stereo composition measurement with the high resolution fly’s eye
DESCRIPTION
Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye. J.N. Matthews, G. Archbold, and P. Sokolsky University of Utah For the HiRes collaboration. UHECR Composition Measurement. Measure depth of shower maximum (X max ) using stereo HiRes data. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Stereo Composition Measurement with the
High Resolution Fly’s Eye
J.N. Matthews, G. Archbold, and P. Sokolsky
University of UtahFor the HiRes collaboration
UHECR Composition Measurement• Measure depth of shower maximum (Xmax)
using stereo HiRes data.• Monte Carlo study of Xmax & E resolution• Compare Xmax vs. Energy with Monte
Carlo predictions from CORSIKA, using QGSjet and Sibyll hadronic generators.
• Measure Elongation Rate (Xmax/E)• Systematic Uncertainties• Conclusions
Pull Distribution – Data and MC
(XmaxI-XmaxII)/((XmaxI+XmaxII)/2)
Comparison of Hadronic Interaction Models
Xmax Distribution Width Predictions
Resolution After All Cuts
EnergyEnergy XXmaxmax
12% 27 gm/cm2
All-Energy Xmax Distribution
Solid Line: DataSolid Line: DataHeavy Dots: QGSJet Heavy Dots: QGSJet Light Dots: SIBYLLLight Dots: SIBYLL
Data v Proton Models Data v Iron Nuclei Models
Stereo Data:Stereo Data:~800 Events ~800 Events 11/1999 – 9/200111/1999 – 9/2001
Two-Component Mixing Model
Optimal Two-Component Fit
Xmax
# E
vent
sSolid Line: DataSolid Line: DataHeavy Dots: QGSJet Heavy Dots: QGSJet Light Dots: SIBYLLLight Dots: SIBYLL
Stereo HiRes Elongation Rate
Elongation Rate Result• HiRes Stereo:
– Range 1 x 1018 to 3 x 1019 eV– ER = 54.5 +/- 6.5 (stat) +/- 4.5 (syst)
gm/cm2 per decade energy
• HiRes Prototype/MIA: – Range 1x1017 to 1x1018 eV– ER = 93.0 +/- 8.5 (stat) +/- 10.5 (syst)
gm/cm2 per decade energy
Systematic Uncertainties:• Atmospheric attenuation:
vary atmosphere by 1• Detector trigger bias:
study acceptance with MC• Cherenkov light subtraction:
vary angular distribution by 1
• Detector pointing
Uncertainty in the Atmosphere vary by 1
Log(Energy) (eV)Log(Energy) (eV) XXmaxmax
Effect of Atmospheric Uncertainty on Elongation Rate
Effect of Detector Acceptance
Systematic Uncertainty in Xmax
• Atmospheric attenuation- 10 gm/cm2
• Cherenkov subtraction - negligible• Detector bias - 5 gm/cm2
• Pointing Direction - 15 gm/cm2
• Sum in Quadrature – 18.5 gm/cm2
Conclusions• Systematic uncertainties are significantly smaller
than the proton/Fe separation• HiRes Stereo measurement consistent with
unchanging, light composition above 1018 eV• Stereo HiRes and HiRes Prototype-MIA
measurements are consistent in overlap region• HiRes Prototype-MIA Hybrid result consistent
with changing composition (Heavy to Light) between 1017 and 1018 eV
• No significant information near GZK region yet• Come back to 29th ICRC
Determination of shower profile