strengthening credible evidence to nurture a national research agenda for technology in education...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for
Technology in Education
PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat IIWashington D.C., USA
Sept. 19, 2003
Gerald Knezek
Professor of Technology & Cognition
University of North Texas
![Page 2: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Some Perspectives• Lederman (2003) What works: A commentary on the nature
of scientific research– “…it is clear that those chanting the ‘what works’ mantra are as confused as the general
public and K-12 students about the meaning of scientific research.” (p. 4)• Kemeny (1959) A Philosopher Looks at Science
– Three major stages of scientific method:• Theory formation• Deduction of consequences• Verification of predictions (p. 247)
– “The most characteristic feature of science is its method” • Fulton et. Al (1995) Teachers and Technology: Making the
Connection– “With 40,000 participants and a 1993 average of 100,000 log-ons per month, the Texas
Education Network (TENET) is among the largest and most successful state efforts to open the world of telecommunications technology to teachers.” (p. 116)
![Page 3: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Foundation to Build From: Dissertation Studies
• Christensen: Teacher Integration Training => Positive Student IT Attitudes
Christensen, R. (2002). Impact of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34 (4), 411-434.
• Hopson: Technology Enriched Middle School Group > Comparison Group in Problem SolvingHopson, M., Simms, R., & Knezek, G. (2002). Effects of a technology enriched learning environment on student development of higher order thinking skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34(2), 109-119.
• For others see: Knezek & Christensen (2002). Impact of New Information Technologies on
Teachers and Students. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 369-376.
![Page 4: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Federal Projects: Suggested Build-on Approach
• Look across:– similar projects within a program (replication)– programs for similar findings (meta-analysis)
• Examine longitudinal (multi-year) impact• Add research agenda to program
evaluation– Consider reversing perspective
• projects as ‘guinea pigs’ for strong research designs– Researchers/evaluators could be lead PIs
• Find strong comparison group– Matched pairs OK if random selection not possible
![Page 5: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Areas of Research NeedsRoblyer & Knezek (2003). New Millenium Research for Educational Technology:
A Call for a National Research Agenda. JRTE, 36(1). 1. Research to Establish Relative Advantage
• Doty, Popplewell, and Byers (2002) - reading via interactive storybooks
2. Research to improve technology implementation methods
• Roblyer And Marshall (2002-2003) - instrument to predict students’ success in Virtual High School courses
3. Research to monitor technology’s impact on societal goals
• Chisholm, Carey, and Hernandez (2002) - uses of IT by students of various ethnic backgrounds
4. Studies that help us shape desired directions• Harris and Jones (1999) - communication patterns of online mentoring
![Page 6: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Area 2: Teacher Stage of Adoption vs. Home Access 2001(SITE 2003 Research Award)
Stages and Home Computer Access
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5 Stage 6
No Home Comp
Home Comp
![Page 7: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Area 3: Trends in Computer Enjoyment - 2001 sample (Girls & Computers, NECC 2003)
Computer Enjoyment 2001
3.25
3.3
3.35
3.4
3.45
3.5
3.55
Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
Male
Female
Linear (Female)
![Page 8: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Area 4: Attitudes Toward School - Maine Learning
Technology Initiative (MLTI) 7th Graders 2003 (unpublished)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Att. To
ward
Scho
ol -
M
![Page 9: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Why are These Types of Research Important?
• Efficient use of public funds• Preservation of national economy• Improving quality of life• Monitoring long term impact on
society
![Page 10: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
New AERA SIG
• TACTL (Technology as an Agent for Change in Teaching & Learning)
• First full year: 100 members strong• 2003: Focused on PT3 outcomes - Chicago• 2004: 41 proposals submitted - San Diego
– 88 reviewers reading 2-5 each now
• Forums at AERA, NECC (SITE, EdMedia?) to build bridges to technology groups
![Page 11: Strengthening Credible Evidence to Nurture a National Research Agenda for Technology in Education PT3 Catalyst Leadership Retreat II Washington D.C., USA](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022072016/56649ef15503460f94c023c2/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
For Further Information
• Research Findings:– http://www.iittl.unt.edu/
• AERA SIG– http://www.iittl.unt.edu/tactl
• G. Knezek– http://courseweb.tac.unt.edu/gknezek