors havea lot of hours in thecurriculum that arecommunity-basedlearning., e.g. medicaldoctors do not starttheir training in thelaboratories of biology,histology, etc.”

Juan Vela ValdésUniversity of HavanaCuba

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 37


• Recognizing civic engagement in processes of hiring, compensation, and

academic promotion. Strategies suggested here include establishing a “civic

engagement ranking system” that could be used to guide faculty remuneration

and tenure, and building civic engagement into performance management

processes. While these measures may be controversial in the short-term, they

are bound to guide and inform faculty tenure and reward in the long term.

• Forging international networks.

R E S EARCH AN D SCHOLARS H I P

Despite the provision of “good education” to young people, graduates are often

unable to translate its impact and make it relevant to the wider community. This

disjuncture between societal needs and educational outcomes provides an oppor-

tunity for universities to develop new knowledge through civic engagement with

the wider society. Rather than having civic engagement as a “third leg”of the

higher education mission, universities should infuse it throughout their strategic

thinking, particularly as far as scholarship is concerned.

This seems to be happening in developing countries, where universities are

increasingly being regarded as a resource for national development. In Indonesia,

for example, many faculty recognize the key role that universities play in inte-

grating the nation, while in South Africa, community service is being cited as one

of the quality assurance indicators used to measure the responsiveness of univer-

sities to national and local imperatives.

Challenges and opportunities for research and civic engagementIn some cases, ideological differences around research may draw negative reac-

tions from government as is the case in countries like Korea, Egypt, and Sudan.

The governments in these countries have taken a hostile position towards univer-

sities that publish research findings that are contrary to the official perspective.

However, faculty at the University for Development Studies in Ghana and at the

University of Havana in Cuba are committed to placing civic engagement at the

heart of their research agendas due to the supportive climate for university civic

engagement in those countries. Cuba’s philosophy of education has made it pos-

sible to prioritize curricula and research programs that are community-based. It

proceeds from the standpoint that the university needs to prepare men and

women to live in the twenty-first century in a way that does not destroy the envi-

ronment. Faculty must teach students about the challenges that they will face in

this world. The research interest in civic engagement is closely related to the

socioeconomic context in which universities operate.

“Although both private funding and

government policy arehelpful, they are not

necessarily required foruniversities to support

civic engagement activities or developing

partnerships with communities.”

Susan StroudInnovations in Civic Participation


87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 38


In the United States and the United Kingdom, there has been some resistance to

civic engagement as a legitimate field of research and scholarship; research on civic

engagement is not recognized by peer-reviewed journals as an area of legitimate schol-

arship. Two strategies have been used to integrate civic engagement more closely into

the university’s research agenda: conducting needs assessments to generate demand-

driven projects and making grants available to stimulate community-based research.

University leaders thus have a crucial role to play in establishing civic engagement

as a legitimate area of research and scholarship. By generating an understanding of

how action research and community engagement can be mutually beneficial to

communities as well as to the institution, the university leadership stands a bet-

ter chance of persuading donors to support community-based research.

Infusing civic engagement into research and scholarshipNational policy frameworks can facilitate the university’s ability to make civic engage-

ment a priority within research and scholarship. In Serbia and Montenegro, for

example, the passage of new higher education legislation has made it possible for the

University of Novi Sad to elevate civic engagement as an integral part of the univer-

sity’s mandate. In South Africa the government is in a developmental state, and this cre-

ates many opportunities to undertake research that can influence policy formulation.

Universities can benefit from a reciprocal relationship with their communities.

Some have made civic engagement part of their curriculum and place specific

emphasis on participatory or applied research. Most university leaders concurred

that while applied research has never conflicted with traditional research, it is a

good vehicle for community engagement.

The status of civic engagement could be transformed through benchmarking

practice against examples of excellence. Universities can draw examples of good prac-

tice from a range of sources such as the European universities’ Bologna Declaration

and the Association of Commonwealth Universities. Creating space in the global

arena for research on civic engagement was also identified as an important goal.

Incentives that reward faculty on the basis of their interest in civic engagement

are crucial. Examples include the University of Caracas in Venezuela, the Syarif

Hidayatullah State Islamic University in Indonesia, and Georgetown University in

the United States of America where civic or social engagement is one of the crite-

ria for tenure and promotion. In some cases it has proved difficult to encourage

faculty to move from a narrow disciplinary focus to cooperating around commu-

nity-based research projects because discipline-based research is easier to conduct

and is often better funded.

Collaborative forums and projects could slowly build a critical mass of faculty

with an active research interest in civic engagement. Examples from the Aga Khan

“There is an inherentconflict in the currentdominant research paradigm. If we are todevelop a new paradigmit has to start withgraduate education.We also need to paymore attention to the student outcomes ofcivic engagement. There is not yet astrong enough body ofresearch that documentsthe causal effects ofcivic engagement incollege on life long citizenship inclinations,abilities and actions.”

Liz HollanderCampus CompactUnited States of America

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 39


“The main challenge isthe distinction between

research and scholar-ship on the one hand

and social values includ-ing civic engagement onthe other. While the two

are distinct from oneanother, ways should be

found to informresearch with civic

engagement values.”

Sari NusseibehAl-Quds University

Palestine

University in Pakistan, the University of Dar es Salaam in Tanzania, An Giang

University in Vietnam, and Tufts University in the United States demonstrate how

significant the impact of a multi-disciplinary approach can be. In their respective

studies, they set up cross-disciplinary research teams (drawing together health,

natural and social scientists, for example) to address societal problems ranging

from HIV/ AIDS to obesity. Based on these studies it is clear that if each discipline

looks beyond its own specialized field, particularly in addressing local or national

problems, the efforts are likely to yield powerful results.

GOVE R N M E NT POLICY AN D R E SOU RCE S

Government policy and funding are two factors that shape the environment in

which civic engagement can function, and conference participants agreed that

both make an impact on the nature and extent of university civic engagement.

Although there are not many examples of explicit government support for

university-level civic engagement, universities can nevertheless achieve a great

deal by establishing strategic partnerships with the public sector so as to enhance

the impact of community engagement. The example of An Giang University in

Vietnam shows how university-government collaboration can benefit the society

as a whole. As part of the country’s reconstruction program after the Vietnam

War, the university went ahead with its research in the agricultural sector with-

out waiting for government assistance. By the time funding became available,

much of the groundwork had already been done and the university was able to

amplify its efforts in partnership with government.

Influencing public policy Regardless of policy constraints, universities should be proactive in promoting

civic and social engagement, preferably in relation to national priorities. This

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 40


helps capture the attention of government, funding bodies, and other partners in

the development arena. As the experience of the Aga Khan University in Pakistan

shows, universities can contribute to “evidence-based” policy change.

Universities have the responsibility of creating an awareness of civic engage-

ment within the government and wider society. The Catholic University of

Temuco in Chile provides a cogent example in this respect: research was con-

ducted by the university at schools to establish the pupils’ knowledge about and

attitudes towards civic issues, and this paved the way for the Ministry of

Education to provide financial support for a civic engagement program.

Funding for civic engagementThe competition for funds between civic engagement and mainstream teaching and

research activities is a key challenge. Universities in both developed and developing

countries face budgetary constraints when it

comes to financing civic engagement teach-

ing and research. In some cases government

and donor agencies are selective in the proj-

ects they prioritize for funding. In Korea, for

example, government is more interested in

programs that relate to globalization or

human resource development in broad

terms, and less interested in the needs of local

(non-student) constituencies. While multi-

lateral bodies such as the Association of

South East Asia Nations and the United

Nations University (in Japan) emphasize

manpower development, they seldom con-

sult with other development partners to

identify areas of greatest need. Financial support must be sought from multiple fun-

ders, including sources in the private sector. The collaboration between the

Australian universities and IBM (which inter alia supports MBA students on the

basis of their interest in community work) could be a model for other universities.

Broadening civic participationCurrently, university-led civic engagement is confined within national borders;

this ignores the interdependence of universities and countries in the global envi-

ronment. A call was thus made to participants to broaden the meaning of “civic”

to “global civil society.” Networking at the international, regional, and national

levels is a potential means of increasing leverage for civic engagement by build-

ing awareness among universities, providing platforms for resource mobilization

and facilitating greater understanding and appreciation for civic engagement.

“Our new institution has inherited a greatchallenge in promotingresearch capacity as a starting point. The institutions were tech-nikons (like polytech-nics) offering diplomaswith very little research,but since the 1990shave been able to offerdegrees up to doctorallevel where there is capacity. Appliedresearch is the focus of the new institutionand in this context wehave an opportunity to ensure that civicengagement is takeninto account.”

Marcus BalintuloCape Peninsula University of TechnologySouth Africa

“The challenge is notprioritization—for us the civic engagementobligation exists. Thechallenge is to find thefunding to supportresearch and find out-lets through which topublish such research.”

John KaburiseUniversity for Development StudiesGhana

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 41


UIqbal Paroo President and Chief Operating Officer, Omidyar Network, United States of America

EESSTTAABBLLIISSHHIINNGG AA GGLLOOBBAALL NNEETTWWOORRKK

Universities and other organizations operate in a highly

volatile environment. This is a time of transition and invention

that requires new types of networks that can shed traditional

practices and embrace emerging approaches in order to create

leverage for success.

Directions for Action

The Omidyar Network has recognized the need to move beyond the conven-

tional donor/grantee relationship. We seek to develop an “attractor” network. It

expresses our belief that people are basically good, and when given an opportu-

nity to contribute (through leveling the playing fields), are able to introduce

diversity of thought. This generates robust results and optimum solutions. It is

the power of direct, unmediated exchange.

We are a network in the making, and a community of shared interest. The

question is: can we go from shared interest to shared action? How will we work

together, once we have signed the Talloires Declaration?

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 42


CONVE NTIONAL VS. E M E RG I NG N ETWOR KS

Traditional approaches view networks as requiring organization and staff,

being open only to members (i.e. with limited access), relying on periodic

meetings and printed materials, and, most importantly, restricting individ-

ual initiative.

The emerging approach can develop with minimal investment in organiza-

tions, structure, and staff. It can take advantage of emerging technologies, pro-

vide equal access to information (and is thus empowering), can broker

temporary sub-groups, and sustain long-term collaboration.

This approach has a number of advantages: it is cheaper, quicker, more inclu-

sive and more transparent, and exhibits strong self-realizing characteristics that

enhance the self-empowerment of individuals. It is “bottom-up” rather than

“top-down”. While some direction from the top is essential to provide the organ-

izing principle and guidelines, institutions have to allow the network to follow a

bottom-up direction to create a level playing field.

Civic engagement is a two-way relationship: it depends on leveling the

playing field, without which one faces a “we-they” situation of university ver-

sus community.

“We are a network in the making, and acommunity of sharedinterest. The questionis ... How will we worktogether, once we have signed theTalloires Declaration?”

Iqbal Paroo Omidyar NetworkUnited States of America

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 43


OM I DYAR N ETWOR K

Omidyar Network strives for complete openness and transparency. We post all

our financial data for anyone to review and comment on. Everything, except the

payroll in Omidyar Network, is posted. Outside of our own work, anyone inter-

ested in making the world a better place can connect with others who share their

passions. The most exciting and promising aspect of this approach is that it

allows people to share information, supports the exploration of different ideas

and viewpoints, fosters collaboration on different projects, and creates value. We

took public the tool we had internally, and today we have over 10,000 individu-

als on the omidyar.net site. They are engaging in a dialogue through a network

that enables individuals to share, learn, and move discussion into shared action.

Several groups have helped each other review business plans and have given

free advice and resources on the basis of their experience. The uses are bounded

only by people’s interests and their imagination.

HOW DOE S ON E CR EATE

AN E FFECTIVE N ETWOR K?

You do not have to promote civic engagement. Create a mechanism that

addresses people’s interests, and they will be attracted to your network. Shared

goals require the collaborative efforts of all participants. On eBay, 150 million

people transact, but more importantly, they have shown that they can trust a

stranger with every transaction. They join and come to rely on the information

on the basis of sharing it.

An attractor network such as this could provide an excellent platform for the

Talloires Network, particularly because digital tools are a major form of interaction

for young people and would appeal to university students. An attractor network

draws together people on the basis of self-interest; the higher the interest, the

greater the participation. The larger the network, the more there is shared interest.

If you do not participate, the group suffers. So if you are committed to the

movement of civic engagement globally, stay engaged in the process. If you don’t

seize this opportunity to contribute individually, the network suffers.

By staying connected and contributing individually to the Talloires Network,

university leaders could help expand civic engagement exponentially. This will in

turn create other opportunities for true civic engagement that we can’t imagine

as we sit here. We need to create the future and not wait for it to arrive.

“We hope that multiplerelationships will

emerge from this, as well as the begin-ning of a network, aweb of relationships

that is organic.”

Lawrence S. Bacow Tufts University


87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 44


The mission

The Talloires Network is a collective of individuals and

institutions committed to promoting the civic roles and

social responsibilities of higher education. Founded by

the inaugural signers of the Talloires Declaration, the

group is working together to catalyze dialogue, research,

and action to implement recommendations of the

Declaration. All parties interested in furthering the

actions and principles of the Talloires Declaration are

welcome to join the group in this endeavor.

Key goals of the Talloires Network

1. Expand the number of universities signing the

Talloires Declaration and working to enact it

2. Support and disseminate civic and social engage-

ment research

3. Collaborate on a common global project

Members of the Talloires Network are committed to

undertaking the action items outlined in the Declaration

at their universities, and are responsible for encouraging

other university leaders and higher education associa-

tions to sign the Declaration as well.

Several founding members of the Talloires Network

have agreed to collaborate on a global initiative to

increase literacy. This common global project aims both

to accelerate the impact of university resources on a

pressing international problem and to demonstrate the

high potential of collective action by institutions of

higher education around the world. Each participating

institution will be expanding or establishing programs

that apply the expertise and human energies of their fac-

ulty, staff, and students to increasing literacy rates in their

respective locales. Working in coordination with estab-

lished international organizations concerned with liter-

acy, the universities will set collective goals, exchange best

practices, and support one another’s efforts.

Contributing to research about civic and social

engagement is also a key goal of the Network. Two proj-

ects are currently being planned: a worldwide survey on

the civic attitudes and actions of university students, and

a book about the global civic engagement movement of

higher education. The efforts of the Talloires Network

will be strengthened by producing empirical data about

the civic engagement of universities and their constituen-

cies. This data will contribute to policy reform and bol-

ster university-led civic engagement.

Opportunities to Participate

A web site located at www.tufts.edu/talloiresnetwork has

information on joining the Network. Please visit the site,

join the Talloires Declaration Network, and begin to engage

with fellow signatories.

TH E TALLOI R E S N ETWOR K: STR E NGTH E N I NG TH E CIVIC ROLE S

AN D SOCIAL R E S PON S I B I LITI E S OF H IG H E R E DUCATION

87716 7/24/06 9:11 AM Page 45

The 2005 Talloires Conference on The Civic Roles and Social Responsibilities of Higher Education was organized by the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service at Tufts University, U.S.A., in collaboration with Innovations in Civic Participation, U.S.A.

This report is available in PDF format at http://www.tufts.edu/talloiresnetwork/conference.shtml

For additional copies of this report or for more information:E-mail [email protected] (+ 1) 617-627-3453

TUFTS UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS 7294 7/06

87716 7/24/06 9:10 AM Page FC2

strengthening the civic roles and social responsibilities of

Documents