stp footprint area: coast, humber and vale - nhs … humber and vale - stp area nhs england...

Coast, Humber and Vale - STP area

NHS England Publications Gateway ref:

Neurological

April 2016

Commissioning for Value Where to Look pack Coast, Humber and Vale - STP area

December 2016

2

Contents

• Introduction to your Where to Look pack

• Supporting the STP process

• NHS RightCare and Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT)

• Your data

• Next steps and actions

• Further support and information

• Useful links

• The NHS RightCare programme

• NHS RightCare and Commissioning for Value

Introduction to your Where to Look pack

What’s in this pack?

This pack contains data from the CCG Commissioning for Value Where to Look packs, published in October 2016, collated at STP footprint level.

The data in this pack includes headline opportunities, improvement opportunity tables and slides showing how CCGs in each STP differ from their peers.

An STP opportunity is the sum of all the equivalent opportunities of the CCGs in that area. They do not include negative opportunities or those which are statistically insignificant.

Legal duties

NHS England, Public Health England and CCGs have legal duties under the Health and Social Care Act 2012 with regard to reducing health inequalities; and for promoting equality under the Equality Act 2010.

One of the main focuses for the Commissioning for Value series has always been reducing variation in outcomes. Commissioners should continue to use these packs and the supporting tools to drive local action to reduce inequalities in access to services and in the health outcomes achieved.

Why your STP area should review it

The information contained in this pack is personalised for each STP footprint area and can be used to help support local discussions about prioritisation to improve the value and utilisation of resources.

By using this information each STP area will be able to ensure its plans focus on those opportunities which have the potential to provide the biggest improvements in health outcomes, resource allocation and reducing inequalities.

3

Supporting the STP process

This pack has been created to align with the new Sustainability and Transformation Planning

(STP) process. Local service leaders in every part of England are working together for the first

time on shared plans to transform health and care in the diverse communities they serve.

Commissioning for Value (CfV) supports CCGs and STP footprint areas by providing the most

up to date data available. Expenditure data is from 2015/16. Outcomes data is the latest

available at time of publication. The time period for each pathway on a page indicator is

included on the chart. In addition the key indicators from the seven focus packs (originally

published in April/May 2016) will be refreshed in the CfV online tools in early 2017.

In the meantime, CCGs and local health economies will still be able to use the 2016 focus

packs for further investigations as an indication of what to change. Unless a CCG has taken

action along a particular pathway, their relative position is unlikely to have altered.

4

5

NHS RightCare and Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) NHS RightCare and GIRFT are complementary programmes and should be used together to support the delivery of population healthcare improvement and financial sustainability.

NHS RightCare’s Commissioning for Value workstream supports improvement across systems by focusing on pathways of care from primary prevention to end of life care. Whilst supporting improvement in terms of access to and outcomes from the acute sector, Commissioning for Value has not focused in detail on hospital care. GIRFT provides detailed insight into variation in the acute system in a way that has not been available before. As such NHS RightCare and GIRFT collectively provide clinical improvement insight across the entire health care system. In 2017 NHS RightCare and GIRFT will be working closely together to support STPs and their local health economies. This will begin with a complementary set of analysis on orthopaedic pathways. This pack supports STP thinking on this collective agenda, including by highlighting opportunities for improvement such as by coordinating the reallocation of capacity in the acute

system, something that can only be achieved together. See pages 9 and 10.

Headline opportunity areas for Coast, Humber and Vale

The number in the grey circles below represents how many CCGs within Coast, Humber and Vale share a particular opportunity area out of 6 CCGs within the STPCirculation 5

Gastro-intestinal 5

Cancer 3

Neurological 4

Respiratory 3

Circulation 5

Gastro-intestinal 5

Endocrine 4

Musculoskeletal 4

Cancer 3

Circulation 4

Gastro-intestinal 4

Maternity 4

Respiratory 4

Endocrine 4

Spend & Outcomes Outcomes Spend

These headline lists are based on the contributing CCGs which form the STP. The figure in the grey circle represents the number of times each programme appears in each individual CCG headline list. This is simply the number of CCGs in the STP with a common programme as a headline opportunity. It does not factor in the relative scale of each of the opportunities for this ranking. E.g. an STP with six CCGs may have all six CCGs with a cancer spend opportunity totalling £3m. In this example, cancer would rank above respiratory which appears in the list for five CCGs but has a total opportunity of £4m. This can be explored further in the detailed sections of this pack.

The number in the grey circles below represents how many CCGs within Coast, Humber and Vale share a particular opportunity area out of 6 CCGs within the STP

Headline opportunity areas for Coast, Humber and Vale

6

Spend & Outcomes

Outcomes

Spend

Circulation Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire

Neurological

Cancer

Respiratory

Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire

Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, Hull

East Riding of Yorkshire, North East Lincolnshire, Hull

East Riding of Yorkshire, North Lincolnshire, Hull

Gastro-intestinal

Circulation Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, Hull

Respiratory

Maternity

Endocrine

Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North East Lincolnshire

East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, Hull

Scarborough and Ryedale, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire


Gastro-intestinal

Circulation Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire

Musculoskeletal

Endocrine

Cancer

Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Vale of York, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire


East Riding of Yorkshire, North Lincolnshire, North East Lincolnshire, Hull

Scarborough and Ryedale, East Riding of Yorkshire, Hull

Gastro-intestinal

Which CCGs in Coast, Humber and Vale - STP share headline opportunity areas?

7

16

70

96

4

27

26

21

43

80

3

142

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Trauma and Injuries

Gastro Intestinal

Respiratory

Circulation

Neurological

Cancer

Total Lives Saved

If the CCGs within the STP performed at the average of:

Similar 10 CCGs Best 5 of similar 10 CCGs

A value is only shown where the opportunity is statistically significant

The mortality data presented above uses Primary Care Mortality Database (PCMD) and is from 2012 to 2014. The potential lives saved opportunities are calculated on a yearly basis and are only shown where statistically significant. Lives saved only includes programmes where mortality outcomes have been considered appropria te.

What are the potential lives saved per year?

8

Coordinating the re-allocation of capacity

9

Improving a population healthcare system to become high value and optimal requires significant

change.

It requires change in the practices and perspectives of all of the professions, people and partners

engaged in the system. It requires change in how we engage with individual patients and how we

engage with our local communities, so that we inform and then seek to understand their

perspectives and their preferences. It requires change in how we operate and think about our

organisational structures, plans and asset models. And, most importantly of all, it requires us to

embrace, collectively and individually, the need to make these changes.

Variation data, as contained in the suite of Commissioning for Value packs, highlights that in

every health system in England, there exists a significant volume of overuse alongside significant

underuse. Overuse leads to waste and harm. Underuse leads to a failure to prevent disease and

inequity. Reducing both leads to a better and more sustainable system. In order to do this well,

we must work together to coordinate the re-allocation of capacity from unwarranted activity to

warranted activity, wherever in the system that may be.

Coordinating the re-allocation of capacity

10

The next page highlights the potential overuse in bed days for your STP area, as implied by

variation data for each of your constituent health economies. STP areas are able to use this

information to focus on the opportunity to free up bed capacity, and ask the questions ‘Is this

current bed use adding value?’ and ‘Where might we better use this capacity and resource?’.

In turn this will allow for discussion and consensus to be reached on where beds add more

value if re-allocated for different use. It also allows for discussion and consensus on what

current capacity a system could avoid the need for, if resources were re-allocated for non-bed

use, to deliver optimal clinical pathways and systems. Avoiding the need for capacity, in this

way, is a key component of delivering a sustainable healthcare system.

Fully integrated care is very likely to be a key part of these discussions. Identifying together

‘Where to Look’ and then designing optimal pathways and systems, that is, ‘What to Change’, by

collectively answering the question ‘What would we look like if we were doing the very best for

our population?’, is the optimal means of achieving this.

3,370

5,122

4,774

16,599

5,491

6,817

8,912

1,780

16,102

4,271

8,021

4,192

11,566

9,190

11,338

5,389

1,669

13,076

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000

Genito Urinary

Trauma and Injuries

Musculo Skeletal

Gastro Intestinal

Respiratory

Circulation

Neurological

Endocrine, nutritional & metabolic

Cancer

Bed Days


Similar 10 CCGs Lowest 5 of similar 10 CCGs


How different are we on bed days?

The bed days data presented above uses Secondary User Services Extract Mart (SUS SEM) and is from financial year 2015/16.

The calculations in this slide are based on admissions for any primary diagnoses that fall under the listed conditions (based on Programme Budgeting classifications which are in turn based on the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases). This only includes admissions covered by the mandatory payment by results tariff and includes NHS England Direct Commissioning activity. These figures are a combination of elective and non -elective admissions. Length of stay is derived from admission and discharge date. Spells that have the same admission and discharge date (includin g planned day cases) have a length of stay in SUS as zero. These have been recoded as a length of stay of 1 day in order to capture the impact of these admissions on total bed days for a CCGs. 11

344

557

7,305

1,936

1,257

3,261

189

1,619

477

5,883

1,676

418

1,938

1,271

257

1,228

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000

Genito Urinary

Trauma and Injuries

Musculo Skeletal

Gastro Intestinal

Respiratory

Circulation

Neurological


Cancer

Total Difference (£000s)




How different are we on spend on elective admissions?

The spend data presented above uses Secondary User Services Extract Mart (SUS SEM) and is from financial year 2015/16.

The calculations in this slide are based on expenditure on admissions for any primary diagnoses that fall under the listed co nditions (based on Programme Budgeting classifications which are in turn based on the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases). This only includes expenditure on admissions covered by the mandatory payment by results tariff and includes NHS England Direct Commissioning expenditure.

CCGs can explore this expenditure in more detail using the Commissioning for Value Focus Packs. For example, Neurological expenditure contains Chronic Pain, and the focus pack breaks this down by different types of Pain. CCGs should consider whether these admissions should be considered alongside other programmes e.g. CVD, Gastrointestinal, Musculoskeletal problems 12

448

1,204

481

3,111

339

2,072

1,478

256

2,446

453

2,390

719

2,494

2,245

2,309

1,382

208

1,058

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000

Genito Urinary

Trauma and Injuries

Musculo Skeletal

Gastro Intestinal

Respiratory

Circulation

Neurological


Cancer


Similar 10 CCGs Best 5 of similar 10 CCGs

If the CCGs within the STP performed at the average of: A value is only shown where the opportunity is statistically significant

How different are we on spend on non-elective admissions?

The spend data presented above uses Secondary User Services Extract Mart (SUS SEM) and is from financial year 2015/16.

The calculations in this slide are based on expenditure on admissions for any primary diagnoses that fall under the listed co nditions (based on Programme Budgeting classifications which are in turn based on the World Health Organisation’s International Classification of Diseases). This only includes expenditure on admissions covered by the mandatory payment by results tariff and includes NHS England Direct Commissioning expenditure.

CCGs can explore this expenditure in more detail using the Commissioning for Value Focus Packs. For example, Neurological expenditure contains Chronic Pain, and the focus pack breaks this down by different types of Pain. CCGs should consider whether these admissions should be considered alongside other programmes e.g. CVD, Gastrointestinal, Musculoskeletal problems 13

326

110

917

1,399

1,081

1,701

371

7

3,647

1,011

646

360

1,001

1,197

1,693

1,729

2,113

576

2,384

974

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000

Genito Urinary

Trauma and Injuries

Musculo Skeletal

Gastro Intestinal

Respiratory

Circulation

Neurological

Mental Health Problems


Cancer



If the CCGs within the STP performed at the average of: A value is only shown where the opportunity is statistically significant

How different are we on spend on primary care prescribing?

The prescribing data presented above uses Net Ingredient Cost (NIC) from ePact.com provided by the NHS Business Services Auth ority and is from financial year 2015/16. Each individual BNF chemical is mapped to a Programme Budget Category and aggregated to form a programme total. The indicators ha ve been standardised using the ASTRO-PU weightings. Opportunities have been shown to the CCGs similar 10 and the lowest 5 CCGs. Prescribing opportunities are for local interpret ation and should be viewed in conjunction with the individual disease pathways.

More detailed analyses of prescribing data, outlier practices, and time trends can be produced rapidly using the following re source: http://www.OpenPrescribing.net 14

Disease Area Spend £000 Quality

No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.

Cancer & Tumours

• Spend on elective and day-case admissions

• Spend on non-elective admissions

• Spend on primary care prescribing

1,228

3,504

1,986

• Cancer and Tumours - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from all cancers under 75 years

• Breast cancer screening

• % first definitive treatment within 2 months (all cancer)

• Breast cancer detected at an early stage

• Bowel cancer screening

• Lower GI cancer detected at an early stage

• Mortality from colorectal cancer under 75 years

• Successful quitters, 16+

• Mortality from lung cancer under 75 years

• Mortality from all cancers all ages

29,178

169

6,732

91

46

1,325

56

14

2,450

100

228

This table presents opportunities for quality improvement and spend differences for a range of programme areas. These are based on comparing the CCGs within Coast, Humber and Vale

STP to the best / lowest 5 CCGs. A quantified unit is only shown when the opportunity is statistically significant.

Improvement opportunities

15


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Circulation Problems (CVD)




3,195

4,381

3,430

• Circulation - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from all circulatory diseases under 75 years

• Reported to estimated prevalence of CHD

• Reported to estimated prevalence of hypertension

• Patients with CHD whose BP < 150/90

• Patients with CHD whose cholesterol < 5 mmol/l

• Patients with hypertension whose BP < 150/90

• Mortality from CHD under 75 years

• Mortality from acute MI under 75 years

• Patients with stroke/TIA whose BP < 150/90

• % stroke/TIA patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant

• Stroke patients spending 90% of their time on stroke unit

• Emergency readmissions within 28 days for stroke patients

• % patients returning home after treatment

• Mortality from stroke under 75 years

• High-risk AF patients on anticoagulation therapy

• Reported to estimated prevalence of AF

• Patients who go direct to a stroke unit (quarter)

• Stroke patients treated by early supported discharge team (quarter)

18,155

176

2,852

9,851

1,297

4,003

5,144

139

88

599

167

17

9

170

30

616

1,806

60

153

Endocrine, Nutritional and

Metabolic Problems




447

463

6,031

• Endocrine - Rate of bed days

• % diabetes patients whose cholesterol < 5 mmol/l

• % diabetes patients whose HbA1c is <59 mmol/mol

• % diabetes patients whose blood pressure is <140/80

• % of diabetes patients receiving all three treatment targets

• % patients receiving foot examination

• Retinal screening

• % diabetes patients attending structured education

3,449

2,974

2,676

3,108

2,482

1,448

931

559

16


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Gastrointestinal




3,612

5,605

2,596

• Gastro - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from gastrointestinal disease under 75 years

• Mortality for liver disease under 75 years

• % 6+ week waits for a gastroscopy (4 month snapshots)

• Alcohol specific hospital admissions

• Emergency admissions for alcoholic liver disease condition (19+)

• Rate of emergency gastroscopies

• Emergency admissions for Upper GI bleeds

• Emergency admissions for Peptic Ulcerations

• Reported Clostridium difficile cases

• % of hemorrhoid surgeries which are day cases

• % 6+ week waits for a colonoscopy (4 month snapshots)

• Rate of emergency colonoscopies

• Emergency admissions for diverticular disease

• Emergency admissions for gastroenteritis (0-4)

• Emergency admissions for gastroenteritis (5+)

28,165

37

24

206

225

28

449

197

122

53

55

52

21

183

233

342

Genitourinary




1,962

900

972

• Genitourinary - Rate of bed days

• Reported to estimated prevalence of CKD

• Patients on CKD register with a BP of 140/85 or less

• Patients on CKD register treated with an ACE-1 or ARB

• Creatinine ratio test used in last 12 months

• % of patients on RRT who have a transplant

7,641

4,068

1,578

52

1,107

26

17


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Maternity & Reproductive Health

• % of delivery episodes where mother is <18

• Flu vaccine take-up by pregnant women

• Smoking at time of delivery

• Live and still births <2500 grams

• Breastfeeding initiation (first 48 hrs)

• Emergency gastroenteritis admissions rate for <1s

• Emergency LRTI admissions rate for <1s

• % receiving 3 doses of 5-in-1 vaccine by age 2

• A&E attendance rate for <5s

• Emergency admissions rate for <5s

• Unintentional & deliberate injury admissions for <5s

• % of children aged 4-5 who are overweight or obese

• Hospital admissions for dental caries (1-4 years)

• Neonatal Mortality and Stillbirths

• % receiving 1 dose of MMR vaccine by age 2

53

1,402

644

28

315

30

92

92

6,891

1,112

85

190

132

32

176

Mental Health Problems (all)

• Spend on primary care prescribing 583 • People with mental illness and or disability in settled accomodation 716

18


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Mental Health Problems (common)

• New cases of depression which have been reviewed

• Assessment of severity of depression at outset

• IAPT referrals with a wait <28days (quarter)

• Completion of IAPT treatment (quarter)

• IAPT: % referrals with outcome measured (6 months)

• IAPT: % 'moving to recovery' rate (quarter)

• IAPT: % achieving 'reliable improvement' (quarter)

• Emergency hospital admissions for self harm

• IAPT: % waiting <6 weeks for first treatment (6 month snapshots)

1,041

779

1,605

1,290

78

223

163

267

2,900

Mental Health Problems (severe)

• Physical health checks for patients with SMI

• % Service users on CPA (end of quarter snapshot)

• Mental health hospital admissions

• People subject to mental health act (quarter)

• People on CPA in employment (end of quarter snapshot)

• Excess under 75 mortality rate in adults with serious mental illness

• % adults on CPA in settled accommodation (end of quarter snapshot)

• % of EIP referrals waiting >2 wks to start treatment (Incomplete) (5m)

• % of EIP referrals waiting <2 wks to start treatment (Complete) (5m)

823

4,338

424

119

42

96

183

22

11

19


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Mental Health Problems

(dementia)

• Mortality with dementia, 65+

• % dementia deaths in usual place of residence (65+)

• % short stay emergency admissions aged 65+ with dementia

• % new dementa diagnosis with blood test

• Dementia diagnosis rate (65+)

• Rate of emergency admissions aged 65+ with dementia

• % of dementia patients with care reviewed

133

61

100

60

1,424

847

380

Musculoskeletal System Problems

(Excludes Trauma)




• Spend on admissions relating to fractures where a fall occurred

13,188

1,199

1,918

1,331

• MSK - Rate of bed days

• % osteoporosis patients 50-74 treated with Bone Sparing Agent

• % patients 75+ years with fragility fracture treated with BSA

• Hip replacement, EQ-5D Index, average health gain

• Knee replacement, EQ-5D Index, average health gain

• Hip replacement emergency readmissions 28 days

• Hip fractures in people aged 65+

• Hip fractures in people aged 65-79


• % fractured femur patients returning home within 28 days

8,966

17

73

313

285

6

64

19

18

39

Neurological System Problems




4,531

2,860

2,484

• Neurological - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from epilepsy under 75 years

• Emergency admission rate for children with epilepsy aged 0–17 years

• Patients with epilepsy on drug treatment and convulsion free, 18+

14,301

8

189

704

20

Note: ‘Spend on admissions relating to fractures where a fall occurred’ is a sub-set of Trauma and Injuries non-elective spend and is not included in the spend for overall MSK non-elective admissions. This indicator as well as ‘Rates of hip fractures’, ‘Emergency readmissions to hospital within 28 days for patients: hip fractures’ and ‘% patients returning to usual place of residence following hospital treatment for fractured femur’ appear in the quality section of the improvement opportunities table for both Trauma & Injuries and MSK table. This is due to it being in the Trauma & Injury pathway as well as the Osteoporosis pathway. Opportunities for these five indicators have only contributed to the headline; ‘Spend’, ‘Outcomes’ (and hence ‘Spend and Outcomes’) for MSK only.


No. of

patients,

life-years,

referrals, etc.




Respiratory System Problems




418

2,584

2,774

• Respiratory - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from bronchitis, emphysema and COPD under 75 years

• Mortality from asthma all ages

• Reported to estimated prevalence of COPD

• % of COPD patients with a record of FEV1

• % of COPD patients with review (12 months)

• % patients (8yrs+) with asthma (variability or reversibility)

• % asthma patients with review (12 months)

• Emergency admission rate for children with asthma, 0-19yrs

• % of COPD patients with a diagnosis confirmed by spirometry

14,680

98

16

6,139

1,109

1,112

491

2,109

48

470

Trauma & Injuries




• Spend on admissions relating to fractures where a fall occurred

1,034

3,594

469

1,331

• Trauma and injuries - Rate of bed days

• Mortality from accidents all ages

• Injuries due to falls in people aged 65+

• Unintentional and deliberate injury admissions, 0-24yrs

• All fracture admissions in people aged 65+


• Hip fractures in people aged 65-79


• % fractured femur patients returning home within 28 days

13,142

26

762

185

439

64

19

18

39

21

How to read your STP pathways

22

The following slides provide a more detailed look at 19

'Pathways on a page' for each CCG within the STP.

The intention of these pathways is not to provide a

definitive view, but to help commissioners explore potential

opportunities. These slides help to understand how

performance in one part of the pathway may affect

outcomes further along the pathway.

Each row in the matrix represents a CCG in your STP

area and how it compares to its similar 10 CCGs across

that pathway. The similar 10 CCGs are not necessarily in

the same STP. These Pathways on a Page allow an STP

to examine which programmes have common

opportunities for several CCGs across the entire pathway,

or for part of a pathway (such as primary care or

detection) for several CCGs. Therefore, STPs may find it

useful to scan the charts both horizontally and vertically.

The key to the right shows how to interpret the coloured

squares and arrows.

The STP opportunities underneath each indicator

name sum the CCG opportunities benchmarked

against the average of the best 5 CCGs, unlike the

coloured squares which benchmark against the

average of the similar 10 CCGs.

Opportunities are calculated for all RAG-rated

indicators except for the stated exceptions.

p CCG is statistically significantly HIGHER

q CCG is statistically significantly LOWER

r CCG HIGHER but not statistically significant

s CCG LOWER but not statistically significant

tu CCG is equal to benchmark

r CCG WORSE/HIGHER but not statistically significant

s CCG WORSE/LOWER but not statistically significant

r CCG BETTER/HIGHER but not statistically significant

s CCG BETTER/LOWER but not statistically significant

tu CCG is equal to benchmark

CCG is statistically significantly WORSE

CCG is statistically significantly BETTER

CCG has no published data for this indicator or value is suppressed due to small

numbers

DeprivationBreast cancer

prevalence

Incidence of

breast cancer

Obesity

prevalence, 16+

Breast cancer

screening

Primary care

prescribing

spend

Urgent GP

referrals (breast

cancer)

% first definitive

treatment within

2 months (all

cancer)

Emergency

presentations for

breast cancer

Elective spend

Breast cancer

detected at an

early stage

<75 Mortality

from breast

cancer

1 year survival

(breast)

2006-2013 2015/16 2013 2012-14 2013 (2011)2015 2010 2012-14 2015/16 2014/15 2015/16 2014/15 2015/16

s q s sp q q q p q

s q r ss s q r r

s s q

s rq p r r p

rsq s q q q

s q rq p p p q q

s q s sq p r p q rp s

p qNorth East

Lincolnshire

Hull

Scarborough and

Ryedale

East Riding of

Yorkshire

Vale of York

North Lincolnshire p r s q

46 Ppl. STP opportunity

(to Best 5)6,732 Ppl. 91 Pats.

Breast cancer pathway

23 Note: We do not calculate potential opportunities for emergency presentations and one-year survival rates owing to missing information in published data.

Deprivation

Colorectal

cancer

prevalence

Incidence of

colorectal cancer

Obesity

prevalence, 16+

Bowel cancer

screening

Urgent GP

referrals

(colorectal

cancer)

% first definitive

treatment within

2 months (all

cancer)

Emergency

presentations for

colorectal cancer

Elective spendNon-elective

spend

Lower GI cancer

detected at an

early stage

<75 Mortality

from colorectal

cancer

1 year survival

(colorectal)

q r qHull p q q

q s q r

s s rq

r s r r

North East

Lincolnshire p

r q r p r r

s s s ss

North Lincolnshire p r

s q q

s

Vale of York q p

p p p s s

p r rr

s s s r s

East Riding of

Yorkshire q r

r p r q r rScarborough and

Ryedale p s

q s

2013 2012-14 2013 (2011)2010 2012-14 2015/16 2014/15 2014/15 2015/162015 2006-2013 2015/16 2015/16

56 Pats. 14 LivesSTP opportunity


Lower gastro-intestinal cancer pathway

24 Note: We do not calculate potential opportunities for emergency presentations and one-year survival rates owing to missing information in published data.

DeprivationLung cancer

prevalence

Incidence of

lung cancer

Smoking

prevalence,

18+

Obesity

prevalence,

16+

Successful

quitters, 16+

Urgent GP

referrals (lung

cancer)

% first definitive

treatment

within 2 months

(all cancer)

Emergency

presentations

for lung cancer


spend

Lung cancer

detected at an

early stage

<75 Mortality

from lung

cancer

1 year survival

(lung)

sp s r qqHull p r q

r r p q rs

r

q r

North East

Lincolnshire p

p p p rq

r q r

North Lincolnshire p r

r s qq

s r

Vale of York q p

p q p sp

q r r sr

q r r r

East Riding of

Yorkshire q p

r s q r rpScarborough and

Ryedale p r

q

2013 2012-14 2013 (2011)2010 2012-14 2015/16 2014/15 2014/15 2015/162015/162015 2006-2013 2015/16 2015/16

£642K 100 LivesSTP opportunity


Lung cancer pathway

25 Note: We do not calculate potential opportunities for emergency presentations and one -year survival rates owing to missing information in published data.

Deprivation

Estimate of

people with a

psychotic

disorder

People with

SMI known to

GPs: % on

register

Primary care

prescribing

spend

Physical

health checks

% of EIP

referrals

waiting <2 wks

to start

treatment

(Complete)

% of EIP

referrals

waiting >2 wks

to start

treatment

(Incomplete)

New cases of

psychosis

served by

Early

Intervention

teams

People treated

by Early

Intervention

Teams

People on

Care

Programme

Approach

% Service

users on CPA

Mental health

hospital

admissions

People subject

to mental

health act

People on

CPA in

employment

% adults on

CPA in settled

accommodatio

n

r s

q s

2012 2015/16

s s

q q

s s sHull p p

r s p p

s rq p p

p

North East

Lincolnshire p

r r p r r

p p s s rp

North Lincolnshire p q

s q

q q

Vale of York q q

s s q q p

q q q s rq s

p s r

East Riding of

Yorkshire q p

s s r s pScarborough and

Ryedale p q

p

2015/16 Q2 2015/16 Q2 2015/16 Q22015/16 2014/15April 2016-

August 2016

April 2016-

August 2016

2015/16 Q4

(Year End)2015/16 Q22015 2015/16 Q4 2015/16 Q4 2014/15

4,338 Pats. 424 Adm. 119 Ppl. 42 Ppl. 183 Ppl.STP opportunity

(to Best 5)823 Pats. 11 Pats. 22 Pats.

Severe mental illness pathway

26

Note: There is variation in the quality of care coordination under CPA, meaning CCGs have not been ranked better/worse than their similar peers for these indicators. However, because it is recommended that more users should be offered CPA support, opportunity figures have been provided for % service users on CPA.

Deprivation% population with

LLTI or disability

Estimated

prevalence of

CMHD (% 16-74

pop)

Depression

prevalence 18+

New cases of

depression which

have been

reviewed

Antidepressant

prescribing

IAPT referrals:

Rate aged 18+

IAPT: Rate

beginning

treatment

IAPT: % waiting

<6 weeks for first

treatment

IAPT: % referrals

with outcome

measured

IAPT: % 'moving

to recovery' rate

IAPT: % achieving

'reliable

improvement'

q

q qHull p q p

s s

North East

Lincolnshire p

q p q

r sq p q


q q s qVale of York q q

q q q

r r

East Riding of

Yorkshire q p

s p r qScarborough and

Ryedale p p

2015/16 Q4 2015/16 Q42011 2014/15 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 Q4

sr

2,900 Pats. 78 Pats. 223 Pats. 163 Pats.

2015 2015/16 Q4Oct 2015 - Mar

2016

Oct 2015 - Mar

2016

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)1,041 Pats.

Common mental health disorders pathway

27 Note: It isn’t possible to robustly calculate an opportunity of number of additional people who should be referred into IAPT.

% physically

inactive adults

Smoking

prevalence, 18+

Hypertension

prevalence, 18+

Dementia

prevalence 65+

Dementia

diagnosis rate

(65+)

% new dementa

diagnosis with

blood test

% dementia

patients with care

reviewed

Ratio of Inpatient

Service Use to

Recorded

Diagnoses

Rate of

emergency

admissions aged

65+ with dementia

% short stay

emergency

admissions aged

65+ with dementia

65+ mortality with

dementia

% dementia

deaths in usual

place of residence

(65+)

r r

r sq r pHull s p q

r

North East

Lincolnshire q

p q s

q s sp s r

North Lincolnshire r p

q q r

s r

Vale of York q s

p s r q

s r ss s

East Riding of

Yorkshire s q

r s sScarborough and

Ryedale p s

2014 20142015/16 2015/16 Sep 2015 Aug 2016 2015/16 2015/16

rs q

847 Adm. 100 Adm. 133 Lives 61 Deaths

2014 2014/15 2014/15 2014/15

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)1,424 Ppl. 60 Pats. 380 Pats.

Dementia pathway

28

CHD

prevalence

Hypertension

prevalence,

18+

Reported to

estimated

prevalence of

CHD

Reported to

estimated

prevalence of

hypertension

Smoking

prevalence,

18+

Obesity

prevalence,

16+

% CHD

patients whose

BP < 150/90

% CHD

patients

cholesterol < 5

mmol/l

% hypertension

patients whose

BP < 150/90

Primary care

prescribing

spend


spend

<75 Mortality

from CHD

<75 Mortality

from acute MI

p qHull q q

s p s

p rq

p p r

North East

Lincolnshire s

p q s

p ps

North Lincolnshire p p

s qVale of York p q

q p

q q

p r r

East Riding of

Yorkshire p p

s s p r rScarborough and

Ryedale p r

p p r

2015/16 2012-14 2012-142015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2013/142015/162015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16

5,144 Pats. £2260K 139 Lives 88 LivesSTP opportunity

(to Best 5)2,852 Ppl. 9,851 Ppl. 1,297 Pats. 4,003 Pats.

Heart Disease pathway

29

Stroke or TIA

Prevalence,

18+

Smoking

prevalence,

18+

Obesity

prevalence,

16+

Reported to

estimated

prevalence

of AF

% stroke/TIA

patients

whose BP <

150/90

% stroke/TIA

patients on

antiplatelet

or

anticoagulan

t

High-risk AF

patients on

anticoagulati

on therapy

Primary care

prescribing

spend

% who go

direct to a

stroke unit

% who

receive

thrombolysis

Patients

90% of time

on stroke

unit

Elective

spend

Non-elective

spend

% treated by

early

supported

discharge

team

Emergency

readmission

s within 28

days

% patients

returning

home after

treatment

<75 Mortality

from stroke

s p r

p s r

p q q r sHull q

r p r

r r rr q

s r s

North East

Lincolnshire p

r p q

q s s s rr

North Lincolnshire s

s p ss q r

p q r

s r s r

Vale of York p s

s p s r r

s rq

s s

East Riding of

Yorkshire r s

p r qScarborough and

Ryedale p r

q p r

2009/10 -

11/122014/15 2012-142015/16 2015/16 2015/16

Jan-Mar

2016

Jan-Mar

20162015/162015/16 2015/16 2015/16

Jan-Mar

20162015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)1,806 Ppl. 599 Pats. 167 Pats. 616 Pats. 60 Pats. 17 Pats. £945K 153 Pats. 9 Adm. 170 Pats. 30 Lives

Stroke pathway

30

Diabetes

prevalence, 17+

Obesity prevalence,

16+

% diabetes patients

cholesterol < 5

mmol/l

% diabetes patients

HbA1c is <59

mmol/mol

% diabetes patients

whose BP < 140/80

% of diabetes

patients receiving

all three treatment

targets

% patients receiving

foot examinationRetinal screening

% diabetes patients

attending structured

education

Primary care

prescribing spendNon-elective spend

rs rHull q q p

p r

North East

Lincolnshire q

r

ps

East Riding of

Yorkshire p p


Scarborough and

Ryedale q p

s p s

Vale of York q q

s s r

q

2015/162015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2014/15 2015/16

qs

559 Pats. £230K

2015/16 2013/14 2015/16 2015/16

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)2,974 Pats. 2,676 Pats. 3,108 Pats. 2,482 Pats. 1,448 Pats. 931 Pats.

Diabetes pathway

31

Reported CKD

prevalence

Reported to

estimated

prevalence of

CKD

% CKD patients

whose BP <

140/85

% on CKD

register with

hypertension &

proteinuria treated

with ACE-I or ARB

Creatinine ratio

test used in last

12 months

Primary care

prescribing spend

Nephrology first

outpatient

attendance rate


spend

Acceptance rate

for renal

replacement

therapy

% home dialysis

undertaken

% of patients on

RRT who have a

transplant

p q

q r rp q qHull q r

s r

North East

Lincolnshire p

s r s p q s

q s s s sr r

North Lincolnshire q s

r p

s s r

Vale of York q s

p q s

r rr q

East Riding of

Yorkshire q s

r pScarborough and

Ryedale q s

2014 20142015/16 2014/15 2014/15 2014/15 2015/16 2014/15

s s rp s

£359K 26 Pats.

2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2012-14

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)4,068 Ppl. 1,578 Pats. 52 Pats. 1,107 Pats.

Renal pathway

32

COPD PrevalenceReported to estimated

prevalence of COPD

Smoking prevalence,

18+

% COPD patients

diagnosis confirmed by

spirometry

% of COPD patients with

a record of FEV1

% of COPD patients with

review (12 months)

Primary care prescribing

spendNon-elective spend

<75 mortality from

bronchitis, emphysema

and COPD

pHull q p

p r q

q

North East

Lincolnshire q

p r

q s

470 Pats.

r

North Lincolnshire q

s r s q rVale of York q s

r

East Riding of

Yorkshire p

s s r q sScarborough and

Ryedale s

p

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)6,139 Ppl. 1,109 Pats. 1,112 Pats. £1955K 98 Lives

2015/16 2015/16 2012-142015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16

COPD pathway

33

Asthma Prevalence% patients (8yrs+) with asthma

(variability or reversibility)

% asthma patients with review

(12 months)Primary care prescribing spend Non-elective spend

Emergency admission rate for

children with asthma, 0-19yrsMortality from asthma all yrs

sNorth East

Lincolnshire s

qHull q r

North Lincolnshire s r

q

Vale of York q

p s r

rScarborough and

Ryedale p r

s pEast Riding of

Yorkshire s

s q s

2015/16

p

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)491 Pats. 2,109 Pats. £104K 48 Adm. 16 Lives

2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2012-14

Asthma pathway

34

Smoking

prevalence,

18+

Obesity

prevalence,

16+

Reported

Clostridium

difficile cases

Rate of

hemorrhoid

surgery

% hemorrhoid

surgeries

which are day

cases

Rate of

colonoscopies

% 6+ week

waits for a

colonoscopy

Primary care

prescribing

spend


spend

Rate of

emergency

colonoscopies

Diverticular

disease -

Emergency

admissions

Gastroenteritis

emergency

admissions (0-

4)

Gastroenteritis

emergency

admissions

(5+)

<75 mortality

from

gastrointestina

l disease

s

q s

2015/162013/14-

2015/16

p r

p r

q qHull p p

s p q p

r r rp

s r r

North East

Lincolnshire p

s r q r

ss

North Lincolnshire p s

r p

q

r r

Vale of York s s

p p p

q r r sq r

r r

East Riding of

Yorkshire q p

p p pScarborough and

Ryedale s s

r s

2015/16 2015/16 2012-142015/16 2015/16 2015/16

2015/16

(Snapshots for 4

months)

2015/16 2015/162015/16 2015/162013/14-

2015/162015/16

233 Adm. 342 Adm. 37 LivesSTP opportunity

(to Best 5)53 Cases 55 Cases 52 Cases £1445K 21 Pats. 183 Adm.

Lower gastro-intestinal pathway

35

Note: Colonoscopies are one of 15 key diagnostic tests which the NHS Constitution states less than 1% of patients should wait more than 6 weeks for. CCGs which achieve good performance compared to their peers may still be missing this target. CCGs are therefore advised to examine their waiting list times in greater detail, which are available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/diagnostics-waiting-times-and-activity/monthly-diagnostics-waiting-times-and-activity/

Smoking

prevalence,

18+

Obesity

prevalence,

16+

Alcohol specific

hospital

admissions

Rate of bariatric

surgery

Rate of

gastroscopies

Rate of

gastroscopies

(<40)

% 6+ week waits

for a gastroscopy

Primary care

prescribing

spend

Elective

spend

Non-elective

spend

Rate of

emergency

gastroscopies

Upper GI

bleeds -

Emergency

admissions

Peptic

ulcerations -

Emergency

admissions

<75 mortality

from

gastrointestinal

disease

p

p

q

q

s

q qHull p qq

r p r q

s s rq s r

r r r

North East

Lincolnshire p

s p p p p

p s rs

North Lincolnshire p

s p p

r r

Vale of York s r

s p p p p

r sp p

r r

East Riding of

Yorkshire q

s p p p pScarborough and

Ryedale s r

r

2015/16 2015/16 2012-142015

(Provisional)2015/16 2015/16 2015/16

2015/16

(Snapshots for 4

months)

2015/162015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2015/162015/16

37 LivesSTP opportunity

(to Best 5)225 Adm. 206 Ppl. £1937K 449 Pats. 197 Adm. 122 Adm.

Upper gastro-intestinal pathway

36

Note: Gastroscopies are one of 15 key diagnostic tests which the NHS Constitution states less than 1% of patients should wait more than 6 weeks for. CCGs which achieve good performance compared to their peers may still be missing this target. CCGs are therefore advised to examine their waiting list times in greater detail, which are available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/diagnostics-waiting-times-and-activity/monthly-diagnostics-waiting-times-and-activity/

Obesity prevalence, 16+Alcohol specific hospital

admissions

Rate added to liver

transplant waiting listLiver transplant rate Non-elective spend

Admissions for hep C

related end-stage liver

disease/HCC

Alcoholic liver disease -

Emergency admissionsLiver cancer incidence

<75 mortality from liver

disease

s sHull q q

ss r r r s r

rr r

North East

Lincolnshire s

s s r r

q p

q s

s

North Lincolnshire q

r r r p s rVale of York q r

r

East Riding of

Yorkshire p

r s r rScarborough and

Ryedale p r

ss r

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)225 Adm. £207K 28 Adm. 24 Lives

2015/16 2012-14 2012-142015 (Provisional) 2011/12-2015/16 2011/12-2015/16 2015/16 2013/14-2015/16 2015/16

Liver disease pathway

37

Note: Many cases of liver cancer are linked to cirrhosis. Cirrhosis is commonly caused by heavy and harmful drinking, hepatit is C and the build-up of fat inside the tissue of the liver. Liver cancer incidence is therefore related to a number of other indicators in the pathway, meaning CCGs have been rat ed better/worse than their similar peers. However, to be consistent with other cancer incidence indicators, a quantified opportunity figure has not been provided.

GP registered

pop >75

Rate of DEXA

scan activity

Primary care

prescribing

spend -

bisphosphonat

es

Hip fractures

in people aged

65+

Hip fractures

in people aged

65-79

Hip fractures

in people aged

80+

Mean length of

stay for hip

fractures

Mean length of

stay for hip

fractures 65+


spend

Spend on

fracture

admissions

after a fall

occurred

% fractured

femur patients

returning

home within

28 days

Hip fracture

emergency

readmissions

28 days

%

osteoporosis

patients 50-74

treated with

Bone Sparing

Agent

% patients 75+

years with

fragility

fracture

treated with

BSA

q q

q q

2013/14 2015

p p

s q

r q qHull q r

r s q q r

r s sq s

s r r r

North East

Lincolnshire r

r s q q s s

r s r s s rr

North Lincolnshire s r

r s p p

q q

s s

Vale of York q s

r s q q p s

q q s r sp r

r r s s

East Riding of

Yorkshire p

r s s s p rScarborough and

Ryedale p r

r r

2014/15 2015/16 2015/162013/14-

2015/16

2013/14-

2015/16

2013/14-

2015/162015/16 2015/16 2015/162014/15 2015/16 2015/16 2014/15

£278K £1331K 39 Pats. 17 Pats. 73 Pats.STP opportunity

(to Best 5)64 Adm. 19 Adm. 18 Adm.

Osteoporosis and fragility fractures pathway

38

% people (over

45) who have

hip

osteoarthritis

(total)

% people (over

45) who have

knee

osteoarthritis

(total)

% people (over

45) who have

hip

osteoarthritis

(severe)

% people (over

45) who have

knee

osteoarthritis

(severe)

Rate of hip

replacements

Rate of knee

replacements

Primary care

prescribing

spend

Pre-treatment

EQ-5D Index

(hips)

Pre-treatment

EQ-5D Index

(knees)


spend

EQ-5D Index

health gain

(hips)

EQ-5D Index

health gain

(knees)

Hip

replacement

emergency

readmissions

28 days

r

s

r

r

r

p s qHull r r rr

r r r q p

sp r p

q s

North East

Lincolnshire r

r s q p p s

s q s s rr

North Lincolnshire r r

s p r q

s

Vale of York s s

s p p p p p

p rp p

p r r s

East Riding of

Yorkshire s s

r p r p q sScarborough and

Ryedale r r

p r s

2014/15 2014/15 2009/10 - 11/122012/13 2012/13 2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2014/152012/13 2014/15 2015/16 2015/162012/13

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)£337K 313 QALYs 285 QALYs 6 Adm.

Osteoarthritis pathway

39

Injuries due to

falls in people

aged 65+

Unintentional and

deliberate injury

admissions, 0-

24yrs

All fracture

admissions in

people aged 65+

Hip fractures in

people aged 65+

Hip fractures in

people aged 65-

79

Hip fractures in

people aged 80+

Primary care

prescribing spendElective spend

Non-elective

spend

% fractured femur

patients returning

home within 28

days

Hip fracture

emergency

readmissions 28

days

Mortality from

accidents all yrs

r s q

r s sr r q qHull s r

s r r

North East

Lincolnshire

r r s p q

p r r s rs r

North Lincolnshire

r s r s

r s

Vale of York s

r r s q q

s r rp p

East Riding of

Yorkshire s s

s r r sScarborough and

Ryedale s

2014/15 2012-142012/13 2015/16 2013/14-2015/16 2013/14-2015/16 2013/14-2015/16 2015/16

s r sp r

£3594K 39 Pats. 26 Lives

2015/16 2015/16 2015/16 2014/15

STP opportunity

(to Best 5)762 Adm. 185 Adm. 439 Ppl. 64 Adm. 19 Adm. 18 Adm.

Trauma and injury pathway

40

% of delivery

episodes

where mother

is <18

Flu vaccine

take-up by

pregnant

women

Smoking at

time of

delivery

% of low

birthweight

babies

(<2500g)

Breastfeeding

initiation (first

48 hrs)

Neonatal

Mortality and

Stillbirths

Infant

mortality rate

Emergency

gastroenteriti

s admissions

rate for <1s

Emergency

LRTI

admissions

rate for <1s

% receiving 3

doses of 5-in-

1 vaccine by

age 2

A&E

attendance

rate for <5s

Emergency

admissions

rate for <5s

Unintentional

& deliberate

injury

admissions

for <5s

% of children

aged 4-5 who

are

overweight or

obese

% receiving 1

dose of MMR

vaccine by

age 2

Hospital

admissions

for dental

caries (1-4

yrs)

s

r

s sHull r r

r s

vw sr

s s

North East

Lincolnshire

r s s s r sNorth Lincolnshire r s

r s r rs s

r

s s

Vale of York s

s s s s r

r s sr

r r s

East Riding of

Yorkshire r

s r r r rScarborough and

Ryedale r

r s

2012/13 -

2014/152014/15

2012/13 -

14/152014/15 2013 2012-14 2014/15 2014/15 2014/152014/15 2014/15 2015/16

2010/11 -

2014/152015/16 2014/15 2010-14

92 Adm. 92 Cases 6,891 Pats. 1,112 Adm. 85 Adm. 190 Cases 176 Cases 132 Adm.STP opportunity

(to Best 5)53 Cases 1,402 Cases 644 Cases 28 Cases 315 Cases 32 Lives 30 Adm.

Maternity and early years pathway

41

Next steps and actions

STP areas can take the following steps now:

• Identify the priority programmes in your locality and compare against current improvement activity and plans

• Look at the focus packs on the NHS RightCare website for those areas which are a priority for your locality

• Engage with clinicians and other local stakeholders, including public health teams in local authorities and commissioning support organisations and explore the priority opportunities further using local data

• Refer to the pages on coordinated re-allocation of capacity and discuss the wider opportunities highlighted in this pack as part of the STP planning process and consider STP wide action

• Revisit the NHS RightCare website regularly as new content, including updates to tools to support the use of the Commissioning for Value packs, is regularly added

• Discuss next steps with your local NHS RightCare Delivery Partner. If you don’t know who your Delivery Partner is, please email [email protected]

42

mailto:[email protected]

42

43

Further support and information

The Commissioning for Value benchmarking tool, explorer tool, full details of all the data used,

and links to other useful tools are available on the NHS RightCare website. Links are shown on

the next page.

The NHS RightCare website also offers resources to support local health economies in adopting

the Commissioning for Value approach. These include:

• Focus packs for the highest spending programmes covered in this pack

• Online videos and ‘how to’ guides

• Case studies with learning from other CCGs

If you have any questions or require any further information or support you can email the

Commissioning for Value support team direct at: [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Useful links

NHS RightCare website: https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare

Commissioning for Value packs and products: https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/intel/cfv/

NHS RightCare casebooks: https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/resources/

Five Year Forward View: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf

NHS shared planning guidance for 2017/18 - 2018/19: https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/futurenhs/deliver-forward-view/

44

https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare

https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/intel/cfv/

https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/intel/cfv/

https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/resources/

https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare/resources/

https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf






https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/futurenhs/deliver-forward-view/






How have the potential opportunities been calculated?

45

The potential opportunity at CCG level highlights the scale of change that would be

achieved if the CCG value moved to the benchmark value of the average of the ‘Best 5’ or

‘Lowest 5’ CCGs in its group of similar 10 CCGs.

Generally, where a high CCG value is considered ‘worse’ then it is calculated using the

formula:

Potential Opportunity = (CCG Value – Benchmark Value) * Denominator

The denominator is the most suitable population data for that indicator eg CCG registered

population, CCG weighted population, CCG patients on disease register etc. The

denominator is also scaled to match the Value. So if the CCG Value and Benchmark Value

are given in “per 1,000 population” then the denominator is expressed in thousands, ie

12,000 becomes 12.

For an indicator, adding the statistically significant opportunities from the CCG packs gives

the opportunity for the STP presented in this pack.

The NHS RightCare programme

The NHS RightCare programme is about improving population-based healthcare, through

focusing on value and reducing unwarranted variation. It includes the Commissioning for Value

packs and tools, the NHS Atlas series, and the work of the Delivery Partners.

The approach has been tested and proven successful in recent years in a number of different

health economies. As a programme it focuses relentlessly on value, increasing quality and

releasing funds for reallocation to address future demand.

NHS England has committed significant funding to rolling out the RightCare approach. All

CCGs are now working with an NHS RightCare Delivery Partner. We have also aligned

Delivery Partners to STP footprints to better support the system.

For more information visit: https://www.england.nhs.uk/rightcare

46

47

NHS RightCare and Commissioning for Value

Commissioning for Value is a partnership between NHS RightCare and Public Health England. It provides

the first phase of the NHS RightCare approach - Where to Look. The approach begins with a review of

indicative data to highlight the top priorities or opportunities for transformation

and improvement.

Value opportunities

exist where a health

economy is an outlier

and will most likely yield

the greatest

improvement to clinical

pathways and policies.

Phases two and three

then move on to

explore What to

Change and How to

Change.

stp footprint area: coast, humber and vale - nhs … humber and vale - stp area nhs england...

Documents