state science assessment updates · 2019. 8. 26. · 1. asking questions (for science) and defining...
TRANSCRIPT
WERA Conference November, 2017
State Science Assessment Updates
▪Who is with us today?
Welcome!
▪General e-mail account ▪ [email protected]
▪Dawn Cope — Science Assessment Lead ▪ [email protected]
▪ Amy Viveiros—Science Assessment Specialist ▪ [email protected]
▪ Jessica Cole—Administrative Assistant
▪ [email protected] ▪ Anton Jackson-Director of Assessment Development
Science Assessment Office Staff
Today’s Topics
▪Current Assessments
▪ Assessment Resources
▪WCAS Development ▪NGSS 101 ▪WCAS Design and Features
Current Assessments
Why do we have state assessments?
▪ The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) and state law require that we give a state science assessment once each in elementary, middle, and high school for the purpose of school and district accountability.
▪ The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) continues those same requirements.
Science K-12 Learning Standards
Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11
3-5 band Middle School band High School band
Washington State 2013 K-12 Science Learning Standards Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS)
Washington Comprehensive Assessment of Science (WCAS)
▪ Providing flexibility in high school graduation requirements and supporting student success during the transition to a federal Every Student Succeeds Act-compliant accountability system ▪ Revises high school graduation assessment requirements in science,
english language arts, mathematics, and provisions governing alternative assessment options
▪ Discontinues the Collection of Evidence alternative assessment options ▪ Establishes an appeals process for waiving requirements for Certificates
of Academic Achievement or Certificates of Individual Achievement for certain students (ELA and Math only)
▪ Addresses student interventions and academic supports ▪ Establishes new provisions for High School and Beyond plans. Revises
or repeals certain accountability-related duties of the State Board of Education
House Bill 2224
▪Delays the high school graduation requirement until the class of 2021
▪Biology EOC is discontinued
▪Graduation alternatives ▪Biology Collection of Evidence is discontinued
▪Other graduation alternatives are delayed until the class of 2021 ▪ACT science score ▪AP, IB test scores ▪GPA Comparison
▪New graduation alternatives for the class of 2021? ▪ Locally Administered Assessment
For High School Science…
The MSPs and the Biology EOC will no longer be administered.
Grade in 17-18
Class of…Science Assessment 2017-2018
Science Assessment 2018-2019 and beyond
12 2018 N/A N/A
11 2019WCAS for accountability
N/A
10 2020 N/AWCAS for accountability in 11th grade (2019)
9 2021 N/AWCAS for accountability in 11th grade (2020) and graduation
High School Science Assessment 2018+
Required for federal and state accountability
2018 Science Test Windows
Assessment Resources
Science Assessment Webpage
Science Assessment Webpage
Test and Item Specifications• Describe how item clusters (stimuli and items) and standalone items for the WCAS are developed
to assess the NGSS • Contents
▫ Structure of the test ▫ Item Types ▫ Test organization ▫ Overview of NGSS ▫ Item specifications that Describe how students can demonstrate understanding of the PEs on the state test.
• The initial test and item specifications documents will be released in December: ▫ Grade 5 Front matter + 6 G5 PEs ▫ Grade 8 Front matter + 6 G8 PEs ▫ Grade 11 Front matter + 6 G11 PEs
• The PEs will be distributed across domains and grade bands for each grade level.
• An additional 55-60 individual PE item specifications will be released later this school year, distributed across grade levels and domains.
• The remainder of the PEs will be released in school year 2018-2019.
• The Item Specifications will be updated annually based on WA educator feedback.
• Future item specifications drafts will include modification logs that will be updated at each subsequent publication, based on input from Washington educators.
Science Training Tests
• Help students become familiar with the features and tools of online tests. • Available on the WCAP portal in December 2017. • Grades 5, 8, and high school ▫ One cluster (stimuli and items) and one standalone
item at each grade ▫ All three training tests should be used at each grade
level to experience most online item types • Classroom instruction should align to the Washington
State K–12 Science Learning Standards (NGSS) , not the WCAS.
Formative Assessment Resources• Formative assessment resources are available that can help you and
your students measure progress toward learning the Science K-12 Learning Standards as assessed on the WCAS • STEM Teaching Tools website ▫ Includes tools that can help teach science, technology, engineering and math
(STEM) and is currently focused on supporting the teaching of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Each tool is focused on a specific issue and leverages the best knowledge from research and practice.
• Recommended tools: ▫ Prompts for Integrating Crosscutting Concepts Into Assessment and
Instruction ▫ Integrating Science Practices Into Assessment Tasks ▫ How can formative assessment support culturally responsive argumentation in
a classroom community? ▫ How can assessments be designed to engage students in the range of
science and engineering practices? ▫ Steps to Designing a Three Dimensional Assessment
WCAS Development
Goals for WCAS▪ Design an assessment that reflects how science content
is taught and tested in the classroom. ▪ Use WA educators in assessment development. ▪ Develop high quality item clusters and standalone items
that achieve alignment to the SEPs, DCIs, CCCs represented in a PE or PE bundle. ▪ Design an assessment that allows for valid and reliable
inferences to be drawn from the results.
▪ Design an assessment that ensures the fair and accurate assessment of students in special populations.
Science Assessment Development Cycle
▪ (2) Item Cluster Writing Workgroup: Teams of 2-3 educators write stimuli, items, and rubrics designed to validly measure student understanding of the NGSS.
▪ (4) Content Review Workgroup: Educators review the products of the Item Cluster Writing Workgroup to ensure that every stimulus, item, and rubric is scientifically accurate and gathers appropriate evidence about student skill with the NGSS. At the same time, a separate committee of community members reviews the items and stimuli for any bias and sensitivity issues. Recommendations from the Bias/Sensitivity Review Workgroup are considered by the Content Review Workgroup.
▪ (6) Field Test Rangefinding and Rubric Validation Workgroups: Educators look at a range of student responses to each item and decide how to score each response. This educator workgroup refines scoring rubrics and produces the materials that will be used to score the field test items.
▪ (8) Content Review with Data Workgroup: Educators use item performance data, as well as members’ science content knowledge, to decide whether each item should advance into the item bank.
Educator Work Group Descriptions
Science test scores will be released slightly later than usual in fall 2018 due to Achievement Level Setting.
Event Timing
Item Cluster Writing* Spring 2018
Content Review* Summer 2018
Field Test Range Finding and Rubric Validation* Summer 2018
Content Review with Data* Fall 2018
Achievement Level Descriptor Development* November 2017
Contrasting Groups Study* Early Spring 2018
Alignment Study* Spring 2018
Achievement Level Setting* August 2018*
Upcoming Professional Development Opportunities
▪ Sign up for GovDelivery messages
▪ Go to the Subscribe page for GovDelivery. Enter your email address. On the Subscriptions page, select
Content Areas > Science, then select the grade band(s) for which you would like to receive information.
▪ Check calendar posted at: Professional Development calendar
Stay informed and get involved
NGSS 101
▪Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) ▪NGSS Appendices ▪ The K–12 Framework for Science Education
NGSS Resources
Each Performance Expectation (PE) includes a Science and Engineering Practice, a Disciplinary Core Idea, and a Cross-cutting Concept
Performance Expectations per Grade Band
NGSS Performance Expectation
Science and Engineering Practices Disciplinary Core Ideas
Crosscutting Concepts
1. Asking questions (for science) and defining problems (for engineering)
2. Developing and using models 3. Planning and carrying out
investigations 4. Analyzing and interpreting data 5. Using mathematics and
computational thinking 6. Constructing explanations (for
science) and designing solutions (for engineering)
7. Engaging in argument from evidence
8. Obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
Physical Sciences PS1 Matter and Its Interactions PS2 Motion and Stability: Forces and Interactions PS3 Energy PS4 Waves and Their Applications in Technologies for Information Transfer Life Sciences LS1 From Molecules to Organisms: Structures and Processes LS2 Ecosystems: Interactions, Energy, and Dynamics LS3 Heredity: Inheritance and Variation of Traits LS4 Biological Evolution: Unity and Diversity Earth and Space Sciences ESS1 Earth’s Place in the Universe ESS2 Earth’s Systems ESS3 Earth and Human Activity Engineering, Technology, & Application of Science ETS1 Engineering Design
1. Patterns 2. Cause and effect 3. Scale, proportion, and
quantity 4. Systems and system
models 5. Energy and matter 6. Structure and function 7. Stability and change
Cluster Map
Stimulus Includes data sets, graphs,
tables, descriptive observations, models, and/or descriptions of
investigations that can be interspersed among items to add
information as needed.
Context Idea/setting/background/situation related to the phenomenon that can be further developed into a
stimulus
Phenomenon Observation that needs an
explanation
PE Bundle
WCAS Design and Features
Structure and Test Length▪ Structure
▪ Operational ▪ Grades 5 and 8: 5 Clusters and 6-12 Standalones ▪ High School: 6 Clusters and 6-12 standalones ▪ Counts toward a student’s score
▪ Field test items ▪ Embedded in the online administration ▪ One cluster and/or standalone items ▪ Does not count toward a student score
▪ All items are aligned to 2 or 3 dimensions of a PE
▪ Test Length ▪ Grade 5: 90 minutes ▪ Grade 8: 110 minutes ▪ Grade 11: 120 minutes
▪ Administration ▪ Can be administered in multiple sessions like the Smarter Balanced ELA and Math
assessments ▪ 1 to 3 sessions recommended
ETS PEs assessed but not included here.
Claim Grade 5 Grade 8 Grade 11
Application of Science and Engineering Practice
and Cross-Cutting Concepts in Physical
Sciences
17 Performance Expectations
40 %
~14 pts
19 Performance Expectations
35 %
~14 pts
24 Performance Expectations
36 %
~16 pts
Application of Science and Engineering Practice
and Cross-Cutting Concepts in Life Sciences
12 Performance Expectations
29 %
~10 pts
21 Performance Expectations
38 %
~15 pts
24 Performance Expectations
36 %
~16 pts
Application of Science and Engineering Practice
and Cross-Cutting Concepts in Earth and
Space Sciences
13 Performance Expectations
31 %
~11 pts
15 Performance Expectations
27 %
~11 pts
19 Performance Expectations
28 %
~13 pts
Total Points 35 40 45
WCAS Features▪ All online ▪ For clusters, one or more stimuli on left side of screen,
items on the right side ▪ Item Types: ▪ Selected Response—multiple choice, multiple select ▪ Constructed Response—short answer ▪ Technology enhanced—ex: drag and drop, drop-down choices,
simulations ▪ Multi-part items ▪ Parts labeled with letters A, B, and C. ▪ May have a mix of item types. Parts work together. May ask for evidence
to support answer in previous part of the item.
Sample Screenshot from the WA Smarter Balanced ELA 6-8 Training Test
▪ Collapsing stimuli ▪ First stimulus is hidden when second stimulus is provided. ▪ Both stimuli are available to the student.
▪ Locking items ▪ Student can answer the question only once. ▪ Allows subsequent questions to update with correct information. ▪ An “attention” box warns student that they won’t be able to change their answer.
New WCAS Features
Standalone Items
▪ Allow more PEs to be assessed on a test
▪ Must be 2 or 3 dimensional
▪ Can have multiple parts
▪ Computer scored item types only
▪Ellen Ebert, Director ▪[email protected] ▪Amber McCullough, K-12 Science Specialist
▪[email protected] ▪Rochelle Gandoor-Rood, Program Supervisor Environmental and Sustainability Education ▪[email protected]
Learning and Teaching Science
Thank you!