strategic management/ business policy

20
Strategic Management/ Business Policy Game Theory and Strategy Power Point Set 9c

Upload: maya-lamb

Post on 30-Dec-2015

41 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Strategic Management/ Business Policy. Game Theory and Strategy Power Point Set 9c. Game Theory and Strategy. Key Concept: Preemption of Strategically Valuable Assets Access to raw materials (e.g., Alcoa ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Power Point Set 9c

Page 2: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Key Concept: Preemption of Strategically Valuable Assets

Access to raw materials (e.g., Alcoa)

Wal-mart’s rural strategy

Page 3: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Analyzing Competitive Dynamics Commitment Vs. Flexibility

Commitment

Game-theoretic preemption strategy

Flexibility

Real (Strategic) Options Analysis

3

Page 4: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Invisible-Hand Game

Row

Work

Hard

Sh

irk

Work Hard Shirk Column

170

140170

140

130 120

120

130

Page 5: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Assurance Game

Row

Coop

era

teD

efe

ct

Cooperate Defect

Column

170

120170

120

100 110

110

100

Page 6: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Prisoners’ Dilemma Game

Row

Silen

ce

Fin

k

Silence Fink Column

-1

0-1

0

-10 -8

-8

-10

Page 7: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Prisoners’ Dilemma Game

Row Player: Dominant Strategy: FinkColumn Player: Dominant Strategy: Fink

Dominant Strategy (Nash) Equilibrium: (-8, -8)

Note: It is a dilemma since if they both cooperated by remaining silent: (-1, -1).

-1

0-1

0

-10 -8-8

-10

7

Page 8: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

The Prisoners’ Dilemma Game can occur in many contexts:

What is best for an individual may not be best for a division;

What is best for a division may not be best for a firm;

What is best for a firm many not be best for an industry;

What is best for an industry may not be best for a nation; and

What is best for a nation may not be best for the world. 8

Page 9: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Now that we have learned the concept of dominant strategy equilibrium, there is a second important equilibrium concept called a Nash equilibrium.

Note: All dominant strategy equilibrium are Nash equilibrium, but not all Nash equilibrium are dominant strategy equilibrium.

Page 10: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Game with no dominant strategy equilibrium, but a Game with one Nash equilibrium:

Row

Coop

era

teFin

k Cooperate Fink

Column

5

4 1

9

-1 0

0

4

Page 11: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

A cooperative game with conflict

Game with multiple (two) Nash equilibria

Man

Pri

ze F

igh

tB

allet

Prize Fight Ballet Woman

2

-1 1

-5

-5 2

1

-1

Page 12: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Suppose this game were played sequentially?

Would it be better to go first or second?

Man

Pri

ze F

igh

tB

allet

Prize Fight Ballet Woman

2

-1 1

-5

-5 2

1

-1

Page 13: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Would you want to move first or second?

Man

Pri

ze F

igh

tB

allet

Prize Fight Ballet Woman

10

100 20

4

90 30

8

6

Page 14: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Initial Game (played simultaneously)

Air

bu

s

No L

au

nch

Lau

nch

No Launch Launch Boeing

400

400300

300

200 -100

-200

200

Page 15: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

How Can “Commitment” Affect A Competitor’s Response?

Commitment = An Irreversible Action (Sunk Costs)

Competition In The Commercial Aircraft Industry

Air

bu

s

No L

au

nch

Lau

nch

No Launch Launch Boeing

400

400300

300

200 -100

-200

200

Page 16: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy:

Lessons #1

1. Commitment (sunk costs) can be used to achieve competitive advantage.

• Preemption strategy

• Note: It is important to communicate the commitment to competitors.

16

Page 17: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Joint Venture

GM Coop

era

teL.

Race

Cooperate L. Race Toyota

112

123112

123

58 91

91

58

Page 18: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

How Can “Commitment” Affect A Competitor’s Response?

Commitment = An Irreversible Action (Sunk Costs)

GM Coop

era

teL.

Race

Cooperate L. Race Toyota

112

123112

-28

58 91

-51

58

Page 19: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

How Can “Commitment” Affect A Competitor’s Response?

Mutual sunk cost commitments

GM Coopera

teL.

Race

Cooperate L. Race Toyota

112

-28112

-28

58 -51

-51

58

Page 20: Strategic Management/ Business Policy

Game Theory and Strategy

Lessons #2:

2. Commitment (sunk costs) can be used to achieve cooperation.

The importance of mutual economic hostages: The wise manager should think beyond Machiavelli’s myopic approach to contracting and should seek both to give and receive credible (sunk cost) commitments that facilitate ongoing relationships and adaptation.

20