standard no 22 student representation and perspectives€¦ · the other methods (e.g., focus...

of 5

Standard No. 22: Student Representation and Perspectives: The college or school must consider student perspectives and include student representation, where appropriate, on committees, in policy-development bodies, and in assessment and evaluation activities.

1) Documentation and Data:

Use a check to indicate the information provided by the college or school and used to self-assess this standard:

Required Documentation and Data:

A list of committees involving students and the names and professional years of students involved on committees (Appendix 7D)

Required Documentation for On-Site Review:

(None required for this standard)

Data Views and Standardized Tables:

It is optional for the college or school to provide brief comments about each chart or table (see Directions).

AACP Standardized Survey: Student – Questions 60 – 62, 65, 66 (Appendix 22B)

Optional Documentation and Data:

Other documentation or data that provides supporting evidence of compliance with the standard. Examples could include extracts from committee meeting minutes that demonstrate active participation by students.

2) College or School’s Self-Assessment: Use the checklist below to self-assess the program on the requirements of the standard and accompanying guidelines:

S N.I. U

The college or school considers student perspectives and includes student representation, where appropriate, on committees, in policy-development bodies, and in assessment and evaluation activities.

The college or school involves student representatives on appropriate program committees, as well as in accreditation self-studies and strategic planning activities.

The pharmacy students feel their perspectives are heard, respected, and acted upon in a fair and just manner.

A clear process exists for students to follow to raise issues with the college or school administration.

The college or school administration responds to problems and issues of concern to the student body.

3) College or School’s Comments on the Standard: The college or school’s descriptive text and supporting

evidence should specifically address the following. Use a check to indicate that the topic has been adequately addressed. Use the text box provided to describe: areas of the program that are noteworthy, innovative, or exceed the expectation of the standard; the college or school's self-assessment of its issues and its plans for addressing them, with relevant timelines; findings that highlight areas of concern along with actions or recommendations to address them; and additional actions or strategies to further advance the quality of the program. For plans that have already been initiated to address an issue, the college or school should provide evidence that the plan is working. Wherever possible and applicable, survey data should be broken down by demographic and/or branch/campus/pathway groupings, and comments provided on any notable findings.

of 5

The participation and contribution of students on college or school committees

The organization, empowerment, and implementation of a student government association or council

The other methods (e.g., focus groups, meetings with the Dean or other administrators, involvement in self-study activities, review of student complaints) used to gather student perspectives

Examples of quality improvements in the college or school that have been made as a result of student representation and perspectives

How the college or school is applying the guidelines for this standard in order to comply with the intent and expectation of the standard

Any other notable achievements, innovations or quality improvements

Interpretation of the data from the applicable AACP standardized survey questions, especially notable differences from national or peer group norms

Student input regarding curricular issues and other aspects of the professional program are

encouraged in a number of ways, including representation on College committees, personal

meetings with the Associate Dean of Student Affairs & Faculty Development (ADSA&FD),

availability of open forums, course evaluations and participation in student organizations.

Student Representation

The College of Pharmacy, Nursing and Allied Sciences bylaws provide for student representation

on several College standing committees, as well as faculty search committees and the current

accreditation self-study committee. Students serve on the following six standing College

committees:

1. Curriculum

2. Assessment

3. Student Affairs

4. College Awards

5. Planning, Priorities and Resources

6. Dean’s Student Liaison Committee (DLC).

A full list of the College’s committees (with student representation indicated) can be found on the

College’s website: http://www.ndsu.edu/pharmacy/college_information/committees/ and in

Appendix 7D.

The DLC meets on a regular basis with the ADSA&FD and is comprised of elected members from

each professional class and student organizations in the College. The DLC’s purpose is to provide

students with an opportunity to interact directly with College administration, to exchange

information, advise the dean on student organization budget requests and to problem-solve on

of 5

matters of interest and concern to students. The dean and associate deans also host a “Dean’s

Open Forum” at least once each semester to provide all students with the opportunity to voice

issues of concern about any aspects of the program.

The ADSA&FD has an “open door policy” whereby students are actively encouraged to bring

issues to light which can improve participation in program governance. While not every issue can

be comprehensively and completely resolved in a manner desired by the student, the ADSA&FD

nonetheless brings those issues to the College’s administration for discussion and resolution. The

number of issues brought to the ASDA&FD’s attention varies; usually one to two issues are

presented by students each month. The ADSA&FD is usually able to appropriately address the

issue and communicate the resolution to the student within three business days. Occasionally,

issues require more time to resolve. As an example, during the 2010-2011 academic year, budget

cuts resulted in a reduction of hours in which the Sudro Hall library was open and available to

students. The ADSA&FD and the DLC worked to have a portion of the library converted into a

separate study room, which was available to students as long as Sudro Hall was open to the

public. This allowed students greater access to quiet study areas over a larger period of time each

week.

Student Perspectives in Program Evaluation and Development

Student ratings of instruction are obtained each semester in all courses. College faculty members

use a standardized form to conduct evaluations that include an opportunity for students to provide

written input regarding faculty-teaching methods (Appendix 22A). Data from these forms are

computerized, and student comments are compiled separately. A majority of the student

evaluations are collected through an online survey with the help of the campus Group Decision

Center. All feedback is shared privately with the individual faculty members. The faculty members,

in collaboration with the department chair and ASDA, use this feedback to improve teaching.

In 2009, faculty partook in a student-led campus pilot project to implement optional mid-term

course evaluations. The mid-term course evaluation gives students an opportunity to provide mid-

semester feedback, allowing faculty to make changes to their course based on current student

perspectives. Based on the pilot project conducted in the College, mid-term evaluations are now

offered as an optional evaluation campus-wide.

of 5

Currently, eight student organizations are active in the professional pharmacy program:

ASHP

American Pharmacists Association Academy of Students of Pharmacy (APhA/ASP)

The Christian Pharmacists Fellowship International (CPFI)

The National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA)

Phi Lambda Sigma (PLS)

The Rho Chi Society

The Public Health Association

Kappa Psi

Students have opportunities to participate in activities with a variety of foci. Pharmacy students are

also active members in other related organizations, like the Native American Professional Program

(NAPP), the Multicultural Affairs Program (MAP), Mortar Board, Blue Key and Golden Key. Overall,

student organizations, as well as required coursework, provide opportunities for student-to-student

interaction.

4) College or School’s Final Self-Evaluation: Self-assess how well the program is in compliance with the standard by putting a check in the appropriate box :

Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant

No factors exist that compromise current compliance; no factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance.

• No factors exist that compromise current compliance; factors exist that, if not addressed, may compromise future compliance /or

• Factors exist that compromisecurrent compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance; the plan has been fully implemented; sufficient evidence already exists that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into full compliance.

Factors exist that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan exists to address the factors that compromise compliance and it has been initiated; the plan has not been fully implemented and/or there is not yet sufficient evidence that the plan is addressing the factors and will bring the program into compliance.

• Factors exist that compromise current compliance; an appropriate plan to address the factors that compromise compliance does not exist or has not yet been initiated /or

• Adequate information was not provided to assess compliance

Compliant Compliant with Monitoring Partially Compliant Non Compliant

5) Recommended Monitoring: If applicable, briefly describe issues or elements of the standard that may require further monitoring.

NA

of 5

Appendices Appendix 7D: College Committees and Charges Appendix 22A: Student Ratings of Instruction Appendix 22B: AACP Survey Data

COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, NURSING and ALLIED SCIENCES

2011‐2012 STANDING COMMITTEES Approved 9/21/2011

COLLEGE

Promotion/Tenure/Evaluation

(3 year terms, elected by the faculty)

Sanku Mallik (2010‐2012)

David Scott (2010‐2012)

Mary Wright (2010‐2012)

Academic Affairs

Cynthia Naughton (chair)

Daniel Friesner (ex‐officio)

Maggie Mackowick

Norma Kiser‐Larson

Benedict Law

Polly Olson

Wanda Roden

Educational Resources

Liz Frannea

Jeanne Frenzel

Bin Guo

Marilyn Hedberg

Maggie Mackowick

Polly Olson

Chengwen Sun

Interprofessional Education

Carla Gross (co=chair)

Cindy Naughton (co‐chair)

Christian Albano

Amy Fisher

Tina Lundeen

Polly Olson

Angie Walswick

Donald Warne

Amy Werremeyer

College Awards

Kara Falk

Jeanne Frenzel (chair)

Sanku Mallik

Estelle Leclerc

Jana Stenson

Polly Olson

Robert Sylvester

(AS Student)

(N Student)

(PP Student)

Amit Modgil (PS)

One outside faculty‐appointed by Dean

Scholarship Recognition/Awards

Robert Biberdorf (chair)

Christian Albano

Daniel Friesner

Karla Haug

Estelle Leclerc

Polly Olson

Kenton Omvig

Wanda Roden

Yagna Jarajapu

Sara Wald

Becky Focken

Planning, Priorities & Resources

Charles Peterson (chair)

Wendy Brown (2011‐2014)

Dean Gross (2011‐2013)

Lori Askew (2010‐2012)

Benedict Law (2010‐2013)

Polly Olson (2011‐2013)

David Scott (2009‐2012)

Heidi Eukel (2010‐2013)

Chengwen Sun (2011‐2014)

Stefan Vetter (2009‐2012)

Sadie Kraft (N)

Nick O’Rourke (PharmD)

Erin Nyren (PS Grad)

Student Affairs

Daniel Friesner (chair)

Cynthia Naughton (ex‐officio)

Dana Davis

Kara Falk

Alicia Fitz

Benedict Law

Polly Olson

Angie Walswick

Kathy Mok (AS/Pre‐MLS)

Sadie Draft (N)

Hiral Bhatt (P1)

Trung Nguyen (P2)

Ankit Patel (P3)

Gitanjali Sharma (PS Grad)

1 of 7

Cynthia.Naughton

Typewritten Text

Appendix 7D: College Committees and Charges

PHARMACY

Admissions

Daniel Friesner (chair)

Wendy Brown

Thomas Christensen

Mark Dewey

Amy Drummond

Michael Kelsch

Sanku Mallik

Tara Schmitz

Liz Skoy

Ross Wilhelm

Erxi Wu

Assessment

Donald Miller (chair)

Amy Drummond

Daniel Friesner

Sanku Mallik

Cynthia Naughton

Wanda Roden

Dave Scott

Liz Skoy

Jagdish Singh

Stefan Vetter

Sue Nelson

Jingyang Xiao (P1)

Amanda Hoffbeck (P4)

Jessica McClelland (P4)

Curriculum

Cynthia Naughton (chair)

Becky Focken

Jeanne Frenzel

Bin Guo

Mike Kelsch

Donald Miller

Stefan Vetter

Amy Werremeyer

Gayle Ziegler

Kit Wong (P1)

Sarah Clark (P2)

Megan Born (P3)

Breanna Schmidt (P3)

Experiential Education

Wanda Roden (chair)

Wendy Brown

Mark Dewey

Heidi Eukel

Alicia Fitz

Becky Focken

Anne Ottney

Tara Schmitz

Ross Wilhelm

NURSING

Undergraduate

Admissions\Progression

Kara Falk

Donna Grandbois

Karla Haug, (chair)

Loretta Heuer

Becky McDaniel

Mary Wright

Ryan Day (Student)

(Student)

Graduate Council

Kara Falk

Donna Grandbois

Dean Gross

Loretta Heuer

Norma Kiser‐Larson (chair)

Tina Lundeen

Molly Secor‐Turner

Mary Wright

Nancy Nyongesa (Graduate Student)

Graduate Student

Undergraduate Curriculum

Amy Fisher

Carla Gross (ex‐officio)

Karla Haug

Maggie Mackowick (chair)

Becky McDaniel

Jana Stenson

Shila Thompson

Jacob Edland (Student)

(Student)

Assessment and Evaluation

Dean Gross (co‐chair)

Norma Kiser Larson

Tina Lundeen

Maggie Mackowick

Molly Secor‐Turner (co‐chair)

Shila Thompson

Carrie Schmidt (N3)

(Graduate Student)

Resources

Kara Falk

Amy Fisher

Donna Grandbois

Carla Gross (chair)

Dean Gross

Karla Haug

Loretta Heuer

Norma Kiser Larson

Maggie Mackowick

Becky McDaniel

Tina Lundeen

Molly Secor‐Turner

Jana Stenson

Shila Thompson

Mary Wright

Hannah Belk (Student)

(Student)

ALLIED SCIENCES

Allied Sciences Assessment

Polly Olson, Chair

Affiliated Hospital Program

Representatives

Angeline Walswick

Respiratory Care Consortium

Daniel Friesner

Polly Olson

Charles Peterson

Sanford Health Representatives (3)

Respiratory Care Curriculum

Cynthia Naughton

Polly Olson

Sanford Health Representatives (2)

Respiratory Care Advisory

Polly Olson

Senior RC Intern

RC Alumnus

Community Administrative

Representatives

Public Representative

Physician

(10/28/11)

2 of 7

Appendix 7D: Committee Charges

V. College Standing Committees

A. Administrative Council The Administrative Council of the College shall consist of the Dean, who shall be chair, the Associate

Deans of the College, and the Chair or a designee from each of the academic departments within the College. The Administrative Council acting as the leadership team of the College shall be an advisory committee to the Dean on administrative matters affecting the College. The Administrative Council shall periodically review the Bylaws and present any proposed changes to the Faculty.

B. Dean’s Student Liaison Committee The Dean’s Student Liaison Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean for Student Affairs, who

shall be chair, and one student representative from each of the following areas: first year, second year, third year, and fourth year of the pharmacy professional program; first year, second year, and third year of the nursing professional program; two allied sciences professional students; as well as one representative from each college student organization officially registered with the NDSU Student Activities Office. Student representatives from each group will be elected annually by their respective class or student organization. The purpose of the Dean’s Student Liaison Committee is to provide students with an opportunity to interact directly with the Deans Office, to exchange information, to advise the Dean on student organization budget requests, and to problem-solve on matters of interest and concern to students.

C. Scholarship Recognition/Awards Committee The Scholarship Recognition/Awards Committee shall consist of at least one representative from each

of the departments of the College, the Director of Advancement, Associate Dean for Student Affairs, and the Native American Pharmacy Program Coordinator. The Committee shall be responsible for planning the College Annual Student Recognition Program and the presentation of individual awards to students. Under the leadership of the Committee, adhoc committees are formed in the areas of Pharmacy, Nursing, Allied Sciences, and the Native American Pharmacy Program to select their respective recipients by evaluating scholarship applications; implementing the criteria established by the Faculty and donors for individual scholarship awards; and making decisions on the selection of student scholarship recipients. The Committee shall be responsible for working with the Financial Aid Office to ensure that the necessary funds are distributed.

D. Promotion, Tenure, and Evaluation Committees The College Promotion, Tenure, and Evaluation (PTE) Committee shall evaluate faculty candidates of

the College and make recommendations for their promotion and/or tenure in accordance with the guidelines and standards established by the Department, the College, and the Promotion, Tenure and Evaluation Guidelines and Policies of North Dakota State University. The College PTE Committee shall also review and make recommendations to the Faculty concerning the guidelines and standards for promotion and tenure within the College. The College PTE Committee shall consist of at least three (3) faculty members holding tenured appointments in the College with a minimum rank of associate professor. If eligible, each academic department shall have at least one representative on the College PTE Committee. The Dean, Associate Deans, and Department Chairs are not eligible for membership on the College PTE Committee. All College PTE Committee members shall be elected by the College

3 of 7

Faculty by written ballot in an election conducted by the Faculty Secretary prior to September 15th. Each member shall be elected for a term of three (3) years and may be re-elected. The Chair of the College PTE Committee shall be elected annually by the Committee. In the event of a resignation from the Committee, a new election will be held to fill the vacancy on the Committee for the remainder of the unexpired term. Faculty members who are candidates for promotion and/or tenure shall not serve on the College PTE Committee during the period of time in which their candidacy is under consideration.

Each eligible department in the College shall have a Department Promotion, Tenure, and Evaluation (PTE) Committee. The Department PTE Committee shall evaluate faculty candidates of the Department and make recommendations for their promotion and/or tenure in accordance with the guidelines and standards established by the Department, the College, and the Promotion, Tenure and Evaluation Guidelines and Policies of North Dakota State University. The Department PTE Committee shall consist of at least three (3) faculty members holding tenured appointments in the Department with a minimum rank of associate professor. If more than three (3) faculty are eligible, all tenured faculty members in the department shall have membership on the Department PTE Committee. The Dean, Associate Deans, and Department Chairs are not eligible for membership on the Department PTE Committee. If less than three (3) faculty are eligible, the Department shall appoint a sufficient number of tenured faculty from outside the Department to serve on the Department PTE Committee. The Chair of the Department PTE Committee shall be elected annually by the Committee. Faculty members who are candidates for promotion and/or tenure shall not serve on the Department PTE Committee during the period of time in which their candidacy is under consideration.

E. Academic Affairs Committee The Academic Affairs Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, who shall

be chair, and a minimum of four members, including at least one from each academic department. With the assistance of the Dean's office, the responsibilities of this committee are to: 1) recommend curriculum and programmatic changes to the University Academic Affairs Committee on behalf of the College and its academic programs; 2) recommend to the Faculty policies and standards regarding academic performance and student conduct including issues dealing with probation, termination, suspension and readmission within the College; 3) based on policies and standards established by the Faculty, review and recommend action on College or University probation, termination from the College, or suspension from the University; and 4) In conjunction with the Office of Registration and Records, review and act upon requests for waiver and substitution of coursework required by the College.

F. Educational Resources Committee The Educational Resources Committee shall consist of at least one member from each academic

department, one staff member with expertise in technology and the Health Sciences Librarian at the College. The Committee shall approve requests for new acquisitions to the Health Sciences Library and formulate appropriate recommendations to the Main Library on the operation of the Health Sciences Library. The Committee shall serve as a forum for faculty input in, enhancing and sustaining adequate learning resources, and instructional technology to support the mission of the College and its Departments.

4 of 7

G. Planning, Priorities, and Resources Committee The Planning, Priorities, and Resources Committee is charged with development of a strategic plan

and with setting priorities for allocation of resources. Specifically, the committee is responsible for: 1) development and periodic revision of a strategic plan; 2) review of requests from faculty for expenditure of equipment and pharmacy program fee funds in support of teaching, research, and service activities; and 3) recommendation of priorities for space allocation. Requests from faculty shall be solicited each academic year and shall be ranked in terms of priority for purchase or use. Additionally, the committee will consider requests related to unanticipated needs as these needs arise. Priorities established by the committee shall be forwarded to the Dean of the College, who has final decision making authority and accountability for resource allocations of the College. The activities of the committee shall be reported to the Faculty on a regular basis. Funding sources which shall be excluded from committee review are: 1) salary budgets; 2) departmental operating budgets; 3) research grants and contracts; 4) indirect costs; 5) continuing education account funds; and 6) development funds. Membership of the committee shall consist of three non-administrative faculty members from the Department of Pharmacy Practice, three from the Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, one from the Nursing Department, one from the Allied Sciences Department; two student representatives (one professional student and one graduate student), and one staff representative, all of whom shall have voting privileges. Pharmacy representatives shall be elected by their constituent groups to staggered three-year terms. The Nursing, Allied Sciences, and staff representatives shall be elected to two year terms, with replacement on alternate years. The Dean of the College shall serve as chair.

H. College Awards Committee The College Awards Committee shall consist of at least two faculty members and one student from

each department of the College and one faculty member from outside the College. Each department will select their own department faculty representative to serve on the College Awards Committee. Student representatives will be selected by the Dean’s Student Liaison Committee. The faculty representative from outside the College will be appointed by the Dean. Members of the College Awards Committee who are nominated for a college award must recuse themselves from the selection process for that specific award. Members of the College Awards Committee shall elect a chair annually who will be responsible for facilitating the awards selection process for each college award according to the criteria and procedures outlined in the college recognition awards policy. By March 1, the College Awards Committee shall by majority vote make a recommendation to the Dean for selection of each award recipient based on the award’s criteria and the written documentation submitted by candidates. By March 15, the Dean shall make the final decision on all awards given.

I. College Student Affairs Committee The Student Affairs Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean for Student Affairs, who shall be chair, and a minimum of four members, including at least one from each academic department, the Director of Recruitment, and a student member. With assistance from the Dean’s office, the responsibilities of this committee are to: 1) provide oversight of the admissions processes in place within the College; 2) Recommend to the faculty policies and standards for academic advising; 3)Identify recruitment needs for academic programs; 4) provide oversight of and distribution of information for student background checks; 5) Review student complaints; 6) serve as a liaison for equity/diversity efforts within the College; 7) track post-graduate employment; 8)based on the policies and standards established by the faculty, review and recommend action on professional misconduct issues dealing with termination and suspension; and 9)provide an inclusive environment for all students (pre-professional, professional, and graduate).

5 of 7

J. Interprofessional Education Committee The purpose of the Interprofessional Education Committee is to expand, enhance, and sustain interprofessional education opportunities within the curriculums of pharmacy, nursing and allied science disciplines. Members of the Interprofessional Education Committee shall consist of the Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and representation from each discipline as deemed appropriate with at least one faculty member from each academic discipline (pharmacy, nursing, and allied science). The responsibilities of the committee are to: 1) facilitate cross-program interaction; 2) promote curriculum innovations in interprofessional education across all disciplines; 3) assess the impact of interprofessional education; and 4) support faculty development and training efforts in the delivery of interprofessional education.

VI. Pharmacy Program Standing Committees

A. Curriculum Committee The Curriculum Committee shall consist of at least six faculty with two representatives from each of the Departments of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmaceutical Sciences. In addition, one student member each from the first, second, third, and fourth year professional pharmacy classes, one student from the pharmacy graduate program, and one pharmacy practitioner shall be voting members of the Committee. The Curriculum Committee shall function to manage the development, organization, delivery, evaluation, and improvement of the pharmacy program curriculum, including enhancement of teaching and student learning. In addition, the Curriculum Committee shall serve as the central body for the management of orderly and systematic review of curricular structure, content, process, and outcomes, based on assessment data.

Once curricular items have been approved by the pharmacy faculty, the Curriculum Committee shall forward curricular recommendations to the College Academic Affairs Committee who will review and forward recommendations to the University Academic Affairs Committee for their consideration and action.

1. Experiential Education Committee The Experiential Education Committee shall include at least 4 faculty, including the Director(s) of Experiential Programs, and one volunteer preceptor. The committee is a subcommittee of the Curriculum Committee. The functions of this committee are to review and make recommendations on all matters concerning experiential learning to ensure compliance with accreditation standards regarding experiential programs. The Curriculum Committee delegates to the Experiential Education Committee approval of all new rotations for consistency with criteria established by the Faculty. In addition, it shall assist the Director(s) of Experiential Programs with: recruiting additional experiential sites; providing quality assurance of existing rotations through annual review of student evaluations, periodic site visits as needed and other means; recommending evaluation procedures for students in experiential rotations consistent with the Colleges desired educational outcomes; and providing orientation and periodic training for new preceptors in assessing student performance.

6 of 7

B. Admissions Committee The Admissions Committee for the pharmacy professional program shall consist of the Associate Dean for Student Affairs, who shall be chair, and at least one representative from the pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical sciences departments. The Committee shall review and apply the admission requirements and enrollment restrictions adopted by the Faculty in evaluating admission applications and making decisions on admission of students into the Pharmacy Professional Program. In addition, this Committee shall also concern itself with the development and implementation of an effective student recruitment strategy. The Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and its faculty review applications for the graduate program and make recommendations to the Graduate School for admission of graduate students to the program.

C. Assessment Committee The Assessment Committee shall include at least four faculty members (at least one from each pharmacy department), one pharmacy student member and one graduate student or alumnus. The functions of the Assessment Committee are to: a) develop, maintain, and administer an overall plan for evaluation of the pharmacy program including assessment of student learning and curricular outcomes; b) plan and implement studies of program effectiveness with recommendations to the Faculty; and c) submit an annual written report of pharmacy program assessment activities to the University Assessment Committee and respond to any University suggestions for improvements in the program.

7 of 7

This course and instructor evaluation is being done to improve the quality of teaching in the College of Pharmacy. The results will be shared with the course instructor and his/her department chair. Your comments are taken seriously, however, please remember to keep your criticism constructive. Comments that are unnecessarily negative or personal are generally counterproductive to our shared goal of improving instruction.

NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY, NURSING, AND ALLIED SCIENCES

EVALUATION OF PHARMACY INSTRUCTION

DIRECTIONS: Statements describing the above course/instructor are listed below. For each statement please indicate:

Very Good = A Good = B In Between = C Poor = D Very Poor = E

Mandatory Questions 1. The level of your satisfaction with the course. 2. The instructor as a teacher. 3. The ability of the instructor to communicate effectively. 4. The quality of the course. 5. Your understanding of the course. 6. The fairness of procedures for grading this course.

Optional Questions: 7. The objectives of the course were clearly stated. 8. The coursework covered was pertinent to the course objectives. 9. The examinations reflected class objectives and materials. 10. The required work was appropriate for the credit received. 11. The evaluation and grading procedures were clearly explained. Please list ONE outstanding characteristic of this course.

Please list ONE aspect about this course that needs improvement and suggest a strategy for improvement.

12. The instructor demonstrated a command of the subject matter. 13. The instructor presented material at an appropriate intellectual level. 14. The instructor was enthusiastic about the subject matter. 15. The instructor encouraged students’ participation. 16. The instructor answered questions clearly. 17. The instructor was available for students. Please list ONE outstanding characteristic of this instructor.

Please list ONE aspect about this instructor that needs improvement and suggest a strategy for improvement.

Appendix 22A: Student Ratings of Instruction

of 5

Graduating Student Survey

Question: 60. The college/school's administration responded to problems and issues of concern to the student body.

Appendix 22B: AACP Surveys

of 5


Question: 61. I was aware of the process for raising issues with the college/school administration.


of 5


Question: 62. I was aware that student representatives served on college/school committees with responsibility for curriculum and other matters.


of 5


Question: 65. The college/school of pharmacy had a student government that effectively communicated student opinions and perspectives to the faculty or administration.


of 5


Question: 66. The college/school of pharmacy made use of a variety of means (e.g., course evaluations, student surveys, focus groups, meetings with administrative leaders) to obtain student perspectives on curriculum, student services, faculty/student relationships and other aspects of the program.


standard no 22 student representation and perspectives€¦ · the other methods (e.g., focus...

Documents