ssepd: corporate it benchmarking revie · ssepd: corporate it benchmarking review...
TRANSCRIPT
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
4th June 2013
323481 TNC TCS 01 01
Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
4th June 2013
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
4th June 2013
Mott MacDonald, Victory House, Trafalgar Place, Brighton BN1 4FY, United Kingdom
T +44(0) 1273 365 000 F +44(0) 1273 365 100 W www.mottmac.com
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description Standard0.1 1.0
21/05/2013 03/06/2013
Adam Harwin Paul Sutherland
Paul Sutherland Helen Shapcott
Richard Hewlett Paul Sutherland
Draft Final
Issue and revision record
This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose.
We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties.
This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from us and from the party which commissioned it..
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
Chapter Title Page
Executive Summary i
1 Overview and Context 1
1.1 About Benchmarking ________________________________________________________________ 1 1.2 Benchmarking Approach _____________________________________________________________ 2
2 Benchmark Results 3
2.1.1 Annual Revenue Expenditure Benchmarks _______________________________________________ 3 2.1.2 Capital Expenditure Benchmarks _______________________________________________________ 5 2.1.3 IT Staff and User Benchmarks _________________________________________________________ 7 2.1.4 General Industry Changes in Corporate IT Expenditure ______________________________________ 8
3 Conclusion 9
Appendices 10
Appendix A. All Benchmarks for SSE Corporate IT __________________________________________________ 11 Benchmarks for SSEPD Corporate IT _____________________________________________________________ 11 A.1 Objectives ________________________________________________________________________ 11 A.2 Metrics __________________________________________________________________________ 11
Contents
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
i /TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013
Background
Scottish and Southern Energy Power Distribution (SSEPD) is the licenced electricity distributor
for central southern England (trading as SEPD Limited) and Northern Scotland (trading as
SHEPD Limited). SSEPD is part of the SSE Group PLC which is involved in the generation,
transmission, distribution and supply of electricity; in the production, storage, distribution and
supply of gas and in other energy services.
Scope
Mott MacDonald was commissioned by SSEPD to carry out a high level benchmarking study on
the company’s Corporate (Non-Operational) Information Technology Operations, to support
SSEPD’s RIIO-ED1 submission to Ofgem. The period reviewed was the year to 31/03/2012, with
comparator and industry data from the appropriate period.
Conclusion
� SSEPD’s Corporate IT benchmark for 2012 expenditure against revenue is 1.09%, which
places it favourably when compared to both a basket of 2,295 other companies, and other
Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) and Utility companies. The DNO comparator median
performance was 1.39%1
� The benchmark for the cost of Corporate IT compared to SSEPD’s operating expenditure is
2.5% which is significantly below the utilities sector benchmark of 3.4%2
� SSEPD is in the top quartile for low capital expenditure, this is despite the fact that during the
year an Oracle based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, called “Harmony”, was
commissioned into service.
After reviewing for qualitative measures such as fitness for purpose and user satisfaction, it is
apparent that SSEPD are investing sufficient capital to both maintain and improve their Corporate
IT offering. However, this is work in progress with significant future benefits still to be realised
both within IT and potentially across other corporate business functions.
SSE has recently invested heavily in Corporate IT, after a period of lower investment, and this
renewed commitment is on-going as new functionality largely focused around its ERP system
1 Source: Proprietary Mott MacDonald DNO IT benchmarking study 2012, using Info tech Group "measureIT" tool utilising a small
sample of Utility companies.
2 Based on Gartner Key Metrics 2013 which analysed 106 Utility Companies.
Executive Summary
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
ii /TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013
“Harmony” will be brought on stream. Additionally, there are other corporate projects such as the
Microsoft Desktop Rollout, and a major IT Security programme both in train.
IT as a function is undergoing a cultural change as it aims to transform from an overhead
department to a customer services orientated business partner, in line with industry best practice.
Again this transformation is deemed by all we spoke to, to be on-going. SSE’s and SSEPD’s
focus on IT investment mirrors Utilities behaviours in the wider benchmark group where
investment is also increasing.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
1
In April 2013 Mott MacDonald was commissioned by SSEPD, part of SSE PLC, to carry out a
benchmarking study of the company’s Corporate Information Technology. The study will support
SSEPD’s RIIO-ED1 submission to Ofgem. As a separate piece of work Mott MacDonald was
also retained to provide analysis and benchmarking of SSEPD’s Operational Information
Technology. For the benefit of clarity, this information will be delivered under separate cover and
is not part of this report.
1.1 About Benchmarking
Benchmarking can be a useful method of analysing cost and performance; however it is
important to understand the differing forms of benchmarking and their inherent limitations.
Benchmarks form a snapshot of a particular section or sub-section of a company’s operations,
and as such these metrics are liable to be distorted by any number of factors. Thus, it is true to
say that whilst they can be valuable as a yardstick, their benefits increase when repeated over
time, and the movement of benchmarks can be tracked. Benchmarking can be performed at both
high (strategic benchmarks) and low level (process benchmarks) with differing aims and outputs.
Mott MacDonald was asked to provide a high level Corporate Information Technology
benchmark, which will give an indication of top line metrics. We were also asked to compare
SSEPD to similar entities.
Additionally, we provide contextual information to give a comparison across industries. This
enables the reader to assess performance relative to both other similar businesses within the
utilities sector and to business as a whole.
More detailed benchmarking can break down areas of work within companies to individual
departments and highlight the cost of individual processes within each function. This enables
assessment of the operation in relation to best practices, and affords the opportunity for better
performing departments within or across functions to assist in improving those performing less
well, thus it assists in enabling target investment. This level of benchmarking was not attempted
at SSEPD, due to limitations of time, resources and required scope.
To provide validation and context for SSEPD, a selection of high level IT benchmarks are
provided at the SSE Group level, in order to position SSEPD Corporate IT within the context of
SSE PLC as a whole.
1 Overview and Context
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
2
1.2 Benchmarking Approach
� Mott MacDonald met with IT staff in Perth and Havant on a video conference on 23rd April
2013. At this meeting the time period to be studied was agreed to be the year from 1st April
2011 to 31th March 2012, individuals were identified who could supply relevant information
and a revised scope was discussed and agreed to be as follows:
– To determine “the present state of key IT spend metrics against market averages”;
– To “compare current IT operating costs… …against previous years”; and
– To provide “evidence of IT spend efficiency and value for money by benchmarking against
like-sized cross-industry peers”.
� Information was supplied from a number of individuals in SSEPD, (including Finance and IT).
This was reviewed by Mott MacDonald and initial benchmarks were produced by cross-
referencing with industry information and proprietary data collected by Mott MacDonald.
� Queries were followed up with SSE staff and where appropriate additional information was
supplied by SSE.
� A draft report was produced, along with a table tracing the source of benchmark input data
and this was validated through a series of meetings with client staff for accuracy and
reasonableness. In some cases, the information provided was not clear or complete and this
was reviewed face to face at a meeting with IT in Havant on 9th May 2013.
� A number of interviews with key IT staff were undertaken in the period to 30th May.
� Once all data points had been agreed the initial report was produced and findings were
discussed with SSEPD management.
� The draft report was reviewed by Mike Taylor (Service Delivery Manager); Karen Brett (IT
Performance Manager) and Frank Burton (Technical Services Manager) on 31st May 2013.
� The final report was presented to Landel Johnston, Head of RIIO-ED1 Project Team on 4th
June 2013.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
3
2.1.1 Annual Revenue Expenditure Benchmarks
SSE Group Level
SSE does not capture total IT spend as an easily accessible internal metric, as operational IT
appears to be spread through the organisation on a company and unit by unit basis. Looking at
Corporate IT alone, SSE PLC returns an extremely low benchmark of 0.16% as a proportion of
revenue when compared to the Gartner dataset of 106 Utility companies which has a benchmark
of 1.1%. SSE returns a very low benchmark here, due largely to its high revenues.
Considering the alternative benchmark of “Corporate IT as a proportion of operating
expenditure”, SSE’s result is 5.7% compared to a Utilities average of 3.4% and an ‘All industries’
average of 4.4%. This seems slightly high and may reflect the impact of multiple regulatory
obligations, at a time when compliance is high on SSE’s agenda. (For example, it is notable that
Governmental Organisations within this benchmark come in at 9.2%)3. However, there also
appears to be room for improvement in this area.
SSEPD Company Level
SSEPD’s Corporate IT benchmark for revenue expenditure is 1.09% which places it favourably
when compared to other companies as a whole, and other Distribution Network Operators
(DNOs) and utility companies. The DNO comparator median performance was 1.39%4.
Corporate IT spend to Company Revenue – 2012 DNO comparators
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT OPEX to company revenue 0.46% 1.39% 8.11% 1.09%
3 Source: “Gartner IT Key Metrics Data 2013”, published 14
th Dec 2012.
4 Source: Proprietary Mott MacDonald DNO IT benchmarking study 2012, using Info tech Group “measureIT” tool.
2 Benchmark Results
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
4
The benchmark for the cost of corporate IT compared to SSEPD’s operating expenditure is 2.5%
which is significantly below the utilities sector benchmark of 3.4%
Cost of Corporate IT to company OPEX
Utilities Average SSEPD
Cost of Corporate IT to company OPEX 3.4% 2.5%
Qualitative Observations
However, low IT benchmarks alone do not provide evidence of “value for money”, as value has
other elements as well as cost, such as fitness for purpose. For example, it might be the case
that SSE/ SSEPD are under-resourcing Corporate IT, if users felt the system was unreliable or
was seen to be performing in an unsatisfactory way by SSE staff. To this end we examined such
qualitative data as was available and found no evidence that this was the case. These findings
have been confirmed by discussions with staff/ users.
Internal satisfaction metrics collected by IT indicate that circa 97% of faults raised are fixed within
SLA targets, and this increased over the period for which data was supplied to us. Additionally,
review of user satisfaction is a measured and monitored KPI which is reported to senior
management at monthly performance review meetings. The annual “tartan tablecloth” survey is
also used to gauge IT’s relationship with the business (and vice versa).
These measures are useful tools that will support the cultural change occurring in IT, i.e. the
move from “an overhead” to a “customer services focused” organisation.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
5
Source: SSE internal KPI measurements.
Thus, the conclusion is that SSEPD is providing value for money in Corporate IT, though through
comparison to best in class, it is apparent that this is currently not optimised.
2.1.2 Capital Expenditure Benchmarks
SSE Group Level
SSE Group IT Capital Expenditure for 2012 was £30.7m giving a benchmark of 0.1% when
compared with Group Revenue. Again, due to the high gross revenues in SSE this is not as
useful a metric as a comparison against operational expenditure which returns a benchmark of
3.5%. This places it at the high end of this benchmark, when compared to Utilities and DNO’s
indicating a high level of capital investment when compared to direct comparators. This view is
consistent with feedback from SSE staff who confirm recent focus on, and an on-going
investment in, Corporate IT.
SSEPD Company level
Looking at SSEPD company level Corporate IT Capital Expenditure, this is 0.47% of Company
Revenue. This figure includes a large ERP programme to install an Oracle based system called
“Harmony”. This measure can be seen as representing the cost of maintaining IT capital
infrastructure that is used to “run” the business.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
6
Corporate IT CAPEX to Company Revenue (2011/2012)
This metric takes the SSEPD’s portion of Corporate IT Capital expenditure (£4,174,974) and
shows it as a proportion of the Company Revenue (£881,000,000) and compares this against the
results of the same metric applied to other utility companies. As can be seen, this places SSEPD
in the top quartile for low capital expenditure, this is despite the fact that during the year SSE
completed the installation of an Oracle based ERP system, called “Harmony”. The capital cost of
this in 2012 was circa £14m, (SSEPD’s share was £2.7m).
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT CAPEX to company revenue 0.23% 0.67% 3.21% 0.47%
Qualitative Observations
SSE have a 5 year IT Applications Strategy that aims to rationalise business applications from
circa 700 to around 200, making more use of enterprise-wide applications where possible.
Additionally, there is further investment that can be applied to draw out the value of Oracle
Harmony to leverage its benefits and value, for example global risk control, and self- service
employee reward schemes.
However, it is unclear whether this investment is sufficient to “transform”5 the business. It may be
that additional strategic and targeted investment in new technology is required to further improve
current infrastructure and to deliver business transformation.
This being said it appears SSEPD are investing sufficient capital to both maintain and improve
their corporate IT offering;
5 Gartner classify Capital Expenditure into segments which “run”, “grow” or “transform” the business. Assessment of projects allows a
business to understand effort involved in these different areas, this is something that is beginning to be done in SSE.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
7
2.1.3 IT Staff and User Benchmarks
SSE has 663 staff in IT of which 512 are deemed to support Corporate IT. There are 19,489
employees in the company; this gives a benchmark of 2.6% which is in alignment with Utilities
benchmark averages of 2.6%6. This metric takes SSEPD’s Corporate IT OPEX (£9,639,406) and
divides it by the number of users (1,8967 – after removing “field” staff who are considered by
SSEPD to be non-users) and compares this against the results of the same metric applied to a
sample of 106 utility companies.
Cost per IT User SSEPD
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT OPEX to total number of users (adjusted) £1,924 £4,920 £16,127 £5,084
SSEPD is very similar to the median figure within our sample of peer companies, indicating its
spend per user is in line with similar entities. Arguably, it could improve this metric were it able to
supply service at reasonable cost to the additional 2,620 field staff (58%) who are currently
largely non-users of these systems. Allocating across all staff would, for example, bring the user
cost down to £2,1358 which is comparable to best in class. However enacting this would be
dependent on business needs. Current mobile technology projects may assist in delivering some
corporate IT access to field staff. In SSE out of a total headcount of 19,489 staff, only 13,741 are
deemed IT users (71%) and of these only 9,612 (70%) are deemed corporate users for recharge
purposes. Thus across SSE as a whole, only 49% of staff are deemed Corporate IT users.
6 Derived from Gartner metrics - assumes 40% split (as per Gartner) of 6.6% all IT staff FTEs as % of employees.
7 1,896 users is derived by taking 4,516 total users and subtracting 2,260 field users. Source Corporate IT apportionment
methodology schedule..
8 There are likely to be additional costs of doing this.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
8
Qualitative Observations
SSEPD Corporate IT is undergoing a change in the way it works with the business, it has
adopted a partnership approach aimed at creating and maintaining the value IT provides. In line
with industry best practice, IT staff roles are now more focused on relationship and stakeholder
management into the business. This is alongside educating the business so that it is becomes
an ‘intelligent customer’. Evidence of this on-going change, can be seen in the length of service
of many key staff; many of the people we came across were relatively new to the organisation.
2.1.4 General Industry Changes in Corporate IT Expenditure
Across a basket of all businesses IT expenditure rose by 4% in 2012 (Utilities 5%) and is
expected to rise by another 2.9% in 2013. Two of the highest areas where IT expenditure growth
is outpacing revenue growth in 2012 are the Energy and Utilities sectors.
Across the sample of 2,295 businesses, Capital Expenditure on IT as a proportion of IT costs is
also generally increasing. In 2010 this was 25% of IT costs; by 2012 it has risen to 28%,
illustrating an increasing focus on investment.
SSE PLC increased revenue IT spend by 9.4% in 2011/12, and increased Capital spend by 4.5%
during the same period, evidencing the increased prioritisation of IT in SSE. SSEPD’s allocation
returned figures of 20% and 13% respectively.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
9
In Conclusion:
� Both SSE’s and SSEPD’s Corporate IT revenue, capital and cost per user benchmarks are at
the higher performing end of the scale when measured against both a basket of 2,295
general businesses, 106 Utilities companies, and specifically other DNO comparators:
– SSEPD’s Corporate IT benchmark for operational expenditure against revenue is 1.09%
which places it favourably against the DNO comparator median performance of 1.39%9.
– The benchmark for the cost of Corporate IT compared to SSEPD’s operating expenditure
is 2.5% which is significantly below the utilities sector benchmark of 3.4%.
– SSEPD is in the top quartile for low capital expenditure, this is despite the fact that during
the year an Oracle based ERP system, called “Harmony”, was commissioned into service.
– SSEPD’s cost per user of £5,084 is just above the industry median of £4,920.
� Corporate IT has a growing awareness and sensitivity to the user perception of its
performance, has a KPI measurement system in place which it assesses itself against, and is
improving its performance.
� SSE is working to both an overall Corporate IT plan and strategy, and has a portfolio of
projects which aim to both sustain and improve business activity.
– SSE has a strategically aligned corporate level applications strategy and is developing a 5
year applications roadmap to deliver its applications strategy.
In summary, based on the financial and qualitative data reviewed by Mott MacDonald it appears
that SSEPD’s Corporate IT function is providing value for money.
Corporate IT is part way along a journey to transform itself and provide greater value to the
business, careful adherence to strategy and good portfolio delivery will be required to ensure
benefits to SSE and SSEPD are managed, maintained and delivered in the longer term.
9 Source: Proprietary Mott MacDonald DNO IT benchmarking study 2012, using Info tech Group "measureIT" tool.
3 Conclusion
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
10
Appendices
Appendix A. All Benchmarks for SSE Corporate IT ___________________________________________________ 11
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
11
This appendix provides the reader with further insight into the analysis carried out by Mott
MacDonald and the metrics produced.
Benchmarks for SSEPD Corporate IT
A.1 Objectives
SSEPD identified three key objectives of the study, namely:
� To determine “the present state of key IT spend metrics against market averages”;
� To “compare current IT operating costs… …against previous years”; and
� To provide “evidence of IT spend efficiency and value for money by benchmarking against
like-sized cross-industry peers”.
A.2 Metrics
The following metrics address the objectives identified in section A.1:
Metric 1: Corporate IT OPEX to company revenue
Reviewing a company’s expenditure relative to revenue provides an indication of how sustainable
(I.e. affordable in the long term) the current expenditure is.
SSEPD versus the six utility companies in the comparative sample:
The table and chart below show SSEPD’s Corporate IT OPEX (£9,639,406) as a percentage of
the Company Revenue (£881,000,000) relative to the utility companies in the comparative
sample. As can be seen, SSEPD sits favourably relative to the median which suggests the
company is successfully keeping this area of expenditure to a better than average level.
Appendix A. All Benchmarks for SSE Corporate IT
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
12
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT OPEX to company revenue 0.46% 1.39% 8.11% 1.09%
SSEPD 2011/ 2012 versus 2010/ 2011:
The table below shows how the result of this metric has changed when compared with SSEPD’s
2010/ 2011 figures. Although the 2011/ 2012 result is good, the 2010/ 2011 was lower. SSEPD
should continue to monitor its Corporate IT OPEX spending if it wants to maintain current
performance.
Median
(2011/ 2012) SSEPD
2010/ 2011 SSEPD
2011/ 2012
Corporate IT OPEX company revenue 1.39% 0.93% 1.09%
Metric 2: Corporate IT OPEX to total number of users
This metric takes the SSEPD’s Corporate IT OPEX (£9,639,406) and divides it by the number of
IT users.
SSEPD has two measures for the number of IT users:
� A count of all IT users (4,516 for 2011/2012).
� The count of all IT users adjusted downwards to compensate for staff that SSE refers to as
“Field” (engineers on the road, etc.) who do not use corporate IT (1,896 for 2011/2012).
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
13
All IT Users
SSEPD versus the utility companies in the comparative sample:
This metric takes the SSEPD’s Corporate IT OPEX (£9,639,406) and divides it by the unadjusted
number of users (4,516) and compares this against the results of the same metric applied to the
utility companies in the comparative sample.
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT OPEX to total number of users (not adjusted) £1,924 £4,920 £16,127 £2,135
SSEPD 2011/2012 versus 2010/2011:
The table below shows that the same metric run for SSEPD’s 2010/2011 figures gives a result
that is better than the 2011/2012 median. This therefore reiterates the point made by the
Corporate IT OPEX to company revenue metric, above - SSEPD should continue to monitor its
Corporate IT OPEX spending.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
14
Median (2011/ 2012)
SSEPD 2010/ 2011
SSEPD 2011/ 2012
Corporate IT OPEX to total number of users (not adjusted) £4,920 £1,788 £2,135
SSEPD versus SSE Group:
For the financial period 2011/2012, the result of the equivalent metric at SSE Group level was
£3,691 per user. For the financial period 2010/2011, the result is £3,054 per user.
Cost per IT User (Adjusted for “Field” non-users)
SSEPD versus the utility companies in the comparative sample:
This metric takes the SSEPD’s Corporate IT OPEX (£9,639,406) and divides it by the number of
users (1,896) and compares this against the results of the same metric applied to the other utility
companies in the comparative sample.
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT OPEX to total number of users (adjusted) £1,924 £4,920 £16,127 £5,084
SSEPD is spending slightly more per user on Corporate IT OPEX than the median within our
sample of peer companies.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
15
SSEPD 2011/2012 versus 2010/2011:
The table below shows that the same metric run for SSEPD’s 2010/2011 figures gives a result
that is better than the 2011/2012 median. This therefore reiterates the point made by the
Corporate IT OPEX to company revenue metric, above - SSEPD should continue to monitor its
Corporate IT OPEX spending.
Median
(2011/ 2012) SSEPD
2010/ 2011 SSEPD
2011/ 2012
Operational budget to total number of users (adjusted) £4,920 £4,238 £5,084
SSEPD versus SSE Group:
For the financial period 2011/2012, the result of the equivalent metric at SSE Group level was
£5,276 per user. For the financial period 2010/2011, the result is £4,979 per user.
Metric 3: Corporate IT CAPEX to company revenue
During 2011/2012 the SSE Group made some significant capital investments on special projects,
most notably a large Oracle based ERP system referred to as “Harmony”. These capital
investments greatly impact the following metric and as such the metric is shown below, first with
these special projects excluded and then included.
Special Projects Excluded
SSEPD versus the utility companies in the comparative sample:
This metric takes the SSEPD’s Corporate IT CAPEX and shows it as a percentage of the
Company Revenue (£881,000,000) and compares this against the results of the same metric
applied to the other utility companies in our comparative sample.
SSEPD: Corporate IT Benchmarking Review
323481/TNC/TCS/01/01 4th June 2013 Q:\SSE IT benchmarking\SSE Benchmarking Report - version 1 0 FinalLJ.docx
16
SSEPD’s Corporate IT CAPEX for 2011/2012, excluding the special projects, was £1,306,957.
SSEPD’s Company Revenue for 2011/2012 was £881,000,000. The table and chart below show
how SSPEPD compare to the other utility companies in the sample in terms of IT CAPEX spend.
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT CAPEX (excluding special projects) to company revenue 0.23% 0.67% 3.21% 0.15%
Special Projects Included
SSEPD versus the utility companies in the comparative sample:
SSEPD’s Corporate IT CAPEX for 2011/2012, including the special projects, was £4,174,974.
SSEPD’s Company Revenue for 2011/2012 was £881,000,000. The table and chart below show
how SSPEPD compare to the other utility companies in the sample in terms of IT CAPEX spend.
Lowest Median Highest SSEPD
Corporate IT CAPEX (including special projects) to company revenue 0.23% 0.67% 3.21% 0.47%