storms, floods, waves and debris: observations and inferences for protection-, risk-, and...

Upload: hrnerr

Post on 02-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    1/20

    DEC 3 rd Fact Finding Meeting:What do we know about storm protection and the role of Piermont Marsh?

    Piermont, Wed Jan 7, 2015

    Storms, Floods, Waves & Debris:Observations and Inferences for

    Protection- , Risk- andMarsh-ManagementDecisions

    Klaus H. JacobLamont-Doherty Earth Observatory &School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University

    [email protected]

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    2/20

    This presentations has three parts:

    I. Relationships between Marsh andStorms/Floods

    II. How these Relationships could change ifsome of the Marsh was going to bemodified.

    III. My personal Comments &Recommendations based on (1) and (2)for pending development of aMarsh Management Plan

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    3/20

    Key Points Re I.) Marsh Effects during Storms

    The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, andthen open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.

    3.5 NAVDx

    3.5 NAVDx

    and applies to ordinaryhigh-tide flooding

    1. Marsh does not diminish the (still-water) flood elevation

    9.7 .1x

    8.9I

    V

    This applies to extreme surgesi.e. Sandy

    USGS SandyHigh-Water

    Marks

    My own.

    9.7x

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    4/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms2. Marsh reduces wave action substantially.

    In Bogertown, neither during Irene nor Sandy any perceptible waves wereobserved In contrast, north of the pier, wave heights were estimated to be at least 2

    to 3 feet during Sandy These findings are supported by theoretical and experimental studies,

    e.g.: USGS study in San Francisco Bay Area:

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    5/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms2. Marsh reduces wave action substantially.

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    6/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms3. Marsh catches debris & reduces risk of impact to houses

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    7/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms

    4. High & dense phragmites works better than lesser plants

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    8/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms

    4. High & dense phragmites works better than lesser plants

    5. This is especially true for very high storm surges. Why?

    Phragmites exceeds height of Flood Crests(even for Sandy)

    The entire water column and wind boundary layerexperiences friction

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    9/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms

    6. The Marsh (even with phragmites) needs to be sufficiently wide

    to catch debris and attenuate wave action.

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    10/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms6. The Marsh (even with phragmites) needs to be sufficiently wide

    to catch debris and attenuate wave action.7. Where it was not, Sandy damaged retaining wall of Condos

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    11/20

    Key Points Re I) Marsh Effects during Storms

    8.Debris and breaking waves seem to flatten the phragmites

    in distinct patterns (but heavy wet snow can too).

    Winter 1969/70

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    12/20

    Key Points ReII) Potential Flood Effects and Risks from Phrag Removal

    1. Marsh looses much of its capacity for wave attenuationand debris protection, probably for a decade or more

    2. The Risk for Marsh Erosion is increased

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    13/20

    Key Points ReII) Potential Flood Effects and Risks from Phrag Removal

    3. If Herbicides were used, high tides could flood them intosome gardens several times a year, and during storms intolow-lying houses , the ball field & 2 childrens playgrounds ,although less often.

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    14/20

    Key Points ReII) Potential Flood Effects and Risks from Phrag Removal4. If Herbicides were used, risks to amphibians and fish(*)

    are likely, and because of transport during floods, risks toflood-exposed residents cannot be ruled out. Recentresearch hints that the risk is highest when e.g. Glypho-sates enter the food chain(**) . This may jeopardize homegardening & fishing (and perhaps usage of play grounds & thevillage ball field ?). Risk not known, but Safety not proven either!!

    * http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/04-1291http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=glyphosate+amphibian&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=glyphosate+fish&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C33&as_sdtp=

    ** Swanson N.L. et al. 2014. J. Organic Systems 9 (2), 6-37, 2014 KHJ: Correlation ! Causation. => Hint!Samsel, A. & S. Seneff 2013. Entropy 2013, 15, 1416-1463. KHJ: Causation through the guts microbiome and other references on request to KHJ.

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    15/20

    - 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

    8 9 1 0

    F e e

    t a b o v e

    M H H W

    Key Points ReII) Potential Flood Effects and Risks from Phrag Removal

    5. Sea Level Rise accelerates & amplifies all of the above.

    My Garden Floods

    Sandy

    IreneDonna 1962Noreaster

    Monthly Flood Extremesat Battery,

    1884-2014

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    16/20

    III. Inferences for Management Plan from I) Marsh Effects during Storms; and II) Phrag Removal

    1. Removal of Phragmites, if at allcontemplated, should be limitedto a small diversity garden in anear-central part of the Marsh. Isuggest the area surrounded bythe oxbow (after infilling theshort-cut channel).

    2. Reason: preserve maximumwave attenuation, debriscatchment, sedimentation, andnutrient cleanup, and avoiderosion. Lesser plants performpoorer protection especiallyduring severe storms. =>Liabilityre home damage & home values.

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    17/20

    III. Inferences for Management Plan

    3. Use freed up resources to consideroyster reefs on E side (outboard) ofthe marsh as breakwaters ==>

    and/or off N Piermont / Marinas.

    Source: Scape / RBD

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    18/20

    5 . No herbicides in Marsh => Flooding => for Public Health& Liability Issues alone.

    6. Use the Cautionary Principle : if you dont understand theprocesses that relate causes to effects, and effects tocauses, or actions to outcomes, then desist acting there-by minimizing possible risks (to marsh, people, life & NYS).

    Also: Justifying actions by Benefit Cost Analyses is ethically/morallyquestionable if potential costs are unacceptable, whatever the benefits.

    Recent Example of Applying the Cautionary Principle :Governors Decision to Sustain Fracking Ban for New York State

    because of Uncertainty in Environmental Risks & Health Hazards

    III. Inferences for Management Plan fromI) Marsh Effects during Storms; and II) Phrag Removal

    => =>-

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    19/20

    Thank you

  • 8/10/2019 Storms, Floods, Waves and Debris: Observations and Inferences for Protection-, Risk-, and Marsh-Management Decisions

    20/20

    2010 (pre-Irene)

    2013

    Post-Sandy

    &Post-Snow

    of Nov 7