S t a n d t o R e a s o n 1438 E. 33rd Street Signal Hill, CA 90755 1.800.2.REASON www.str.org

JULY 2007

Quick Summary

November/December 2010

Authors Foreword

clear thinking christianity: There are apps for that!

learn at: www.str.org

strs student site:www.STRplace.org

str weekly broadcast live sundays, 2-5 p.m. ptListen live on the radio (check affiliates at STRs Radio Page)

listen live onlinewww.kbrt740.com

listen live on your smart-phone using WunderRadio, Flycast (search for KBRT) or Smartphone Apps

listen to the podcastsSTRs podcast page

Follow STR on Twitter

Find STR on Facebook

read: Solid Ground Archives

Down the Rabbit Hole

Philosophy R.I.P.

Physics Is Everything

The Big Squeeze

Inside the Goldfish Bowl

A Theory of Everything

Sometimes, news from the other side can be frightening, especially when coming from scientists with impeccable credentials. Here, for example, is the latest flash:

The laws of physics explain everything. The scientific account is complete. Therefore, miracles are impossible, theology is unnecessary, and God is superfluous.

When brilliant men like Oxford mathematician Stephen Hawking (A Brief History of Time) and Cal Tech physicist Leonard Mlodinow make dogmatic declarations like these based on the weird world of quantum physics, it stops us in our tracks.

Men of this stature making statements of this breadth can easily take the wind out of our sails. Their credentials are so impressive and their subject matter so obtuse, the temptation is strong to wave the flag of surrender and retreat into our prayer closets.

In their new book, The Grand Design, Hawking and Mlodinow aim to use science not just to becalm our efforts as Christian theists, but to sink our ship. You do not need to master quantum mechanics, however, to see the problems with these scientists assertions. Just read this issue of Solid Ground carefully.

I do not address the physics proper. It is out of my ken. Other, more able menlike Hawkings erstwhile colleague Roger Penrose and philosopher William Lane Craighave already weighed in against Hawking and Mlodinow.

I am capable, however, of recognizing when a point commits suicide. And even a cursory examination of the theories in The Grand Design show they self-destruct quickly. The authors own philosophical musings defeat them before they even get to the science.

Einstein famously said, The problem with us scientists is that we are very poor philosophers. In The Grand Design, Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow prove him right. When you are done with this issue of Solid Ground, I think you will see that in spite of their credentials, they offer nothing to give a thoughtful theist pause.

As we enter this season of Thanksgiving, STR has so much to be thankful for. Looking back on this year, we see Gods hand so clearly in the significant opportunities for outreach Hes brought our way. And we also see His wonderful hand in the financial support weve received through STRs faithful friends.

God has always used people to reach people. Your prayers and financial contributions this year have kept us close to our targets both in outreach and in meeting our monthly ministry expenses. For that we are very thankful.

If you look forward to the benefit you gain from resources like this months Solid Ground, I invite you to express your gratitude with a gift to STR today. Your contribution is a tangible way of helping our effort, and of expressing your passion for a Christianity worth thinking about.

With confidence in Christ,

Gregory Koukl

Print Friendly Version

https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/stand-to-reason/id372101808?mt=8http://www.str.orghttp://www.str.org/training/student-resourceshttp://www.str.org/training/broadcastwww.kbrt740.comhttp://www.wunderradio.com/stations.phphttp://www.str.org/blog/greg-on-the-radio-today#.UZ6eReiKuUkhttps://itunes.apple.com/us/app/stand-to-reason/id372101808?mt=8http://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=podcastwww.twitter.com/STRtweetshttp://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2215430678http://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Solid_Ground_Indexhttp://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5575http://www.str.org/site/DocServer/EnhancedSG1110Final.pdf?docID=4981http://www.str.org/site/DocServer/EnhancedSG1110Final.pdf?docID=4981http://www.str.org/site/DocServer/EnhancedSG1110Final.pdf?docID=4981http://www.str.orghttp://www.twitter.com/STRtweetshttp://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2215430678

S t a n d t o R e a s o n C h r i s t i a n i t y Wo r t h T h i n k i n g A b o u t

top 2

2page

Your Support Is Needed This Month

get strategic!Would you like to play a strategic role in STRs work? When you become a Strategic Partner and support STR with a monthly pledge, you join a special group of people who help to equip Christians to graciously defend classical Christianity and classical Christian values.

As I wrote in my opening remarks, STR depends on the support of friends like you to accomplish our mission - training and equipping Ambassadors for Christ.

May I encourage you to take just a moment and make a gift to STR today? We couldnt do what we do without you. I hope you agree that what STR brings you through this Enhanced Solid Ground, the radio broadcast, our blog, and online resources helps to get you thinking and equips you to become a more effective ambassador for Christ.Thanks for taking a moment to make a donation that will keep resources like these available.

STR, building Ambassadors through dynamic content.

sign up today...

Sign up to receive Gregs bi-monthly mentoring letters:. You can also choose to receive the Solid Ground print edi-tion. Each month, Greg writes a personal letter covering a tactic or timely chal-lenge to the Christian faith. By subscrib-ing free, youll also receive the monthly STR Suggests, which highlights a new resource in the world of apologetics that we think is worthy of attention. Youll also receive a heads up when one of STRs speakers will be speaking in your area.

Subscribe here.

Strategic Partner

Information

Please

Today

NEW Updated Radio Pageat str.org

http://www.str.org/str-subscriptions/gregs-mentoring-letterhttps://www.str.org/donate/strategic-partnershttps://www.str.org/donate/strategic-partnershttps://www.str.org/donate/strategic-partnershttp://www.str.org/site/PageServer?pagename=Radio_Archives

3page

S o l i d G r o u n d A F o u n d a t i o n f o r B u i l d i n g A m b a s s a d o r s

top 3

Quantum physics. Ugh. The term itself is enough to make grown men weep and send theologians scurrying. It can also send chills up the spine of the Christian marshalling evidence from science for the existence of God.

Stephen Hawking is the quantum king. The Lucasian professor of mathematics at the University of Cambridge for 30 years, his Brief History of Time, published in 1988, sold nine million copies. According to The New York Times, Hawking is the most revered scientist since Einstein.1So when Stephen Hawking says quantum physics renders philosophy dead, theology unnecessary, and a Creator superfluous, the temptation is strong to roll over and wave the white flag of surrender.

Down the Rabbit HoleHawkings new book, The Grand Design, co-

authored with Cal Tech physicist Leonard Mlodinow, makes all those claims, and more. One cant read very far in the book, though, without wondering if hes just stepped over the edge and tumbled down Alices rabbit hole.

Its the feeling I had reading the transcript of an airing of Larry King Live when King, Hawking, Mlodinow, and Deepak Chopra opined about the book. At many points the discussion moved beyond esoteric to borderline incoherent. Here, in no particular order, is a sampling of the panels comments on nothing:2

Hawking: Gravity and quantum theory cause universes to be created spontaneously out of nothing. [Non-being creates being?]

King: Who created the nothing?Where did the nothing come from? [Nothing is created?]

Mlodinow: According to quantum theory, there is no such thing as nothingness. [Is this news, that no-thing-ness is not a thing?]

Chopra: Vashishtha said, infinite words come and go in the vast expanse of nothingness, which is consciousness. I believe this nothingness is not an empty void. Its the womb of creation. [What this means is anybodys guess.]

If youre confused by these remarks, youre not alone. Hawkings erstwhile colleague, Roger Penrose, said, Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense. Physicist John Wheeler (who coined the term black hole) said, If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it. Richard Feynmancited frequently in Hawkings bookfamously quipped, I think I can safely say that nobody understands quantum mechanics.3.

Suicide #1

I think I can safely say, then, that anybody who makes dogmatic assertions based on their interpretation of quantum mechanics is simply wishing on a star, even an esteemed mathematician like Stephen Hawking.

Theres another reason no one needs to fear the quantum physics trump card. Philosopher William Lane Craig points out that, though the equations of quantum mechanics seem sound, there are nearly a dozen different interpretations of how the abstract math plays out in the real world, and all have equal claims to legitimacy.4

Even so, the basic assertions of The Grand Design deserve a response. When Larry King asked Stephen Hawking to state the most important point in the book, Hawking answered, That science can explain the universe, and that we dont need God to explain why there is something rather than nothing or why the laws of nature are what they are.

In particular, Hawking and Mlodinow claim:

Philosophy is dead.The laws of physics explainand therefore

determineeverything.Miracles are impossible.There is no free will.Objective reality does not exist.God is not necessary to explain the existence or

the order of the universe.

As you will soon see, Hawkings arguments fail completely. He stumbles badly out of the starting gatehis foundational claims are doubly self-

The Grand Design: A Quantum Leap

By Greg Koukl

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/08/books/08book.htmlhttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1009/10/lkl.01.htmlhttp://phys.wordpress.com/2006/06/09/quantum-mechanical-quotes/http://phys.wordpress.com/2006/06/09/quantum-mechanical-quotes/

4page

S t a n d t o R e a s o n C h r i s t i a n i t y Wo r t h T h i n k i n g A b o u t

top 4refutingand his contention that the universe doesnt need God comes to nothing.

Philosophy R.I.P.When I was eight years old, I ran away from home.

Unhappy with parental restrictions, I thought I could fend for myself. While my mother wrung her hands and wept, my father calmly granted my request for freedom. He emptied my piggy bank into my pocket, shook my hand, and wished me well. I soon learned (in about two hours) that liberty came with a price, one too dear for a youngster to pay. I needed my parents.

On the opening page of his book, Stephen Hawking the scientist tries to run away from home. Philosophy, he writes, is dead. Philosophy has not kept up with modern developments in science, particularly physics. Scientists have become the bearers of the torch of discovery in our quest for knowledge.5

Suicide #2

What Hawking doesnt realize is that science cannot live on its own. It needs its parent, philosophy. The metaphor is apt because philosophy as a discipline not only gave birth to science, it also guides and guards the scientist so he does not get lost along the way.

Science doesnt exist in a vacuum. What science is, how it operates, and what boundaries constrain it are each features of philosophy, not of science itself. For example, in chapter three Hawking lists the virtues of a good scientific model.6 A good model

Is elegant.Contains few arbitrary or adjustable elements.Agrees with and explains all existing

observations.Makes detailed predictions capable of falsifying

the model.

The list is a good one. The tally, however, is not the product of science, but of philosophy, specifically the philosophy of science. The scientist who dismisses philosophy does not thereby rid himself of its task. He merely condemns himself to do the philosophers job poorly.

Stephen Hawking proves as much by spending the first 63 pagesone third of his bookwrestling with philosophical questions (the title of his first chapter is The Mystery of Being) before he even begins to address the science proper. He pontificates on free will and determinism, reality and illusion, right and wrong, reason and logicbut he does so artlessly and, as well see, hazardously.

Albert Einstein once quipped, The problem with us scientists is that we are very poor philosophers.

Stephen Hawking proves him right. Had he taken philosophy more seriously, he might not have stumbled so quickly.

In his second chapter, The Rule of Law, Stephen Hawking argues a point about physics that, if true, dooms the rest of his work to utter insignificance.

Physics Is EverythingI once witnessed a magnificent spectacle created

by falling dominoes. Legions of little blocks standing in formation morphed into a stunning work of art when the creator of the massive puzzle gave the first domino a flick. As one by one each domino fell against another in succession, a marvelous panorama unfolded before my eyes.

The picture that appeared was not the result of random events. It was determined beforehand by the specific order of the dominoes and the constraints of the laws of physics. Repeat the exact set-up, repeat the exact result.

Purely physical systems behave like that sea of toppling dominoes. Physical objects collide with each other throughout the universe in very precise ways based on their initial conditions and governed by uniform natural law. This is what allows science

to operate in the first place. The deterministic nature of physical systems7 makes experimental repeatability possible.

Generally, science acknowledges two kinds of causes. The first is the kind of cause determining the configuration of the collapsing dominoesevent causation. The second (the finger flick) is the kind of cause that initiated the cascade to begin withagent causation (a human agent, in this case).

Hear William Lane Craigs critique of The Grand Design by Stephen Hawking with Greg

Download an mp3 of the interview here.

http://www.jpmoreland.com/2010/09/22/scientism-makes-scientists-laughable/http://www.jpmoreland.com/2010/09/22/scientism-makes-scientists-laughable/http://www.strcast2.org/podcast/weekly/091910.m4ahttp://www.strcast2.org/podcast/weekly/091910.m4a

5page

S o l i d G r o u n d A F o u n d a t i o n f o r B u i l d i n g A m b a s s a d o r s

top 5Hawking and Mlodinow characterize the first

kind of cause as scientific determinism (SD). Heres how they describe it: Given the state of the universe at one time, a complete set of laws fully determines both the future and the past. This would exclude the possibility of miracles or an active role for God.8

Quite right. These two sentences sit side by side for a reason. By stipulating

that natural law fully determines every event in natural history, the authors aim to squeeze God permanently out of the equation. Simply put, physics is everything. The scientific account is complete, Hawking told Larry King. Theology is unnecessary.

For Hawking and Mlodinow, though, event causation governs everythingeven human choices. Determinism is absolute. There are no exceptions, even human ones. Everything, including human nature, must submit to the sovereignty of physics:

Since people live in the universe and interact with other objects in it, then scientific determinism must hold for people as well.9

Do people have free will?...Though we feel that we can choose...biological processes are governed by the laws of physics and chemistry and therefore are as determined as the orbits of the planets.10

Our physical brain, following the known laws of sciencedetermines our actions, and not some agency that exists outside those laws.11

So it seems that we are no more than biological machines and that free will is just an illusion.12 [emphases added]

Its hard to believe brilliant men like Hawking and Mlodinow do not see how destructive this move is to their own case, but I think you will see it readily.

Let me put the question this way: Did the laws of physics determine the order of the words on the pages of The Grand Design? Or did Professors Hawking and Mlodinow make that call? Did they ponder the evidence for their theories, consider the implications of the facts, posit conclusions, then choose the right words and select the precise order that would best communicate their views and persuade readers of the rationality of their own ideas?

Note that each of the emphasized words above denotes free acts of will made by conscious

agents. Without genuine freedom, then pondering, considering, positing, choosing, selecting, communicating, persuading, and reasoning would all be impossible in the sense that we normally use those terms.

Therefore, in light of SD, the authors would have to opt for the first alternativeultimately, the laws of physics wrote the book that bears their names no less than the laws of physics determined the arrangement of rocks resting on the surface of the planet Mars.

They have no other choice (no pun is intended here; I mean this literally). Remember, the only causation Hawking & Mlodinow allow for is event causationdominoes fatalistically fallingwhich is rigidly deterministic.

The Big SqueezeIf Hawking is right about SD, then it is impossible

for him to know it. Knowledge is a combination of true belief based on adequate reason.13 But reason plays no role in deterministic systems. Hawkings convictions would not be conclusions, but rather the inevitable results of natural law compelling the molecules of his brain to cause his body to dictate the words that appear on the pages of The Grand Design.

Suicide #3

By the authors own admission, SD is central to the argument in their book (This book is rooted in the concept of scientific determinism).14 But SD makes arguments themselves impossible because the operation of reason requires free will. Consequently, everything that follows the assertion of SD (including the notion that miracles or an active role for God are impossible) tumbles down like a house of cards.

If you follow this point, you wont need to read any more of this articleor any more of Hawkings book. There is no reason to turn another page, because nothing that Hawking argues could possibly be known. Hawking could never know if his M-theory of the universe were true if his conviction is produced by the laws of physics instead of by the dictates of reason.

By squeezing out free will and genuine human agency in his attempt to squeeze out God, Stephen Hawking squeezes himself out of the picture as well. He disqualifies himself as author, scientist, man of reason (and also humanitarian, kind co-worker, loving husband, etc., but that is a different matter).15

The only way out is to surrender SD. Hawking can acknowledge the general uniformity of natural law, but admit the obviousthat agents (like himself) are not subject to its dictates. Rather, they can

If Hawking is right about scientificdeterminism it is impossible for him to know it.

6page

greg eXplores science & FaithDeepen your understanding of this provacative subject.

S t a n d t o R e a s o n C h r i s t i a n i t y Wo r t h T h i n k i n g A b o u t

top 6

Find even more resources at STR.org

intervene to change the course of natural events. They can start the dominoes, stop the dominoes, or redirect the dominoes at will.

Clearly, agency is real, and it operates by a different dynamic than the natural order does. Arguments are not subject to the laws of nature any more than the laws of reason can alter the mass of a molecule.

And if human agents are not bound by physics, then why would a divine agentwho arguably authored the laws to begin withbe bound by them? More specifically, how does Hawking know miracles are impossible? He gives no reason. He simply declares it to be so (by asserting SD), and then belittles the alternative.

Leonard Mlodinow told Larry King, Theres never been in any science experimentany indication that everything in the universe does not follow physical laws.16 But science experiments themselveshaving been designed by human agentsare not the product of physical laws, but rather the will of the scientist.

Suicide #4

If Hawking and Mlodinow are right about SD, they are wrong about everything in their book, because knowledge is impossible in the rigidly determined world they affirm. Science itself is undermined by scientific determinism. However, if they are wrong about SD, then they cannot arbitrarily dismiss God as a possible player in the cosmic arena.

The logical implications of scientific determinism cause Hawkings grand design to implode. His theories are doubly dead, however, because they commit suicide in yet another way.

Inside the Goldfish BowlIn What Is Reality?, chapter three of The Grand

Design, Hawking and Mlodinow ponder the predicament of the goldfish.

The world appears different to a goldfish looking out from the inside of its bowl, than it does to us

looking in from the outside. The lens of the glass has a distorting affect, bending the light and altering the images that appear on the other side.

But which side is distorted, the authors ask, the fishs or ours?

How do we know we have the true, undistorted picture of reality? Might not we ourselves also

be inside some big goldfish bowl and have our vision distorted by an enormous lens? The goldfishs picture of reality is different from ours, but can we be sure it is less real?17

Since there is no picture- or theory-independent concept of reality,18 the answer they give is that

there is no way to know. The best we can do, the authors suggest, is simply to formulate a viewa modelthat seems to work from our perspective, and leave it at that. Hawking calls this approach model-dependent realism.

This language here is misleading, though. In discussions about the ultimate nature of reality, the term realism generally means that the external world is real and that it exists, more or less, the way we perceive it to be. Even when there are distorting elements (like goldfish bowls), our perceptive and cognitive abilities allow us to make appropriate adjustments.

However, realism is precisely what Hawking and Mlodinow deny. How do we know we are not just characters in a computer-generated soap opera?, they wonder.19 No model of reality can be said to be more real than the other.20

Our perception, they point out, is not direct, but rather shaped by a kind of lens, the interpretive structure of our human brains.21 And this distorting influence is impossible for us to escape. All that can be claimed of any scientific theory is that it accounts for the facts better than others, nothing more. It could never be declared true in the ordinary sense of the word.

Hawkings and Mlodinows hypothesis is a costly one, however. Note, first, that this is a radical departure from the canons of conventional science, and Hawking knows it: Classical science is based

Download your MP3 file today!Listen as Greg reveals how a philosophical commitment to naturalism stifles the search for truth, and that rather than being hostile to science, biblical Christianity is the seedbed that gave modern science its start.

http://store.str.org/

7page

top 7

LISTen noW

Greg talks about this edition of Solid Ground.

oR SuBSCRIBe foR LaTeR

and undermines everything else that follows. Hawking sabotages his own views three times, and each wound is fatal.

Any sound theory of everything needs to make sense of everything that needs explaining. It needs to account for the existence and order of the universe. It must make room for event and agent causation, and the consciousness that accompanies the ability to freely choose. It must make sense of the laws of logic, the basic reliability of our sensory abilities, and the unique human obligation of morality.

And it must speak to the deepest needs of our souls, because they also are a part of everything that needs to be explained.

There is a theory that will do it allthe view of reality held by Jesus of Nazareth, a view now called Christian theism. His basic understanding of reality resonates with our deepest intuitions about the way the world actually is.

We live in a universe created with a word by an intelligent, powerful, eternal Spirit. The existence of the world is due to His will. The magnificent design of creation is due to His wisdom.

Human beings are made in His image as moral creatures fashioned for a divine purpose. We are able to know which side of the goldfish bowl were on because Hes equipped our minds with a perceptual ability that connects us to the real world, making a discipline like science possible in the first place.

If Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow are really looking for answers, then Christian theism explains everything that needs

explaining: existence, specified complexity (information), the uniformity of natural law, genuine acts of freedom, human dignity and purpose, acts of virtue and vice, rationality, true moral guilt, and ultimate meaning.

It has enough sophistication and explanatory power to satisfy the yearnings of the greatest minds of historyAugustine, Aquinas, Galileo, Newton, Kepler, to name but a fewyet enough simplicity in

on the belief that there exists a real external world whose properties are definite and independent of the observer who perceives them.22 Without the ability to accurately assess the world, though, what becomes of the magisterium of science?

One also wonders what to make of the inviolability of Hawkings scientific determinism if he is right about the implications of goldfish bowls. It seems even SD would have to be demoted to the status of distorted perception. Since scientific determinism is the basis for all modern science,23 that noble discipline is thus assaulted a second time.

Regardless, a much more damaging concern surfaces when we ask the following question: What are we to make of the point of chapter three itself, Hawkings non-realism? It seems we have two possible choices. We can accept it as true, or we can reject it as false. Clearly, Hawking would have us side with him. But, oddly, he has not left that option open to useven theoreticallybecause the minute we agree with him, we prove him false. Heres why.

Suicide #5

If Hawking is right that all perceptions are distorted by the lens of the interpretive structure of our brains, then his own theory would be a result of those distorted (and, therefore, unreliable) perceptions. Perhaps, on the other hand, the professors theory was the result of a moment of perceptual clarity in which he saw the world as it really was. But if those moments are available to Dr. Hawking, why are they denied to the rest of us?

As it turns out, Hawkings and Mlodinows view is sabotaged in the same way all such postmodern views are: It self-destructs. They claim there are no accurate representations of reality. Then they ground their conviction on facts about perception, brain activity, and interpretive structures they take to be true, undistorted, and accurate to reality. Therefore, The Grand Design is refuted a second time, even before getting to the science proper.

A Theory of EverythingFor someone like Stephen Hawking searching

for a satisfying theory of everything, The Grand Design turns out to be a quantum leap of self-defeating incoherence that explains almost nothing.

By asserting scientific determinism, Hawking paints himself into a fatalistic corner where it is impossible for him to know anything at all. By opting for the anti-realism of model-dependent realism, he immediately falsifies the SD he has just asserted, defeats his own anti-realist speculations,

S o l i d G r o u n d A F o u n d a t i o n f o r B u i l d i n g A m b a s s a d o r s

The theories of The Grand Designself-destruct. Hawking offers nocoherent view of reality and uses bad science to try to make his case.

http://www.strcast2.org/podcast/greg/1110sg.mp3http://www.strcast2.org/podcast/greg/1110sg.mp3http://www.christianitytoday.com/ch/131christians/scholarsandscientists/galileo.htmlhttp://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.htmlhttp://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/sciencefaith.html

S t a n d t o R e a s o n C h r i s t i a n i t y Wo r t h T h i n k i n g A b o u t8page

top 8

the foundational notions to be grasped by a child.

It also provides the most important answer of all, the solution to the human conditionforgiveness leading to that for which we all deeply hunger, the fullness of existence found only in an eternal friendship with God.

And no quantum leap is necessary to believe. Only a simple step of trust that is consistent with all the facts.

Endnotes1. Dwight Garner, Many Kinds of Universes,

and None Require God, The New York Times, 9/7/10.

2. Larry King Live, 9/10/10.

3. These quotes can be found at this link.

4. Interview with William Lane Craig, 9/19/10

5. Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design (New York: Bantam Books, 2010), 5.

6. Ibid, 51.

7. At least on the supra-atomic level.

8. Hawking Mlodinow, 30.

9. Ibid, 30.

10. Ibid, 31-32.

11. Ibid, 32.

Putting Your Knowledge into Action

Dont be intimidated by those who claim that sci-ence can explain everything. Remember that just as a runaway child cant survive without his par-ents, science cant exist without philosophy.

Remember that there are two kinds of causes: event and agent.Denying agent causation is a self-refuting argument that ignores the obvious.

Keep in mind that the claim that there are no accurate representations of reality is just another postmodern view that is self-destructive.

12. Ibid.

13. This is the classic philosophical definition of knowledge: justified true belief (JTB).

14. Hawking and Mlodinow, 34.

15. Moral virtues also require human freedom. SD makes morality unintelligible.

16. Larry King Live, 9/10/10.

17. Hawking and Mlodinow, 39.

18. Ibid, 42.

19. Ibid.

20. Ibid, 51.

21. Ibid, 46.

22. Ibid, 43.

23. Ibid, 30.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/08/books/08book.htmlhttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/08/books/08book.htmlhttp://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1009/10/lkl.01.htmlhttp://phys.wordpress.com/2006/06/09/quantum-mechanical-quotes/http://www.str.org/blog/william-lane-craig-on-postmodernism#.UZ6mr-iKuUk

9page

To get information about inviting an STR speaker to your church, email Amy@str.org for Brett or Alan, or Melinda@str.org for Greg.

top 9

Stand to Reason Resources...Be Prepared

The Reason for God DVD and Discussion Guide *NEW*, Timothy Keller, DVD Runtime: 120 Minutes, 96-Page Booklet (DVD026) $28.79DVD and Discussion Guide available separately for $22.49 (DVD025) and $8.99 (BK348)

Pastor and author Timothy Keller meets with a group of skeptics

over six sessions to debate their doubts and questions about Christianity. Using literature, philosophy, real-life experiences, and constant reference to the Bible, Keller explains how the belief in a Christian God is a sound and rational one.

Session titles include:1. How can there be only one true religion? 2. Why does God allow suffering? 3. How could a loving God send people to Hell? 4. Hasnt science disproved Christianity? 5. How can you take the Bible literally? 6. What is Christianity all about?

Saving Leonardo: A Call to Resist the Secular Assault *NEW*, Nancy Pearcey, 336 pages, Hardcover (BK346) $24.29A former agnostic, Pearcey offers a persuasive case for historic Christianity as a holistic and humane alternative to secularism. She equips readers to counter the life-denying

worldviews that are radically restructuring society and pervading our daily lives. Whether you are a devoted Christian, determined secularist, or dont know quite where you stand, readingSaving Leonardowill challenge your thinking. More than 100 reproductions and illustrations.

The Ambassadors Guide to Pluralism *NEW* Gregory Koukl, 32 Pages (BK347) $4.95 As a Christian, I believe that Jesus is the only way for me, but I cant say He is the way for others.Statements like this have become increasingly common among Christians of all stripes and betray a deeply confused understanding of the Christian

message. In The Ambassasors Guide to Pluralism, Greg exposes the error behind this relativistic religion, identifying and repudiating the three corrosive elements that prompt such confused confessions: theological uncertainty, religious pluralism, and Christian inclusivism.

STR Speakers Schedules

Greg Koukl

November1 Agronomy Christian Fellowship, Long Beach, CA 8-9:30 p.m. 7 Windsor Road Christian Church, Champaign, IL Contact: www.windsorroad.org18-20 EPS Apologetics Conference, Atlanta, GA http://www.epsapologetics.com

December3 Search Ministries, Minn., MN Contact: http://www.searchmn.org/12 Saddleback Church, Lake Forest, CA 5 p.m. Topic: Jesus Birth and Resurreciton Contact:

http://www.saddleback.com/

Brett Kunkle

November18-20 EPS Apologetics Conference, Marietta, GA Time: 8:30 p.m. Topics: Truth and the Real

World, The New Atheists: Old Arguments, New Attitude, Is One Way the Only Way?, Q&A Panel Contact: www.epsapologetics.com

Alan Shlemon

November14 Covina First Southern Baptist Church, Covina, CA 11:00 a.m. Topic: TBD Contact: (626)

332-8223

December12 Covina First Southern Baptist Church, Covina, CA 11:00 a.m. Topic: TBD Contact: (626)

332-8223

Evangelical Philisophical Society 9th Annual Conference

mailto:amy@str.orgmailto:melinda@str.orghttp://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=7975http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=111723http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=110922http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=110742http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=111621http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=111622http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8035http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=110861http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8033http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=111642http://www.str.org/site/Calendar/178506324?view=Detail&id=111643http://www.epsapologetics.com/http://www.epsapologetics.com/

Contact Us Today

(800) 2-REASON (562) 595-7332 WWW.STR.ORG WWW.STRPLACE.ORG

S o l i d G r o u n d A F o u n d a t i o n f o r B u i l d i n g A m b a s s a d o r s

share on Facebook or twitter

Stand to Reason Speakers

Stand to Reason faculty members are available to speak and help you effectively engage the culture around you with knowledge, wisdom, and character. STR offers lectures and seminars geared towards helping Christians gain practical tools they need to make a difference in their world, giving them both the knowledge and confidence to be players in the world of ideas.

Contact STR today to schedule Greg, Brett or Alan for your conference, church service or special event.

top 10

10page

Bring STR to Your Next Event

Building Ambassadors Online

We think Enhanced Solid Ground is perfect for sharing with your friends, and its never been easier. Simply attach this pdf to an outgoing email. You can also forward the STR email containing the link to the Enhanced Solid Ground to anyone youd like.

First time readers, receive a FREE mp3 of Ambassadors for Christ: The Essential Skills by Greg Koukl. Visit our online store and use this discount code at checkout: NEWREGGIFT. Please only new friends.

share with a Friend we encourage you to do so! Join the Conversation

You can talk with fellow STR listeners every week live during our radio broadcast. Use Twitter to engage, challenge and encourage other listeners discussing the significant topics of our day.

Look for free book giveaways.

Follow: STRtalk Search: #STRtalk

http://www.str.orghttp://www.str.org/training/student-resourceshttp://store.str.org/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=CD206http://store.str.org/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=CD206http://store.str.org/http://twitter.com/#!/strtalkhttp://twitter.com/#search?q=%23strtalk

header logo button: Button 26: twitter button page 1: facebook button pg1: Button 27: top pg 2: previous page 9: next page 8: Download SP info 3: Donate 3: Button 34: Button 35: top pg 3: previous page: next page: top pg 4: previous page 2: next page 2: Download 1: top pg 5: previous page 3: next page 3: top pg 6: previous page 4: next page 4: Button 28: Button 40: top pg 7: previous page 5: next page 5: previous page 8: next page 7: top pg 8: Calendar: top pg 9: previous page 6: next page 6: Buy 1: Buy 2: Buy 3: Button 38: Twitter: Facebook: top pg 10: previous page 7: cover page: first page: Button 29: Button 30: Button 31: Button 32: