statement showing the list of pio., r.t.i. act. from 01 … act.pdf · 3 of the car in oct., 2011...

1

STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF PIO., R.T.I. ACT. FROM 01-01-2013 TO 31-12-2013

Sl.

No

FILE NO. & DATE &

HO MEMO NO.

NAME OF THE APPLICANT &

ADDRESSED

QUESTION ANSWAR DEATE OF REPLY

SENT TO

APPLICANT

1 Tr.T8/167/2013,

Dt.08-01-2013.

L&O/A6/RTI.Act/107/13

31-01-2013

Sri Rahul R. Buddala,

C/o Y.P. Rama Krishna,

B-14, Infosys Gachibowli,

HYDERABAD – 5000 32.

Please do provide me a list of all the

defaulters, whose combined Challan is

more than Rs.1000/- up to 31st

December, 2012.

It is submitted that upto 31st December, 2012 a sum

of Rs.65,722 defaulters are identified whose

combined e-challan(s) and fine amount is more than

Rs.1000/- above. It is very difficult to bulk print out of

the quantity of 1134 pages of above content.

01-02-2013

Please do provide me a list of all the

Government departments, which are

yet to pay their challans to Hyderabad

Traffic Police Department, with the

number of cases registered against

them and the total amount due for

each department, up to 31 December,

2012.

Traffic Rules & Violations should be booked against

all kinds of vehicles move on the road and it is to

submit that as on 31st December, 2012, 17381 e-

Challans are pending against the Government

Departments, which are yet to pay their e-Challans

to the Hyderabad Traffic Police Department, with the

No. of cases 23183 Registered against the them and

the total amount of Rs.32,55,985 is due upto 31st

December, 2012.

Note:- Please make yourself convenient to Visit Traffic

Complex for having clarity of your Questions so that

the HTP may supply required documents duly seeking

on any working day and consult the undersigned

appointment.

2

2 Tr.T8/496/2013,

Dt.28-01-2013.

Sri T. Sanjeeva Reddy,

R/o H.No.2-2-1105/9/B,

Flat No.302, Balaji’s

Thirunilayam,

Tilaknagar,

HYDERABAD – 500 044.

What are the guidelines issued by

Supreme Court on sun control film on

cars ? Is the use of black film banned or

any sun control film is banned or are

there any acceptable visual light

transmission limits ?

The use of black films are banned by the Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India. A copy of judgment in

I.A.Nos, 4, 5, I.A. Nos 6-8, I.A. Nos. 9-11, 12, 13, 14 and

15 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.265 of 2011 of Supreme

Court of India is enclosed herewith.

The use of black film is banned. There are

acceptable level of visual light transmission. For the

front and rear side the acceptable visual light

transmission is 70% and for the side the VLT is 50%.

What are the instructions given to

Hyderabad Traffic Police on checking

the usage of sun control film on cars ? I

observe that the Traffic Police are

writing challans irrespective of the visual

light transmission levels (VLT). In fact

they do not have any wherewithal to

find out what is the level of VLT of a film

?

As per the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgment. The

Hyderabad Traffic Police are writing challans, it is

clearly mentioned in the judgment copy that the use

of black film or any other material upon safety glass,

side glass windscreen is IMPERMISSIBLE. It is the VLT of

the safety glass without any additional material

being pasted upon the safety glasses which must

conform with manufacturer specification. The

Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the

manufacturer of the vehicle may manufacture the

vehicle with Tinted Glasses which have Visual Light

Transmission of Safety glasses, front and rear wind

screens have 70% VLT and side glasses have 50% VLT

respectively. No black films or any material can be

pasted on wind screen and side glasses.

We have a Vilkswagen Vento car which

has been affixed with sun control film

within the permissible limits of visual light

transmission levels under Motor Vehicles

Act as explained to us by the company

while giving delivery. The film was

affixed by the company prior to delivery

On 19-01-2013 at 1800 hours, Sri P. Narsimah Reddy, SI

of Tr.PS Narayanaguda while performing duty at

Basheer Bagh cross road has guideline issued by the

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and against using of

black film by Sri Sanjeeva Reddy in car bearing

No.AP11Am-6959, vide Petty case No.2099, vide

Challan receipt No.834013 U/s 100(ii) /177, 184, 179

04-02-2013

3

of the car in Oct., 2011 from the show

room. However, we are fined Rs.900/-

vide Challan No.834013 when Mr. PS

Rao, Traffic Police stopped us on 19-01-

2013 at Basheerbagh cross roads. He

and the Inspector insisted that no film

should be there on the car glasses.

When we tried to explain them about

the film being within the MV Act limits,

we realized that they were not even

aware of VLT. They bluntly said, pay the

fine or we will not allow you to move

and take the vehicle into custody. To

say the least, the behavior of both

Mr.P.S. Rao and the Inspector was

barbaric.

MV Act and compounded Rs.900/-. The allegations

made by the applicant regarding are far from true.

The Inspector and SI are aware of the rule position

and they have implemented the orders of the

Hon’ble Supreme Court in true spirit.

4

3 Tr.T8/541/2013,

Dt.31-01-2013.

Sri S. Mahender Reddy,

R/o Plot No.96,

Raghavendra Nagar,

Hayath Nagar,

RR District – 501 505.

Who are allowed to keep Red/Blue

Beacons on Cars? List of Categories.

In pursuance of powers under clause (iii) of provision

to rule 108 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989,

the Central Government hereby specified that

vehicles carrying high degnitaries shall be permitted

to use:-

Red Light with Flasher in the top front of the vehicles,

while on duty anywhere in the country:-

President

Vice-President

Prime Minister

Former Presidents

Deputy Prime Minister

Chief Justice of India

Speaker of the Lok sabha

Cabinet Ministers of the Union

Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission

Former Prime Ministers

Leaders of the opposition in the Rajya Sabha and Lok

Sabha

Judges of Supreme Court.

Red Light without Flasher on the top front of the

vehicle, while on duty anywhere in the country:

Chief Election Commissioner

Comptroller and Auditor General of India

Deputy Chairman, Rajya Sabha

31-01-2013

5

Deputy Speaker, Lok Sabha

Ministers of the State of the Union.

Members of Planning Commission

Attorney General of India

Cabinet Secretary

Chief of Staff of the three services holding ran of full

General or equivalent rank.

Deputy Ministers of the Union.

Officiating Chiefs of the three services holding the

rank of Lt.General or equivalent rank.

Chairman, Central Administrative Tribunal.

Chairman, Minorities Commission.

Chairman, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

Commission.

Chairman, Union Public Service Commission.

As per the Rule 313 of Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicle

Rules, 1989 the following dignitaries can use RED

LIGHT on top front of the vehicle:

Governor of Andhra Pradesh

Vehicles escorting the vehicle of Governor

Chief Secretary to Government.

Director General of Police.

6

Chief Justice of the High Court.

Judges of the High Court.

Lokayukta.

Chairman, A.P.Administrative Tribunal.

Vice Chairman, Central Administrative Tribunal.

As per Rule 314 of A.P.Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, the

following dignitaries can use BLUE LIGHTS on top front

of the vehicles:

Chief Miniter of Andhra Pradesh

All Ministers

Chairman, State Planning Board.

Speaker of A.P.Legislative Assembly

Chairman, A.P.Legislative Council.

Deputy Speaker, A.P.Legislative Assembly.

Deputy Chairman, A.P.Legislative Council.

In case the vehicle fitted with Red or Blue light on top

front is not carrying dignitaries, then such light shall

not be used and be covered by a black cover.

What are the actions you are going to

take on them who misuse and keep

Beacons on cars?

If the vehicles found misuse and keep Beacons on

cars we will book the cases under M.V. Act rules

against the Violators.

How many cases are booked under

misuse of Beacons issue?. How much

you have collected from them.

So far we are not booked any Cases in this Head in

the Limits of Traffic Central Zone.

What if they again misuse the using of In future any one found misusing the Beacon lights

7

Beacons? on their cars we book the Cases against them.

4 Tr.T8/602/2013,

Dt.07-02-2013.

Sri Mahesh Agarwal,

S/o. Nandlal Agarwal,

6109, 6th Block, JP

Mahanagar,

Balapur X Roads,

Hyderabad – 5000 97.

Daily/Weekly charges levied for

releasing the impounded animals from

the Cattle Pound animal wise ?

This matter pertains to the Greater Hyderabad

Municipal Corporation.

18-02-2013

No. of cases booked in the last five

years and the No. of animals kept at

Cattle Pound year wise ?

This aspect is not concerned to Hyderabad Traffic

Police. This matter pertains to the Greater

Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

No. of revenue collected as

compounding charges for the last five

years ?

This aspect is not concerned to Hyderabad Traffic

Police. This matter pertains to the Greater

Hyderabad Municipal Corporation.

5 Tr.T8/847/2013,

Dt.19-02-2013.

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,

Thiaga Brammam Street,

Subramania Nagar, Salem

– 636005,

Tamilnadu.

The Image properties provided vide

letter No.Tr.T8/3269/2012, dt.09-12-2012

by the Addl.CP., Traffic does not

contain the camera details (Make:

Sony, Model: DSC – W210, Year:2008)

connected to the traffic offence of

jumping signal on 25-08-2012 at time

16:24 at Sangeeth X Road under

Gopalpuram Tr.PS limits based on which

e-Challan were issued to the owners of

the vehicle numbers AP11AJ-1375,

AP09CK-1728, AP10AQ-6270,

even though the camera details are

deemed to be available with the

Hyderabad Traffic Police, since 25-08-

2012 at time 16:24.

On 09-12-2012 we have provided the information on

your question No. 1 as follows:

Your question No.1 A detailed report/explanation

containing cogent reasons for the date and time

stamp not being embedded in the photo.

Our answer : Hyderabad Traffic Police are using Sony

Digital Cameras for capturing the traffic violations on

the field which don’t have features embedded and

imprinted of the date and time on the violation

photo. The date and time can view from the image

properties and it is a permanent record. It is a clear

evidence shown in the photograph of jumping on

red light signal.

You have asked above question subsequently we

have answered the same.

Once again we are enclosing the certified copy of

violation photograph taken on 25-08-2012 at time

16.24 at Sangeeth X Road under Tr.PS Gopalpuram

limits, which is taken by the Sony Digital Camera.

26-02-2013

8

If no information is available for para 1,

then the copies of records containing

the information / reasons recorded

therein for the same.

Already clarified in above para.




on any working day and consult the undersigned

appointment.

6 Tr.T8/4673/2013,

Dt.11-02-2013.

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.

Certified copy of the record containing

the information / cogent reasons for the

non-appearance / non availability of

the camera details (Make: Sony, Model

:DSC-W210, Year:2008) in the image

properties provided by the Hyderabad

Police vide letter No.Tr.T8/3269/2012,

dt.09-12-12 by the Addl.CP., Traffic,

Hyderabad, connected to the traffic

offence of jumping signal on 25-08-12 at

time 16:24 at Sangeeth X Road under




AP09CK-1728, AP10AQ-6270, whereas

the camera details was deemed to be

available with the Hyderabad Traffic

With reference to your question of your letter, dt.09-

11-2012, we have provide the information as follows:-

Q.No.1. A detailed report / explanation containing

cogent reasons for the date and time stamp not

being embedded in the photo.

Ans: Hyderabad Traffic Police are using Sony Digital

Cameras for capturing the traffic violations on the

field which don’t have features embedded and





red light signal.

You did not requested the camera make,

26-02-2013

9

Police, since 25-08-12 at time 16:24.

model and manufactured year at that time.

Moreover you have requested on 27-12-2012 for the

camera make, model and year, subsequently we

have provided the same on 24-01-2013. However, a

copy of the same is enclosed.

It is certified that, no software’s or tools are used to

tamper or alter the image properties of the violation

photo which was provided to you.



non-availability of / for not providing

independent corroborative materials as

requested in para 6 of the RTI

application, dt.27-12-12 filed by the

undersigned, except a bald statement

by the Public Information Officer, for

answer to Q. No.6, in the letter

dated:24-01-13, that photograph taken

on 25-08-2012 at 16:24 hours is genuine

and the image properties in the said

camera cannot be altered, without

providing independent corroborative

materials or records justifying the same.

The Hyderabad Traffic Police clearly provided the

information on 24-01-2013 on your question

(6) of your letter, dt.27-12-2012.

We have already informed that, no software’s or

tools are used to tamper or alter the image

properties of the violation photograph. It is an official

arthritic information was provided and certified that

violation photograph is genuine and not have been

manipulated or alteration in the photograph. It is was

already justified in information provided earlier.

10

If no information / record(s) is / are

available for some / all / part of the

paras in this application, then the

copies of the records containing the

information / reasons recorded therein

for the same.

Already clarified in paras 1 to 2.




on any working day and consult with PIO or

Inspector, e-Challan.

7 Tr.T8/852/2013,

Dt.25-02-2013.

Sri P. Narsaiah,

S/o Sri P. Yellaiah,

H.No.3-14-375, Durga

Colony,

(Yadav Nagar),

Hanamkonda,

WARANGAL.

The following detailed documents of mentioned

events of the last four years (2008 to 2011) against on

the name of Mr. K.R. Nagaraju.

Criminal cases /Enquiries.

Civil Cases / Enquires.

Vigilance cases / Enquiries.

Department Enquires / results.

It is to inform that the above

information is not pertaining to Hyderabad Traffic

Police.

18-04-2013

8 Tr.T8/1129/2013,

Dt.12-03-2013.

HO Memo

No.L&O/A6/RTI/Act/296/

13,

Dt. -03-2013.

Miss Reddy Sailaja Devi,

R/o Building No.18, Infosys

Technologies Ltd.,

Manikonda,

Hyderabad - 32.

I am herewith enclosing the detail Statement about

the CCTV Cameras under Hyderabad Police

Jurisdiction, year wise i.e., from 2007 to 2013.

21-03-2013

9 Tr.T8/1139/2013,

Dt.21-03-2013

Sri R. Chingaravelu,

H.No.6, Bloomfield,

Khajaguda,


the original reference dated:15-01-2013 was not

received in this office to provide the information as

desired by you. Your appeal petition, dt.19-03-2013

enclosed also not received in this office.

It is therefore, requested to please

21-03-2013

11

provide a copy of the same to this office to furnish

the information, as desired by you.

10 Tr.T8/1164/2013,

Dt.02-04-2013

Sri Balveer Singh,

H.No.14-10-603,

Opp: Lala Taleem

Dhoolpet,

Jumerath Bazar

Hyderabad.

how much amount impose as penalty

for section violation of 435/177 of Traffic

Rules.

It is to inform that as per GO Ms.No.108, dt.18-08-

2011: Abstract of Government of Andhra Pradesh

Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 – Compounding of offences

under section 200 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 –

Notification issued penalty imposed for Violation of

435/177 is Rs.100 to 200.

02-04-2013

11 Tr.T8/848/2013,

Dt.25-02-2013

Sri Vempati Anand Ramu,

Ro My Kidz 123 Beside

Ganduri Bros, 1-2-162,

Ist floor, Surya Towers,

M.G.Road Suryapet

508213 Andhra Pradesh.

Enclosed Judgement copy of writ

petition No. 265/2011 of Hon’ble

Supreme court and further copies of

Police Department.

List enclosed. 14-03-2013

12 Tr.T8/1097/2013,

Dt.15-03-2013.

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.

The information requested in para.1

vide Ref.(1) is solely connected to the

non-appearance of/non-availability of

the camera

details(Make:Sony,Model:DSC-W210,

Year:2008) in the image properties

provided vide Ref.(3).

In your letter of dt.19.11.2012 para-1 question the PIO

have provided the exact information as you have

requested in your question. There is no deviation

either misleading not unrelated reply to your sort of

information.


vide Ref.(1), is solely connected to the

information stored in the image

properties of the image file.

The violation Date and Time information has been

recorded in the image properties and the same was

requested by you on your letter dt.09.11.2012 and

provided the same on dt.09.12.2012.

Even if the said digital camera does not

have tha ability to embed the date and

time stamp on the image captured for

traffic violation (as claimed by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police), still, the

The violation photos will be kept with Traffic Police

only. Whenever the violator requested for violation

photo we will provided to them. In your case also,

firstly you have requested for violation photo which

was provided to you.

12

camera details as well as the date and

time stamp are always stored in the

image properties of the concerned

image file and is available for those

who has access to the same.

All the relevant information connected

to the image file are stored in the

image properties of that image file and

such information so stored in the image

file are no way connected to/nor

influenced by the ability/inability of the

camera to embed the date and time

stamp in the image captured

connected to the traffic violation.

It is already informed that, date and time stamp is

embedded in the image properties of violation

photo and same was provided to you.

The information requested in para.I vide

Ref.(1) is not connected to the

embedding and imprinting of the date,

time stamp on the violation image by

the digital camera used by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police.

In your Lr.dt.09.11.2012, you have requested for

Q. A detailed report / explaining containing, cogent

reasons for the date and time stamp not being

embedded in the photo? Information was proved as


Camera for capturing the traffic violations on the

field which don’t have featured embedded and



properties and it is a permanent record. It is clear


red light signal

On 09.11.2012 no issue was raised and need

not mentioned of non availability/ availability of

camera details at time of violation photo taken with

the digital camera. On 25.08.2012 at 16.24 hrs.

13

On 27.12.2012, you have requested camera

make, model and specification details subsequently

details are provided on 24.01.2013.

The information requested in Para.1,

Vide Ref.(1) is not connected to the

ability/inability of the digital camera

used by the Traffic Police either to

embed the date and time stamp on

the image connected to traffic

violation.

Already informed in Para (5) above.

The reply provided by the Public

Information officer vide Reg.(2) being

related to the lack of features of the

Sony Digital Camera to embed the

date, time stamp in the violation photo,

is in no way related to the specific

information requested in para.1 vide

Reg.(1).


14

13 Tr.T8/1188/2013,

Dt.25-03-2013

Sri R. Chingravelu,

R/o H.No.6, Bloomfield,

Khajaguda,

Hyderabad-500 008.

Any letter or notice or instructions send

to Traffic Police Stations directing them

to do the above detaining of vehicles,

adding s. 179(1) and s. 184 etc of CMV

act)

As per the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 and A.P. Motor

Vehicle Rules 1989 Police Officer of and above the

Rank of Sub-Inspector of Police is authorized to

compound the offences. As per the instructions of

Commissioner of Police/Addl.Commissioner of Police,

Traffic, Hyderabad and as per the judgment of

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India vie W.P. (Civil)

No.265 of 2011 clearly given judgment in Para 24. We

are really not emphasizing on the security threat to

the society at large by use of black films but it is a

clear violation of law. In terms of Rul1 100, no

material including films of any VLT can be pasted on

the safety glasses of the car and this law is required

to be enforced without demur and delay. Thus we

pass the following orders:

18-04-2013

15

1) All the applications filed for clarification and

modification are dismissed, however,

without any order as to costs.

2) All the Director General of Police/Commissioner of

Police are hereby again

directed to ensure complete compliance of the

judgment of court in its true spirit

and substance. They shall not permit pasting of

any material, including films of any

VLT, on the safety glasses of any vehicles.

Sec: 179. Disobedience of orders, obstruction and

refusal of information.

Sec: 184. Diriving dangerously (enclosed).

Any authority or G.O under which your

Police Men are detaining our vehicles

until we pay up the Challan on the spot

(especially for Minor Offences)

As per the A.P. Motor Vehciles Rules 1989 in Chapter

X it is clearly authorized in the following sections.

454. The powers exercisable by a Police Officer.

447. Power to impound documents.

448. Powers to detain vehicles.

Any authority or the G.O that empowers

your department to issue public notice

and Challan under s. 179 (1) and s. 184

of CMV Act for disobeying the same.

As mentioned and enclosed as ready reference.

16

14 Tr.T8/1215/2013,

Dt.28-03-2013

Sri R. Chingravelu,


Khajaguda,

Hyderabad-500 008.

List enclosed 24-04-2013

15 Tr.T8/1216/2013,

Dt.28-03-2013

Sri R. Chingravelu,


Khajaguda,

Hyderabad-500 008.

Authority (G.O. or others) under which

traffic police issued challans & on spot

collected Rs.100/- for violations Sec.92 &

S.100 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules.

Supreme Court of India pronounced judgment on

usage of safety glasses after dismissing the

applications filed for clarification and modification

vide I.A. Nos.4, 5, I.A. Nos 6 -8, I.A. Nos. 9-11, 12, 13, 14

and 15 in W.P (Civil) No.265 of 2011 and directed all

the Director Generals of Police to ensure compliance

of the judgment without default, demur and delay.

“We reiterate that the police authorities shall not only

Challan the offenders but ensure that the black or

any other films or material pasted on the safety

glasses are removed forthwith”

18-04-2013

Authority (G.O. or others) under which

traffic police issued challans & on spot

collected Rs.500/- to Rs.1000/- for

violations Sec. 92 S. 100 of Central

Motor Vehicle Rules.

According to the following ratified sections of laws,

the traffic police are authorized to issue challans:

1) Section 100 of Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

2) Section 179(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

“Whosoever willfully disobeys any directions lawfully

given by any persons or authority empowered under

this Act to give such directions be punishable with

imprisonment for a term which may extend to one

month, or with fine which may extend to Rs.500/- or

with both”.

3) Section 184 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 “Whoever

drives a motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner

which is dangerous to the public, having regard to all

the circumstances of the case including the nature,

conditions and use of the place where the vehicle is

driven shall be punishable for the first offence with

imprisonment for a term which may extend to six

17

months or fine which may extend to Rs.1000/-

16 Tr.T8/1123/2013,

Dt.19-03-2013

Sri S. Ramalingam,

R/o 1-8-1, HIG B-5, Flat-3,

Baglingampally,


Please furnish the information regarding

working hours operation of Telephone

No. 9010203626.

The working hours of the Telephone No.9010203626 is

from 8.00 AM to 10.00 PM.

Reply sent by

APIO

20-03-2013

Kindly furnish the information of Non-

functioning of Traffic Help Line bearing

No.1073. Since how long it’s not

functioning and reasons for not

functioning and steps taken to rectify

the same.

The traffic Help Line toll free No.1073 has hardly

received 2 to 3 phone calls a day even after vide

publicity there was not much response from the

public hence the connection was disconnected.

The Traffic Help Line toll free No.1073 has stopped it’s

services from the year 2009, in place of 9010203626

introduced.

18

17 Tr.T8/1128/2013,

Dt.20-03-2013

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.

The names and designation of the

Officials, staffs responsible and

instrumental for providing false /

misleading information in Ref.[1],

wherein it is claimed by the Public

Information Officer that the date and

time in the image properties provided

vide Ref.[3], cannot be altered and it is

genuine. Note: The said claim by the

Public Information Officer vide Ref[1] is

totally contrary of the information

provided by the Sony Corporation,

where the procedure by which date

and time stamp can be altered /

inserted in the image taken by the

cameras (Make: SONY, Model: DSC-

W210, Year: 2008) is provided in detail.

We have not provided any false/misleading

information.

09-04-2013

19

The names and designation of the

Officials, staffs responsible and

instrumental for providing false /

misleading information in Ref.[2],

mentioning the reasons for the date

and time stamp not being embedded

on the violation photo provided vide

Ref[3] Note: The reply by the Public

Information Officer vide Ref[2] is totally

contrary to the information provided by

the Sony Corporation, in its website,

where the procedure by which date

stamp can be embedded / inserted in

the image by the camera (Make:

SONY, Model: DSC-W210, Year: 2008) is

provided in detail.

We have not provided any false/misleading

information.

Copies of the records containing the


as well as the names and designation of

the Officials staff responsible for not

attaching the traffic violation photo

along with e-challan 2012HA596439

which was sent by the post, where as

the photo of the traffic violation for the

vehicle AP10AQ6270 is deemed to be


Police, since 25-08-2012 at time 16:24

hrs.

This information is not available as the procedure

mentioned in the question is not practiced.

Copies of the records containing

information on the disciplinary action

taken on those Officials, staffs

responsible for not attaching the traffic

This information is not available as the procedure

mentioned in the question is not practiced.

20

violation photo along with the e-challan

2012HA596439 which was sent by the

post, where as the photo of the traffic

violation for the vehicle AP10AQ6270 is



2012 at time 16:24 hrs.

Copies of the rules, regulations,

procedure by which Hyderabad Traffic

Police is allowed to send e-challan by

post for jumping signal even without

attaching the relevant traffic violation

photo pertaining to the vehicle which is

claimed by the traffic police, to have

jumped the signal.

Hyderabad Traffic Police is implementing the rule for

signal jumping under R 436/177 of MV Act and fine

amount is being collected as Rs. 200/-. There are two

type of enforcement one is contact (direct)

enforcement where the violator is caught on the

field and issue spot challan and collected fine

amount immediately.

Second one is Non- contact enforcement where

violations are captured through cameras and

through the RTA address data base e-challans are

being sent to the concerned vehicle owners through

post vide under Section 133 of MV Act. All violations

photos are kept with Hyderabad Traffic Police and

whenever violators request for violation photo, the

same will be provided to them. The violator has to

pay the fine amount at the e-seva / AP Online

centers and fine amount will be remitted in the AP

State Govt. Treasury directly.

If no information is available for Para

1,2,3,4,5 then the copies of the records

containing the information / reasons

recorded therein for the same.

All the information regarding above paras 1 to 5

have been provided.

21

18 Tr.T8/1237/2013,

Dt.20-04-2013

Sri Ch. S. Ravi Teja,

Sowjanya Nilayam,

Dr.No.17-2-15/2,

Ravulapeta, Mandapeta,

East Godawari District.

To implement RTI act section 4(1)(a)

every record, tables & other info should

be maintained, please give info on,

steps your office took in this regard.

Under the Addl.CP., Traffic, Hyderabad, there are (2)

DCPs, (2) Addl.DCPs and (7) ACPs and (25) Traffic

Police Stations. They are maintaining all statutory

records, Tables and other information in their

respective police Stations under the supervision of

Inspectors and Station Writers.

20-04-2013

According to RTI every office should

maintain all GO’s, Memo’s, Circulars

issued by government & also info of

steps taken on those GO’s, Memo’s &

Circulars. So what steps your office took

for ensuring this?

It is to inform that the required information is

available at website of the Govt. of AP.

Send me complete 2011, 2012 years

data of GO’s, Memo’s & Circulars

issued by government & also info of

steps your office took on those GO’s,

Memo’s & Circulars.

Please make yourself convenient to Visit Traffic




Inspector, Admn/e-Challan.

According to section 4(1)(b) every

office should provide info regarding 17

issues voluntarily to public without any

payment. So, are you providing the

info?

If yes from which date you are

giving this info? Through which sources

you are providing this info to public ?

please give me this 4 (1) (b) info of

each & every police station.

Already informed in question (3) above.

22

4(1)(b) info should be updated, So on

what dates, the info had been updated

& for what reasons? Please send me

that date also.

In Hyderabad Traffic Police, every day the

information is updated.

Indian Government ordered to give

4(1)(b) info officially on your website,

did your department accomplish the

task of digitalization of 4(1)(b) info or

not? Are you providing the info through

your website or not?

If yes on which date your

department updated 4(1)(b) info on

your website.


On the receipts issued by traffic police,

your department is mentioning M.V. Act

Vide G.O. Ms No 138 , dated 28.03.2006

of the government of A.P., to the

revised fines for offences. Please send

me that G.O. & why you are officially

not giving this info on your website?


I have 3 receipts with me issued by

Mahankali traffic PS & Panjagutta PS.

With serial No. V & No.s 337969, 589545,

589584. I am sending Xerox of that

receipts, authenticate them with your

signature & stamp if they are original

receipts issued by your department &

send me back that Xerox’s.

1) It is true that one of the e-Challan were issued to

petitioner, vide No.337969, Serial

No.V, on 03-03-2013 at 0950 hours by SI, Sri Y.Basha

Moinuddin of Tr.PS

Mahankali for wrong parking his vehicle bearing

No.AP05CE-2783 at Ingate of

Railway Station and the original is attested.

2) Receipt No.589545 and 589564 are issued by L&O

Police Panjagutta.

23

Who has the authority to issue these

receipts books to traffic police? How

much fine your department collected

for the years of 2011 & 2012 in the form

of these fines?

It is to inform that the fine amount collected at Traffic

Compounding Booth during the year 2011 and 2012

details as follows:-

Sl.No. Year Total

1. 2011 10,13,21,900/-

2. 2012 13,24,60,550/-

Who has the authority to fine public on

traffic rules violation?

The Hyderabad Traffic Police SI’s, and above rank

officer has the authority to fine public on traffic

violation.

What actions do your department take,

if the receipt given by traffic police or

law & order police is proved fake?

If the receipt given by traffic police or law & order

police is proved fake, the Police Department action

will be taken against them as per the law.

Order police are also monitoring traffic

with their constables. Is there any

compulsion for them to from traffic

department to do your department

work?

The law &order Police are also monitoring traffic with

their staff and there is no compulsion for them from

Traffic Police.

Is there is any necessity to concerned SI

of Law & order dept. who is monitoring

traffic to take permission SHO?

The L&O SI’s while performing their Law & Order

duties can regulate traffic as it is also part of their

duty.

What are the rules for law & order dept.

SI to monitor traffic dept.?

There is no separate rule for law & order SI to monitor

the traffic duty.

24

Give me the details of all receipts

books issued in 2011 & 2012 …… send

me the serial No of the book series No. (

from which No. to which No.) & for

which station the respective book is

issued?


Hyderabad. Trafficpolice.co.in is this site

your official website?

If yes give me the below details.

It is not the official website.

19 Tr.T8/1350/2013,

Dt.10-04-2013

Sri V. Anand Ramu,

R/o My Kidz 123, Surya

Towers,

1st floor, MG Road,

Suryapet-508213.

Request to furnish full details of Duties

and place of postings of staff (including

Home Guards and PC’s) of Tr.PS

Saifabad on the evening of 26-11-2012

from 5 PM to 11 PM. ?

List enclosed.

02-05-2013

Request to furnish full details of Pollution

checkup in respect of Hyderabad

Traffic Police vehicles in the year 2012. ?

The pollution check up was not carried out during

the year 2012.

Whether the rules regarding wearing of

Helmets by Motorcyclist while driving is

in implementation or not in A.P. ?

It is being implemented.

Furnish the information, whether the

seat belts of Hyderabad Traffic Police

Vehicles are working or not?

The Hyderabad Traffic Police four wheeler vehicle

seat belts are working.

Request to furnish the information

regarding the implementation of Sec. 4

(b) in Tr.PS Saifabad.




on any working day and consult with PIO or Inspr.,

Admn., Traffic Cell.

25

Request to furnish the Rank and Address

details of APIO, PIO and Appellate

Authority of Tr.PS Saifabad.

In Hyderabad Traffic Police: Sri. C.V. Anand, IPS,

Addl. Commissioner of Police, Traffic Branch is

Appellate Authority under RTI Act, Sri. Syam Sundar,

IPS, DCP, Traffic-II, is PIO under RTI Act and Sri.

Madhu, ACP, Traffic-VII is APIO under RTI Act., O/o

Traffic Complex, Opp. Assembly, Hyderabad.

Request to furnish the address

particulars of Traffic Training Institute

and also furnish the details of the

officers, who conducted counseling

from 01-04-2012 to 18-03-2013

including list of persons those who

attended for counseling.




on any working day and consult with PIO or RI., TTI.

Request to furnish the detail information

that, what are the action can be taken

by the officer, when a case booked

under Sec. 184 M.V.Act.

After booked the case under Sec. 184 M.V. Act the

following steps will be taken:

the violator will be compounded and fine amount

will be collected and original receipt will be issued to

violator after taken his signature.

If the violator is under age (below 18 age), the case

is booked and same send to TTI for counseling, where

the concerned officer will be counseled him. After

attended counseling, the violator vehicle should be

released at Police Stations after collected fine

amount.

If the person not having sufficient money to pay the

compounding fee, the vehicle original documents

will be sent to Traffic Compounding Booth, where the

violator can paid the amount and collect the

documents.

26

Request to furnish the details, if the

addresses are changed in RC and DL,

which are in Traffic Compounding

Booth and the officer to whom to be

informed the details.

This Question is not clear.

20 Tr.T8/1395/2013,

Dt.16-04-2013

Sri G.Balwanth Reddy,

Advocate

Plot No. 12-13-6-

439/1/A/12

Pulla Reddy Building,

Ist Floor, Balaji Nagar,

Gudimalkapur,

Hyderabad 67.

How Many wrong parking challans are

made and how much amount received

between Shiv Bagh X road,

Gudimalkapur to Laxmi Nagar X roads

by Toli Chowki Traffic Police Station

since 30/06/2012 to Ist of April 2013

There are (1550) wrong parking cases (challans)

issued and Rs.1,60,000/-collected as fine against who

are parking their vehicles at No parking places in

between Shiva Bagh X road to Laxminagar since 30-

06-2012 to 1st April-2013

03-05-2013

How many wrong parkin

g photographs taken by Toli Chwoki

Traffic Police Station, at Shivam Bagh X

road to Laxminagar road in digital

camers and what follow up action

taken there-upon on which how much

amount received between Shiv bagh X

road, Gudimalkapur to Laxmi roads

since 30-06-2012 to 1st April-2013.

There are ( 950 ) wrong parking photographs taken

by digital cameras against the traffic rules violators

and parking their vehicles at No parking places in

between Shiva Bagh X road to Laxminagar and

raised e-challans against them and sent to camera

control for further proceedings. The e-challan

amount paid the violators at E-Seva Centers/ Traffic

control, the amount details not concerned to PSs.

How many Digital Cameras are allotted

to Toli Chowki, Traffic Police Station and

Asif Nagar Traffic Police Station and

How many cameras in working

condition.

There are 23 Digital cameras allotted to traffic Police

Station Toli Chowki for booking of cases against the

traffic violators, and at present 11 Cameras were

working condition

27

How many signal jump cases booked at

Rethibowli X roads since 30/06/2012 to

01-04-2013 with Digital Camera

During the above period total 356 cases of Signal

Jumping cases were booked.

How many Drunken Drive cases are

booked during the 30/06/2012 to 1st

April-2013. by Asifnagar Traffic Police

Station and what was the fine amount

collected.

There are ( 151 ) Drunken Driving cases booked and

amount Rs. 3,49,200 /- In Tr. PS Asifnagar 2)

Tr.PS.Tolichowki total (295) DD Cases were booked

during the period and an amount of Rs 601700/- was

compounded in the Hon’ble Court. from 30/06/2012

to 1st April-2013

How many cases are booked for

footpath occupied by the shops and

push carts/Sugar Can

e Juice, Floors Vendors, Vegetables

vendors etc between Shiv Bagh X road,

Gudimalkapur to Laxmi Nagar X roads

and Mehedipatnam OLD X roads to

Rethobowli X roads since 30-06-12 to 01-

04-13

There are ( 1850) cases booked U/s 39 B CP Act

against the shops, push cart vendors, sugar cane

juice vendors, vegetable vendors who have

occupied footpath from shiva Bagh X road to

Gudimalkapur and Laxminagar and Mehdipatnam

area’s 30/06/2012 to 1st April-2013.

How many e-challans are send during

the 30/06/2012 to 1st April-2013. by Asif

Nagar Traffic Police Station and what

was the fine amount collected by the

Police Station.

1)Tr.PS.Asifnagar during 30/06/2012 to 1st April-

2013.(49323) cases2) The Tr.PS.Tolichowki also booked

68513 e-Challan.


Nanal Nagar T roads since 30-06-12 to

01-04-13 with the help of Digital Camera


Jumping cases.


Toli Chowki X roads since 30-06-12 to 01-

04-13 with Digital Camera


Jumping cases.

28


Masab Tank X roads since 30-06-12 to

01-04-13. with Digital Camera

(805) Signal Jump cases booked at Masab Tank X

road since 30/06/2012 to 1st April-2013.

21 Tr.T8/1433/2013,

Dt.20-04-2013

Sri G. Rajesekhar,

H.No.1-7-131, Hari Nagar,

Musheerabad,

Hyderabad .

Copies of the proceedings of the

competent Authority of our department

by which from GPO X Roads towards

Nampally Railyway Station made and

converted into one way together with

the arrangements made or stipulated in

respect of parking of Two wheelers or

Four wheelers parking and the reasons

of if any for converting the said road

from two way to one way.

Information not available in this office.

10-05-2013

Copies of the later on if any

proceedings taken Place, by which any

changes or modification are affected

there to in the above matter.

Information not available in this office.

22 Tr.T8/1482/2013,

Dt.10-05-2013

Sri C.J. Karira,

R/o Plot No.26, Road No.1,

Balamrai Society,

Mahendra Hills,

Secunderabad.

Fixing of Red Beacon Light/Blue Beacon

Light/Amber Beacon Light on Vehicles.

A List of VIP/VVIP who are carrying different beacon

lights is enclosed herewith.

10-05-2013

Permission to put “On Government

Service” or other such matter on

number/licence plates of vehicles

The matter regarding permissions for beacon a light is

pertains to Home Department.

29

23 Tr.T8/1525/2013,

Dt.26-04-2013

Sri Kanike Parashar,

Asst. Manager,

The New India Assurance

Co., Ltd.,

Third Party Hub, 5-2-174/2,

IInd Floor,

Madan Mohan Building,

R.P. Road,

Secunderabad – 500 003.

In response to your letter cited requesting to furnish a

copy of the Agreement between K.V. Raghava Rao

and Police Authorities in respect of Traffic Recovery

Van bearing No.AP09B-P-3170, it is to inform that it is

a certified copy mutual agreement between the

party and Police authorities and the same cannot

be furnished.(Without due consent of the party).

However, it you desire to check the

agreement you can visit the Traffic Complex for

having clarity of your Questions so that the HTP may

supply required information duly seeking on any

working day and consult with APIO or Inspector,

Admn., Traffic Cell.

27-04-2013

24 Tr.T8/2674/2013,

Dt.-5-05-2013

Sri G. Purushotham,

R/o H.No.6-458/40/1,

Madhusudan Reddy

Nagar,

Chintal,

Hyderabad - 54 .

3 years back Saradhi Studio to

Yousufguda Basti the Traffic Police was

one way imposed. Now it is one way or

others please tell us.

There is no one way from Saradhi Studio Diverson to

Yousufguda Basti.

Those who are not following the one

way traffic rules, what steps are to be

taken against the violators.

Since, there is no one way, there is no scope to book

cases under the M.V. Act Rules.

Till now how many cases are booked. No cases have been booked.

25 Tr.T8/1617/2013,

Dt.-03-05-2013

Sri G. Purushotham,

R/o H.No.6-458/40/1,

Madhusudan Reddy

Nagar,

How many APS RTC buses and how

many times violated traffic rules and

regulation from January 2012 to till the

date and submit their details?

For the year 2012 e-Challan issued against APSRTC –

6518

For the year 2013 e-Challan issued against APSRTC –

499 till to-day.

22-05-2013

30

Chintal,

Hyderabad - 54 .

For the details of RTC buses it is to inform you to

make yourself convenient to visit Traffic Police

Complex for having clarity of your Questions and also

the HTP can supply whatever documents you need

to inspect, on any working day.

What is the fine amount for violations of

traffic rules?

Amount to be fined according to M.V. Act/depends

on traffic violation.

Signal Jumping - 200

Stop Line Crossing - 100

Cell Phone Driving - 500

Rash Negligent Driving - 200

How much amount has been paid by

APS RTC against traffic violations?

From January, 2012 to till date amount of

Rs.1,92,565/- paid.

Note: The drivers of the individual RTC buses have

paid penalty, when they violated the traffic rules.

As per rules what kind of action will be

taken for not payment of challan?

The Special Teams are deployed for every ACP

Division every month pending e-Challans

against RTC will be generated and above teams will

go Depot wise and peruse the payments. Their

Depot Managers will deduct the fine amount from

concerned RTC Drivers and pay through cheques.

What kind of action has been taken

against those are not payment of

challan. Give details ?

As above answer 4.

31

26 Tr.T8/1737/2013,

Dt.-13-05-2013

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.

it is to state that, the reply furnished vide this office

letters cited 2nd to 5th. ( (3) furnished by PIO and (1)

by Appellate Authority).

The information furnished in the said letters is

authentic and clear.

However, it is to inform you to make yourself

convenient to visit Traffic Police Complex for having

clarity of your Questions and also the HTP can supply

whatever documents you need to inspect, on any

working day.

22-05-2013

27 Tr.T8/1833/2013,

Dt.-22-05-2013

Sri Mahesh Agarwal,

6109, 6th Block, J.P.

Mahanagar,

Balapur X Roads,

Hyderabad – 500097.

The list of Nodal Officers appointed in the last (5)

years, and Minutes of the review meeting of cruelty

to animals for the last (5) years month wise on Animal

Law. A NIL report may please be treated from Traffic

Branch, Hyderabad.

22-05-2013

28 Tr.T8/1168/2013,

Dt.-03-05-2013


H.No.6, Bloomfield,

Khajaguda,


it is to inform that for# 1 to 3:- As per Hon’ble

Supreme Court of India vide IA No’s 4,5, I.A Nos. 6-8

I.A Nos. 9-11,12,13,14 and 15 in W.P. (Civil) no

265 of 2011 of Avishek Goenka V/S Union of India

and Anr. Judgment dated: 3rd August 2012 in column

No;

24. We are really not emphasizing on the

security threat to the society at large by use of

black films but it is a clear violation of law. In terms of

Rule 100, no material including films of any VLT can

29-05-2013

32

be pasted on the safety glasses of the car and this

law is required to be enforced without demur and

delay. Thus, we pass the following orders:

1) All the applications filed for clarification and

modification are dismissed, however,

without any order as to costs.

2) All the Director Generals of Police/Commissioners

of Police are hereby again directed to ensure

complete compliance of the judgment of this Court

in its true spirit and substance. They shall not

permit pasting of any material, including films of any

VLT, on the safety glasses of any vehicle.

3) We reiterate that the police authorities shall not

only challan the offenders but ensure that the

black or any other films or material pasted on the

safety glasses are removed forthwith.

As per the Judgment of Hon’ble Supreme

Court the C.P./Addl. Commissioner of Police, Traffic

issued public notice U/S 21 and 22 of Hyderabad City

Police Act to bring awareness in the public about

33

implementing the Rule and requested all the vehicle

owners/drivers to get all Black Films pasted on the

side glasses and front and rear wind screens,

removed immediately to avoid inconvenience in

future, after giving adequate time and giving vide

publicity in all print and electronic media. The traffic

police has been implementing this rule after getting

orders from the Director General of Police.

When anyone willfully disobeys the direction

given by the Hon’ble Supreme Court the section of

law, i.e., 179 M.V. Act and 184 M.V.Act has been

added. As per the chapter V rule 92 CMVR 1989 and

207 M.V. Act the vehicles can be detained of they

did not pay the compounding amount.

As per the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and as

per rule 447 to 450 A.P. motor 1989 police officer of

and above the rank of Sub-Inspector of police is

authorized to compound the offences and has the

authority to detain the vehicles (as explained

above). It is not necessary to get orders to implement

the Act against the violators as it is clearly

mentioned in the act and the rules.

34

29 Tr.T8/1768/2013,

Dt.-15-05-2013

Sri Basant Kumar Soni,

15-2-204, Maharaj Gunj,

Hyderabad.

Under which provision of Law i.e.

section/order/G.O that the police has

been authorized to challan the erroring

driver through Hyderabad e-

challan system, please provide the

copy of the same.

Under Section 133 of M.V. Act-1988 e-Challan Notice

will be sent to the vehicle owner.

06-06-2013

What is the UCH charges and for what

the charge are collected and under

which provision of law i.e.

section/order/G.O. that the police has

been authorized to collect the said

charges. Please provide the copy of

the same.

UCH User Charges will be collected under GO

Ms.No.307 Home (Pol. Bud) Department, dt.26-12-

2007 additional compounding fee of Rs.35/- is

collected per e-Challan. This amount is meant for

maintenance of e-Challan system.

1. Rs.5/- for e-Seva/AP Online transaction charges.

2. Rs.15/- for Postal Department expenditure.

3. Rs.10/- for Police Department user charges.

4. Rs.5/- for APTS

Copy of the GO is enclosed.

Please provide me with the information.

If the erroring driver fails to pay fine

amount towards the e-challan or

dispute about alleged violation of

traffic rules in that case is matter been

taken up before the competent court

of law or driver is force to pay the e-

challan amount by detaining his vehicle

as and when it is found ?

In case of nonpayment of e-Challan compounding

amount the matter will be taken to the Traffic Court-

III MM and IV MM.

If the erring driver fails to produce original documents

of the vehicle at the time of checking and found

pending challans on the same vehicle, vehicle will

be detained for not producing the documents.

35

Please provide me with the information

that under which provision of the law

does the police has power to stop the

vehicles on road and collect the dues

towards e-challans in case of the driver

of the vehicle disputes the violation of

traffic rules without taken up the matter

before the competent court of law?

Under Section 177 of M.V. Act-1988 Police Officer has

powers to stop the vehicle and collect the

compounding fine amounts from the erring drivers.

Please provide me information where

the SI police have power to stop any

vehicle (s) for only checking the

documents related to vehicle like

driving licence or pollution certificate,

even driver has not made any violation

of traffic rules on the road. (Excluding

the special checking made during the

festival times or in case of any high alert

on terrorist threat).

Under Section 177 of M.V. Act-1988 Sub-Inspector

and above Rank Officer has powers to stop the

vehicle at any time and check the documents and

he can issue a Challan for document related

violations or Traffic violations on the spot and he can

collect the compounding fine amounts on the spot.

Please provide me information where

the duty constable or Home guard in

absents of the SI Police has powers to

stop any vehicle (s) for only checking

the documents like driving licence or

pollution even driver had not made any

violation of traffic rules.

No powers to Police Constables or Home Guards to

stop the vehicles in absence of SI for checking of

documents.

Please provide me with information

about power of the SI Police to Challan

the driver on the spot if driver of vehicle

fail to produce his driving licence on the

stop, or he is been give an opportunity

for producing the same latter.

Under Section 177 of M.V. Act-1988 Sub-Inspector

and above Rank Officer has powers to stop the

vehicle at any time and check the documents and

he can issue a Challan for document related

violations or Traffic violations on the spot and he can

collect the compounding fine amounts on the spot.

Driver will be given a chance to produce the

36

documents and under section 130/177 of MV Act

vehicle will be kept in PS custody and after checking

of documents fine will be imposed.

Please provide me with the information

about power of the SI Police to Challan

the driver on the spot if driver of vehicle

fail to produce insurance and pollution

certificate on the stop, or he is been

give an opportunity for producing the

same latter without detaining the

vehicle (s), or opportunity is been given

for getting his vehicle insured and

pollution checked by the authorized

RTO agents and produce the same

latter.

At the time of checking above documents should be

valid otherwise it will come under M.V. Act violation.

30 Tr.T8/1783/2013,

Dt.-17-05-2013

Sri Shafi Mohd Khan,

R/o Flat No.201,

Saleem Dream Residency,

Kontinagar,

Mehdipatnam,

Hyderabad.

It is to inform that on 08-04-2013 the crane

in-charge SI Sri. G. Yesudas lifted the vehicles which

were parked and causing inconvenience for free

flow of traffic near Jayabhushan Hospital and wrote

the challan receipts for wrong parking. A Scooter

was also lifted and challan issued u/s 122 MV Act

vide receipt No.883627 and fine of Rs.100/- was

collected and another Challan was issued for lifting

u/s 41(ii) Cr.PC vide receipt No.838484 and fine of Rs.

150/- was collected.

The entrance of Jaya Bhushan Hospital

29-05-2013

37

by-lane has one No-Parking Board vide board

No.3/8, and it indicates that the lane is no parking

area.

Further, it is to inform that the GHMC

authorities has declared the area from Rythubazar

to Rethibowli as “RED ZONE AREA”. To maintain free

flow of traffic, the crane SI has lifted the vehicles

which were parked in No Parking areas.

31 Tr.T8/1788/2013,

Dt.-18-05-2013

Sri A. Sekhar,

R/o H.No.1-20-144,

Rasoolpura Police Line,

Begumpet,


It is to inform that there are no specific rules are

followed for laying of speed breakers. If a stretch of

road becomes accident prone for some reason and

the local residents want to get a speed breaker

constructed an application may be sent to this

office. On receipt of the application, it is analyzed

from traffic point of view and recommendation is

sent to speck breaker committee which decides the

construction or removal of any speed breaker. This

committee consists of representatives of GHMC, R&B,

National Highway Authority, Traffic Police and

concerned Residential Welfare Association.

31-05-2013

38

32 Tr.T8/1350/2013,

Dt.01-06-2013





M.G.Road Suryapet


Request to furnish full details of Duties

and place of postings of staff (including

Home Guards and PC’s) of Tr.PS

Saifabad on the evening of 26-11-2012

from 5 PM to 11 PM. ?

List enclosed.

33 Tr.T8/2070/2013,

Dt.-18-06-2013

Sri V.V.S. Reddy,

R/o 107, 2RT, SR Nagar,


How many cases were booked against

the persons who used the cell phones

during the driving / riding in the year,

2012.

(15058) cases were booked against the persons who

used the cell phones during the driving / riding in the

year, 2012.

22-06-2013


wrong side dring / riding in the year

2012.

(49258) cases were booked against wrong side dring

/ riding in the year, 2012.


triple riding during the year, 2012.

(10720) cases were booked against triple riding

during the year, 2012.


the minor persons during the year, 2012.

(497) cases were booked against the minor persons

during the year, 2012.

15-06-2013

34 Tr.T8/2242/2013,

Dt.-03-07-2013

Sri N. Ravinder Reddy,

H.No.2-2-1140/10,

Near Hanuman Temple,

Nallakunta, Hyderabad.

Yes, the Xerox copy of PUC Certificate enclosed on

which your vehicle number plate has been pictures is

improper.

18-07-2013

35 Tr.T8/2243/2013,

Dt.-04-07-2013

Sri N. Krishna Yadav,

C/o M. Madhana Chari,

Srimanarayana Colony,

LIC Office, 5th Street,

Kodhada Mandal,

There are certain ratifications required to implement

the said GO for which a letter has been addressed to

the Commissioner, Transport Department, which is still

awaited.

18-07-2013

39

Nalgonda District.

36 Tr.T8/2350/2013,

Dt.-04-07-2013

Sri K. Janan Mohan, EX-MP Detail copy enclosed 15-07-2013

37 Tr.T8/2464/2013,

Dt.-31-07-2013

Ms. Neha Singh,

Rashtriya Kranthikari

Samajvadi Party,

R/o 65/25, Chitavapur

Road,

Luknow,

Uttar Paradesh.

To

The PIO,

Transport Commissnr.,

Khairatabad,

Hyd.

Who are eligible for keeping Red Light

on their vehicles and for violation of

said office what is the rule position and

section of law under which act?

In pursuance of powers under clause (iii) of provision

to rule 108 of the Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989,

the Central Government has, vide Notification

No.52(E), dt.11-01-2002, published in the Gazette of

India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

regarding use of Red Light on top of vehicles being

used by the dignitaries (Gazette copy enclosed) and

under section 313, 314 of Andhra Pradesh Motor

Vehicles Rules 1989, regarding use of Red or White

light and restriction on the use of Blue Light. (Xerox

copy enclosed).

The penal prevision of the offence is Section 177 of

Motor Vehicle Act.

08-08-2013

As per P.C.S/PC.S.J are we eligible for

the use of Blue Light, if not what is the

Challan amount and under which

section of the act ?

Please write the full form of P.C.S/P.C.S.J, as the

question is not clear.

Three separate sheets enclosed.

40

Question is not clear

Yes, it can be printed.

38 Tr.T8/2540/2013,

Dt.-01-08-2013

Sri Choudhar S.R.,

5/85, Sy.No.26,27,

Near Saidabad Mandir,

Parvathapuram,

Meddipally,

Uppal,

RR District – 5000 39.

Is there any rule or order of any

Government Department regarding

entry of a Contract Carriage bus, tourist

vehicle bus, special permit bus in

Hyderabad City during day time for

sightseeing (visiting places like Hussain

Sagar, Public Garden etc) purpose. If

any order or rule please give photo

copy of that ?

The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City is

empowered U/s 21 clauses (1) & (b) of Hyderabad

City Police Act to maintain smooth flow of traffic,

prevent danger and inconvenience to the public.

Which is done through Notification, dt10-04-2008 (

Photo copy enclosed).

05-08-2013

39 Tr.T8/2571/2013,

Dt.-7-08-2013

Sri B. Anbazhagan,

General Secretary,

Maha Nagar Union CITU,

South Chennai – No.11,

Lowyer Jaganathan St.

Gundy,

Chennai – 600 032.

Kindly intimate the timings for entry and

exit of commercial goods carrier, Heavy

vehicles into Hyderabad City ?

Enclosed the copies of the Notification

issued/published by the Commissioner of Police,

Hyderabad City through Printed & Electronic Media

for publicity, dt.10-04-2008, regarding timings and

restrictions along with instructions for entry and exit of

commercial goods carrier, heavy vehicles into

Hyderabad City.

08-08-2013

If there is restriction in entry, exit timings

of commercial goods carrier, heavy

vehicles into Hyderabad City. Please

intimate the relevant rules for restricting

the entry and exit and copy of G.O. ?

Notification was issued under Hyderabad City Police

Act, by the Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City

in order to maintain smooth flow of traffic, prevent

danger and inconvenience to the public and

imposed restrictions. A copy of notification is

enclosed.

41

40. Tr.T8/2674/2013,

Dt.30-07-2013

Sri Raj Shekhar Singh,

Quarter # 1280, Sector I/C,

Bokarao Steel City,

Jharkhand – 827001.

In case of traffic police check if I forget

my driving licence or RC, can I pay the

fined amount on the sport or can I have

a chance to pay the amount later ?

Whenever the Traffic Police check, if you forget the

D.L. or R.C., you can pay the fine amount on the spot

or at traffic compounding booth on the next day,

but the checking officer will detain your vehicle.

After payment fine amount at Traffic Compounding

Booth your vehicle will be released at Police Station.

04-08-2013

Whenever I forget my licence, the

traffic police ask for money without

giving slip. What rights do I have to

demand a Challan or a slip ?

If you forget your licence, the Traffic Police ask for

money without giving slip, you should not give

money without giving slip or challan. You have right

to demand Challan or slip for traffic violation to pay

fine amount.

41 Tr.T8/2640/2013,

Dt.21-08-2013


H.No.6, Bloomfield,

Khajaguda,


Detail is enclosed 11-09-2013

42 Tr.T8/2640/2013,

Dt.14-08-2013


H.No.6, Bloomfield,

Khajaguda,


Detail is enclosed 21-08-2013

43 Tr.T8/2638/2013,

Dt.14-08-2013

Sri B. Venkata Chary,

H.No.3-4-512/72, Flat

No.201,

Balaji Classic Apts.,

Barkatpura,


It is to inform that no such Notification, Prohibitory

orders etc., were found in the available records

relevant to One Way Traffic from Indira Park X Road

towards Domalguda. But on verification with

Inspectors, who have worked at Tr.PS Chikkadpally in

the year 2002 period it came to know that One Way

Traffic from Indira Park X Road towards Domalguda

was in force on 05-06-2002.

07-09-2013

44.

Tr.T8/2771/2013,

Dt.28-08-2013

Sri S.Shanker Goud,

R/o H.No.2-2-498,

Amberpet,

Burju Gally,

Whether any permissions are

required to run the Water Tankers

i.e. Heavy Vehicles and high

uplinks(i.e.) DCM and etc., during

Permissions are required for heavy vehicles and

DCMs irrespective of material being carried on them.

08-09-2013

42

Hyderabad - 13.

the day time for supply of drinking

water to in House Tanks,

Apartments & Hostels in your

Jurisdiction.

If so who is the competent authority to

issue permits.

Addl.Commissioner of Police, Traffic, Hyderabad.

Whether the water tankers through high

vehicles such as DCM”s are being

permitted in your Jurisdiction by your

authority to supply the water to the in

habitants of Apartments and to the

Hostels if so, whether they are carrying

any permits or not.

Only Six applicants have applied for their respective

vehicles and obtained permission during the year

2013 so far.

If they carry permits a copy of the

order or permits granted by the

competent authority may please be

furnished.

Enclosed.

No. of Water Tankers seized from 1-1-

2013 to 23-08-2013 on the ground that

the vehicles do not have valid

permissions to ply over during day time

in your Jurisdiction for supply of drinking

water through tankers.

There is no specific code available for the Water

tankers in the existing software. As such cases

booked on water tankers is not being maintained in

our data base. However cases booked on Lorries

and DCMs irrespective of material carried on them

in the limits of Tr.P.S. Malakpet w.e.f. 1-1-2013 to 23-8-

2013 are as follows

Cases booked on Lorries- 284

Cases booked on DCMs -2691

45 Tr.T8/2704/2013,

Dt.03-09-2013

Sri Syed Kaiser Naqv,

Social Activist,

H.No.16-9-736,

Old Malakept,


Requested for copy of G.O.Ms No. 108

of 2011 and which is cause of enhance

fine amount upto Rs. 1000/- for some

violation of Traffic Rules and also any

Central Motor Vehicle Acts.

Hyderabad Traffic Police is having powers of

enforcement on Traffic Violators and Traffic

regulation only. Above G.O. has been issued by the

Transport, Road and Building (TR-1) Department of

Andhra Pradesh Government. Copy of the G.O.Ms

No. 108 is enclosed herewith.

03-09-2013

Amendments clause above validity and

legality of using Hand Cameras and

CCTV Cameras installed on Traffic

As per the Section 206 of M.V. Act, Traffic Police

Officer is empowered to do enforcement on Traffic

Violations. In the G.O.Ms No. 108 it is clearly

43

Signals.

mentioned that, not below the rank of Sub-Inspector

of Police (Traffic) can do enforcement on certain

Traffic Violations, which is implemented in latter and

spirits.

The cameras are used to collect evidence to

substantiate the offence which are produced if

agitated by the violation at any forum.

46 Tr.T8/2836/2013,

Dt.02 -09-2013

Sri G. Harikishan Goud,

Society for Social

Awareness,

Office 4-1-663/A, Krishna

Hospital,

Jambagh X Road,

Near Mouzamjahi Market,

Hyderabad 500 195.

We appreciate the efforts taken by

Commissioner Police for the controlling

the traffic in Hyderabad.

Thanks 25-09-2013

Have your department identified the

parking place near the ban of parking

area. What Plans of your office to

inform the people about the parking

place available with boards or in online

in mobile give the brief near by No

Parking.

“ No parking” boards have been installed at various

parts of city in consultation with GHMC, and

information about parking places is available on our

website.

Have your office as interacted with

GHMC/ to provide number concisions

for the people who want to construct

buildings. So that this will encourage

the private parties to construct the

parking building. If your office as

represented to GHMC please send the

copies of it.

No

Majority traffic lights on small height it is New signals under HTRIM Project have been installed

44

difficult if driver is behind the buss

visualize before crossing what

arrangement have done to this matter

by your office.

after joint inspection by GHMC, Hyderabad Traffic

Police, Bharat Electronic Limited and Project

management unit, wherein all technical issues were

taken into consideration.

47. Tr.T8/3144/2013,

Dt.23 -09-2013


R/o My Kidz 123 Beside


1st floor, Surya Towers,

M.G.Road Suryapet


Furnish information with regard to

implementation of Section 4.1(a) & (b)

RTI Act 2005 in Traffic Police Station of

Hyderabad and Cyberabad? Furnish

the website address of the information?

In Hyderabad Traffic Police: Addl. Commissioner of

Police, Traffic Branch is Appellate Authority under RTI

Act, Dy. Commissioner of Police, Traffic-II, is PIO under

RTI Act and Asst. Commissioner of Police, Traffic-VII is

APIO under RTI Act., O/o Traffic Complex/Branch,

Opp: Assembly, Hyderabad.

As per Memo dated 05.10.2013 Commissioner of

Police, Hyderabad City, Public Information Officer is

the Station House Office/Inspector of Police, under

Section 5(2) of RTI Act (2005) and Asst. Public

Information Officer is the Station Writer under Section

5(2) of RTI Act (2005). The website addressed is

www.htp.gov.in

Implementation of Section 4.1(a) & (b) RTI Act 2005 in

Traffic Police Station of Cyberabad. The above

information may be obtain from the CP.,

Cyberabad.

15-10-2013

Before imposing the penalty of Rs.

1000/- for No-parking and Signal Jump

cases. What are the steps taken by

Hyderabad and Cyberabad Traffic and

Police? Furnish the meeting and note

file details?

Before implementing the penalty of Rs. 1000/- for No-

Parking, the Addl. Commissioner of Police had held a

meeting with DCP, Addl. Dy. C.P, all Zonal ACPs an

all Tr. Inspectors of Hyderabad City. After taking the

opinion of all officers it was decided to implement

the order of Government issued vide G.O.Ms.No. 108

in true spirit.

It is the decision taken by the Government as per

G.O Ms.No. 108. The same is implemented by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police after giving wide publicity in

the Electronic and Print media. Further banners and

flexes were kept at all Junctions and conspicuous

places, and Pamphlets were also distributed to

45

vehicle commuters at all junctions in the city.

Implementation in Cyberabad limits, the above

information may be obtain from the CP.,

Cyberabad.

What are the reasons behind the

implementation of penalty of Rs.1000/-.

Whether it is informed to public about

the enhancement of penalty of Rs.

1000/-. If so furnish complete

information in this regards?

It is the decision taken by the Government as per

G.O Ms.No. 108. The same is implemented by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police after giving wide publicity in

the Electronic and Print media. Further banners and

flexes were kept at all Junctions and conspicuous

places, and Pamphlets were also distributed to

vehicle commuters at all junctions in the city.

On 26.06.2013, V. Anand Ramu,

addressed a letter to DCP traffic with

regard to action taken in this matter?

Give the detail information with date?

Reply to the letter of Sri. V. Anand Ramu was

submitted to the DCP Traffic vide reference No.

293/OW/Tr/PS-SFB/2013, Dated: 26.07.2013. Action

taken in this regard may be furnished by Traffic

Branch. (copy enclosed).

Furnish the Designation, Name of the

person who signed on challan receipt

No. 204090 Dated 26.11.2012.

On 26.11.2012, the signature is of Sri. J. Madan

Mohan Reddy, Addl. Inspector of Police, holding

charge of Inspector of Tr.P.S.Saifabad, Hyderabad.

Details of deployment, designation

dated: 26.11.2012 of staff of

Tr.P.S.Saifabad, duly attested with

stamp?

Enclosed the attested copy of staff on duty and their

details on 26.11.2013 as sought in the application.

Whether one officer can book a case in

place of another officer, who is not on

duty? If so, under which provision he

can book a case?

Cases cannot be booked by an officer on behalf of

another. It is to clarify that on 26.11.2013 Sri. T.

Sudhakar, Inspector of Tr.P.S.Saifabad met with an

accident and reported sick. The Additional Inspector

working in the same police station was holding the

charge of Station House Officer. Thus Sri. J. Madan

Mohan Reddy was on duty and booked the case. He

has performed his legitimate duty and not booked

case on behalf of other.

48. Tr.T8/3214/2013,

Dt. -10-2013

Sri S. Ramakrishna,

H.No.1-11-212/3,

The following car Owners bearing

Car Numbers AP 09 CG 4651 and

On your complaint SHO Begumpet deputed SI-I, Sri.

Syed Sardar Ali, to the mentioned place he noticed

29-10-2013

46

Annapurna’s Prabhath

Kusum Complex,

Street No.4, Lane No.2,

Gurumurthy Lane,

Begumpet,


AP 10 AU 6361 are parking their Cars

UNAUTHORIZEDLY INFRONT OF OUR

COMPLEX AND BY THE SIDE OF OUR

COMLEX. The Owners of the

vehicles are not having own parking

facilities in their respective

compound areas. It is very

inconvenient to our complex Fat

Owners to move the vehicles while

going out. What is the action taken

by our Traffic Police Authorities on

those vehicles.

a car bearing. No. AP09 CG4651 parked in the said

area. As such he booked a case U/S 122/177 and

imposed fine amount of Rs.200/- and removed the

car and further instructed the owner not to park

causing inconvenience to others and the other car

bearing. No. AP 0 AU6361 is not available in the said

lane.

49. Tr.T8/3203/2013,

Dt.30 -09-2013

Sri K. Ranjith Kumar,

In house Investigator-Bajaj

Allianz GIC Ltd.,

R/o Office at 4th floor,

North East Plaza,

Erramanzil Circle, beside

BMW Showroom,

Opp: Khairthabad,

Hyderabad.

Number of CCTV’s in cities, National

Highway and State Highways installed

so far under entre jurisdiction of Andhra

Pradesh State & Andhra Pradesh Police

Department?

In Hyderabad City-total Cameras in National & State

Highways i.e., 110.

The locations where in CCTV’s as stated

above are installed.

List enclosed.

The time period of preserving the CCTV

footages.

The time period of preserving the CCTV footages is

30 days.

Authority/Authorities under whose

jurisdiction installation maintenance of

CCTV in cities, National Highways, state

Highways as states in the entire

jurisdiction of Andhra Pradesh State &

Andhra Pradesh Police Department ?

The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City is

authorized officer and final authority of Hyderabad

City Police.

47

Please provide copy of the manual

standing instructions, if any, pertains to

installation, maintenance of CCTVs as

stated above.

There are certain standing instruction such that entire

cameras will be monitored by 24 X 7 with 3 sections

stall. These cameras are using for Traffic

Management, as well as law & order purpose. These

cameras are installed at Sensitive areas, for crime

point view and other important location. There is no

specific manual for installation. Entire cameras

locations list in enclosed herewith.

18-10-2013

50. Tr.T8/3216/2013,

Dt. -10-2013

Sri S. Ramakrishna,

H.No.1-11-212/3,

Annapurna’s Prabhath

Kusum Complex,

Street No.4, Lane No.2,

Gurumurthy Lane,

Begumpet,


In our Hyderabad City there are more

that Two Lakhs Cars and 3 Lakhs

Scooters (approximately) parking during

day and Night timings(without any

danger light On while they are parking

during Night Timings) in the colonies.

The owners of the vehicle are not

having Own Parking facilities in their

respective compound areas. It is very

inconvenient to people. What is the

action taken by our Traffic Police

Authorities on those vehicles. Please

give me necessary information on right

information Act-2005

Generally Hyderabad Traffic Police concentrate on

Main Roads only to ensure free flow of Traffic.

However we take action inside the colonies on

specific complaint.

10-10-2013

51. Tr.T8/3224/2013,

Dt.01 -10-2013

Sri Ashish Kumar,

R/o 7-8-219/2, Gautam

Nagar,

Ferozguda,

PO-Bowenpally,

Secunderabad – 5000 11.

a) What are the documents we need to carry while driving a

bike or a Car.

Driving License, Registration Certificate, PUC

Certificate, Certificate of Insurance.

18-10-2013

b) What if, I don’t have a particular document, the moment a traffic

policeman ask me to produce,

but I have that at my home? Will

I get time to produce it

afterward? If not, how much will

You have to carry while driving. For producing

documents latter fine will be Rs.100 to 200/-

48

be the fine?.

c) Is it necessary to produce Original Driving Licence and

Registration Certificate of the

vehicle? Can I produce

laminated coloured Xerox of

driving licence and registration

certificate which exactly looks

like the original one?

The M. V Act does not mentioned about carrying

laminated colour Xerox.

d) Can I refuse to pay the fine at the spot and pay the fine online,

if I don’t have money at that

moment? Will my vehicle be

seized until I pay the fine.

For spot challan it must be paid then and there.

Whereas for e-challan it can be paid online.

For not paying spot challan at the spot Original

documents Will be temporarily detailed.

e) Among the traffic policemen, who all are supposed to check

the documents and who can

impose the fine for not carrying

the documents (please mention

the rank who are supposed to)?

Sub-Inspector of Police,(Traffic)

and above.

f) Can an off-duty traffic

Policeman or a normal

Policeman(other than traffic

Policeman) check the

documents and impose fine?

How can one identify an on-

duty traffic policeman

As per G.O.Ms.No.108 dated: 18-8-2011 it

is specified that the officers of The Transport

department not below the rank of Assistant Motor

Vehicles Inspectors to compound offences under

Section 177,178,179,180,181,182(1),182(2),

183,184,186,189,190(2),192(1), 194(2), 196 and 198 of

M.V.Act 1988, and officers of the Police Department

in uniform not below the rank of Inspector of Police,

and also Sub-Inspectors of Police(Traffic) wherever

separate traffic Police Stations exist in Municipal

Corporations(Metropolis) and Municipalities and the

Inspectors of Police in other places to compound the

49

offences under sections177,178,179, 180,181,182(1),

183,184,186,189, 190(2), 192(1), 194(2), 196 and 198 of

M.V. Act 1988, and officers of the Police Department

not below the rank of the Sub-Inspectors to

compound the visible offences.

g) Why the helmet rule is not compulsorily implemented in

Hyderabad and Secunderabad

like other cities?

It is the social responsibility and has to come from

civilians.

52. Tr.T8/3434/2013,

Dt.30-10-2013

Sri M.A. Haroon Amjad,

Advocate,

R/o Flat No.201, Maa

Gayatri Plaza,

Barkatpura, Hyderabad.

Q.1. What is the primary duty of the

Traffic Police while on

discharging his duties on the

roads?

Ans: To ensure free flow of traffic.

Q.2 What is the purpose of

collecting challan?

Ans:- a) for implementation of Traffic Rules.

b) to maintain road discipline.

c) avoiding accidents.

Q.3 How much amount collected

through challan between the

years 2000 to till date in

Hyderabad and Cyberabad?

Please furnish the details year

wise.

Ans: As per the available data a separate sheet is

enclosed from the year 2004 onwards.

Q.4 a) On what basis parking area is

decided and what are the

circumstances you considering

while deciding parking area.

Ans: Pertains to GHMC department. As per the

norms prescribed by the GHMC during the time of

issuing license.

b) Are the commercial shops

permitted to run without parking

place in a traffic area.

Ans: Pertains to GHMC department.

50

c) If not, what action you have

taken against those shop

keepers?

Ans: Enforcement work will be done if the vehicles

are parked in No Parking area.

5. Is creating pollution is a crime

or not having the pollution

certificate?

Ans: Both are Traffic violations.

Q.5 a) How much visibility is

prescribed for the car window

glass in the GO/Act?

The Hon’ble Supreme court of India in Writ petition

No. 265/2011 has banned the pasting of the black

films or any other material on the front and rear wind

screens and side glasses of all vehicles in the

country. Under Rule 100 of Central Motor Vehicle

rules 1989 the manufacturers of the vehicle may

manufacture the vehicle with tinted glasses which

have visual light transmission of 70 % (VLT) rear and

front and side glasses 50 % VLT.

b) Please furnish copy of the

GO/Act, issued Reg. the car

window visibility.

Ans: Section 100 of CMVR (enclosed)

c) Is having tint on the car

window glasses is the crime or

the having tint more than the

prescribed visibility as the

GO/Act?

Ans: Tint must be in built the glass as per the

specification mentioned above but not by pasting

film on the glass.

d) How can you decide window

visibility, do you have special

equipments and specialized

technicians.

Ans: Yes, by tint meter.

51

e) Do you authorized to decide

the percentage of the car

window tint without any

equipment

with naked eye?

Ans: No.

f) If yes please furnish the

GO/Act?

Ans: Not applicable.

Q.6

a) Is digging roads creates traffic

problems or not ?

Ans: Yes

b) Before digging the roads,

concerned persons use to take

permissions? And if permission

granted is it for limited time or

till they complete the work as

per their convenience.

Ans: The concerned persons use to take permission

for digging the road. The sanctioning

authority will grant permission with condition to

complete the work in specific time and

period in view of free flow of traffic and to

avoid obstructions.

c) If there is time limit, and they

didn’t finish the work in time,

then what action do you have

take against them?

Ans: Permission will be cancelled and will be dealt as

per merits.

d) Did you take any action

against this kind of delay in

diggings, please give

information?

Ans: No.

Q.7

a) How many accidents occurred

due to hit by road dividers?

Ans: Pertains to Law & Order

52

b) How many died and how

many injured due to hit by

dividers since 1995 to till date in

Andhra Pradesh. Please furnish

the details year wise.

Ans: Pertains to Law & Order

Q.8

a) Are manholes, and path holes

also a reason for accidents and

traffic jams?

Ans: Yes.

b) If due to manholes, and path

holes accidents happen then

whom will you make

responsible?

Ans: As investigation of accident cases are done by

Law and Order personnel, information can

be obtained from them.

c) What action did you take

against the persons who are

responsible for bad roads?

Ans: Do above.

Q.9 What is the purpose of

conducting checking of two

wheelers and four wheelers?

How many

times u use to check in a day,

same person?

Ans: For prevention of crime and for want of

documents, during suspicious circumstance random

check will be conducted. There is no limit for

checking of any individual at any place.

Q.10 If you are adopting the foreign

kind of traffic rules, then are you

providing that much of

quality traffic services and

roads to the citizens of the

INDIA?

Ans: From traffic point of view we are providing

services through website, face book, and VMS

Boards and ensuring free flow of traffic. Whereas

roads are subject matter of GHMC.

27-11-2013.

53

53 Tr.T8/3487/2013,

Dt.30-10-2013

Sri N. Krishna Yadav,

C/o Sri M. Madana Chari,

Srimanarayana Colony,

LIC Office 5th Street,

Kodhada Mandali,

Nalgonda District

E-Challan Offence codes description

and their fine amount details.

e-Challans for (41) Traffic Violations list is enclosed

along with fine amount details.

Whether G.O. 108 is using in the e-

Challan System and when G.O.

implementation is started.

G.O. Ms.No.108 of Transport Roads and Buildings

Department, dt.18-08-2011 is being implemented

from 12-08-2013 onwards in the e-Challan System.

Sorted information is requested in

Telugu language.

e-Challan System Traffic Violations along with fine

amount list is enclosed herewith.

54 Tr.T8/3868/2013,

Dt.10-12-2013

The Addl.DGP., Road

Safety, AP., Hyd.

Information called for It is to inform that there are (71) Breath Analysers

instead of (70) and total test conducted are (10910)

instead of (5643) (.)

16-12-2013

55 Tr.T8/39472013,

Dt.17-12-2013





M.G.Road Suryapet


Requested to attest with seal and sign

of every page as per RTI Act-2005

In this regard the attested with seal and sign of every

page.

21-12-2013

54

STATEMENT SHOWING THE LIST OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY, R.T.I. ACT. FROM JANUARY TO 30th SEPTEMBER-2013

Sl.

No

FILE NO. & DATE &

HO MEMO NO.

NAME OF THE APPLICANT &

ADDRESSED

QUESTION ANSWAR DEATE OF REPLY

SENT TO

APPLICANT

2 Tr.T8/4673/2013,

Dt.11-02-2013.

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.



non-appearance / non availability of

the camera details (Make: Sony, Model

:DSC-W210, Year:2008) in the image

properties provided by the Hyderabad

Police vide letter No.Tr.T8/3269/2012,

dt.09-12-12 by the Addl.CP., Traffic,

Hyderabad, connected to the traffic

offence of jumping signal on 25-08-12 at

time 16:24 at Sangeeth X Road under




AP09CK-1728, AP10AQ-6270, whereas

the camera details was deemed to be


Police, since 25-08-12 at time 16:24.

With reference to your question of your letter, dt.09-

11-2012, we have provide the information as follows:-

Q.No.1. A detailed report / explanation containing

cogent reasons for the date and time stamp not

being embedded in the photo.


Cameras for capturing the traffic violations on the

field which don’t have features embedded and





red light signal.

You did not requested the camera make,

26-02-2013

model and manufactured year at that time.

Moreover you have requested on 27-12-2012 for the

camera make, model and year, subsequently we

have provided the same on 24-01-2013. However, a

copy of the same is enclosed.

55

It is certified that, no software’s or tools are used to

tamper or alter the image properties of the violation

photo which was provided to you.



non-availability of / for not providing

independent corroborative materials as

requested in para 6 of the RTI

application, dt.27-12-12 filed by the

undersigned, except a bald statement

by the Public Information Officer, for

answer to Q. No.6, in the letter

dated:24-01-13, that photograph taken

on 25-08-2012 at 16:24 hours is genuine

and the image properties in the said

camera cannot be altered, without

providing independent corroborative

materials or records justifying the same.

The Hyderabad Traffic Police clearly provided the

information on 24-01-2013 on your question

(6) of your letter, dt.27-12-2012.

We have already informed that, no software’s or

tools are used to tamper or alter the image

properties of the violation photograph. It is an official

arthritic information was provided and certified that

violation photograph is genuine and not have been

manipulated or alteration in the photograph. It is was

already justified in information provided earlier.

If no information / record(s) is / are

available for some / all / part of the

paras in this application, then the

copies of the records containing the


for the same.

Already clarified in paras 1 to 2.





Inspector, e-Challan.

56

2 Tr.T8/1097/2013,

Dt.15-03-2013.

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636005,

Tamilnadu.


vide Ref.(1) is solely connected to the

non-appearance of/non-availability of

the camera

details(Make:Sony,Model:DSC-W210,

Year:2008) in the image properties

provided vide Ref.(3).

In your letter of dt.19.11.2012 para-1 question the PIO

have provided the exact information as you have

requested in your question. There is no deviation

either misleading not unrelated reply to your sort of

information.


vide Ref.(1), is solely connected to the

information stored in the image

properties of the image file.

The violation Date and Time information has been

recorded in the image properties and the same was

requested by you on your letter dt.09.11.2012 and

provided the same on dt.09.12.2012.

Even if the said digital camera does not

have tha ability to embed the date and

time stamp on the image captured for

traffic violation (as claimed by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police), still, the

camera details as well as the date and

time stamp are always stored in the

image properties of the concerned

image file and is available for those

who has access to the same.

The violation photos will be kept with Traffic Police

only. Whenever the violator requested for violation

photo we will provided to them. In your case also,

firstly you have requested for violation photo which

was provided to you.

All the relevant information connected

to the image file are stored in the

image properties of that image file and

such information so stored in the image

file are no way connected to/nor

influenced by the ability/inability of the

camera to embed the date and time

stamp in the image captured

connected to the traffic violation.

It is already informed that, date and time stamp is

embedded in the image properties of violation

photo and same was provided to you.

57

The information requested in para.I vide

Ref.(1) is not connected to the

embedding and imprinting of the date,

time stamp on the violation image by

the digital camera used by the

Hyderabad Traffic Police.

In your Lr.dt.09.11.2012, you have requested for

Q. A detailed report / explaining containing, cogent

reasons for the date and time stamp not being

embedded in the photo? Information was proved as


Camera for capturing the traffic violations on the

field which don’t have featured embedded and



properties and it is a permanent record. It is clear


red light signal

On 09.11.2012 no issue was raised and need

not mentioned of non availability/ availability of

camera details at time of violation photo taken with

the digital camera. On 25.08.2012 at 16.24 hrs.

On 27.12.2012, you have requested camera

make, model and specification details subsequently

details are provided on 24.01.2013.

The information requested in Para.1,

Vide Ref.(1) is not connected to the

ability/inability of the digital camera

used by the Traffic Police either to

embed the date and time stamp on

the image connected to traffic

violation.


58

The reply provided by the Public

Information officer vide Reg.(2) being

related to the lack of features of the

Sony Digital Camera to embed the

date, time stamp in the violation photo,

is in no way related to the specific

information requested in para.1 vide

Reg.(1).


3 Tr.T8/2047/2013,

Dt.-13-06-2013

Sri T. Sampath,

D.No.7/4, C-33,



– 636006,

Tamilnadu.

Question - 1: A detailed report /

explanation with cogent reasons for the

delay / non – availability of the image

properties of the photo vide Refs. [1,2]

for a gap of nearly 3 months and 14

days and was provided the same was



2012 at time 16:24 and was not

provided with the letter no.

TrT8/3269/RTIAct/2012 Dated: 22-09-

2012, wherein only the photo without

image properties was provided to

another RTI applicant.

Answer: There was no delay or non availability of the

image of violation recorded on 25-08-2012 at time

16:24 hrs. which was provided to the above

complainant on 09-12-2013 vie Lr. No. TrT8/3269/2012.

A complainant by name Sri. T. Prasanna

Rajan has requested for the violation photograph

vide his letter dt. 08-09-2012 the same was provided

to him vide this Officer Lr. No. TrT8/3269/RTIAct/2012,

dt. 22-09-2012

Further it is to inform that, above complainant

submitted a complaint under RTI Act on 24-09-2012

and received by Office on 25-09-2012. For this

complainant, information was provided vide this

Office Lr. No. TrT8/3407/2012, dt. 24-10-2012 (Copy

enclosed). As per the above complainant request on

09-11-2012, violation photograph along with image

29-06-2013

59

properties was provided vide this Office Lr. No.

TrT8/3269/2012, dt. 09-12-2012

Further it is informed that, violation

photograph was provided to Sri. Prasanna Rajan on

22-09-2012 and same violation photograph along

with image properties was provided to above

complainant Sri. T. Sampath on 09-12-2012, both are

the same photographs which was taken on 25-08-

2012 at 1624 at Sangeet X Road by the same SONY

Camera. As per above complainant request, we

have taken image properties of the above

photograph and provided to them.

Question – 2: A detailed report /

explaination with cogent reasons with

regard to the other independent

corroborative material(s) – record(s)

relied upon by the Hyderabad Traffic

Police, apart from the photographic

records to undisputably claim that the

photograph provide vide letter no.

TrT8/3269/RTIAct/2012, dt. 22-09-2012

and the image properties provided vide

Answer: Hyderabad Traffic Police provided all

available information within the stipulation of period

to the complainant as he has requested in various

representations. The violation photograph of said

violation was provided to Mr. T. Prasanna Rajan vide

this Office Lr. TrT8/3269/RTIAct/2012, dt. 22-09-2012

and not concerned with above complainant Mr. T.

Sampath. Further, image properties of said violation

has provided to the above complainant Mr. T.

Sampath on 09-12-2012 and mentioned that, it is a

60

letter no. TrT8/3269/2012 from the Addl.

Commissioner of Police, Traffic,

Hyderabad WHICH COULD NOT HAVE

BEEN MANIPULATED WITH and hence

provides indisputable and conclusive

evidence of the traffic offence of

Jumping signal on 25-08-2013 at 1624 at

Sangeet X Road under Goplapuram

Traffic Police Station limits based on

which e-challan were issued to the

owners of the vehicle number AP 11 AJ

1375, AP 09 CK1728 and AP 10 AQ 6270.

Note: Refer to the decision of the

Supreme Court, placed on record in

page no. 2 of his notices with regard to

the admissibility of recorded evidence

in a court of law.

genuine and certified copy of above said violation. It

was clearly informed that, above violation

photograph was neither manipulated not altered for

creating a e-challan and sent to the vehicle owners

of AP 11 AJ 1375, AP 09 CK1728 and AP 10 AQ 6270.

Above complainant has mentioned in his

letters, some of software links are available, which

can be used for alter or manipulate image

properties, etc., these are not concern with this

Department.

Hyderabad Traffic Police is clearly informed

that, we never used above alteration softwares and

these are not at all required for the Department.

Being a Government organization,

Hyderabad Traffic Police never use such type of

manipulating softwares.

Question – 3: If a no cogent

explaination / report is available for

para 1, para 2 then detailed report /

explaination for the official, disciplinary

actions taken on the concerned

officials, staffs for malafidely penalizing

the vehicle owners of AP 11 AJ 1375, AP

Answer: Information already furnished in the above

paras 1 & 2.

61

09 CK1728 and AP 10 AQ 6270 for signal

jumping violation based on the photo

without any date and time stamp

provided vide letter no.

TrT8/3269/RTIAct/2012, Dated 22-09-

2012.

Question – 4: If no reply / report avialble

for some / all / part of the queries in this

notice / if is officially decided not to act

on this notice then a detailed report for

the same, supported by cogent reasons

Answer: Information already furnished in the paras 1,

2 & 3.

statement showing the list of pio., r.t.i. act. from 01 … act.pdf · 3 of the car in oct., 2011...

Documents