stereo composition measurement with the high resolution fly’s eye

18
Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye J.N. Matthews, G. Archbold, and P. Sokolsky University of Utah For the HiRes collaboration

Upload: maina

Post on 19-Mar-2016

52 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye. J.N. Matthews, G. Archbold, and P. Sokolsky University of Utah For the HiRes collaboration. UHECR Composition Measurement. Measure depth of shower maximum (X max ) using stereo HiRes data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Stereo Composition Measurement with the

High Resolution Fly’s Eye

J.N. Matthews, G. Archbold, and P. Sokolsky

University of UtahFor the HiRes collaboration

Page 2: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

UHECR Composition Measurement• Measure depth of shower maximum (Xmax)

using stereo HiRes data.• Monte Carlo study of Xmax & E resolution• Compare Xmax vs. Energy with Monte

Carlo predictions from CORSIKA, using QGSjet and Sibyll hadronic generators.

• Measure Elongation Rate (Xmax/E)• Systematic Uncertainties• Conclusions

Page 3: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Pull Distribution – Data and MC

(XmaxI-XmaxII)/((XmaxI+XmaxII)/2)

Page 4: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Comparison of Hadronic Interaction Models

Page 5: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Xmax Distribution Width Predictions

Page 6: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Resolution After All Cuts

EnergyEnergy XXmaxmax

12% 27 gm/cm2

Page 7: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

All-Energy Xmax Distribution

Solid Line: DataSolid Line: DataHeavy Dots: QGSJet Heavy Dots: QGSJet Light Dots: SIBYLLLight Dots: SIBYLL

Data v Proton Models Data v Iron Nuclei Models

Stereo Data:Stereo Data:~800 Events ~800 Events 11/1999 – 9/200111/1999 – 9/2001

Page 8: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Two-Component Mixing Model

Page 9: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Optimal Two-Component Fit

Xmax

# E

vent

sSolid Line: DataSolid Line: DataHeavy Dots: QGSJet Heavy Dots: QGSJet Light Dots: SIBYLLLight Dots: SIBYLL

Page 10: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Stereo HiRes Elongation Rate

Page 11: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Elongation Rate Result• HiRes Stereo:

– Range 1 x 1018 to 3 x 1019 eV– ER = 54.5 +/- 6.5 (stat) +/- 4.5 (syst)

gm/cm2 per decade energy

• HiRes Prototype/MIA: – Range 1x1017 to 1x1018 eV– ER = 93.0 +/- 8.5 (stat) +/- 10.5 (syst)

gm/cm2 per decade energy

Page 12: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Systematic Uncertainties:• Atmospheric attenuation:

vary atmosphere by 1• Detector trigger bias:

study acceptance with MC• Cherenkov light subtraction:

vary angular distribution by 1

• Detector pointing

Page 13: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Uncertainty in the Atmosphere vary by 1

Log(Energy) (eV)Log(Energy) (eV) XXmaxmax

Page 14: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Effect of Atmospheric Uncertainty on Elongation Rate

Page 15: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Effect of Detector Acceptance

Page 16: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Systematic Uncertainty in Xmax

• Atmospheric attenuation- 10 gm/cm2

• Cherenkov subtraction - negligible• Detector bias - 5 gm/cm2

• Pointing Direction - 15 gm/cm2

• Sum in Quadrature – 18.5 gm/cm2

Page 17: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Conclusions• Systematic uncertainties are significantly smaller

than the proton/Fe separation• HiRes Stereo measurement consistent with

unchanging, light composition above 1018 eV• Stereo HiRes and HiRes Prototype-MIA

measurements are consistent in overlap region• HiRes Prototype-MIA Hybrid result consistent

with changing composition (Heavy to Light) between 1017 and 1018 eV

• No significant information near GZK region yet• Come back to 29th ICRC

Page 18: Stereo Composition Measurement with the High Resolution Fly’s Eye

Determination of shower profile