state board of education school report card 2006-2007 · 2020. 4. 23. · 4 (el) 039-0060 9.1 %...

Kilby Laboratory School611 North Pine Street

Florence,AL 35632(256)765-4303

Report cards are prepared by the Alabama Department of Education. For more information including a glossary of terms, grading scales, and detailed data, visit the SDE Web site Accountability Reporting System at: http://www.alsde.edu/Accountability/preAccountability.asp

David F. Byers Jr., Vice President, District 6Ella B. Bell, District 5

Sandra Ray, District 7

Joseph B. Morton, Superintendent of EducationDr. Mary J. Caylor, District 8

Dr. Ethel H. Hall, Vice President Emerita, District 4

Randy McKinney, President Pro Tem, District 1Gov. Bob Riley, Board President

Stephanie W. Bell, District 3Betty Peters, District 2

State Board of Education Members

Mr. Dan Beavers Sr.Mr. Ralph ThompsonMr. Joe F. Fowler

Mrs. Barbara CorneliusMr. Terry Holden

School Board Members

(EL) 039-0060

State Board of Education School Report Card 2006-2007Kilby Laboratory School

PrincipalDr. Mary B. Maschal

Mr. William ValentineSuperintendent

http://www.alsde.edu/Accountability/preAccountability.asp

GENERAL INFORMATION

2 (EL) 039-0060

GENERAL INFORMATION

3 (EL) 039-0060

Internet access and computer use in schools. A lower number indicates greater student access to technology.

Technology

This is the percent of students that attend school each day.

Average Daily Attendance

Students Eligible for Free or Reduced Price Meals

This is the percent of students that applied for and were approved as

reported on the Fall Attendance Report. It is an indicator of poverty.

Average Daily MembershipThis is the average number of students on attendance rolls during the first 20 days of school after Labor Day.

2005-2006 142.0

2004-2005 141.0

2006-2007 141.0

School Year ADM

GENERAL INFORMATION

4 (EL) 039-0060

9.1 % 81.8 % 9.1 %Due to rounding, totals may not equal 100%

Six Year (Class AA) through Doctorate

Master's Degree (Class A)

Bachelor's Degree (Class B)

Teacher QualificationsThis table shows the percentage of teachers holding each level of certification as issued by the Alabama Department of Education for this school year.

Percentage of all Elementary and Secondary Teachers with Alternative

or Emergency Certification0.0 %

As required by federal law, students must be allowed to transfer to another school if their school is identified as persistently dangerous.

NOIs this a transfer option school?

Drug Related 0 0 0 0Assault 0 0 0 0

Weapon Related 0 0 0 0

Bomb Threat 0 0 0 0

Action Taken

Incident TypeIncidents Reported Suspension Expulsion

Alternative School

The following table shows the types of discipline problems that have occurred and what actions were taken.

Safety & Discipline

29,448.8312.33.02,470.123.50.06,962.790.60.0979.216.00.0

2,642.227.01.01,422.215.01.01,839.222.00.5

49,527.5570.49.0

Support StaffOtherInstruction AssistantNurseAdministratorLibrarianCounselorTeacher

StateSystemSchool

The following full and part time professionals were employed this year.

Staffing

GENERAL INFORMATION

5 (EL) 039-0060

Highly Qualified Teachers

Elementary 97,672 100,084 94.9 97.5 5.1 2.5

Secondary 60,824 59,426 84.2 91.3 15.8 8.7

Total 158,496 159,510 90.8 95.2 9.2 4.8

STATE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

Secondary 720 679 85.4 93.2 14.6 6.8

Total 1,674 2,295 92.1 96.2 7.9 3.8

Elementary 954 1,616 97.1 97.5 2.9 2.5

SYSTEM 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

Elementary 24 28 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

Secondary No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

Total 24 28 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

SCHOOL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

CLASSES Total Classes Percentage Taught By Highly Qualified TeachersPercentage Not Taught By Highly

Qualified Teachers

Elementary 24,219 23,610 93.4 96.6 6.6 3.4

Secondary 15,533 14,862 80.6 87.4 19.4 12.6

Total 39,752 38,472 88.4 93.0 11.6 7.0

STATE 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

Secondary 200 188 82.5 89.9 17.5 10.1

Total 470 465 89.8 93.8 10.2 6.2

Elementary 270 277 95.2 96.4 4.8 3.6

SYSTEM 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

Elementary 6 7 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

Secondary No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data No Data

Total 6 7 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

SCHOOL 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007 2005-2006 2006-2007

TEACHERS Total Teachers Percentage Highly Qualified TeachersPercentage Not Highly Qualified

Teachers

This is the percent of teachers that are teaching and the percent of classes taught in a core subject for which the teacher is highly qualified by the State of Alabama as required by the federal legislation known as No Child Left Behind.

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY

6 (EL) 039-0060

Adequate Yearly Progress Status for 2007-2008Based on School Year 2006-2007 Data

State Accountability in Alabama is based on the federal law known as the "No Child Left Behind" Act (NCLB) of 2001. NCLB uses the term Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) to describe whether a school or system has met its annual accountability goals.

For more detail on the Alabama Accountability System, please reference the Accountability Interpretive Guide which can be found on the SDE Web site:

http://www.alsde.edu

Select the Accountability Reporting option on the home page. Then request the School Year: 2006-2007 Report: 2007 Interpretive Guide for State Accountability.

COMPONENTS OF AYP

Graduation Rate

Percentage of students scoring proficient or higherParticipation Rate

Percentage of students participating in assessmentsAdditional Academic Indicators

Attendance

Annual Goals for Reading and Mathematics

ASSESSMENTS USED IN DETERMINING AYP

Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA)

Reading: Grades 3-8Mathematics: Grades 3-8

Alabama High School Graduation Exam (AHSGE)Reading: Grade 11Mathematics: Grade 11

Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT)

Reading: Grades 3-8 and 11Mathematics: Grades 3-8 and 11

http://www.alsde.edu/Accountability/preAccountability.asp

STATE ACCOUNTABILITY

7 (EL) 039-0060

School Improvement Status: Not in School ImprovementAYP Status: Made AYP

This school met 9 AYP goals out of 9 (100.00%).Based on School Year 2006-2007 Data

American Indian/Alaskan No Data No Data No Data No DataAsian/Pacific Islander ~ N/A ~ N/A

All Students 98 Yes 37.74 YesSpecial Education 92 N/A 33.55 N/A

White 97 Yes 37.16 YesLimited English Proficient No Data No Data No Data No Data

Black ~ N/A ~ N/AHispanic No Data No Data No Data No Data

Free/Reduced Meals ~ N/A ~ N/A

Student Group Percent Participation Goal = 95%

Met Participation Goal

Proficiency Index Goal = 0.00

Met Proficiency Goal

AYP Status:Made AYPMathematics School Improvement Status:Not in School Improvement

Mathematics

American Indian/Alaskan No Data No Data No Data No Data

Black ~ N/A ~ N/A

All Students 99 Yes 23.14 YesSpecial Education 100 N/A 24.42 N/A

Asian/Pacific Islander ~ N/A ~ N/A

Limited English Proficient No Data No Data No Data No DataWhite 99 Yes 23.10 Yes

Hispanic No Data No Data No Data No Data

Free/Reduced Meals ~ N/A ~ N/A

Student Group Percent Participation Goal = 95%

Met Participation Goal

Proficiency Index Goal = 0.00

Met Proficiency Goal

Reading School Improvement Status:Not in School ImprovementAYP Status:Made AYPReading

~ Fewer than 10 students * Small school rule for proficiency (N2) Small school rule for participation (UA) Uniform Averaging (SH) Safe Harbor

(CI) Confidence Interval (IM) Improvement (N/A) Not applicable (for subgroups), fewer than 40 students (2%) Proficiency adjustment made for students with disabilities

All Students 97 98 Yes N/A N/A N/A(IM) Improvement (N/A) Not applicable

AYP Status:Made AYPAdditional Academic Indicators

School Improvement Status:Not in School Improvement

Student Group Attendance Rate Goal = 95%Attendance Rate

Previous YearMet Attendance

AYPGraduation Rate

Goal = 90%Graduation Rate Previous Year

Met Graduation Rate AYP

Adequate Yearly Progress Status for 2007-2008

STUDENT ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

8 (EL) 039-0060

Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** ***

Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 15 100.0 6.7 6.7 46.7 40.0

Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** ***

All Students 24 100.0 0.0 4.2 4.2 91.7 678 99.0 0.7 9.7 29.5 60.0

Special Education *** *** *** *** *** *** 57 89.1 8.8 43.9 31.6 15.8

American Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 269 99.3 1.9 16.4 34.9 46.8

Limited English Proficient N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Migrant N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

White 23 100.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 95.7 654 98.9 0.6 9.6 29.1 60.7

Male *** *** *** *** *** *** 347 98.3 1.2 14.1 33.7 51.0

Female 16 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 331 99.7 0.3 5.1 25.1 69.5

Grade 5 Reading

Female 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 328 97.3 0.0 3.7 26.5 69.8

Male 10 100.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 70.0 333 97.9 0.9 10.8 30.3 58.0

White 19 100.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 89.5 630 97.7 0.5 7.0 27.6 64.9



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 239 94.8 0.4 13.0 39.7 46.9

American Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** ***


All Students 21 100.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 85.7 661 97.6 0.5 7.3 28.4 63.8


Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 21 95.5 0.0 9.5 52.4 38.1


Grade 4 Reading


Black N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 15 100.0 0.0 20.0 46.7 33.3


All Students 18 100.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 665 98.4 0.5 8.0 32.0 59.5



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 284 98.3 1.1 10.9 41.5 46.5



White 18 100.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 77.8 646 98.5 0.5 7.7 31.6 60.2

Male *** *** *** *** *** *** 330 98.5 0.6 10.3 33.9 55.2

Female 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 335 98.2 0.3 5.7 30.1 63.9

Grade 3 Reading

*** Less than 10 students tested * Percentage of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable

Note: Some students took an alternate assessment in lieu of this assessment

The Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test (ARMT) provides an assessment of students' mastery of the content contained in the Alabama Courses of Study. The ARMT was given in grades three through eight.

Alabama Reading and Mathematics Test

SCHOOL SYSTEM

Number Tested

Percent Tested*

Percent Not Meeting Standard

Percent Partially Meeting Standard

Percent Meeting Standard

Percent Exceeding Standard

Number Tested

Percent Tested*





Level I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV


9 (EL) 039-0060




All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 741 98.0 0.8 22.1 41.0 36.0

Special Education N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 76 86.4 7.9 72.4 14.5 5.3


Poverty N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 284 96.9 0.7 32.0 46.1 21.1



White N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 708 97.9 0.8 21.8 41.0 36.4

Male N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 377 97.2 1.3 27.9 41.9 28.9

Female N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 364 98.9 0.3 16.2 40.1 43.4

Grade 8 Reading













Grade 7 Reading

Asian/Pacific Islander *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 32 97.0 3.1 9.4 31.3 56.3

Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 100.0 0.0 9.1 18.2 72.7

All Students 22 95.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 750 98.9 0.4 10.0 18.8 70.8



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 290 99.7 1.0 16.6 27.2 55.2

Limited English Proficient N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *** *** *** *** *** ***


White 18 94.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 705 99.0 0.3 10.1 18.3 71.3

Male 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 397 98.8 0.3 13.6 18.6 67.5

Female 11 91.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 353 99.2 0.6 5.9 19.0 74.5

Grade 6 Reading





SCHOOL SYSTEM

Number Tested

Percent Tested*





Number Tested

Percent Tested*







10 (EL) 039-0060


Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 15 100.0 0.0 13.3 60.0 26.7


All Students 24 100.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 91.7 678 99.0 0.1 11.5 29.8 58.6



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 269 99.3 0.4 18.6 36.4 44.6



White 23 100.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 91.3 654 98.9 0.2 11.2 28.9 59.8

Male *** *** *** *** *** *** 347 98.3 0.3 14.4 29.4 55.9

Female 16 100.0 0.0 0.0 6.3 93.8 331 99.7 0.0 8.5 30.2 61.3

Grade 5 Mathematics

Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 239 94.8 0.8 20.5 34.7 43.9



Female 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 328 97.3 0.0 10.4 31.1 58.5



All Students 20 95.2 0.0 5.0 10.0 85.0 660 97.5 0.6 13.2 27.3 58.9


White 18 94.7 0.0 5.6 11.1 83.3 629 97.5 0.5 12.6 27.0 59.9

Male *** *** *** *** *** *** 332 97.6 1.2 16.0 23.5 59.3

Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 21 95.5 4.8 28.6 28.6 38.1


Grade 4 Mathematics




All Students 18 100.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 666 98.5 1.1 12.9 25.8 60.2



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 284 98.3 1.1 18.7 31.7 48.6



White 18 100.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 83.3 646 98.5 0.8 12.4 25.7 61.1

Male *** *** *** *** *** *** 330 98.5 1.2 12.4 26.4 60.0

Female 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 81.8 336 98.5 0.9 13.4 25.3 60.4

Grade 3 Mathematics





SCHOOL SYSTEM

Number Tested

Percent Tested*





Number Tested

Percent Tested*







11 (EL) 039-0060













Grade 8 Mathematics













Grade 7 Mathematics

Asian/Pacific Islander *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***

Black *** *** *** *** *** *** 32 97.0 0.0 28.1 46.9 25.0

Hispanic N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 11 100.0 0.0 9.1 63.6 27.3

All Students 22 95.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 95.5 750 98.9 0.0 15.9 42.1 42.0



Poverty *** *** *** *** *** *** 290 99.7 0.0 24.8 50.3 24.8



White 18 94.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 94.4 705 99.0 0.0 15.5 41.7 42.8

Male 11 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 397 98.8 0.0 15.6 41.1 43.3

Female 11 91.7 0.0 0.0 9.1 90.9 353 99.2 0.0 16.1 43.3 40.5

Grade 6 Mathematics





SCHOOL SYSTEM

Number Tested

Percent Tested*





Number Tested

Percent Tested*







12 (EL) 039-0060

All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 47 0.7 2.1 17.0 31.9 48.9*** Less than 10 students tested * Percentage of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable

Note: Students in grades three through eight and eleven participated in the mathematics subject-area test of the Alabama Alternate Assessment.

Mathematics

All Students N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 55 0.8 1.8 21.8 34.5 41.8*** Less than 10 students tested * Percentage of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable

Note: Students in grades kindergarten through eight and eleven participated in the reading subject-area test of the Alabama Alternate Assessment.

Reading

SCHOOL SYSTEMLevel I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV

Number Tested

Percernt Tested *





Number Tested

Percent Tested *





Grade 7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 642 95.8 2.2 24.0 60.6 13.2

Grade 5 22 91.7 0.0 0.0 81.8 18.2 645 94.2 1.4 20.9 62.9 14.7

Grade 10 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 621 94.2 1.3 15.9 60.4 22.4*** Less than 10 students tested * Percentage of students enrolled in each group tested N/A = Not Applicable

SCHOOL SYSTEMLevel I Level II Level III Level IV Level I Level II Level III Level IV

Number Tested

Percent Tested *





Number Tested

Percent Tested *





Alabama Direct Assessment of WritingAlabama students in grades 5, 7, and 10 are given the Alabama Direct Assessment of Writing (ADAW) each year to measure their writing skills. This table shows how well students met the performance standard on this test.

Alabama Alternate AssessmentThe Alabama Alternate Assessment (AAA) is designed for students with significant cognitive disabilities whose Individualized Education Program (IEP) team determines that the student will not participate in the regular state assessments.

TAXPAYERS' REPORT - FISCAL YEAR

13 (EL) 039-0060

Total 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Revenue = $69,210,813.26

Total 2005-2006 Fiscal Year Expenditure = $69,353,793.98

Local Capital Projects Revenue $228,849.90Other Local Revenue (includes local taxes) $12,694,857.97

Local School Revenue $4,241,483.97

Total Local Revenue $17,165,191.84

Source of Revenue Amount Local Revenue BreakdownThis table provides a breakdown of local revenues for fiscal year. The revenue from local school projects/activities and the capital projects fund have been itemized to provide a more complete analysis of local fund sources.

2005-2006 $7,271.87 C D D

School Year Amount State SouthEast National

Spending Per StudentThe table below shows the spending per student for this school system. The letter grade compares the system's per student spending to the state, southeast, and nation.

Mills EquivalentThis is the total amount of revenue collected locally for public school purposes, divided by the value of one regular system mill of ad valorem tax. The state average is 31.83 mills equivalent.

35.71 B-

This System Grade

A = Excellent B = Good C = Average D = Poor F = Fail

state board of education school report card 2006-2007 · 2020. 4. 23. · 4 (el) 039-0060 9.1 %...

Documents