state assessment systems: issues and options david t. conley, ph.d. professor university of oregon...
TRANSCRIPT
State Assessment Systems: Issues and Options
David T. Conley, Ph.D.
Professor
University of Oregon
Director
Center for Educational Policy Research
2
Purposes of State Assessments A state assessment can have multiple purposes
School accountability Student accountability (exit requirement) System monitoring and policy decisions Performance feedback to improve teaching College placement or admission
Most state assessments end up addressing multiple purposes
Some end up with confused purposes or no one clear purpose
3
The Power Equation of State Assessments State assessments represent an exercise by the
state of its power over local school systems State constitutions grant states control over subsidiary
governmental units, such as school districts However, long traditions of local control come into conflict
with this exercise of state authority in the educational policy arena
State assessments ultimately become a compromise between achieving state goals and incurring the political costs of exercising state power to intervene into the functioning of local schools
4
What Is Feasible? State assessments should meet the following
criteria: Be manageable by school districts Be consistent with state goals Be taken seriously by educators and students Lead educators and students toward desired
behaviors Be reasonable in cost, technical requirements and
time Meet technical adequacy standards for assessments
5
The Reliability-Validity Tradeoff Generally, assessment is a tradeoff between
reliability and validity The more standardized the assessment, the better
the reliability and the more limited the validity The more directly a reflection of actual classroom
work, the better the validity and the more challenging the reliability
Americans tend to value reliability above all else Other nations favor validity
6
Where Are We in Oregon? Oregon assessment, as originally
designed, is admirable in many respects Contained mix of methods
• Multiple choice, performance tasks, work samples Has long track record Has online component (TESA) Appears to be reasonably well accepted by
schools Meets NCLB requirements
7
Where Are We in Oregon? However, significant differences exist from
elementary to secondary levels Lower scores, less concern with the assessments Some schools take them seriously, others appear
less concerned with flat scores While scores can conceivably be used by
higher ed (via PASS), they do not appear to be used in this fashion by many students
Legislature seems to need a primer on the system each session
8
Considering Options
Note that there are tradeoffs with each option- there is no one best option
Development and implementation costs are high for any new system or substantial modification
Oregon educational system does not seem particularly ripe for innovation or significant change at the moment
9
Defend Current System This is sensible to do for many reasons
The current system aligns well (best?) with state standards
It is institutionalized and runs smoothly More educators appear to be more capable of using
test data for instructional decisions However, it does leave the state exactly where
it is currently, with an assessment that is largely in search of a purpose (beyond meeting NCLB requirements)
10
Revise Current System Augment the test to include items that enable
the test to be used for college readiness feedback and perhaps limited college placement purposes
Attach stakes to current tests so students and schools take them more seriously E.g., compensatory scale composed of GPA and test
scores, with minimum score required to avoid mandatory remediation or some other mild sanction
11
Adopt a National Test Tied to College Admission or Placement
ACT system (Explore, PLAN, ACT) or PSAT/SAT
Will be taken more seriously by students, teachers Allows national comparisons of Oregon students Is relatively efficient to administer Does not necessarily cover state standards as well
as state assessment (this needs to be documented, however)
May lead to more students considering college, based on IL and CO experiences
12
Adopt National Tests
Advanced Placement incentives or subsidy
IB subsidy Work with postsecondary institutions to
use data from these tests to recruit more students, award scholarships and credit, and place students
13
Replace or Augment State Test with End-of-Course Exams Key benchmark courses such as Algebra II,
Biology, 11th grade English Creates a better balance between reliability and
validity Development costs, implementation complexity can
be high Can align highly with state standards Can provide diagnostic feedback to students,
teachers Eventually requires specifying curriculum for tested
courses, something that will be difficult for and alien to the state
14
End-of-Course Exams Can address content knowledge and
essential skills Help limit curriculum inflation and drift Can be made a component of the course
grade Can be combined in a compensatory
fashion with other measures Some efforts are underway nationally to
develop consistent end-of-course exams
15
Develop School-based Assessment System Can be collection of evidence or
extended application-type project Data collected over time or on a one-time
basis, or both Best system for providing diagnostic
feedback to students Can be well aligned with state standards Requires local buy-in and a specific
mechanism to guarantee rater consistency across schools
16
School-based Assessments Senior year review
Student must demonstrate competency in key metacognitive skills such as logical and analytical thinking, problem solving, interpretation, teamwork
This can be done through a variety of means to accommodate college-bound and non college-bound students
No student is denied a diploma, but the information is used to judge schools and provide students with a better assessment of their current ability levels in these key capabilities for future success in college and career
17
School-based Assessments
Collection of evidence Builds upon current work sample requirement Links with PASS Can be incorporated into a senior review Can be used to provide ongoing gauge of
college readiness for students and parents Postsecondary ed can align entry-level
courses with collection performance levels
18
Overall Criteria to Consider Is system’s goal to gauge basic skills or
highest achievement? Is system to inform educators or policy
makers? Will system have any effects,
consequences, or incentives for test-takers and for educators?
Does system achieve or promote key state goals for education?
19
Thinking about a System What are the state’s high school exit standards?
What is it students should know and be able to do upon graduation?
• How close are these to college readiness standards?
What does performance look like at 8th and 10 grade for students who will be ready to meet 12th grade exit standards? How can 8th grade assessments also be “exit”
measures What assessment system generates this
information?
20
Oregon Challenges Balance of state influence-local control
What purposes should local control serve? Lack of articulation mechanisms
Joint boards notwithstanding, state has few ways in which the three sectors work in a coordinated fashion
Funding As always, do more with nothing
No 12th grade exit standards CAM had career-related standards, but no content standards
Weak connections between assessment system and classroom practices or (state) accountability system