stepwise approach towards the swiss strategy. · „single cab“ for new vehicles 2018 smartrail...
TRANSCRIPT
Stepwise approach towards
ERTMS deployment.
The swiss strategy.
Steffen Schmidt (SBB)
CCRCC 16.11.2017
The stepwise approach to ERTMS
2004 2010 2015 2020 2025 ?
Class-B Systems
….
Network is fully interoperable.
„Single Cab“ for new vehicles.
First ETCS Level 2 lines („pure“ without signals)
Consolidation of today‘s systems
40
0k
m
ETCS OBU
2nd wave
ETCS OBU
1st wave ETCS OBU fitting3rd wave
„Single Cab“ for new vehicles
2018
SmartRail 4.0
Projects:
A game changing TMS/CCS
architecture based
also on cab signalling
Preliminary
studies
Functional
component
designs
PoCs
Cab
Signalling
Rollout
Clarification
2
2025CCS „toolbox“ is mature
and „cleaned up“.
Lifecycle is automated.
Tenders,
developements,
active support of
new product
developements
ETCS Level 1 LS or STM (packet 44)
ERTMS in 2020
3
Consolidation - Examples
DMI: bad dearness of display no safety.
And new safety requirements
multiply the cost.Systematic cryptokey
change only when
suitable online keymanagement
systems are available
TSI CCS
ERTMS-
compatible
usable
productsIncrease the
grade of LCP
automation!
Becoming mature
means especially
being automated.
Lifecycle processes (LCP)
4
5
Clarification of the future
onboard architecture (examples)
• FRMCS(Future Rail Mobile Communication System)
• TIMS, safe length and
train-end-device(Train integrity monitoring systems)
• Updateability,
maintainability,
substitutability and
exchangeability!
6
The Concept of SmartRail 4.0
A game changing TMS/CCS architecture.
Automated
Traffic Management(Schedule, Disposition, Control)
„Pure“ ERTMS-based
geometric interlocking
for cab signalling
Smart
wayside
objects
Mobile
locali-
sation
Safe
Mobileenddevices
ATO
• Highly automated (re)scheduling & control
• High integration of planning functions,
planning, disposition and control in one system
• Precise realtime control („meters and seconds“)
• Risc calculation on runtime, high „changeability“
• Safe for every operational process or asset-layout
• Interlocking and RBC in one system
• Smallest possible amount of SIL4 functions
• Fast and cheap migration in large steps
• Can control every mix of L2/HL3/L3/“L3++“
• Open modular architecture for future extensions
• Ready for larger datacenters
• Open interface
• Independent
lifecycle
• „Plug & Rail“
• Powerfull
degraded modes
• Safety for every subject
& object.
• Efficient train detection
especially for L3
• Field force management-
automation
• Higher Capacity
• Lower energy
consumption
This architecture
allows on the long run
the reduction of the
amount of trackside
assets down to 30%.
7
Thanks for your attention