star 2010 september 10, 2010. agenda new in 2010 interpreting reports comparing results appendixes...

16
STAR 2010 STAR 2010 September 10, 2010

Upload: janel-mcdonald

Post on 18-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

STAR 2010STAR 2010

September 10, 2010

AgendaAgenda

• New in 2010

• Interpreting reports

• Comparing results

• Appendixes A-G

2

3

What’s New in 2010What’s New in 2010• California Modified Assessment (CMA)

reports– Scale score, performance levels for

• Grades 6–8 English−Language Arts (ELA)• Grades 6–7 mathematics• Grade 8 science

– Percent correct for • ELA grade 9• Life Science, grade 10• Algebra I

Manual (M) 2

4

Results: Reporting ClusterResults: Reporting ClusterCautionsCautions

• Based on small numbers of items; therefore, may not be reliable or generalizable

• NOT equated from year to year

• Should not compare reporting cluster percent correct from year to year

M 8−12;Appendix A

5

Interpreting Reporting Clusters or Interpreting Reporting Clusters or Content Areas Content Areas

in the in the Same YearSame Year• Compare to percent-correct range of

proficient students statewide

M 8−12;Appendix A

6

2010 CST Reporting Clusters: 2010 CST Reporting Clusters: Number of Questions and Number of Questions and Average Percent CorrectAverage Percent Correct

To be finalized with complete data in 2010 Post-Test Guide, after August 16.

M Appendix A

7

ExamplesExamples—Interpreting Reporting —Interpreting Reporting Clusters for the CST for Geometry Clusters for the CST for Geometry M 11

8

Using ResultsUsing Results

• For instructional decisions with other data

• Used in Academic Performance Index (API) calculations: CSTs, CAPA, CMA (only grades 3–8, excluding Algebra I)

• Used in adequate yearly progress (AYP) calculations, ELA and mathematics: – Grades 2–8, CSTs– Grades 3–8, CMA (excluding Algebra I)– Grades 2–8 and 10, CAPA

M 4

9

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDoDo Compare CSTs: Compare CSTs:

Same Grade and Same Content AreaSame Grade and Same Content Area

• Mean scale score – Same content and grade, varying

years• Percent in each performance level

– Same content by grade across years• e.g., 2009 ELA grade 10 with 2010

ELA grade 10

M 13−16

10

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDoDo Compare CSTs: Compare CSTs:

Percent Proficient and AdvancedPercent Proficient and Advanced

• Percentage of students scoring at PROFICIENT and above– For a given grade and subject, e.g., Percent

proficient and above for grade 3 math in 2009 and 2010

– For a given subject and aggregated grades, e.g., Percent proficient and above for grades 2– 6 mathematics in 2009 and 2010

– Across grades and a subject, e.g., Percent proficient and above in all courses and all grades

M 13−16

11

Year-to-Year ComparisonsYear-to-Year ComparisonsDON’TDON’T Compare Compare

• Individual scale scores or statistics based on scale scores for different grades or content areas– Subjects by grade are independently scaled – Different content standards are measured in

different grades• Cohorts across grades• Across tests• CMA grades 6−11, STS grades 5−11 to

previous years• CAPA, CMA grades 3−5, STS grades 2−4 to

years before 2009

M 13−16

12

ExampleExample—Using CST Results to —Using CST Results to Compare Grade Results from Year to Compare Grade Results from Year to

YearYear2009 CST for ELA

2010 CST for ELA

Grade % Prof or Above

% Prof or Above

Difference

Grade 2 31% 35% 4%

Grade 3 33% 33% 0%

Grade 4 29% 31% 2%

Grade 5 34% 32% –2%

Grade 6 31% 32% 1%

All Grades

32% 33% 1%

M 14

13

SummarySummary

• Do’s and Don’ts – Do compare mean scale score, percent

at performance levels within same grade, same content area

– Don’t compare mean scale scores across grades, content area

• Summary and Internet reports• Data CDs• Individual reports

AppendixesAppendixes

• Appendix A: STAR Reporting Clusters• Appendix B: STAR Scale Score Ranges• Appendix C: STAR Conditional Standard Errors

of Measurement (CSEM)• Appendix D: Parent/Guardian or School District

Request for Verification of 2010 Test Score• Appendix E: Request to Correct 2010 STAR

CST/CMA and CAPA Demographic Data• Appendix F: California Reading List Number• Appendix G: Glossary of Statistical Terms

September 201014

15

For more information see:For more information see:• http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/sr/• http://www.star.cde.ca.gov/• http://www.startest.org/ • STAR Technical Assistance Center

– 800-955-2954• CDE Accountability

[email protected] – 916-319-0863

To Contact CDETo Contact CDE

• CDE STAR office: 916-445-8765– English–Language Arts tests, including writing: Jamie

Contreras, [email protected], 916-319-0353– Mathematics tests: Jane Liang, [email protected],

916-322-1854– Science tests: Blessing Mupanduki,

[email protected], 916-319-0969– History–Social Science tests: Nicole Jespersen,

[email protected], 916-319-0364– CAPA, CMA: Don Killmer, [email protected], 916-

319-0350

16