stephan de roode (knmi/imau) simon axelsen (imau) pier siebesma (knmi)

14
The role of the mean relative humidity on the dynamics of shallow cumuli - LES Sensitivity experiments Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Upload: anakin

Post on 21-Mar-2016

56 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

The role of the mean relative humidity on the dynamics of shallow cumuli - LES Sensitivity experiments. Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI). Large-eddy simulation - The BOMEX shallow cumulus case. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

The role of the mean relative humidity on the dynamics of shallow cumuli - LES Sensitivity experiments

Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU)Simon Axelsen (IMAU)Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Page 2: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Large-eddy simulation -The BOMEX shallow cumulus case

BOMEX Exp 1,2,3,4

Km/s 0.008 0.008

(g/kg)m/s 0.052 0.052

w'θ'z=0

w'qt'z=0

300 305 310 3150

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

BOMEX

height [m]

virtual potential temperature θv [K]

300 305 310 3150

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

BOMEXExp 1Exp 2Exp 3Exp 4

height [m]

virtual potential temperature θv [K]

Page 3: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

LES sensitivity experiments - Set-up analogous to Derbyshire's EUROCS deep convection case

300 305 3100

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

BOMEXExp 1Exp 2Exp 3Exp 4

height [m]

potential temperature θ [K]

θv = θ+δθ( ) 1+0.61q+δq( )[ ]

4 8 12 16

BOMEXExp 1Exp 2Exp 3Exp 4

total specific humidity q [g/kg]

θ [K]

q [g/kg]

BOMEX

Exp 1 0.04 -0.2

Exp 2 0.07 -0.4

Exp 3 -0.07 0.4

Exp 4 -0.13 0.7

Page 4: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Results for cloud core : mass fluxAll averages taken over the 3rd hour

0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.0250

500

1000

1500BOMEX[m/s]Exp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

core mass-flux [m/s]

height above cloud base [m]

Page 5: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Results for cloud core : vertical velocity and core fraction

0 1 2 3 4 5 60

500

1000

1500

BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

core vertical velocity [m/s]

height above cloud base [m]

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04core fraction

Page 6: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Mixed parcel diagram -Buoyancy reversal

χ = menvmcld+menv

Page 7: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Buoyancy reversal - Dependency on mean vertical gradients

Γθ =∂θ∂z , Γq =∂q

∂z0.0

1.0

Page 8: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

and fractional entrainment rate.Diagnosis from LES results.

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.0040

200

400

600

800

1000BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

fractional entrainment rate ε [m -1 ]

hεight abovε lou basε [m]

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

200

400

600

800

1000

BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

*

hεight abovε lou basε [m]

Page 9: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Kain & Fritsch parameterization- Assume flat PDF for

ε = ε0 *2 (Bretherton et al. 2004)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.40

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004BomexExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

fractional entrainment rate

ε [m-1]

iagnosε from LES

ritial mixing fration sθuarε *

2

orε sampling

Page 10: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Bowen ratio, convective velocity scale w* and mass-flux

w'θ'0x 1000 [Km/s]

w'q'v0

x 10-5 [m/s]

BOMEX 8.0 5.2

Exp 1 9.9 4.2

Exp 2 13.6 2.1

Exp 3 6.1 6.2

Exp 4 4.2 7.3

-0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.020

500

1000

1500

2000

BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

w'θv' [mK/s]

hεight [m]

Page 11: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Bowen ratio, convective velocity scale w* and mass-flux

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.040

500

1000

1500

BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

cloud core fraction

height above cloud base [m]

0 2 4 6cloud core vertical velocity [m/s]

0 0.01 0.02 0.03cloud core mass flux [m/s]

Page 12: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Conclusions

• Set I - Change relative humidity, but keep mean buoyance the sameCloud fraction changes =>Mass flux changes

• Set II - Change Bowen ratio, but keep surface buoyancy flux the sameCloud fraction changes =>Mass flux changes (also at cloud base)

Page 13: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

Results for cloud core : fractional entrainment and detrainment

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.0040

200

400

600

800

1000BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

fractional entrainment rate ε [m -1 ]

hεight abovε lou basε [m]

0 0.005 0.01 0.015fractional detrainment rate [m -1 ]

Page 14: Stephan de Roode (KNMI/IMAU) Simon Axelsen (IMAU) Pier Siebesma (KNMI)

* from LES

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.60

200

400

600

800

1000

BOMEXExp1Exp2Exp3Exp4

*

hεight abovε lou basε [m]