steven pinette geothermal

28
1 Maine Section ASCE 2008 Technical Seminar Lewiston, Maine March 20, 2008 “ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE” MAINE GOETHERMAL ENERGY MAINE GOETHERMAL ENERGY WAITING TO BE TAPPED WAITING TO BE TAPPED AN OVERVIEW AN OVERVIEW Steve Pinette Senior Geologist 207-883-5714 [email protected] Tremendous resource energy consumption greenhouse gases Maine and New England US Military, GSA, Midwestern/Northwestern US and Canada

Upload: pangestu-wibisono

Post on 16-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

geo

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1Maine Section ASCE2008 Technical SeminarLewiston, MaineMarch 20, 2008

    ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE

    MAINE GOETHERMAL ENERGYMAINE GOETHERMAL ENERGYWAITING TO BE TAPPEDWAITING TO BE TAPPED

    AN OVERVIEWAN OVERVIEW

    Steve PinetteSenior [email protected]

    Tremendous resource energy consumption greenhouse gases

    Maine and New England

    US Military, GSA, Midwestern/Northwestern US and Canada

  • 2Heat generated Heat generated from: from:

    1) cooling in the 1) cooling in the earthearths core, and s core, and

    2) radioactive 2) radioactive mineral decaymineral decay

    Heat Heat dissipated dissipated out through out through the mantle the mantle & crust& crust

    to 3,000 oC

    +3,000 to

    7,000 oC

    45-70+ oC

    Big GHigh Temp. Geothermal in areas

    associated with thin crust, volcanoes, rift areas .

  • 3High Temperatures Generated at Plate Boundaries

  • 4Geothermal Heatflow Map of North America, 2004Adapted from Southern Methodist University Geothermal Laboratory

    BIG GLittle g

    How Do We Tap this Heat?How Do We Tap this Heat?

    1. Closed1. Closed--loop systemsloop systems

    2. Standing column wells2. Standing column wells

    3. Slinky systems in soil trenches3. Slinky systems in soil trenches

    4. Open loops, pond loops, 4. Open loops, pond loops, ..

    MOST COMMON

  • 5Closed loop systemClosed loop system no contact between no contact between the water in the pipes and groundwater the water in the pipes and groundwater

    No drawdown of water table No drawdown of water table

    extracts heat onlyextracts heat only

    Typically 300 400 ft. deep; borings 4 5 inches diameter; geo-loop is 1.25 inches diameter HDPE

    200 Ft.

    20 Ft.

    25 Ft.

    4 Ft.

    One heat pump on its own ground loop

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • 6AA

    HDPE geo-loop

    u-tubes in vertical bores.

    Common loop conditioned by vertical ground heat exchanger

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    HDPE loop

    Tremie pipe

    Closed-loop boreholes typically 25 ft. apart; geo-loop being grouted

  • 7DPE Geo-loop pipe generally guaranteed or 50 years)

    DPE lines running from headers to building; several bore holes per header

  • 8Geo-loop entry via pre-fabholes in foundation

    Standing Column Well(typically up to 1500 deep; used mainly in Northeast)

    submersible pump

    perforated intake

    discharge

    sleeve

    Rock formation

    soil

    A Aoptional bleed

    to heat pumps

    ***Groundwater quality is critical to run these systems!!

  • 9Below a depth of about 800, need auxiliary compressor or two rigs running in tandem to provide compressor air capacity to lift drill cuttings up the borehole

    - Without extra compressor, some cuttings remain in the borehole to damage well pumps and other equipment

    pproviding auxiliary air

  • 10

    Ground loops can be vertical or horizontal

    Generally requires 1500-3000 ft2 land area per ton

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Lake

    HDPE Coils withUV Protection inLoose Bundles

    A

    A

    Common loop conditioned by surface water (Closed loop)

    Typically, 15 tons/acre (depth15-20 ft) or as high as 85 tons/acre for well stratified deep lakes

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • 11

    Productionwell pump

    River orother surface

    body

    Optionalinjection

    well

    Plate heat exchangerA

    A

    Open-loop conditioned by groundwaterSpent Water can be discharged to injection well or to

    surface water body no recirculation

    Generally requires wells with flow of 2-3 gpm/ton

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Open-loop conditioned by surface water

    AA

    Plate heat exchanger

    Water intake

    Water dischargePump

    More suited to warm climates, or cooling-only applications

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    ***Not appropriate for State regulated water bodies in Northeast No-discharge farm ponds generally okay

  • 12

    GHP System Options

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Other methods of conditioning a single or common loop:

    Wastewater streams Community loop Potable water supplies (where allowed) Hybrid systems (e.g., partial cooling with a

    chiller during peak periods)

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • 13

    HeatPump

    HeatPump

    HeatPump

    HeatPump

    DPSignal Wire to Drive Transducer

    Variable Speed DrivePump

    PurgeValves

    Aux.Pump

    Interior PipeHeaders

    A

    A

    HeatPump

    Commercial system: multiple GHPs on a common loop

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Heat pumps atGorham Middle School

    Closed loop

    140,000 sf

    ~200 tons

    119 boreholes,

    375 ft. depths

    4.5 dia.

  • 14

    In New England, most of the systems will be closed-loop or standing-column well systems installed in bedrock

    Primary ConcernRock Type and its Thermal Properties

  • 15

    Amount of Heat supplied to boreholesAmount of Heat supplied to boreholes

    FourierFouriers Law s Law

    Q = Q = --kA kA dT/dxdT/dxRate of heat

    Production

    Coefficient of Thermal Conductivity

    Temperature gradient

    Area

    BTU BTU (Q)/hour(Q)/hour

    Thickness = Thickness = 1 inch (dl)1 inch (dl)Differential Differential

    temperature temperature = 1 degree = 1 degree

    (dT)(dT)

    1 foot1 foot

    1 foot1 foot

    Q = k Q = k A A dT/dldT/dl

    Calculate K (thermal conductivity)

  • 16

    Measuring Thermal Conductivity Closed-Loop Borehole

    Q We know how much heat (BTUs) the building will need

    A ?? The area that we need to supply this heat (borehole area how many borings and to what depth?)

    K We can estimate this based on rock type, but there are broad ranges in the same rock type better to better to testtest

    dT/dx (temp. gradient) We can guess, but better to better to testtest

    ***If you use general values, usually end up with conservative design. In one case, testing allowed designer to reduce number of proposed boreholes by 50%.

  • 17

    Required by the system design softwareRequired by the system design software

    Source: GRTI, 2006

    Also need to know Heat Capacity

    The quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of a system by one degree (can obtain standard values for this)

    Need to know this plus the thermal conductivity to calculate diffusivity

  • 18

    Thermal Diffusivity

    Thermal conductivity of a substance divided by the product of its density and heat capacity

    For Standing Column Wells with bleedwe also need to know

    Sustainable Well YieldWell Yield

    ***This is one key reason for system problems***

  • 19

    Broad Range of Thermal Conductivities in Similar/Same Rock Types

    Source: Montan Universitt (www.uniloben.ac.at)

    ThermalThermal Coefficients for Common MaterialsCoefficients for Common MaterialsKK CpCp Diff (Diff ())

    BTU/hrBTU/hr--ftft--ooFF Btu/lbBtu/lbooFF ftft22/day/day

    GraniteGranite 1.51.5--2.12.1 0.210.21 1.01.0--1.41.4MarbleMarble 1.21.2--1.91.9 0.220.22 0.80.8--1.21.2GneissGneiss 1.31.3--2.02.0 0.220.22 0.90.9--1.21.2QuartziteQuartzite 3.03.0--4.04.0 0.200.20 2.22.2--3.03.0SlateSlate 0.90.9--1.51.5 0.220.22 0.60.6--0.90.9SandstoneSandstone 1.21.2--2.02.0 0.240.24 0.70.7--1.21.2LimestoneLimestone 1.41.4--2.22.2 0.220.22 1.01.0--1.41.4Moist SandMoist Sand 1.41.4--1.71.7 ---- 0.80.8--1.0 1.0 Dry SandDry Sand 0.80.8--1.41.4 ---- 0.80.8--1.31.3

  • 20

    Other features that affect heat transfer

    Fractures Fractures Voids in the rock Voids in the rock Water saturationWater saturation

  • 21

  • 22

    Higher Thermal Conductivity if saturated

    with groundwater

    Entering Water Temperature Affects System Efficiency

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

    Entering water temperature (F)

    Hea

    ting

    CO

    P

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Coo

    ling

    EER

    Source: Oak Ridge National Laboratory

    Its not a parameter that we can control, butHigher Temp more efficient for heatingLower Temp more efficient for cooling

    heating cooling

    IncreasingEfficiency

  • 23

    Deep earth (and groundwater) temperatures in the U.S.

    46 (400)

    50.1 (190)

    50.5 (400)47.5(115-135)

    52.9(115-1500)

    64

    Maximum Temperatures (oF)

    48.1 (450)

    48.1 (420)

    48.0 (405)49.8 (400)

    Explanation?

    Off-shore Seamount??

  • 24

    Test Groundwater for Chemical Parameters***Critical for Standing Column Well Systems!!!

    Dissolved Oxygen, Specific Conductivity, pH, TurbidityField Parameters

    Radon, Uranium, Hardness, Alkalinity, Ammonia-N, Ortho-Phosphorous, Dissolved Organic Carbon, Cyanide, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids, Total Coliform Bacteria, Color, Odor, Iron Bacteria

    Other Parameters

    Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Semi-volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)

    Synthetic Organic Compounds

    Br, Cl, F, NH3-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, PO4, SO4Other Ions

    Ag, Al, As, B, Ba, Be, Ca, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, K, Mg, Mn, Mo, Na, Pb, Ni, Sb, Se, Si, Sr, Tl, Ti, V, ZnMetals

    Water Quality and Standing Column Well System

    submersible pump

    perforated intake

    discharge

    sleeve

    Rock formation

    soil

    A ABleed must be clean

  • 25

    COROSION INDICESfor Standing Column Wells only

    Chloride concentration (road salt, paleoseawater, marine environment)

    Calcium Carbonate Saturated pH Langelier Index Aggressive Index Rynzar Stability Index

    Advantages of GHPs

    High efficiency Lower energy consumption & CO2 footprint Lower energy cost

    Low maintenance cost Low life cycle cost No outdoor equipment Greater occupant comfort

  • 26

    ***Less Greenhouse Gas Emissions***

    Note: This takes into account emissions from electric power plant (non-renewables)

    Source: Whitney Engineering, 2008

    So Lower energy consumption Smaller Carbon Footprint

    what about $ Payback period??

  • 27

    CLOSED LOOP (Source: Whitney Engineering)

    PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS GORHAM MIDDLE SCHOOLSq. Ft. 140,000 Heating ~3,000,000 Btu/hr. Feb.

    Cooling ~292 tons cooling in JulyA. Data:

    Cost $/Sq. Ft.Total New Building $11,800,000 84.29Total Mechanical $ 2,419,000 17.28Base HVAC Systems $ 1,831,300 13.08

    Geothermal Field $ 653,900 4.67Boilers, Cooling Tower $ 540,000 3.86

    B. Cost Comparison: Geothermal vs. Conventional HVAC

    Base HVAC Systems $ 1,831,300 $ 1,831,300Geothermal Bid Price $ 653,900 -Conventional Bid Price - $ 540,000Total $ 2,485,200 $ 2,371,300

    C. Extra Cost for Geothermal: $ 113,900 ($0.81/SF)

    ECONOMIC EVALUATION (Source: Whitney Engineering)

    Project: Gorham Middle SchoolSq. Ft. 140,000

    BOREHOLES STANDING(Closed Loop) COLUMN

    WELLS1. Extra Cost for Geothermal $ 113,900 $ 293,0002. Energy Savings $ 40,000 $ 40,000

    3. SIMPLE PAYBACK 2.85 Years 7.3 Years

    Note: Energy savings based on Middle School with conventional Water Source Heat Pump (WSHP)system and Gorham Middle School with geothermal HVAC

    system

  • 28

    Bowdoin College Dorms Standing-Column Well Example

    (Source: Harriman Associates)

    66,000 sf with 180 beds

    Heated/cooled with Standing-Column Well system

    Uses

    seven 1500-foot wells with

    seven 30-ton heat pumps

    2,500 gallon cistern to collect bleed water; this water is used to flush toilets had no place to discharge heat recovery ventilation

    Compared to 2M BTU gas boiler & 150-ton chiller Geothermal system was $515,000 more

    Design Payback 9.6 years Actual Payback 6.2 years

    Closed-Loop vs. Standing-Column Wells

    Closed-Loop Pro In-ground system is robust and durable; little attention after

    installation Pro Existing or future groundwater quality is not a major concern,

    except during drilling Pro - Less/little need for regulatory oversight and permitting Con Higher front costs ($2,600 - $3,000 per ton installed [Harriman]) Con Requires a larger area for bore field

    Standing-Column Wells Pro Lower front costs ($2,400 -$2,800 per ton installed [Harriman]) Pro Can be sited around existing buildings and requires smaller

    footprint Con - Groundwater quality and sand/grit create major problems for

    equipment Con - Requires more DEP oversight and permitting