strain rate testing of syntactic foamengineering.nyu.edu/mechatronics/smart/pdf/smart... · static...

40
Analysis of PVC Foam and Carbon Nanofiber Syntactic Foam Dr. Nikhil Gupta Ronald Poveda Dzung Luong Jozef Pistek Greg Sciame July/August 2010 S cience and M echatronics A ided R esearch for T eachers Sponsored by the National Science Foundation

Upload: others

Post on 11-Oct-2020

7 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Analysis of PVC Foam and Carbon Nanofiber Syntactic Foam

    Dr. Nikhil GuptaRonald PovedaDzung Luong

    Jozef PistekGreg SciameJuly/August 2010Science and Mechatronics Aided Research for TeachersSponsored by the National Science Foundation

  • Objective• Study, analyze and compare:▫ PVC foams▫ Syntactic foams with 1% Carbon nanofiber

    • Test all materials using both static and dynamic tests

    • Compare the yield strength, plateau strength, and elastic modulus across each foam type and experiment type.

    • To convey test methods, instrumentations, and protocols for analysis

  • Testing and Comparing Two Foam Types

    PVC Foam 1% CNF Syntactic Foam

  • PVC Foam• Lightweight• Chemically-resistant; easy to

    clean• Does not absorb water• Can be stapled and screwed

    into; ideal for marine upholstery and structural applications

    • Forms, cuts and glues easily • Excellent insulator• Weathers well

  • Syntactic Foam

    • Porous composite materials• Hollow glass microballoons

    mixed with a hardening agent

    • High elastic modulus, strength, and energy absorption

    • Low moisture absorption• Strength, lightweight, and

    energy absorption lead syntactic foams to applications in aerospace and marine vehicles

  • 1% Carbon Nanofiber Syntactic Foam

    • For this study, carbon nanofibers (CNF) were added to the syntactic foam mixture during production

    • CNFs have high strength and modulus• This study will analyze whether the addition of

    CNFs will improve the strength of syntactic foams

  • Specimen Preparation

  • Test Specimens

    PVC FoamCarbon Nanofiber Syntactic Foam

    10mm

    5mm

  • Strain and Strain Rate

    • Strain is defined as the ratio of change in the length of a mechanical test sample

    • Strain rate (/s)is defined as the rate of change of strain with respect to time, t.

    hh∆

    =εhΔh

  • Modulus of Elasticity• The ratio of stress to strain (the measure of

    resistance to elastic deformation).• Stress is a measure of the average force per

    unit area.• E = Elastic Modulus = stress / strain• Units: ▫ Elastic Modulus (Pa) ▫ σ: Stress (Pa) ▫ ϵ: Strain (mm / mm)

    ϵ

    σ

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Str

    ess

    (M

    Pa

    )

    Strain (mm/mm)

    Yield Strength• The stress at which material strain changes from

    elastic deformation to plastic deformation, causing it to deform permanently.

    Plateau Strength

    Elastic (Recoverable) Region Plastic Region

    Yield Strength

  • Quasi-Static Compression Testing

  • PVC Foam Quasi-Static Comparison

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

    Str

    ess

    (MP

    a)

    Strain (mm/mm)

    HP 250

    HP 200

    HP 100

    HP 60

  • CNF Syntactic Foam Quasi-Static Comparison

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

    Str

    ess

    (MP

    a)

    Strain (mm/mm)

    CNF 220-30CNF 220-50CNF 460-30CNF 460-50CNF EpoxyEpoxy (Neat)

    220-50

    CNF Epoxy

    Epoxy (Neat)

    220-30

    460-50

    460-30

  • The split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus used in high strain rate testing of materials.

  • SHPB capable of testing materials in high stress at extremely higher strain rates• The split-Hopkinson

    pressure bar is capable of achieving the highest uniform uniaxial stress loading of a specimen in compression at nominally constant strain rates of the order of 10³ /s

  • Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Setup and Data Acquisition

  • High Speed Image Acquisition System

  • Strain Gauge

  • Strain Gauge

    Gauge Factor:

    • ΔR is the change in resistance due to strain.

    • RG is the resistance of the undeformed gauge.

    • ϵ is strain.

    • BV is the bridge excitation voltage.

    GF =ΔR/RGϵ v =

    BV · GF · ϵ4

    Wheatstone Bridge

    Output (v) from the bridge:

  • Amplifier Oscilloscope

  • 0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Str

    ess

    (M

    Pa

    )

    Strain (mm/mm)

    2232 /s

    2288 /s

    2415 /s

    2488 /s

    SHPB Dynamic PVC Foam ComparisonHigh Strain Rate, Varying PVC Foam Densities

    HP 100 PVC Foam at Varying Strain Rates

    HP 250

    HP 200

    HP 100

    HP 60

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    Strain (mm/mm)

    2415 /s

    1897 /s

    880 /s

    Str

    ess

    (M

    Pa

    )

  • SHPB Dynamic CNF Foam Comparison

    High Strain Rate, Varying CNF Foam

    CNF460-30 Foam at Varying Strain Rates

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15

    Str

    ess

    (M

    Pa

    )

    Strain (mm/mm)

    1194 /s1336 /s847 /s739 /s876 /s803 /s

    460-30

    220-50

    1% CNF

    Epoxy (Neat)

    220-30

    460-50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15

    Strain (mm/mm)

    677 /s

    818 /s

    1047 /s

    Str

    ess

    (M

    Pa

    )

  • -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    600 1100 1600 2100

    Str

    ain

    (x

    10

    -3

    mm

    /mm

    )

    Time (μs)

    incident transmitted

  • HP 250, 400 psi, strain rate: 2184 /s

  • HP 100, 400 psi, strain rate: 2415 /s

  • HP 200 PVC Foam(6269 fps)

    (400 psi)

    (250 psi)

    (100 psi)

  • HP 200 vs. HP 60 PVC Foam250 pounds per square inch6269 frames per second

    HP 200

    HP 60

  • HP 200 vs. HP 60 PVC Foam400 pounds per square inch6269 frames per second

    HP 200

    HP 60

  • Yield Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Static

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Dynamic

  • Plateau Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Static

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Dynamic

    * * *

  • Elastic Modulus (MPa)

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500

    Static

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    3000

    3500Dynamic

  • Elastic Modulus/Density (MPa/kg/m³)

    0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

    Static

    0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

    Dynamic

  • Results• For Static Testing:▫ Specific Yield Strength (CNF 460-50)▫ Specific Plateau Strength (Epoxy-neat)▫ Specific and Absolute Elastic Modulus (CNF 460-

    30)• Every value tested increased with density for

    PVC Foams• Trend:▫ In all static tests, PVC foam was predictable in

    every category

  • Results• For Dynamic Testing:▫ Specific Yield Strength (CNF 460-50)▫ Specific Plateau* Strength (CNF 460-50)▫ Elastic Modulus (E) specific E: HP-60 absolute E: CNF 460-30

  • For Both Static and Dynamic Tests:

    • Specific Yield Strength:▫ CNF 220-30 higher than CNF 220-50▫ CNF 460-50 higher than CNF 460-30

    • Specific Elastic Modulus:▫ CNF 220-50 higher than CNF 220-30 ▫ CNF 460-30 higher than CNF 460-50

    • PVC Foam predictable in every category except for specific modulus during dynamic SHPB tests

  • Yield Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Static

    0.00

    0.05

    0.10

    0.15

    0.20

    0.25

    Dynamic

  • Elastic Modulus/Density (MPa/kg/m³)

    0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

    Static

    0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.504.004.50

    Dynamic

  • Improvements

    • Tensile testing is recommended to gain a more complete understanding of the physical properties of PVC and CNF Syntactic Foams

    • Repeat compression tests using more specimens per foam type

    • Learning curve a factor in possible flaws in initial data acquisition

  • Acknowledgements • This research is supported by the Research

    Experience for Teachers Site Program of NationalScience Foundation under grant EEC-0807286:Science and Mechatronics Aided Research forTeachers (SMART).

    • Thank you for your support:• Professor Vikram Kapila• Dr. Nikhil Gupta• Ronald Poveda• Dzung Luong• Vasanth Shunmugasamy• Other lab personnel of Mechanical Engineering

    Department of NYU-Poly

    Analysis of PVC Foam and Carbon Nanofiber Syntactic FoamObjectiveTesting and Comparing Two Foam TypesPVC FoamSyntactic Foam1% Carbon Nanofiber Syntactic FoamSpecimen PreparationTest SpecimensStrain and Strain RateModulus of Elasticity �Yield StrengthQuasi-Static Compression TestingPVC Foam Quasi-Static ComparisonCNF Syntactic Foam Quasi-Static ComparisonThe split-Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus used in high strain rate testing of materials. SHPB capable of testing materials in high stress at extremely higher strain ratesSplit Hopkinson Pressure Bar Setup and Data AcquisitionHigh Speed Image Acquisition SystemStrain GaugeStrain GaugeAmplifier OscilloscopeSHPB Dynamic PVC Foam ComparisonSHPB Dynamic CNF Foam ComparisonSlide Number 24HP 250, 400 psi, strain rate: 2184 /sHP 100, 400 psi, strain rate: 2415 /sHP 200 PVC FoamHP 200 vs. HP 60 PVC FoamHP 200 vs. HP 60 PVC FoamYield Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)�Plateau Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)Elastic Modulus (MPa)Elastic Modulus/Density (MPa/kg/m³)ResultsResultsFor Both Static and Dynamic Tests:Yield Strength/Density (MPa/kg/m³)�Elastic Modulus/Density (MPa/kg/m³)ImprovementsAcknowledgements