statutory construction part4
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
1/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
2/66
- A statute must be capable of construction orinterpretation. Otherwise, said statute is
inoperative.
- The court must use every authorized means toascertain the intent of the statute and give itan intelligible meaning.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
3/66
Where there is no ambiguity in the words ofthe statute, there is no room for
construction.
Where the law is clear and unambiguous, itmust be taken to mean exactly what is saysand the court has no choice but to see to itthat its mandate be obeyed.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
4/66
- A condition sine qua non, before the courtmay construe or interpret a statute, is that
there be doubt or ambiguity in its language.
- The court may not construe or interpret astatute that is clear and free from doubt.
- A statute that is clear and unambiguous is notsusceptible of interpretation or construction.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
5/66
- Where the law speaks in clear and categoricallanguage, there is no room for interpretation.
There is only room for application.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
6/66
- A condition of admitting two or moremeanings, of being understood in more than
one way, or referring to two or more things atthe same time.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
7/66
- A statute is ambiguous if it is susceptible ofmore than one interpretation.
- As a result of such ambiguity, doubt is createdas to what the statute means or as towhether it applies to a given situation.
- Construction is the means by which the courtclarifies the doubt to arrive at the true intentof the law.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
8/66
- Where the meaning of a statute is ambiguous,the court is warranted in availing itself of all
legitimate aids to construction in order that itcan ascertain the true intent of the statute.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
9/66
1.) Intrinsic Aids those which are found in theprinted pages of the statute itself.
2.) Extrinsic Aids - Those extraneous facts andcircumstances outside the printed page ofthe statute itself.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
10/66
- Those which may be found in the printed pageof the statute itself.
- Refers to the basic parts of the statutes whichserves as basic guide and aids the court inorder to arrive at the true meaning of thestatute by determining legislative intent.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
11/66
- Are those extraneous facts and circumstancesfound outside the printed page of the statute.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
12/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
13/66
- Whether to adhere to the language of thestatute or to depart from the same.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
14/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
15/66
- Enunciates the adherence to the language ofthe statute itself.
- Otherwise known as the PlainMeaning Rule
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
16/66
- As a general rule, the intent of the legislatureto be ascertained and thereafter given effect
is the intent expressed in the language of thestatute.
- If a statute is clear, plain and free fromambiguity, it must be given its literal meaningand applied without attemptedinterpretation.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
17/66
- When the words and phrases of a statute areclear and unequivocal, their meaning must be
determined from the language employed andthe statute must be taken to mean exactlywhat it says.
- Absoluta sententia expositore non indiget orwhen the language of the law is clear, noexplanation of it is required.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
18/66
- The fundamental rule is that legislative intentmust be determined from the language of the
statute itself and must be adhered to eventhough the court is convinced by extraneouscircumstances that the legislature intendedto enact something very different from whatthat which it did enact.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
19/66
- To depart from the meaning expressed by thewords of the statute is to alter the same, to
legislate and not to interpret.
- Maledicta est expositio quae corrumpittextum or it is dangerous construction whichis against the text.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
20/66
- Such adherence to the language of theStatute is in keeping with the principle of dura
lex sed lex or the law may be harsh but it isstill the law and the principle of hoc quidemperquam durum est, sed ita lex scripta estor itis exceedingly hard but so the law is written.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
21/66
- Language is rarely so free from ambiguity asto be incapable of being used in more than
one sense.
- What the legislature had actually in mind isnot sometimes accurately reflected in thelanguage of a statute and its literalinterpretation may render it meaningless,lead to absurdity, injustice or contradiction.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
22/66
- Thus, when this happens resort is had to theprinciple that the spirit of the law controls its
letter.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
23/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
24/66
- Interpretation according to the intent or spiritof the law
- Enunciates a departure from the language ofthe statute.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
25/66
- The spirit or intention of a statute prevails overthe letter thereof. A thing which is within theintention of the statute is as much within the
statute as if it were within the letter, and a thingwhich is within the letter of the statute is notwithin the statute unless it be within theintention of the lawmaker, and the statute
should be so construed to effectuate its intent orpurpose, advance the remedy and suppress themischief contemplated by the framers.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
26/66
- The literal import or meaning of a statutemust yield to its apparent intent, purpose or
spirit.
- Verba intentioni, non e contra debent inservireor words ought to be more subservient to theintent and not the intent to the words.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
27/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
28/66
- The key to open the door to what thelegislature intended which is vaguely
expressed in the language of a statute is itspurpose or the reason which induced it toenact the statute.
- If the statue needs construction, the mostdominant in that process is the purpose ofthe act.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
29/66
- Statutes should be construed in the light ofthe object to be achieved and the evil or
mischief to be suppressed and they should begiven construction as will advance the object,suppress the mischief and secure the benefitsintended.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
30/66
- Where a provision or section of a statute admitsof more than one construction, that constructionwhich gives effect to the evident purpose sought
to be attained by the enactment of the statutemust be followed.
- Courts therefore should not follow the letter of astatute when to do so would depart from thetrue intent of the legislature or would otherwiseyield conclusions inconsistent with the purposeof the act.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
31/66
When the reason of the law ceases, the lawitself ceases
- The reason which induced the legislature toenact a law is the heart of the law. As aconsequence, the cessation of the law or itsnullification renders it inoperative.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
32/66
- When the reason of the law ceases, the lawitself ceases.
Cessante ratione legis, cessat et ipsa lex
ratio legis est animaor the reason of the lawis its soul. Thus, a lifeless law is a dead law.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
33/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
34/66
- Courts are not to give a statute meaning thatwould lead to absurdities.
- Consideration: Congress could not haveintended absurd interpretation of the law.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
35/66
- If the words of a statute are susceptible of morethan one meaning, the absurdity of the result ofone construction is a strong argument against
the adoption and in favor of such sensibleconstruction as will avoid such result.
Interpretatio talis in ambiguis semper fienda estut evitetur inconveniens et absurdumor wherethere is ambiguity, such interpretation as willavoid inconvenience and absurdity is to beadopted.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
36/66
- Statutes must be construed in such a way asto give effect to the intention of the
legislature, and so as to give a sensiblemeaning to the language of the statute andthus avoid nonsensical or absurd results,departing to the extent unavoidable from the
literal language of the statute.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
37/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
38/66
Presumption: The legislature, in enacting alaw, did not intend to work a hardship or anoppressive result, a possible abuse of
authority or act of oppression, arming oneperson with a weapon to impose hardship onanother.
Eaest accipienda interpretaio quae vitio caretor that interpretation is to be adopted whichis free from evil or injustice.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
39/66
- There is a valid presumption that undesirableconsequences were never intended by a
legislative measure, and that a constructionof which a statute is fairly susceptible isfavored, which will avoid all objectionable,mischievous, indefensible, wrongful, evil and
injurious consequences.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
40/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
41/66
- It is a well-established rule of statutoryconstruction that where great inconvenience
will result, or great public interest will beendangered or sacrificed, or great mischiefdone, from a particular construction of astatute, such construction is to be avoided.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
42/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
43/66
- In case of doubt in the interpretation orapplication of a law, it is presumed that the
lawmaking body intended and justice toprevail.
- In balancing conflicting solutions, that one is
perceived to tip the scales which the courtbelieves will best promote the public welfarein its probable operation shall be favored.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
44/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
45/66
- Where the literal import of the language ofthe statute shows that words have been
omitted that should have been in the statutein order to carry out its intent and spirit,clearly ascertainable from the context, thecourt may supply the omission to make the
statute conform to the obvious intent of thelegislature or to prevent the act from beingabsurd.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
46/66
- The said rule is in keeping with the principlethat what is within the spirit of law is as much
a part of it as what is written pursuant towhich an apparent omission in aninterpretation purely literal of the languageused may be remedied by adhering to its
avowed objective and intent.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
47/66
- The court, in order to carry out the obviousintent of the legislature, may correct clerical
errors, mistakes or misprints which, ifuncorrected, would render the statutemeaningless, empty or nonsensical or woulddefeat or impair its intended operation, so
long as the meaning intended is apparent onthe face of the whole enactment and nospecific provision is abrogated.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
48/66
- To correct the error or mistake is to preventthe nullification of the statute and give it a
meaning and purpose.
- It is the duty of the court to give a statute asensible construction, one that will effectuate
legislative intent and avoid injustice orabsurdity. It is therefore the courtsduty to
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
49/66
arrive at the legislative intent and in doing so, itshould not adopt an arbitrary rule under
which it must be held without variance orshadow of turning that the legislatureintended to make a typographical error, theresult of which be to make nonsense of the
act, and not to carry out the legislativescheme but to destroy it.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
50/66
Qualification: What the courts may correct toreflect the real and apparent intention of thelegislature are only those which are clearly
clerical errors or obvious mistakes, omissionsand misprints. Courts may not, in the guise ofconstruction, correct what they think is due tooversight as shown by an examination ofextraneous circumstances, where the statute is
clear and to correct it would be to change themeaning of the law, or specific provision will beabrogated.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
51/66
Rule: Where a word, phrase or clause in astatute is devoid of meaning in relation to the
context or intent of the statute, or where itsuggests a meaning that nullifies the statuteor renders it without sense, the word, phraseor clause may be rejected as a surplusage and
entirely ignored.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
52/66
- Surplusage does not vitiate a statute.
Surplusagium non noceat
utileper inutile non viaturor the useful is notvitiated by the non-useful
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
53/66
- While the general rule is that every effortshould be made to give some meaning to
every part of the statute, this rule does notimpose upon the courts an imperativeobligation to give every redundant word orphrase a special significance.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
54/66
- A possible interpretation of a word or phrasewhich tends to defeat the whole purpose of
the law is to be rejected, when the use ofsuch word or phrase may fairly and properlybe treated as a mere reiteration or repetitionof other language in the statute.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
55/66
Rule: Court should not and cannot always bebound by the phraseology or literal meaning of astatute. They may at times disregard loose or
obscure words in order to arrive at the realmeaning and spirit of the statute.
- Neither does false description precludeconstruction nor vitiate the meaning of the
statute which is otherwise clear. (Falsademonstratio non nocet, cum de corporeconstat)
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
56/66
Rule: Every rule is not without an exception
Ibi quid generaliter conceditur; inest haecexceptio, si non aliquid sit contras jus basque where anything is granted generally, thisexception is implied.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
57/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
58/66
Rule: When the context of a statute so indicate,words in plural include the singular and viceversa.
- A plural word in statute may thus apply to asingular person or thing, just as a singular
word may embrace two or more persons.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
59/66
Rule: In construing a statute, the masculine,but not the feminine includes all genders,unless the context in which the word is usedin the statute indicates otherwise.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
60/66
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
61/66
- No statute can be enacted that can provide allthe details involved in the application. Thereis always an omission that may not meet aparticular situation. What is thought, at thetime of enactment, to be an all-embracinglegislation may be inadequate to proved for
the unfolding events of the future. These so-called gaps in the law develop as the law isenforced.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
62/66
- One of the rules of statutory constructionused to fill in the gap is the doctrine ofnecessary implication.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
63/66
What is implied in a statute is as much a partthereof as that which is expressed.
- Every statue is understood, by implication, tocontain all such provisions as may be necessaryto effectuate its object and purpose, or to makeeffective rights, powers, privileges or jurisdiction
which it grants, including all such collateral andsubsidiary consequences as may be fairly andlogically inferred from its terms.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
64/66
In eo quod plus sit, semper inest et minusthe greater includes the lesser.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
65/66
Rule: Where there is a right, there is a remedyfor violation thereof. (ubi jus, ibi remedium)
- The fact that the statute is silent as to theremedy is implied from such right.
-
8/12/2019 Statutory Construction Part4
66/66
Jurisdiction to hear and decide cases isconferred by law.
- The grant of jurisdiction to try action carrieswith it all necessary and incidental powers toemploy all writs, processes and other means
to make the courtsjurisdiction effective.