ssa 4 himmerfjärden - saf approach and stakeholder involvement
DESCRIPTION
SSA 4 Himmerfjärden - SAF approach and stakeholder involvement. SAF meeting Istanbul 4th of February 2010. Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. Oxholmsgränd 3 127 48 Skärholmen www.enveco.se. Frida Franzén [email protected]. Gerda Kinell [email protected]. SSA research team. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
SSA 4 Himmerfjärden -SAF approach and stakeholder
involvement
SSA 4 Himmerfjärden -SAF approach and stakeholder
involvement
Frida Franzé[email protected]
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. Oxholmsgränd 3 127 48 Skärholmenwww.enveco.se
SAF meeting Istanbul 4th of February 2010
Gerda [email protected]
SSA research teamSSA research team
ECOLOGY TEAMRagnar ElmgrenUlf LarssonJakob WalveSusanne Kratzer Therese Arredal Harvey
ECOLOGY TEAMRagnar ElmgrenUlf LarssonJakob WalveSusanne Kratzer Therese Arredal Harvey
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se 2
SOCIAL ECONOMICS TEAMTore SöderqvistFrida FranzénGerda KinellÅsa Soutukorva
SOCIAL ECONOMICS TEAMTore SöderqvistFrida FranzénGerda KinellÅsa Soutukorva
Working with SAF – limitations and possibilities
Working with SAF – limitations and possibilities
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se 3
The coastal zone stakeholders and their interest in participating in SPICOSA – composition and knowledge
The coastal zone stakeholders and their interest in participating in SPICOSA – composition and knowledge
The knowledge, skills and competence of SSA
research team
The knowledge, skills and competence of SSA
research team
Data availablity, time/resource for
collecting new data
Data availablity, time/resource for
collecting new data
4Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Himmerfjärden coastal zone
5
Södertälje cityLake Mälaren outlet
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
HSTP
10 km
The real world- societyThe real world- society
• Institutional mapping– Administrative boundaries – municipalities,
counties – Stakeholder groups– Potential conflicts
• Governance mapping– Legislation, norms (WFD, Nitrate Directive etc)– Collaboration, forum (screening survey)
• Institutional mapping– Administrative boundaries – municipalities,
counties – Stakeholder groups– Potential conflicts
• Governance mapping– Legislation, norms (WFD, Nitrate Directive etc)– Collaboration, forum (screening survey)
6Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
7
THE EUROPEAN UNION
Swedish Government
LRF - Farmers organisation
Greppa Näringen – Farmers consulting organisation
2.1.1 The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
2.1.4 SYVAB – Himmerfjärdsverket (HSTP)
2.1.1 County Board in Stockholm 2.1.1 County Board Sörmland
Södertälje municipality
Nynäshamns municipality
2.3.1 Himmerfjärdens nature conserv.
Botkyrka municipality
PUBLIC
Salems municipality
Haninge municipality
TOURISTS
Nykvarns municipality
2.1.1 KOMMUNER (MUNICIPALITIES)
NGO’s AND ASSOCIATIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTING
2.2.5 Astra Zeneca
2.2.5 Scania
2.1 GOVERNMENT/NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTED
2.3.1 Recreational fishery org.
Biodynamic farming org.
2.2.1.4 LANTBRUKARE - FARMERS
2.2.3.1Restaurants etc
2.2.3.1 Tourism – camping etc.
2.3.1 Summer house owners
Landowners
The Swedish Water Authorities
Stakeholder meeting no. 1 Stakeholder meeting no. 1
8Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Stakeholder group is established in Södertälje nov 2007. The meeting was co-organized with the Water Authorities.
- November 2007- November 2007
Policy issue: eutrophicationPolicy issue: eutrophication
9Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
10
THE EUROPEAN UNION
Swedish Government
LRF - Farmers organisation
Greppa Näringen – Farmers consulting organisation
2.1.1 Naturvårdsverket – The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
2.1.4 SYVAB – Himmerfjärdsverket (HSTP)
2.1.1 County Board in Stockholm 2.1.1 County Board Sörmland
Södertälje municipality
Nynäshamns municipality
2.3.1 Himmerfjärdens nature conserv.
Botkyrka municipality
PUBLIC
Salems municipality
Haninge municipality
TOURISTS
Nykvarns municipality
2.1.1 KOMMUNER (MUNICIPALITIES)
NGO’s AND ASSOCIATIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTING
2.2.5 Astra Zeneca
2.2.5 Scania
2.1 GOVERNMENT/NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTED
2.3.1 Recreational fishery org.
Biodynamic farming org.
2.2.1.4 LANTBRUKARE - FARMERS
2.2.3.1Restaurants etc
2.2.3.1 Tourism – camping etc.
2.3.1 Summer house owners
Landowners
The Swedish Water Authorities
Stakeholder groupStakeholder group
• County Board (environmental analyst)• 4 municipalities officers (planners,
environmental officers)• Former CTO of HSTP• 2 process engineers at Astra Zenecas STP• Chairman of the nature conservation org. • Land owner/farmer • Farmer (was involved until 2009)
• County Board (environmental analyst)• 4 municipalities officers (planners,
environmental officers)• Former CTO of HSTP• 2 process engineers at Astra Zenecas STP• Chairman of the nature conservation org. • Land owner/farmer • Farmer (was involved until 2009)
11Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Institutional contextInstitutional context
• Consultation is institutionalized in Swedish practice
• Old ”reference group” to research at HSTP• All stakeholders agreed on
”eutrophication” as the main policy issue• Different opinions on policy options etc. • But no greater ”conflicts”• The process is not directly linked to
decision-making
• Consultation is institutionalized in Swedish practice
• Old ”reference group” to research at HSTP• All stakeholders agreed on
”eutrophication” as the main policy issue• Different opinions on policy options etc. • But no greater ”conflicts”• The process is not directly linked to
decision-making
12Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
13Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
STAKEHOLDERS POLICY FORUM
ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC and SOCIAL APPRAISAL
SYSTEM FORMULATION
SYSTEM DESIGN
Return Information
Research Design
POLICY CONSTRAINTS and GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC andEND USERS
SYSTEM OUTPUT
Deliberation
Validation
STAKEHOLDERS POLICY FORUM
ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC and SOCIAL APPRAISAL
SYSTEM FORMULATION
SYSTEM DESIGN
Return Information
Research Design
POLICY CONSTRAINTS and GOVERNANCE
PUBLIC andEND USERS
SYSTEM OUTPUT
Deliberation
Validation
SG establishedPolicy issue
Policy options
Scenarios
Communicating first results of simulation
14Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
15Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Stakeholder meeting no. 2- April 2008
Stakeholder meeting no. 2- April 2008
16Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Himmerfjärden STP Agriculture
Private sewers
After stakeholder meeting no. 2After stakeholder meeting no. 2
• Screening survey in stakeholder group – confirming policy issue, how policy issue affect ecology, economy and society in Himmerfjärden, collaboration platforms etc.
• Interviews with stakeholders• First EXTEND models
• Screening survey in stakeholder group – confirming policy issue, how policy issue affect ecology, economy and society in Himmerfjärden, collaboration platforms etc.
• Interviews with stakeholders• First EXTEND models
17Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Conceptual model for EXTEND Conceptual model for EXTEND
18Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
ESE linkages and data collectionESE linkages and data collection
19Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Version 2:Version 1:
Sediment
DetritalP
Detrital N
’ Detrital P
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
N2-fixingcyanobacteria
DIN
DIP
DONDOP
Zoo-plankton
Detrital N
Temp
Grazing
Grazing
Excretion
Surface water
Bottom water
Temp
Externalinputs
Permanent burial
Loss(mainlypredation)
DIP
DIN
SedimentationVertical mixing
Advection
System boundary
Temp
Uptake
Mineralization
Denitrification
Mineralization
AdvectionSed P
Sed N Sedimentation
Himmerfjärden SSA conceptual model – basin levelExternalinputs Sunlight
Sediment
DetritalP
Detrital N
’ Detrital P
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
N2-fixingcyanobacteria
DIN
DIP
DONDOP
Zoo-plankton
Detrital N
Temp
Grazing
Grazing
Excretion
Surface water
Bottom water
Temp
Externalinputs
Permanent burial
Loss(mainlypredation)
DIP
DIN
SedimentationVertical mixing
Advection
System boundary
Temp
Uptake
Mineralization
Denitrification
Mineralization
AdvectionSed P
Sed N Sedimentation
Himmerfjärden SSA conceptual model – basin levelExternalinputs Sunlight
Sediment
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
N2-fixingcyanobacteria
DINDIP
Annualgrazing cycle
Surface water
Bottom water
Temp
(Permanent burial)
DIP
DIN
Sedimentation
Vertical mixing
Advection
System boundary
Uptake
Mineralization
(Denitrification)
Mineralization
AdvectionSedimentation
Himmerfjärden SSA conceptual model – basin levelExternalinputs Sunlight
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
Advection
Advection
Annual light cycle
Temperature control
mortality
Annual nutrient release cycle
Mineralization
Sediment
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
N2-fixingcyanobacteria
DINDIP
Annualgrazing cycle
Surface water
Bottom water
Temp
(Permanent burial)
DIP
DIN
Sedimentation
Vertical mixing
Advection
System boundary
Uptake
Mineralization
(Denitrification)
Mineralization
AdvectionSedimentation
Himmerfjärden SSA conceptual model – basin levelExternalinputs Sunlight
Eukaryotic andpico-phytoplankton
Advection
Advection
Annual light cycle
Temperature control
mortality
Annual nutrient release cycle
Mineralization
Conceptual Model: Himmerfjärden example, EcologyConceptual Model: Himmerfjärden example, Ecology
This version was the initial ecological conceptual model of the System Design stepThe link to water transparency Secchi depth was not shown, but was planned to be linked by empirical relationship with chlorophyll
This is how the model was actually developed as a first version. The first operational version was however further simplified.
Conceptual Model: Himmerfjärden example,
water exchange
Conceptual Model: Himmerfjärden example,
water exchange
The water exchange conceptual model for the three sub-basins was first divided into only two depth layers, but was later developed into a three-layer model. This gave a more realistic model reflecting the actual sill depths between the basins. Still, of course, it is a simplification of the real world.
The numerical water-exchange model is heavily data-dependent: Salinity data is used to calculate flows according to mass-balance.
0-7 m
7-13 m
13-37 m
0-7 m
7-13 m
RainLocal runoff Local runoff Local runoffSTP
0-10 m
10-20 m
HAs
HAm
HAb
NAs
NAm
NAb
HIs
HIm
HIb
Lake Mälarenrunoff Baltic Sea
Rain Rain
13-38 m
20-43 m
Hallsfjärden Näslandsfjärden Himmerfjärden pr.
4.57
5.51
5.81
5.23
5.77
6.03
6.00
6.35
5.87316
197
4749
54
123
25
17
43
Box name Volume (Mm3)Salinity (avg. for 1997-2000)depth
Legend for model:
Stakeholder meeting no. 3- November 2008
Stakeholder meeting no. 3- November 2008
22
• Policy options• Scenario discussions• Communication of preliminary models
(ecological and socio-economic submodels)
• Policy options• Scenario discussions• Communication of preliminary models
(ecological and socio-economic submodels)
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
How do we plan the meetings?How do we plan the meetings?• About 3 hours meeting, including free lunch and
”coffee”• Suggested agenda is sent out about 2 weeks ahead• Venue: differs (municipality, STP and Enveco office)• Language/ communication: few model snapshots,
otherwise text, pictures and conceptual models• Presentation/updates of research in Himmerfjärden• Presentation of SPICOSA progress
• About 3 hours meeting, including free lunch and ”coffee”
• Suggested agenda is sent out about 2 weeks ahead• Venue: differs (municipality, STP and Enveco office)• Language/ communication: few model snapshots,
otherwise text, pictures and conceptual models• Presentation/updates of research in Himmerfjärden• Presentation of SPICOSA progress
23Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Stakeholder inputStakeholder input• Prepare discussion topics• Overall suggestions and questions (round table)• Minutes from all meetings are distributed to
stakeholder group• Informal ”coffee talk”• Also following up meetings with screening surveys
and interviews
• Prepare discussion topics• Overall suggestions and questions (round table)• Minutes from all meetings are distributed to
stakeholder group• Informal ”coffee talk”• Also following up meetings with screening surveys
and interviews
24Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
25Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
(Stakeholder meeting no. 4)- April 2009
(Stakeholder meeting no. 4)- April 2009
26
• ”Extra” meeting to discuss WFD • Submission for comments of the PoMs• Communication of user friendly interface
of model
• ”Extra” meeting to discuss WFD • Submission for comments of the PoMs• Communication of user friendly interface
of model
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
27
Between meeting no. 3-5Between meeting no. 3-5
• Questionnare to farmers • Refine model
– Increase flexibility– Sub-basins (spatial fit)– Empirical link between nitrogen loadings
and secchi depth in a further simplified ecological model
– Coupling of ecological and socioeconomic models
– Integrating preliminary questionnaire result
• Questionnare to farmers • Refine model
– Increase flexibility– Sub-basins (spatial fit)– Empirical link between nitrogen loadings
and secchi depth in a further simplified ecological model
– Coupling of ecological and socioeconomic models
– Integrating preliminary questionnaire result
28Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
29Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Socioeconomic resultsSocioeconomic results
• Present values of costs and benefits for chosen scenario
• Attempts to include cost-effectiveness measure• Qualitative values
• Additional visitors 26 000-36 000 (30 years)• Effects on local economy
• Present values of costs and benefits for chosen scenario
• Attempts to include cost-effectiveness measure• Qualitative values
• Additional visitors 26 000-36 000 (30 years)• Effects on local economy
30Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Meeting no. 5 ”Stakeholder forum, part A.”
November 2009
Meeting no. 5 ”Stakeholder forum, part A.”
November 2009
31
• Preliminary results from scenario simulations
• Adjustning final scenarios • Suggestion of refining policy options and
improving the applicability of the model• Suggestions for use – Water Authorities• Screening survey
• Preliminary results from scenario simulations
• Adjustning final scenarios • Suggestion of refining policy options and
improving the applicability of the model• Suggestions for use – Water Authorities• Screening survey
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Next meeting, ”Stakeholder forum, part B.”
March 2010 -
Next meeting, ”Stakeholder forum, part B.”
March 2010 -• The Water Authorities (responsible for
implementation of the WFD in Sweden) was suggested for using the model/results of the model
• Taking the issue to a higher institutional level, including SEPA, Water Authorities, County Boards etc.
• The aim of the meeting is to discuss future use of the model and further development/collaboration
• The Water Authorities (responsible for implementation of the WFD in Sweden) was suggested for using the model/results of the model
• Taking the issue to a higher institutional level, including SEPA, Water Authorities, County Boards etc.
• The aim of the meeting is to discuss future use of the model and further development/collaboration
32Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
33
THE EUROPEAN UNION
LRF - Farmers organisation
2.1.1 The Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
2.1.4 SYVAB – Himmerfjärdsverket (HSTP)
2.1.1 County Board in Stockholm
Södertälje municipality
Nynäshamns municipality
2.3.1 Himmerfjärdens nature conserv.
Botkyrka municipality
PUBLIC
2.1.1 KOMMUNER (MUNICIPALITIES)
NGO’s AND ASSOCIATIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTING
2.2.5 Astra Zeneca
2.1 GOVERNMENT/NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
INDUSTRY: AFFECTED
2.2.1.4 LANTBRUKARE - FARMERS
2.3.1 Summer house owners
Landowners
The Swedish Water Authorities
Important thoughts for Stakeholder forum, part B.
Important thoughts for Stakeholder forum, part B.
• Limitations and approximations of model• Links to other models? What is different?• Applying the model on other areas? What
data is needed?• Highlight that the SAF process of including
stakeholders, correspond to the demand of including local stakeholders and public into water management according to the WFD
• Suggestions from SPICOSA team?
• Limitations and approximations of model• Links to other models? What is different?• Applying the model on other areas? What
data is needed?• Highlight that the SAF process of including
stakeholders, correspond to the demand of including local stakeholders and public into water management according to the WFD
• Suggestions from SPICOSA team?
34Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Lessons learned in research team Lessons learned in research team
• EXTEND – modeling and linking social, economic and ecological variables
• How to involve and communicate with stakeholders
• Working and communicating with stakeholders is as challenging as multidisciplinary work
• Stakeholders truly concerned of policy issue and contiuned involvement in the group
• Simplifications of either ecological, social or economic systems are needed for ESE linkages
• Maintenance of models after SPICOSA?
• EXTEND – modeling and linking social, economic and ecological variables
• How to involve and communicate with stakeholders
• Working and communicating with stakeholders is as challenging as multidisciplinary work
• Stakeholders truly concerned of policy issue and contiuned involvement in the group
• Simplifications of either ecological, social or economic systems are needed for ESE linkages
• Maintenance of models after SPICOSA?
35Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
36
The ”pipeline” policy option
Stakeholder impact
Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Summary of screening surveyNovember 2009
Summary of screening surveyNovember 2009
• What have you gained from participating in the stakeholder group?
“A good network of contacts.”
”Knowledge about the project and what modeling can be used for. ”
”Increased knowledge about coastal waters in Himmerfjärden and the surroundings.”
“Better understanding of the WFD and its implications. “
”Personal contact with experts working in research projects in the area.”
• What have you gained from participating in the stakeholder group?
“A good network of contacts.”
”Knowledge about the project and what modeling can be used for. ”
”Increased knowledge about coastal waters in Himmerfjärden and the surroundings.”
“Better understanding of the WFD and its implications. “
”Personal contact with experts working in research projects in the area.”
37Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
38Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se
Thanks for listening!
Questions?
Thanks for listening!
Questions?
39Enveco Environmental Economics Consultancy Ltd. • www.enveco.se