st. edmond champion report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. these materials were...

40
FINAL REPORT Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment Toronto Catholic District School Board St. Edmund Campion Catholic School, 30 Highcastle Rd Scarborough, Ontario PROJECT NO. 1025760

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

FINAL REPORT

Asbestos-Containing Building Material Assessment

Toronto Catholic District School Board

St. Edmund Campion Catholic School,

30 Highcastle Rd

Scarborough, Ontario

PROJECT NO. 1025760

Page 2: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

PROJECT NO. 1025760 REPORT TO Toronto Catholic District School Board

80 Sheppard Avenue East Toronto, Ontario

M2N 6E8

FOR Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment – Final Report

ON St. Edmund Campion Catholic School 30 Highcastle Road

Scarborough, Ontario

March 11, 2008

Jacques Whitford

7271 Warden Avenue

Markham, Ontario

L3R 5X5

Phone: 905-474-7700

Fax: 905-479-9326

www.jacqueswhitford.com

Page 3: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District

School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of St.

Edmund Campion Catholic School, located at 30 Highcastle Road in Scarborough, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new

asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act

(OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-

containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for

construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this

information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, asbestos-containing materials were identified to

be present at the subject facility. Table 1 below provides a summary of the materials identified and

recommendations on their management.

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations

Issue Comments Recommendation

Asbestos Friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of insulating cement on pipe fittings and hot water tank-body insulation. These materials were observed to be in good condition.

Non-friable asbestos-containing materials were identified to be present in the form of 12”x12” vinyl floor tiles. These materials were observed to be in good condition.

Presumed asbestos-containing materials (PACMs) were identified to be present in the form of cement pipe, caulking materials, roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity.

Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content.

Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

The statements made in this Executive Summary text are subject to the same limitations included in the

Closure Section 8.0, and are to be read in conjunction with the remainder of this report.

Page 4: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 ii

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ i

Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment ......................................................... 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1

1.1 Assessment Objectives ........................................................................................................... 1

1.2 Scope of Work ......................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW............................................................................................................. 2

3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY........................................................................................... 2

4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................ 3

5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .............................................................................................. 3

6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION....................................................................... 4

6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials .................................................................................... 5

6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................. 5

6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................................................................... 5

6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................................................................................ 5

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................... 6

8.0 CLOSURE ............................................................................................................................... 6

List of Tables

Table 1 – Summary of Findings and Recommendations .................................................................... i

List of Appendices

APPENDIX 1 Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials ...................... 1 APPENDIX 2 Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content ............. 2 APPENDIX 3 Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials ............................... 3 APPENDIX 4 Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy ................. 4 APPENDIX 5 Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos-Containing Materials ........................ 5 APPENDIX 6 Terms and Definitions ......................................................................................... 6

Page 5: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 1

ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS ASSESSMENT

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Jacques Whitford Limited (Jacques Whitford) was commissioned by the Toronto Catholic District

School Board (TCDSB) to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Assessment of St.

Edmund Campion Catholic School, located at 30 Highcastle Road in Scarborough, Ontario.

The purpose of the assessment was to assist the TCDSB to meet the requirements of the new

asbestos regulation, Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health and Safety Act

(OHSA), effective November 1, 2005. The assessment also includes the identification of asbestos-

containing materials (ACMs) that may require special attention.

The assessment was performed for the purposes of long term management of asbestos, and not for

construction or renovations purposes. Additional intrusive testing may be required prior to using this

information for construction or renovation.

The work was carried out in accordance with the requirements of the OHSA.

1.1 Assessment Objectives

The objective of the assessment was to:

� prepare an assessment report that identifies asbestos-containing materials present at the subject facility; and,

� provide recommendations for the management of these materials.

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work for this assessment involved the following:

� a “room-by-room” visual assessment of readily accessible room spaces of the subject facility for the presence of asbestos-containing building materials;

� an inventory of building materials/components that are suspected to contain asbestos;

� the collection of representative bulk samples from building materials suspected of containing asbestos fibres;

� laboratory analysis for the determination of the type and concentration of asbestos present in the samples submitted; and,

� preparation of a report documenting the results of the assessment, providing an interpretation of the laboratory analysis results and recommendations for the management of any asbestos containing materials.

Page 6: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 2

2.0 DOCUMENT REVIEW

The SAP inventory provided by Toronto Catholic District School Board and documents on site, where

available, were reviewed by Jacques Whitford prior to the assessment.

3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY

A room-by-room visual assessment of the subject facility was made in order to check for the presence

of materials suspected of containing asbestos.

During the assessment, locations to collect discrete bulk asbestos samples of suspect building

materials were identified. Samples of representative materials were then collected at these locations in

accordance with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the Occupational Health

and Safety Act.

An assessment of the condition, accessibility and exposure risk was completed for each occurrence of

an asbestos-containing material. The Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC)

document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 – Asbestos Management” (Last Revised June 16th,

1999) was used as the basis for the criteria that was applied in evaluating the presence of asbestos-

containing materials at the subject areas, where applicable.

Samples of suspect ACMs from various building materials were collected and submitted to EMSL

Laboratories Inc. (EMSL) located in Westmont, New Jersey, for analysis using Polarized Light

Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion staining. The analysis was conducted following the U.S. EPA/600/R-

93/116 Methods. EMSL is certified under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

(NVLAP) to perform asbestos analysis of bulk samples.

The number of bulk samples was based on the requirements of the new asbestos regulation that

specifies the minimum number of samples of a particular building material that should be collected and

tested to consider a material non-asbestos-containing. A positive stop option was used during the

laboratory analysis of the building materials suspected to contain asbestos. Multiple samples of

visually similar material were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

The positive stop option involves testing a series of samples from a particular building material until test

results indicate the presence of asbestos. When this occurs, the remaining samples are not tested.

This is a cost effective method of limiting the number of samples that are ultimately tested.

Additionally, materials that had been previously sampled and identified to contain asbestos were

referenced from available reports and not re-tested.

A summary list of the bulk samples collected by Jacques Whitford, including a description of the

material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.

Page 7: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 3

4.0 ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS

This report reflects the observations made within the subject facility only, and the results of analyses

performed on specific materials sampled during the assessment. Analytical results reflect the sampled

materials at the specific sampling locations.

Due to access restrictions imposed by working in occupied and operational spaces, the asbestos

content of some building materials could not be determined at some locations. Where applicable,

building materials that were not sampled but that may contain asbestos include, but are not limited to

the following:

� sub-grade materials;

� curtains;

� flooring material concealed beneath carpeting, ceramic tile, brickwork, hardwood flooring and/or concealed beneath existing sub-floors;

� drywall and/or wall plaster materials concealed behind new and/or additional walls;

� woven tape inside duct connection joints;

� inner ducting insulation;

� refractory brick;

� insulation material present inside walls (i.e. suspected asbestos-containing vermiculite insulation inside concrete block and/or brick walls);

� pipe straight-run and pipe elbow insulation within wall cavities, inaccessible ceiling spaces or crawlspaces;

� insulation materials inside fire doors;

� the mechanical inner linings of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) units; and,

� heat protection materials inside mechanical installations and light fixtures.

If encountered during renovation or other activities, any suspected ACMs not identified within this report

should be presumed to contain asbestos and handled as such until otherwise shown to be non

asbestos-containing through analytical testing.

5.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

Asbestos is included in the Designated Substances Regulations made under Ontario's OHSA. The

Designated Substance Regulation respecting Asbestos (R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 837, amended to O. Reg.

279/05) primarily regulates worker exposure to asbestos during manufacturing of asbestos containing

products, but also includes requirements related to respiratory equipment, measurement of airborne

fibres, and medical surveillance of exposed workers.

The Ontario Regulation 278/05 made under the OHSA for Asbestos on Construction Projects and in

Buildings and Repair Operations, clearly defines asbestos-containing material as a material that

contains 0.5 per cent or more asbestos by dry weight. The new asbestos regulation (O. Reg. 278/05)

became effective as of November 1, 2005.

Page 8: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 4

The General Waste Management Regulation (O. Reg. 347/90), under the Environmental Protection Act

(EPA) of Ontario, sets out the requirements for the proper disposal of asbestos waste in Ontario. The

waste must be placed in a double sealed container, properly labeled, free of cuts, tears or punctures

and disposed of at a licensed waste station which has been properly notified of the presence of

asbestos waste.

6.0 ASSESSMENT RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The result of the assessment for asbestos-containing building materials is discussed below. The

evaluation criterion for assessing asbestos-containing materials is provided in Appendix 5. A list of

definitions for technical terms used in this report is provided in Appendix 6.

Asbestos-containing materials are grouped into two classifications, friable and non-friable materials.

Friable ACMs are those that can easily be crumbled or broken apart by mere hand pressure. When

these materials break apart asbestos fibres are then released into the atmosphere. Non-friable ACMs

or “manufactured products” are materials that by the nature of their manufacturing/construction do not

readily allow the release of asbestos fibres. These materials should not be cut or shaped with power

tools, since this procedure may allow for the release of the asbestos fibres.

O. Reg. 278/05 requires that an Asbestos Management Program (AMP) be implemented in buildings

that have been identified to contain friable and non-friable ACMs.

A summary list of the bulk samples that were collected during the assessment including a description of

the material, sampling location, type of analysis and laboratory test results is provided in Appendix 2.

A copy of the PLM laboratory Certificate of Analysis is provided in Appendix 4.

A summary of occurrences of asbestos-containing materials for areas that were inspected is provided

in Appendix 3. Each ACM occurrence includes the following information:

� room component that contains ACM;

� location of the ACM within the room space;

� ACM description;

� estimated quantity;

� original sample number or representative sample number;

� friability; and,

� condition.

Page 9: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 5

6.1 Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the subject

facility in the form of:

� Insulating cement on pipe fittings; and,

� Hot water tank–body insulation.

Refer to Appendix 2 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and

condition of these ACMs.

6.2 Non-Friable Asbestos-Containing Materials

During the assessment, non-friable ACMs were identified by laboratory analysis to be present at the

subject facility in the form of:

� 12”x12” vinyl floor tiles.

Refer to Appendix 2 for the type and asbestos content; and Appendix 3 for specific location and condition of these ACMs.

6.3 Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Presumed asbestos-containing materials were observed to be present at the subject facility. The

following materials were identified but not sampled:

� Cement pipe;

� Window and door caulking materials;

� Roof caulking materials;

� Roofing materials;

� Mastics; and,

� Chalkboards.

These materials were not sampled during the assessment to avoid damage. The materials were

observed to be in good condition. As these materials are known to have been manufactured with

asbestos, they should be presumed to be asbestos-containing unless proven otherwise by laboratory

analysis.

6.4 Non-Asbestos-Containing Materials

Refer to Appendix 2 for a list of materials identified as non-asbestos containing through sampling and laboratory analysis.

Page 10: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 6

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on visual assessment and laboratory analysis, Jacques Whitford recommends the following with

regards to the ACMs and PACMs in the facility assessed:

� Prior to demolition or renovation work, undertake testing of presumed asbestos-containing materials to determine their asbestos content;

� Asbestos-containing materials should be removed prior to the start of renovation work that may impact the material, in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05; and,

� Should a material suspected to contain asbestos fibres become uncovered during demolition or renovation activities, all work in the areas that may disturb the material should be stopped. Samples of the suspect material should be submitted for laboratory analysis to determine if asbestos fibres are present. Confirmed asbestos materials should be handled in accordance with O. Reg. 278/05.

8.0 CLOSURE

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Toronto Catholic District School Board. The

report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Jacques

Whitford Limited and the Toronto Catholic District School Board.

Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions based on it, are the

responsibility of such third parties. Jacques Whitford Limited accepts no responsibility for damages, if

any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained

professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific

practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not

be construed as legal advice.

The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Jacques Whitford

Limited based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions

encountered by Jacques Whitford Limited at the time the work was performed at the specific

assessment and/or sampling locations, and can only be extrapolated to an undefined limited area

around these locations. The extent of the limited area depends on building construction and conditions,

weather, building usage and other factors. Due to the nature of the investigation and the limited data

available, Jacques Whitford Limited cannot warrant against undiscovered environmental liabilities.

If any conditions become apparent that differ significantly from our understanding of conditions as

presented in this report, we request that we be notified immediately to reassess the conclusions

provided herein.

We trust that the above is satisfactory for your purposes at this time. Should you have any questions or

concerns, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your

convenience.

Page 11: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 7

This report was prepared by Rabi Gautam and reviewed by Martin Ling and Steven D. Fulford.

Sincerely,

JACQUES WHITFORD LIMITED

ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE

Rabi Gautam Steven D. Fulford Report Author Senior Reviewer ORIGINAL SIGNATURE ON FILE Martin Ling Project Manager Enclosures P:\CMiC Jobs\1025xxx\1025760\REPORTS\356 - St. Edmond Champion\St. Edmond Champion Report.docx

Page 12: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 1

Floor Plans Showing Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials

Page 13: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior
Page 14: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior
Page 15: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 2

Summary of Results of Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos Content

Page 16: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Summary of Bulk Sample Analysis for Asbestos Type and Content

Sample

Number

AnalysisDescription of Sampled Material Asbestos Type

and Content

Sampling Location

356-BS-01A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with

white/grey smudges

Room 210

356-BS-01B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with

white/grey smudges

Room 210

356-BS-01C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with

white/grey smudges

Room 210

356-BS-02A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with pink and

grey smears

1st Floor - Corridor

356-BS-02B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with pink and

grey smears

1st Floor - Corridor

356-BS-02C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with pink and

grey smears

Corridor 201

356-BS-03A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - bright green with

dark green smudges

Room 119

356-BS-03B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - bright green with

dark green smudges

Room 119

356-BS-03C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - bright green with

dark green smudges

Room 119

356-BS-04A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with

white/black smudges

Room 120

356-BS-04B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with

white/black smudges

Room 208

356-BS-04C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with

white/black smudges

Room 120

356-BS-05A 4% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown

and white streaks

Room 106 - Gym

356-BS-05B SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown

and white streaks

Room 107

356-BS-05C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown

and white streaks

Room 113A

356-BS-06A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey

smears

Room 123

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy

TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

BS - Bulk Sample

nd - None Detected

SP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

1

Notes:

-Mar-200811-Mar-2008

Page 17: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample

Number

AnalysisDescription of Sampled Material Asbestos Type

and Content

Sampling Location

356-BS-06B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey

smears

Room 209

356-BS-06C Not Submitted PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with grey

smears

Room 123

356-BS-06D None Detected PLM12" x 12" size vinyl floor tile - white with grey

smears

Room 123

356-BS-07A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with beige

smudges

Room 115

356-BS-07B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with beige

smudges

Room 116

356-BS-07C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - white with beige

smudges

Room 115

356-BS-08A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with grey

smudges

Room 118

356-BS-08B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with grey

smudges

Room 118

356-BS-08C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with grey

smudges

Room 118

356-BS-09A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - aqua smudgesRoom 103

356-BS-09B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - aqua smudgesRoom 103

356-BS-09C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - aqua smudgesRoom 103

356-BS-10A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green smudgesRoom 105

356-BS-10B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green smudgesRoom 105

356-BS-10C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - green smudgesRoom 105

356-BS-11A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with brown

streaks

Room 211

356-BS-11B None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with brown

streaks

Room 211

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy

TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

BS - Bulk Sample

nd - None Detected

SP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

2

Notes:

-Mar-200811-Mar-2008

Page 18: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample

Number

AnalysisDescription of Sampled Material Asbestos Type

and Content

Sampling Location

356-BS-11C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with brown

streaks

Room 211

356-BS-12A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with white

specks

Room 204

356-BS-12B Insuffient Material PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with white

specks

Room 204

356-BS-12C None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with white

specks

Room 209

356-BS-12D None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - blue with white

specks

Room 205

356-BS-13A None Detected PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white

streaks

Room 112

356-BS-13B 4% Chrysotile PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white

streaks

Room 112

356-BS-13C SP PLM12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white

streaks

Room 112

356-BS-14A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure2nd floor corridor

356-BS-14B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissureRoom 209

356-BS-14C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - large fissure2nd Floor - Corridor

356-BS-15A None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - fissure with

pinhole pattern

1st Floor - Corridor

356-BS-15B None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - fissure with

pinhole pattern

1st floor - Corridor

356-BS-15C None Detected PLM2' x 4' acoustical ceiling tile - fissure with

pinhole pattern

1st floor - Corridor

356-BS-16A None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 119

356-BS-16B None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 115

356-BS-16C None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 115

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy

TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

BS - Bulk Sample

nd - None Detected

SP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

3

Notes:

-Mar-200811-Mar-2008

Page 19: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample

Number

AnalysisDescription of Sampled Material Asbestos Type

and Content

Sampling Location

356-BS-16D None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 209

356-BS-16E None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compound2nd Floor - Corridor

356-BS-16F None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 119

356-BS-16G None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compound1st Floor - Corridor

(Outside Room 115)

356-BS-16H None Detected PLMDrywall joint-fill compoundRoom 204

356-BS-17A 89% Chrysotile PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 106 - Gym

Storage Area

356-BS-17B SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 106 - Gym

Storage Area

356-BS-17C SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsRoom 106 - Gym

Storage Area

356-BS-18A 53% Chrysotile PLMHot water tank - body insulationBoiler Room

356-BS-18B SP PLMHot water tank - body insulationBoiler Room

356-BS-18C SP PLMHot water tank - body insulationBoiler Room

356-BS-19A 69% Chrysotile PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsBoiler Room

356-BS-19B SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsBoiler Room

356-BS-19C SP PLMInsulating cement on pipe fittingsBoiler Room

PLM - Polarized Light Microscopy

TEM - Transmission Electron Microscopy

BS - Bulk Sample

nd - None Detected

SP - Stop Positive (not analyzed)

4

Notes:

-Mar-200811-Mar-2008

Page 20: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 3

Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos Containing Materials

Page 21: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Summary of Occurrences of Asbestos-Containing Materials

Room SpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable? Visible? Access. Comments/Notes

ACMCondition

Level ACMLocation

insulating cement on pipe fitting 120-130 356-BS-19A Yes 69% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM 113C (Boiler Room)

mechanicalmechanical1

hot water tank insulation 15 sq. m 356-BS-18A Yes 53% chrysotile Yes Yes A good ACM 113C (Boiler Room)

mechanicalmechanical1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

375 sq. m 356-BS-05A Yes 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM106 floorfloor1

insulating cement on pipe fitting 15-20 356-BS-17A Yes 89% chrysotile Yes Yes C good ACM106 mechanicalstorage area near stage

1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

72 sq. m Ref 356-BS-05A No 4% chrystoile No Yes A good ACM106A floorthroughout1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

5 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM106B floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

15 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM106C floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

15 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM106D floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

15 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM107 floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

5 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM111 floorfloor1

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

1

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

Notes:

11-Mar-2008

Page 22: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Room SpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable? Visible? Access. Comments/Notes

ACMCondition

Level ACMLocation

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

10 sq. m 356-BS-13B Yes 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM112 floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

10 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM112A floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

20 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM112B floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

15 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM113A floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - beige with brown & white streaks

3 sq. m Ref 356-BS-05A No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM113B floorthroughout1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

20 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM117 floorfloor1

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

30 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM123A floorfloor1

cement pipe 20 m ns No ns No No C good PACM201 (Corridor) mechanicalabove ceiling2

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

3 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM202 floorfloor2

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

30 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM203 floorfloor2

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

15 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM206 floorfloor2

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

2

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

Notes:

11-Mar-2008

Page 23: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Room SpecificLocation

ACM Type EstimatedQuantity

SampleNumber

OriginalSample?

Asbestos Content

Friable? Visible? Access. Comments/Notes

ACMCondition

Level ACMLocation

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

10 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM210A (Corridor) floorfloor2

12" x 12" vinyl floor tile - grey with white streaks

30 sq. m Ref: 356-BS-13B No 4% chrysotile No Yes A good ACM210B floorfloor2

Yes - Suspect material is visible without opening hatches or lifting ceiling tiles No - Suspect material can only be viewed if access hatches are opened or ceiling tiles lifted.

A - Areas of the building within reach (from floor level) of all building usersB - Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladderC - Areas of the building above 2.4 m where use of a ladder is required to reach the asbestosD - Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc., where demolition of the ceiling, wall, or equipment, etc., is required to reach the asbestos

Accessibility Classification

Visibility

Notes: ACM - asbestos-containing material PACM - presumed asbestos-containing material Access. - accessibility nq - not quantified na - not applicable ns - not sampled REF - reference sample x - estimated number of units F - friable NF - non friable PFM - potentialy friable material S - Sample (original sample collected) V - Visually identical sample

3

* Based on a non-intrusive inspection of visible surfaces within the room space.

Notes:

11-Mar-2008

Page 24: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 4

Laboratory Analytical Report – Asbestos: Polarized Light Microscopy

Page 25: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-01A Composite Result390703798-0001

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-01B Composite Result390703798-0002

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-01C390703798-0003

Cream None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-02A Composite Result390703798-0004

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-02B Composite Result390703798-0005

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-02C Composite Result390703798-0006

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-03A390703798-0007

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

1

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 26: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-03B390703798-0008

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-03C390703798-0009

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-04A390703798-0010

Cream None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-04B Composite Result390703798-0011

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-04C390703798-0012

Cream None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-05A390703798-0013

VariousNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile4%Non-fibrous (other)96%

356-BS-05B Composite Result390703798-0014

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-05C390703798-0015

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

2

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 27: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-06A390703798-0016

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-06B390703798-0017

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-06C390703798-0018

Not Submitted

356-BS-07A Composite Result390703798-0019

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-07B390703798-0020

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-07C390703798-0021

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-08A390703798-0022

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-08B390703798-0023

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

3

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 28: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-08C390703798-0024

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-09A390703798-0025

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-09B390703798-0026

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-09C390703798-0027

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-10A390703798-0028

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-10B390703798-0029

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-10C390703798-0030

Blue None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-11A390703798-0031

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose2%Wollastonite4%

Non-fibrous (other)94%

4

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 29: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-11B Composite Result390703798-0032

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Cellulose2%Wollastonite4%

Non-fibrous (other)94%

356-BS-11C Composite Result390703798-0033

Various None Detected

Non-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Wollastonite5% Non-fibrous (other)95%

356-BS-12A390703798-0034

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-12B Composite Result390703798-0035

VariousNon-Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile<1%Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-12C390703798-0036

Green None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-13A390703798-0037

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)62%Quartz38%

356-BS-13B390703798-0038

VariousNon-FibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile4%Non-fibrous (other)96%

5

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 30: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-13C390703798-0039

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-14A390703798-0040

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose28%Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7%Perlite28%

356-BS-14B390703798-0041

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose28%Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7%Perlite28%

356-BS-14C390703798-0042

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)30%

356-BS-15A390703798-0043

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose28%Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7%Perlite28%

356-BS-15B390703798-0044

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose28%Min. Wool37%

Non-fibrous (other)7%Perlite28%

356-BS-15C390703798-0045

Various None Detected

FibrousHeterogeneous

Cellulose30%Min. Wool40%

Non-fibrous (other)30%

356-BS-16A390703798-0046

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)91%Perlite9%

6

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 31: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-16B390703798-0047

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-16C390703798-0048

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-16D390703798-0049

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-16E390703798-0050

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)91%Perlite9%

356-BS-16F390703798-0051

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-16G390703798-0052

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-16H390703798-0053

Various None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-17A390703798-0054

GrayFibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile89%Non-fibrous (other)11%

7

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 32: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

390703798

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985 NOTE: All samples composited at the request of the client

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/30/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-17B390703798-0055

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-17C390703798-0056

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-18A Composite Result390703798-0057

VariousFibrous

Heterogeneous

Chrysotile53%Min. Wool29% Non-fibrous (other)18%

356-BS-18B390703798-0058

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-18C390703798-0059

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-19A390703798-0060

GrayFibrousHeterogeneous

Chrysotile69%Non-fibrous (other)31%

356-BS-19B390703798-0061

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

356-BS-19C390703798-0062

Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)

8

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. Samples reported as <1% or none detected may require additional testing by TEM to confirm asbestos quantities. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Donald Schmidt (19)Sue Ferrario (43)

Page 33: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % TypeAsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure.

390704077

Attn: Martin LingJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760-985Received: 08/15/07 8:40 AM

Job #1025760 Phase #985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:8/31/2007Analysis Date:

Report Date: 8/31/2007

EMSL Analytical, Inc.11040A Lin-Valle Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63123Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (14 ) 845-6459 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-12B390704077-0001

Insufficient Material

Jeff Siria, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLMPointCount-1 1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytyical Inc suggests that samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government. EMSL Analytical Inc., bears no esponsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc., liability is limited to the cost of sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.Analysis performed by EMSL St. Louis (AIHA #102636, NVLAP # 200742-0, CA ELAP #2668)

Sue Ferrario (1)

Page 34: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

Sample Location Appearance % Type

AsbestosNon-Asbestos

% Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy

040803483

Attn: Rabi GautamJacques Whitford7271 Warden AvenueMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 5X5

Customer PO: 1025760 985Received: 02/14/08 10:00 AM

1025760 PHASE 985

Customer ID: JACQ30J

Fax: (905) 479-9326 Phone: (905) 474-7700Project:

EMSL Order:

EMSL Proj:2/20/2008Analysis Date:

Report Date: 2/21/2008

EMSL Analytical, Inc.107 Haddon Ave., Westmont, NJ 08108Phone: (856) 858-4800 Fax: (856) 858-4960 Email: [email protected]

356-BS-06D040803483-0001

ROOM 123***DO NOT ANALYZE MASTIC***

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

356-BS-12D040803483-0002

ROOM 205***DO NOT ANALYZE MASTIC***

White None Detected

Non-FibrousHeterogeneous

Non-fibrous (other)100%

1

Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manageror other approved signatory

PLM-1

Analyst(s)

THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.

Due to magnification limitations inherent in PLM, asbestos fibers in dimensions below the resolution capability of PLM may not be detected. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 1%. The above test report relates only to the items tested and may not be reproduced in any form without the express written approval of EMSL Analytical, Inc. EMSL’s liability is limited to the cost of analysis. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government.Analysis performed by EMSL Westmont (NVLAP #101048-0), NY ELAP 10872

Erica Valent (2)

Page 35: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 5

Evaluation Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials

Page 36: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 Appendix 5-1

Criteria for Assessing Asbestos Containing Materials

A description of the criteria used in evaluating the condition, accessibility and exposure risk of

asbestos-containing materials is provided below. The criteria is generally based on the Public Works

and Government Services Canada (PWGSC) document entitled “Deputy Ministers Directive 057 –

Asbestos Management” (Last Revised 1999/07/16) and industry standards of practice.

Assessment of Condition

Spray Applied Fireproofing, Insulation and Textured Finishes

In evaluating the condition of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, thermal insulation or texture,

decorative or acoustic finishes, the following criteria apply:

Good

Surface of material shows no significant signs of damage, deterioration or delamination. Up to one

percent visible damage to surface is allowed within range of GOOD. Evaluation of sprayed fireproofing

requires the Assessor to be familiar with the irregular surface texture typical of sprayed asbestos

products. GOOD condition includes unencapsulated or unpainted fireproofing or texture finishes,

where no delamination or damage is observed, and encapsulated fireproofing or texture finishes where

the encapsulation has been applied after the damage or fallout occurred.

Poor

Sprayed materials show signs of damage, delamination or deterioration. More than one percent

damage to surface of ACM spray.

In observation areas, where damage exists in isolated locations, both GOOD and POOR condition may

be reported. The extent or percentage of each condition will be recorded on the Assessor’s

reassessment form.

FAIR condition is not utilized or considered as a valid criterion in the evaluation of sprayed fireproofing,

sprayed insulation, or texture coat finishes.

The evaluation of ACM spray applied as fireproofing, non-mechanical thermal insulation, or texture,

decorative or acoustic finishes which are present above ceilings, may be limited by the number of

observations made, and by building components such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct the

above ceiling observations. Persons entering the ceiling area are advised to be watchful for ACM

DEBRIS prior to accessing or working above ceilings in areas of building with ACM, regardless of the

reported condition.

Other ACM

In evaluating the condition of mechanical insulation (on boilers, breaching, ductwork, piping, tanks,

equipment etc.) the following criteria are used:

Page 37: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 Appendix 5-2

Good

Insulation is completely covered in jacketing and exhibits no evidence of damage or deterioration. No

insulation is exposed. Includes conditions where the jacketing has minor surface damage (i.e., scuffs

or stains), but the jacketing is not penetrated.

Fair

Minor penetration damage to jacketed insulation (cuts, tears, nicks, deterioration or delamination) or

undamaged insulation that has never been jacketed. Insulation is exposed but not showing surface

disintegration. The extent of missing insulation ranges should be minor to none.

Poor

Original insulation jacket is missing, damaged, deteriorated or delaminated. Insulation is exposed and

significant areas have been dislodged. Damage cannot be readily repaired. The evaluation of

mechanical insulation may be limited by the number of observations made and building components

such as ducts or full height walls that obstruct observations. In these circumstances, it is not possible

to observe each foot of mechanical insulation from all angles.

Non-Friable and Potentially Friable Materials

Non-friable materials generally have little potential to release airborne fibres, even when damaged by

mechanical breakage. However, some non-friable materials, i.e., exterior asbestos cement products,

may have deteriorated so that the binder no longer effectively contains the asbestos fibres. In such

cases of significantly deteriorated non-friable material, the material will be treated as a friable product.

Evaluation of Accessibility

The accessibility of building materials known or suspected of being ACM is rated according to the

following criteria:

Access (A)

Areas of the building within reach of all building users. Includes areas such as gymnasiums,

workshops, and storage areas where activities of the building users may result in disturbance of ACM

not normally within reach from floor level.

Access (B)

Frequently entered maintenance areas within reach of maintenance staff, without the need for a ladder.

Includes: frequently entered pipe chases, tunnels and service areas or areas within reach from a fixed

ladder or catwalk, i.e., tops of equipment, mezzanines.

Access (C) Exposed

Areas of the building above 8'0" where use of a ladder is required to reach the ACM. Only refers to

ACM materials that are exposed to view, from the floor or ladder, without removing or opening other

building components such as ceiling tiles, or service access doors or hatches. Does not include

infrequently accessed service areas of the building.

Page 38: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 Appendix 5-3

Access (C) Concealed

Areas of the building which require the removal of a building component, including lay-in ceilings and

access panels into solid ceiling systems. Includes rarely entered crawl spaces, attic spaces, etc.

Observations are limited to the extent visible from the access points.

Access (D)

Areas of the building behind inaccessible solid ceiling systems, walls, or mechanical equipment, etc.

where demolition of the ceiling, wall or equipment, etc., is required to reach the ACM. Evaluation of the

condition and extent of ACM is limited or impossible, depending on the Assessor's ability to visually

examine the materials In Access D.

Page 39: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

APPENDIX 6

Terms and Definitions

Page 40: St. Edmond Champion Report · roofing materials, mastics and chalkboards. These materials were observed to be in good condition and were not sampled to preserve their integrity. Prior

© 2008 PROJECT 1025760 March 11, 2008 Appendix 6-1

Terms and Definitions

Asbestos

Any of the following asbestiform silicate minerals: actinolite asbestos, anthophyllite asbestos,

chrysotile, crocidolite, cumming tonite-grunerite asbestos (amosite), tremolite asbestos with a dry

weight concentration greater than 0.5%.

Friable

Capable of being crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

HEPA Filter

A high efficiency particulate aerosol filter that is at least 99.97 per cent efficient in collecting a 0.3

micrometre aerosol.

Homogeneous Material

A material that is uniform in colour and texture

Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM)

Polarized Light Microscopy is a technique accepted by the US Environmental Protection Agency as a

screening method for detecting asbestos fibres in bulk material samples.

Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PACMs)

Materials that are known to have been manufactured contain asbestos. Testing of the material is

required to determine if the material contains asbestos fibres.

Recommended Corrective Actions (RCAs)

Areas identified to consist of asbestos-containing or presumed asbestos-containing materials that

require attention to repair or remove damaged materials.

Building

Any structure, vault, chamber or tunnel including, without limitation, the electrical, plumbing, heating

and air handling equipment (including rigid duct work) of the structure, vault, chamber or tunnel.