statistical abstract fiscal year 2015 - tn.gov · statistical abstract fiscal year 2015 prepared:...

F2015

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT

FISCAL YEAR 2015

Prepared: October 2015

By

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION

Decision Support: Research and Planning Division

2015

Statistical Abstract

FY 2015


FY 2015



Decision Sport

The Tennessee Department of Correction Fiscal Year 2014 – 2015 Statistical Abstract

Coordinated and Published by

Decision Support: Research & Planning Division

Tanya Washington, Director Tim Oliver, Administrative Services Assistant

To request a copy of this report, or other research information, contact us at

Telephone: 615-253-8187 Email: [email protected]

Visit the TDOC website: www.tn.gov/correction

Pursuant to the State of Tennessee’s policy on nondiscrimination, the Department of Correction does not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, religion, color, national or ethnic origin, age, pregnancy, creed, disability, or veteran’s status in its policies, or in the admission of or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs, services, or activities. Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, EEO/AA Coordinator, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423. ADA inquiries or complaints should be directed to the Department of Correction, Human Resources Office, 3rd Floor Rachel Jackson Building, 320 Sixth Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37243-0465, Telephone 615-253-8026 or TDD (for persons with hearing impairments), 615-532-4423.

BUDGET & STAFFINGPersonnel by Race and Sex 9Personnel by Class 9Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates 10Correctional Officer Series 11Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 11Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population 12Salary Comparisons 13Correctional Officer Turnover Rate 14Probation/Parole Officer Series Vacancy Rates 15Probation/Parole Officer Series 15Authorized Full Time Equivalents (FTE'S) 16Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate 16Budget Recommendations by Function of Government 17POPULATION, CAPACITY & TRENDSInstitutional Capacity & Population Distribution 21Operating Capacity v. Inmate Population Projections 22Total Incarcerated Felon Population (Historical and Projected) 22Total Incarcerated Felon Population 23Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Inmate Population Trends 23Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population by Sex 24Felony Inmate Population by Age 25Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race 26Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location 26Local Jail Census 27Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (In-house Population Detail) 28Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense (Admissions) 29Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Location) 30Average Time Served by Primary Offense (Releases by Type) 31Yearly Inmate Admissions and Releases 32Felony Inmate Admissions by Type 32Felony Inmate Releases by Type 32Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 33Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 33Inmate Admissions by Geographical Region 34Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction 35Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction 36Total Community Supervision Felon Population 37Community Supervision Population by Age 38Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type 39Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex 40Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex 40Community Supervision Admissions and Releases 41Community Supervision Releases by Type 41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

OFFENDER ACCOUNTABILITY, PROGRAMS & SERVIVCESTotal Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service Work 45Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by Community Supervision 45Inmate Program Assignments 46Inmate Drug Screens 47Inmate Educational Enrollment 48Inmate Education Test Results 48GED & Vocational Certificates 48Chronic Disease Clinic Caseload 495-Year Analysis of Hospital Admissions 50Behavioral Health Services 50Mental Health Level of Care II 51Quality Assurance 52Offender Development and Rehabilitation 52INSTITUTIONS (DEMOGRAPHICS)Facility and Probation/Parole Office Locations 55Prison Security Designations 56Inmate Population Custody Levels 56Average Daily Population 56Demographics by Facility 57Facility Populations by Primary Offense 58Incidents: FY 2014 - 2015 58Incident Summary 59Demographics of Parolees 62Demographics of Probationers 63Community Supervision Offenders Levels of Supervision 64Statistical Abstract User's Guide 67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Budget and Staffing

Budget & Staffing 9

Personnel Type FY 14-15 FY 13-14 FY12-13 FY11-12 FY10-11 FY09-10 FY08-09 FY07-08 FY06-07 FY05-06

Officials/ Administrators

2.5% 2.3% 2.2% 2.2% 2.2% 2.1% 2.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.0%

Security 54.1% 56.5% 54.8% 65.3% 65.4% 64.7% 65.3% 64.0% 64.3% 64.4%

Maintenance 3.3% 3.4% 3.3% 4.0% 4.1% 4.4% 4.4% 4.3% 4.3% 4.4%

Professional 29.5% 27.5% 28.5% 16.6% 16.5% 16.9% 16.1% 16.5% 16.3% 16.1%

Skilled 1.9% 1.8% 1.7% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 2.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1%

Clerical 6.9% 6.6% 6.7% 6.2% 6.2% 6.5% 6.8% 7.4% 7.4% 7.5%

Technical 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 3.7% 3.7% 3.6% 3.4% 3.4% 3.4% 3.5%

The Central Office Human Resources section provides technical assistance and advice and ensures compliance with Civil Service Rules, EEOC/Affirmative Action, state law, and policies. This section also implements and monitors personnel-related programs such as employee relations, recruitment and retention, training, performance evaluations, employee transactions, and employee benefits, including accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Personnel by Race and Sex: June 30, 2015

Male Female Total White 2,813 1,523 4,336 Black 598 861 1,459

American Indian 12 6 18 Asian 12 10 22

Hispanic 43 25 68 Other 14 15 29

Total 3,492 2,440 5,932

Personnel by Class: June 30, 2015

10 2015 Statistical Abstract

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

16.0%

18.0%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Ra

te

Fiscal Year

Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates on July 1, 2015

VACANCIES IN SECURITY STAFF

Correctional Officer Series Vacancy Rates from 2015

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate

7/1/2015 335 3,479 9.6%

7/1/2014 266 3,712 7.2%7/1/2013 308 3,705 8.3%7/1/2012 135 3,408 4.0%7/1/2011 125 3,389 3.7%7/1/2010 112 3,360 3.3%

7/1/2009 143 3,360 4.3%7/1/2008 173 3,491 5.0%7/1/2007 94 3,356 2.8%7/1/2006 73 3,340 2.2%7/1/2005 55 3,335 1.6%

Budget & Staffing 11

Facility Security Non-Security Total

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex 503 217 720DeBerry Special Needs Facility 275 237 512Mark Luttrell Correctional Complex 116 62 178Morgan County Correctional Complex 471 218 689Northeast Correctional Complex 345 158 503Northwest Correctional Complex 441 206 647Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 284 66 350Tennessee Correction Academy 1 91 92Tennessee Prison for Women 172 72 244Turney Center Industrial Complex 304 131 435West Tennessee State Penitentiary 506 201 707

Facility Subtotal 3418 1659 5077

Central Office 2 264 266

Total 3420 1923 5343

% of Total 64% 36% 100%

AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) in FY 2014 - 2015

Correctional Officer Series

June 30, 2015

PositionsCorrectional

Officer

Correctional Clerical Officer Corporal Sergeant Lieutenant Captain TOTAL

Total 2,573 131 459 181 77 58 3,479

Filled 2,284 127 416 181 78 58 3,144


0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

20,000

24,000

Av

erag

e D

aily

Po

pu

lati

on

Fiscal Year

Facility Staffing vs. Inmate Average Daily Population FY 2005 – 2015

ADP

Facility FTE

Uniformed FTE

STAFFING TRENDS

Correctional facility staffing trends are presented in the graph above. They include data on total facility staffing (expressed in FTEs or full time equivalents) and uniformed security staffing levels as compared to the average daily inmate population. Between FY 2005 and FY 2015: Inmate average daily population increased by 7.6% Total facility staffing decreased by 4.9% Total uniformed security staffing decreased by 15.8%.


SALARY COMPARISONS The ability to recruit and retain qualified staff continues to be a concern for the Department. Because salary levels are critical in recruitment and retention of staff, the Department closely monitors other correctional and law enforcement agencies to compare its salaries with those offered by agencies performing similar functions.

When compared to neighboring state correctional departments, TDOC ranks 6th in the average starting salary for correctional officers. Of the 15 states participating in the Southern Legislative Conference, Tennessee places 9th – with an average starting salary below the SLC average of $26,839. Source: Southern Legislative Conference – July 2014

TDOC also ranks low when compared to other correctional and law enforcement agencies located near some of our facilities. These are some of the agencies with whom we compete directly in the recruitment and retention of uniformed staff.

State DOC Average Starting Salary

Arkansas $30,135

Missouri $29,500

North Carolina $28,826

Alabama $28,516

Virginia $28,035

Tennessee

$27,060 (July 1, 2015)

Georgia $24,322

Kentucky Mississippi

$23,346

$22,006

Federal Bureau of Prisons $39,400

Shelby County Sheriff’s Office

$35,531

Davidson County Sheriff’s Office $33,166

Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office Knox County Sheriff’s Office

$32,090 $30,507


Correctional Officer Series Turnover Rate

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex BCCX 55.2%

Charles Bass Correctional Complex CBCX 35.0%

DeBerry Special Needs Facility DSNF 40.2%

Mark Luttrell Correctional Facility MLCC 25.9%

Morgan County Correctional Complex MCCX 29.6%

Northeast Correctional Complex NECX 19.7%

Northwest Correctional Complex NWCX 49.2%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution RMSI 48.8%

Tennessee Prison for Women TPFW 55.8%

Turney Center Industrial Complex TCIX 30.6%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary WTSP 43.8%

System-wide 40.3%

Institution

TURNOVER RATES FY 2014 - 2015

In FY 2015, the correctional officer turnover rate was 40.3% systemwide. The turnover rate includes all officers leaving positions, but excludes those occurring when an employee is transferred or promoted within the TDOC system in the correctional or probation/parole officer series.


Security Non-Security Total

District 10 56 17 73District 20 61 14 75District 21 35 10 45District 30 81 23 104District 31 28 6 34District 40 42 12 54District 41 44 12 56District 42 38 11 49District 50 49 14 63District 51 37 12 49District 60 33 11 44District 61 40 13 53District 70 29 14 43District 71 26 9 35District 72 51 12 63District 80 35 11 46District 81 32 6 38

Total Districts 717 207 924

Central Office 2 10 12

Total Community Supervision

719 217 936

% of Total 77% 23% 100%

AUTHORIZED FULLTIME EQUIVALENTS (FTE'S) in FY 2014 - 2015

Positions PPO2 PPO3 TOTALVacancy

Rate

Total 632 122 754Filled 598 120 718

4.8%

As of: Vacant Positions Total Positions Vacancy Rate

7/1/2015 36 754 4.8%7/1/2014 41 790 5.2%7/1/2013 34 793 4.3%

Probation/Parole Officer Series

2015 Vacancy Rate

Probation/Parole Officer Series June 30, 2015


DivisionNumber of

FTE's % of Total

Facilities 5077 81%Community Supervision 936 15%Central Office 278 4%Total 6291 100%

Total FTE's

Community Supervision District

Probation/Parole Officer Turnover Rate

District 10 18.1%District 20 17.9%District 21 14.7%District 30 13.8%District 31 18.5%District 40 15.0%District 41 7.3%District 42 30.6%District 50 13.0%District 51 25.8%District 60 25.0%District 61 5.4%District 70 6.9%District 71 23.1%District 72 5.9%District 80 11.4%District 81 46.2%

Systemwide 16.4%

81% of the total authorized positions for TDOC are in correctional facilities. 15% of the total systemwide FTE’s are in Community Supervision 66% of the total systemwide FTE’s are in uniformed security

Community Supervision Turnover


TDOC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STATE BUDGET

FY 2014 - 2015 Total Budget Recommendations By Function of Government

The State of Tennessee's Budget included $31.3 billion in recommended funding allocated by "functional area." Total funding budgeted for the Department of Correction in FY 2015 was $933,036,300.

Population, Capacity, and Trends

Population, Capacity, & Trends 21

.

GENERAL PURPOSE FACILITIESBledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Female 300 294 277 92.3% 94.2%

Hardeman County Correctional Center (HCCF) 2,100 1,976 2,000 95.2% 101.2%

Mark Luttrell Correctional Center (MLCC) 454 445 435 95.8% 97.8%

Northeast Correctional Complex (NECX) 1,880 1,842 1,801 95.8% 97.8%

Northwest Correctional Complex (NWCX) 2,438 2,389 2,404 98.6% 100.6%

South Central Correctional Facility (SCCF) 1,700 1,642 1,677 98.6% 102.1%

Turney Center Industrial Complex (TCIX) 1,684 1,650 1,571 93.3% 95.2%

Whiteville Correctional Facility (WCFA) 1,619 1,505 1,534 94.7% 101.9%

SUB-TOTAL 12,175 11,743 11,699 96.1% 99.6%

CLASSIFICATION FACILITIES

Bledsoe County Correctional Complex (BCCX) - Male 2,239 2,194 2,138 95.5% 97.4%

Tennessee Prison for Women (TPFW) 817 801 752 92.0% 93.9%

SUB-TOTAL 3,056 2,995 2,890 94.6% 96.5%

SPECIAL PURPOSE FACILITIES

DeBerry Special Needs Facility (DSNF) 854 786 658 77.0% 83.7%

SUB-TOTAL 854 786 658 77.0% 83.7%

HIGH SECURITY FACILITIES

Morgan County Correctional Complex (MCCX) 2,166 2,101 2,087 96.4% 99.3%

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution (RMSI) 819 794 772 94.3% 97.2%

West Tennessee State Penitentiary (WTSP) 2,318 2,248 2,243 96.8% 99.8%

SUB-TOTAL 5,303 5,143 5,102 96.2% 99.2%

TOTALS 21,388 20,667 20,349 95.1% 98.5%Source: TDOC Population Overview Report.

INSTITUTIONTotal Beds Available

TDOC Operating Capacity

Assigned Count as of 6/30/2015

Population as a Percent of

Available Beds

Operating Capacity

TDOC INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY & POPULATION DISTRIBUTION


26,998

27,325

27,164

28,473

29,869

29,755

29,885

29,263

29,222

29,514

29,72030,537 31,002

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

Po

pu

lati

on

Fiscal Year

Total Felon Inmate Population (Historical and Projected), 2008 - 2020

TDOC OPERATING CAPACITY COMPARED TO INMATE POPULATION PROJECTIONS

Fiscal Year End June 30th

Operating Capacity

Projected Population

Unmet Bed Demand

2016 23,634 29,222 5,5882017 23,634 29,514 5,8802018 23,634 29,720 6,0862019 23,634 30,537 6,9032020 23,634 31,002 7,368


.

FELON POPULATION TRENDS

The felon population data included in this Statistical Abstract is from the Tennessee Offender Management Information System (TOMIS) unless otherwise stated. Data from other sources may vary from TOMIS due to the time delay in the TOMIS data entry process. The data on this page and page 24 are from TDOC monthly population reports.

Total Incarcerated Felon Population: June 30, 2015

County/Local Jails Locally Sentenced 5,007 TDOC Backup 3,907 TDOC Prisons 20,349

TOTAL 29,263 Source: Tennessee Felon Population Update

Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population Trends


Over the past 14 fiscal years (2002 - 2015), the incarcerated felon population (including TDOC backup and locally sentenced felons) has increased 20.7% (from 24,235 to 29,263). The male and female felon population increased 17.3% (from 22,637 to 26,555) and 69.5% (from 1,598 to 2,708) respectively during this same period. During the past fiscal year, the total incarcerated felon population decreased from 29,885 in June 2014 to 29,263 in June 2015, a decrease of 2.1%. The male felon population decreased 2.0% and the female felon population decreased 3.2% during FY 2015.

Fiscal Year-End Incarcerated Felon Population: FY 2002 - 2015


.

65+ 489 2.4% 29 0.5% 19 0.6% 537 1.8%60-64 576 2.8% 61 1.0% 40 1.3% 677 2.3%55-59 1,060 5.2% 191 3.0% 109 3.5% 1,360 4.6%50-54 1,685 8.2% 320 5.0% 184 5.9% 2,189 7.3%45-49 2,010 9.8% 487 7.7% 206 6.6% 2,703 9.0%40-44 2,580 12.6% 742 11.7% 303 9.8% 3,625 12.1%35-39 3,184 15.6% 1044 16.5% 393 12.7% 4,621 15.5%30-34 3,409 16.7% 1331 21.0% 487 15.7% 5,227 17.5%25-29 3,347 16.4% 1271 20.0% 614 19.8% 5,232 17.5%20-24 1,992 9.8% 833 13.1% 692 22.3% 3,517 11.8%18-19 83 0.4% 35 0.6% 45 1.5% 163 0.5%<18 12 0.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 13 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 5 0.2% 6 0.0%

TOTAL 20,427 100% 6,345 100% 3,098 100% 29,870 100%Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

TDOC INHOUSE

%TDOC

BACKUP%

LOCAL FELON

% SYSTEMWIDE %

FELONY INMATE DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE

Felony Inmate Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2015

Felony Inmate Population by Age: June 30, 2015


Black43%

White55%

Other2%

Felony Inmate Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide) June 30, 2015

Female10%

Male90%

Felony Inmate Population by Sex, Race, and Location June 30, 2015

Male

Black 8,899 47.0% 1,470 27.6% 1,810 66.2% 12,179

White 9,542 50.4% 3,781 70.9% 852 31.1% 14,175

Asian 44 0.2% 8 0.2% 8 0.3% 60

Hispanic 430 2.3% 73 1.4% 62 2.3% 565

Native American 25 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 27

Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 2 0.1% 3

Total Male 18,940 100.0% 5,333 100.0% 2,736 100.0% 27,009

Female

Black 376 25.3% 118 11.7% 117 32.3% 611

White 1076 72.4% 887 87.6% 243 67.1% 2206

Asian 5 0.3% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5Hispanic 23 1.5% 6 0.6% 1 0.3% 30

Native American 7 0.5% 1 0.1% 1 0.3% 9

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

Total Female 1,487 100.0% 1,012 100.0% 362 100.0% 2,861

TOTAL 20,427 68.4% 6,345 21.2% 3,098 10.4% 29,870

% Local % SystemwideTDOC % Backup


.

LOCAL JAIL CENSUS

JULY

AUG

SE

PT

OC

TN

OV

DE

CJA

NFE

BM

ARAP

RM

AYJU

NE

27,7

8228

,070

27,9

4227

,525

26,6

6125

,095

26,7

0626

,322

26,4

0427

,172

27,8

0827

,723

TD

OC

Bac

kup

4,46

54,

535

4,65

64,

570

4,70

64,

619

4,59

14,

599

4,67

04,

879

4,92

05,

007

Loca

l Fel

ons

4,09

44,

139

4,19

74,

163

4,05

23,

898

3,98

44,

037

3,90

63,

895

3,92

63,

907

Oth

er C

onvi

cted

Fel

ons

512

520

571

673

549

525

587

577

536

609

677

670

Con

vict

ed M

isde

mea

nant

s4,

944

4,98

74,

761

4,87

34,

378

3,84

14,

630

4,45

14,

134

4,38

94,

456

4,47

5

Oth

ers

816

782

844

801

739

712

796

786

899

9

50

890

909

Pre

-tri

al D

etai

nees

Felo

ny8,

853

8,91

98,

840

8,84

28,

533

8,25

28,

504

8,30

98,

630

8,71

88,

982

8,96

5

Mis

dem

eana

nt4,

098

4,18

84,

073

3,60

33,

704

3,24

83,

614

3,56

33,

629

3,73

23,

957

3,79

0

JULY

AUG

SE

PT

OC

TN

OV

DE

CJA

NFE

BM

ARAP

RM

AYJU

NE

TD

OC

Bac

kup

16.1

%16

.2%

16.7

%16

.6%

17.7

%18

.4%

17.2

%17

.5%

17.7

%18

.0%

17.7

%18

.1%

Loca

l Fel

ons

14.7

%14

.7%

15.0

%15

.1%

15.2

%15

.5%

14.9

%15

.3%

14.8

%14

.3%

14.1

%14

.1%

Oth

er C

onvi

cted

Fel

ons

1.8%

1.9%

2.0%

2.4%

2.1%

2.1%

2.2%

2.2%

2.0%

2.2%

2.4%

2.4%

Con

vict

ed M

isde

mea

nant

s17

.8%

17.8

%17

.0%

17.7

%16

.4%

15.3

%17

.3%

16.9

%15

.7%

16.2

%16

.0%

16.1

%

Oth

ers

2.9%

2.8%

3.0%

2.9%

2.8%

2.8%

3.0%

3.0%

3.4%

3.5%

3.2%

3.3%

Pre

-tri

al D

etai

nees

Felo

ny31

.9%

31.8

%31

.6%

32.1

%32

.0%

32.9

%31

.8%

31.6

%32

.7%

32.1

%32

.3%

32.3

%

Mis

dem

eana

nt14

.8%

14.9

%14

.6%

13.1

%13

.9%

12.9

%13

.5%

13.5

%13

.7%

13.7

%14

.2%

13.7

%

Loca

l Jai

l Cen

sus:

FY

201

4 - 2

0145

Tot

al J

ail P

opul

atio

n

Per

cent

age

of J

ail

Pop

ulat

ion

Sou

rce:

TD

OC

Jai

l Sum

mar

y R

epor

t as

of J

une

30, 2

015


NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

NU

MB

ER

% O

FA

VE

RA

GE

OF

TD

OC

SE

NT

EN

CE

OF

TD

OC

SE

NT

EN

CE

OF

LO

CA

LL

YS

EN

TE

NC

EO

FS

YS

TE

M -

SE

NT

EN

CE

PR

IMA

RY

OF

FE

NS

E G

RO

UP

OF

FE

ND

ER

SIN

HO

US

E(Y

EA

RS

)O

FF

EN

DE

RS

BA

CK

UP

(YE

AR

S)

OF

FE

ND

ER

SS

EN

TE

NC

ED

(YE

AR

S)

OF

FE

ND

ER

SW

IDE

(YE

AR

S)

H

omic

ide

M

urd

er

3,95

119

.34%

28.3

232

0.50

%21

.41

170.

55%

5.82

4,00

013

.39%

28.0

2

N

eglig

ent M

ansl

aug

hte

r18

0.09

%6.

672

0.03

%2.

004

0.13

%3.

5024

0.08

%5.

75

K

idn

app

ing

273

1.34

%19

.28

300.

47%

9.30

70.

23%

6.29

310

1.04

%17

.95

S

ex O

ffen

ses

F

orci

ble

2,70

513

.24%

25.6

410

21.

61%

9.63

351.

13%

5.62

2,84

29.

51%

24.7

9

N

on-F

orci

ble

109

0.53

%9.

8360

0.95

%3.

3017

0.55

%4.

1818

60.

62%

7.21

A

ssau

lt

Ag

gra

vate

d A

ssau

lt2,

547

12.4

7%16

.13

594

9.36

%6.

5842

513

.72%

4.72

3,56

611

.94%

13.1

7

Oth

er A

ssau

lt22

0.11

%6.

0556

0.88

%2.

9126

0.84

%2.

6310

40.

35%

3.50

A

rson

870.

43%

15.8

328

0.44

%6.

912

0.06

%4.

0011

70.

39%

13.4

9

B

urg

lary

1,69

38.

29%

10.3

41,

014

15.9

8%5.

8957

818

.66%

3.50

3,28

511

.00%

7.92

F

org

ery/

Fra

ud

275

1.35

%7.

6730

04.

73%

3.69

782.

52%

3.50

653

2.19

%5.

34

L

arce

ny/

Th

eft

794

3.89

%8.

9683

413

.14%

4.60

342

11.0

4%3.

821,

970

6.60

%6.

21

R

obb

ery

Ag

gra

vate

d R

obb

ery

2,41

811

.84%

18.1

525

84.

07%

10.4

974

2.39

%7.

372,

750

9.21

%17

.13

All

Oth

er R

obb

ery

561

2.75

%9.

8516

92.

66%

6.17

146

4.71

%5.

2587

62.

93%

8.37

D

rug

Off

ense

s

Coc

ain

e 1,

696

8.30

%14

.17

537

8.46

%9.

6121

06.

78%

6.71

2,44

38.

18%

12.5

3

Oth

er D

rug

Off

ense

s1,

845

9.03

%10

.92

1,41

422

.29%

5.74

357

11.5

2%4.

943,

616

12.1

1%8.

30

V

ehic

ula

r

Veh

icu

lar

Hom

icid

e/D

UI

175

0.86

%16

.48

310.

49%

11.1

91

0.03

%3.

0020

70.

69%

15.6

2

All

Oth

er V

ehic

ula

r39

0.19

%6.

8062

0.98

%3.

2811

0.36

%2.

7711

20.

37%

4.46

0

C

/S/F

Per

son

258

1.26

%21

.51

260.

41%

12.7

36

0.19

%3.

6729

00.

97%

20.3

5

C

/S/F

Pro

per

ty96

0.47

%9.

8757

0.90

%4.

8131

1.00

%4.

4818

40.

62%

7.39

C

/S/F

Soc

ieta

l/Dru

gs

135

0.66

%14

.68

711.

12%

5.17

391.

26%

4.05

245

0.82

%10

.23

E

scap

e4

0.02

%6.

5010

0.16

%3.

401

0.03

%2.

0015

0.05

%4.

13

A

ll O

ther

70

73.

46%

7.96

658

10.3

7%3.

9524

47.

88%

3.62

1,60

95.

39%

5.66

U

nse

nte

nce

d19

0.09

%N

/A0

0.00

%N

/A44

714

.43%

N/A

466

1.56

%N

/A

0

TO

TA

L20

,427

100%

16.4

16,

345

100%

5.85

3,09

810

0%3.

7929

,870

100%

12.8

7

Sen

ten

ce T

ype

D

eath

670.

95%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

670.

78%

N/A

L

ife

2,25

632

.10%

N/A

50.

45%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

2,26

126

.44%

N/A

8

5%4,

531

64.4

7%24

.08

817.

26%

15.4

27

1.72

%8.

084,

619

54.0

2%23

.91

1

-2 Y

ears

174

2.48

%1.

851,

029

92.2

9%1.

8140

098

.28%

1.73

1,60

318

.75%

1.79

* 2,3

23 o

ffen

der

s w

ith s

ente

nce

s o

f deat

h (6

7), a

nd

life (

2,25

6)

are

inclu

ded

in the

TD

OC

coun

ts; h

ow

ever,

thes

e o

ffende

rs a

re n

ot i

nclu

ded in

cal

cula

tion o

f ave

rage s

ente

nce

lengt

hs.

OTHERPERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL

Felo

ny

Inm

ate

Po

pu

latio

n:

Av

era

ge T

ota

l Sen

ten

ce L

en

gth

by

Pri

mary

Off

en

se:

FY

2014 -

2015

TD

OC

IN

HO

US

ET

DO

C B

AC

KU

PL

OC

AL

LY

SE

NT

EN

CE

DS

YS

TE

MW

IDE

Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense In-house Population Detail


.

Hom

icide

M

urde

r 15

71.

43%

22.7

96

0.26

%5.

5716

31.

23%

21.8

7

Ne

glig

ent M

ansla

ught

er8

0.07

%3.

065

0.22

%3.

2013

0.10

%3.

12

Kidn

appi

ng55

0.50

%11

.32

30.

13%

8.03

580.

44%

11.1

5

Sex

Offe

nses

Fo

rcib

le32

12.

93%

14.0

539

1.70

%5.

2036

02.

72%

13.0

9

No

n-Fo

rcib

le10

91.

00%

3.77

190.

83%

2.37

128

0.97

%3.

56

Assa

ult

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

982

8.97

%8.

2334

214

.89%

4.15

1,32

410

.00%

7.17

Oth

er A

ssau

lt10

01.

08%

2.38

431.

87%

2.28

143

1.08

%2.

35

Arso

n43

0.39

%7.

524

0.17

%4.

7547

0.35

%7.

28

Burg

lary

1,62

114

.81%

5.99

474

20.6

4%3.

852,

095

15.8

2%5.

50

Forg

ery/

Frau

d57

95.

29%

3.76

853.

70%

2.99

664

5.02

%3.

66

Larc

eny/

Thef

t1,

439

13.1

5%4.

2738

416

.72%

3.09

1,82

313

.77%

4.02

Robb

ery

Agg

rava

ted

Robb

ery

480

4.39

%13

.46

431.

87%

6.17

523

3.95

%12

.86

All O

ther

Rob

bery

318

2.91

%7.

3711

65.

05%

4.91

434

3.28

%6.

71

Drug

Offe

nses

Coc

aine

85

97.

85%

10.2

914

66.

36%

5.33

1,00

57.

59%

9.57

Oth

er D

rug

Offe

nses

2,31

721

.17%

5.93

288

12.5

4%3.

532,

605

19.6

8%5.

67

Vehi

cula

r

Veh

icula

r Hom

icide

/DUI

430.

39%

12.6

91

0.04

%10

.00

440.

33%

12.6

2

All O

ther

Veh

icula

r11

81.

08%

2.61

110.

48%

2.14

129

0.97

%2.

57

C/S/

F Pe

rson

*52

0.48

%16

.17

40.

17%

4.77

560.

42%

15.3

4

C/S/

F Pr

oper

ty*

950.

87%

5.25

341.

48%

4.47

129

0.97

%5.

05

C/S/

F So

cieta

l/Dru

gs*

123

1.12

%6.

5226

1.13

%3.

7114

91.

13%

6.03

Esca

pe14

0.13

%3.

680

0.00

%0.

0014

0.11

%3.

68

All O

ther

11

1010

.14%

3.66

224

9.75

%2.

691,

334

10.0

8%3.

50

Unkn

own

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

TOTA

L***

10,9

4310

0%6.

752,

297

100%

3.77

13,2

4010

0%6.

20

Sent

ence

Typ

e

D

eath

10.

01%

N/A

00.

00%

N/A

10.

01%

N/A

L

ife59

0.54

%N/

A0

0.00

%N/

A59

0.45

%N/

A

8

5%35

93.

28%

18.9

24

0.17

%9.

3436

32.

74%

18.9

1

1

-2 Y

ears

2,32

521

.25%

1.79

863

37.5

7%1.

703,

188

24.0

8%1.

77

* C/S

/F re

fers

to n

on-s

ubst

antiv

e of

fens

es s

uch

as c

onsp

iracy

, sol

icita

tion,

facil

itatio

n, a

idin

g, a

nd a

betti

ng, e

tc.

354

unpr

oces

sed

judg

men

t ord

ers

-- to

tal a

dmiss

ions

: 13

,596

.59

offe

nder

s wi

th lif

e se

nten

ces

and

1 of

fend

er w

ith a

dea

th s

ente

nce

are

inclu

ded

in th

e TD

OC

coun

ts, b

ut a

re n

ot in

clude

d in

the

calcu

latio

n of

ave

rage

sen

tenc

e le

ngth

s.

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL OTHER

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f TDO

C To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Num

ber o

f O

ffend

ers

% O

f Loc

al

Tota

l

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Y

ears

)

Syst

em-w

ide

Tota

l

Aver

age

Sent

ence

Len

gth

by P

rimar

y O

ffens

e G

roup

: FY

2014

- 20

15Fe

lony

Adm

issi

ons

PRIM

ARY

OFF

ENSE

G

ROUP

TDO

C SE

NTEN

CED

LOCA

LLY

SENT

ENCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

% O

f Sys

tem

To

tal

Aver

age

Sent

ence

(Yea

rs)

Average Sentence Length by Primary Offense Admissions


Hom

icid

e

Mur

der

230

4.00

%19

.94

120.

20%

9.77

50.

16%

2.68

247

1.67

%19

.09

Negl

igen

t Man

slau

ghte

r6

0.10

%3.

658

0.13

%1.

394

0.13

%2.

8518

0.12

%2.

53

Kidn

appi

ng36

0.63

%11

.20

110.

18%

8.00

70.

23%

2.60

540.

37%

9.49

Sex

Offe

nses

Forc

ible

292

5.07

%11

.72

621.

04%

7.69

431.

40%

4.37

397

2.69

%10

.32

Non-

Forc

ible

440.

76%

3.82

711.

19%

1.19

190.

62%

1.72

134

0.91

%2.

75

Assa

ult

Agg

rava

ted

Assa

ult

589

10.2

4%6.

6040

66.

82%

3.66

356

11.6

1%2.

701,

351

9.14

%4.

70

Othe

r Ass

ault

450.

78%

3.24

881.

48%

2.06

311.

01%

1.20

164

1.11

%2.

22

Arso

n29

0.50

%6.

4516

0.27

%3.

037

0.23

%1.

8452

0.35

%4.

81

Burg

lary

824

14.3

2%5.

1089

415

.02%

3.12

617

20.1

2%2.

532,

335

15.8

0%3.

67

Forg

ery/

Frau

d19

23.

34%

4.31

428

7.19

%7.

1913

54.

40%

2.08

755

5.11

%2.

90

Larc

eny/

Thef

t56

49.

80%

3.90

927

15.5

7%2.

5243

514

.19%

2.05

1,92

613

.04%

2.83

Robb

ery

Aggr

avat

ed R

obbe

ry50

98.

85%

9.87

991.

66%

7.94

391.

27%

3.19

647

4.38

%9.

17

All O

ther

Rob

bery

201

3.49

%5.

9711

92.

00%

3.99

123

4.01

%3.

1644

33.

00%

4.67

Drug

Offe

nses

Coca

ine

Offe

nses

692

12.0

3%7.

8036

46.

11%

5.60

286

9.33

%4.

071,

342

9.08

%6.

44

Othe

r Dru

g Of

fens

es88

115

.31%

4.75

1,46

024

.52%

2.87

516

16.8

3%2.

402,

857

19.3

4%3.

37

Vehi

cula

r

Vehi

cula

r Hom

icid

e/DU

I38

0.66

%6.

5414

0.24

%7.

315

0.16

%2.

3057

0.39

%6.

36

All O

ther

Veh

icul

ar39

0.68

%2.

5810

01.

68%

2.07

170.

55%

2.13

156

1.06

%2.

21

C/S/

F Pe

rson

450.

78%

8.46

100.

17%

6.61

50.

16%

2.30

600.

41%

7.57

C/S/

F Pr

oper

ty67

1.16

%4.

5553

0.89

%2.

8839

1.27

%2.

6415

91.

08%

3.54

C/S/

F So

ciet

al/D

rugs

651.

13%

4.55

791.

33%

2.84

331.

08%

2.28

177

1.20

%3.

38

Esca

pe10

0.17

%2.

9211

0.18

%3.

720

0.00

%N/

A21

0.14

%3.

37

All O

ther

356

6.19

%3.

4272

212

.13%

2.10

344

11.2

2%1.

751,

422

9.63

%2.

35

Unkn

own

00.

00%

0.00

00.

00%

0.00

00.

00%

0.00

00.

00%

0.00

TOTA

L5,

754

100.

0%6.

695,

954

100.

0%3.

123,

066

100.

0%2.

5314

,774

100.

0%4.

41

Aver

age

time

serv

ed d

oes

not i

nclud

e te

n (3

) mod

ified

judge

men

t ord

ers.

Tot

al re

lease

s ar

e 14

,777

OTHER

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%Av

erag

e Ti

me

Serv

ed

(Yea

rs)

PERSON PROPERTY SOCIETAL

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%Av

erag

e Ti

me

Serv

ed

(Yea

rs)

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%Av

erag

e Ti

me

Serv

ed

(Yea

rs)

Aver

age

Tim

e Se

rved

by

Loca

tion:

FY

2014

- 20

15Fe

lony

Rel

ease

s

Prim

ary

Offe

nse

Cate

gory

TDOC

INHO

USE

TDOC

BAC

KUP

LOCA

LLY

SENT

ENCE

DSY

STEM

WID

E

Num

ber o

f Of

fend

ers

%Av

erag

e Ti

me

Serv

ed

(Yea

rs)

Average Time Served by Primary Offense

Releases by Location


.

Homi

cide

Murde

r105

2.51%

23.96

1122.2

7%14

.5425

8.59%

20.69

50.1

2%7.3

80

0.00%

0.00

247

1.67%

19.09

Negli

gent

Mans

laugh

ter1

0.02%

6.50

100.2

0%3.0

90

0.00%

0.00

70.1

7%0.9

30

0.00%

0.00

180.1

2%2.5

3

Kidna

pping

130.3

1%16.

8528

0.57%

7.44

41.3

7%15.

307

0.17%

4.27

20.1

7%2.7

054

0.37%

9.49

Sex O

ffens

es

Forci

ble215

5.14%

9.82

801.6

2%13

.9415

5.15%

15.47

821.9

7%7.3

95

0.42%

4.93

397

2.69%

10.32

Non-F

orcibl

e1

0.02%

2.90

771.5

6%3.5

21

0.34%

N/A51

1.23%

1.66

40.3

3%1.7

013

40.9

1%2.7

5

Assau

lt Aggra

vated

Assau

lt282

6.74%

6.12

65613.

28%5.1

126

8.93%

4.33

305

7.33%

2.85

826.8

6%3.3

21,3

519.1

4%4.7

0

Othe

r Assa

ult18

0.43%

3.51

581.1

7%2.9

03

1.03%

0.80

761.8

3%1.5

59

0.75%

1.49

164

1.11%

2.22

Arson

110.2

6%5.3

923

0.47%

6.57

00.0

0%0.0

015

0.36%

2.16

30.2

5%1.6

052

0.35%

4.81

Burgl

ary674

16.11%

4.42

83816.

96%4.3

537

12.71

%3.6

556

813.

64%2.2

2218

18.24

%2.3

82,3

3515.

80%3.6

7

Forge

ry/Fra

ud138

3.30%

3.97

1984.0

1%3.7

715

5.15%

2.37

339

8.14%

2.11

655.4

4%2.1

675

55.1

1%2.9

0

Larce

ny/Th

eft381

9.10%

3.82

62312.

61%3.4

734

11.68

%2.8

571

617.

20%1.8

8172

14.39

%2.0

71,9

2613.

04%2.8

3

Robb

ery Aggra

vated

Robb

ery288

6.88%

10.04

3166.4

0%8.6

415

5.15%

9.56

210.5

0%6.9

77

0.59%

2.50

647

4.38%

9.17

All Ot

her R

obbe

ry150

3.58%

4.75

1823.6

8%5.5

612

4.12%

3.45

751.8

0%3.1

324

2.01%

2.35

443

3.00%

4.67

Drug

Offen

ses

Coca

ine Of

fenses

62014.

81%6.9

0340

6.88%

7.92

258.5

9%4.7

520

34.8

8%4.4

8154

12.89

%3.8

61,3

429.0

8%6.4

4

Othe

r Drug

Offen

ses892

21.31%

4.12

73914.

96%4.2

351

17.53

%3.7

284

420.

27%2.1

8331

27.70

%2.3

32,8

5719.

34%3.3

7

Vehic

ular

Vehic

ular H

omici

de/DU

I25

0.60%

6.30

250.5

1%6.7

41

0.34%

19.90

40.1

0%3.8

52

0.17%

0.65

570.3

9%6.3

6

All Ot

her V

ehicu

lar12

0.29%

2.70

561.1

3%2.9

50

0.00%

0.00

842.0

2%1.5

74

0.33%

3.90

156

1.06%

2.21

C/S/F

Perso

n27

0.65%

9.73

240.4

9%7.4

01

0.34%

2.50

70.1

7%1.6

01

0.08%

2.50

600.4

1%7.5

7

C/S/F

Prope

rty39

0.93%

4.01

541.0

9%4.7

91

0.34%

1.30

551.3

2%2.0

810

0.84%

2.85

159

1.08%

3.54

C/S/F

Socie

tal/Dr

ugs

571.3

6%3.2

946

0.93%

5.37

41.3

7%6.6

356

1.35%

1.90

141.1

7%2.4

017

71.2

0%3.3

8

Escap

e5

0.12%

2.17

100.2

0%4.8

10

0.00%

0.00

60.1

4%1.2

00

0.00%

0.00

210.1

4%3.3

7

All Ot

her

2315.5

2%2.9

4445

9.01%

3.28

217.2

2%1.9

663

715.

30%1.2

088

7.36%

1.93

1,422

9.63%

2.35

Unkn

own

00.0

0%0.0

00

0.00%

0.00

00.0

0%0.0

00

0.00%

0.00

00.0

0%0.0

00

0.00%

0.00

TOTA

L4,1

85100

.00%

5.92

4,940

100.00

%5.1

8291

100.00

%6.2

5416

310

0.00%

2.31

1,195

100.00

%2.5

414

,774

100.0

0%4.4

1

Avera

ge tim

e serv

ed do

es not

includ

e ten

(3) m

odified

judge

ment

orders

. Tota

l relea

ses ar

e 14,7

77

SOCIETAL OTHERPERSON PROPERTY

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved (

Years

)%

Avera

ge Ti

me

Serve

d (Ye

ars)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

%Av

erage

Time

Se

rved

(Years

)

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

Felon

y Rele

ases

Avera

ge Ti

me Se

rved b

y Rele

ase T

ype:

FY 20

14 - 2

015

PRIM

ARY O

FFEN

SE GR

OUP

PARO

LEEX

PIRAT

IONOT

HER

PROB

ATION

COMM

UNITY

CORR

ECTIO

NSSY

STEM

WIDE

Numb

er of

Offen

ders

Average Time Served by Primary Offense

Releases by Type


TYPE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Parole Violtr. Return 1,704 15.6% 179 7.8% 14 3.9% 1,897 14.0%Probation Violltr Return 2,141 19.6% 446 19.4% 86 24.2% 2,673 19.7%Community Corr. Return 797 7.3% 46 2.0% 22 6.2% 865 6.4%New Commit 6,190 56.6% 1,592 69.3% 224 62.9% 8,006 58.9%Escape Return & Other 111 1.0% 34 1.5% 10 2.8% 155 1.1%

TOTAL 10,943 2,297 356 13,596

TYPE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

Parole 2,717 47.2% 1,031 17.3% 437 14.3% 0 0.0% 4,185 28.3%Probation 718 12.5% 2,487 41.8% 958 31.2% 1 33.3% 4,164 28.2%Community Corrections 32 0.6% 552 9.3% 611 19.9% 2 66.7% 1,197 8.1%Sentence Expiration 2,191 38.1% 1,736 29.2% 1,013 33.0% 0 0.0% 4,940 33.4%Death 62 1.1% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 63 0.4%Other 34 0.6% 148 2.5% 46 1.5% 0 0.0% 228 1.5%

TOTAL 5,754 5,954 3,066 3 14,777

INMATE ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

In FY 2015, admissions decreased 1,579 (10.41%) and releases decreased 1,082 (6.82%) since last year.

Felony Inmate Admissions by Type: FY 2014-2015

Felony Inmate Releases by Type: FY 2014-2015


.

TDOC % BACKUP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

65+ 95 1.7% 27 0.5% 13 0.4% 0 0.0% 135 0.9%60-64 105 1.8% 59 1.0% 37 1.2% 0 0.0% 201 1.4%55-59 270 4.7% 137 2.3% 107 3.5% 0 0.0% 514 3.5%50-54 459 8.0% 296 5.0% 175 5.7% 0 0 930 6.3%45-49 568 9.9% 443 7.4% 238 7.8% 0 0.0% 1,249 8.5%40-44 706 12.3% 643 10.8% 313 10.2% 1 33.3% 1,663 11.3%35-39 897 15.6% 910 15.3% 391 12.8% 1 33.3% 2,199 14.9%30-34 1,093 19.0% 1189 20.0% 551 18.0% 0 0.0% 2,833 19.2%25-29 1,054 18.3% 1355 22.8% 609 19.9% 0 0.0% 3,018 20.4%20-24 498 8.7% 859 14.4% 605 19.7% 1 33.3% 1,963 13.3%18-19 9 0.2% 35 0.6% 26 0.8% 0 0.0% 70 0.5%<18 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 0.0%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 5,754 5,954 3,066 3 14,777

RACE TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 2,210 38.4% 1,290 21.7% 1,999 65.2% 2 66.7% 5,501 37.2%White 3,432 59.6% 4,585 77.0% 1,000 32.6% 1 33.3% 9,018 61.0%Asian 11 0.2% 11 0.2% 6 0.2% 0 0.0% 28 0.2%

Hispanic 95 1.7% 65 1.1% 58 1.9% 0 0.0% 218 1.5%Native American 6 0.1% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 0 0.0% 12 0.1%

TOTAL 5,754 5,954 3,066 3 14,777

Sex TDOC % BACK-UP % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 5,117 88.9% 4,604 77.3% 2,603 84.9% 3 100.0% 12,327 83.4%Female 637 11.1% 1,350 22.7% 463 15.1% 0 0.0% 2,450 16.6%

TOTAL 5,754 5,954 3,066 3 14,777

Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %65+ 53 0.5% 10 0.4% 1 0.3% 64 0.5%

60-64 100 0.9% 27 1.2% 3 0.8% 130 1.0%55-59 292 2.7% 72 3.1% 7 2.0% 371 2.7%50-54 557 5.1% 131 5.7% 17 4.8% 705 5.2%45-49 819 7.5% 161 7.0% 25 7.0% 1,005 7.4%40-44 1,216 11.1% 194 8.4% 46 12.9% 1,456 10.7%35-39 1,645 15.0% 257 11.2% 63 17.7% 1,965 14.5%30-34 2,173 19.9% 354 15.4% 76 21.3% 2,603 19.1%25-29 2,242 20.5% 477 20.8% 61 17.1% 2,780 20.4%20-24 1,655 15.1% 528 23.0% 52 14.6% 2,235 16.4%18-19 166 1.5% 83 3.6% 4 1.1% 253 1.9%<18 25 0.2% 3 0.1% 1 0.3% 29 0.2%

Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0%TOTAL 10,943 2,297 356 13,596

RACE TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 3,134 28.6% 1,697 73.9% 124 34.8% 4,955 36.4%White 7,629 69.7% 552 24.0% 230 64.6% 8,411 61.9%Asian 14 0.1% 5 0.2% 1 0.3% 20 0.1%

Hispanic 161 1.5% 42 1.8% 1 0.3% 204 1.5%Native American 5 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 0.0%

TOTAL 10,943 2,297 356 13,596

Sex TDOC % LOCAL % UNKNOWN % SYSTEMWIDE %Male 9,004 82.3% 2,050 89.2% 292 82.0% 11,346 83.5%

Female 1,939 17.7% 247 10.8% 64 18.0% 2,250 16.5%

TOTAL 10,943 2,297 356 13,596


Felony Inmate Admissions by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2014– 2015

Felony Inmate Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2014 – 2015


Inm

ate

Ad

mis

sio

ns

by

Geo

gra

ph

ical

Reg

ion

: F

Y 2

014–

2015

TDO

CLO

CAL

SYST

EMW

IDE

Wes

t18

8615

4334

29

Mid

dle

4039

705

4744

East

5018

4950

67

The

sys

tem

wid

e t

ota

ls in

the a

bove

cha

rt d

o n

ot

incl

ude 3

56

unp

roce

ssed ju

dg

ment

ord

ers

. T

ota

l adm

issi

ons

are

13,5

96

.


.

COUNTY # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # %

ANDERSON 187 1.7% 0 0.0% 187 1.4% LAUDERDALE 45 0.4% 2 0.1% 47 0.3%

BEDFORD 136 1.2% 1 0.0% 137 1.0% LAWRENCE 145 1.3% 4 0.2% 149 1.1%

BENTON 25 0.2% 0 0.0% 25 0.2% LEWIS 29 0.3% 0 0.0% 29 0.2%

BLEDSOE 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1% LINCOLN 75 0.7% 1 0.0% 76 0.6%

BLOUNT 247 2.3% 3 0.1% 250 1.8% LOUDON 54 0.5% 0 0.0% 54 0.4%

BRADLEY 241 2.2% 1 0.0% 242 1.8% McMINN 173 1.6% 1 0.0% 174 1.3%

CAMPBELL 89 0.8% 2 0.1% 91 0.7% McNAIRY 22 0.2% 0 0.0% 22 0.2%

CANNON 25 0.2% 1 0.0% 26 0.2% MACON 50 0.5% 1 0.0% 51 0.4%

CARROLL 43 0.4% 0 0.0% 43 0.3% MADISON 314 2.9% 3 0.1% 317 2.3%

CARTER 128 1.2% 0 0.0% 128 0.9% MARION 65 0.6% 2 0.1% 67 0.5%

CHEATHAM 61 0.6% 1 0.0% 62 0.5% MARSHALL 49 0.4% 0 0.0% 49 0.4%

CHESTER 29 0.3% 1 0.0% 30 0.2% MAURY 161 1.5% 4 0.2% 165 1.2%

CLAIBORNE 89 0.8% 2 0.1% 91 0.7% MEIGS 15 0.1% 0 0.0% 15 0.1%

CLAY 19 0.2% 1 0.0% 20 0.1% MONROE 82 0.7% 1 0.0% 83 0.6%

COCKE 59 0.5% 0 0.0% 59 0.4% MONTGOMERY 113 1.0% 1 0.0% 114 0.8%

COFFEE 141 1.3% 11 0.5% 152 1.1% MOORE 23 0.2% 0 0.0% 23 0.2%

CROCKETT 24 0.2% 1 0.0% 25 0.2% MORGAN 19 0.2% 0 0.0% 19 0.1%

CUMBERLAND 175 1.6% 2 0.1% 177 1.3% OBION 46 0.4% 1 0.0% 47 0.3%

DAVIDSON 772 7.1% 651 28.3% 1423 10.5% OVERTON 42 0.4% 1 0.0% 43 0.3%

DECATUR 10 0.1% 1 0.0% 11 0.1% PERRY 14 0.1% 0 0.0% 14 0.1%

DEKALB 60 0.5% 1 0.0% 61 0.4% PICKETT 5 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 0.0%

DICKSON 87 0.8% 0 0.0% 87 0.6% POLK 59 0.5% 0 0.0% 59 0.4%

DYER 115 1.1% 1 0.0% 116 0.9% PUTNAM 174 1.6% 4 0.2% 178 1.3%

FAYETTE 42 0.4% 0 0.0% 42 0.3% RHEA 30 0.3% 2 0.1% 32 0.2%

FENTRESS 51 0.5% 1 0.0% 52 0.4% ROANE 51 0.5% 0 0.0% 51 0.4%

FRANKLIN 98 0.9% 1 0.0% 99 0.7% ROBERTSON 99 0.9% 0 0.0% 99 0.7%

GIBSON 104 1.0% 0 0.0% 104 0.8% RUTHERFORD 401 3.7% 6 0.3% 407 3.0%

GILES 27 0.2% 1 0.0% 28 0.2% SCOTT 51 0.5% 0 0.0% 51 0.4%

GRAINGER 54 0.5% 1 0.0% 55 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 33 0.3% 0 0.0% 33 0.2%

GREENE 157 1.4% 6 0.3% 163 1.2% SEVIER 156 1.4% 2 0.1% 158 1.2%

GRUNDY 55 0.5% 0 0.0% 55 0.4% SHELBY 675 6.2% 1,531 66.7% 2206 16.2%

HAMBLEN 278 2.5% 16 0.7% 294 2.2% SMITH 47 0.4% 0 0.0% 47 0.3%

HAMILTON 472 4.3% 2 0.1% 474 3.5% STEWART 24 0.2% 0 0.0% 24 0.2%

HANCOCK 45 0.4% 0 0.0% 45 0.3% SULLIVAN 501 4.6% 2 0.1% 503 3.7%

HARDEMAN 62 0.6% 1 0.0% 63 0.5% SUMNER 285 2.6% 5 0.2% 290 2.1%

HARDIN 45 0.4% 0 0.0% 45 0.3% TIPTON 88 0.8% 1 0.0% 89 0.7%

HAWKINS 110 1.0% 0 0.0% 110 0.8% TROUSDALE 24 0.2% 0 0.0% 24 0.2%

HAYWOOD 32 0.3% 0 0.0% 32 0.2% UNICOI 29 0.3% 0 0.0% 29 0.2%

HENDERSON 82 0.7% 0 0.0% 82 0.6% UNION 36 0.3% 0 0.0% 36 0.3%

HENRY 28 0.3% 0 0.0% 28 0.2% VAN BUREN 13 0.1% 0 0.0% 13 0.1%

HICKMAN 50 0.5% 0 0.0% 50 0.4% WARREN 84 0.8% 3 0.1% 87 0.6%

HOUSTON 17 0.2% 0 0.0% 17 0.1% WASHINGTON 241 2.2% 1 0.0% 242 1.8%

HUMPHREYS 20 0.2% 0 0.0% 20 0.1% WAYNE 48 0.4% 2 0.1% 50 0.4%

JACKSON 18 0.2% 0 0.0% 18 0.1% WEAKLEY 39 0.4% 0 0.0% 39 0.3%

JEFFERSON 134 1.2% 2 0.1% 136 1.0% WHITE 76 0.7% 0 0.0% 76 0.6%

JOHNSON 50 0.5% 0 0.0% 50 0.4% WILLIAMSON 168 1.5% 1 0.0% 169 1.2%KNOX 1015 9.3% 3 0.1% 1018 7.5% WILSON 133 1.2% 0 0.0% 133 1.0%

LAKE 16 0.1% 0 0.0% 16 0.1% Unknown 356 3%

TOTAL 10,943 100% 2,297 100% 13,596 100%

TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE

Inmate Admissions by County of Conviction: FY 2014- 2015


COUNTY # % # % # % # % COUNTY # % # % # % # %

ANDERSON 124 0.6% 119 1.9% 6 0.2% 249 0.8% LAUDERDALE 104 0.5% 29 0.5% 12 0.4% 145 0.5%

BEDFORD 284 1.4% 62 1.0% 2 0.1% 348 1.2% LAWRENCE 116 0.6% 110 1.7% 5 0.2% 231 0.8%

BENTON 28 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 46 0.2% LEWIS 36 0.2% 15 0.2% 2 0.1% 53 0.2%

BLEDSOE 20 0.1% 14 0.2% 1 0.0% 35 0.1% LINCOLN 118 0.6% 61 1.0% 7 0.2% 186 0.6%

BLOUNT 288 1.4% 142 2.2% 9 0.3% 439 1.5% LOUDON 62 0.3% 44 0.7% 11 0.4% 117 0.4%

BRADLEY 302 1.5% 153 2.4% 4 0.1% 459 1.5% McMINN 131 0.6% 154 2.4% 6 0.2% 291 1.0%

CAMPBELL 148 0.7% 77 1.2% 0 0.0% 225 0.8% McNAIRY 41 0.2% 21 0.3% 5 0.2% 67 0.2%

CANNON 58 0.3% 8 0.1% 1 0.0% 67 0.2% MACON 48 0.2% 40 0.6% 1 0.0% 89 0.3%

CARROLL 67 0.3% 38 0.6% 2 0.1% 107 0.4% MADISON 771 3.8% 66 1.0% 5 0.2% 842 2.8%

CARTER 93 0.5% 101 1.6% 22 0.7% 216 0.7% MARION 71 0.3% 58 0.9% 4 0.1% 133 0.4%

CHEATHAM 83 0.4% 34 0.5% 5 0.2% 122 0.4% MARSHALL 177 0.9% 49 0.8% 2 0.1% 228 0.8%

CHESTER 46 0.2% 27 0.4% 1 0.0% 74 0.2% MAURY 302 1.5% 135 2.1% 3 0.1% 440 1.5%

CLAIBORNE 81 0.4% 91 1.4% 8 0.3% 180 0.6% MEIGS 16 0.1% 18 0.3% 0 0.0% 34 0.1%

CLAY 14 0.1% 24 0.4% 0 0.0% 38 0.1% MONROE 128 0.6% 61 1.0% 1 0.0% 190 0.6%

COCKE 143 0.7% 38 0.6% 1 0.0% 182 0.6% MONTGOMERY 359 1.8% 91 1.4% 6 0.2% 456 1.5%

COFFEE 274 1.3% 43 0.7% 7 0.2% 324 1.1% MOORE 27 0.1% 9 0.1% 2 0.1% 38 0.1%

CROCKETT 47 0.2% 27 0.4% 1 0.0% 75 0.3% MORGAN 27 0.1% 8 0.1% 1 0.0% 36 0.1%

CUMBERLAND 160 0.8% 55 0.9% 4 0.1% 219 0.7% OBION 78 0.4% 38 0.6% 1 0.0% 117 0.4%

DAVIDSON 3,427 16.8% 246 3.9% 727 23.5% 4400 14.7% OVERTON 37 0.2% 36 0.6% 1 0.0% 74 0.2%

DECATUR 22 0.1% 6 0.1% 2 0.1% 30 0.1% PERRY 30 0.1% 7 0.1% 0 0.0% 37 0.1%

DEKALB 51 0.2% 52 0.8% 2 0.1% 105 0.4% PICKETT 6 0.0% 9 0.1% 0 0.0% 15 0.1%

DICKSON 117 0.6% 73 1.2% 9 0.3% 199 0.7% POLK 34 0.2% 44 0.7% 2 0.1% 80 0.3%

DYER 182 0.9% 86 1.4% 1 0.0% 269 0.9% PUTNAM 190 0.9% 114 1.8% 2 0.1% 306 1.0%

FAYETTE 51 0.2% 43 0.7% 9 0.3% 103 0.3% RHEA 81 0.4% 16 0.3% 1 0.0% 98 0.3%

FENTRESS 59 0.3% 37 0.6% 1 0.0% 97 0.3% ROANE 65 0.3% 22 0.3% 9 0.3% 96 0.3%

FRANKLIN 118 0.6% 43 0.7% 15 0.5% 176 0.6% ROBERTSON 85 0.4% 89 1.4% 11 0.4% 185 0.6%

GIBSON 109 0.5% 94 1.5% 5 0.2% 208 0.7% RUTHERFORD 528 2.6% 188 3.0% 14 0.5% 730 2.4%

GILES 97 0.5% 16 0.3% 4 0.1% 117 0.4% SCOTT 87 0.4% 52 0.8% 1 0.0% 140 0.5%

GRAINGER 79 0.4% 38 0.6% 2 0.1% 119 0.4% SEQUATCHIE 53 0.3% 36 0.6% 1 0.0% 90 0.3%

GREENE 133 0.7% 95 1.5% 6 0.2% 234 0.8% SEVIER 318 1.6% 156 2.5% 16 0.5% 490 1.6%

GRUNDY 69 0.3% 34 0.5% 7 0.2% 110 0.4% SHELBY 3203 15.7% 395 6.2% 1,439 46.4% 5037 16.9%

HAMBLEN 212 1.0% 108 1.7% 22 0.7% 342 1.1% SMITH 47 0.2% 41 0.6% 0 0.0% 88 0.3%

HAMILTON 760 3.7% 92 1.4% 12 0.4% 864 2.9% STEWART 17 0.1% 18 0.3% 3 0.1% 38 0.1%

HANCOCK 31 0.2% 39 0.6% 0 0.0% 70 0.2% SULLIVAN 742 3.6% 276 4.3% 25 0.8% 1043 3.5%

HARDEMAN 71 0.3% 40 0.6% 5 0.2% 116 0.4% SUMNER 355 1.7% 291 4.6% 39 1.3% 685 2.3%

HARDIN 62 0.3% 43 0.7% 5 0.2% 110 0.4% TIPTON 182 0.9% 31 0.5% 15 0.5% 228 0.8%

HAWKINS 98 0.5% 111 1.7% 2 0.1% 211 0.7% TROUSDALE 22 0.1% 26 0.4% 0 0.0% 48 0.2%

HAYWOOD 42 0.2% 43 0.7% 1 0.0% 86 0.3% UNICOI 41 0.2% 14 0.2% 6 0.2% 61 0.2%

HENDERSON 74 0.4% 84 1.3% 2 0.1% 160 0.5% UNION 70 0.3% 22 0.3% 1 0.0% 93 0.3%

HENRY 67 0.3% 31 0.5% 0 0.0% 98 0.3% VAN BUREN 14 0.1% 9 0.1% 1 0.0% 24 0.1%

HICKMAN 58 0.3% 38 0.6% 0 0.0% 96 0.3% WARREN 169 0.8% 43 0.7% 7 0.2% 219 0.7%

HOUSTON 25 0.1% 14 0.2% 2 0.1% 41 0.1% WASHINGTON 212 1.0% 149 2.3% 36 1.2% 397 1.3%

HUMPHREYS 28 0.1% 20 0.0% 0 0.0% 48 0.2% WAYNE 39 0.2% 39 0.6% 3 0.1% 81 0.3%

JACKSON 23 0.1% 15 0.2% 0 0.0% 38 0.1% WEAKLEY 45 0.2% 37 0.6% 0 0.0% 82 0.3%

JEFFERSON 204 1.0% 106 1.7% 4 0.1% 314 1.1% WHITE 66 0.3% 54 0.9% 2 0.1% 122 0.4%

JOHNSON 50 0.2% 19 0.3% 8 0.3% 77 0.3% WILLIAMSON 241 1.2% 83 1.3% 0 0.0% 324 1.1%

KNOX 1999 9.8% 153 2.4% 15 0.5% 2167 7.3% WILSON 208 1.0% 137 2.2% 0 0.0% 345 1.2%

LAKE 31 0.2% 14 0.2% 1 0.0% 46 0.2% PENDING 19 0% 0 0% 446 14% 465 1.6%

TOTAL 20,427 100% 6,345 100% 3098 100% 29,870 100%

TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE TDOC BACKUP LOCAL SYSTEMWIDE

Felon Inmate Population by County of Conviction: FY 2014 – 2015


.

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

Po

pu

lati

on

Fiscal Year

Fiscal Year-End Community Supervision Felon PopulationFY 2000 - 2015

Community Corrections

Probation

Parole

Total Community Supervision

Parole 13,436Community Corrections 8,105

Total 79,686

Probation 58,145

Total Community Supervision Felon Population: June 30, 2015

Total Community Supervision Population

Source: Tennessee Felon Population Updates


65+2.0%

60-642.5%

55-595.0%

50-547.8%

45-499.4%

40-4412.0%

35-3915.2%

30-3417.1%

25-2916.8%

20-2411.5%

18-190.7%

<180.0%

65+ 1,008 1.7% 512 3.8% 75 0.9% 1,595 2.0%60-64 1,297 2.2% 561 4.2% 123 1.5% 1,981 2.5%55-59 2,779 4.8% 903 6.7% 338 4.2% 4,020 5.0%50-54 4,333 7.5% 1395 10.4% 517 6.4% 6,245 7.8%45-49 5,234 4.7% 1498 11.1% 720 8.9% 7,452 9.4%40-44 6,723 11.6% 1855 13.8% 1,006 12.4% 9,584 12.0%35-39 8,475 14.6% 2268 16.9% 1363 16.8% 12,106 15.2%30-34 9,796 16.8% 2291 17.1% 1560 19.2% 13,647 17.1%25-29 10,221 17.6% 1626 12.1% 1511 18.6% 13,358 16.8%20-24 7,767 13.4% 523 3.9% 863 10.6% 9,153 11.5%18-19 506 0.9% 3 0.0% 29 0.4% 538 0.7%<18 6 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 0.0%Unknown 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0%TOTAL 58,145 96% 13,436 100% 8,105 100% 79,686 100%Source: Tennessee Offender Management Information System

Probation % Parole %Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION DEMOGRAPHICS: AGE, SEX, RACE

Community Supervision Population by Age (Systemwide) June 30, 2015


.

Black34%

White63%

Other3%

Male

Black 15,239 35.7% 5,222 44.8% 1,919 32.8% 22,380

White 25,793 60.4% 5,984 51.3% 3,802 65.0% 35,579

Asian 244 0.6% 45 0.4% 12 0.2% 301

Hispanic 1,385 3.2% 400 3.4% 115 2.0% 1,900

Native American 62 0.1% 12 0.1% 4 0.1% 78Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 0.0% 1

Total Male 42,723 100.0% 11,663 100.0% 5,853 100.0% 60,239

Female

Black 3807 24.7% 431 24.3% 375 16.7% 4613White 11373 73.7% 1313 74.1% 1859 82.5% 14545

Asian 41 0.3% 3 0.2% 0 0.0% 44Hispanic 182 1.2% 22 1.2% 14 0.6% 218Native American 19 0.1% 4 0.2% 4 0.2% 27Unknown 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0Total Female 15,422 100.0% 1,773 100.0% 2,252 100.0% 19,447

TOTAL 58,145 73.0% 13,436 16.9% 8,105 10.2% 79,686

% Systemwide



Community Supervision Population by Sex and Race (Systemwide) June 30, 2015

Community Supervision Population by Sex, Race, and Type of Supervision

Male76%

Female24%


Probation % Parole %Community Corrections % SYSTEMWIDE %

65+ 192 1.1% 54 1.2% 17 0.6% 263 1.0%60-64 260 1.4% 74 1.7% 36 1.2% 370 1.4%55-59 614 3.4% 185 4.2% 75 2.4% 874 3.4%50-54 1,031 5.7% 335 7.5% 159 5.2% 1,525 6.0%45-49 1,275 7.1% 424 9.5% 214 6.9% 1,913 7.5%40-44 1,761 9.8% 562 12.6% 319 10.4% 2,642 10.3%35-39 2,155 12.0% 749 16.8% 427 13.9% 3,331 13.0%30-34 2,936 16.3% 881 19.8% 594 19.3% 4,411 17.3%25-29 3,464 19.2% 782 17.5% 646 21.0% 4,892 19.2%20-24 3,541 19.7% 405 9.1% 534 17.3% 4,480 17.5%18-19 750 4.2% 6 0.1% 57 1.9% 813 3.2%<18 19 0.1% 0 0.0% 2 0.1% 21 0.1%TOTAL 17,998 4,457 3,080 25,535

RACE Probation % Parole %Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 6,070 33.7% 1,782 40.0% 801 26.0% 8,653 33.9%White 11,501 63.9% 2,593 58.2% 2245 72.9% 16,339 64.0%Asian 86 0.5% 11 0.2% 3 0.1% 100 0.4%


TOTAL 17,998 4,457 3,080 25,535

Sex Probation % Parole %Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 13,188 73.3% 3,813 85.6% 2167 70.4% 19,168 75.1%Female 4,810 26.7% 644 14.4% 913 29.6% 6,367 24.9%

TOTAL 17,998 4,457 3,080 25,535


% SYSTEMWIDE %

65+ 257 1.5% 79 1.8% 15 0.7% 351 1.5%60-64 346 2.0% 99 2.2% 19 0.9% 464 1.9%55-59 698 4.0% 202 4.5% 63 2.8% 963 4.0%50-54 1,120 6.5% 340 7.6% 99 4.5% 1,559 6.5%45-49 1,401 8.1% 485 10.8% 165 7.5% 2,051 8.6%40-44 1,796 10.4% 615 13.7% 239 10.8% 2,650 11.1%35-39 2,350 13.6% 823 18.3% 319 14.4% 3,492 14.6%30-34 3,052 17.7% 811 18.1% 458 20.7% 4,321 18.0%25-29 3,472 20.1% 749 16.7% 477 21.5% 4,698 19.6%20-24 2,665 15.4% 285 6.3% 333 15.0% 3,283 13.7%18-19 108 0.6% 2 0.0% 27 1.2% 137 0.6%<18 6 0.0% 1 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 0.0%TOTAL 17,271 4,491 2,214 23,976

RACE Probation % Parole %Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Black 5,687 32.9% 1,919 42.7% 559 25.2% 8,165 34.1%White 11,230 65.0% 2,509 55.9% 1,633 73.8% 15,372 64.1%Asian 56 0.3% 7 0.2% 2 0.1% 65 0.3%


TOTAL 17,271 4,491 2,214 23,976

Sex Probation % Parole %Community Corrections

% SYSTEMWIDE %

Male 12,645 73.2% 3,817 85.0% 1,654 74.7% 18,116 75.6%Female 4,626 26.8% 674 15.0% 560 25.3% 5,860 24.4%

TOTAL 17,271 4,491 2,214 23,976

Community Supervision Admissions by Age, Race and Sex: FY 2014-2015

Community Supervision Releases by Age, Race, and Sex: FY 2014-2015


.

TYPE Probation % Parole %Communi

ty %

SYSTEMWIDE

%

Death 342 2.0% 150 3.3% 68 3.1% 560 2.3%Discharges & Expirations 11,139 64.5% 2,592 57.7% 559 25.2% 14,290 59.6%Revocation, Positive Drug Test 384 2.2% 40 0.9% 217 9.8% 641 2.7%Revocation, New Charge 2,780 16.1% 963 21.4% 437 19.7% 4,180 17.4%Revocation, New Charge Pending 564 3.3% 371 8.3% 101 4.6% 1,036 4.3%Revocation, Technical 2,062 11.9% 375 8.4% 832 37.6% 3,269 13.6%

TOTAL 17,271 4,491 2,214 23,976

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Probation Parole CommunityCorrections

Systemwide

Community SupervisionFiscal Year 2015

Admissions

Releases

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION ADMISSIONS AND RELEASES

FY 2014 – 2015

Community Supervision Releases by Type: FY 2014-2015


.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services 45

.

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th.Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

BCCX 4,823 5,676 3,743 6,280 20,522CBCX 40,551 37,261 31,418 19,234 128,464HCCF 0 0 0 0 0MCCX 17,481 17,011 15,396 16,336 66,224MLCC 1,870 1,587 1,254 1,793 6,504NECX 22,111 19,708 18,241 20,120 80,180NWCX 2,155 2,309 1,954 2,731 9,149SCCF 0 0 0 0 0TPFW 2,140 2,203 1,151 2,322 7,816TCIX 54,485 49,449 44,498 52,300 200,732WTSP 0 0 0 0 0FACILITIES 145,616 135,204 117,655 121,116 519,591TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $3,767,035Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.

1st. 2nd 3rd 4th. DISTRICTQuarter Quarter Quarter Quarter TOTAL

District 10 8,288 6,884 5,627 9,550 30,349District 20 2,510 2,313 1,866 2,755 9,444District 21 1,327 612 922 901 3,762District 30 2,047 745 1,546 1,004 5,342District 31 100 104 104 100 408District 40, 41, 42 2,771 1,622 2,312 2,756 9,461District 50 1,603 924 1,173 2,498 6,198District 51 343 425 441 664 1,873District 60 2,169 2,417 1,848 1,807 8,241District 61 1,044 1,352 600 759 3,755District 70, 71, 72 4,667 4,483 3,424 3,345 15,919District 80 2,106 1,277 2,188 2,259 7,830District 81 480 333 250 416 1,479SYSTEM 29,455 23,491 22,301 28,814 104,061

TOTAL SAVINGS: Dollar Value @ Minimum Wage $754,442Note: Mimimum wage = $7.25/hr.

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Inmate Community Service Work FY 2014 - 2015

Total Hours and Estimated Value of Community Service Work by

Community Supervision FY 2014-2015


Percentage of

Assignment Inmates PopulationAcademic Education 2,073 10.15%Vocational Programs 1,649 8.07%Support 5,705 27.93%Program Services 1,165 5.70%Recycling 130 0.64%TRICOR 1,058 5.18%Work Lines 287 1.41%Other Agencies 85 0.42%Community Service 429 2.10%Work Release 37 0.18%Cognitive Behavioral Programming 1,341 6.56%Behavioral Programming 1,157 5.66%Mental Health Programs 503 2.46%Tech. Violators Diversion Program 45 0.22%Release Center 18 0.09%Boot Camp/SAIU 50 0.24%Other 682 3.34%Total Assigned 16,414 80.35%Unassignable Status* 2,141 10.48%Job Waiting List 1,872 9.16%TOTAL INMATES 20,427 100.00%% of Eligible Inmates Assigned 89.5%

in segregation or initial classification, etc.

INMATE ASSIGMENTSJune 30, 2015

*Inmates who can not be assigned due to their status, which may include those

INMATE PROGRAM ASSIGNMENTS


.

1st 564 17 3.01% 2.45% 3.75%2nd 531 27 5.08% 1.94% 3.12%3rd 696 33 4.74% 3.28% 2.77%4th 989 58 5.86% 3.89% 4.47%Yearly 2780 135 4.86% 2.99% 3.53%

4.86%

FY 2015 FY 2014 %

Positive

FY 2013 %

Positive

SA Program

Average FY 2015

QuarterNumber Tested

# Positive/

% Positive/

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

% P

osi

tive

/Ref

use

d

Positive Drug Test Averages by Quarter

FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015

DRUG SCREENS: FY 2014 – 2015

Random drug screens are conducted monthly on 2.5% of the inmate population. These screens are necessary to identify the use of substances frequently used in prison. Substance abuse program participants are given an initial urine screen at the beginning of the program and are subject to facility random and reasonable suspicion testing throughout the program. All positive screens are confirmed through additional testing, and graduated sanctions are used for any positive drug screen.

Inmate Drug Screens


Full-Time Part-Time Full-time Part-Time

BCCX 747 0 0 104 0 866 0 1717DSNF 30 0 0 0 1 103 0 134HCCF 1863 0 0 0 1 788 0 2652MCCX 1415 0 0 119 30 858 0 2422MLCC 159 0 0 0 1 239 0 399NECX 633 0 0 5 1 756 0 1395NWCX 968 0 0 32 3 897 0 1900RMSI 195 18 0 59 24 158 0 454SCCF 952 0 0 0 20 629 0 1601TCIX 354 0 0 0 83 320 0 757

TPFW 287 0 0 23 91 293 0 694WCFA 835 0 0 0 2 545 0 1382WTSP 848 0 0 405 1 1126 0 2380

YEARLY TOTALS 9,286 18 0 747 258 7,578 0 17,887

VOCATIONAL ABE/HiSET

EDUCATIONAL ENROLLMENT: FY 2014-2015

VOLUNTEER LITERACYINSTITUTION

SEGREGATED Closed Circuit

TV COLLEGE TOTAL

VOCATIONALINSTITUTION NUMBER NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER

TESTED PASSED PASSED COMPLETIONSBCCX 118 62 53% 294DSNF 0 0 0% 70HCCF 58 46 79% 382MCCX 83 40 48% 324MLCC 11 6 55% 101

NECX 39 21 54% 353NWCX 83 34 41% 305RMSI 11 5 45% 73SCCF 18 14 78% 247TCIX 82 35 43% 117TPFW 28 4 14% 115WCFA 27 8 30% 220WTSP 42 15 36% 337YEARLYTOTALS 600 290 48% 2938

TEST RESULTS 2014 - 2015HiSET COMPLETIONS

FY 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015HiSET 598 464 685 786 737 710 700 640 618 460* 290

Vocational 1,765 1,473 1,365 1,342 1,468 1,585 2,282 3,676 3,672 2,927 2,938*G.E.D. HiSET

*Due to the transition from GED to HiSET, there were fewer exams administered in the last half of FY 2014.

High School Equivalency & Vocational Certificates: FY 2005-2015

INMATE EDUCATION: FY 2014 – 2015

Inmate GED & Vocational Certificates

.


.

CLINICAL SERVICES DIVISION The Office of Clinical Services operates under the leadership of the Director of Clinical Services. The Division of Clinical Services supports the mission of the TDOC by providing quality healthcare in the most efficient, cost effective, and ethical manner possible to its more than 20,000 inmates, while protecting the public health interest of the citizens of Tennessee. Upon intake into our prison system, all offenders receive extensive medical, mental health, dental and substance abuse screening and testing to identify their health status and treatment needs. Each of the Department’s facilities provides an on-site health clinic that offers a full range of healthcare services (e.g., daily sick call visits, chronic disease clinics, dental care, case management pharmacy, utilization management, inpatient services, out-patient services, infirmary services, tele-health, tele-psychiatry suicide crisis intervention, and emergency care). Health Services Health Services strives for the provision of essential medical and dental care and the elimination of costly expenditures attributed to unnecessary procedures through extensive inpatient utilization management efforts, statewide nursing skill assessment, and development and clinical case management. The goal of utilization management is to encourage the highest quality, in the most appropriate setting, from the most appropriate provider. Medically appropriate care is cost effective because it takes measure that both contains and avoids costs. Through the utilization management program the Agency seeks to avoid overuse of medical services by making clinical decisions based on available evidence based guidelines. The Nursing Skills Development Program ensures that all TDOC nurses are both competent and up to date in their ability to utilize each facility’s infirmary to its full potential, thus decreasing the number of inmates needing costly emergency room treatment and hospitalization for minor and chronic conditions. This also allows for shorter inpatient days when hospitalization is medically indicated and a quicker return to the inmate’s assigned facility, due to follow up care being performed on site (i.e. completion of IV antibiotics and limited chemotherapeutic agents). Additionally, Control measures have been established to track hospital admissions and transfers to the emergency room. One of the newer programs implemented was On-site Chemotherapy Infusion Program (OChIP) further reduces number of days a patient would have to remain in the hospital for their treatment. With the implementations of the OChIP program and the ongoing Nursing professional development, monitoring has revealed a 24% reduction in overall hospitalizations.

Site Hepatitis C Seizure Diabetes Hypertension Asthma COPD HIV Cancer TB Cardiac

BCCX 541 88 137 440 106 42 17 14 6 55

DSNF 81 25 94 246 32 40 9 49 0 61

HCCF 226 60 103 465 79 60 0 6 2 46

MCCX 383 55 96 387 106 48 23 7 2 53

MLCC 52 8 22 69 39 5 4 2 0 6

NECX 217 38 122 409 86 56 27 10 3 61

NWCX 422 40 155 523 119 41 52 4 1 33

RMSI 114 7 46 171 31 11 5 6 3 18

SCCF 259 42 92 443 70 34 0 0 0 52

TCIX‐M 141 3 44 192 42 4 17 0 4 10

TCIX‐A 68 2 16 54 14 3 3 0 1 3

TPFW 144 41 60 168 94 31 8 5 0 13

WCFA 213 24 72 296 112 60 0 3 0 30

WTSP 340 49 106 492 96 33 46 8 7 42

TOTAL 3201 482 1165 4355 1026 468 211 114 29 483


Due to extensive inpatient utilization management efforts the Department continues to achieve a significant decrease in hospital admissions. Hospital admissions have decreased approximately 216 encounters (see Figure 1) over the past 5 years. Telehealth has increased approximately 139% from 2012 to present (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

Behavioral Health Services Behavioral Health Services sets policy standards for the delivery of mental health, substance use, and sex offender treatment services, and evaluates the care provided throughout the TDOC system. The goals are to (1) reduce the debilitating effects of serious mental illness and maximize each inmate’s ability to participate in programs while maintaining a safe prison environment for inmates and staff, and (2) help prepare inmates with mental illness, substance use, and/or sex offender treatment needs to successfully transition from incarceration back to the community. Behavioral Health Services collaborates with mental health and substance use treatment vendors to provide specialty services (e.g., psychology, psychiatry, and substance use treatment). A continuum of services is provided including psychological assessment, case management, medication management, crisis intervention, individual/group therapy, substance use treatment services, and sex offender treatment.

Standardized the curriculum for Centers of Excellence Level III and Level IV Supportive Living Units (SLU) at Bledsoe County Correctional Complex, DeBerry Special Needs Facility, Morgan County Correctional Complex, South Central Correctional Facility, Tennessee Prison for Women, and West Tennessee State Prison, to comprehensively address offenders’ mental health and criminogenic needs.

Expanded the use of telehealth for the delivery of psychiatric services. Decreased the percentage of inmates on polypharmacy (four or more psychotropic medications) from 4.9%

to 4.0%. Implemented an evidence-based tool for identifying inmates’ substance use treatment needs. Expanded substance use treatment services to inmates in the SAIU (Boot Camp). Increased collaboration with the Tennessee Board of Parole to ensure offenders receive the appropriate

intensity of substance use treatment prior to release. Increased collaboration with the Tennessee Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services to

ensure inmates with severe mental illness receive appropriate mental health care upon reentry back to the community.

In collaboration with our mental health vendor, maintained a web-based reentry portal to identify community resources such as housing, transportation, medical care, etc., that are available throughout the state to assist offenders in overcoming barriers that commonly pose a challenge to successful transition back to the community .the use of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral interventions as an alternative to the exclusive reliance on psychotropic medication in addressing offenders’ mental health issues.

0

500

1000

FY'11

FY'12

FY'13

FY'14

FY'15

916811 746 749 700

Figure 1

Hospital Admissions


Behavioral Health Services has continued to utilize standardized protocols and guidelines for community transition of inmates with mental illness. The focus is treatment team effectiveness, case management, and transition/reentry of offenders with special mental health needs. Behavioral Health Services supports the use of behavioral and cognitive-behavioral interventions as an alternative to the exclusive reliance on psychotropic medication in addressing offenders’ mental health issues. The number of offenders with mental health needs continues to pose a challenge to TDOC. Currently, there are approximately 5,595 offenders who receive treatment for a diagnosed mental disorder. This number includes those in Levels of Care II, III, & IV; however, it excludes those offenders who are participating in treatment for a substance use disorder. General Discussion Approximately 18% of the offender population is receiving psychotropic medication for a mental illness. All inmates are assessed for their level of mental health functioning in accordance with a Levels of Care system. Data in Figure 3 indicates the number of offenders in the category (Level II) increased 8% over the past fiscal year. While this continues to reflect an increase in the number of offenders receiving mental health treatment since implementation of the Levels of Care system, the rate of growth is lower than the previous two years (15% and 29% respectively). We continue to believe the number of offenders identified as Level II reflects both a more accurate assessment of the true mental health needs of the offender population over time, as well as the enhanced mental health treatment resources that are now available to offenders with the continued implementation of the mental health contract.


Office of Quality Assurance The establishment of the Office of Quality Assurance formalizes a mechanism of monitoring Rehabilitative Services (inclusive of Offender Development, Clinical Services, and programs and treatment offered to offenders through community supervision) across the state in order to determine program efficacy, cost effectiveness, and staff accountability while continuously evaluating quality assurance. The Office of Quality Assurance incorporates a collaborative, evidence-based approach to measuring correctional intervention effectiveness through a continuous assessment process. This approach focuses on ongoing improvements from established benchmarks and measures, while ensuring programs are producing meaningful outcomes, such as customer service and preparing inmates for reentry, with the goal of reducing recidivism.

Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation is a unit within Rehabilitative Services that is tasked with reducing recidivism through the following evidence-based programs and services:

Risk/Needs Assessment

Reentry Services

Education

Inmate Jobs

Volunteer and Social Services

Cognitive-Behavioral Programming

Offender Workforce Development

Counseling Services

Housing

Victim Services

The Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation has developed best practices for the offender assessment, classification, case management and reentry services process that ensures offender reentry plans and program case plans are developed for each offender that will follow them throughout their incarceration to ensure their program, education, and reentry needs are met. Additionally, the Office of Offender Development and Rehabilitation has expanded its cognitive behavioral programming to community supervision to ensure offender’s programmatic needs are met with minimal delay. Other initiatives from the Office of Offender Development will be to ensure education and program slots are filled to capacity, expand post-secondary educational opportunities, reduce the number of offenders that remain in a TDOC facility after parole is granted, improve reentry services through the issuance of state identifications, housing, and employment, increase the number of active volunteers, and to expand community partnerships as part of the Take ONE program.


Demographics

2015


FY 2015


FY 2015



Decision Sport

Demographics 55


County Facility Security Designation

Johnson Northeast Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumMorgan Morgan County Correctional Complex Minimum - MaximumBledsoe Bledsoe County Correctional Complex Minimum - CloseDavidson DeBerry Special Needs Facility Minimum - Maximum

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution Minimum - MaximumTennessee Prison for Women Minimum - Maximum

Hickman Turney Center Industrial Complex Minimum - CloseWayne South Central Correctional Facility Minimum - CloseHardeman Hardeman County Correctional Facility Minimum - Medium

Whiteville Correctional Facility Minimum - MediumShelby Mark Luttrell Correctional Center Minimum - MediumLauderdale West Tennessee State Penitentiary Minimum - MaximumLake Northwest Correctional Complex Minimum - Close

Prison Custody Level

Number of Inmates

Percent of Total

Maximum 469 2.3%Close 724 3.5%Medium 15,876 77.7%Minimum 3,039 14.9%Unclassified 319 1.6%TOTAL 20,427 100.0%

June 30, 2015

InstitutionAverage Daily

PopulationBledsoe County Correctional Complex 2,436

Charles Bass Correctional Complex 524

DeBerry Special Needs Facility 631

Hardeman County Correctional Facility 1,989

Mark Luttrell Correctional Center 433

Morgan County Correctional Complex 2,192

Northeast Correctional Complex 1,791

Northwest Correctional Complex 2,429

Riverbend Maximum Security Institution 638

South Central Correctional Facility 1,665

Tennessee Prison for Women 768

Turney Center Industrial Complex 1,586

Whiteville Correctional Facility 1,520West Tennessee State Penitentiary 2,388

System Total 20,990Source: TDOC Bed Space and Operating Capacities Report

*Charles Bass Correctional Complex stopped housing inmates in April 2015.

Average Daily Population: FY 2014 - 2015

Prison Security Designations: June 30, 2015

Inmate Population Custody Levels: June 30, 2015

Demographics 57

65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

BCCX 36 68 120 190 265 325 398 381 352 326 13 0 37.7

DSNF 76 40 64 56 76 78 87 75 63 17 0 0 46.0

HCCF 40 46 86 177 187 246 293 339 344 230 5 0 37.7

MCCX 43 52 94 155 183 215 270 344 430 255 11 0 36.9

MLCC 4 12 11 21 48 57 79 85 82 31 1 0 37.0

NECX 63 70 105 200 208 246 290 264 229 131 4 0 40.7

NWCX 64 69 129 190 238 279 418 414 367 225 26 12 38.3

RMSI 15 29 45 68 80 89 115 124 136 65 0 0 38.9

SCCF 29 41 98 158 183 217 264 279 264 141 4 0 38.7

TCIX 27 34 73 124 130 196 270 309 286 160 6 0 37.3

TPFW 8 15 36 49 74 112 121 130 155 56 2 0 37.5

WCFA 42 37 70 111 127 201 260 280 260 135 6 0 38.0

WTSP 42 63 129 186 211 319 319 385 379 220 5 0 38.3

SYSTEM 489 576 1,060 1,685 2,010 2,580 3,184 3,409 3,347 1,992 83 12 38.4

AGE

Asian Black HispanicNative

American White Male Female

BCCX 4 806 51 3 1610 2176 298DSNF 2 272 11 2 345 632 -HCCF 6 1011 31 5 940 1993 -MCCX 5 973 41 1 1032 2052 -MLCC 2 152 7 4 266 - 431NECX 2 648 47 2 1111 1810 -NWCX 3 1217 68 4 1139 2431 -RMSI 3 402 13 2 346 766 -SCCF 7 798 60 3 810 1678 -TCIX 4 810 48 2 751 1615 -TPFW 3 180 13 2 560 - 758WCFA 3 743 27 2 754 1529 -WTSP 5 1263 36 0 954 2258 -

SYSTEM 49 9275 453 32 10618 18940 1487

RACE SEX

Demographics by Facility June 30, 2015


BCCX DSNF HCCF MCCX MLCC NECX NWCX RMSI SCCF TCIX TPFW WCFA WTSPFacility Population 2,474 632 1,993 2,052 431 1,810 2,431 766 1,678 1,615 758 1,529 2,258

OFFENSEPERSON OFFENSES 39% 63% 44% 42% 45% 57% 45% 56% 57% 44% 38% 43% 51%

Homicide 14% 28% 13% 20% 26% 25% 15% 36% 22% 21% 20% 11% 23%

Kidnapping 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2%

Sex Offenses 12% 22% 17% 8% 3% 18% 15% 7% 22% 11% 3% 17% 12%

Assault 12% 12% 13% 13% 16% 12% 13% 12% 12% 11% 14% 13% 14%

PROPERTY OFFENSES 32% 17% 32% 33% 24% 24% 28% 27% 23% 27% 28% 30% 31%

Arson 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1%

Burglary 11% 5% 10% 9% 4% 7% 9% 6% 7% 8% 7% 9% 8%

Forgery/Fraud 3% 1% 1% 1% 5% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 5% 1% 1%

Larceny/Theft 6% 2% 4% 4% 6% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 7% 4% 3%

Robbery 12% 9% 17% 19% 9% 12% 14% 17% 13% 15% 8% 15% 18%

SOCIETAL OFFENSES 21% 17% 18% 19% 20% 14% 20% 14% 16% 23% 24% 20% 15%

Drugs/Narcotics 19% 16% 17% 18% 19% 13% 19% 13% 15% 22% 23% 19% 14% Vehicular Homicide/DUI 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

ALL OTHER OFFENSES 7% 4% 6% 6% 10% 6% 6% 3% 4% 6% 11% 7% 3%

C/S/F Person* 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 4% 1% 0%

C/S/F Property* 1% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0%

C/S/F Societal* 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%

Escape 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

All Other** 4% 2% 5% 4% 5% 4% 4% 2% 2% 3% 5% 5% 2%TOTAL 99% 101% 100% 100% 99% 101% 99% 100% 100% 100% 101% 100% 100%

**Includes 19 unprocessed judgment orders.*C/S/F = Refers to non-substantive offenses such as conspiracy, solicitation, facilitation, aiding and abetting, etc.

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Total

Rape 0 0 0 0 0Weapon Offenses 460 431 453 425 1769Drug Offenses 369 356 332 344 1401STG Offenses 171 189 188 172 720Riot 0 0 0 0 0Sexual Misconduct 318 393 337 377 1425

AssaultAssault on Offender 87 111 88 105 391Assault on Staff 124 70 69 87 350

DeathHomicide 2 0 1 0 3Suicide 1 0 1 1 3Accidental Death 0 0 0 0 0Natural Death 18 19 14 20 71Lethal Injection 0 0 0 0 0

EscapeSecure Supervision 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security - Work Crew - Supervised 0 0 0 0 0Minimum Security - Work Crew - Unsupervised 0 1 0 0 1Furlough/Pass 0 0 0 0 0

Non-Violent Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 20.50 18.71 18.87 19.48 77.57Violent Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 1.30 1.13 1.10 1.30 4.84Total Incident Rate (per 100 inmates) 21.80 19.84 19.97 20.78 82.40Data source: Incident Report June 30, 2015

Facility Populations by Primary Offense: June 30, 2015

Incidents: FY 2014 – 2015

Demographics 59

*Den

otes

vio

lent

inci

dent

s

Ple

ase

note

that

inci

dent

s re

port

ed m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts

are

by d

efin

ition

abo

ut a

sin

gle

part

icip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or

suic

ide)

S

OU

RC

E: T

his

repo

rt s

umm

ariz

es d

ata

ente

red

by F

acil

ity

Ope

ratio

ns’

pers

onne

l in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith T

DO

C p

olic

y 10

3.02

.

BC

CX

CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DT

CIX

TP

FW

WC

FA

WT

SPSY

STE

M

Ble

dsoe

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entr

al

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Tur

ney

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN

Pris

on fo

r W

omen

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

Sta

te

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2367

449

1965

2164

424

1774

2375

629

1642

717

1566

777

1500

2367

2071

5

Inc

Type

In

cide

nt D

escr

iptio

nA

rres

tA

FOFE

LO

NY

-OFN

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

rres

tA

FSFE

LO

NY

-ST

AFF

00

60

11

12

50

32

45

30A

rres

tA

FVFE

LO

NY

-VIS

ITO

R3

04

130

71

00

01

10

737

Ars

on*

AR

ISE

R-I

NJ-

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PER

DIS

RU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ars

on*

AR

DIN

JUR

Y-P

RO

P D

MG

/$50

0-O

PR D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

rson

*A

RP

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

00

00

00

00

01

00

00

01

Ass

ault

*A

SAST

AFF

-SE

RIO

US

INJU

RY

00

50

01

21

40

00

12

16A

ssau

lt*

ASB

STA

FF-I

NJU

RY

21

11

01

31

21

20

16

22A

ssau

lt*

ASC

STA

FF-M

INO

R IN

JUR

Y43

017

90

1513

618

56

86

4519

1A

ssau

lt*

ASJ

STA

FF-N

O IN

JUR

Y11

019

120

04

726

93

19

2012

1A

ssau

lt*

ASD

OFN

-SE

RIO

US

INJU

RY

20

35

03

30

41

10

213

37A

ssau

lt*

ASE

OFN

-IN

JUR

Y2

09

31

120

07

32

07

1166

Ass

ault

*A

SFO

FN-M

INO

R IN

JUR

Y23

37

181

1019

611

615

716

4819

0A

ssau

lt*

ASK

OFN

-NO

INJU

RY

211

93

13

54

213

124

1010

98A

ssau

lt*

ASG

VIS

-SE

RIO

US

INJU

RY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0A

ssau

lt*

ASH

VIS

-IN

JUR

Y0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Ass

ault

*A

SIV

IS-M

INO

R IN

JUR

Y0

00

00

10

00

00

00

01

Ass

ault

*A

SMV

IS-N

O IN

JUR

Y0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

EA

OFN

-NA

TU

RA

L0

05

41

41

41

421

22

471

Dea

thD

EC

DE

AT

H-O

FN-E

XE

C-E

LEC

CH

R0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

th*

DE

HO

FN-H

OM

ICID

E0

00

10

11

00

00

00

03

Dea

thD

EI

OFN

-EX

EC

-LE

TH

INJ

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

ES

OFN

-SU

ICID

E0

00

10

00

01

00

00

13

Dea

thD

OA

OFN

-AC

CID

EN

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

th*

DE

GST

AFF

-HO

MIC

IDE

(ON

DU

TY

)0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

th*

DE

FST

AFF

-SU

ICID

E (O

N D

UTY

)0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

ED

STA

FF-A

CC

IDE

NT

(ON

DU

TY)

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DE

TST

AFF

(ON

DU

TY)-

NA

TUR

AL

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DE

VV

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

*D

VH

VIS

ITO

R-H

OM

ICID

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

th*

DV

SV

ISIT

OR

-SU

ICID

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dea

thD

VA

VIS

ITO

R-A

CC

IDE

NT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0D

eath

DV

NV

ISIT

OR

-NA

TU

RA

L0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Dis

turb

ance

DIL

TEM

P. C

ON

TR

OL

LOSS

00

00

00

00

00

00

01

1D

istu

rban

ceD

IRTH

RE

AT

CO

NT

RO

L L

OSS

10

00

00

00

00

00

00

1D

istu

rban

ceD

ISM

INO

R51

427

318

397

1416

523

817

733

645

831

182

305

2757

TD

OC

IN

CID

EN

T S

UM

MA

RY

: F

Y 2

014

– 20

15


*Den

otes

vio

lent

inci

dent

s

Ple

ase

note

that

inci

dent

s re

port

ed m

ay in

clud

e m

ore

than

one

par

ticip

ant w

hile

oth

er in

cide

nts

are

by d

efin

ition

abo

ut a

sin

gle

part

icip

ant (

ex: d

eath

or

suic

ide)

. S

OU

RC

E: T

his

repo

rt s

umm

ariz

es d

ata

ente

red

by F

acil

ity

Ope

ratio

ns’

pers

onne

l in

acco

rdan

ce w

ith T

DO

C p

olic

y 10

3.02

.

BC

CX

CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SISC

CF

SPN

DT

CIX

TP

FW

WC

FA

WT

SPSY

STE

M

Ble

dsoe

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. Lu

ttrel

l C

ente

r

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

Se

curit

y In

stitu

tion

Sout

h C

entra

l C

orre

ctio

nal

Faci

lity

DeB

erry

Sp

ecia

l N

eeds

Fa

cilit

y

Turn

ey

Cen

ter

Indu

stria

l C

ompl

ex

TN P

rison

for

Wom

en

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l Fa

cilit

y

Wes

t TN

Sta

te

Peni

tent

iary

Ave

rage

Pop

ulat

ion

2367

449

1965

2164

424

1774

2375

629

1642

717

1566

777

1500

2367

2071

5

Inc

Type

In

cide

nt D

escr

iptio

nD

rugs

DR

JC

ON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-O

FN6

320

151

341

32

25

17

1712

6D

rugs

DR

KC

ON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-S

TAFF

00

00

00

00

00

00

10

1D

rugs

DR

LC

ON

FIS-

SIG

NIF

AM

T-V

ISIT

OR

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1D

rugs

DR

QC

ON

FISC

ATI

ON

-OFF

EN

DE

R13

915

109

135

967

119

4821

2165

1645

8889

7D

rugs

DR

NC

ON

FISC

ATI

ON

-ST

AFF

00

00

00

00

00

00

01

1D

rugs

DR

OC

ON

FISC

ATI

ON

-VIS

ITO

R1

01

00

00

00

00

00

02

Dru

gsD

RP

POSS

ESS

ION

108

310

540

6350

112

225

05

3036

3D

rugs

DR

SSE

LLI

NG

00

10

00

00

01

41

30

10E

quip

Pro

bE

PAM

AJO

R D

ISR

UPT

ION

31

00

00

01

00

00

00

5E

scap

e*

ESA

SEC

UR

E S

UPE

RV

ISIO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esc

ape

*E

SBM

IN S

EC

UR

ITY

-VIO

LEN

CE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

eE

SCM

IN S

EC

UR

ITY

UN

IT0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Esc

ape

ESP

MIN

SE

C W

OR

K C

RE

W-S

UPV

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

eE

SUM

IN S

EC

WO

RK

CR

EW

UN

SUPV

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1E

scap

eE

SEFU

RLO

UG

H/P

ASS

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

eE

SFA

TT. S

EC

UR

E S

UPV

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

e*

ESH

ATT

.MIN

SE

CU

RIT

Y-V

IOL

EN

CE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

eE

SIA

TT. M

IN S

EC

UR

ITY

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0E

scap

eE

SRR

ETU

RN

FR

OM

ESC

APE

PR

IOR

TO

TO

MIS

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

ISE

R-I

NJ-

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PR D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0Fi

reFI

PIN

J-PR

OP

DM

G>$

500-

OPR

DIS

RU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Fire

FIS

PRO

P D

MG

>$50

0-O

PER

DIS

RU

P0

00

00

01

00

10

00

13

Inju

ryIH

AA

CC

IDE

NT

-OFN

-SE

RIO

US

01

00

00

00

00

21

04

8In

jury

IHC

AC

CID

EN

T-O

FN35

480

502

11

93

366

10

322

2In

jury

IHB

AC

CID

EN

T-O

FN W

RK

RE

LA

TE

D0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Inju

ryIJ

AA

CC

IDE

NT

-ST

AFF

-SE

RIO

US

22

00

21

00

00

10

01

9In

jury

IJB

AC

CID

EN

T-S

TA

FF50

1410

4112

6113

4919

512

212

1631

6In

jury

ILA

AC

CID

EN

T-V

ISIT

OR

-SE

RIO

US

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0In

jury

ILB

AC

CID

EN

T-V

ISIT

OR

71

13

31

13

02

11

06

30In

jury

*IN

BSE

LF

INFL

ICT

ED

-SE

RIO

US

01

30

01

00

13

00

00

9In

jury

*IN

CSE

LF

INFL

ICT

ED

391

1113

83

105

2424

68

3425

211

Illne

ssIO

TO

FN-S

ER

IOU

S-H

OSP

459

157

1321

307

141

330

2273

326

Illne

ssIS

HST

AFF

-SE

RIO

US-

HO

SP(O

N D

UT

Y)

93

73

30

121

01

58

211

65Ill

ness

IVS

VIS

ITO

R-S

ER

IOU

S-H

OSP

00

00

00

00

00

10

00

1Ill

ness

IVM

VIS

ITO

R0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Oth

erB

THB

OM

B T

HR

EA

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Oth

erC

ON

CO

NT

RA

BA

ND

498

3640

219

814

172

322

232

187

146

232

4618

626

929

40O

ther

PCT

POSS

/USE

CE

LLU

LA

R T

EL

.12

923

193

262

015

042

147

405

127

138

261

1697

TD

OC

IN

CID

EN

T S

UM

MA

RY

: F

Y 2

014

- 20

15

Demographics 61

*Den

otes

vio

lent

inci

dent

s P

leas

e no

te th

at in

cide

nts

repo

rted

may

incl

ude

mor

e th

an o

ne p

artic

ipan

t whi

le o

ther

inci

dent

s ar

e by

def

initi

on a

bout

a s

ingl

e pa

rtic

ipan

t (ex

: dea

th o

r su

icid

e).

Inc

iden

t rat

es (

per

100

inm

ates

) ar

e ca

lcul

ated

on

the

basi

s of

the

aver

age

inm

ate

popu

latio

n by

fac

ility

and

sys

tem

wid

e.

SO

UR

CE

: Thi

s re

port

sum

mar

izes

dat

a en

tere

d by

Fac

ilit

y O

pera

tions

’ pe

rson

nel i

n ac

cord

ance

with

TD

OC

pol

icy

103.

02.

BC

CX

CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SI

SC

CF

SP

ND

TC

IXT

PF

WW

CF

AW

TS

PS

YS

TE

M

Ble

dsoe

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Cha

rles

Bas

s C

orre

ctio

nal

Com

plex

Har

dem

an

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l F

acili

ty

Mor

gan

Cou

nty

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Mar

k H

. L

uttr

ell

Cen

ter

Nor

thea

st

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Nor

thw

est

Cor

rect

iona

l C

ompl

ex

Riv

erbe

nd

Max

imum

S

ecur

ity

Inst

itut

ion

Sou

th C

entr

al

Cor

rect

iona

l F

acili

ty

DeB

erry

S

peci

al

Nee

ds

Fac

ility

Tur

ney

Cen

ter

Indu

stri

al

Com

plex

TN

Pri

son

for

Wom

en

Whi

tevi

lle

Cor

rect

iona

l F

acili

ty

Wes

t T

N S

tate

P

enit

enti

ary

Ave

rage

Pop

ula

tion

2367

449

1965

2164

424

1774

2375

629

1642

717

1566

777

1500

2367

2071

5

Inc

Typ

e

Inci

dent

Des

crip

tion

Oth

erP

CT

PO

SS

/US

E C

EL

LU

LA

R T

EL

.12

923

193

262

015

042

147

405

127

138

261

1697

Oth

erP

TO

PO

SS

/US

E T

OB

AC

CO

PR

OD

.27

856

127

946

6816

240

2033

123

4029

9411

70O

ther

PD

AP

RO

P D

MG

>$5

009

120

92

24

00

46

70

560

Oth

erS

XM

SE

XU

AL

MIS

CO

ND

UC

T16

02

1714

918

106

8710

225

828

4611

1043

114

25O

ther

*R

AP

RA

PE

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

*R

IOR

IOT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

SB

TS

AB

OT

AG

E -

OP

R D

ISR

UP

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

*H

OS

HO

ST

AG

E S

ITU

AT

ION

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

EH

TE

PID

EM

IC P

UB

LIC

HE

AL

TH

TH

RE

AT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0O

ther

PG

AP

AR

T I

N S

TG

AC

TIV

ITY

390

5826

016

357

201

380

3431

305

Oth

erP

GM

PO

SS

ES

S S

TG

MA

TE

RIA

L92

251

700

1028

2021

1958

035

941

5O

ther

ILP

INS

T L

OC

KD

OW

N-P

AR

TIA

L0

523

30

23

629

06

39

594

Oth

erIL

TIN

ST

LO

CK

DO

WN

-TO

TA

L0

08

11

25

106

02

19

348

Str

ike

SK

IIN

MA

TE

-OP

ER

.DIS

RU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Str

ike

SK

SS

TA

FF

-OP

ER

DIS

RU

P0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Sui

cide

*S

UA

AT

T-S

ER

IOU

S I

NJU

RY

10

00

00

00

02

00

00

3S

uici

de*

SU

CA

TT

EM

PT

62

05

01

41

12

04

04

30U

se o

f F

orce

UF

CC

HE

MIC

AL

AG

EN

TS

170

675

08

1422

6113

54

3412

637

6U

se o

f F

orce

UF

DD

EA

DL

Y W

EA

PO

N0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Use

of

For

ceU

FE

EL

EC

RE

ST

RA

INT

S15

02

160

07

90

32

20

1470

Use

of

For

ceU

FL

LE

SS

TH

AN

LE

TH

AL

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0U

se o

f F

orce

UF

MM

ED

ICA

L5

00

190

00

10

200

20

148

Use

of

For

ceU

FP

PH

YS

ICA

L43

354

410

1321

3843

1715

1918

4236

7W

eapo

nW

AB

AM

MU

NIT

ION

00

00

00

00

00

01

00

1W

eapo

nW

AM

AM

MU

NIT

ION

-SIG

NIF

AM

T0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WC

FC

OM

ME

RC

IAL

FIR

EA

RM

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

CK

CO

MM

ER

CIA

L K

NIF

E1

00

21

00

00

00

00

15

Wea

pon

WE

BE

XP

LO

SIV

E0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Wea

pon

WE

XE

XP

LO

SIV

E-S

IGN

IF A

MT

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HF

HO

ME

MA

DE

FIR

EA

RM

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

0W

eapo

nW

HK

HO

ME

MA

DE

KN

IFE

813

153

101

056

338

4626

01

960

5632

615

17W

eapo

nW

OT

OT

HE

R5

02

161

28

41

211

10

962

Wea

pon

WP

CC

LU

B0

00

30

00

00

00

00

58

Wea

pon

WR

MR

AW

MA

TE

RIA

LS

400

228

09

307

01

70

047

171

Wea

pon

WT

AC

LA

SS

A T

OO

L0

00

10

00

00

12

10

05

Wea

pon

WT

BC

LA

SS

B T

OO

L0

00

00

00

00

00

00

00

Su

mm

ary

BC

CX

CB

CX

HC

CF

MC

CX

ML

RC

NE

CX

NW

CX

RM

SI

SC

CF

SP

ND

TC

IXT

PF

WW

CF

AW

TS

PT

otal

TO

TA

L-V

IOL

EN

T15

09

8471

1141

8431

102

6947

3286

185

1,00

2*T

OT

AL

- N

ON

-VIO

LE

NT

2,33

526

91,

652

1,81

610

41,

011

1,99

489

61,

359

420

979

238

743

2,25

216

,068

TO

TA

L2,

485

278

1,73

61,

887

115

1,05

22,

078

927

1,46

148

91,

026

270

829

2,43

717

,070

Rat

e p

er 1

00 -

Vio

len

t6.

342.

014.

273.

282.

592.

313.

544.

936.

219.

623.

004.

125.

737.

814.

84R

ate

per

100

- N

on-V

iole

nt

98.6

559

.96

84.0

783

.93

24.5

257

.00

83.9

714

2.47

82.7

958

.58

62.5

030

.62

49.5

495

.12

77.5

7R

ate

per

100

- T

otal

104.

9961

.96

88.3

487

.22

27.1

259

.31

87.5

014

7.40

89.0

068

.21

65.5

034

.73

55.2

710

2.94

82.4

0

TD

OC

IN

CID

EN

T S

UM

MA

RY

: F

Y 2

014

– 20

15


District Asian Black HispanicNative


10 3 139 31 1 1102 1051 22520 1 235 18 1 671 762 16421 0 36 1 1 536 496 7830 0 287 6 1 792 934 15231 1 38 10 1 421 380 9140 2 51 9 1 61 115 941 6 271 31 0 254 526 3642 10 1089 129 1 571 1555 24550 9 256 32 3 620 776 14451 0 174 10 2 348 460 7460 2 377 5 0 254 557 8161 1 312 6 0 518 731 10670 3 336 68 0 65 464 871 2 508 6 1 127 573 7172 4 1125 18 0 132 1162 11780 0 133 4 2 271 370 4081 2 190 16 0 403 520 91

OIC 2 96 22 1 151 231 41Unassigned 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SYSTEM 48 5653 422 16 7297 11663 1773

RACE SEX

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 51 56 82 145 157 173 200 218 153 41 0 0 41.8

20 29 36 69 88 98 128 152 169 122 35 0 0 40.9

21 27 21 40 61 56 66 109 105 58 31 0 0 41.3

30 60 53 90 142 128 163 187 149 89 25 0 0 43.8

31 22 23 36 46 49 78 80 51 70 16 0 0 42.3

40 2 4 10 10 12 21 22 24 17 2 0 0 40.6

41 48 52 61 82 77 65 75 66 31 5 0 0 47.3

42 42 69 104 173 181 254 306 360 241 69 0 1 40.1

50 32 27 54 94 92 136 167 171 104 43 0 0 40.6

51 22 26 49 42 58 63 86 107 67 13 1 0 41.7

60 20 30 32 73 75 88 114 110 66 29 1 0 41.1

61 28 31 46 85 103 125 146 147 107 18 1 0 41.1

70 7 15 25 47 74 82 79 79 53 11 0 0 41.1

71 15 26 35 64 63 68 116 105 103 49 0 0 39.2

72 39 58 79 119 115 180 228 203 170 88 0 0 40.2

80 22 12 33 41 45 54 62 67 60 14 0 0 41.6

81 29 14 36 48 70 73 99 120 90 32 0 0 40.0

OIC 17 8 22 35 45 38 40 40 25 2 0 0 44.2

Unassigned

SYSTEM 512 561 903 1395 1498 1855 2268 2291 1626 523 3 1 N/A

AGE

Demographics of Parolees by District

June 30, 2015

Demographics 63

District Asian Black HispanicNative


10 11 420 89 9 5177 3812 189420 17 761 47 17 3069 2852 105921 6 196 21 3 3114 2381 95930 11 1470 72 3 4745 4618 168331 4 97 39 3 2080 1485 73840 31 1854 136 2 1261 2426 85841 11 1061 66 0 688 1477 34942 25 1194 74 1 661 1489 46650 50 781 132 4 2669 2693 94351 13 505 62 3 2156 1901 83860 3 1156 23 3 1094 1775 50461 3 717 19 5 1656 1729 67170 5 376 25 1 209 476 14071 6 1624 22 0 485 1576 56172 19 3749 55 3 555 3284 109780 25 669 66 2 1806 1937 63181 10 446 54 1 1791 1623 679

OIC 35 1970 565 21 3949 5188 1352Unassigned 0 0 0 0 1 1 0

SYSTEM 285 19046 1567 81 37166 42723 15422

RACE SEX

District 65+ 60-64 55-59 50-54 45-49 40-44 35-39 30-34 25-29 20-24 18-19 <18 Avg Age

10 121 139 286 454 565 754 859 937 972 590 29 0 38.0

20 85 78 197 256 335 428 561 746 693 496 36 0 36.8

21 52 55 131 208 326 362 539 567 664 409 26 1 36.4

30 91 111 291 455 537 744 955 1028 1182 856 51 0 36.4

31 67 57 117 187 201 267 308 369 388 255 7 0 38.1

40 29 66 134 192 268 355 483 594 624 506 33 0 35.5

41 40 55 103 161 165 199 218 307 336 226 16 0 37.6

42 18 36 77 143 140 212 281 345 410 276 17 0 35.6

50 62 78 145 254 313 381 501 622 624 608 46 2 36.0

51 75 70 129 193 227 332 367 429 476 418 23 0 37.0

60 36 45 85 156 177 250 346 410 408 343 23 0 35.9

61 39 50 107 162 209 280 396 419 349 357 31 1 36.5

70 12 8 21 41 59 79 97 108 107 82 2 0 36.6

71 15 32 68 115 136 188 270 331 440 496 46 0 33.4

72 42 72 175 237 265 420 576 738 889 885 81 1 34.1

80 22 39 90 163 200 257 347 492 519 416 23 0 35.0

81 42 53 87 170 186 246 310 377 447 368 15 1 36.1

OIC 160 253 535 786 925 969 1061 977 693 180 1 0 42.1

Unassigned 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56.0

SYSTEM 1008 1297 2779 4333 5234 6723 8475 9796 10221 7767 506 6 N/A

AGE

Demographics of Probationers

by District June 30, 2015


Supervision Level Supervision Type

Minimum Monthly

Required Interactions

ENHANCED 1 Face to Face in Field

SANCTIONED3 Face to Face in Office

or Field

2 Collateral Contacts

Total: 6 Contacts

INTAKE 1 Face to Face in Field

POST VIOLATION 2 Face to Face in Office

or Field

DRC PHASE 2 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE ONE Total: 4 Contacts

MAXIMUM 1 Face to Face in Field

RESISTIVE1 Face to Face in Office

or Field

DRC PHASE 3 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE TWO Total: 3 Contacts

MEDIUM 1 Face to Face in the

Field or Office

MINIMUM or

TELEPHONE REPORTING 1 Collateral Contact

PSU PHASE THREE Total: 1 Contact

Administrative

Absconder, Deported, Detainer, In Custody on TDOC sentence,

Inter‐State Compact outgoing, Judicial Suspension of Supervision,

Residential Treatment Placement, Suspension of Direct

Supervision, Warrant

Status (Interactions as

Needed)

Standard

Special Restricted

Restricted

Elevated

DRC PHASE 1

Parole Probation

Special Restricted 14 853

Restricted 1071 4202

Elevated 1566 2170

Standard 7342 29438

Administrative 3442 21652

Unassigned 23 85

Totals 13458 58400

Data Source: Community Supervision Division

Level of Supervision

Community Supervision Offender Levels of Supervision

July 1, 2015

2015


FY 2015


FY 2015



Decision Sport

User’s Guide 67

STATISTICAL ABSTRACT USER’S GUIDE

Population, Capacity, & Trends

TDOC Backup: Felons sentenced to TDOC custody and held in local jails while awaiting transfer to a TDOC institution. Local or Locally Sentenced: Convicted felons sentenced to serve their time in a local jail. As felony offenders, these persons are under TDOC jurisdiction. Other Convicted Felons: Convicted felons awaiting sentencing or not yet ready for transfer to TDOC because of other pending charges. Includes technical violators awaiting probable cause/revocation/rescission hearing or adjudication of pending charges. Convicted Misdemeanants: Inmates serving time because of a misdemeanor conviction. Pre-Trial Felony Detainees: Inmates charged with a felony but not yet convicted. Pre-Trial Misdemeanant Detainees: Inmates charged with a misdemeanor but not yet convicted. Others: Inmates held in local facilities for federal crimes, city ordinances, etc. Community Corrections: A grant program created in 1985 as an alternative to incarceration. Programs are developed based on the individual needs of the area served. Probation: Felons subject to conditions imposed by the court and subject to community supervision without incarceration. Parole: Felons originally sentenced to an incarceration period and released to serve the remainder of their sentence under community supervision.

Offender Accountability, Programs & Services

Level of Care: An inmate’s need for mental health services based on their ability to function in general population. Level I: No mental health services are indicated for the inmate. Adjustment and function in the general population is not impaired by mental illness.

68 User’s Guide

Level II: Mental health outpatient services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is mildly impaired due to mental illness and/or mental retardation or is not currently impaired but he/she needs monitoring. Level III: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is moderately impaired due to a serious mental illness. This designation reflects a tenuous mental status that is easily overwhelmed by everyday pressures, demands, and frustrations. Level IV: Supported living unit services are indicated when an inmate’s ability to function in general population is severely impaired due to serious and persistent mental illness. This level reflects active symptoms of a major mental illness and impaired reality testing.

Demographics

Class A Incidents: Events which involve life threatening matters and breaches of security that are likely to cause serious operational problems, imminent threat to the control and order of a facility and/or to the community Selected other incidents: Less serious events where injury to staff, visitors and/or inmates may or may not have occurred that cause the disruption of the normal facility operation, or which pose a possible risk to the health or safety of the general public that did not require the involvement of outside agencies in institutional functions, as well as events that pose no threat to the local community, or to the safe and secure operation of the institution. Please note that most incidents reported in the monthly summary may include more than one participant or infraction while other incidents are by definition about a single participant (ex: death or suicide).

www.tn.gov/correction

RACHEL JACKSON BUILDING 320 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH

NASHVILLE, TN 37243 615-253-8187

statistical abstract fiscal year 2015 - tn.gov · statistical abstract fiscal year 2015 prepared:...

Documents