stock pitch - duke university investment clubpepsi ceo indra nooyi “stevia, unfortunately, does...
TRANSCRIPT
Stock Pitch
Nikolai Doytchinov, Jonathan Im, Trey Coppinger, Yang Wu, Cheng Ma
2
Table of Contents
I. Investment Thesis
II. The Flavor Industry and the Sweetener Market
I. Flavor Houses
II. Shifting Consumer Preferences
III. Stevia-Based Alternatives
III. Senomyx’s Solution
IV. Company Overview
V. Valuation
I. Investment Thesis
4
Senomyx (NASDAQ: SNMX)
Recommendation: Buy Current Price: $9.05 Price Target: $17.02
Senomyx’s exclusive licensing deal with PepsiCo on a sugar enhancer combines with a unique method of identifying
other flavor molecules to create a compelling investment opportunity.
Imminent introduction of Pepsi product using flavorless sweetener enhancer S617
Consumer dissatisfaction with both sugar and alternative sweeteners
Pristine balance sheet ($30M cash, $0 debt)
CATALYSTS
RISKS
Consumer preferences for full-sugar soft drinks
Skepticism about artificial additives
Uncertainty about success of other experiments
II. The Flavor Industry and the Sweetener Market
Flavor Houses
Flavor Houses
Market Size - $24 billion
Top 10 flavor houses constitute ~80% of the market
Shifting Consumer Preference
Downward trend in sugar consumption
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Driven by:
Obesity and health impacts
Health conscious consumerism
Green companies and brands
Artificial sweeteners and health concerns
CHANGE IN SUGAR CONSUMPTION
Source: Consumption of added sugars is decreasing in the United States Jean A Welsh, Andrea J Sharma, Lisa Grellinger, and Miriam B Vos Am J Clin Nutr 2011 ajcn.018366; First published online July 13, 2011. doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.018366
Shifting Consumer Preference – Artificial Sweeteners
Shifting Consumer Preference - WSJ
Stevia sweetener derivatives
Stevia based alternatives
Made from the leaves of the plant species Stevia rebaudiana
300 times sweeter than sugar
Licorice or bitter aftertaste
Pepsi CEO Indra Nooyi
“Stevia, unfortunately, does not work well in colas.”
III. Senomyx’s Solution
Senomyx – Compound S617
S617 is a sucrose modifier
Allows for 50 - 75% reduction in sucrose usage with no flavor profile change
Lower calories
Lower cost
Beverages
Alcoholic and non-alcoholic
Extremely low concentrations required
10 PPM
14
Firmenich has negotiated first-mover rights
Second largest flavor house in the world
Exclusive until March 2018
PepsiCo
PepsiCo has exclusive rights to use S617 worldwide in all non-alcoholic beverages.
S617 PROPERTIES COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS
Senomyx – Flavor Development Process
15
Assay Development New Potential
Ingredients
Optimization and candidate
selection
Regulatory Approval
Pre-marketing preparation
Sales
Senomyx – Flavor Development Process
16
Strong IP holdings on new flavorings, enhancers and methods for finding them
406 patents thus far awarded
Proprietary assay technologies:
SavoryScreenHT
SweetScreenHT
SaltScreenHT and SaltScreen EP
BitterScreenHT
Automated and fast allowing for screening of millions of different compounds
Guided by research into underlying mechanisms of taste perception
Assay Development New Potential
Ingredients
Optimization and candidate
selection
Senomyx – Additional Flavor Programs
17
SWEET TASTE PROGRAM
S2383 Sucralose modifier
Sweetmyx (S9632)
Similar to S617, also licensed by Firmenich and Pepsi
S6973 Sucrose modifier
SAVORY TASTE PROGRAM
Savorymyx (S807)
New savory flavors S336
S643
BITTER BLOCKER PROGRAM
S6821 Reduce perception of bitter ingredients, e.g. caffeine, Rebaudioside A (stevia) S7958 COOLING TASTE PROGRAM
S2227 Higher potency, longer
duration, improved aroma (under-development)
SALT TASTE PROGRAM
Currently researching salt receptor protein
Senomyx – FEMA GRAS
Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association
SNMX flavors have received Generally Recognized as Safe designation
Passed review by a panel of experts
Recognized as flavoring agents
Potential for similar backlash experienced by “artificial sweetener” products
Mitigated by low required concentrations
Can be called artificial flavors in labelling
REGULATORY AND SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS
Senomyx – FEMA GRAS
PANEL OF EXPERTS
FEMA Expert Panel (left to right): Dr. Steve Hecht, University of Minnesota (2010), Dr. Ivonne Rietjens, Wageningen University (2006), Dr. Sam Cohen, University of Nebraska Medical Center (2002), Dr. Larry Marnett, Vanderbilt University (2000) (Chair), Dr. Nigel Gooderham, Imperial College London (2009), Dr. Shoji Fukushima, Japan Bioassay Research Center (2010), Dr. Robert Smith, Imperial College London (1981)
IV. Company Overview
21
Management Team
Source: Company Website
John Poyhonen (President, CEO) Worked with the company since the
beginning Extensive experience in
pharmaceutical companies, including directing Heron Therapeutics
Tony Roger (SVP, CFO) Worked with the company since the
beginning Extensive experience in finance
positions at biotech companies
Kenneth Simone (VP Supply Chain) 13 years of experience in the food
and flavor industry Previously VP Supply Chain at
Firmenich, world’s #2 flavor house
Donald Karanewsky, PhD (SVP, CSO) Extensive experience directing
research teams and managing biotech institutions
Inventor on 90 issued US patents and authored over 70 publications
David Linemeyer, PhD (VP Biology) 20+ years of experience in directing
biology research programs Inventor on numerous patents and
authored 50 scientific publications
Catherine Tachdijan, PhD (VP Chemistry) 20+ years of experience in directing
research teams in the development of novel molecules
Led to 35 issued patents and scientific publications for Senomyx
22
Catalysts
Source: SEC Filings
GRAS approval of S617; launch of Pepsi product that uses S617
Growing sucrose market
(10% penetration = $2bn profit)
Global Expansion into EU and Middle Eastern countries
Healthy balance sheet: starting 2014 with no debt and $33m in liquid investments
Development of natural sweeteners, salt enhancer, and natural salt replacements
23
Risks and Mitigations
Stock price will be affected by Pepsi-related news
Extremely small chance that the Pepsi deal will fail
Profit from Pepsi deal is small compared to potential profit from direct business
Requirement of “artificial flavor” labeling on the ingredients list might turn consumers away
Studies have shown the most important issue consumers care about in food and drink is taste
Majority of consumers that are eating sugary products already know the products are not good for their health
Adding SNMX products to products that already have artificial flavors on the label would result in zero labeling changes
Products can be marketed as “naturally sweetened” even though artificial flavoring will be included in ingredients list on the back of the packaging
Markets in countries with different labeling laws than the US and the food services industry will not be affected
V. Valuation
25
Valuation (R&D payments + S617 only) ($ in millions, except per share data)
FCF Calculation
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Development revenue 24.7 25.6 26.7 27.7 28.8 30.0 31.2 32.4 33.7 35.1 36.5 38.0
Commericial revenue 4.6 8.0 20.0 30.8 47.6 73.4 113.2 140.5 174.3 216.3 268.4 333.0
Total Revenue 29.3 33.6 46.7 58.6 76.4 103.4 144.4 172.9 208.0 251.4 304.9 371.0
COGS of Commercial Revenue 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.4 4.2 5.2 6.5 8.1 10.0
R&D Expense 28.6 30.6 32.8 35.1 37.5 40.1 42.9 44.7 46.4 48.3 50.2 52.2
SG&A 12.3 13.4 14.6 15.9 17.3 18.9 20.6 22.5 24.5 26.7 29.1 31.7
Total Operating Expenses 41.2 44.2 48.0 51.9 56.3 61.2 66.9 71.3 76.1 81.5 87.4 93.9
Operating Income -11.9 -10.6 -1.3 6.7 20.2 42.2 77.5 101.6 131.9 169.9 217.5 277.0
FCF -11.9 -10.6 -1.3 4.4 13.1 27.4 50.3 66.0 85.7 110.4 141.4 180.1
PV of FCF -11.9 -9.3 -1.0 2.9 7.8 14.2 22.9 26.4 30.1 34.0 38.1 42.6
Share Price Calculation
PV of FCF 2014-2024 225.39
Terminal Value 1854.72
PV of TV 483.52
Shares Outstanding 41.64
Total Equity Value 708.91
Value Per Share 17.02
Key Assumptions
2014-2019 Revenue Growth 54.24%
2019-2024 Revenue Growth 24.09%
Perpetual Growth Rate 3.00%
WACC 13.0%
2014-2019 Revenue Growth Projection
Global CSD Sales 370000
US CSD Sales 77000
PEP CSD as Percent of US 28%
Percent Penetration of PEP 15.00%
Royalty Rate 3.50%
Potential PEP Revenues 113.19