staffing & selection © nancy brown johnson staffing and selection making decisions about how to...
TRANSCRIPT
HR Planning
Forecasting Demand Product Demand
labor derived demand past demand (if stable) other leading indicators
Forecasting Supply Turnover Promotions
Reconciliation of Supply & Demand
Shortages Plan for training Counter-cyclical hiring Wage increases Innovative recruiting Overtime Subcontract Temporary help Other trends in staffing arrangements
Temporary Workers
Fewer benefits Try out employees Already trained Tension with permanent employees
second class citizens permanent employees threatened lack commitment
Oversupply
Downsizing increased or decreased productivity loss of good employees commitment among survivors
Traditionally
Tried to optimize job based skills and abilities.
Today more consideration of the match between the person and the organization
Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) Theory People are attracted to
organizations where they feel comfortable.
Organizations try to select people who fit within the organization.
People who do not fit, will leave.
ASA Results
Organizations become more homogeneous over time
Recognizes the need to consciously select people that fit within organization
Organizations may also need to consciously change recruiting to attract people who are different.
Realistic Job Previews
Recruiter's information is accurate. Realistic Job Preview Vaccination - prevents formation of
unrealistic expectations. Choice based on accurate and balanced
information - judging job based upon needs.
More freedom & choice More committed when free to choose.
Realistic Job Previews
Works best when: candidate can be selective in accepting a job offer has unrealistic job expectations would have difficulty coping with job demands
without RJP
Two Ways to Staff Job Recruiting
Externally - recruiting people from outside the organization.
a. brings in fresh blood
b. costly
c. new people may hinder group morale
Second Way to Staff
Internally - moves between jobs in an organization. Important for organization
Affects career decisions Can be a reward
less expensive know more about the people rewards past performance can enhance
morale
Signaling Theory
When you go into the marketplace to buy a good or service you may get a lemon
This is because there is information asymmetry- you know more about the quality of what you are selling than the buyer (e.g., you know more about your job skills than a potential employer)
Consequently, there is the potential for adverse selection: hiring the wrong person because you did not have enough information
This is expensive-you could get stuck with a lemon
What sort of workforce does the firm want?
Fits with firm culture, technology, strategy, & environment
Diversity: diverse workforce increases innovation, less diversity better for efficiency
Signaling Theory
Policies and practices of the firm can signal in the labor market what type of worker the firm wants Screening practices Compensation practices can help screen workers
Similarly, firms use signals that applicants send to make decisions (where they go to school)
Applicant self-selection: Output v. Input Pay Ideally what you want is for applicants to self-select
Firms use their general reputation through pay, training, and selection practices
What types of signals would a firm send who pays above market v. below market?
McDonalds will hire almost anyone; Toyota is hard to get hired
Thus, it is important that firms send signals of the type of employees they want
One example of signaling
Output based pay: pay based upon what you produce
Input based pay: amount of time or effort spent on an activity
Output Pay
Screening workers induces inefficient
workers to leave will leave when pay falls
short of next best alternative
more productive workers will go to A
Pay
Sales5
500
A
B
Signals
Incentive compensation signals to potential employees must be productive or they will not be successful
May discourage less potentially productive employees not to even want to work for that firm
External environment influences
Labor market - loose/tight markets affect abundance of candidates
Legal - legal concerns salient in recruiting.
Recruiting Sources
College Students Walk-ins Employee Referrals Advertising Job Fairs Private Employment Agencies Public Employment Agencies
Effectiveness of Methods
Two ways to judge effectiveness Does technique generate good candidates? Does technique generate good employees?
Effectiveness of Recruiting Newspapers and other advertising generates
most candidates Referrals and rehires of previous employees
have best attendance & performance Informal techniques appear best: employee
referrals, rehires & walk-ins.
Selection
Selection is the process of determining which individuals will staff the organization.
Trying to find people who will best staff the organization.
Includes: interviewing, tests, weighing education & experience, recommendations
Good Selection Pays Off
25% of firms spend at least $1,000 for salesperson
50% - $1000-$5,000. Most employees don't pay back salary for a
year. Wrong person can cost 3½X their salary.
Reliability
test-re-test: give people same test at two time periods
parallel or equivalent forms: give different tests that measure the same thing
internal consistency: a single test is subdivided to see if people respond in the same way.
Inter-rater reliability: do different raters rate consistently
Validity
Validity - are you measuring what you want to measure?
In Selection: Does our selection instrument predict job performance?
Use statistical techniques to correlate the score on the test/interview with job performance
Key Definitions
Predictors - personnel selection devices. Interviews Ability Tests Recommendations
Criterion - variable used to measure job performance. Turnover Absenteeism Productivity Performance Appraisal
Utility
Is the payoff from implementing new predictor worth it?
Weighs the potential benefits against the potential costs.
Utility of selection devises depends whether it improves the quality of individuals selected over what they would have been had the devise not been used.
Utility= quantity X quality - cost Quantity = Number People Selected/Year Quality = validity coefficient (how useful is the test?)
What proportion of those selected considered successful?
What is good job performance worth? What is the variation in good & bad job
performance How selective can you be?
Cost = N(C) What does the selection test cost?
Changes in Cut Score
False positive-test says to hire but it was a mistake
False negatives-test says not to hire but would have been good employee
Raising Cut Score
Decreases false positives
Increases false negatives
Test Score
Job Performance
Good
Good
False Negative
False Positive
Interviews
Most frequently used and most controversial method of selection.
Other functions: public relations, organization communicates what it has to offer the applicant, and can fill in gaps in application blank.
However, recent evidence suggests that individual interviewers may be highly accurate in predicting job success
Interviews Unreliable and Invalid
Difficult cognitive task: manage conversation listen process information remember
Improving Interview Validity
Restrict the use of interviews to the KSAs that interviews can assess most effectively: personal relations, sociability & citizenship
Use structure - consistent information from applicants
Job related questions - direct and specific information about the job.
Behavioral interviews ask about how applicants have performed jobs or handled problems in the past
Situational interviews: provide a scenario typical of the job and then ask how to handle it
More Improving Interview Validity Formalize scoring - rating scales on a series
of characteristics. Team approach - several interviewers as a
group interview the applicant. Train the interviewer
1. accurately receive information 2. critically evaluate information 3. regulate their own behavior in asking questions.
Applications
Used to get person's background & experience minimum requirements comparing their strengths and weaknesses
EEOC guidelines recommend against certain questions with adverse impact. The questions need to be job related.
Lying
Applications were compared with factual data. 25% listed previous employers that said they were
never employed 25% disagreement on reasons for leaving 57% duration of previous employment 72% on salary
Misuse and Bias
Weighted application blanks - scoring of application blank. Weight questions related to job success Must insure no weights for age, sex and marital
status.
Ability Tests
Intelligence tests - yield a single intelligence score.
Mental ability tests - multiple scores: verbal work fluency, math, spatial relations.
Relatively high validity
Personality Tests
Personality - unique characteristics that define an individual. determines individual's pattern of interaction
Personality not related to job performance except for some situations and for some purposes tests don't identify dimensions important for job
performance
Combining Methods
Multiple hurdle - Each test represents hurdle and if fails any level then don't get job. Advantage - inexpensive
Compensatory - all tests given to everyone. Exceptional performance may offset poor
performance on another. Advantage - higher validity.
Probationary Period
Probably the best way is to try people out Internal labor markets use to some degree by
not promoting those who are not deemed worthy Costs: you have to spend resources selecting
and training Workers may work hard just in probationary
period Maybe harder to get rid of employee following the
probationary period
Credentials as a signal
MBA from a top notch school maybe just getting in to that school
Signals desirable talents However, applicants will figure this out and
start getting MBAs Thus, there is noise and might require
additional screening